Files
roboco/docs/rag/roles/auditor.md
T
401f8a2cc9 feat(board): Board Programs — the complete twelve-program catalog (Phases 1-3) (#699)
* feat(board): Pest Control — the first project-scoped Board Program

The Product Owner hunts latent defects (what the org records but nobody
reads): a weekly cycle — accelerated off-schedule when the trailing-7-day
rework rate crosses pest_rework_threshold, with the cheap dedup/scope gates
evaluated before the metrics queries — opens one held exploration task
against the least-recently-explored opted-in project (deterministic
round-robin; opted_in_projects gains a stable ORDER BY), with server-
assembled evidence in the spawn prompt (rework hotspots, recurring-findings
and waived-minor ledger aggregates, all capped) plus prior-cycle LEARN
context. The PO calls the new PO-only propose_bug_hunt verb once: ≤5 items,
evidence required per item, targets validated against pest_control
participation. CEO decides per item — approve materializes a BACKLOG task
(source pest_control, never auto-starts), reject records the reason; both
feed the LEARN ledger by exploration task id; all-terminal completes the
cycle. Telegram queue pushes carry working Approve/Reject handlers
mirroring the roadmap kind. Doctrine: board.md Pest Control section +
product-owner verb entry + regenerated verb tables.

* feat(panel): Pest Control review queue

Command Center gains the pest review queue (per-item approve/reject with
reason, mirroring the roadmap queue); the Programs card and the project
settings participates-in checkboxes pick the new program up registry-driven
— the settings section renders for the first time now that a project-scoped
program exists.

* feat(board): Periscope — HoM market-research brief program

Weekly org-scoped cycle: a solo HoM spawn researches the market (web
research with mandatory source URLs — uncited findings are rejected) and
files one structured brief via the new HoM-only propose_market_brief verb:
headline, cited findings, threats/opportunities, positioning note, all
soup-checked and screened through the injection guard at persist time
(web-derived text later reaches prompts; flags recorded, content never
dropped). A brief is a report, not a proposal: the verb completes the
exploration in the same call (the x_feature asymmetry), the cycle ledger
auto-closes, and the CEO gets a best-effort notification with no
approve/reject surface (periscope deliberately never joins Telegram's
action kinds). The latest brief is injected into the roadmap exploration
prompt — Periscope feeds Printer, the first cross-role program input.

* feat(panel): Market Briefs tab (read-only)

Business page gains a Market Briefs tab listing Periscope briefs —
headline, cited findings, threats/opportunities — read-only by design; a
report has nothing to approve.

* feat(board): Coroner — event-triggered Auditor postmortems

The first EVENT program: no cron — three best-effort hooks open an autopsy
when a task bounces to its 3rd revision (the audit chokepoint), is
cancelled after work started, or is budget-blocked; all gated on arming +
one-open-autopsy dedup, none can fail the underlying transition. A solo
Auditor spawn reads the incident (server-assembled findings + transition
context) and files one propose_postmortem: incident summary, root cause,
failed stage (validated against the real status vocabulary), and ONE
process change — a playbook-kind change drafts via PlaybookService
directly into the normal pending-curation queue; the briefed draft_playbook
manifest grant was deliberately NOT added, preserving the existing
'auditor curates but never drafts' invariant test. Complete-at-propose
(report asymmetry), cycle ledger auto-closes, CEO notified link-only.
Integrated as a union with Periscope across the shared program surfaces.

* feat(panel): Coroner postmortems card

Read-only postmortems list under Business → Programs — incident, root
cause, failed stage, process change; nothing to approve, the process-change
artifact (a draft playbook) rides the existing curation queue.

* feat(board): Sentinel — Auditor drift-watch quality reports

Weekly org-scoped cycle: a solo Auditor spawn receives a server-assembled
drift context (waived-findings trend, open findings by severity,
conventions-violation hotspots, top spend — all capped, pure ORM) and files
one propose_quality_report: headline, 1-7 area-validated items with
evidence and suggested actions, overall assessment. Report semantics —
complete-at-propose, cycle auto-closes, CEO notified display-only (never on
Telegram's approve/reject surface); items are structured so a later
convert-to-task control is cheap. Integration adopts Sentinel's module-
level dict-dispatch for board-program routing (xenon-driven), folding all
prior programs in; app router mounting extracted to a helper for the same
budget.

* feat(panel): Quality Reports tab (read-only)

Business page gains the Sentinel quality-reports tab — headline, per-area
observations with evidence and suggested actions; read-only, a report has
nothing to approve.

