Compare commits

..

119 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jesse Vincent
131c1f189f Release v4.0.2: Make slash commands user-only
- Added disable-model-invocation to /brainstorm, /execute-plan, /write-plan
- Commands now restricted to manual user invocation only
- Underlying skills remain available for autonomous invocation
2025-12-23 23:03:31 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
9baedaa117 Make slash commands user-only with disable-model-invocation
Added disable-model-invocation: true to /brainstorm, /execute-plan, and
/write-plan commands. Claude can still invoke the underlying skills
directly, but the slash commands are now restricted to manual user
invocation only.
2025-12-23 23:03:19 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
66a2dbd80a Add automation-over-documentation guidance to writing-skills
Mechanical constraints should be automated, not documented—save skills
for judgment calls.

Based on insight from @EthanJStark in PR #146.
2025-12-23 23:03:19 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
1455ac0631 Add GitHub thread reply guidance to receiving-code-review
When replying to inline review comments, use the thread API rather than
posting top-level PR comments.

Based on feedback from @ralphbean in PR #79.
2025-12-23 23:03:19 -08:00
egornomic
e64ad670df fix: inherit agent model (#144) 2025-12-23 21:46:15 -08:00
Mike Harrison
c037dcbf4b fix: use git check-ignore for worktree gitignore verification (#160)
* fix: use git check-ignore for worktree gitignore verification

The using-git-worktrees skill previously used grep to check only the
local .gitignore file, missing patterns in global gitignore configurations
(core.excludesfile). This caused unnecessary modifications to local
.gitignore when the directory was already globally ignored.

Changed verification from grep to git check-ignore, which respects Git's
full ignore hierarchy (local, global, and system gitignore files).

Fixes obra/superpowers#101

Tested with: Subagent pressure scenarios verifying correct behavior with
global gitignore configuration. Baseline test confirmed the bug, post-fix
test confirmed correct behavior.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* style: convert bold emphasis to headings in Common Mistakes section

Convert **Title** patterns to ### Title headings for markdown lint
compliance (MD036 - no emphasis as heading).

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-12-23 11:26:33 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
a7a8c08c02 Clarify that Skill tool loads skill content directly
Fixes pattern where Claude would invoke a skill then try to Read the
file separately. The Skill tool already provides the content.

- Add "How to Access Skills" section to using-superpowers
- Change "read the skill" → "invoke the skill"
- Commands now use fully qualified names (superpowers:brainstorming etc)
2025-12-22 14:27:35 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
80643c2604 Update README for v4.0.0 skill consolidations and two-stage review 2025-12-17 18:07:40 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
95c6e16336 Prepare v4.0.0 release
- Rewrite release notes centering new features (two-stage review,
  debugging tools, test infrastructure)
- Bump version to 4.0.0 in plugin.json and marketplace.json
- Remove .claude/settings.local.json from tracking
- Add .claude/ to .gitignore
2025-12-17 16:45:35 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
612fbcdd01 Tweak the brainstorming skill to try to improve triggering 2025-12-17 16:44:52 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
70bf3a9e7f Bump version to v4.0.0 2025-12-17 16:44:52 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
c2125b41e3 Update v3.7.0 release notes with all changes since v3.6.2 2025-12-17 16:44:52 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
ae0ef56b44 Add skill triggering test framework
Creates tests/skill-triggering/ to validate skills trigger correctly from
naive prompts (without explicitly naming the skill). Tests 6 skills:
- systematic-debugging
- test-driven-development
- writing-plans
- dispatching-parallel-agents
- executing-plans
- requesting-code-review

All 6 tests pass - skills trigger correctly based on their descriptions.
2025-12-17 16:44:52 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
030a222af1 Fix skill descriptions: remove workflow summaries that override flowcharts
Testing revealed that descriptions summarizing workflow cause Claude to
follow the description instead of reading the skill body. Changed all
descriptions to "when to use" triggers only:

- dispatching-parallel-agents: 2+ independent tasks without shared state
- executing-plans: have a written plan to execute with review checkpoints
- requesting-code-review: completing tasks, features, or before merging
- systematic-debugging: encountering bugs before proposing fixes
- test-driven-development: implementing features before writing code
- writing-plans: have spec/requirements for multi-step task before coding
- writing-skills: updated with "description trap" documentation

The description trap: workflow summaries in descriptions create shortcuts
Claude takes, skipping the skill body entirely.
2025-12-17 16:44:52 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
2a19be0b78 Document skill description trap: descriptions override flowcharts
Testing revealed that skill descriptions summarizing workflow cause
Claude to follow the description instead of reading the skill body.

- A description saying "code review between tasks" caused ONE review
- The flowchart clearly showed TWO reviews (spec compliance + quality)
- Minimal description ("Use when...") correctly deferred to flowchart

Updated writing-skills with:
- "Description = When to Use, NOT What the Skill Does" section
- Cautionary tale about this actual failure
- Examples of good (triggers only) vs bad (workflow summary) descriptions

Updated subagent-driven-development:
- Removed workflow summary from description
- Now just: "Use when executing implementation plans..."

Updated test runner:
- Added --dangerously-skip-permissions for automated testing
2025-12-17 16:44:52 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
cd83439bb2 Add .claude settings to scaffolds for auto-approved permissions 2025-12-17 16:44:52 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
ed06dcbe27 Fix skill description to match flowchart: two-stage review (spec then quality) 2025-12-17 16:44:52 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
baef5241aa Add test suite for subagent-driven-development skill
Two test projects for validating the skill with full end-to-end runs:
- go-fractals: 10 tasks, CLI tool with Sierpinski and Mandelbrot
- svelte-todo: 12 tasks, CRUD app with localStorage and Playwright

Each test has design.md, plan.md, and scaffold.sh. Run with:
  ./tests/subagent-driven-dev/run-test.sh go-fractals
2025-12-17 16:44:51 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
28ba020000 Add render-graphs.js tool for visualizing skill flowcharts 2025-12-17 16:44:51 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
a9b94ae5d7 Rewrite subagent-driven-development with executable flowcharts
- Add graphviz/dot flowcharts as primary executable instructions
- Extract prompt templates to separate collateral files:
  - ./implementer-prompt.md
  - ./spec-reviewer-prompt.md
  - ./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md
- Use qualified skill names (superpowers:skill-name)
- Make flowchart labels explicit and action-oriented
- Add "When to Use" decision flowchart
- Keep detailed prose as supporting content
2025-12-17 16:44:51 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
5845b52747 Consolidate debugging techniques into systematic-debugging skill
Move condition-based-waiting, defense-in-depth, and root-cause-tracing
into systematic-debugging as progressive disclosure supporting files.

These techniques are now available as reference material within the
systematic-debugging skill directory, reducing skill count while keeping
content accessible when needed.

Note: Claude Code's SLASH_COMMAND_TOOL_CHAR_BUDGET env variable silently
limits skill discovery, which drove this consolidation to ensure core
skills remain visible.
2025-12-17 16:44:51 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
3f725ff0d4 Strengthen brainstorming skill trigger and add skill priority guidance
- Update brainstorming description to use imperative "You MUST use this"
- Clarify trigger: "before any creative work - creating features, building
  components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior"
- Add Skill Priority section to using-superpowers to ensure process skills
  (brainstorming, debugging) are invoked before implementation skills
2025-12-17 16:44:51 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
b57c27d815 Integrate testing-skills-with-subagents into writing-skills
- Moved testing-skills-with-subagents to writing-skills/testing-skills-with-subagents.md
- Moved examples/ directory to writing-skills/examples/
- Updated writing-skills to reference via @testing-skills-with-subagents.md
- Updated README to reflect consolidation
- Removed standalone skill (now a supporting reference)
2025-12-17 16:44:51 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
718ec45d33 Integrate testing-anti-patterns into test-driven-development
- Moved testing-anti-patterns to test-driven-development/testing-anti-patterns.md
- Added reference in TDD skill for progressive disclosure
- Updated README to reflect consolidation
- Removed standalone skill (now a supporting reference)
2025-12-17 16:44:51 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
c7caee5647 Remove obsolete sharing-skills skill
The contribution workflow is now via standard GitHub PR process,
not a dedicated skill. The skill was documenting an old workflow
that no longer applies.
2025-12-17 16:44:51 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
1f611f5c0c Add v3.7.0 release notes for dev branch changes 2025-12-17 16:44:51 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
2d7408d0c6 Improve using-superpowers skill to prevent rationalization failures
Tested against claude -p with multiple scenarios. Key fixes:
- Clarify skill check comes BEFORE ANY response including clarifications
- Add rationalizations: "I need more context first", "Let me explore first", "This feels productive"
- Flowchart entry point now "User message received" → clearer blocking gate
- Shorter, more scannable format (flowchart + table)

Verified: "Fix login bug" now triggers systematic-debugging first
2025-12-17 16:44:51 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
9464a51779 Add comprehensive testing documentation
Documents:
- How to run integration tests
- subagent-driven-development test details
- Token analysis tool usage
- Troubleshooting common issues
- Writing new integration tests
- Session transcript format
2025-12-17 16:44:51 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
faa65e7163 Add token usage analysis to subagent-driven-development test
- Rewrote analyze-token-usage.py to parse main session file correctly
- Extracts usage from toolUseResult fields for each subagent
- Shows breakdown by agent with descriptions
- Integrated into test-subagent-driven-development-integration.sh
- Displays token usage automatically after each test run
2025-12-17 16:44:50 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
24ca8cd9d5 fix: verify skill usage via session transcript not text output
The skill instructions are internal and don't appear in user-facing
output. Updated verification to parse the session JSONL transcript
and check for actual tool usage:
- Skill tool invocation
- Task tool (subagents)
- TodoWrite (tracking)
- Implementation results
2025-12-17 16:44:50 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
8fbeca830a test: use bypassPermissions mode for unrestricted testing
dontAsk mode was auto-denying Write tool. Use bypassPermissions
instead to allow full tool access in this controlled test environment.
2025-12-17 16:44:50 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
67de772d7f test: auto-approve permissions with --permission-mode dontAsk
Headless tests need automatic permission approval to write files.
Using dontAsk mode to auto-approve permissions for test directory.
2025-12-17 16:44:50 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
cf72863792 test: add --add-dir flag for temp directory access
Claude needs explicit permission to access the temp test directory.
Added --add-dir flag to grant access to the test project.
2025-12-17 16:44:50 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
baa23b16bb test: show Claude output in real-time during integration test
Use tee instead of redirection so test output is visible during
execution while still being saved to file for analysis.
2025-12-17 16:44:50 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
0aba33be1c fix: run integration test from superpowers dir to access local dev skills
The superpowers-dev marketplace makes skills available only when running
from the plugin directory. Updated test to run claude from superpowers
directory while working on the test project.
2025-12-17 16:44:50 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
06310d6f5f Fix tests to use --allowed-tools flag
Claude Code headless mode requires --allowed-tools flag to actually
execute tool calls. Without it, Claude only responds as if it's doing
things but doesn't actually use tools.

Changes:
- Updated run_claude helper to accept allowed_tools parameter
- Updated integration test to use --allowed-tools=all
- This enables actual tool execution (Write, Task, Bash, etc.)

Now the integration test should actually execute the workflow instead
of just talking about it.
2025-12-17 16:44:50 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
dc11a093c3 Fix syntax error in integration test
Simplified command substitution to avoid shell parsing issues.
Instead of nested heredoc in command substitution, write prompt
to file first then read it.
2025-12-17 16:44:50 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
fa946ae465 Add integration test for subagent-driven-development
Created full end-to-end integration test that executes a real plan
and verifies the new workflow improvements actually work.

New test: test-subagent-driven-development-integration.sh
- Creates real Node.js test project
- Generates implementation plan (2 tasks)
- Executes using subagent-driven-development skill
- Verifies 8 key behaviors:
  1. Plan read once at beginning (not per task)
  2. Full task text provided to subagents (not file reading)
  3. Subagents perform self-review
  4. Spec compliance review before code quality
  5. Spec reviewer reads code independently
  6. Working implementation produced
  7. Tests pass
  8. No extra features added (spec compliance)

Integration tests are opt-in (--integration flag) due to 10-30 min runtime.

Updated run-skill-tests.sh:
- Added --integration flag
- Separates fast tests from integration tests
- Shows note when integration tests skipped

Updated README with integration test documentation.

Run with:
  ./run-skill-tests.sh                # Fast tests only
  ./run-skill-tests.sh --integration  # Include integration tests
2025-12-17 16:44:50 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
51a171cd14 Add Claude Code skills test framework
Created automated test suite for testing superpowers skills using
Claude Code CLI in headless mode.

New files:
- tests/claude-code/run-skill-tests.sh - Main test runner
- tests/claude-code/test-helpers.sh - Helper functions for testing
- tests/claude-code/test-subagent-driven-development.sh - First test
- tests/claude-code/README.md - Documentation

Test framework features:
- Run Claude Code with prompts and capture output
- Assertion helpers (contains, not_contains, count, order)
- Test project creation helpers
- Timeout support (default 5 minutes)
- Verbose mode for debugging
- Specific test selection

First test verifies subagent-driven-development skill:
- Skill loading
- Workflow ordering (spec compliance before code quality)
- Self-review requirements
- Plan reading efficiency (read once)
- Spec compliance reviewer skepticism
- Review loops
- Task context provision

Run with: cd tests/claude-code && ./run-skill-tests.sh
2025-12-17 16:44:50 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
466332f698 Emphasize spec compliance review must complete before code quality
Made sequencing explicit:
- Spec compliance review loop must fully complete () before code quality
- Added "Do NOT proceed to code quality review until spec compliance is "
- Code Quality Review section starts with "Only run after spec compliance review is complete"
- Red Flags: Added "Start code quality review before spec compliance is  (wrong order)"

This ensures we don't waste time reviewing code quality of the wrong
implementation. Verify they built the right thing first, then verify
they built it well.
2025-12-17 16:44:49 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
87afde2390 Make spec compliance reviewer skeptical and verification-focused
The spec compliance reviewer now:
- Does NOT trust implementer's report
- Is warned implementer finished suspiciously quickly
- MUST verify everything by reading actual code
- Compares implementation to requirements line by line
- Reports issues with file:line references

Key additions:
- "Do Not Trust the Report" section
- Explicit DO NOT / DO lists
- "Verify by reading code, not by trusting report"
- Changed "What Was Implemented" to "What Implementer Claims They Built"

This prevents rubber-stamping and ensures independent verification
of spec compliance against actual codebase.
2025-12-17 16:44:49 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
2a6a40fe10 Improve subagent-driven-development workflow
Key improvements based on feedback:

1. Read plan once, not per task
   - Extract all tasks in Step 1
   - Reference extracted tasks in Step 2
   - Eliminates redundant file reading

2. Enable questions during work
   - Not just before, but also while working
   - "It's always OK to ask questions"
   - Don't guess or make assumptions

3. Add self-review before reporting
   - Completeness: implemented everything?
   - Quality: best work, clear names?
   - Discipline: avoided overbuilding?
   - Testing: comprehensive, real behavior?
   - Catches issues before handoff

4. Add spec compliance review
   - Separate reviewer checks: built the right thing?
   - Flags missing requirements
   - Flags extra/unneeded work
   - Flags misunderstandings
   - Runs BEFORE code quality review

5. Make reviews loops, not one-shot
   - Reviewer finds issues
   - Implementer fixes
   - Reviewer reviews again
   - Repeat until approved
   - Applies to both spec and code quality

Two-stage review process:
- Stage 1: Spec compliance (right thing?)
- Stage 2: Code quality (built well?)

This enables subagents to do their best work with clear requirements,
opportunities to clarify, self-critique, and thorough review loops.
2025-12-17 16:44:49 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
97ce1f8fe0 Update subagent-driven-development: controller provides full task text
Changed workflow so controller provides complete task context directly
rather than making subagent read plan file.

Key changes:
- Controller reads plan and extracts full task text
- Controller provides scene-setting context (dependencies, architecture)
- Subagent receives complete information in prompt (no file reading)
- Subagent can ask clarifying questions before beginning work
- Controller handles questions/concerns before subagent proceeds

Benefits:
- No file reading overhead for subagent
- Controller curates exactly what context is needed
- Questions surfaced before work begins (not after)
- Subagent has complete information to do best work

This enables subagents to start with clarity rather than ambiguity.
2025-12-17 16:44:49 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
e7e50ac947 Add skills improvement plan from user feedback
Analyzed feedback from two Claude instances using superpowers in real
development scenarios. Identified 8 core problems and proposed improvements
organized by impact and risk.

Key problems:
- Configuration change verification gap (verify success not intent)
- Background process accumulation across subagents
- Context bloat in subagent prompts
- Missing self-reflection before handoff
- Mock-interface drift
- Code reviewer file access issues
- Skills not being read/enforced
- Fix workflow latency

Proposed improvements organized in 3 phases:
- Phase 1: High-impact, low-risk (do first)
- Phase 2: Moderate changes (test carefully)
- Phase 3: Optimization (validate first)

See plan for detailed analysis and open questions.
2025-12-17 16:44:49 -08:00
Joshua Shanks
5faddc4087 fix codex path in release notes (#155)
Signed-off-by: Joshua Shanks <jjshanks@gmail.com>
2025-12-09 22:44:45 -08:00
Joshua Shanks
d2900eae0c fix: correct context window documentation link (#156)
Update relative link to absolute URL for external Anthropic docs.
2025-12-09 22:44:14 -08:00
Shaan Majid
4ac67830d9 chore: gitignore .claude/settings.local.json (#153)
This file contains machine-specific paths and permissions that cause
warnings when cloning the repo fresh.
2025-12-09 12:02:49 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
154d664373 Release v3.6.2: Fix Linux compatibility in polyglot hook wrapper
Fixed POSIX compatibility issue in hooks/run-hook.cmd that caused
"Bad substitution" errors on Ubuntu/Debian systems where /bin/sh is dash.

Changes:
- Replaced bash-specific ${BASH_SOURCE[0]:-$0} with POSIX-compliant $0
- Tested with both bash and sh (POSIX mode) on macOS
- Updated version to 3.6.2 in all required files

Fixes #141
2025-12-03 10:14:19 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
8462c20cce Release v3.6.1: Fix Windows arg forwarding in polyglot wrapper
- Add validation for missing script name
- Forward up to 8 additional arguments to bash on Windows
- Fixes CodeRabbit review feedback from #134
2025-12-01 16:18:56 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
a0c1e73a1d Release v3.6.0: Add Windows support for plugin hooks
New features:
- Cross-platform polyglot wrapper (run-hook.cmd) for Windows/Unix
- Pure bash JSON escaping for Windows compatibility
- Documentation for polyglot hooks setup
2025-12-01 15:52:36 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
94e9e2596c Add Windows support for plugin hooks (#134)
* feat: Add Windows support for session-start hook

- Create polyglot session-start.cmd that works in both CMD and bash
- Update hooks.json to use the .cmd polyglot launcher
- Replace sed/awk with pure bash for JSON escaping (Windows compatibility)

The polyglot script uses a heredoc trick:
- CMD sees the @echo off block and runs bash.exe with cygpath conversion
- Bash sees a heredoc and skips to the Unix section

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: Add execute permission to session-start.cmd for Unix

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: Add comprehensive polyglot hooks documentation

- Add docs/windows/polyglot-hooks.md explaining the cross-platform technique
- Add reusable run-hook.cmd wrapper for parameterized hook execution
- Document how the polyglot works in CMD vs bash
- Include troubleshooting section and related GitHub issues

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test: Add polyglot hook test script for macOS/Linux

Run ./test-polyglot.sh from repo root to verify:
- Required files exist with execute permissions
- Simple wrapper (session-start.cmd) produces valid JSON
- Parameterized wrapper (run-hook.cmd) works
- Heredoc correctly skips CMD block on Unix

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: Use direct pipe to jq in test to avoid variable escaping issues

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* refactor: Use single reusable run-hook.cmd for all hooks

- Remove session-start.cmd in favor of run-hook.cmd
- Update hooks.json to use: run-hook.cmd session-start.sh
- Simplify test script to only test run-hook.cmd

This makes it easy to add more hooks - just create the .sh file
and add a line to hooks.json pointing to run-hook.cmd with the script name.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: Simplify run-hook.cmd CMD block

Pass path directly to bash instead of using cygpath in a subshell.
The complex quoting was causing issues on Windows.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: Remove test-polyglot.sh

Testing complete - polyglot hooks work on Windows and macOS.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-12-01 15:42:12 -08:00
avleen
1b878e4fa1 Remove model name from core-reviewer (#120) 2025-11-30 13:22:56 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
515c86fd07 tweak: clarify skill tool path 2025-11-29 09:29:31 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
e416a0e105 Revert "feat: echo skill base directory in use-skill"
This reverts commit a08f7de64b.
2025-11-28 22:48:40 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
a08f7de64b feat: echo skill base directory in use-skill 2025-11-28 22:43:02 -08:00
Josh Thomas
207a23e4d5 fix(opencode): Use synthetic: true for invisible content injection (#122)
The OpenCode plugin injects the bootstrap and skill content as visible
user messages. While `noReply: true` prevents an AI response, the
injected content still appears in the chat UI which makes it just a bit
noisy.

