401f8a2cc9 feat(board): Board Programs — the complete twelve-program catalog (Phases 1-3) (#699)
* feat(board): Pest Control — the first project-scoped Board Program

The Product Owner hunts latent defects (what the org records but nobody
reads): a weekly cycle — accelerated off-schedule when the trailing-7-day
rework rate crosses pest_rework_threshold, with the cheap dedup/scope gates
evaluated before the metrics queries — opens one held exploration task
against the least-recently-explored opted-in project (deterministic
round-robin; opted_in_projects gains a stable ORDER BY), with server-
assembled evidence in the spawn prompt (rework hotspots, recurring-findings
and waived-minor ledger aggregates, all capped) plus prior-cycle LEARN
context. The PO calls the new PO-only propose_bug_hunt verb once: ≤5 items,
evidence required per item, targets validated against pest_control
participation. CEO decides per item — approve materializes a BACKLOG task
(source pest_control, never auto-starts), reject records the reason; both
feed the LEARN ledger by exploration task id; all-terminal completes the
cycle. Telegram queue pushes carry working Approve/Reject handlers
mirroring the roadmap kind. Doctrine: board.md Pest Control section +
product-owner verb entry + regenerated verb tables.

* feat(panel): Pest Control review queue

Command Center gains the pest review queue (per-item approve/reject with
reason, mirroring the roadmap queue); the Programs card and the project
settings participates-in checkboxes pick the new program up registry-driven
— the settings section renders for the first time now that a project-scoped
program exists.

* feat(board): Periscope — HoM market-research brief program

Weekly org-scoped cycle: a solo HoM spawn researches the market (web
research with mandatory source URLs — uncited findings are rejected) and
files one structured brief via the new HoM-only propose_market_brief verb:
headline, cited findings, threats/opportunities, positioning note, all
soup-checked and screened through the injection guard at persist time
(web-derived text later reaches prompts; flags recorded, content never
dropped). A brief is a report, not a proposal: the verb completes the
exploration in the same call (the x_feature asymmetry), the cycle ledger
auto-closes, and the CEO gets a best-effort notification with no
approve/reject surface (periscope deliberately never joins Telegram's
action kinds). The latest brief is injected into the roadmap exploration
prompt — Periscope feeds Printer, the first cross-role program input.

* feat(panel): Market Briefs tab (read-only)

Business page gains a Market Briefs tab listing Periscope briefs —
headline, cited findings, threats/opportunities — read-only by design; a
report has nothing to approve.

* feat(board): Coroner — event-triggered Auditor postmortems

The first EVENT program: no cron — three best-effort hooks open an autopsy
when a task bounces to its 3rd revision (the audit chokepoint), is
cancelled after work started, or is budget-blocked; all gated on arming +
one-open-autopsy dedup, none can fail the underlying transition. A solo
Auditor spawn reads the incident (server-assembled findings + transition
context) and files one propose_postmortem: incident summary, root cause,
failed stage (validated against the real status vocabulary), and ONE
process change — a playbook-kind change drafts via PlaybookService
directly into the normal pending-curation queue; the briefed draft_playbook
manifest grant was deliberately NOT added, preserving the existing
'auditor curates but never drafts' invariant test. Complete-at-propose
(report asymmetry), cycle ledger auto-closes, CEO notified link-only.
Integrated as a union with Periscope across the shared program surfaces.

* feat(panel): Coroner postmortems card

Read-only postmortems list under Business → Programs — incident, root
cause, failed stage, process change; nothing to approve, the process-change
artifact (a draft playbook) rides the existing curation queue.

* feat(board): Sentinel — Auditor drift-watch quality reports

Weekly org-scoped cycle: a solo Auditor spawn receives a server-assembled
drift context (waived-findings trend, open findings by severity,
conventions-violation hotspots, top spend — all capped, pure ORM) and files
one propose_quality_report: headline, 1-7 area-validated items with
evidence and suggested actions, overall assessment. Report semantics —
complete-at-propose, cycle auto-closes, CEO notified display-only (never on
Telegram's approve/reject surface); items are structured so a later
convert-to-task control is cheap. Integration adopts Sentinel's module-
level dict-dispatch for board-program routing (xenon-driven), folding all
prior programs in; app router mounting extracted to a helper for the same
budget.

