mirror of
https://github.com/SuperClaude-Org/SuperClaude_Framework.git
synced 2025-12-18 02:06:36 +00:00
150 lines
5.6 KiB
Markdown
150 lines
5.6 KiB
Markdown
# PM Agent Improvement Implementation - 2025-10-14
|
|
|
|
## Implemented Improvements
|
|
|
|
### 1. Self-Correcting Execution (Root Cause First) ✅
|
|
|
|
**Core Change**: Never retry the same approach without understanding WHY it failed.
|
|
|
|
**Implementation**:
|
|
- 6-step error detection protocol
|
|
- Mandatory root cause investigation (context7, WebFetch, Grep, Read)
|
|
- Hypothesis formation before solution attempt
|
|
- Solution must be DIFFERENT from previous attempts
|
|
- Learning capture for future reference
|
|
|
|
**Anti-Patterns Explicitly Forbidden**:
|
|
- ❌ "エラーが出た。もう一回やってみよう"
|
|
- ❌ Retry 1, 2, 3 times with same approach
|
|
- ❌ "Warningあるけど動くからOK"
|
|
|
|
**Correct Patterns Enforced**:
|
|
- ✅ Error → Investigate official docs
|
|
- ✅ Understand root cause → Design different solution
|
|
- ✅ Document learning → Prevent future recurrence
|
|
|
|
### 2. Warning/Error Investigation Culture ✅
|
|
|
|
**Core Principle**: 全ての警告・エラーに興味を持って調査する
|
|
|
|
**Implementation**:
|
|
- Zero tolerance for dismissal
|
|
- Mandatory investigation protocol (context7 + WebFetch)
|
|
- Impact categorization (Critical/Important/Informational)
|
|
- Documentation requirement for all decisions
|
|
|
|
**Quality Mindset**:
|
|
- Warnings = Future technical debt
|
|
- "Works now" ≠ "Production ready"
|
|
- Thorough investigation = Higher code quality
|
|
- Every warning is a learning opportunity
|
|
|
|
### 3. Memory Key Schema (Standardized) ✅
|
|
|
|
**Pattern**: `[category]/[subcategory]/[identifier]`
|
|
|
|
**Inspiration**: Kubernetes namespaces, Git refs, Prometheus metrics
|
|
|
|
**Categories Defined**:
|
|
- `session/`: Session lifecycle management
|
|
- `plan/`: Planning phase (hypothesis, architecture, rationale)
|
|
- `execution/`: Do phase (experiments, errors, solutions)
|
|
- `evaluation/`: Check phase (analysis, metrics, lessons)
|
|
- `learning/`: Knowledge capture (patterns, solutions, mistakes)
|
|
- `project/`: Project understanding (context, architecture, conventions)
|
|
|
|
**Benefits**:
|
|
- Consistent naming across all memory operations
|
|
- Easy to query and retrieve related memories
|
|
- Clear organization for knowledge management
|
|
- Inspired by proven OSS practices
|
|
|
|
### 4. PDCA Document Structure (Normalized) ✅
|
|
|
|
**Location**: `docs/pdca/[feature-name]/`
|
|
|
|
**Structure** (明確・わかりやすい):
|
|
```
|
|
docs/pdca/[feature-name]/
|
|
├── plan.md # Plan: 仮説・設計
|
|
├── do.md # Do: 実験・試行錯誤
|
|
├── check.md # Check: 評価・分析
|
|
└── act.md # Act: 改善・次アクション
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Templates Provided**:
|
|
- plan.md: Hypothesis, Expected Outcomes, Risks
|
|
- do.md: Implementation log (時系列), Learnings
|
|
- check.md: Results vs Expectations, What worked/failed
|
|
- act.md: Success patterns, Global rule updates, Checklist updates
|
|
|
|
**Lifecycle**:
|
|
1. Start → Create plan.md
|
|
2. Work → Update do.md continuously
|
|
3. Complete → Create check.md
|
|
4. Success → Formalize to docs/patterns/ + create act.md
|
|
5. Failure → Move to docs/mistakes/ + create act.md with prevention
|
|
|
|
## User Feedback Integration
|
|
|
|
### Key Insights from User:
|
|
1. **同じ方法を繰り返すからループする** → Root cause analysis mandatory
|
|
2. **警告を興味を持って調べる癖** → Zero tolerance culture implemented
|
|
3. **スキーマ未定義なら定義すべき** → Kubernetes-inspired schema added
|
|
4. **plan/do/check/actでわかりやすい** → PDCA structure normalized
|
|
5. **OSS参考にアイデアをパクる** → Kubernetes, Git, Prometheus patterns adopted
|
|
|
|
### Philosophy Embedded:
|
|
- "間違いを理解してから再試行" (Understand before retry)
|
|
- "警告 = 将来の技術的負債" (Warnings = Future debt)
|
|
- "コード品質向上 = 徹底調査文化" (Quality = Investigation culture)
|
|
- "アイデアに著作権なし" (Ideas are free to adopt)
|
|
|
|
## Expected Impact
|
|
|
|
### Code Quality:
|
|
- ✅ Fewer repeated errors (root cause analysis)
|
|
- ✅ Proactive technical debt prevention (warning investigation)
|
|
- ✅ Higher test coverage and security compliance
|
|
- ✅ Consistent documentation and knowledge capture
|
|
|
|
### Developer Experience:
|
|
- ✅ Clear PDCA structure (plan/do/check/act)
|
|
- ✅ Standardized memory keys (easy to use)
|
|
- ✅ Learning captured systematically
|
|
- ✅ Patterns reusable across projects
|
|
|
|
### Long-term Benefits:
|
|
- ✅ Continuous improvement culture
|
|
- ✅ Knowledge accumulation over sessions
|
|
- ✅ Reduced time on repeated mistakes
|
|
- ✅ Higher quality autonomous execution
|
|
|
|
## Next Steps
|
|
|
|
1. **Test in Real Usage**: Apply PM Agent to actual feature implementation
|
|
2. **Validate Improvements**: Measure error recovery cycles, warning handling
|
|
3. **Iterate Based on Results**: Refine based on real-world performance
|
|
4. **Document Success Cases**: Build example library of PDCA cycles
|
|
5. **Upstream Contribution**: After validation, contribute to SuperClaude
|
|
|
|
## Files Modified
|
|
|
|
- `superclaude/commands/pm.md`:
|
|
- Added "Self-Correcting Execution (Root Cause First)" section
|
|
- Added "Warning/Error Investigation Culture" section
|
|
- Added "Memory Key Schema (Standardized)" section
|
|
- Added "PDCA Document Structure (Normalized)" section
|
|
- ~260 lines of detailed implementation guidance
|
|
|
|
## Implementation Quality
|
|
|
|
- ✅ User feedback directly incorporated
|
|
- ✅ Real-world practices from Kubernetes, Git, Prometheus
|
|
- ✅ Clear anti-patterns and correct patterns defined
|
|
- ✅ Concrete examples and templates provided
|
|
- ✅ Japanese and English mixed (user preference respected)
|
|
- ✅ Philosophical principles embedded in implementation
|
|
|
|
This improvement represents a fundamental shift from "retry on error" to "understand then solve" approach, which should dramatically improve PM Agent's code quality and learning capabilities.
|