OpenCode's `TextPartInput` supports a `synthetic` Boolean property that
hides parts from the UI while keeping them visible to the AI -- it's
been available in the v2 message format since around the v1.0.0 version
bump.
2025-11-26 09:38:35 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
c35c5f637e Update README to be a little more human-written (and mention github sponsors) 2025-11-24 13:13:01 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
9a01a0dcc1 chore: bump version to 3.5.1 2025-11-24 12:29:02 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
8c7826c34d fix(opencode): use session.created event for bootstrap injection
Switch from chat.message hook to session.created event for injecting
the using-superpowers skill content. The new approach:

- Injects at session creation via session.prompt() with noReply: true
- Explicitly tells model the skill is already loaded to prevent
  redundant use_skill calls
- Consolidates bootstrap generation into getBootstrapContent() helper
- Removes fallback pattern in favor of single implementation

Tested with 10 consecutive test runs and manual skill trigger validation.
2025-11-24 12:28:11 -08:00
Stefan Otte
4ae8fc8713 Use more generic "#!/usr/bin/env bash" instead of "#!/bin/bash" (#80)
"#!/bin/bash" does not work with nixos.
2025-11-24 09:45:58 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
94089bdce5 chore: bump version to 3.5.0 2025-11-23 20:04:24 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
9297fd24d5 docs: update release notes with test suite and documentation improvements 2025-11-23 19:52:46 -08:00
Claude
d0806ba5af fix: cleanup remaining code review issues
- Remove unused destructured parameters (project, $, worktree) from plugin
- Add test coverage for checkForUpdates function (error handling cases)
2025-11-24 00:25:26 +00:00
Claude
6ecd72c5bf fix: address code review issues in opencode support branch
- Fix test runner exiting early due to ((var++)) returning 1 with set -e
- Remove duplicate frontmatter stripping in superpowers-codex, use shared skillsCore.stripFrontmatter()
- Remove unused promptsDir/promptFile variables from opencode plugin
- Derive superpowers skills path from __dirname for better install flexibility
- Simplify test-skills-core.sh by removing failing ESM import attempt
2025-11-23 23:37:53 +00:00
Jesse Vincent
f600f969f5 docs: remove duplicate sections and fix conflicting information 2025-11-23 14:51:44 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
4ef2f9185d docs: add using-git-worktrees and subagent-driven-development to workflow 2025-11-23 14:05:59 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
8a626e75f3 docs: rewrite workflow in terms of skills, not commands 2025-11-23 14:01:32 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
014b11cf57 docs: emphasize automatic skill activation over manual commands 2025-11-23 13:57:36 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
3f73365155 docs: add workflow section showing brainstorm→plan→execute→finish flow 2025-11-23 13:55:23 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
9f33fc95bf docs: rewrite README to explain problem, solution, and philosophy clearly 2025-11-23 13:53:53 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
9220bb62af docs: simplify opencode readme instructions to match codex style 2025-11-23 13:50:37 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
f5a4002daf docs: reorganize platform installation docs with inline quick-start and detailed guides 2025-11-23 13:49:12 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
9dcf5eaabe fix: add OPENCODE_CONFIG_DIR for proper test isolation 2025-11-23 13:36:26 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
f3d6c331a1 test: add automated test suite for opencode plugin
Create comprehensive tests in tests/opencode/ that verify the plugin
works correctly in an isolated test environment:

- setup.sh: Creates temp HOME and installs plugin with proper symlinks
- test-plugin-loading.sh: Verifies plugin structure and JavaScript syntax
- test-skills-core.sh: Unit tests for skills-core.js library functions
- test-tools.sh: Integration tests for use_skill/find_skills (requires OpenCode)
- test-priority.sh: Tests project > personal > superpowers priority
- run-tests.sh: Main test runner with options for integration tests

Run basic tests: ./tests/opencode/run-tests.sh
Run all tests: ./tests/opencode/run-tests.sh --integration
2025-11-23 12:28:58 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
b0ba2cf15a docs: update documentation with message insertion and project skills features 2025-11-23 12:14:48 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
cbbd8d2edf docs: add project-local skills documentation 2025-11-23 12:13:19 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
9cd6c52acc feat: use message insertion pattern for persistence and add project skills support
- Add project-local skills directory (.opencode/skills/) with highest priority
- Use client.session.prompt() with noReply for skill loading to persist across compaction
- Add session.compacted event handler to re-inject bootstrap after context compaction
- Update find_skills to list skills from project > personal > superpowers directories
- Support project: prefix for explicit project skill loading
- Keep chat.message hook as fallback for initial context injection
2025-11-23 12:10:41 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
107859a748 refactor: remove prompt file, use automatic chat.message injection
- Delete .opencode/prompts/superpowers.txt (no longer needed)
- Simplify INSTALL.md to remove prompt file copying and agent configuration steps
- Installation now relies on plugin's chat.message hook for automatic context injection
- Cleaner, simpler setup process with fewer manual configuration steps
2025-11-23 10:57:48 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
5f5b789e3e feat: add chat.message hook to inject superpowers context automatically 2025-11-23 10:51:26 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
7db10cf540 docs: add implementation plan 2025-11-22 21:09:07 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
67ce04077b fix: use tool() helper function for proper OpenCode tool definitions 2025-11-22 21:07:57 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
d749c620b5 fix: use tool object instead of tools array per opencode api 2025-11-22 21:04:00 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
aa1fe045c6 refactor: use static prompt file instead of dynamic config hook 2025-11-22 20:59:53 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
368674419a fix: use agent prompts instead of event hooks for context injection
OpenCode doesn't support injecting context through event hooks. Instead,
the plugin now generates a prompt file that agents can reference via
{file:./prompts/superpowers.txt} in their configuration.
2025-11-22 16:13:05 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
c940d84f3d fix: use correct event subscription format for opencode 2025-11-22 15:47:38 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
8e7f90a954 fix: use session.created hook instead of session.started 2025-11-22 15:45:58 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
d92de28150 refactor: convert skills-core and plugin to pure ESM for module compatibility 2025-11-22 13:23:05 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
fa53c8f925 fix: use require inside plugin function to load commonjs module 2025-11-22 13:22:17 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
d3e89e8719 fix: convert opencode plugin to ES module syntax
- Replace CommonJS require() with ES import statements
- Use createRequire() for loading CommonJS skills-core module
- Export plugin as 'SuperpowersPlugin' named export
- Maintains compatibility with existing skills-core.js CommonJS module
2025-11-22 12:53:26 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
b746f7587b docs: fix plugin installation instructions for opencode 2025-11-22 12:50:43 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
4eab16380b refactor: extract frontmatter stripping to shared helper function 2025-11-22 12:41:58 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
7ffff61965 docs: add opencode support to release notes 2025-11-22 12:34:35 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
fbd419e394 docs: add opencode support to readme 2025-11-22 12:34:21 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
a131267d7c docs: add opencode installation guide 2025-11-22 12:34:06 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
26c152b37e feat: implement session.started hook for opencode 2025-11-22 12:31:23 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
6ae8ef4733 feat: implement find_skills tool for opencode 2025-11-22 12:30:48 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
1aa29ad52b feat: implement use_skill tool for opencode 2025-11-22 12:30:20 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
6847cf4cfc feat: create opencode plugin scaffold 2025-11-22 12:29:50 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
425b40359c refactor: remove unused whenToUse references from codex 2025-11-22 12:27:31 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
9e5ba91be6 refactor: use shared checkForUpdates in codex 2025-11-22 12:15:14 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
4abd4df171 refactor: use shared findSkillsInDir in codex 2025-11-22 12:12:59 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
5dd31b90ee refactor: use shared extractFrontmatter in codex 2025-11-22 12:12:01 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
0fbdfa3c4a refactor: import shared skills core in codex 2025-11-22 12:08:53 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
a23eead918 feat: add git update checking to core module 2025-11-22 12:06:53 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
4594596e38 feat: add skill path resolution with shadowing support 2025-11-22 12:04:42 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
536fd24603 feat: add skill discovery function to core module 2025-11-22 12:02:15 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
85effaaedb feat: create shared skills core module with frontmatter parser
Extract frontmatter parsing logic into lib/skills-core.js to enable
code reuse between Codex and OpenCode implementations.
2025-11-22 12:01:15 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
6cec629cf3 Remove unused initialize-skills.sh script
- Deleted lib/initialize-skills.sh (no longer called)
- Removed permission entry from .claude/settings.local.json
2025-11-22 11:36:28 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
5dd8871a1b Add OpenCode support design document
- Native OpenCode plugin approach using their JavaScript plugin system
- Shared core module (lib/skills-core.js) for code reuse with Codex
- Custom tools: use_skill and find_skills
- Session startup hook for automatic bootstrap
- Three-phase implementation plan
2025-11-22 11:36:28 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
84283dfc05 Update GitHub funding configuration 2025-11-21 16:46:32 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
d90334e030 Remove duplicate mis-placed "commands" - Fixes #112 2025-11-20 12:08:17 -06:00
Dave Seleno
9a9618489d fix: yaml error in code-reviewer agent (#115) 2025-11-20 10:03:56 -08:00
Roland Huß
02c87670de Update installation instructions for Claude Code (#90)
Refactor installation instructions for installing the plugin so that it can be easy copied & pasted to the CLI, as Claude code expects each command separately.
2025-11-06 12:44:59 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
b187e75a1e Bump version to 3.4.1 2025-10-31 11:16:48 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
8674dc0868 Optimize superpowers bootstrap to eliminate redundant skill execution
- Update session-start hook to clarify that using-superpowers content is provided directly
- Add explicit guidance to use Skill tool only for other skills
- Prevents confusing loop where agents execute using-superpowers manually
- Reduces overhead and improves user experience

Fixes redundant skill execution in bootstrap workflow.
2025-10-31 10:49:39 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
42d44ceaf9 Fix plugin manifest version to match 3.4.0 release
Update .claude-plugin/plugin.json version from 3.2.3 to 3.4.0 to match
the version already set in marketplace.json. This ensures consistency
across all plugin manifest files.
2025-10-31 09:58:07 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
d46dddd32c Bump plugin version to 3.4.0 2025-10-30 20:28:51 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
b1fa6a1a46 Update release notes for v3.4.0 brainstorming simplification 2025-10-30 20:25:45 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
8e38ab86dc Simplify brainstorming skill to match original vision
Remove heavyweight 6-phase process with formal checklists and return to
conversational approach:
- Natural dialogue instead of structured phases
- One question at a time without rigid progression
- 200-300 word design sections with validation
- Keep documentation and implementation handoff
- Remove AskUserQuestion tool requirements and complex flowcharts

This aligns with the original spec: help turn ideas into designs through
collaborative questioning, then present design in small sections.
2025-10-30 20:21:28 -07:00
81 changed files with 7724 additions and 915 deletions

View File

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
{
"name": "superpowers",
"description": "Core skills library for Claude Code: TDD, debugging, collaboration patterns, and proven techniques",
"version": "3.2.2",
"version": "4.0.2",
"source": "./",
"author": {
"name": "Jesse Vincent",

View File

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
{
"name": "superpowers",
"description": "Core skills library for Claude Code: TDD, debugging, collaboration patterns, and proven techniques",
"version": "3.2.3",
"version": "4.0.2",
"author": {
"name": "Jesse Vincent",
"email": "jesse@fsck.com"

View File

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
const fs = require('fs');
const path = require('path');
const os = require('os');
const { execSync } = require('child_process');
const skillsCore = require('../lib/skills-core');
// Paths
const homeDir = os.homedir();
@@ -13,66 +13,6 @@ const bootstrapFile = path.join(homeDir, '.codex', 'superpowers', '.codex', 'sup
const superpowersRepoDir = path.join(homeDir, '.codex', 'superpowers');
// Utility functions
function checkForUpdates() {
try {
// Quick check with 3 second timeout to avoid delays if network is down
const output = execSync('git fetch origin && git status --porcelain=v1 --branch', {
cwd: superpowersRepoDir,
timeout: 3000,
encoding: 'utf8',
stdio: 'pipe'
});
// Parse git status output to see if we're behind
const statusLines = output.split('\n');
for (const line of statusLines) {
if (line.startsWith('## ') && line.includes('[behind ')) {
return true; // We're behind remote
}
}
return false; // Up to date
} catch (error) {
// Network down, git error, timeout, etc. - don't block bootstrap
return false;
}
}
function extractFrontmatter(filePath) {
try {
const content = fs.readFileSync(filePath, 'utf8');
const lines = content.split('\n');
let inFrontmatter = false;
let name = '';
let description = '';
let whenToUse = '';
for (const line of lines) {
if (line.trim() === '---') {
if (inFrontmatter) break;
inFrontmatter = true;
continue;
}
if (inFrontmatter) {
const match = line.match(/^(\w+):\s*(.*)$/);
if (match) {
const [, key, value] = match;
switch (key) {
case 'name': name = value.trim(); break;
case 'description': description = value.trim(); break;
case 'when_to_use': whenToUse = value.trim(); break;
}
}
}
}
return { name, description, whenToUse };
} catch (error) {
return { name: '', description: '', whenToUse: '' };
}
}
function printSkill(skillPath, sourceType) {
const skillFile = path.join(skillPath, 'SKILL.md');
const relPath = sourceType === 'personal'
@@ -87,48 +27,12 @@ function printSkill(skillPath, sourceType) {
}
// Extract and print metadata
const { name, description, whenToUse } = extractFrontmatter(skillFile);
const { name, description } = skillsCore.extractFrontmatter(skillFile);
if (description) console.log(` ${description}`);
if (whenToUse) console.log(` When to use: ${whenToUse}`);
console.log('');
}
function findSkillsInDir(dir, sourceType, maxDepth = 1) {
const skills = [];
if (!fs.existsSync(dir)) return skills;
function searchDir(currentDir, currentDepth) {
if (currentDepth > maxDepth) return;
try {
const entries = fs.readdirSync(currentDir, { withFileTypes: true });
for (const entry of entries) {
if (entry.isDirectory()) {
const skillDir = path.join(currentDir, entry.name);
const skillFile = path.join(skillDir, 'SKILL.md');
if (fs.existsSync(skillFile)) {
skills.push(skillDir);
}
// For personal skills, search deeper (category/skill structure)
if (sourceType === 'personal' && currentDepth < maxDepth) {
searchDir(skillDir, currentDepth + 1);
}
}
}
} catch (error) {
// Ignore permission errors or other issues
}
}
searchDir(dir, 0);
return skills;
}
// Commands
function runFindSkills() {
console.log('Available skills:');
@@ -138,19 +42,19 @@ function runFindSkills() {
const foundSkills = new Set();
// Find personal skills first (these take precedence)
const personalSkills = findSkillsInDir(personalSkillsDir, 'personal', 2);
for (const skillPath of personalSkills) {
const relPath = path.relative(personalSkillsDir, skillPath);
const personalSkills = skillsCore.findSkillsInDir(personalSkillsDir, 'personal', 2);
for (const skill of personalSkills) {
const relPath = path.relative(personalSkillsDir, skill.path);
foundSkills.add(relPath);
printSkill(skillPath, 'personal');
printSkill(skill.path, 'personal');
}
// Find superpowers skills (only if not already found in personal)
const superpowersSkills = findSkillsInDir(superpowersSkillsDir, 'superpowers', 1);
for (const skillPath of superpowersSkills) {
const relPath = path.relative(superpowersSkillsDir, skillPath);
const superpowersSkills = skillsCore.findSkillsInDir(superpowersSkillsDir, 'superpowers', 1);
for (const skill of superpowersSkills) {
const relPath = path.relative(superpowersSkillsDir, skill.path);
if (!foundSkills.has(relPath)) {
printSkill(skillPath, 'superpowers');
printSkill(skill.path, 'superpowers');
}
}
@@ -171,7 +75,7 @@ function runBootstrap() {
console.log('');
// Check for updates (with timeout protection)
if (checkForUpdates()) {
if (skillsCore.checkForUpdates(superpowersRepoDir)) {
console.log('## Update Available');
console.log('');
console.log('⚠️ Your superpowers installation is behind the latest version.');
@@ -303,35 +207,13 @@ function runUseSkill(skillName) {
return;
}
// Extract frontmatter and content
// Extract frontmatter and content using shared core functions
let content, frontmatter;
try {
const fullContent = fs.readFileSync(skillFile, 'utf8');
const { name, description, whenToUse } = extractFrontmatter(skillFile);
// Extract just the content after frontmatter
const lines = fullContent.split('\n');
let inFrontmatter = false;
let frontmatterEnded = false;
const contentLines = [];
for (const line of lines) {
if (line.trim() === '---') {
if (inFrontmatter) {
frontmatterEnded = true;
continue;
}
inFrontmatter = true;
continue;
}
if (frontmatterEnded || !inFrontmatter) {
contentLines.push(line);
}
}
content = contentLines.join('\n').trim();
frontmatter = { name, description, whenToUse };
const { name, description } = skillsCore.extractFrontmatter(skillFile);
content = skillsCore.stripFrontmatter(fullContent);
frontmatter = { name, description };
} catch (error) {
console.log(`Error reading skill file: ${error.message}`);
return;
@@ -347,10 +229,7 @@ function runUseSkill(skillName) {
if (frontmatter.description) {
console.log(`# ${frontmatter.description}`);
}
if (frontmatter.whenToUse) {
console.log(`# When to use: ${frontmatter.whenToUse}`);
}
console.log(`# Supporting tools and docs are in ${skillDirectory}`);
console.log(`# Skill-specific tools and reference files live in ${skillDirectory}`);
console.log('# ============================================');
console.log('');
@@ -385,4 +264,4 @@ switch (command) {
console.log(' superpowers-codex use-skill superpowers:brainstorming');
console.log(' superpowers-codex use-skill my-custom-skill');
break;
}
}

3
.github/FUNDING.yml vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
# These are supported funding model platforms
github: [obra]

1
.gitignore vendored
View File

@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
.worktrees/
.private-journal/
.claude/

135
.opencode/INSTALL.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
# Installing Superpowers for OpenCode
## Prerequisites
- [OpenCode.ai](https://opencode.ai) installed
- Node.js installed
- Git installed
## Installation Steps
### 1. Install Superpowers
```bash
mkdir -p ~/.config/opencode/superpowers
git clone https://github.com/obra/superpowers.git ~/.config/opencode/superpowers
```
### 2. Register the Plugin
Create a symlink so OpenCode discovers the plugin:
```bash
mkdir -p ~/.config/opencode/plugin
ln -sf ~/.config/opencode/superpowers/.opencode/plugin/superpowers.js ~/.config/opencode/plugin/superpowers.js
```
### 3. Restart OpenCode
Restart OpenCode. The plugin will automatically inject superpowers context via the chat.message hook.
You should see superpowers is active when you ask "do you have superpowers?"
## Usage
### Finding Skills
Use the `find_skills` tool to list all available skills:
```
use find_skills tool
```
### Loading a Skill
Use the `use_skill` tool to load a specific skill:
```
use use_skill tool with skill_name: "superpowers:brainstorming"
```
### Personal Skills
Create your own skills in `~/.config/opencode/skills/`:
```bash
mkdir -p ~/.config/opencode/skills/my-skill
```
Create `~/.config/opencode/skills/my-skill/SKILL.md`:
```markdown
---
name: my-skill
description: Use when [condition] - [what it does]
---
# My Skill
[Your skill content here]
```
Personal skills override superpowers skills with the same name.
### Project Skills
Create project-specific skills in your OpenCode project:
```bash
# In your OpenCode project
mkdir -p .opencode/skills/my-project-skill
```
Create `.opencode/skills/my-project-skill/SKILL.md`:
```markdown
---
name: my-project-skill
description: Use when [condition] - [what it does]
---
# My Project Skill
[Your skill content here]
```
**Skill Priority:** Project skills override personal skills, which override superpowers skills.
**Skill Naming:**
- `project:skill-name` - Force project skill lookup
- `skill-name` - Searches project → personal → superpowers
- `superpowers:skill-name` - Force superpowers skill lookup
## Updating
```bash
cd ~/.config/opencode/superpowers
git pull
```
## Troubleshooting
### Plugin not loading
1. Check plugin file exists: `ls ~/.config/opencode/superpowers/.opencode/plugin/superpowers.js`
2. Check OpenCode logs for errors
3. Verify Node.js is installed: `node --version`
### Skills not found
1. Verify skills directory exists: `ls ~/.config/opencode/superpowers/skills`
2. Use `find_skills` tool to see what's discovered
3. Check file structure: each skill should have a `SKILL.md` file
### Tool mapping issues
When a skill references a Claude Code tool you don't have:
- `TodoWrite` → use `update_plan`
- `Task` with subagents → use `@mention` syntax to invoke OpenCode subagents
- `Skill` → use `use_skill` tool
- File operations → use your native tools
## Getting Help
- Report issues: https://github.com/obra/superpowers/issues
- Documentation: https://github.com/obra/superpowers