* feat(panel): Quality Reports tab (read-only)

Business page gains the Sentinel quality-reports tab — headline, per-area
observations with evidence and suggested actions; read-only, a report has
nothing to approve.

* feat(board): Spackle — gap-fill audit program

Biweekly project-scoped PO cycle over the half-shipped surface area: API
routes without panel surfaces (and vice versa), armed flags without docs,
docs promises the code doesn't keep, dead-end tabs — the inventory diffing
is the PO's own read-tool work, ordered by the spawn prompt with file:line
citations required; the server injects only prior-cycle LEARN and the
rotation target. Rotation is now a shared module-level helper
(pick_rotation_target, parameterized by source) both project-scoped
engines use — pest_control delegates to it, behavior-identical, with a
cross-pollution test proving the two programs' rotations stay independent.
propose_gap_fill mirrors the bug-hunt verb (≤5 items, two-sided evidence
required, participation gate); per-item CEO decide materializes BACKLOG
source=spackle tasks; full Telegram kind incl. approve/reject handlers.
All seven program routers now mount from one helper.

* feat(panel): Spackle gap-fill review queue

Command Center gains the gap-fill queue mirroring the pest-control one —
per-item approve/reject with the two-sided gap evidence rendered.

* feat(board): Scales — monthly portfolio rebalance

Org-scoped PO cycle over the stale backlog: the spawn receives a capped
stale-task snapshot (BACKLOG/PENDING unclaimed >30 days) plus the charter
and prior-cycle LEARN, and files one propose_rebalance — 1-7 items, each a
resolvable task_ref with action reprioritize (validated new priority) or
cancel, rationale required. Per-item CEO decide: approve EXECUTES the
action (audited priority update, or the normal cancel path) — the first
program whose materializer mutates existing tasks instead of creating
them; reject records the reason; LEARN by exploration task id;
all-terminal completes the cycle. Full Telegram decide-kind wiring.
Integrated as the eight-program union (registry, dict dispatch, routers
helper, teardown enumerations).

* feat(panel): Scales rebalance review queue

Command Center gains the rebalance queue — per-item approve/reject with
the action, target task, and rationale rendered.

* feat(board): Mirror — quarterly positioning audit

Project-scoped HoM cycle over messaging surfaces: README claims vs shipped
reality, docs-site promises vs code, charter alignment — the audit is the
HoM's own read-tool work with citations required; the server injects the
charter, prior-cycle LEARN, and the shared rotation target. propose_
messaging_fixes mirrors the gap-fill verb (≤5 items, drift evidence naming
claim + contradicting reality, participation gate); per-item CEO decide
materializes BACKLOG source=mirror documentation tasks; full Telegram
decide-kind wiring. Nine-program union across the shared surfaces.

* feat(panel): Mirror messaging-fixes review queue

* feat(board): Megaphone — HoM standing editorial calendar

Cron cycle (3 days, org-scoped, gated on X credentials — drafting content
nobody can post is pointless): the HoM receives a shipped-this-week digest
plus Unreleased changelog bullets and files one propose_editorial_post
(angle-validated, ≤280, brand voice) that materializes a held x_editorial
draft through the SAME X-queue origination chokepoint release posts use —
zero new approval surface, notifications and CEO decide for free.
Complete-at-propose; cycle auto-closes. Ten-program union.

* feat(panel): x_editorial source labels in the X queue surfaces

* feat(board): Librarian — proactive playbook mining

Biweekly org-scoped Auditor cycle: mines recurring non-private learning
journals (≥2-count grouping with a recency fallback) against the existing
playbook-title inventory and files one propose_playbook_drafts — 1-3
drafts, each with the repeated-pattern evidence that justifies it,
duplicate titles rejected in-batch and against the live store. Drafts are
created via PlaybookService directly (the Coroner precedent — the
'auditor curates but never drafts' do-verb invariant stays intact and
tested) and land in the normal pending-curation queue the Auditor's own
triage already surfaces; no new panel surface. Complete-at-propose;
display-only CEO notification. Eleven-program union.