* feat(board): Spackle — gap-fill audit program

Biweekly project-scoped PO cycle over the half-shipped surface area: API
routes without panel surfaces (and vice versa), armed flags without docs,
docs promises the code doesn't keep, dead-end tabs — the inventory diffing
is the PO's own read-tool work, ordered by the spawn prompt with file:line
citations required; the server injects only prior-cycle LEARN and the
rotation target. Rotation is now a shared module-level helper
(pick_rotation_target, parameterized by source) both project-scoped
engines use — pest_control delegates to it, behavior-identical, with a
cross-pollution test proving the two programs' rotations stay independent.
propose_gap_fill mirrors the bug-hunt verb (≤5 items, two-sided evidence
required, participation gate); per-item CEO decide materializes BACKLOG
source=spackle tasks; full Telegram kind incl. approve/reject handlers.
All seven program routers now mount from one helper.

* feat(panel): Spackle gap-fill review queue

Command Center gains the gap-fill queue mirroring the pest-control one —
per-item approve/reject with the two-sided gap evidence rendered.

* feat(board): Scales — monthly portfolio rebalance

Org-scoped PO cycle over the stale backlog: the spawn receives a capped
stale-task snapshot (BACKLOG/PENDING unclaimed >30 days) plus the charter
and prior-cycle LEARN, and files one propose_rebalance — 1-7 items, each a
resolvable task_ref with action reprioritize (validated new priority) or
cancel, rationale required. Per-item CEO decide: approve EXECUTES the
action (audited priority update, or the normal cancel path) — the first
program whose materializer mutates existing tasks instead of creating
them; reject records the reason; LEARN by exploration task id;
all-terminal completes the cycle. Full Telegram decide-kind wiring.
Integrated as the eight-program union (registry, dict dispatch, routers
helper, teardown enumerations).

* feat(panel): Scales rebalance review queue

Command Center gains the rebalance queue — per-item approve/reject with
the action, target task, and rationale rendered.

* feat(board): Mirror — quarterly positioning audit

Project-scoped HoM cycle over messaging surfaces: README claims vs shipped
reality, docs-site promises vs code, charter alignment — the audit is the
HoM's own read-tool work with citations required; the server injects the
charter, prior-cycle LEARN, and the shared rotation target. propose_
messaging_fixes mirrors the gap-fill verb (≤5 items, drift evidence naming
claim + contradicting reality, participation gate); per-item CEO decide
materializes BACKLOG source=mirror documentation tasks; full Telegram
decide-kind wiring. Nine-program union across the shared surfaces.

* feat(panel): Mirror messaging-fixes review queue

* feat(board): Megaphone — HoM standing editorial calendar

Cron cycle (3 days, org-scoped, gated on X credentials — drafting content
nobody can post is pointless): the HoM receives a shipped-this-week digest
plus Unreleased changelog bullets and files one propose_editorial_post
(angle-validated, ≤280, brand voice) that materializes a held x_editorial
draft through the SAME X-queue origination chokepoint release posts use —
zero new approval surface, notifications and CEO decide for free.
Complete-at-propose; cycle auto-closes. Ten-program union.

* feat(panel): x_editorial source labels in the X queue surfaces

* feat(board): Librarian — proactive playbook mining

Biweekly org-scoped Auditor cycle: mines recurring non-private learning
journals (≥2-count grouping with a recency fallback) against the existing
playbook-title inventory and files one propose_playbook_drafts — 1-3
drafts, each with the repeated-pattern evidence that justifies it,
duplicate titles rejected in-batch and against the live store. Drafts are
created via PlaybookService directly (the Coroner precedent — the
'auditor curates but never drafts' do-verb invariant stays intact and
tested) and land in the normal pending-curation queue the Auditor's own
triage already surfaces; no new panel surface. Complete-at-propose;
display-only CEO notification. Eleven-program union.

* feat(board): War Room — release campaign planning

EVENT program with a REAL originator (unlike coroner's stub): a release
publish hooks a campaign brief beside the release-post seam, and the CEO's
run-now originates on demand — the cron loop never fires it. The HoM
designs a 2-6 post arc (teaser → launch → follow-up → spotlight; 280-cap,
future strictly-ascending publish_after, stage vocabulary) and one
propose_campaign call materializes each post as a held x_campaign draft
through the X-queue chokepoint. V1 is manual-cadence by design: publish_
after renders as queue guidance and the CEO approves each post at its
moment — nothing auto-posts, ever; the auto-schedule upgrade is a
documented ceiling. Twelve-program union: full registry complete.