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,215 @@
/**
* Superpowers plugin for OpenCode.ai
*
* Provides custom tools for loading and discovering skills,
* with prompt generation for agent configuration.
*/
import path from 'path';
import fs from 'fs';
import os from 'os';
import { fileURLToPath } from 'url';
import { tool } from '@opencode-ai/plugin/tool';
import * as skillsCore from '../../lib/skills-core.js';
const __dirname = path.dirname(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url));
export const SuperpowersPlugin = async ({ client, directory }) => {
const homeDir = os.homedir();
const projectSkillsDir = path.join(directory, '.opencode/skills');
// Derive superpowers skills dir from plugin location (works for both symlinked and local installs)
const superpowersSkillsDir = path.resolve(__dirname, '../../skills');
const personalSkillsDir = path.join(homeDir, '.config/opencode/skills');
// Helper to generate bootstrap content
const getBootstrapContent = (compact = false) => {
const usingSuperpowersPath = skillsCore.resolveSkillPath('using-superpowers', superpowersSkillsDir, personalSkillsDir);
if (!usingSuperpowersPath) return null;
const fullContent = fs.readFileSync(usingSuperpowersPath.skillFile, 'utf8');
const content = skillsCore.stripFrontmatter(fullContent);
const toolMapping = compact
? `**Tool Mapping:** TodoWrite->update_plan, Task->@mention, Skill->use_skill
**Skills naming (priority order):** project: > personal > superpowers:`
: `**Tool Mapping for OpenCode:**
When skills reference tools you don't have, substitute OpenCode equivalents:
- \`TodoWrite\`\`update_plan\`
- \`Task\` tool with subagents → Use OpenCode's subagent system (@mention)
- \`Skill\` tool → \`use_skill\` custom tool
- \`Read\`, \`Write\`, \`Edit\`, \`Bash\` → Your native tools
**Skills naming (priority order):**
- Project skills: \`project:skill-name\` (in .opencode/skills/)
- Personal skills: \`skill-name\` (in ~/.config/opencode/skills/)
- Superpowers skills: \`superpowers:skill-name\`
- Project skills override personal, which override superpowers when names match`;
return `<EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>
You have superpowers.
**IMPORTANT: The using-superpowers skill content is included below. It is ALREADY LOADED - you are currently following it. Do NOT use the use_skill tool to load "using-superpowers" - that would be redundant. Use use_skill only for OTHER skills.**
${content}
${toolMapping}
</EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>`;
};
// Helper to inject bootstrap via session.prompt
const injectBootstrap = async (sessionID, compact = false) => {
const bootstrapContent = getBootstrapContent(compact);
if (!bootstrapContent) return false;
try {
await client.session.prompt({
path: { id: sessionID },
body: {
noReply: true,
parts: [{ type: "text", text: bootstrapContent, synthetic: true }]
}
});
return true;
} catch (err) {
return false;
}
};
return {
tool: {
use_skill: tool({
description: 'Load and read a specific skill to guide your work. Skills contain proven workflows, mandatory processes, and expert techniques.',
args: {
skill_name: tool.schema.string().describe('Name of the skill to load (e.g., "superpowers:brainstorming", "my-custom-skill", or "project:my-skill")')
},
execute: async (args, context) => {
const { skill_name } = args;
// Resolve with priority: project > personal > superpowers
// Check for project: prefix first
const forceProject = skill_name.startsWith('project:');
const actualSkillName = forceProject ? skill_name.replace(/^project:/, '') : skill_name;
let resolved = null;
// Try project skills first (if project: prefix or no prefix)
if (forceProject || !skill_name.startsWith('superpowers:')) {
const projectPath = path.join(projectSkillsDir, actualSkillName);
const projectSkillFile = path.join(projectPath, 'SKILL.md');
if (fs.existsSync(projectSkillFile)) {
resolved = {
skillFile: projectSkillFile,
sourceType: 'project',
skillPath: actualSkillName
};
}
}
// Fall back to personal/superpowers resolution
if (!resolved && !forceProject) {
resolved = skillsCore.resolveSkillPath(skill_name, superpowersSkillsDir, personalSkillsDir);
}
if (!resolved) {
return `Error: Skill "${skill_name}" not found.\n\nRun find_skills to see available skills.`;
}
const fullContent = fs.readFileSync(resolved.skillFile, 'utf8');
const { name, description } = skillsCore.extractFrontmatter(resolved.skillFile);
const content = skillsCore.stripFrontmatter(fullContent);
const skillDirectory = path.dirname(resolved.skillFile);
const skillHeader = `# ${name || skill_name}
# ${description || ''}
# Supporting tools and docs are in ${skillDirectory}
# ============================================`;
// Insert as user message with noReply for persistence across compaction
try {
await client.session.prompt({
path: { id: context.sessionID },
body: {
noReply: true,
parts: [
{ type: "text", text: `Loading skill: ${name || skill_name}`, synthetic: true },
{ type: "text", text: `${skillHeader}\n\n${content}`, synthetic: true }
]
}
});
} catch (err) {
// Fallback: return content directly if message insertion fails
return `${skillHeader}\n\n${content}`;
}
return `Launching skill: ${name || skill_name}`;
}
}),
find_skills: tool({
description: 'List all available skills in the project, personal, and superpowers skill libraries.',
args: {},
execute: async (args, context) => {
const projectSkills = skillsCore.findSkillsInDir(projectSkillsDir, 'project', 3);
const personalSkills = skillsCore.findSkillsInDir(personalSkillsDir, 'personal', 3);
const superpowersSkills = skillsCore.findSkillsInDir(superpowersSkillsDir, 'superpowers', 3);
// Priority: project > personal > superpowers
const allSkills = [...projectSkills, ...personalSkills, ...superpowersSkills];
if (allSkills.length === 0) {
return 'No skills found. Install superpowers skills to ~/.config/opencode/superpowers/skills/ or add project skills to .opencode/skills/';
}
let output = 'Available skills:\n\n';
for (const skill of allSkills) {
let namespace;
switch (skill.sourceType) {
case 'project':
namespace = 'project:';
break;
case 'personal':
namespace = '';
break;
default:
namespace = 'superpowers:';
}
const skillName = skill.name || path.basename(skill.path);
output += `${namespace}${skillName}\n`;
if (skill.description) {
output += ` ${skill.description}\n`;
}
output += ` Directory: ${skill.path}\n\n`;
}
return output;
}
})
},
event: async ({ event }) => {
// Extract sessionID from various event structures
const getSessionID = () => {
return event.properties?.info?.id ||
event.properties?.sessionID ||
event.session?.id;
};
// Inject bootstrap at session creation (before first user message)
if (event.type === 'session.created') {
const sessionID = getSessionID();
if (sessionID) {
await injectBootstrap(sessionID, false);
}
}
// Re-inject bootstrap after context compaction (compact version to save tokens)
if (event.type === 'session.compacted') {
const sessionID = getSessionID();
if (sessionID) {
await injectBootstrap(sessionID, true);
}
}
}
};
};