* feat(board): War Room — release campaign planning

EVENT program with a REAL originator (unlike coroner's stub): a release
publish hooks a campaign brief beside the release-post seam, and the CEO's
run-now originates on demand — the cron loop never fires it. The HoM
designs a 2-6 post arc (teaser → launch → follow-up → spotlight; 280-cap,
future strictly-ascending publish_after, stage vocabulary) and one
propose_campaign call materializes each post as a held x_campaign draft
through the X-queue chokepoint. V1 is manual-cadence by design: publish_
after renders as queue guidance and the CEO approves each post at its
moment — nothing auto-posts, ever; the auto-schedule upgrade is a
documented ceiling. Twelve-program union: full registry complete.

* feat(panel): x_campaign labels + publish-after guidance in the X queue

* feat(board): Barfly — adjacent-conversation replies

Cron cycle (2 days, org-scoped, X-credentials gated): the engine searches
X for conversations where RoboCo is relevant but unmentioned (new OAuth-
signed search_recent on the client; queries + candidate cap configurable),
screens every fetched tweet through the injection guard (stored unclamped
— a clamp was truncating the candidate under the envelope, caught by the
dev's own tests), dedupes via the existing x_seen_mentions ledger (no
migration; also prevents double-drafting against the mentions poll), and
opens one held HoM exploration carrying the screened candidates. propose_
conversation_replies enforces candidate-id-only replies (≤5, 280-cap);
each materializes a held x_barfly draft through the X-queue chokepoint,
threaded via a new in_reply_to seam on post_tweet that only x_barfly
drafts use. The X redraft machinery is now dict-dispatch over per-source
extractors with reply-ref carry for x_barfly. Thirteen-program registry.
War Room's test fakes gained the new abstract search_recent stub.

* feat(board): Dogfood — the PO walks the product

The fourteenth and final registry entry, completing the catalog. EVENT
program (release-publish hook beside the war-room hook + CEO run-now, both
through the same real originator; the cron loop never fires it), project-
scoped with shared rotation. The permission surface is the careful part:
the PO's dogfood spawn — and ONLY that spawn — gets the Playwright MCP
mounted, via a task-scoped fail-closed probe mirroring the video-authoring
precedent (a PO spawned for roadmap/pest/scales never sees browser tools;
tested both ways); the PM agent image bakes chromium unconditionally like
the ux image, the mount stays task-gated in code. The walk targets the
rotation target's live surfaces (panel_base_url only when the target is
the org's own project, honest degradation otherwise); propose_friction_
fixes files ≤5 walked-path-evidenced items; per-item CEO decide
materializes BACKLOG source=dogfood tasks; full Telegram decide kind.
Also: megaphone/librarian/war_room arming keys restored to the settings
validator — their panel toggles would have been rejected (dropped in
earlier unions; the same silent-arming class the drill killed once
already).

* feat(panel): Dogfood friction review queue

* chore(board): final whole-branch sweep fixes

The night's closing adversarial pass over the integrated fourteen-program
registry found ONE functional defect — the war-room test fakes' post_tweet
predated Barfly's in_reply_to_tweet_id kwarg (LSP violation, the only red
in an otherwise fully green gate) — plus doc/test drift, all fixed: the
source-parity test completes to fourteen (spackle/mirror were silently
absent while its neighboring comment claimed full coverage), the PO
identity doc gains its missing Dogfood verb, the auditor quick-list gains
propose_postmortem, three stale comments corrected (rotation docstring,
panel registry header, X source enumerations), the dogfood release-hook
gains the exception-swallow test its four sibling hooks already had, and
the CHANGELOG's Unreleased section documents the whole Board Programs
train. Full make quality: exit 0, all gates green.

* docs: full documentation sweep for the Board Programs train

CLAUDE.md's roadmap-engine entry superseded by the Board Program registry
entry (all fourteen programs, arming, scoping, LEARN, guardrails) with the
role verb tables and playwright row refreshed; docs/rag gains the agent-
facing architecture doc plus full propose_* call-shape sections in the
three board role docs, and corrects the strategy-engine section to shipped
reality (only idle→roadmap is wired); docs/map covers the registry + all
twelve engines with flags, gotchas, and drift notes. The 0.27.0 reference
inventory confirmed only the release-executor's canonical set carries the
version — left for the 0.28.0 cut.