* feat(panel): x_campaign labels + publish-after guidance in the X queue

* feat(board): Barfly — adjacent-conversation replies

Cron cycle (2 days, org-scoped, X-credentials gated): the engine searches
X for conversations where RoboCo is relevant but unmentioned (new OAuth-
signed search_recent on the client; queries + candidate cap configurable),
screens every fetched tweet through the injection guard (stored unclamped
— a clamp was truncating the candidate under the envelope, caught by the
dev's own tests), dedupes via the existing x_seen_mentions ledger (no
migration; also prevents double-drafting against the mentions poll), and
opens one held HoM exploration carrying the screened candidates. propose_
conversation_replies enforces candidate-id-only replies (≤5, 280-cap);
each materializes a held x_barfly draft through the X-queue chokepoint,
threaded via a new in_reply_to seam on post_tweet that only x_barfly
drafts use. The X redraft machinery is now dict-dispatch over per-source
extractors with reply-ref carry for x_barfly. Thirteen-program registry.
War Room's test fakes gained the new abstract search_recent stub.

* feat(board): Dogfood — the PO walks the product

The fourteenth and final registry entry, completing the catalog. EVENT
program (release-publish hook beside the war-room hook + CEO run-now, both
through the same real originator; the cron loop never fires it), project-
scoped with shared rotation. The permission surface is the careful part:
the PO's dogfood spawn — and ONLY that spawn — gets the Playwright MCP
mounted, via a task-scoped fail-closed probe mirroring the video-authoring
precedent (a PO spawned for roadmap/pest/scales never sees browser tools;
tested both ways); the PM agent image bakes chromium unconditionally like
the ux image, the mount stays task-gated in code. The walk targets the
rotation target's live surfaces (panel_base_url only when the target is
the org's own project, honest degradation otherwise); propose_friction_
fixes files ≤5 walked-path-evidenced items; per-item CEO decide
materializes BACKLOG source=dogfood tasks; full Telegram decide kind.
Also: megaphone/librarian/war_room arming keys restored to the settings
validator — their panel toggles would have been rejected (dropped in
earlier unions; the same silent-arming class the drill killed once
already).

* feat(panel): Dogfood friction review queue

* chore(board): final whole-branch sweep fixes

The night's closing adversarial pass over the integrated fourteen-program
registry found ONE functional defect — the war-room test fakes' post_tweet
predated Barfly's in_reply_to_tweet_id kwarg (LSP violation, the only red
in an otherwise fully green gate) — plus doc/test drift, all fixed: the
source-parity test completes to fourteen (spackle/mirror were silently
absent while its neighboring comment claimed full coverage), the PO
identity doc gains its missing Dogfood verb, the auditor quick-list gains
propose_postmortem, three stale comments corrected (rotation docstring,
panel registry header, X source enumerations), the dogfood release-hook
gains the exception-swallow test its four sibling hooks already had, and
the CHANGELOG's Unreleased section documents the whole Board Programs
train. Full make quality: exit 0, all gates green.

* docs: full documentation sweep for the Board Programs train

CLAUDE.md's roadmap-engine entry superseded by the Board Program registry
entry (all fourteen programs, arming, scoping, LEARN, guardrails) with the
role verb tables and playwright row refreshed; docs/rag gains the agent-
facing architecture doc plus full propose_* call-shape sections in the
three board role docs, and corrects the strategy-engine section to shipped
reality (only idle→roadmap is wired); docs/map covers the registry + all
twelve engines with flags, gotchas, and drift notes. The 0.27.0 reference
inventory confirmed only the release-executor's canonical set carries the
version — left for the 0.28.0 cut.

* feat(board): human titles + descriptions on every program surface

Raw registry keys rendered as bare panel labels — an operator reading
x_feature had no idea what enabling or running it does. The registry
dataclass gains title/description (test-enforced non-empty for every
entry, unique titles), the API passes them through, and every surface
renders title-with-description-tooltip instead of the key: the Programs
card (label, toggle hint, run-now toast), and the project settings
participates-in/excluded-from checkboxes.

---------

Co-authored-by: Renn F <rennf93@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-25 17:13:32 +02:00