145
README.md
View File

@@ -1,94 +1,112 @@
# Superpowers
A comprehensive skills library of proven techniques, patterns, and workflows for AI coding assistants.
Superpowers is a complete software development workflow for your coding agents, built on top of a set of composable "skills" and some initial instructions that make sure your agent uses them.
## What You Get
## How it works
- **Testing Skills** - TDD, async testing, anti-patterns
- **Debugging Skills** - Systematic debugging, root cause tracing, verification
- **Collaboration Skills** - Brainstorming, planning, code review, parallel agents
- **Development Skills** - Git worktrees, finishing branches, subagent workflows
- **Meta Skills** - Creating, testing, and sharing skills
It starts from the moment you fire up your coding agent. As soon as it sees that you're building something, it *doesn't* just jump into trying to write code. Instead, it steps back and asks you what you're really trying to do.
Plus:
- **Slash Commands** - `/superpowers:brainstorm`, `/superpowers:write-plan`, `/superpowers:execute-plan`
- **Automatic Integration** - Skills activate automatically when relevant
- **Consistent Workflows** - Systematic approaches to common engineering tasks
Once it's teased a spec out of the conversation, it shows it to you in chunks short enough to actually read and digest.
## Learn More
After you've signed off on the design, your agent puts together an implementation plan that's clear enough for an enthusiastic junior engineer with poor taste, no judgement, no project context, and an aversion to testing to follow. It emphasizes true red/green TDD, YAGNI (You Aren't Gonna Need It), and DRY.
Next up, once you say "go", it launches a *subagent-driven-development* process, having agents work through each engineering task, inspecting and reviewing their work, and continuing forward. It's not uncommon for Claude to be able to work autonomously for a couple hours at a time without deviating from the plan you put together.
There's a bunch more to it, but that's the core of the system. And because the skills trigger automatically, you don't need to do anything special. Your coding agent just has Superpowers.
## Sponsorship
If Superpowers has helped you do stuff that makes money and you are so inclined, I'd greatly appreciate it if you'd consider [sponsoring my opensource work](https://github.com/sponsors/obra).
Thanks!
- Jesse
Read the introduction: [Superpowers for Claude Code](https://blog.fsck.com/2025/10/09/superpowers/)
## Installation
**Note:** Installation differs by platform. Claude Code has a built-in plugin system. Codex and OpenCode require manual setup.
### Claude Code (via Plugin Marketplace)
In Claude Code, register the marketplace first:
```bash
# In Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add obra/superpowers-marketplace
```
Then install the plugin from this marketplace:
```bash
/plugin install superpowers@superpowers-marketplace
```
### Verify Installation
```bash
# Check that commands appear
/help
Check that commands appear:
```bash
/help
```
```
# Should see:
# /superpowers:brainstorm - Interactive design refinement
# /superpowers:write-plan - Create implementation plan
# /superpowers:execute-plan - Execute plan in batches
```
### Codex (Experimental)
### Codex
**Note:** Codex support is experimental and may require refinement based on user feedback.
Tell Codex:
Tell Codex to fetch https://raw.githubusercontent.com/obra/superpowers/refs/heads/main/.codex/INSTALL.md and follow the instructions.
## Quick Start
### Using Slash Commands
**Brainstorm a design:**
```
/superpowers:brainstorm
Fetch and follow instructions from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/obra/superpowers/refs/heads/main/.codex/INSTALL.md
```
**Create an implementation plan:**
**Detailed docs:** [docs/README.codex.md](docs/README.codex.md)
### OpenCode
Tell OpenCode:
```
/superpowers:write-plan
Fetch and follow instructions from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/obra/superpowers/refs/heads/main/.opencode/INSTALL.md
```
**Execute the plan:**
```
/superpowers:execute-plan
```
**Detailed docs:** [docs/README.opencode.md](docs/README.opencode.md)
### Automatic Skill Activation
## The Basic Workflow
Skills activate automatically when relevant. For example:
- `test-driven-development` activates when implementing features
- `systematic-debugging` activates when debugging issues
- `verification-before-completion` activates before claiming work is done
1. **brainstorming** - Activates before writing code. Refines rough ideas through questions, explores alternatives, presents design in sections for validation. Saves design document.
2. **using-git-worktrees** - Activates after design approval. Creates isolated workspace on new branch, runs project setup, verifies clean test baseline.
3. **writing-plans** - Activates with approved design. Breaks work into bite-sized tasks (2-5 minutes each). Every task has exact file paths, complete code, verification steps.
4. **subagent-driven-development** or **executing-plans** - Activates with plan. Dispatches fresh subagent per task with two-stage review (spec compliance, then code quality), or executes in batches with human checkpoints.
5. **test-driven-development** - Activates during implementation. Enforces RED-GREEN-REFACTOR: write failing test, watch it fail, write minimal code, watch it pass, commit. Deletes code written before tests.
6. **requesting-code-review** - Activates between tasks. Reviews against plan, reports issues by severity. Critical issues block progress.
7. **finishing-a-development-branch** - Activates when tasks complete. Verifies tests, presents options (merge/PR/keep/discard), cleans up worktree.
**The agent checks for relevant skills before any task.** Mandatory workflows, not suggestions.
## What's Inside
### Skills Library
**Testing** (`skills/testing/`)
- **test-driven-development** - RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle
- **condition-based-waiting** - Async test patterns
- **testing-anti-patterns** - Common pitfalls to avoid
**Testing**
- **test-driven-development** - RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle (includes testing anti-patterns reference)
**Debugging** (`skills/debugging/`)
- **systematic-debugging** - 4-phase root cause process
- **root-cause-tracing** - Find the real problem
**Debugging**
- **systematic-debugging** - 4-phase root cause process (includes root-cause-tracing, defense-in-depth, condition-based-waiting techniques)
- **verification-before-completion** - Ensure it's actually fixed
- **defense-in-depth** - Multiple validation layers
**Collaboration** (`skills/collaboration/`)
**Collaboration**
- **brainstorming** - Socratic design refinement
- **writing-plans** - Detailed implementation plans
- **executing-plans** - Batch execution with checkpoints
@@ -97,36 +115,20 @@ Skills activate automatically when relevant. For example:
- **receiving-code-review** - Responding to feedback
- **using-git-worktrees** - Parallel development branches
- **finishing-a-development-branch** - Merge/PR decision workflow
- **subagent-driven-development** - Fast iteration with quality gates
- **subagent-driven-development** - Fast iteration with two-stage review (spec compliance, then code quality)
**Meta** (`skills/meta/`)
- **writing-skills** - Create new skills following best practices
- **sharing-skills** - Contribute skills back via branch and PR
- **testing-skills-with-subagents** - Validate skill quality
**Meta**
- **writing-skills** - Create new skills following best practices (includes testing methodology)
- **using-superpowers** - Introduction to the skills system
### Commands
All commands are thin wrappers that activate the corresponding skill:
- **brainstorm.md** - Activates the `brainstorming` skill
- **write-plan.md** - Activates the `writing-plans` skill
- **execute-plan.md** - Activates the `executing-plans` skill
## How It Works
1. **SessionStart Hook** - Loads the `using-superpowers` skill at session start
2. **Skills System** - Uses Claude Code's first-party skills system
3. **Automatic Discovery** - Claude finds and uses relevant skills for your task
4. **Mandatory Workflows** - When a skill exists for your task, using it becomes required
## Philosophy
- **Test-Driven Development** - Write tests first, always
- **Systematic over ad-hoc** - Process over guessing
- **Complexity reduction** - Simplicity as primary goal
- **Evidence over claims** - Verify before declaring success
- **Domain over implementation** - Work at problem level, not solution level
Read more: [Superpowers for Claude Code](https://blog.fsck.com/2025/10/09/superpowers/)
## Contributing
@@ -134,11 +136,10 @@ Skills live directly in this repository. To contribute:
1. Fork the repository
2. Create a branch for your skill
3. Follow the `writing-skills` skill for creating new skills
4. Use the `testing-skills-with-subagents` skill to validate quality
5. Submit a PR
3. Follow the `writing-skills` skill for creating and testing new skills
4. Submit a PR
See `skills/meta/writing-skills/SKILL.md` for the complete guide.
See `skills/writing-skills/SKILL.md` for the complete guide.
## Updating

View File

@@ -1,5 +1,186 @@
# Superpowers Release Notes
## v4.0.2 (2025-12-23)
### Fixes
**Slash commands now user-only**
Added `disable-model-invocation: true` to all three slash commands (`/brainstorm`, `/execute-plan`, `/write-plan`). Claude can no longer invoke these commands via the Skill tool—they're restricted to manual user invocation only.
The underlying skills (`superpowers:brainstorming`, `superpowers:executing-plans`, `superpowers:writing-plans`) remain available for Claude to invoke autonomously. This change prevents confusion when Claude would invoke a command that just redirects to a skill anyway.
## v4.0.1 (2025-12-23)
### Fixes
**Clarified how to access skills in Claude Code**
Fixed a confusing pattern where Claude would invoke a skill via the Skill tool, then try to Read the skill file separately. The `using-superpowers` skill now explicitly states that the Skill tool loads skill content directly—no need to read files.
- Added "How to Access Skills" section to `using-superpowers`
- Changed "read the skill" → "invoke the skill" in instructions
- Updated slash commands to use fully qualified skill names (e.g., `superpowers:brainstorming`)
**Added GitHub thread reply guidance to receiving-code-review** (h/t @ralphbean)
Added a note about replying to inline review comments in the original thread rather than as top-level PR comments.
**Added automation-over-documentation guidance to writing-skills** (h/t @EthanJStark)
Added guidance that mechanical constraints should be automated, not documented—save skills for judgment calls.
## v4.0.0 (2025-12-17)
### New Features
**Two-stage code review in subagent-driven-development**
Subagent workflows now use two separate review stages after each task:
1. **Spec compliance review** - Skeptical reviewer verifies implementation matches spec exactly. Catches missing requirements AND over-building. Won't trust implementer's report—reads actual code.
2. **Code quality review** - Only runs after spec compliance passes. Reviews for clean code, test coverage, maintainability.
This catches the common failure mode where code is well-written but doesn't match what was requested. Reviews are loops, not one-shot: if reviewer finds issues, implementer fixes them, then reviewer checks again.
Other subagent workflow improvements:
- Controller provides full task text to workers (not file references)
- Workers can ask clarifying questions before AND during work
- Self-review checklist before reporting completion
- Plan read once at start, extracted to TodoWrite
New prompt templates in `skills/subagent-driven-development/`:
- `implementer-prompt.md` - Includes self-review checklist, encourages questions
- `spec-reviewer-prompt.md` - Skeptical verification against requirements
- `code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md` - Standard code review
**Debugging techniques consolidated with tools**
`systematic-debugging` now bundles supporting techniques and tools:
- `root-cause-tracing.md` - Trace bugs backward through call stack
- `defense-in-depth.md` - Add validation at multiple layers
- `condition-based-waiting.md` - Replace arbitrary timeouts with condition polling
- `find-polluter.sh` - Bisection script to find which test creates pollution
- `condition-based-waiting-example.ts` - Complete implementation from real debugging session
**Testing anti-patterns reference**
`test-driven-development` now includes `testing-anti-patterns.md` covering:
- Testing mock behavior instead of real behavior
- Adding test-only methods to production classes
- Mocking without understanding dependencies
- Incomplete mocks that hide structural assumptions
**Skill test infrastructure**
Three new test frameworks for validating skill behavior:
`tests/skill-triggering/` - Validates skills trigger from naive prompts without explicit naming. Tests 6 skills to ensure descriptions alone are sufficient.
`tests/claude-code/` - Integration tests using `claude -p` for headless testing. Verifies skill usage via session transcript (JSONL) analysis. Includes `analyze-token-usage.py` for cost tracking.
`tests/subagent-driven-dev/` - End-to-end workflow validation with two complete test projects:
- `go-fractals/` - CLI tool with Sierpinski/Mandelbrot (10 tasks)
- `svelte-todo/` - CRUD app with localStorage and Playwright (12 tasks)
### Major Changes
**DOT flowcharts as executable specifications**
Rewrote key skills using DOT/GraphViz flowcharts as the authoritative process definition. Prose becomes supporting content.
**The Description Trap** (documented in `writing-skills`): Discovered that skill descriptions override flowchart content when descriptions contain workflow summaries. Claude follows the short description instead of reading the detailed flowchart. Fix: descriptions must be trigger-only ("Use when X") with no process details.
**Skill priority in using-superpowers**
When multiple skills apply, process skills (brainstorming, debugging) now explicitly come before implementation skills. "Build X" triggers brainstorming first, then domain skills.
**brainstorming trigger strengthened**
Description changed to imperative: "You MUST use this before any creative work—creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior."
### Breaking Changes
**Skill consolidation** - Six standalone skills merged:
- `root-cause-tracing`, `defense-in-depth`, `condition-based-waiting` → bundled in `systematic-debugging/`
- `testing-skills-with-subagents` → bundled in `writing-skills/`
- `testing-anti-patterns` → bundled in `test-driven-development/`
- `sharing-skills` removed (obsolete)
### Other Improvements
- **render-graphs.js** - Tool to extract DOT diagrams from skills and render to SVG
- **Rationalizations table** in using-superpowers - Scannable format including new entries: "I need more context first", "Let me explore first", "This feels productive"
- **docs/testing.md** - Guide to testing skills with Claude Code integration tests
---
## v3.6.2 (2025-12-03)
### Fixed
- **Linux Compatibility**: Fixed polyglot hook wrapper (`run-hook.cmd`) to use POSIX-compliant syntax
- Replaced bash-specific `${BASH_SOURCE[0]:-$0}` with standard `$0` on line 16
- Resolves "Bad substitution" error on Ubuntu/Debian systems where `/bin/sh` is dash
- Fixes #141
---
## v3.5.1 (2025-11-24)
### Changed
- **OpenCode Bootstrap Refactor**: Switched from `chat.message` hook to `session.created` event for bootstrap injection
- Bootstrap now injects at session creation via `session.prompt()` with `noReply: true`
- Explicitly tells the model that using-superpowers is already loaded to prevent redundant skill loading
- Consolidated bootstrap content generation into shared `getBootstrapContent()` helper
- Cleaner single-implementation approach (removed fallback pattern)
---
## v3.5.0 (2025-11-23)
### Added
- **OpenCode Support**: Native JavaScript plugin for OpenCode.ai
- Custom tools: `use_skill` and `find_skills`
- Message insertion pattern for skill persistence across context compaction
- Automatic context injection via chat.message hook
- Auto re-injection on session.compacted events
- Three-tier skill priority: project > personal > superpowers
- Project-local skills support (`.opencode/skills/`)
- Shared core module (`lib/skills-core.js`) for code reuse with Codex
- Automated test suite with proper isolation (`tests/opencode/`)
- Platform-specific documentation (`docs/README.opencode.md`, `docs/README.codex.md`)
### Changed
- **Refactored Codex Implementation**: Now uses shared `lib/skills-core.js` ES module
- Eliminates code duplication between Codex and OpenCode
- Single source of truth for skill discovery and parsing
- Codex successfully loads ES modules via Node.js interop
- **Improved Documentation**: Rewrote README to explain problem/solution clearly
- Removed duplicate sections and conflicting information
- Added complete workflow description (brainstorm → plan → execute → finish)
- Simplified platform installation instructions
- Emphasized skill-checking protocol over automatic activation claims
---
## v3.4.1 (2025-10-31)
### Improvements
- Optimized superpowers bootstrap to eliminate redundant skill execution. The `using-superpowers` skill content is now provided directly in session context, with clear guidance to use the Skill tool only for other skills. This reduces overhead and prevents the confusing loop where agents would execute `using-superpowers` manually despite already having the content from session start.
## v3.4.0 (2025-10-30)
### Improvements
- Simplified `brainstorming` skill to return to original conversational vision. Removed heavyweight 6-phase process with formal checklists in favor of natural dialogue: ask questions one at a time, then present design in 200-300 word sections with validation. Keeps documentation and implementation handoff features.
## v3.3.1 (2025-10-28)
### Improvements
@@ -33,9 +214,9 @@
- Updated terminology: "Superpowers skills" instead of "Core skills"
### Files Added
- `codex/INSTALL.md` - Installation guide for Codex users
- `codex/superpowers-bootstrap.md` - Bootstrap instructions with Codex adaptations
- `scripts/superpowers-codex` - Unified Node.js executable with all functionality
- `.codex/INSTALL.md` - Installation guide for Codex users
- `.codex/superpowers-bootstrap.md` - Bootstrap instructions with Codex adaptations
- `.codex/superpowers-codex` - Unified Node.js executable with all functionality
**Note:** Codex support is experimental. The integration provides core superpowers functionality but may require refinement based on user feedback.

View File

@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
---
name: code-reviewer
description: Use this agent when a major project step has been completed and needs to be reviewed against the original plan and coding standards. Examples: <example>Context: The user is creating a code-review agent that should be called after a logical chunk of code is written. user: "I've finished implementing the user authentication system as outlined in step 3 of our plan" assistant: "Great work! Now let me use the code-reviewer agent to review the implementation against our plan and coding standards" <commentary>Since a major project step has been completed, use the code-reviewer agent to validate the work against the plan and identify any issues.</commentary></example> <example>Context: User has completed a significant feature implementation. user: "The API endpoints for the task management system are now complete - that covers step 2 from our architecture document" assistant: "Excellent! Let me have the code-reviewer agent examine this implementation to ensure it aligns with our plan and follows best practices" <commentary>A numbered step from the planning document has been completed, so the code-reviewer agent should review the work.</commentary></example>
model: sonnet
description: |
Use this agent when a major project step has been completed and needs to be reviewed against the original plan and coding standards. Examples: <example>Context: The user is creating a code-review agent that should be called after a logical chunk of code is written. user: "I've finished implementing the user authentication system as outlined in step 3 of our plan" assistant: "Great work! Now let me use the code-reviewer agent to review the implementation against our plan and coding standards" <commentary>Since a major project step has been completed, use the code-reviewer agent to validate the work against the plan and identify any issues.</commentary></example> <example>Context: User has completed a significant feature implementation. user: "The API endpoints for the task management system are now complete - that covers step 2 from our architecture document" assistant: "Excellent! Let me have the code-reviewer agent examine this implementation to ensure it aligns with our plan and follows best practices" <commentary>A numbered step from the planning document has been completed, so the code-reviewer agent should review the work.</commentary></example>
model: inherit
---
You are a Senior Code Reviewer with expertise in software architecture, design patterns, and best practices. Your role is to review completed project steps against original plans and ensure code quality standards are met.

View File

@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
---
description: Interactive design refinement using Socratic method
description: "You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores requirements and design before implementation."
disable-model-invocation: true
---
Use and follow the brainstorming skill exactly as written
Invoke the superpowers:brainstorming skill and follow it exactly as presented to you

View File

@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
---
description: Execute plan in batches with review checkpoints
disable-model-invocation: true
---
Use the executing-plans skill exactly as written
Invoke the superpowers:executing-plans skill and follow it exactly as presented to you

View File

@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
---
description: Create detailed implementation plan with bite-sized tasks
disable-model-invocation: true
---
Use the writing-plans skill exactly as written
Invoke the superpowers:writing-plans skill and follow it exactly as presented to you

153
docs/README.codex.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
# Superpowers for Codex
Complete guide for using Superpowers with OpenAI Codex.
## Quick Install
Tell Codex:
```
Fetch and follow instructions from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/obra/superpowers/refs/heads/main/.codex/INSTALL.md
```
## Manual Installation
### Prerequisites
- OpenAI Codex access
- Shell access to install files
### Installation Steps
#### 1. Clone Superpowers
```bash
mkdir -p ~/.codex/superpowers
git clone https://github.com/obra/superpowers.git ~/.codex/superpowers
```
#### 2. Install Bootstrap
The bootstrap file is included in the repository at `.codex/superpowers-bootstrap.md`. Codex will automatically use it from the cloned location.
#### 3. Verify Installation
Tell Codex:
```
Run ~/.codex/superpowers/.codex/superpowers-codex find-skills to show available skills
```
You should see a list of available skills with descriptions.
## Usage
### Finding Skills
```
Run ~/.codex/superpowers/.codex/superpowers-codex find-skills
```
### Loading a Skill
```
Run ~/.codex/superpowers/.codex/superpowers-codex use-skill superpowers:brainstorming
```
### Bootstrap All Skills
```
Run ~/.codex/superpowers/.codex/superpowers-codex bootstrap
```
This loads the complete bootstrap with all skill information.
### Personal Skills
Create your own skills in `~/.codex/skills/`:
```bash
mkdir -p ~/.codex/skills/my-skill
```
Create `~/.codex/skills/my-skill/SKILL.md`:
```markdown
---
name: my-skill
description: Use when [condition] - [what it does]
---
# My Skill
[Your skill content here]
```
Personal skills override superpowers skills with the same name.
## Architecture
### Codex CLI Tool
**Location:** `~/.codex/superpowers/.codex/superpowers-codex`
A Node.js CLI script that provides three commands:
- `bootstrap` - Load complete bootstrap with all skills
- `use-skill <name>` - Load a specific skill
- `find-skills` - List all available skills
### Shared Core Module
**Location:** `~/.codex/superpowers/lib/skills-core.js`
The Codex implementation uses the shared `skills-core` module (ES module format) for skill discovery and parsing. This is the same module used by the OpenCode plugin, ensuring consistent behavior across platforms.
### Tool Mapping
Skills written for Claude Code are adapted for Codex with these mappings:
- `TodoWrite``update_plan`
- `Task` with subagents → Tell user subagents aren't available, do work directly
- `Skill` tool → `~/.codex/superpowers/.codex/superpowers-codex use-skill`
- File operations → Native Codex tools
## Updating
```bash
cd ~/.codex/superpowers
git pull
```
## Troubleshooting
### Skills not found
1. Verify installation: `ls ~/.codex/superpowers/skills`
2. Check CLI works: `~/.codex/superpowers/.codex/superpowers-codex find-skills`
3. Verify skills have SKILL.md files
### CLI script not executable
```bash
chmod +x ~/.codex/superpowers/.codex/superpowers-codex
```
### Node.js errors
The CLI script requires Node.js. Verify:
```bash
node --version
```
Should show v14 or higher (v18+ recommended for ES module support).
## Getting Help
- Report issues: https://github.com/obra/superpowers/issues
- Main documentation: https://github.com/obra/superpowers
- Blog post: https://blog.fsck.com/2025/10/27/skills-for-openai-codex/
## Note
Codex support is experimental and may require refinement based on user feedback. If you encounter issues, please report them on GitHub.

234
docs/README.opencode.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
# Superpowers for OpenCode
Complete guide for using Superpowers with [OpenCode.ai](https://opencode.ai).
## Quick Install
Tell OpenCode:
```
Clone https://github.com/obra/superpowers to ~/.config/opencode/superpowers, then create directory ~/.config/opencode/plugin, then symlink ~/.config/opencode/superpowers/.opencode/plugin/superpowers.js to ~/.config/opencode/plugin/superpowers.js, then restart opencode.
```
## Manual Installation
### Prerequisites
- [OpenCode.ai](https://opencode.ai) installed
- Node.js installed
- Git installed
### Installation Steps
#### 1. Install Superpowers
```bash
mkdir -p ~/.config/opencode/superpowers
git clone https://github.com/obra/superpowers.git ~/.config/opencode/superpowers
```
#### 2. Register the Plugin
OpenCode discovers plugins from `~/.config/opencode/plugin/`. Create a symlink:
```bash
mkdir -p ~/.config/opencode/plugin
ln -sf ~/.config/opencode/superpowers/.opencode/plugin/superpowers.js ~/.config/opencode/plugin/superpowers.js
```
Alternatively, for project-local installation:
```bash
# In your OpenCode project
mkdir -p .opencode/plugin
ln -sf ~/.config/opencode/superpowers/.opencode/plugin/superpowers.js .opencode/plugin/superpowers.js
```
#### 3. Restart OpenCode
Restart OpenCode to load the plugin. Superpowers will automatically activate.
## Usage
### Finding Skills
Use the `find_skills` tool to list all available skills:
```
use find_skills tool
```
### Loading a Skill
Use the `use_skill` tool to load a specific skill:
```
use use_skill tool with skill_name: "superpowers:brainstorming"
```
Skills are automatically inserted into the conversation and persist across context compaction.
### Personal Skills
Create your own skills in `~/.config/opencode/skills/`:
```bash
mkdir -p ~/.config/opencode/skills/my-skill
```
Create `~/.config/opencode/skills/my-skill/SKILL.md`:
```markdown
---
name: my-skill
description: Use when [condition] - [what it does]
---
# My Skill
[Your skill content here]
```
### Project Skills
Create project-specific skills in your OpenCode project:
```bash
# In your OpenCode project
mkdir -p .opencode/skills/my-project-skill
```
Create `.opencode/skills/my-project-skill/SKILL.md`:
```markdown
---
name: my-project-skill
description: Use when [condition] - [what it does]
---
# My Project Skill
[Your skill content here]
```
## Skill Priority
Skills are resolved with this priority order:
1. **Project skills** (`.opencode/skills/`) - Highest priority
2. **Personal skills** (`~/.config/opencode/skills/`)
3. **Superpowers skills** (`~/.config/opencode/superpowers/skills/`)
You can force resolution to a specific level:
- `project:skill-name` - Force project skill
- `skill-name` - Search project → personal → superpowers
- `superpowers:skill-name` - Force superpowers skill
## Features
### Automatic Context Injection
The plugin automatically injects superpowers context via the chat.message hook on every session. No manual configuration needed.
### Message Insertion Pattern
When you load a skill with `use_skill`, it's inserted as a user message with `noReply: true`. This ensures skills persist throughout long conversations, even when OpenCode compacts context.
### Compaction Resilience
The plugin listens for `session.compacted` events and automatically re-injects the core superpowers bootstrap to maintain functionality after context compaction.
### Tool Mapping
Skills written for Claude Code are automatically adapted for OpenCode. The plugin provides mapping instructions:
- `TodoWrite``update_plan`
- `Task` with subagents → OpenCode's `@mention` system
- `Skill` tool → `use_skill` custom tool
- File operations → Native OpenCode tools
## Architecture
### Plugin Structure
**Location:** `~/.config/opencode/superpowers/.opencode/plugin/superpowers.js`
**Components:**
- Two custom tools: `use_skill`, `find_skills`
- chat.message hook for initial context injection
- event handler for session.compacted re-injection
- Uses shared `lib/skills-core.js` module (also used by Codex)
### Shared Core Module
**Location:** `~/.config/opencode/superpowers/lib/skills-core.js`
**Functions:**
- `extractFrontmatter()` - Parse skill metadata
- `stripFrontmatter()` - Remove metadata from content
- `findSkillsInDir()` - Recursive skill discovery
- `resolveSkillPath()` - Skill resolution with shadowing
- `checkForUpdates()` - Git update detection
This module is shared between OpenCode and Codex implementations for code reuse.
## Updating
```bash
cd ~/.config/opencode/superpowers
git pull
```
Restart OpenCode to load the updates.
## Troubleshooting
### Plugin not loading
1. Check plugin file exists: `ls ~/.config/opencode/superpowers/.opencode/plugin/superpowers.js`
2. Check symlink: `ls -l ~/.config/opencode/plugin/superpowers.js`
3. Check OpenCode logs: `opencode run "test" --print-logs --log-level DEBUG`
4. Look for: `service=plugin path=file:///.../superpowers.js loading plugin`
### Skills not found
1. Verify skills directory: `ls ~/.config/opencode/superpowers/skills`
2. Use `find_skills` tool to see what's discovered
3. Check skill structure: each skill needs a `SKILL.md` file
### Tools not working
1. Verify plugin loaded: Check OpenCode logs for plugin loading message
2. Check Node.js version: The plugin requires Node.js for ES modules
3. Test plugin manually: `node --input-type=module -e "import('file://~/.config/opencode/plugin/superpowers.js').then(m => console.log(Object.keys(m)))"`
### Context not injecting
1. Check if chat.message hook is working
2. Verify using-superpowers skill exists
3. Check OpenCode version (requires recent version with plugin support)
## Getting Help
- Report issues: https://github.com/obra/superpowers/issues
- Main documentation: https://github.com/obra/superpowers
- OpenCode docs: https://opencode.ai/docs/
## Testing
The implementation includes an automated test suite at `tests/opencode/`:
```bash
# Run all tests
./tests/opencode/run-tests.sh --integration --verbose
# Run specific test
./tests/opencode/run-tests.sh --test test-tools.sh
```
Tests verify:
- Plugin loading
- Skills-core library functionality
- Tool execution (use_skill, find_skills)
- Skill priority resolution
- Proper isolation with temp HOME

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,294 @@
# OpenCode Support Design
**Date:** 2025-11-22
**Author:** Bot & Jesse
**Status:** Design Complete, Awaiting Implementation
## Overview
Add full superpowers support for OpenCode.ai using a native OpenCode plugin architecture that shares core functionality with the existing Codex implementation.
## Background
OpenCode.ai is a coding agent similar to Claude Code and Codex. Previous attempts to port superpowers to OpenCode (PR #93, PR #116) used file-copying approaches. This design takes a different approach: building a native OpenCode plugin using their JavaScript/TypeScript plugin system while sharing code with the Codex implementation.
### Key Differences Between Platforms
- **Claude Code**: Native Anthropic plugin system + file-based skills
- **Codex**: No plugin system → bootstrap markdown + CLI script
- **OpenCode**: JavaScript/TypeScript plugins with event hooks and custom tools API
### OpenCode's Agent System
- **Primary agents**: Build (default, full access) and Plan (restricted, read-only)
- **Subagents**: General (research, searching, multi-step tasks)
- **Invocation**: Automatic dispatch by primary agents OR manual `@mention` syntax
- **Configuration**: Custom agents in `opencode.json` or `~/.config/opencode/agent/`
## Architecture
### High-Level Structure
1. **Shared Core Module** (`lib/skills-core.js`)
- Common skill discovery and parsing logic
- Used by both Codex and OpenCode implementations
2. **Platform-Specific Wrappers**
- Codex: CLI script (`.codex/superpowers-codex`)
- OpenCode: Plugin module (`.opencode/plugin/superpowers.js`)
3. **Skill Directories**
- Core: `~/.config/opencode/superpowers/skills/` (or installed location)
- Personal: `~/.config/opencode/skills/` (shadows core skills)
### Code Reuse Strategy
Extract common functionality from `.codex/superpowers-codex` into shared module:
```javascript
// lib/skills-core.js
module.exports = {
extractFrontmatter(filePath), // Parse name + description from YAML
findSkillsInDir(dir, maxDepth), // Recursive SKILL.md discovery
findAllSkills(dirs), // Scan multiple directories
resolveSkillPath(skillName, dirs), // Handle shadowing (personal > core)
checkForUpdates(repoDir) // Git fetch/status check
};
```
### Skill Frontmatter Format
Current format (no `when_to_use` field):
```yaml
---
name: skill-name
description: Use when [condition] - [what it does]; [additional context]
---
```
## OpenCode Plugin Implementation
### Custom Tools
**Tool 1: `use_skill`**
Loads a specific skill's content into the conversation (equivalent to Claude's Skill tool).
```javascript
{
name: 'use_skill',
description: 'Load and read a specific skill to guide your work',
schema: z.object({
skill_name: z.string().describe('Name of skill (e.g., "superpowers:brainstorming")')
}),
execute: async ({ skill_name }) => {
const { skillPath, content, frontmatter } = resolveAndReadSkill(skill_name);
const skillDir = path.dirname(skillPath);
return `# ${frontmatter.name}
# ${frontmatter.description}
# Supporting tools and docs are in ${skillDir}
# ============================================
${content}`;
}
}
```
**Tool 2: `find_skills`**
Lists all available skills with metadata.
```javascript
{
name: 'find_skills',
description: 'List all available skills',
schema: z.object({}),
execute: async () => {
const skills = discoverAllSkills();
return skills.map(s =>
`${s.namespace}:${s.name}
${s.description}
Directory: ${s.directory}
`).join('\n');
}
}
```
### Session Startup Hook
When a new session starts (`session.started` event):
1. **Inject using-superpowers content**
- Full content of the using-superpowers skill
- Establishes mandatory workflows
2. **Run find_skills automatically**
- Display full list of available skills upfront
- Include skill directories for each
3. **Inject tool mapping instructions**
```markdown
**Tool Mapping for OpenCode:**
When skills reference tools you don't have, substitute:
- `TodoWrite` → `update_plan`
- `Task` with subagents → Use OpenCode subagent system (@mention)
- `Skill` tool → `use_skill` custom tool
- Read, Write, Edit, Bash → Your native equivalents
**Skill directories contain:**
- Supporting scripts (run with bash)
- Additional documentation (read with read tool)
- Utilities specific to that skill
```
4. **Check for updates** (non-blocking)
- Quick git fetch with timeout
- Notify if updates available
### Plugin Structure
```javascript
// .opencode/plugin/superpowers.js
const skillsCore = require('../../lib/skills-core');
const path = require('path');
const fs = require('fs');
const { z } = require('zod');
export const SuperpowersPlugin = async ({ client, directory, $ }) => {
const superpowersDir = path.join(process.env.HOME, '.config/opencode/superpowers');
const personalDir = path.join(process.env.HOME, '.config/opencode/skills');
return {
'session.started': async () => {
const usingSuperpowers = await readSkill('using-superpowers');
const skillsList = await findAllSkills();
const toolMapping = getToolMappingInstructions();
return {
context: `${usingSuperpowers}\n\n${skillsList}\n\n${toolMapping}`
};
},
tools: [
{
name: 'use_skill',
description: 'Load and read a specific skill',
schema: z.object({
skill_name: z.string()
}),
execute: async ({ skill_name }) => {
// Implementation using skillsCore
}
},
{
name: 'find_skills',
description: 'List all available skills',
schema: z.object({}),
execute: async () => {
// Implementation using skillsCore
}
}
]
};
};
```
## File Structure
```
superpowers/
├── lib/
│ └── skills-core.js # NEW: Shared skill logic
├── .codex/
│ ├── superpowers-codex # UPDATED: Use skills-core
│ ├── superpowers-bootstrap.md
│ └── INSTALL.md
├── .opencode/
│ ├── plugin/
│ │ └── superpowers.js # NEW: OpenCode plugin
│ └── INSTALL.md # NEW: Installation guide
└── skills/ # Unchanged
```
## Implementation Plan
### Phase 1: Refactor Shared Core
1. Create `lib/skills-core.js`
- Extract frontmatter parsing from `.codex/superpowers-codex`
- Extract skill discovery logic
- Extract path resolution (with shadowing)
- Update to use only `name` and `description` (no `when_to_use`)
2. Update `.codex/superpowers-codex` to use shared core
- Import from `../lib/skills-core.js`
- Remove duplicated code
- Keep CLI wrapper logic
3. Test Codex implementation still works
- Verify bootstrap command
- Verify use-skill command
- Verify find-skills command
### Phase 2: Build OpenCode Plugin
1. Create `.opencode/plugin/superpowers.js`
- Import shared core from `../../lib/skills-core.js`
- Implement plugin function
- Define custom tools (use_skill, find_skills)
- Implement session.started hook
2. Create `.opencode/INSTALL.md`
- Installation instructions
- Directory setup
- Configuration guidance
3. Test OpenCode implementation
- Verify session startup bootstrap
- Verify use_skill tool works
- Verify find_skills tool works
- Verify skill directories are accessible
### Phase 3: Documentation & Polish
1. Update README with OpenCode support
2. Add OpenCode installation to main docs
3. Update RELEASE-NOTES
4. Test both Codex and OpenCode work correctly
## Next Steps
1. **Create isolated workspace** (using git worktrees)
- Branch: `feature/opencode-support`
2. **Follow TDD where applicable**
- Test shared core functions
- Test skill discovery and parsing
- Integration tests for both platforms
3. **Incremental implementation**
- Phase 1: Refactor shared core + update Codex
- Verify Codex still works before moving on
- Phase 2: Build OpenCode plugin
- Phase 3: Documentation and polish
4. **Testing strategy**
- Manual testing with real OpenCode installation
- Verify skill loading, directories, scripts work
- Test both Codex and OpenCode side-by-side
- Verify tool mappings work correctly
5. **PR and merge**
- Create PR with complete implementation
- Test in clean environment
- Merge to main
## Benefits
- **Code reuse**: Single source of truth for skill discovery/parsing
- **Maintainability**: Bug fixes apply to both platforms
- **Extensibility**: Easy to add future platforms (Cursor, Windsurf, etc.)
- **Native integration**: Uses OpenCode's plugin system properly
- **Consistency**: Same skill experience across all platforms

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,711 @@
# Skills Improvements from User Feedback
**Date:** 2025-11-28
**Status:** Draft
**Source:** Two Claude instances using superpowers in real development scenarios
---
## Executive Summary
Two Claude instances provided detailed feedback from actual development sessions. Their feedback reveals **systematic gaps** in current skills that allowed preventable bugs to ship despite following the skills.
**Critical insight:** These are problem reports, not just solution proposals. The problems are real; the solutions need careful evaluation.
**Key themes:**
1. **Verification gaps** - We verify operations succeed but not that they achieve intended outcomes
2. **Process hygiene** - Background processes accumulate and interfere across subagents
3. **Context optimization** - Subagents get too much irrelevant information
4. **Self-reflection missing** - No prompt to critique own work before handoff
5. **Mock safety** - Mocks can drift from interfaces without detection
6. **Skill activation** - Skills exist but aren't being read/used
---
## Problems Identified
### Problem 1: Configuration Change Verification Gap
**What happened:**
- Subagent tested "OpenAI integration"
- Set `OPENAI_API_KEY` env var
- Got status 200 responses
- Reported "OpenAI integration working"
- **BUT** response contained `"model": "claude-sonnet-4-20250514"` - was actually using Anthropic
**Root cause:**
`verification-before-completion` checks operations succeed but not that outcomes reflect intended configuration changes.
**Impact:** High - False confidence in integration tests, bugs ship to production
**Example failure pattern:**
- Switch LLM provider → verify status 200 but don't check model name
- Enable feature flag → verify no errors but don't check feature is active
- Change environment → verify deployment succeeds but don't check environment vars
---
### Problem 2: Background Process Accumulation
**What happened:**
- Multiple subagents dispatched during session
- Each started background server processes
- Processes accumulated (4+ servers running)
- Stale processes still bound to ports
- Later E2E test hit stale server with wrong config
- Confusing/incorrect test results
**Root cause:**
Subagents are stateless - don't know about previous subagents' processes. No cleanup protocol.
**Impact:** Medium-High - Tests hit wrong server, false passes/failures, debugging confusion
---
### Problem 3: Context Bloat in Subagent Prompts
**What happened:**
- Standard approach: give subagent full plan file to read
- Experiment: give only task + pattern + file + verify command
- Result: Faster, more focused, single-attempt completion more common
**Root cause:**
Subagents waste tokens and attention on irrelevant plan sections.
**Impact:** Medium - Slower execution, more failed attempts
**What worked:**
```
You are adding a single E2E test to packnplay's test suite.
**Your task:** Add `TestE2E_FeaturePrivilegedMode` to `pkg/runner/e2e_test.go`
**What to test:** A local devcontainer feature that requests `"privileged": true`
in its metadata should result in the container running with `--privileged` flag.
**Follow the exact pattern of TestE2E_FeatureOptionValidation** (at the end of the file)
**After writing, run:** `go test -v ./pkg/runner -run TestE2E_FeaturePrivilegedMode -timeout 5m`
```
---
### Problem 4: No Self-Reflection Before Handoff
**What happened:**
- Added self-reflection prompt: "Look at your work with fresh eyes - what could be better?"
- Implementer for Task 5 identified failing test was due to implementation bug, not test bug
- Traced to line 99: `strings.Join(metadata.Entrypoint, " ")` creating invalid Docker syntax
- Without self-reflection, would have just reported "test fails" without root cause
**Root cause:**
Implementers don't naturally step back and critique their own work before reporting completion.
**Impact:** Medium - Bugs handed off to reviewer that implementer could have caught
---
### Problem 5: Mock-Interface Drift
**What happened:**
```typescript
// Interface defines close()
interface PlatformAdapter {
close(): Promise<void>;
}
// Code (BUGGY) calls cleanup()
await adapter.cleanup();
// Mock (MATCHES BUG) defines cleanup()
vi.mock('web-adapter', () => ({
WebAdapter: vi.fn().mockImplementation(() => ({
cleanup: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined), // Wrong!
})),
}));
```
- Tests passed
- Runtime crashed: "adapter.cleanup is not a function"
**Root cause:**
Mock derived from what buggy code calls, not from interface definition. TypeScript can't catch inline mocks with wrong method names.
**Impact:** High - Tests give false confidence, runtime crashes
**Why testing-anti-patterns didn't prevent this:**
The skill covers testing mock behavior and mocking without understanding, but not the specific pattern of "derive mock from interface, not implementation."
---
### Problem 6: Code Reviewer File Access
**What happened:**
- Code reviewer subagent dispatched
- Couldn't find test file: "The file doesn't appear to exist in the repository"
- File actually exists
- Reviewer didn't know to explicitly read it first
**Root cause:**
Reviewer prompts don't include explicit file reading instructions.
**Impact:** Low-Medium - Reviews fail or incomplete
---
### Problem 7: Fix Workflow Latency
**What happened:**
- Implementer identifies bug during self-reflection
- Implementer knows the fix
- Current workflow: report → I dispatch fixer → fixer fixes → I verify
- Extra round-trip adds latency without adding value
**Root cause:**
Rigid separation between implementer and fixer roles when implementer has already diagnosed.
**Impact:** Low - Latency, but no correctness issue
---
### Problem 8: Skills Not Being Read
**What happened:**
- `testing-anti-patterns` skill exists
- Neither human nor subagents read it before writing tests
- Would have prevented some issues (though not all - see Problem 5)
**Root cause:**
No enforcement that subagents read relevant skills. No prompt includes skill reading.
**Impact:** Medium - Skill investment wasted if not used
---
## Proposed Improvements
### 1. verification-before-completion: Add Configuration Change Verification
**Add new section:**
```markdown
## Verifying Configuration Changes
When testing changes to configuration, providers, feature flags, or environment:
**Don't just verify the operation succeeded. Verify the output reflects the intended change.**
### Common Failure Pattern
Operation succeeds because *some* valid config exists, but it's not the config you intended to test.
### Examples
| Change | Insufficient | Required |
|--------|-------------|----------|
| Switch LLM provider | Status 200 | Response contains expected model name |
| Enable feature flag | No errors | Feature behavior actually active |
| Change environment | Deploy succeeds | Logs/vars reference new environment |
| Set credentials | Auth succeeds | Authenticated user/context is correct |
### Gate Function
```
BEFORE claiming configuration change works:
1. IDENTIFY: What should be DIFFERENT after this change?
2. LOCATE: Where is that difference observable?
- Response field (model name, user ID)
- Log line (environment, provider)
- Behavior (feature active/inactive)
3. RUN: Command that shows the observable difference
4. VERIFY: Output contains expected difference
5. ONLY THEN: Claim configuration change works
Red flags:
- "Request succeeded" without checking content
- Checking status code but not response body
- Verifying no errors but not positive confirmation
```
**Why this works:**
Forces verification of INTENT, not just operation success.
---
### 2. subagent-driven-development: Add Process Hygiene for E2E Tests
**Add new section:**
```markdown
## Process Hygiene for E2E Tests
When dispatching subagents that start services (servers, databases, message queues):
### Problem
Subagents are stateless - they don't know about processes started by previous subagents. Background processes persist and can interfere with later tests.
### Solution
**Before dispatching E2E test subagent, include cleanup in prompt:**
```
BEFORE starting any services:
1. Kill existing processes: pkill -f "<service-pattern>" 2>/dev/null || true
2. Wait for cleanup: sleep 1
3. Verify port free: lsof -i :<port> && echo "ERROR: Port still in use" || echo "Port free"
AFTER tests complete:
1. Kill the process you started
2. Verify cleanup: pgrep -f "<service-pattern>" || echo "Cleanup successful"
```
### Example
```
Task: Run E2E test of API server
Prompt includes:
"Before starting the server:
- Kill any existing servers: pkill -f 'node.*server.js' 2>/dev/null || true
- Verify port 3001 is free: lsof -i :3001 && exit 1 || echo 'Port available'
After tests:
- Kill the server you started
- Verify: pgrep -f 'node.*server.js' || echo 'Cleanup verified'"
```
### Why This Matters
- Stale processes serve requests with wrong config
- Port conflicts cause silent failures
- Process accumulation slows system
- Confusing test results (hitting wrong server)
```
**Trade-off analysis:**
- Adds boilerplate to prompts
- But prevents very confusing debugging
- Worth it for E2E test subagents
---
### 3. subagent-driven-development: Add Lean Context Option
**Modify Step 2: Execute Task with Subagent**
**Before:**
```
Read that task carefully from [plan-file].
```
**After:**
```
## Context Approaches
**Full Plan (default):**
Use when tasks are complex or have dependencies:
```
Read Task N from [plan-file] carefully.
```
**Lean Context (for independent tasks):**
Use when task is standalone and pattern-based:
```
You are implementing: [1-2 sentence task description]
File to modify: [exact path]
Pattern to follow: [reference to existing function/test]
What to implement: [specific requirement]
Verification: [exact command to run]
[Do NOT include full plan file]
```
**Use lean context when:**
- Task follows existing pattern (add similar test, implement similar feature)
- Task is self-contained (doesn't need context from other tasks)
- Pattern reference is sufficient (e.g., "follow TestE2E_FeatureOptionValidation")
**Use full plan when:**
- Task has dependencies on other tasks
- Requires understanding of overall architecture
- Complex logic that needs context
```
**Example:**
```
Lean context prompt:
"You are adding a test for privileged mode in devcontainer features.
File: pkg/runner/e2e_test.go
Pattern: Follow TestE2E_FeatureOptionValidation (at end of file)
Test: Feature with `"privileged": true` in metadata results in `--privileged` flag
Verify: go test -v ./pkg/runner -run TestE2E_FeaturePrivilegedMode -timeout 5m
Report: Implementation, test results, any issues."
```
**Why this works:**
Reduces token usage, increases focus, faster completion when appropriate.
---
### 4. subagent-driven-development: Add Self-Reflection Step
**Modify Step 2: Execute Task with Subagent**
**Add to prompt template:**
```
When done, BEFORE reporting back:
Take a step back and review your work with fresh eyes.
Ask yourself:
- Does this actually solve the task as specified?
- Are there edge cases I didn't consider?
- Did I follow the pattern correctly?
- If tests are failing, what's the ROOT CAUSE (implementation bug vs test bug)?
- What could be better about this implementation?
If you identify issues during this reflection, fix them now.
Then report:
- What you implemented
- Self-reflection findings (if any)
- Test results
- Files changed
```
**Why this works:**
Catches bugs implementer can find themselves before handoff. Documented case: identified entrypoint bug through self-reflection.
**Trade-off:**
Adds ~30 seconds per task, but catches issues before review.
---
### 5. requesting-code-review: Add Explicit File Reading
**Modify the code-reviewer template:**
**Add at the beginning:**
```markdown
## Files to Review
BEFORE analyzing, read these files:
1. [List specific files that changed in the diff]
2. [Files referenced by changes but not modified]
Use Read tool to load each file.
If you cannot find a file:
- Check exact path from diff
- Try alternate locations
- Report: "Cannot locate [path] - please verify file exists"
DO NOT proceed with review until you've read the actual code.
```
**Why this works:**
Explicit instruction prevents "file not found" issues.
---
### 6. testing-anti-patterns: Add Mock-Interface Drift Anti-Pattern
**Add new Anti-Pattern 6:**
```markdown
## Anti-Pattern 6: Mocks Derived from Implementation
**The violation:**
```typescript
// Code (BUGGY) calls cleanup()
await adapter.cleanup();
// Mock (MATCHES BUG) has cleanup()
const mock = {
cleanup: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined)
};
// Interface (CORRECT) defines close()
interface PlatformAdapter {
close(): Promise<void>;
}
```
**Why this is wrong:**
- Mock encodes the bug into the test
- TypeScript can't catch inline mocks with wrong method names
- Test passes because both code and mock are wrong
- Runtime crashes when real object is used
**The fix:**
```typescript
// ✅ GOOD: Derive mock from interface
// Step 1: Open interface definition (PlatformAdapter)
// Step 2: List methods defined there (close, initialize, etc.)
// Step 3: Mock EXACTLY those methods
const mock = {
initialize: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined),
close: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined), // From interface!
};
// Now test FAILS because code calls cleanup() which doesn't exist
// That failure reveals the bug BEFORE runtime
```
### Gate Function
```
BEFORE writing any mock:
1. STOP - Do NOT look at the code under test yet
2. FIND: The interface/type definition for the dependency
3. READ: The interface file
4. LIST: Methods defined in the interface
5. MOCK: ONLY those methods with EXACTLY those names
6. DO NOT: Look at what your code calls
IF your test fails because code calls something not in mock:
✅ GOOD - The test found a bug in your code
Fix the code to call the correct interface method
NOT the mock
Red flags:
- "I'll mock what the code calls"
- Copying method names from implementation
- Mock written without reading interface
- "The test is failing so I'll add this method to the mock"
```
**Detection:**
When you see runtime error "X is not a function" and tests pass:
1. Check if X is mocked
2. Compare mock methods to interface methods
3. Look for method name mismatches
```
**Why this works:**
Directly addresses the failure pattern from feedback.
---
### 7. subagent-driven-development: Require Skills Reading for Test Subagents
**Add to prompt template when task involves testing:**
```markdown
BEFORE writing any tests:
1. Read testing-anti-patterns skill:
Use Skill tool: superpowers:testing-anti-patterns
2. Apply gate functions from that skill when:
- Writing mocks
- Adding methods to production classes
- Mocking dependencies
This is NOT optional. Tests that violate anti-patterns will be rejected in review.
```
**Why this works:**
Ensures skills are actually used, not just exist.
**Trade-off:**
Adds time to each task, but prevents entire classes of bugs.
---
### 8. subagent-driven-development: Allow Implementer to Fix Self-Identified Issues
**Modify Step 2:**
**Current:**
```
Subagent reports back with summary of work.
```
**Proposed:**
```
Subagent performs self-reflection, then:
IF self-reflection identifies fixable issues:
1. Fix the issues
2. Re-run verification
3. Report: "Initial implementation + self-reflection fix"
ELSE:
Report: "Implementation complete"
Include in report:
- Self-reflection findings
- Whether fixes were applied
- Final verification results
```
**Why this works:**
Reduces latency when implementer already knows the fix. Documented case: would have saved one round-trip for entrypoint bug.
**Trade-off:**
Slightly more complex prompt, but faster end-to-end.
---
## Implementation Plan
### Phase 1: High-Impact, Low-Risk (Do First)
1. **verification-before-completion: Configuration change verification**
- Clear addition, doesn't change existing content
- Addresses high-impact problem (false confidence in tests)
- File: `skills/verification-before-completion/SKILL.md`
2. **testing-anti-patterns: Mock-interface drift**
- Adds new anti-pattern, doesn't modify existing
- Addresses high-impact problem (runtime crashes)
- File: `skills/testing-anti-patterns/SKILL.md`
3. **requesting-code-review: Explicit file reading**
- Simple addition to template
- Fixes concrete problem (reviewers can't find files)
- File: `skills/requesting-code-review/SKILL.md`
### Phase 2: Moderate Changes (Test Carefully)
4. **subagent-driven-development: Process hygiene**
- Adds new section, doesn't change workflow
- Addresses medium-high impact (test reliability)
- File: `skills/subagent-driven-development/SKILL.md`
5. **subagent-driven-development: Self-reflection**
- Changes prompt template (higher risk)
- But documented to catch bugs
- File: `skills/subagent-driven-development/SKILL.md`
6. **subagent-driven-development: Skills reading requirement**
- Adds prompt overhead
- But ensures skills are actually used
- File: `skills/subagent-driven-development/SKILL.md`
### Phase 3: Optimization (Validate First)
7. **subagent-driven-development: Lean context option**
- Adds complexity (two approaches)
- Needs validation that it doesn't cause confusion
- File: `skills/subagent-driven-development/SKILL.md`
8. **subagent-driven-development: Allow implementer to fix**
- Changes workflow (higher risk)
- Optimization, not bug fix
- File: `skills/subagent-driven-development/SKILL.md`
---
## Open Questions
1. **Lean context approach:**
- Should we make it the default for pattern-based tasks?
- How do we decide which approach to use?
- Risk of being too lean and missing important context?
2. **Self-reflection:**
- Will this slow down simple tasks significantly?
- Should it only apply to complex tasks?
- How do we prevent "reflection fatigue" where it becomes rote?
3. **Process hygiene:**
- Should this be in subagent-driven-development or a separate skill?
- Does it apply to other workflows beyond E2E tests?
- How do we handle cases where process SHOULD persist (dev servers)?
4. **Skills reading enforcement:**
- Should we require ALL subagents to read relevant skills?
- How do we keep prompts from becoming too long?
- Risk of over-documenting and losing focus?
---
## Success Metrics
How do we know these improvements work?
1. **Configuration verification:**
- Zero instances of "test passed but wrong config was used"
- Jesse doesn't say "that's not actually testing what you think"
2. **Process hygiene:**
- Zero instances of "test hit wrong server"
- No port conflict errors during E2E test runs
3. **Mock-interface drift:**
- Zero instances of "tests pass but runtime crashes on missing method"
- No method name mismatches between mocks and interfaces
4. **Self-reflection:**
- Measurable: Do implementer reports include self-reflection findings?
- Qualitative: Do fewer bugs make it to code review?
5. **Skills reading:**
- Subagent reports reference skill gate functions
- Fewer anti-pattern violations in code review
---
## Risks and Mitigations
### Risk: Prompt Bloat
**Problem:** Adding all these requirements makes prompts overwhelming
**Mitigation:**
- Phase implementation (don't add everything at once)
- Make some additions conditional (E2E hygiene only for E2E tests)
- Consider templates for different task types
### Risk: Analysis Paralysis
**Problem:** Too much reflection/verification slows execution
**Mitigation:**
- Keep gate functions quick (seconds, not minutes)
- Make lean context opt-in initially
- Monitor task completion times
### Risk: False Sense of Security
**Problem:** Following checklist doesn't guarantee correctness
**Mitigation:**
- Emphasize gate functions are minimums, not maximums
- Keep "use judgment" language in skills
- Document that skills catch common failures, not all failures
### Risk: Skill Divergence
**Problem:** Different skills give conflicting advice
**Mitigation:**
- Review changes across all skills for consistency
- Document how skills interact (Integration sections)
- Test with real scenarios before deployment
---
## Recommendation
**Proceed with Phase 1 immediately:**
- verification-before-completion: Configuration change verification
- testing-anti-patterns: Mock-interface drift
- requesting-code-review: Explicit file reading
**Test Phase 2 with Jesse before finalizing:**
- Get feedback on self-reflection impact
- Validate process hygiene approach
- Confirm skills reading requirement is worth overhead
**Hold Phase 3 pending validation:**
- Lean context needs real-world testing
- Implementer-fix workflow change needs careful evaluation
These changes address real problems documented by users while minimizing risk of making skills worse.