* feat(board): human titles + descriptions on every program surface

Raw registry keys rendered as bare panel labels — an operator reading
x_feature had no idea what enabling or running it does. The registry
dataclass gains title/description (test-enforced non-empty for every
entry, unique titles), the API passes them through, and every surface
renders title-with-description-tooltip instead of the key: the Programs
card (label, toggle hint, run-now toast), and the project settings
participates-in/excluded-from checkboxes.

---------

Co-authored-by: Renn F <rennf93@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-25 17:13:32 +02:00
2026-07-25 00:38:57 +00:00
2026-07-25 00:38:57 +00:00

RoboCo

AI Agents Company - A virtual organization of 25 AI agents + 1 human CEO, designed to operate as a complete software development workforce.

Watch the 26-minute RoboCo intro on YouTube — what it is, a walkthrough, and how to use it
Watch the 26-min intro
what it is, a walkthrough, and how to use it
Watch the 2.5-hour Working with RoboCo build session on YouTube — taking a conversation all the way to a shipped feature
Watch the 2.5-hour build session
a conversation → a shipped feature

Twelve-second looping preview of the RoboCo control panel — the org tree, a task in progress, and an approval queue.
Watch the full 2:33 walkthrough (.mp4) →

Warning

RoboCo is early-stage, work-in-progress software (v0). It's under active development, runs in a homelab, and will have rough edges, breaking changes, and bugs. It is not production-ready and the API/database schema are not stable yet. Treat it as a working prototype to explore and build on — please don't expose it to the public internet as-is. Issues and PRs very welcome.

Tip

📚 Full documentation: docs.roboco.tech — install & first run, the company model, a page-by-page panel reference, model providers, the optional subsystems, deployment, and the API.

Overview

RoboCo implements a structured organizational hierarchy with formal communication protocols, task management, and quality controls. The system enables a single human (CEO) to orchestrate complex multi-project development at scale.

CEO (You, the human)
    │
    ├── Intake (on-demand interviewer: chats only with you to draft a task)
    ├── Secretary (on-demand chief-of-staff: reads company state, runs gated directives)
    ├── PR Reviewer (read-only main reviewer: inbound external/fork + internal PRs, and the root→master in-path gate)
    │
    └── Board (3 agents)
         ├── Product Owner
         ├── Head of Marketing
         └── Auditor (silent observer, reports to you)
              │
              └── Main PM (coordinates all cells)
                   │
                   ├── Backend Cell (6 agents: 2 Devs, 1 QA, 1 PM, 1 Documenter, 1 PR Reviewer)
                   ├── Frontend Cell (6 agents: 2 Devs, 1 QA, 1 PM, 1 Documenter, 1 PR Reviewer)
                   └── UX/UI Cell (6 agents: 2 Devs, 1 QA, 1 PM, 1 Documenter, 1 PR Reviewer)

The 25 agents = Intake + Secretary + PR Reviewer + the Board (3) + Main PM + the three 6-agent cells (18). Agents run on Anthropic Claude by default, or on xAI Grok (the official grok CLI on a SuperGrok subscription) — see the provider note under Configuration.

How it works

You hand a task to the company; it runs through a real build → review → document → merge pipeline and comes back to you to approve.

One full loop, put simply:

  1. You give the Board a task — they review it. The Product Owner and Head of Marketing turn your ask into requirements and acceptance criteria.
  2. You approve — the Main PM starts the work. A notification asks for your Approve & Start decision; approve, and the Main PM breaks it into per-cell subtasks.
  3. Each cell's PM delegates, supports, and triages its developers (UX/UI, Frontend, Backend).
  4. Developers build it, QA verifies and gates it, Documenters keep the books.
  5. Cell PMs merge their PRs into the Main PM's branch.
  6. The Main PM opens the final PR and notifies you "It's done!" — you approve and merge, or send it back for rework. (Only you ever merge to master.)