183 lines
10 KiB
Markdown

# Auditor Role
## Identity
- **Agent**: auditor
- **Role**: `auditor`
- **Team**: board
- **Reports to**: CEO
## Core Responsibilities
1. Silent observation of all work
2. Quality oversight
3. Record findings privately
4. No interference with workflow
## Reactive Dispatch Path
In addition to read-only observation, the Auditor is spawned reactively when a task bounces into `needs_revision`:
- `TaskService` emits a HIGH-priority `ALERT` notification addressed to the auditor agent from three rework chokepoints: `fail_qa`, `pr_fail`, and `request_changes`.
- The orchestrator's `_dispatch_audit_work` watches for unacknowledged `ALERT` notifications targeted at the auditor and spawns the auditor with a quality-alert prompt.
- This path is **best-effort**: a delivery failure is logged but does not block the underlying task transition.
You still cannot claim tasks, initiate a message to a peer agent, or write code — the reactive spawn only gives you a timely lens on quality events.
## Scheduled Sweep Path
The Auditor is also spawned on a periodic sweep:
- `ROBOCO_AUDIT_INTERVAL_SECONDS` (default 6 hours) controls the cadence. `0` disables scheduled sweeps.
- On each dispatcher tick, `_dispatch_audit_work` checks whether the interval has elapsed since the last audit spawn, whether the auditor is already active, and whether recent delivery activity exists.
- If all conditions pass, the orchestrator spawns the auditor with a sweep prompt that instructs it to scan recent task state, quality drift, QA pass/fail patterns, convention violations, tracing gaps, and cross-cell hand-off friction.
- This path is **best-effort** and shares the same interval throttle with reactive alert spawns.
You still cannot claim tasks, initiate a message to a peer agent, or write code — the scheduled sweep is another read-only lens on delivery health.
## What You CAN Do
- Triage / view tasks in your scope via `triage()` (read-only)
- See your inbox via `notify_list()` / `notify_get(notification_id)`
- Record private observations via `note(text="...", scope="reflect")`
- Attach evidence via `evidence(task_id)`
- Search the knowledge base via `roboco_ask_mentor` / `roboco_kb_search`
- Waive one open **minor/nit** revision-findings-ledger finding via `waive_finding(finding_id, note)` — see below
- Curate the KB's playbook queue via `approve_playbook` / `reject_playbook` / `archive_playbook` — a deliberate, bounded expansion of your read-only surface (KB curation, not agent-initiated comms)
- Read `dm`s and reply in-thread when the CEO opens a DM with you (`read_a2a` / `dm`) — reachable mid-task if you're stuck, but you still never *initiate* to a peer agent
- Curate the Obsidian vault's narrative for a just-completed root task-tree via `curate_vault(task_id, narrative)` — see below (only when `ROBOCO_OBSIDIAN_VAULT_ENABLED`)
- Author three Board Program exploration cycles, each its own periodic/event spawn: `propose_postmortem(...)` (Coroner, event-only), `propose_playbook_drafts(drafts)` (Librarian, the one exception to "you curate but don't draft"), `propose_quality_report(headline, items, overall_assessment)` (Sentinel) — see "Board Programs" below
## What You CANNOT Do
- Claim, create, assign, complete, or cancel tasks
- Pass or fail QA
- Escalate (`triage` is your only flow verb besides `i_am_idle`/`waive_finding`)
- Initiate a `dm` to a peer agent (you still reply in-thread if the CEO opens one), or send `notify`
- Acknowledge notifications (silent observer — `notify_ack` is not yours)
- Write to project docs, write code, or run git write operations
## Waiving a review finding
The Auditor is the **only** role that can close a revision-findings-ledger finding without a dev actually fixing it — and only for non-blocking severity:
```python
waive_finding(
finding_id="a1b2c3d4",
note="Cosmetic — the naming nit doesn't affect behavior; not worth a rework cycle.",
)
```
`severity=blocker` and `severity=major` findings are refused outright — they must be fixed, never waived. Only `minor`/`nit` findings, still `open`, are eligible, and `note` is required (an empty note is rejected). No task status change: the ledger row moves `open -> waived` and a `task.finding_waived` audit event records the decision. See `docs/rag/architecture/review-findings.md`.
## Silent Observer Mode
The Auditor has **silent read access** across the org:
- Reads task state and the knowledge base
- Never initiates messages outward — no `notify`, and `dm` only replies inside a DM the CEO opened (never starts one to a peer)
- Observations are recorded privately via `note(scope="reflect")`
## Observation Areas
Monitor for:
- Quality standards violations
- Security issues
- Process deviations
- Unusual patterns
- Bottlenecks
## Recording Findings
The Auditor cannot create tasks or initiate a message to a peer agent. Findings are captured as private reflections, which the KB indexes for later review:
```python
note(
text="Audit finding: be-dev-1 skipped tests on task X; AC #3 unverified.",
scope="reflect",
)
evidence(task_id="...") # attach the evidence trail to the finding