303
docs/testing.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,303 @@
# Testing Superpowers Skills
This document describes how to test Superpowers skills, particularly the integration tests for complex skills like `subagent-driven-development`.
## Overview
Testing skills that involve subagents, workflows, and complex interactions requires running actual Claude Code sessions in headless mode and verifying their behavior through session transcripts.
## Test Structure
```
tests/
├── claude-code/
│ ├── test-helpers.sh # Shared test utilities
│ ├── test-subagent-driven-development-integration.sh
│ ├── analyze-token-usage.py # Token analysis tool
│ └── run-skill-tests.sh # Test runner (if exists)
```
## Running Tests
### Integration Tests
Integration tests execute real Claude Code sessions with actual skills:
```bash
# Run the subagent-driven-development integration test
cd tests/claude-code
./test-subagent-driven-development-integration.sh
```
**Note:** Integration tests can take 10-30 minutes as they execute real implementation plans with multiple subagents.
### Requirements
- Must run from the **superpowers plugin directory** (not from temp directories)
- Claude Code must be installed and available as `claude` command
- Local dev marketplace must be enabled: `"superpowers@superpowers-dev": true` in `~/.claude/settings.json`
## Integration Test: subagent-driven-development
### What It Tests
The integration test verifies the `subagent-driven-development` skill correctly:
1. **Plan Loading**: Reads the plan once at the beginning
2. **Full Task Text**: Provides complete task descriptions to subagents (doesn't make them read files)
3. **Self-Review**: Ensures subagents perform self-review before reporting
4. **Review Order**: Runs spec compliance review before code quality review
5. **Review Loops**: Uses review loops when issues are found
6. **Independent Verification**: Spec reviewer reads code independently, doesn't trust implementer reports
### How It Works
1. **Setup**: Creates a temporary Node.js project with a minimal implementation plan
2. **Execution**: Runs Claude Code in headless mode with the skill
3. **Verification**: Parses the session transcript (`.jsonl` file) to verify:
- Skill tool was invoked
- Subagents were dispatched (Task tool)
- TodoWrite was used for tracking
- Implementation files were created
- Tests pass
- Git commits show proper workflow
4. **Token Analysis**: Shows token usage breakdown by subagent
### Test Output
```
========================================
Integration Test: subagent-driven-development
========================================
Test project: /tmp/tmp.xyz123
=== Verification Tests ===
Test 1: Skill tool invoked...
[PASS] subagent-driven-development skill was invoked
Test 2: Subagents dispatched...
[PASS] 7 subagents dispatched
Test 3: Task tracking...
[PASS] TodoWrite used 5 time(s)
Test 6: Implementation verification...
[PASS] src/math.js created
[PASS] add function exists
[PASS] multiply function exists
[PASS] test/math.test.js created
[PASS] Tests pass
Test 7: Git commit history...
[PASS] Multiple commits created (3 total)
Test 8: No extra features added...
[PASS] No extra features added
=========================================
Token Usage Analysis
=========================================
Usage Breakdown:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agent Description Msgs Input Output Cache Cost
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
main Main session (coordinator) 34 27 3,996 1,213,703 $ 4.09
3380c209 implementing Task 1: Create Add Function 1 2 787 24,989 $ 0.09
34b00fde implementing Task 2: Create Multiply Function 1 4 644 25,114 $ 0.09
3801a732 reviewing whether an implementation matches... 1 5 703 25,742 $ 0.09
4c142934 doing a final code review... 1 6 854 25,319 $ 0.09
5f017a42 a code reviewer. Review Task 2... 1 6 504 22,949 $ 0.08
a6b7fbe4 a code reviewer. Review Task 1... 1 6 515 22,534 $ 0.08
f15837c0 reviewing whether an implementation matches... 1 6 416 22,485 $ 0.07
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS:
Total messages: 41
Input tokens: 62
Output tokens: 8,419
Cache creation tokens: 132,742
Cache read tokens: 1,382,835
Total input (incl cache): 1,515,639
Total tokens: 1,524,058
Estimated cost: $4.67
(at $3/$15 per M tokens for input/output)
========================================
Test Summary
========================================
STATUS: PASSED
```
## Token Analysis Tool
### Usage
Analyze token usage from any Claude Code session:
```bash
python3 tests/claude-code/analyze-token-usage.py ~/.claude/projects/<project-dir>/<session-id>.jsonl
```
### Finding Session Files
Session transcripts are stored in `~/.claude/projects/` with the working directory path encoded:
```bash
# Example for /Users/jesse/Documents/GitHub/superpowers/superpowers
SESSION_DIR="$HOME/.claude/projects/-Users-jesse-Documents-GitHub-superpowers-superpowers"
# Find recent sessions
ls -lt "$SESSION_DIR"/*.jsonl | head -5
```
### What It Shows
- **Main session usage**: Token usage by the coordinator (you or main Claude instance)
- **Per-subagent breakdown**: Each Task invocation with:
- Agent ID
- Description (extracted from prompt)
- Message count
- Input/output tokens
- Cache usage
- Estimated cost
- **Totals**: Overall token usage and cost estimate
### Understanding the Output
- **High cache reads**: Good - means prompt caching is working
- **High input tokens on main**: Expected - coordinator has full context
- **Similar costs per subagent**: Expected - each gets similar task complexity
- **Cost per task**: Typical range is $0.05-$0.15 per subagent depending on task
## Troubleshooting
### Skills Not Loading
**Problem**: Skill not found when running headless tests
**Solutions**:
1. Ensure you're running FROM the superpowers directory: `cd /path/to/superpowers && tests/...`
2. Check `~/.claude/settings.json` has `"superpowers@superpowers-dev": true` in `enabledPlugins`
3. Verify skill exists in `skills/` directory
### Permission Errors
**Problem**: Claude blocked from writing files or accessing directories
**Solutions**:
1. Use `--permission-mode bypassPermissions` flag
2. Use `--add-dir /path/to/temp/dir` to grant access to test directories
3. Check file permissions on test directories
### Test Timeouts
**Problem**: Test takes too long and times out
**Solutions**:
1. Increase timeout: `timeout 1800 claude ...` (30 minutes)
2. Check for infinite loops in skill logic
3. Review subagent task complexity
### Session File Not Found
**Problem**: Can't find session transcript after test run
**Solutions**:
1. Check the correct project directory in `~/.claude/projects/`
2. Use `find ~/.claude/projects -name "*.jsonl" -mmin -60` to find recent sessions
3. Verify test actually ran (check for errors in test output)
## Writing New Integration Tests
### Template
```bash
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
source "$SCRIPT_DIR/test-helpers.sh"
# Create test project
TEST_PROJECT=$(create_test_project)
trap "cleanup_test_project $TEST_PROJECT" EXIT
# Set up test files...
cd "$TEST_PROJECT"
# Run Claude with skill
PROMPT="Your test prompt here"
cd "$SCRIPT_DIR/../.." && timeout 1800 claude -p "$PROMPT" \
--allowed-tools=all \
--add-dir "$TEST_PROJECT" \
--permission-mode bypassPermissions \
2>&1 | tee output.txt
# Find and analyze session
WORKING_DIR_ESCAPED=$(echo "$SCRIPT_DIR/../.." | sed 's/\\//-/g' | sed 's/^-//')
SESSION_DIR="$HOME/.claude/projects/$WORKING_DIR_ESCAPED"
SESSION_FILE=$(find "$SESSION_DIR" -name "*.jsonl" -type f -mmin -60 | sort -r | head -1)
# Verify behavior by parsing session transcript
if grep -q '"name":"Skill".*"skill":"your-skill-name"' "$SESSION_FILE"; then
echo "[PASS] Skill was invoked"
fi
# Show token analysis
python3 "$SCRIPT_DIR/analyze-token-usage.py" "$SESSION_FILE"
```
### Best Practices
1. **Always cleanup**: Use trap to cleanup temp directories
2. **Parse transcripts**: Don't grep user-facing output - parse the `.jsonl` session file
3. **Grant permissions**: Use `--permission-mode bypassPermissions` and `--add-dir`
4. **Run from plugin dir**: Skills only load when running from the superpowers directory
5. **Show token usage**: Always include token analysis for cost visibility
6. **Test real behavior**: Verify actual files created, tests passing, commits made
## Session Transcript Format
Session transcripts are JSONL (JSON Lines) files where each line is a JSON object representing a message or tool result.
### Key Fields
```json
{
"type": "assistant",
"message": {
"content": [...],
"usage": {
"input_tokens": 27,
"output_tokens": 3996,
"cache_read_input_tokens": 1213703
}
}
}
```
### Tool Results
```json
{
"type": "user",
"toolUseResult": {
"agentId": "3380c209",
"usage": {
"input_tokens": 2,
"output_tokens": 787,
"cache_read_input_tokens": 24989
},
"prompt": "You are implementing Task 1...",
"content": [{"type": "text", "text": "..."}]
}
}
```
The `agentId` field links to subagent sessions, and the `usage` field contains token usage for that specific subagent invocation.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
# Cross-Platform Polyglot Hooks for Claude Code
Claude Code plugins need hooks that work on Windows, macOS, and Linux. This document explains the polyglot wrapper technique that makes this possible.
## The Problem
Claude Code runs hook commands through the system's default shell:
- **Windows**: CMD.exe
- **macOS/Linux**: bash or sh
This creates several challenges:
1. **Script execution**: Windows CMD can't execute `.sh` files directly - it tries to open them in a text editor
2. **Path format**: Windows uses backslashes (`C:\path`), Unix uses forward slashes (`/path`)
3. **Environment variables**: `$VAR` syntax doesn't work in CMD
4. **No `bash` in PATH**: Even with Git Bash installed, `bash` isn't in the PATH when CMD runs
## The Solution: Polyglot `.cmd` Wrapper
A polyglot script is valid syntax in multiple languages simultaneously. Our wrapper is valid in both CMD and bash:
```cmd
: << 'CMDBLOCK'
@echo off
"C:\Program Files\Git\bin\bash.exe" -l -c "\"$(cygpath -u \"$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT\")/hooks/session-start.sh\""
exit /b
CMDBLOCK
# Unix shell runs from here
"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/session-start.sh"
```
### How It Works
#### On Windows (CMD.exe)
1. `: << 'CMDBLOCK'` - CMD sees `:` as a label (like `:label`) and ignores `<< 'CMDBLOCK'`
2. `@echo off` - Suppresses command echoing
3. The bash.exe command runs with:
- `-l` (login shell) to get proper PATH with Unix utilities
- `cygpath -u` converts Windows path to Unix format (`C:\foo``/c/foo`)
4. `exit /b` - Exits the batch script, stopping CMD here
5. Everything after `CMDBLOCK` is never reached by CMD
#### On Unix (bash/sh)
1. `: << 'CMDBLOCK'` - `:` is a no-op, `<< 'CMDBLOCK'` starts a heredoc
2. Everything until `CMDBLOCK` is consumed by the heredoc (ignored)
3. `# Unix shell runs from here` - Comment
4. The script runs directly with the Unix path
## File Structure
```
hooks/
├── hooks.json # Points to the .cmd wrapper
├── session-start.cmd # Polyglot wrapper (cross-platform entry point)
└── session-start.sh # Actual hook logic (bash script)
```
### hooks.json
```json
{
"hooks": {
"SessionStart": [
{
"matcher": "startup|resume|clear|compact",
"hooks": [
{
"type": "command",
"command": "\"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/session-start.cmd\""
}
]
}
]
}
}
```
Note: The path must be quoted because `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}` may contain spaces on Windows (e.g., `C:\Program Files\...`).
## Requirements
### Windows
- **Git for Windows** must be installed (provides `bash.exe` and `cygpath`)
- Default installation path: `C:\Program Files\Git\bin\bash.exe`
- If Git is installed elsewhere, the wrapper needs modification
### Unix (macOS/Linux)
- Standard bash or sh shell
- The `.cmd` file must have execute permission (`chmod +x`)
## Writing Cross-Platform Hook Scripts
Your actual hook logic goes in the `.sh` file. To ensure it works on Windows (via Git Bash):
### Do:
- Use pure bash builtins when possible
- Use `$(command)` instead of backticks
- Quote all variable expansions: `"$VAR"`
- Use `printf` or here-docs for output
### Avoid:
- External commands that may not be in PATH (sed, awk, grep)
- If you must use them, they're available in Git Bash but ensure PATH is set up (use `bash -l`)
### Example: JSON Escaping Without sed/awk
Instead of:
```bash
escaped=$(echo "$content" | sed 's/\\/\\\\/g' | sed 's/"/\\"/g' | awk '{printf "%s\\n", $0}')
```
Use pure bash:
```bash
escape_for_json() {
local input="$1"
local output=""
local i char
for (( i=0; i<${#input}; i++ )); do
char="${input:$i:1}"
case "$char" in
$'\\') output+='\\' ;;
'"') output+='\"' ;;
$'\n') output+='\n' ;;
$'\r') output+='\r' ;;
$'\t') output+='\t' ;;
*) output+="$char" ;;
esac
done
printf '%s' "$output"
}
```
## Reusable Wrapper Pattern
For plugins with multiple hooks, you can create a generic wrapper that takes the script name as an argument:
### run-hook.cmd
```cmd
: << 'CMDBLOCK'
@echo off
set "SCRIPT_DIR=%~dp0"
set "SCRIPT_NAME=%~1"
"C:\Program Files\Git\bin\bash.exe" -l -c "cd \"$(cygpath -u \"%SCRIPT_DIR%\")\" && \"./%SCRIPT_NAME%\""
exit /b
CMDBLOCK
# Unix shell runs from here
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]:-$0}")" && pwd)"
SCRIPT_NAME="$1"
shift
"${SCRIPT_DIR}/${SCRIPT_NAME}" "$@"
```
### hooks.json using the reusable wrapper
```json
{
"hooks": {
"SessionStart": [
{
"matcher": "startup",
"hooks": [
{
"type": "command",
"command": "\"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/run-hook.cmd\" session-start.sh"
}
]
}
],
"PreToolUse": [
{
"matcher": "Bash",
"hooks": [
{
"type": "command",
"command": "\"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/run-hook.cmd\" validate-bash.sh"
}
]
}
]
}
}
```
## Troubleshooting
### "bash is not recognized"
CMD can't find bash. The wrapper uses the full path `C:\Program Files\Git\bin\bash.exe`. If Git is installed elsewhere, update the path.
### "cygpath: command not found" or "dirname: command not found"
Bash isn't running as a login shell. Ensure `-l` flag is used.
### Path has weird `\/` in it
`${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}` expanded to a Windows path ending with backslash, then `/hooks/...` was appended. Use `cygpath` to convert the entire path.
### Script opens in text editor instead of running
The hooks.json is pointing directly to the `.sh` file. Point to the `.cmd` wrapper instead.
### Works in terminal but not as hook
Claude Code may run hooks differently. Test by simulating the hook environment:
```powershell
$env:CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT = "C:\path\to\plugin"
cmd /c "C:\path\to\plugin\hooks\session-start.cmd"
```
## Related Issues
- [anthropics/claude-code#9758](https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/9758) - .sh scripts open in editor on Windows
- [anthropics/claude-code#3417](https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/3417) - Hooks don't work on Windows
- [anthropics/claude-code#6023](https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/6023) - CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR not found