— Full circle —

See the full walkthrough, with screenshots →

Or watch the full panel walkthrough (video) →

Project Structure

roboco/
├── roboco/                      # Main Python package
│   ├── api/                     # FastAPI routes & schemas
│   │   ├── routes/              # API endpoints (tasks, git, agents, etc.)
│   │   └── schemas/             # Pydantic request/response models
│   ├── services/                # Business logic services
│   │   ├── task.py              # Task lifecycle management
│   │   ├── workspace.py         # Multi-agent workspace management
│   │   ├── messaging.py         # Agent communication
│   │   └── optimal.py           # RAG/Knowledge base (in-house pgvector)
│   ├── models/                  # Pydantic domain models
│   ├── db/                      # SQLAlchemy ORM & session
│   ├── enforcement/             # Task lifecycle state machine
│   ├── runtime/                 # Orchestrator for agent spawning
│   ├── agents/                  # Agent base classes
│   ├── mcp/                     # MCP server implementations
│   └── config.py                # Application configuration
├── agents/
│   └── prompts/                 # Agent system prompts (roles, teams, identities)
├── docs/
│   ├── rag/                     # Agent knowledge base (indexed into RAG)
│   └── map/                     # Exhaustive codebase map (agent-facing)
├── alembic/                     # Database migrations
├── CLAUDE.md                    # Claude Code guidance
├── docker-compose.yml           # Full stack, built from source
└── docker-compose.registry.yml  # Full stack, pulled from the image registry

Running RoboCo

You need Docker + Docker Compose and a Claude Code auth directory on the host (~/.claude, mounted into the orchestrator so agents can reach the model). Copy .env.example to .env and set at least ROBOCO_ENCRYPTION_KEY and ROBOCO_AGENT_AUTH_SECRET (that file shows how to generate each). However you start it, the whole company is reachable at one origin: http://localhost:3000.

Optional — run agents on xAI Grok instead of Claude. RoboCo can spawn agents on xAI's official grok CLI authenticated by a SuperGrok subscription (no metered API key). Run grok login once on the host and point ROBOCO_HOST_GROK_DIR at the resulting ~/.grok so it mounts into Grok agents; the orchestrator keeps the ~6h token refreshed for you. See the Grok block in .env.example (ROBOCO_HOST_GROK_DIR, ROBOCO_GROK_AGENT_IMAGE, ROBOCO_GROK_CLI_MODEL, ROBOCO_GROK_REASONING_EFFORT).

Option 1 — Run the pre-built images (quickest)

Every release publishes all RoboCo images to both the GitHub Container Registry and Docker Hub, so you can run the full stack without building anything. One command brings it up:

git clone https://github.com/rennf93/roboco.git && cd roboco
make quickstart                    # no make? run ./scripts/bootstrap.sh directly

make quickstart (scripts/bootstrap.sh) is idempotent — safe to re-run any time. What it does:

cp .env.example .env              # only if missing — an existing .env is never touched
# ...generates ROBOCO_ENCRYPTION_KEY / ROBOCO_AGENT_AUTH_SECRET / ROBOCO_PANEL_AGENT_TOKEN in place

docker compose -f docker-compose.registry.yml pull
docker compose -f docker-compose.registry.yml up -d

# ...then polls until the stack is genuinely ready (health, migrations, Ollama
# models) and prints a doctor-style summary — or fails loud with what to check.

Note: ROBOCO_PANEL_AGENT_TOKEN is a standing CEO credential — blank it if you later arm cloud auth (see .env.example).

Choose the registry and version with two env vars (defaults shown) — set them in .env before running make quickstart:

ROBOCO_REGISTRY=ghcr.io/rennf93   # or docker.io/renzof93
ROBOCO_VERSION=latest             # or a pinned release, e.g. 0.15.0

The orchestrator spawns the matching pre-built agent images on demand — no build toolchain or source compile on your host.

Option 2 — Build from source

The same full stack, built locally from the Dockerfiles instead of pulled:

git clone https://github.com/rennf93/roboco.git && cd roboco
cp .env.example .env              # then edit in your secrets
docker compose up -d              # builds images on first run, then starts everything

Option 3 — Local development (no full stack)

For hacking on the code itself, run only the backing services in Docker and the API on your host. RoboCo's own code requires Python 3.13+ (uv will fetch it if needed):

uv sync
docker compose up -d postgres redis ollama   # backing services only
uv run alembic upgrade head                   # migrate the database
uv run python -m roboco.cli                   # API + orchestrator

# Or just the API without the orchestrator:
uv run uvicorn roboco.api.app:app --reload --host 0.0.0.0 --port 8000

Configuration

Key environment variables (see roboco/config.py for all options):