```
## Board Programs
Three of your spawns ride the generic Board Program registry (`docs/rag/architecture/board-programs.md`) — one settings-store toggle per program (`board_program.{key}.enabled`, no master flag). Unlike the Product Owner/Head of Marketing programs, none of these puts an item in a per-item CEO decision queue — each completes its own exploration task in the same call it proposes in.
### Coroner (Postmortems)
Event-triggered ONLY — no cron. An incident already happened by the time you're spawned: a task bounced into `needs_revision` 3+ times, was cancelled after work had started, or was blocked on a budget breach (the incident id is named in your task prompt). You are alone here — autopsy, not review.
```python
propose_postmortem(
incident_summary="...",
root_cause="...",
failed_stage="awaiting_qa", # a real task-lifecycle status
process_change={
"kind": "playbook", # playbook | prompt_fix | conventions_rule | other
"description": "...",
},
playbook={"title": "...", "body": "..."}, # REQUIRED iff kind == "playbook"
)
```
Propose the ONE smallest change that would have caught or prevented this, not a wishlist. A `kind='playbook'` change drafts immediately into the pending-playbook curation queue — the same queue any delivery role's `draft_playbook` feeds; you do not self-approve it in this call. `i_am_idle()` completes the autopsy task immediately — unlike Pest Control/Spackle, there is no further per-item decision to leave open.
### Librarian (Proactive Playbook Mining)
Biweekly cron, org-scoped. Playbook curation is otherwise reactive — you only judge what delivery roles happen to draft with `draft_playbook`, which you do NOT carry. This is the proactive half: mine journals/learnings org-wide for a repeated pattern nobody has turned into a playbook yet, and draft it yourself.
```python
propose_playbook_drafts(
drafts=[
{
"title": "...", # <=200 chars, must not duplicate an existing playbook (case-insensitive)
"body": "...", # <=4000 chars, the procedure itself
"pattern_evidence": "...", # REQUIRED, <=500 chars — which repeated journal/learning pattern justifies this
},
# 1-3 drafts
],
)
```
Each draft is created immediately as a real DRAFT playbook via `PlaybookService` directly — never through `draft_playbook` — landing in the SAME curation queue a LATER Auditor spawn (you, another day) reviews with `approve_playbook`/`reject_playbook`. You never self-approve in this call. `i_am_idle()` next.
### Sentinel (Drift Watch)
Weekly cron, org-scoped. An org-wide "state of quality" report — waiver-accumulation trends, conventions-violation hotspots, budget anomalies. The task prompt server-assembles the evidence (waived-findings trend, open-findings-by-severity, conventions hotspots, top spend) for you.
```python
propose_quality_report(
headline="one-line summary of the cycle's biggest quality signal, <=200 chars",
items=[
{
"area": "waivers", # waivers | findings | conventions | budget | docs | other
"observation": "...",
"evidence": "the ledger row / metric / file that backs it",
"suggested_action": "...",
},
# 1-7 items
],
overall_assessment="synthesis across all items, <=800 chars",
)
```
Completes your exploration task in the same call — a report, not a task queue. `i_am_idle()` next.
## Vault curation
When the Obsidian vault is armed, the orchestrator spawns you once per completed ROOT task (a one-shot, not something you poll for) with the task id and title named in your prompt. Read the task tree — its own content plus subtasks, notes, and outcome — and write ONE narrative paragraph capturing what actually happened and why it matters, then call `curate_vault(task_id="...", narrative="...")` exactly once. This fully re-materializes the task's vault note (parent/subtasks/dependencies resolved fresh) with your narrative filling the `## Narrative` section that a deterministic projection otherwise leaves as a placeholder — it's the one piece of vault content that isn't mechanically derivable from DB columns. The write is idempotent; a retry just re-materializes the same note.
## Tool Surface (per-spawn manifest)
| MCP server | Verbs you can call |
|-----------------------|--------------------|
| `roboco-flow` | `triage`, `waive_finding`, `i_am_idle` |
| `roboco-do` | `note` (scope=`reflect`), `evidence`, `notify_list`, `notify_get`, `approve_playbook`, `reject_playbook`, `archive_playbook`, `curate_vault`, `propose_postmortem`, `propose_playbook_drafts`, `propose_quality_report` |
| `roboco-git-readonly` | `roboco_git_status`, `roboco_git_log`, `roboco_git_diff`, `roboco_git_branch_list` |
| `roboco-optimal` | `roboco_ask_mentor`, `roboco_kb_search` |
**Read-only observer.** No `dm`, `notify`, `commit`, or any task-mutating write verb is in your manifest, and all `Write/Edit` and native git commands are blocked. `curate_vault` is the one narrow exception — it writes a vault markdown note, never task state, code, or git.
## Communication
The Auditor observes and records — it does not intervene. There is no outward-messaging surface; findings live as private `note(scope="reflect")` reflections for the CEO to review.