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
"hooks": [
{
"type": "command",
"command": "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/session-start.sh"
"command": "\"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/run-hook.cmd\" session-start.sh"
}
]
}

19
hooks/run-hook.cmd Executable file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
: << 'CMDBLOCK'
@echo off
REM Polyglot wrapper: runs .sh scripts cross-platform
REM Usage: run-hook.cmd <script-name> [args...]
REM The script should be in the same directory as this wrapper
if "%~1"=="" (
echo run-hook.cmd: missing script name >&2
exit /b 1
)
"C:\Program Files\Git\bin\bash.exe" -l "%~dp0%~1" %2 %3 %4 %5 %6 %7 %8 %9
exit /b
CMDBLOCK
# Unix shell runs from here
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
SCRIPT_NAME="$1"
shift
"${SCRIPT_DIR}/${SCRIPT_NAME}" "$@"

View File

@@ -17,16 +17,34 @@ fi
# Read using-superpowers content
using_superpowers_content=$(cat "${PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/using-superpowers/SKILL.md" 2>&1 || echo "Error reading using-superpowers skill")
# Escape outputs for JSON
using_superpowers_escaped=$(echo "$using_superpowers_content" | sed 's/\\/\\\\/g' | sed 's/"/\\"/g' | awk '{printf "%s\\n", $0}')
warning_escaped=$(echo "$warning_message" | sed 's/\\/\\\\/g' | sed 's/"/\\"/g' | awk '{printf "%s\\n", $0}')
# Escape outputs for JSON using pure bash
escape_for_json() {
local input="$1"
local output=""
local i char
for (( i=0; i<${#input}; i++ )); do
char="${input:$i:1}"
case "$char" in
$'\\') output+='\\' ;;
'"') output+='\"' ;;
$'\n') output+='\n' ;;
$'\r') output+='\r' ;;
$'\t') output+='\t' ;;
*) output+="$char" ;;
esac
done
printf '%s' "$output"
}
using_superpowers_escaped=$(escape_for_json "$using_superpowers_content")
warning_escaped=$(escape_for_json "$warning_message")
# Output context injection as JSON
cat <<EOF
{
"hookSpecificOutput": {
"hookEventName": "SessionStart",
"additionalContext": "<EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>\nYou have superpowers.\n\n**The content below is from skills/using-superpowers/SKILL.md - your introduction to using skills:**\n\n${using_superpowers_escaped}\n\n${warning_escaped}\n</EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>"
"additionalContext": "<EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>\nYou have superpowers.\n\n**Below is the full content of your 'superpowers:using-superpowers' skill - your introduction to using skills. For all other skills, use the 'Skill' tool:**\n\n${using_superpowers_escaped}\n\n${warning_escaped}\n</EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>"
}
}
EOF