# API Server
ROBOCO_HOST=0.0.0.0
ROBOCO_PORT=8000

# Database
ROBOCO_DATABASE_HOST=localhost
ROBOCO_DATABASE_PORT=5432
ROBOCO_DATABASE_NAME=roboco

# Workspaces (Multi-Agent Git)
ROBOCO_WORKSPACES_ROOT=/data/workspaces
ROBOCO_WORKSPACE_AUTO_CLONE=true

# RAG/LLM
ROBOCO_LOCAL_LLM_BASE_URL=http://roboco-ollama:11434/v1
ROBOCO_LOCAL_LLM_MODEL=glm-5.2:cloud

# Feature flags (default-off unless noted; toggle from Settings → Feature Flags)
ROBOCO_CONVENTIONS_ENABLED=false        # per-project architectural conventions standard
ROBOCO_TOOLCHAIN_MATCH_ENABLED=false    # build each target project under its own Python
ROBOCO_OVERLOAD_BREAK_ENABLED=true      # park a provider on a persistent model-API overload
ROBOCO_DOCS_SYNC_ENABLED=false          # docs-divergence sync (release → docs-update task). Default-off; when on, a successful release publish originates one bounded, deduped docs-update task against the roboco-website project.
ROBOCO_DOCS_SYNC_MAX_OPEN_TASKS=3       # rolling cap on concurrently-open docs-sync tasks
ROBOCO_DOCS_SYNC_MAX_PER_CYCLE=1        # max docs-sync tasks originated per publish invocation

# Auditor scheduled sweeps (default 6 hours; 0 disables)
ROBOCO_AUDIT_INTERVAL_SECONDS=21600

Multi-Agent Workspace Structure

Each agent gets their own git clone for parallel development:

{ROBOCO_WORKSPACES_ROOT}/
└── {project-slug}/
    └── {team}/
        └── {agent-slug}/
            └── [git repository]

Example:
/data/workspaces/roboco/backend/be-dev-1/
/data/workspaces/roboco/backend/be-dev-2/

Task Lifecycle

backlog → pending → claimed → in_progress → verifying → awaiting_qa
    ↓                              ↓              ↓           ↓
cancelled                      blocked      needs_revision   awaiting_documentation
                               paused                              ↓
                                                           awaiting_pm_review
                                                                   ↓
                                                           awaiting_ceo_approval
                                                                   ↓
                                                              completed

Assembled, PR-bearing tasks pass through one extra stage — the in-path PR-review gate — before the PM merges:

in_progress → awaiting_pr_review → awaiting_pm_review
   (submit_up /      (pr_pass)
    submit_root)     (pr_fail → needs_revision)

The cell PM's submit_up (cell→root PR) and the Main PM's submit_root (root→master PR) open the assembled PR and enter the gate; a PR reviewer pr_passes it on to the PM merge or pr_fails it back. Leaf dev tasks (reviewed by QA) and branchless coordination roots skip the gate.

API Endpoints

Domain routes are mounted under /api:

Route Group Description
/api/tasks Task CRUD, lifecycle, claiming
/api/agents Agent management
/api/git Git operations (status, commit, push, PR)
/api/sessions Communication sessions
/api/messages Agent messages
/api/projects Project (repo) management
/api/work-sessions Git work session tracking
/api/optimal RAG/Knowledge base queries
/api/journals Agent journals/reflections
/api/orchestrator/status Orchestrator / dispatcher status

The agent gateway verbs are served separately under /api/v1/flow/{role}/{verb} (intent verbs) and /api/v1/do (content tools) — see the Agent Gateway.