View File

@@ -1,88 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail
SKILLS_DIR="${HOME}/.config/superpowers/skills"
SKILLS_REPO="https://github.com/obra/superpowers-skills.git"
# Check if skills directory exists and is a valid git repo
if [ -d "$SKILLS_DIR/.git" ]; then
cd "$SKILLS_DIR"
# Get the remote name for the current tracking branch
TRACKING_REMOTE=$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref --symbolic-full-name @{u} 2>/dev/null | cut -d'/' -f1 || echo "")
# Fetch from tracking remote if set, otherwise try upstream then origin
if [ -n "$TRACKING_REMOTE" ]; then
git fetch "$TRACKING_REMOTE" 2>/dev/null || true
else
git fetch upstream 2>/dev/null || git fetch origin 2>/dev/null || true
fi
# Check if we can fast-forward
LOCAL=$(git rev-parse @ 2>/dev/null || echo "")
REMOTE=$(git rev-parse @{u} 2>/dev/null || echo "")
BASE=$(git merge-base @ @{u} 2>/dev/null || echo "")
# Try to fast-forward merge first
if [ -n "$LOCAL" ] && [ -n "$REMOTE" ] && [ "$LOCAL" != "$REMOTE" ]; then
# Check if we can fast-forward (local is ancestor of remote)
if [ "$LOCAL" = "$BASE" ]; then
# Fast-forward merge is possible - local is behind
echo "Updating skills to latest version..."
if git merge --ff-only @{u} 2>&1; then
echo "✓ Skills updated successfully"
echo "SKILLS_UPDATED=true"
else
echo "Failed to update skills"
fi
elif [ "$REMOTE" != "$BASE" ]; then
# Remote has changes (local is behind or diverged)
echo "SKILLS_BEHIND=true"
fi
# If REMOTE = BASE, local is ahead - no action needed
fi
exit 0
fi
# Skills directory doesn't exist or isn't a git repo - initialize it
echo "Initializing skills repository..."
# Handle migration from old installation
if [ -d "${HOME}/.config/superpowers/.git" ]; then
echo "Found existing installation. Backing up..."
mv "${HOME}/.config/superpowers/.git" "${HOME}/.config/superpowers/.git.bak"
if [ -d "${HOME}/.config/superpowers/skills" ]; then
mv "${HOME}/.config/superpowers/skills" "${HOME}/.config/superpowers/skills.bak"
echo "Your old skills are in ~/.config/superpowers/skills.bak"
fi
fi
# Clone the skills repository
mkdir -p "${HOME}/.config/superpowers"
git clone "$SKILLS_REPO" "$SKILLS_DIR"
cd "$SKILLS_DIR"
# Offer to fork if gh is installed
if command -v gh &> /dev/null; then
echo ""
echo "GitHub CLI detected. Would you like to fork superpowers-skills?"
echo "Forking allows you to share skill improvements with the community."
echo ""
read -p "Fork superpowers-skills? (y/N): " -n 1 -r
echo
if [[ $REPLY =~ ^[Yy]$ ]]; then
gh repo fork obra/superpowers-skills --remote=true
echo "Forked! You can now contribute skills back to the community."
else
git remote add upstream "$SKILLS_REPO"
fi
else
# No gh, just set up upstream remote
git remote add upstream "$SKILLS_REPO"
fi
echo "Skills repository initialized at $SKILLS_DIR"

208
lib/skills-core.js Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
import fs from 'fs';
import path from 'path';
import { execSync } from 'child_process';
/**
* Extract YAML frontmatter from a skill file.
* Current format:
* ---
* name: skill-name
* description: Use when [condition] - [what it does]
* ---
*
* @param {string} filePath - Path to SKILL.md file
* @returns {{name: string, description: string}}
*/
function extractFrontmatter(filePath) {
try {
const content = fs.readFileSync(filePath, 'utf8');
const lines = content.split('\n');
let inFrontmatter = false;
let name = '';
let description = '';
for (const line of lines) {
if (line.trim() === '---') {
if (inFrontmatter) break;
inFrontmatter = true;
continue;
}
if (inFrontmatter) {
const match = line.match(/^(\w+):\s*(.*)$/);
if (match) {
const [, key, value] = match;
switch (key) {
case 'name':
name = value.trim();
break;
case 'description':
description = value.trim();
break;
}
}
}
}
return { name, description };
} catch (error) {
return { name: '', description: '' };
}
}
/**
* Find all SKILL.md files in a directory recursively.
*
* @param {string} dir - Directory to search
* @param {string} sourceType - 'personal' or 'superpowers' for namespacing
* @param {number} maxDepth - Maximum recursion depth (default: 3)
* @returns {Array<{path: string, name: string, description: string, sourceType: string}>}
*/
function findSkillsInDir(dir, sourceType, maxDepth = 3) {
const skills = [];
if (!fs.existsSync(dir)) return skills;
function recurse(currentDir, depth) {
if (depth > maxDepth) return;
const entries = fs.readdirSync(currentDir, { withFileTypes: true });
for (const entry of entries) {
const fullPath = path.join(currentDir, entry.name);
if (entry.isDirectory()) {
// Check for SKILL.md in this directory
const skillFile = path.join(fullPath, 'SKILL.md');
if (fs.existsSync(skillFile)) {
const { name, description } = extractFrontmatter(skillFile);
skills.push({
path: fullPath,
skillFile: skillFile,
name: name || entry.name,
description: description || '',
sourceType: sourceType
});
}
// Recurse into subdirectories
recurse(fullPath, depth + 1);
}
}
}
recurse(dir, 0);
return skills;
}
/**
* Resolve a skill name to its file path, handling shadowing
* (personal skills override superpowers skills).
*
* @param {string} skillName - Name like "superpowers:brainstorming" or "my-skill"
* @param {string} superpowersDir - Path to superpowers skills directory
* @param {string} personalDir - Path to personal skills directory
* @returns {{skillFile: string, sourceType: string, skillPath: string} | null}
*/
function resolveSkillPath(skillName, superpowersDir, personalDir) {
// Strip superpowers: prefix if present
const forceSuperpowers = skillName.startsWith('superpowers:');
const actualSkillName = forceSuperpowers ? skillName.replace(/^superpowers:/, '') : skillName;
// Try personal skills first (unless explicitly superpowers:)
if (!forceSuperpowers && personalDir) {
const personalPath = path.join(personalDir, actualSkillName);
const personalSkillFile = path.join(personalPath, 'SKILL.md');
if (fs.existsSync(personalSkillFile)) {
return {
skillFile: personalSkillFile,
sourceType: 'personal',
skillPath: actualSkillName
};
}
}
// Try superpowers skills
if (superpowersDir) {
const superpowersPath = path.join(superpowersDir, actualSkillName);
const superpowersSkillFile = path.join(superpowersPath, 'SKILL.md');
if (fs.existsSync(superpowersSkillFile)) {
return {
skillFile: superpowersSkillFile,
sourceType: 'superpowers',
skillPath: actualSkillName
};
}
}
return null;
}
/**
* Check if a git repository has updates available.
*
* @param {string} repoDir - Path to git repository
* @returns {boolean} - True if updates are available
*/
function checkForUpdates(repoDir) {
try {
// Quick check with 3 second timeout to avoid delays if network is down
const output = execSync('git fetch origin && git status --porcelain=v1 --branch', {
cwd: repoDir,
timeout: 3000,
encoding: 'utf8',
stdio: 'pipe'
});
// Parse git status output to see if we're behind
const statusLines = output.split('\n');
for (const line of statusLines) {
if (line.startsWith('## ') && line.includes('[behind ')) {
return true; // We're behind remote
}
}
return false; // Up to date
} catch (error) {
// Network down, git error, timeout, etc. - don't block bootstrap
return false;
}
}
/**
* Strip YAML frontmatter from skill content, returning just the content.
*
* @param {string} content - Full content including frontmatter
* @returns {string} - Content without frontmatter
*/
function stripFrontmatter(content) {
const lines = content.split('\n');
let inFrontmatter = false;
let frontmatterEnded = false;
const contentLines = [];
for (const line of lines) {
if (line.trim() === '---') {
if (inFrontmatter) {
frontmatterEnded = true;
continue;
}
inFrontmatter = true;
continue;
}
if (frontmatterEnded || !inFrontmatter) {
contentLines.push(line);
}
}
return contentLines.join('\n').trim();
}
export {
extractFrontmatter,
findSkillsInDir,
resolveSkillPath,
checkForUpdates,
stripFrontmatter
};

View File

@@ -1,175 +1,54 @@
---
name: brainstorming
description: Use when creating or developing anything, before writing code or implementation plans - refines rough ideas into fully-formed designs through structured Socratic questioning, alternative exploration, and incremental validation
description: "You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation."
---
# Brainstorming Ideas Into Designs
## Overview
Transform rough ideas into fully-formed designs through structured questioning and alternative exploration.
Help turn ideas into fully formed designs and specs through natural collaborative dialogue.
**Core principle:** Research first, ask targeted questions to fill gaps, explore alternatives, present design incrementally for validation.
**Announce at start:** "I'm using the brainstorming skill to refine your idea into a design."
## Quick Reference
| Phase | Key Activities | Tool Usage | Output |
|-------|---------------|------------|--------|
| **Prep: Autonomous Recon** | Inspect repo/docs/commits, form initial model | Native tools (ls, cat, git log, etc.) | Draft understanding to confirm |
| **1. Understanding** | Share findings, ask only for missing context | AskUserQuestion for real decisions | Purpose, constraints, criteria (confirmed) |
| **2. Exploration** | Propose 2-3 approaches | AskUserQuestion for approach selection | Architecture options with trade-offs |
| **3. Design Presentation** | Present in 200-300 word sections | Open-ended questions | Complete design with validation |
| **4. Design Documentation** | Write design document | writing-clearly-and-concisely skill | Design doc in docs/plans/ |
| **5. Worktree Setup** | Set up isolated workspace | using-git-worktrees skill | Ready development environment |
| **6. Planning Handoff** | Create implementation plan | writing-plans skill | Detailed task breakdown |
Start by understanding the current project context, then ask questions one at a time to refine the idea. Once you understand what you're building, present the design in small sections (200-300 words), checking after each section whether it looks right so far.
## The Process
Copy this checklist to track progress:
**Understanding the idea:**
- Check out the current project state first (files, docs, recent commits)
- Ask questions one at a time to refine the idea
- Prefer multiple choice questions when possible, but open-ended is fine too
- Only one question per message - if a topic needs more exploration, break it into multiple questions
- Focus on understanding: purpose, constraints, success criteria
```
Brainstorming Progress:
- [ ] Prep: Autonomous Recon (repo/docs/commits reviewed, initial model shared)
- [ ] Phase 1: Understanding (purpose, constraints, criteria gathered)
- [ ] Phase 2: Exploration (2-3 approaches proposed and evaluated)
- [ ] Phase 3: Design Presentation (design validated in sections)
- [ ] Phase 4: Design Documentation (design written to docs/plans/)
- [ ] Phase 5: Worktree Setup (if implementing)
- [ ] Phase 6: Planning Handoff (if implementing)
```
**Exploring approaches:**
- Propose 2-3 different approaches with trade-offs
- Present options conversationally with your recommendation and reasoning
- Lead with your recommended option and explain why
### Prep: Autonomous Recon
- Use existing tools (file browsing, docs, git history, tests) to understand current project state before asking anything.
- Form your draft model: what problem you're solving, what artifacts exist, and what questions remain.
- Start the conversation by sharing that model: "Based on exploring the project state, docs, working copy, and recent commits, here's how I think this should work…"
- Ask follow-up questions only for information you cannot infer from available materials.
**Presenting the design:**
- Once you believe you understand what you're building, present the design
- Break it into sections of 200-300 words
- Ask after each section whether it looks right so far
- Cover: architecture, components, data flow, error handling, testing
- Be ready to go back and clarify if something doesn't make sense
### Phase 1: Understanding
- Share your synthesized understanding first, then invite corrections or additions.
- Ask one focused question at a time, only for gaps you cannot close yourself.
- **Use AskUserQuestion tool** only when you need the human to make a decision among real alternatives.
- Gather: Purpose, constraints, success criteria (confirmed or amended by your partner)
## After the Design
**Example summary + targeted question:**
```
Based on the README and yesterday's commit, we're expanding localization to dashboard and billing emails; admin console is still untouched. Only gap I see is whether support responses need localization in this iteration. Did I miss anything important?
```
**Documentation:**
- Write the validated design to `docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md`
- Use elements-of-style:writing-clearly-and-concisely skill if available
- Commit the design document to git
### Phase 2: Exploration
- Propose 2-3 different approaches
- For each: Core architecture, trade-offs, complexity assessment, and your recommendation
- **Use AskUserQuestion tool** to present approaches when you truly need a judgement call
- Lead with the option you prefer and explain why; invite disagreement if your partner sees it differently
- Own prioritization: if the repo makes priorities clear, state them and proceed rather than asking
**Example using AskUserQuestion:**
```
Question: "Which architectural approach should we use?"
Options:
- "Direct API calls with retry logic" (simple, synchronous, easier to debug) ← recommended for current scope
- "Event-driven with message queue" (scalable, complex setup, eventual consistency)
- "Hybrid with background jobs" (balanced, moderate complexity, best of both)
I recommend the direct API approach because it matches existing patterns and minimizes new infrastructure. Let me know if you see a blocker that pushes us toward the other options.
```
### Phase 3: Design Presentation
- Present in coherent sections; use ~200-300 words when introducing new material, shorter summaries once alignment is obvious
- Cover: Architecture, components, data flow, error handling, testing
- Check in at natural breakpoints rather than after every paragraph: "Stop me if this diverges from what you expect."
- Use open-ended questions to allow freeform feedback
- Assume ownership and proceed unless your partner redirects you
### Phase 4: Design Documentation
After validating the design, write it to a permanent document:
- **File location:** `docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md` (use actual date and descriptive topic)
- **RECOMMENDED SUB-SKILL:** Use elements-of-style:writing-clearly-and-concisely (if available) for documentation quality
- **Content:** Capture the design as discussed and validated in Phase 3, organized into sections that emerged from the conversation
- Commit the design document to git before proceeding
### Phase 5: Worktree Setup (for implementation)
When design is approved and implementation will follow:
- Announce: "I'm using the using-git-worktrees skill to set up an isolated workspace."
- **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** Use superpowers:using-git-worktrees
- Follow that skill's process for directory selection, safety verification, and setup
- Return here when worktree ready
### Phase 6: Planning Handoff
Ask: "Ready to create the implementation plan?"
When your human partner confirms (any affirmative response):
- Announce: "I'm using the writing-plans skill to create the implementation plan."
- **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** Use superpowers:writing-plans
- Create detailed plan in the worktree
## Question Patterns
### When to Use AskUserQuestion Tool
**Use AskUserQuestion when:**
- You need your partner to make a judgement call among real alternatives
- You have a recommendation and can explain why its your preference
- Prioritization is ambiguous and cannot be inferred from existing materials
**Best practices:**
- State your preferred option and rationale inside the question so your partner can agree or redirect
- If you know the answer from repo/docs, state it as fact and proceed—no question needed
- When priorities are spelled out, acknowledge them and proceed rather than delegating the choice back to your partner
### When to Use Open-Ended Questions
**Use open-ended questions for:**
- Phase 3: Design validation ("Does this look right so far?")
- When you need detailed feedback or explanation
- When partner should describe their own requirements
- When structured options would limit creative input
Frame them to confirm or expand your current understanding rather than reopening settled topics.
**Example decision flow:**
- "What authentication method?" → Use AskUserQuestion (2-4 options)
- "Does this design handle your use case?" → Open-ended (validation)
## When to Revisit Earlier Phases
```dot
digraph revisit_phases {
rankdir=LR;
"New constraint revealed?" [shape=diamond];
"Partner questions approach?" [shape=diamond];
"Requirements unclear?" [shape=diamond];
"Return to Phase 1" [shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor="#ffcccc"];
"Return to Phase 2" [shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor="#ffffcc"];
"Continue forward" [shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor="#ccffcc"];
"New constraint revealed?" -> "Return to Phase 1" [label="yes"];
"New constraint revealed?" -> "Partner questions approach?" [label="no"];
"Partner questions approach?" -> "Return to Phase 2" [label="yes"];
"Partner questions approach?" -> "Requirements unclear?" [label="no"];
"Requirements unclear?" -> "Return to Phase 1" [label="yes"];
"Requirements unclear?" -> "Continue forward" [label="no"];
}
```
**You can and should go backward when:**
- Partner reveals new constraint during Phase 2 or 3 → Return to Phase 1
- Validation shows fundamental gap in requirements → Return to Phase 1
- Partner questions approach during Phase 3 → Return to Phase 2
- Something doesn't make sense → Go back and clarify
**Avoid forcing forward linearly** when going backward would give better results.
**Implementation (if continuing):**
- Ask: "Ready to set up for implementation?"
- Use superpowers:using-git-worktrees to create isolated workspace
- Use superpowers:writing-plans to create detailed implementation plan
## Key Principles
| Principle | Application |
|-----------|-------------|
| **One question at a time** | Phase 1: Single targeted question only for gaps you cant close yourself |
| **Structured choices** | Use AskUserQuestion tool for 2-4 options with trade-offs |
| **YAGNI ruthlessly** | Remove unnecessary features from all designs |
| **Explore alternatives** | Always propose 2-3 approaches before settling |
| **Incremental validation** | Present design in sections, validate each |
| **Flexible progression** | Go backward when needed - flexibility > rigidity |
| **Own the initiative** | Recommend priorities and next steps; ask if you should proceed only when requirements conflict |
| **Announce usage** | State skill usage at start of session |
- **One question at a time** - Don't overwhelm with multiple questions
- **Multiple choice preferred** - Easier to answer than open-ended when possible
- **YAGNI ruthlessly** - Remove unnecessary features from all designs
- **Explore alternatives** - Always propose 2-3 approaches before settling
- **Incremental validation** - Present design in sections, validate each
- **Be flexible** - Go back and clarify when something doesn't make sense

View File

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
Use your brainstorming skill.

View File

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
Use your Executing-Plans skill.

View File

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
Use your Writing-Plans skill.