Development

# Install dev dependencies
uv sync --all-extras

# Run tests
uv run pytest

# Format and lint
uv run ruff format .
uv run ruff check .
uv run mypy roboco/

# Type checking
uv run mypy roboco/

Core Principles

  1. Everything is a task - All work is tracked and documented
  2. No work without a task - Create task record first
  3. No task without acceptance criteria - How do we know it's done?
  4. No closure without documentation - Future agents need context
  5. Communication is constant - Stream reasoning, log everything
  6. The Auditor sees all - Quality monitored silently
  7. CEO approves major changes - Human-in-the-loop for critical decisions

Technology Stack

Layer Technology
API Framework FastAPI
Database PostgreSQL + SQLAlchemy (async)
Vector Store PostgreSQL + pgvector (in-house engine)
Cache/Queue Redis
RAG Engine in-house (asyncpg + pgvector, hybrid retrieval)
Embeddings qwen3-embedding:0.6b (Ollama)
Local LLM Ollama (glm-5.2:cloud)
Cloud LLM Claude API (Anthropic) + xAI Grok (official grok CLI, SuperGrok subscription) + OpenAI (official codex CLI, ChatGPT subscription) + Google Gemini (official gemini CLI, OAuth login)
Package Manager uv

Status

Core Infrastructure (Complete)

  • Data models (Pydantic)
  • Database ORM (SQLAlchemy async)
  • Task lifecycle state machine
  • Multi-agent workspace management
  • Agent prompts (25 agents)
  • Messaging API
  • Task API with full lifecycle
  • Git operations API
  • RAG/Knowledge base (in-house pgvector engine)
  • Agent orchestrator
  • CEO approval workflow
  • Pluggable agent providers (Claude Code + xAI Grok + OpenAI Codex + Google Gemini, each on its official CLI)
  • Inbound PR review (read-only PR-reviewer + CEO supersede/dismiss queue)
  • Self-healing CI loop for RoboCo's own repo (default-off, CEO-gated)
  • Business Goals tab with a live Company Scorecard (delivery, spend-vs-budget, lead time)

In Progress

  • Frontend panel (vendored under panel/, served through nginx on :3000)
  • Full agent autonomy testing

Security

Important

Do not expose RoboCo to the public internet as-is. It is designed to run on a trusted private network (homelab / LAN).

Agent authentication. Requests identify the caller with X-Agent-Id / X-Agent-Role headers. The orchestrator issues each spawned agent an HMAC token (X-Agent-Token, signed with ROBOCO_AGENT_AUTH_SECRET) that binds its id, role and team. Token enforcement is gated by ROBOCO_AGENT_AUTH_REQUIRED:

  • ROBOCO_AGENT_AUTH_REQUIRED unset/false (default): header-trust mode — the role headers are accepted without a token, so any client that can reach the API may claim any role (including ceo). The API logs a warning at startup in this mode. Acceptable only on a trusted network.
  • ROBOCO_AGENT_AUTH_REQUIRED=true: every request must carry a valid token; an agent cannot spoof another agent's role. The control panel keeps working because nginx — the only trusted hop between the browser and the API — injects the CEO token (X-Agent-Token) on /api and /ws, so the browser never holds the signing secret. Generate that token with make panel-token and set it as ROBOCO_PANEL_AGENT_TOKEN in .env before enabling secure mode.

WebSocket streams. Token enforcement is currently REST-only. The /ws/* endpoints authenticate by agent_id query param at most and do not yet validate X-Agent-Token, even in secure mode — nginx injects the token so the panel works, but a direct WebSocket connection that bypasses nginx is not rejected. In particular the operator stream /ws/system (rate-limit lifecycle + token-usage snapshots for the dashboard) is unauthenticated. These streams are read-only — no control surface, secrets, or task content — but treat the orchestrator port as trusted-network-only until WebSocket auth lands.

Secrets (the Fernet ROBOCO_ENCRYPTION_KEY, GitHub PATs) live encrypted in the database and in gitignored env files — never in the repo. Per-project git tokens are Fernet-encrypted at rest and never returned by the API.

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Renzo Franceschini

RoboCo is licensed under the GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 (AGPL-3.0). See LICENSE for the full text.

The AGPL's network-use clause (section 13) means that if you run a modified version of RoboCo as a network service, you must make your modified source available to its users. This keeps the project open while preventing closed, hosted re-distributions.

Contributing

Contributions are welcome. All contributors must sign the Contributor License Agreement (CLA.md) — this is automated on your first pull request. See CONTRIBUTING.md for the workflow and why the CLA exists.

S
Description
No description provided
Readme AGPL-3.0
100 MiB
Languages
Python 80.8%
TypeScript 17%
HTML 0.8%
Shell 0.6%
JavaScript 0.3%
Other 0.5%