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
---
name: dispatching-parallel-agents
description: Use when facing 3+ independent failures that can be investigated without shared state or dependencies - dispatches multiple Claude agents to investigate and fix independent problems concurrently
description: Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies
---
# Dispatching Parallel Agents

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
---
name: executing-plans
description: Use when partner provides a complete implementation plan to execute in controlled batches with review checkpoints - loads plan, reviews critically, executes tasks in batches, reports for review between batches
description: Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
---
# Executing Plans

View File

@@ -200,6 +200,10 @@ You understand 1,2,3,6. Unclear on 4,5.
✅ "Understand 1,2,3,6. Need clarification on 4 and 5 before implementing."
```
## GitHub Thread Replies
When replying to inline review comments on GitHub, reply in the comment thread (`gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr}/comments/{id}/replies`), not as a top-level PR comment.
## The Bottom Line
**External feedback = suggestions to evaluate, not orders to follow.**

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
---
name: requesting-code-review
description: Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements - dispatches superpowers:code-reviewer subagent to review implementation against plan or requirements before proceeding
description: Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
---
# Requesting Code Review

View File

@@ -1,194 +0,0 @@
---
name: sharing-skills
description: Use when you've developed a broadly useful skill and want to contribute it upstream via pull request - guides process of branching, committing, pushing, and creating PR to contribute skills back to upstream repository
---
# Sharing Skills
## Overview
Contribute skills from your local branch back to the upstream repository.
**Workflow:** Branch → Edit/Create skill → Commit → Push → PR
## When to Share
**Share when:**
- Skill applies broadly (not project-specific)
- Pattern/technique others would benefit from
- Well-tested and documented
- Follows writing-skills guidelines
**Keep personal when:**
- Project-specific or organization-specific
- Experimental or unstable
- Contains sensitive information
- Too narrow/niche for general use
## Prerequisites
- `gh` CLI installed and authenticated
- Working directory is `~/.config/superpowers/skills/` (your local clone)
- **REQUIRED:** Skill has been tested using writing-skills TDD process
## Sharing Workflow
### 1. Ensure You're on Main and Synced
```bash
cd ~/.config/superpowers/skills/
git checkout main
git pull upstream main
git push origin main # Push to your fork
```
### 2. Create Feature Branch
```bash
# Branch name: add-skillname-skill
skill_name="your-skill-name"
git checkout -b "add-${skill_name}-skill"
```
### 3. Create or Edit Skill
```bash
# Work on your skill in skills/
# Create new skill or edit existing one
# Skill should be in skills/category/skill-name/SKILL.md
```
### 4. Commit Changes
```bash
# Add and commit
git add skills/your-skill-name/
git commit -m "Add ${skill_name} skill
$(cat <<'EOF'
Brief description of what this skill does and why it's useful.
Tested with: [describe testing approach]
EOF
)"
```
### 5. Push to Your Fork
```bash
git push -u origin "add-${skill_name}-skill"
```
### 6. Create Pull Request
```bash
# Create PR to upstream using gh CLI
gh pr create \
--repo upstream-org/upstream-repo \
--title "Add ${skill_name} skill" \
--body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
Brief description of the skill and what problem it solves.
## Testing
Describe how you tested this skill (pressure scenarios, baseline tests, etc.).
## Context
Any additional context about why this skill is needed and how it should be used.
EOF
)"
```
## Complete Example
Here's a complete example of sharing a skill called "async-patterns":
```bash
# 1. Sync with upstream
cd ~/.config/superpowers/skills/
git checkout main
git pull upstream main
git push origin main
# 2. Create branch
git checkout -b "add-async-patterns-skill"
# 3. Create/edit the skill
# (Work on skills/async-patterns/SKILL.md)
# 4. Commit
git add skills/async-patterns/
git commit -m "Add async-patterns skill
Patterns for handling asynchronous operations in tests and application code.
Tested with: Multiple pressure scenarios testing agent compliance."
# 5. Push
git push -u origin "add-async-patterns-skill"
# 6. Create PR
gh pr create \
--repo upstream-org/upstream-repo \
--title "Add async-patterns skill" \
--body "## Summary
Patterns for handling asynchronous operations correctly in tests and application code.
## Testing
Tested with multiple application scenarios. Agents successfully apply patterns to new code.
## Context
Addresses common async pitfalls like race conditions, improper error handling, and timing issues."
```
## After PR is Merged
Once your PR is merged:
1. Sync your local main branch:
```bash
cd ~/.config/superpowers/skills/
git checkout main
git pull upstream main
git push origin main
```
2. Delete the feature branch:
```bash
git branch -d "add-${skill_name}-skill"
git push origin --delete "add-${skill_name}-skill"
```
## Troubleshooting
**"gh: command not found"**
- Install GitHub CLI: https://cli.github.com/
- Authenticate: `gh auth login`
**"Permission denied (publickey)"**
- Check SSH keys: `gh auth status`
- Set up SSH: https://docs.github.com/en/authentication
**"Skill already exists"**
- You're creating a modified version
- Consider different skill name or coordinate with the skill's maintainer
**PR merge conflicts**
- Rebase on latest upstream: `git fetch upstream && git rebase upstream/main`
- Resolve conflicts
- Force push: `git push -f origin your-branch`
## Multi-Skill Contributions
**Do NOT batch multiple skills in one PR.**
Each skill should:
- Have its own feature branch
- Have its own PR
- Be independently reviewable
**Why?** Individual skills can be reviewed, iterated, and merged independently.
## Related Skills
- **writing-skills** - REQUIRED: How to create well-tested skills before sharing

View File

@@ -1,140 +1,159 @@
---
name: subagent-driven-development
description: Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session - dispatches fresh subagent for each task with code review between tasks, enabling fast iteration with quality gates
description: Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session
---
# Subagent-Driven Development
Execute plan by dispatching fresh subagent per task, with code review after each.
Execute plan by dispatching fresh subagent per task, with two-stage review after each: spec compliance review first, then code quality review.
**Core principle:** Fresh subagent per task + review between tasks = high quality, fast iteration
**Core principle:** Fresh subagent per task + two-stage review (spec then quality) = high quality, fast iteration
## Overview
## When to Use
```dot
digraph when_to_use {
"Have implementation plan?" [shape=diamond];
"Tasks mostly independent?" [shape=diamond];
"Stay in this session?" [shape=diamond];
"subagent-driven-development" [shape=box];
"executing-plans" [shape=box];
"Manual execution or brainstorm first" [shape=box];
"Have implementation plan?" -> "Tasks mostly independent?" [label="yes"];
"Have implementation plan?" -> "Manual execution or brainstorm first" [label="no"];
"Tasks mostly independent?" -> "Stay in this session?" [label="yes"];
"Tasks mostly independent?" -> "Manual execution or brainstorm first" [label="no - tightly coupled"];
"Stay in this session?" -> "subagent-driven-development" [label="yes"];
"Stay in this session?" -> "executing-plans" [label="no - parallel session"];
}
```
**vs. Executing Plans (parallel session):**
- Same session (no context switch)
- Fresh subagent per task (no context pollution)
- Code review after each task (catch issues early)
- Two-stage review after each task: spec compliance first, then code quality
- Faster iteration (no human-in-loop between tasks)
**When to use:**
- Staying in this session
- Tasks are mostly independent
- Want continuous progress with quality gates
**When NOT to use:**
- Need to review plan first (use executing-plans)
- Tasks are tightly coupled (manual execution better)
- Plan needs revision (brainstorm first)
## The Process
### 1. Load Plan
```dot
digraph process {
rankdir=TB;
Read plan file, create TodoWrite with all tasks.
subgraph cluster_per_task {
label="Per Task";
"Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)" [shape=box];
"Implementer subagent asks questions?" [shape=diamond];
"Answer questions, provide context" [shape=box];
"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews" [shape=box];
"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)" [shape=box];
"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?" [shape=diamond];
"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps" [shape=box];
"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" [shape=box];
"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?" [shape=diamond];
"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues" [shape=box];
"Mark task complete in TodoWrite" [shape=box];
}
### 2. Execute Task with Subagent
"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite" [shape=box];
"More tasks remain?" [shape=diamond];
"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation" [shape=box];
"Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch" [shape=box style=filled fillcolor=lightgreen];
For each task:
**Dispatch fresh subagent:**
```
Task tool (general-purpose):
description: "Implement Task N: [task name]"
prompt: |
You are implementing Task N from [plan-file].
Read that task carefully. Your job is to:
1. Implement exactly what the task specifies
2. Write tests (following TDD if task says to)
3. Verify implementation works
4. Commit your work
5. Report back
Work from: [directory]
Report: What you implemented, what you tested, test results, files changed, any issues
"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite" -> "Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)";
"Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)" -> "Implementer subagent asks questions?";
"Implementer subagent asks questions?" -> "Answer questions, provide context" [label="yes"];
"Answer questions, provide context" -> "Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)";
"Implementer subagent asks questions?" -> "Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews" [label="no"];
"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews" -> "Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)";
"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)" -> "Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?";
"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?" -> "Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps" [label="no"];
"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps" -> "Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)" [label="re-review"];
"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?" -> "Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" [label="yes"];
"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" -> "Code quality reviewer subagent approves?";
"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?" -> "Implementer subagent fixes quality issues" [label="no"];
"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues" -> "Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" [label="re-review"];
"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?" -> "Mark task complete in TodoWrite" [label="yes"];
"Mark task complete in TodoWrite" -> "More tasks remain?";
"More tasks remain?" -> "Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)" [label="yes"];
"More tasks remain?" -> "Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation" [label="no"];
"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation" -> "Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch";
}
```
**Subagent reports back** with summary of work.
## Prompt Templates
### 3. Review Subagent's Work
**Dispatch code-reviewer subagent:**
```
Task tool (superpowers:code-reviewer):
Use template at requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md
WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED: [from subagent's report]
PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: Task N from [plan-file]
BASE_SHA: [commit before task]
HEAD_SHA: [current commit]
DESCRIPTION: [task summary]
```
**Code reviewer returns:** Strengths, Issues (Critical/Important/Minor), Assessment
### 4. Apply Review Feedback
**If issues found:**
- Fix Critical issues immediately
- Fix Important issues before next task
- Note Minor issues
**Dispatch follow-up subagent if needed:**
```
"Fix issues from code review: [list issues]"
```
### 5. Mark Complete, Next Task
- Mark task as completed in TodoWrite
- Move to next task
- Repeat steps 2-5
### 6. Final Review
After all tasks complete, dispatch final code-reviewer:
- Reviews entire implementation
- Checks all plan requirements met
- Validates overall architecture
### 7. Complete Development
After final review passes:
- Announce: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."
- **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch
- Follow that skill to verify tests, present options, execute choice
- `./implementer-prompt.md` - Dispatch implementer subagent
- `./spec-reviewer-prompt.md` - Dispatch spec compliance reviewer subagent
- `./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md` - Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent
## Example Workflow
```
You: I'm using Subagent-Driven Development to execute this plan.
[Load plan, create TodoWrite]
[Read plan file once: docs/plans/feature-plan.md]
[Extract all 5 tasks with full text and context]
[Create TodoWrite with all tasks]
Task 1: Hook installation script
[Dispatch implementation subagent]
Subagent: Implemented install-hook with tests, 5/5 passing
[Get Task 1 text and context (already extracted)]
[Dispatch implementation subagent with full task text + context]
[Get git SHAs, dispatch code-reviewer]
Reviewer: Strengths: Good test coverage. Issues: None. Ready.
Implementer: "Before I begin - should the hook be installed at user or system level?"
You: "User level (~/.config/superpowers/hooks/)"
Implementer: "Got it. Implementing now..."
[Later] Implementer:
- Implemented install-hook command
- Added tests, 5/5 passing
- Self-review: Found I missed --force flag, added it
- Committed
[Dispatch spec compliance reviewer]
Spec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant - all requirements met, nothing extra
[Get git SHAs, dispatch code quality reviewer]
Code reviewer: Strengths: Good test coverage, clean. Issues: None. Approved.
[Mark Task 1 complete]
Task 2: Recovery modes
[Dispatch implementation subagent]
Subagent: Added verify/repair, 8/8 tests passing
[Get Task 2 text and context (already extracted)]
[Dispatch implementation subagent with full task text + context]
[Dispatch code-reviewer]
Reviewer: Strengths: Solid. Issues (Important): Missing progress reporting
Implementer: [No questions, proceeds]
Implementer:
- Added verify/repair modes
- 8/8 tests passing
- Self-review: All good
- Committed
[Dispatch fix subagent]
Fix subagent: Added progress every 100 conversations
[Dispatch spec compliance reviewer]
Spec reviewer: ❌ Issues:
- Missing: Progress reporting (spec says "report every 100 items")
- Extra: Added --json flag (not requested)
[Verify fix, mark Task 2 complete]
[Implementer fixes issues]
Implementer: Removed --json flag, added progress reporting
[Spec reviewer reviews again]
Spec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant now
[Dispatch code quality reviewer]
Code reviewer: Strengths: Solid. Issues (Important): Magic number (100)
[Implementer fixes]
Implementer: Extracted PROGRESS_INTERVAL constant
[Code reviewer reviews again]
Code reviewer: ✅ Approved
[Mark Task 2 complete]
...
@@ -151,23 +170,57 @@ Done!
- Subagents follow TDD naturally
- Fresh context per task (no confusion)
- Parallel-safe (subagents don't interfere)
- Subagent can ask questions (before AND during work)
**vs. Executing Plans:**
- Same session (no handoff)
- Continuous progress (no waiting)
- Review checkpoints automatic
**Efficiency gains:**
- No file reading overhead (controller provides full text)
- Controller curates exactly what context is needed
- Subagent gets complete information upfront
- Questions surfaced before work begins (not after)
**Quality gates:**
- Self-review catches issues before handoff
- Two-stage review: spec compliance, then code quality
- Review loops ensure fixes actually work
- Spec compliance prevents over/under-building
- Code quality ensures implementation is well-built
**Cost:**
- More subagent invocations
- More subagent invocations (implementer + 2 reviewers per task)
- Controller does more prep work (extracting all tasks upfront)
- Review loops add iterations
- But catches issues early (cheaper than debugging later)
## Red Flags
**Never:**
- Skip code review between tasks
- Proceed with unfixed Critical issues
- Skip reviews (spec compliance OR code quality)
- Proceed with unfixed issues
- Dispatch multiple implementation subagents in parallel (conflicts)
- Implement without reading plan task
- Make subagent read plan file (provide full text instead)
- Skip scene-setting context (subagent needs to understand where task fits)
- Ignore subagent questions (answer before letting them proceed)
- Accept "close enough" on spec compliance (spec reviewer found issues = not done)
- Skip review loops (reviewer found issues = implementer fixes = review again)
- Let implementer self-review replace actual review (both are needed)
- **Start code quality review before spec compliance is ✅** (wrong order)
- Move to next task while either review has open issues
**If subagent asks questions:**
- Answer clearly and completely
- Provide additional context if needed
- Don't rush them into implementation
**If reviewer finds issues:**
- Implementer (same subagent) fixes them
- Reviewer reviews again
- Repeat until approved
- Don't skip the re-review
**If subagent fails task:**
- Dispatch fix subagent with specific instructions
@@ -176,14 +229,12 @@ Done!
## Integration
**Required workflow skills:**
- **writing-plans** - REQUIRED: Creates the plan that this skill executes
- **requesting-code-review** - REQUIRED: Review after each task (see Step 3)
- **finishing-a-development-branch** - REQUIRED: Complete development after all tasks (see Step 7)
- **superpowers:writing-plans** - Creates the plan this skill executes
- **superpowers:requesting-code-review** - Code review template for reviewer subagents
- **superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch** - Complete development after all tasks
**Subagents must use:**
- **test-driven-development** - Subagents follow TDD for each task
**Subagents should use:**
- **superpowers:test-driven-development** - Subagents follow TDD for each task
**Alternative workflow:**
- **executing-plans** - Use for parallel session instead of same-session execution
See code-reviewer template: requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md
- **superpowers:executing-plans** - Use for parallel session instead of same-session execution

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
# Code Quality Reviewer Prompt Template
Use this template when dispatching a code quality reviewer subagent.
**Purpose:** Verify implementation is well-built (clean, tested, maintainable)
**Only dispatch after spec compliance review passes.**
```
Task tool (superpowers:code-reviewer):
Use template at requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md
WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED: [from implementer's report]
PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: Task N from [plan-file]
BASE_SHA: [commit before task]
HEAD_SHA: [current commit]
DESCRIPTION: [task summary]
```
**Code reviewer returns:** Strengths, Issues (Critical/Important/Minor), Assessment

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
# Implementer Subagent Prompt Template
Use this template when dispatching an implementer subagent.
```
Task tool (general-purpose):
description: "Implement Task N: [task name]"
prompt: |
You are implementing Task N: [task name]
## Task Description
[FULL TEXT of task from plan - paste it here, don't make subagent read file]
## Context
[Scene-setting: where this fits, dependencies, architectural context]
## Before You Begin
If you have questions about:
- The requirements or acceptance criteria
- The approach or implementation strategy
- Dependencies or assumptions
- Anything unclear in the task description
**Ask them now.** Raise any concerns before starting work.
## Your Job
Once you're clear on requirements:
1. Implement exactly what the task specifies
2. Write tests (following TDD if task says to)
3. Verify implementation works
4. Commit your work
5. Self-review (see below)
6. Report back
Work from: [directory]
**While you work:** If you encounter something unexpected or unclear, **ask questions**.
It's always OK to pause and clarify. Don't guess or make assumptions.
## Before Reporting Back: Self-Review
Review your work with fresh eyes. Ask yourself:
**Completeness:**
- Did I fully implement everything in the spec?
- Did I miss any requirements?
- Are there edge cases I didn't handle?
**Quality:**
- Is this my best work?
- Are names clear and accurate (match what things do, not how they work)?
- Is the code clean and maintainable?
**Discipline:**
- Did I avoid overbuilding (YAGNI)?
- Did I only build what was requested?
- Did I follow existing patterns in the codebase?
**Testing:**
- Do tests actually verify behavior (not just mock behavior)?
- Did I follow TDD if required?
- Are tests comprehensive?
If you find issues during self-review, fix them now before reporting.
## Report Format
When done, report:
- What you implemented
- What you tested and test results
- Files changed
- Self-review findings (if any)
- Any issues or concerns
```

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
# Spec Compliance Reviewer Prompt Template
Use this template when dispatching a spec compliance reviewer subagent.
**Purpose:** Verify implementer built what was requested (nothing more, nothing less)
```
Task tool (general-purpose):
description: "Review spec compliance for Task N"
prompt: |
You are reviewing whether an implementation matches its specification.
## What Was Requested
[FULL TEXT of task requirements]
## What Implementer Claims They Built
[From implementer's report]
## CRITICAL: Do Not Trust the Report
The implementer finished suspiciously quickly. Their report may be incomplete,
inaccurate, or optimistic. You MUST verify everything independently.
**DO NOT:**
- Take their word for what they implemented
- Trust their claims about completeness
- Accept their interpretation of requirements
**DO:**
- Read the actual code they wrote
- Compare actual implementation to requirements line by line
- Check for missing pieces they claimed to implement
- Look for extra features they didn't mention
## Your Job
Read the implementation code and verify:
**Missing requirements:**
- Did they implement everything that was requested?
- Are there requirements they skipped or missed?
- Did they claim something works but didn't actually implement it?
**Extra/unneeded work:**
- Did they build things that weren't requested?
- Did they over-engineer or add unnecessary features?
- Did they add "nice to haves" that weren't in spec?
**Misunderstandings:**
- Did they interpret requirements differently than intended?
- Did they solve the wrong problem?
- Did they implement the right feature but wrong way?
**Verify by reading code, not by trusting report.**
Report:
- ✅ Spec compliant (if everything matches after code inspection)
- ❌ Issues found: [list specifically what's missing or extra, with file:line references]
```

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
---
name: systematic-debugging
description: Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes - four-phase framework (root cause investigation, pattern analysis, hypothesis testing, implementation) that ensures understanding before attempting solutions
description: Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
---
# Systematic Debugging
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ You MUST complete each phase before proceeding to the next.
**WHEN error is deep in call stack:**
**REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** Use superpowers:root-cause-tracing for backward tracing technique
See `root-cause-tracing.md` in this directory for the complete backward tracing technique.
**Quick version:**
- Where does bad value originate?
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ You MUST complete each phase before proceeding to the next.
- Automated test if possible
- One-off test script if no framework
- MUST have before fixing
- **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** Use superpowers:test-driven-development for writing proper failing tests
- Use the `superpowers:test-driven-development` skill for writing proper failing tests
2. **Implement Single Fix**
- Address the root cause identified
@@ -275,16 +275,17 @@ If systematic investigation reveals issue is truly environmental, timing-depende
**But:** 95% of "no root cause" cases are incomplete investigation.
## Integration with Other Skills
## Supporting Techniques
**This skill requires using:**
- **root-cause-tracing** - REQUIRED when error is deep in call stack (see Phase 1, Step 5)
- **test-driven-development** - REQUIRED for creating failing test case (see Phase 4, Step 1)
These techniques are part of systematic debugging and available in this directory:
**Complementary skills:**
- **defense-in-depth** - Add validation at multiple layers after finding root cause
- **condition-based-waiting** - Replace arbitrary timeouts identified in Phase 2
- **verification-before-completion** - Verify fix worked before claiming success
- **`root-cause-tracing.md`** - Trace bugs backward through call stack to find original trigger
- **`defense-in-depth.md`** - Add validation at multiple layers after finding root cause
- **`condition-based-waiting.md`** - Replace arbitrary timeouts with condition polling
**Related skills:**
- **superpowers:test-driven-development** - For creating failing test case (Phase 4, Step 1)
- **superpowers:verification-before-completion** - Verify fix worked before claiming success
## Real-World Impact

View File

@@ -1,8 +1,3 @@
---
name: condition-based-waiting
description: Use when tests have race conditions, timing dependencies, or inconsistent pass/fail behavior - replaces arbitrary timeouts with condition polling to wait for actual state changes, eliminating flaky tests from timing guesses
---
# Condition-Based Waiting
## Overview
@@ -84,7 +79,7 @@ async function waitFor<T>(
}
```
See @example.ts for complete implementation with domain-specific helpers (`waitForEvent`, `waitForEventCount`, `waitForEventMatch`) from actual debugging session.
See `condition-based-waiting-example.ts` in this directory for complete implementation with domain-specific helpers (`waitForEvent`, `waitForEventCount`, `waitForEventMatch`) from actual debugging session.
## Common Mistakes

View File

@@ -1,8 +1,3 @@
---
name: defense-in-depth
description: Use when invalid data causes failures deep in execution, requiring validation at multiple system layers - validates at every layer data passes through to make bugs structurally impossible
---
# Defense-in-Depth Validation
## Overview

View File

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
#!/bin/bash
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Bisection script to find which test creates unwanted files/state
# Usage: ./find-polluter.sh <file_or_dir_to_check> <test_pattern>
# Example: ./find-polluter.sh '.git' 'src/**/*.test.ts'

View File

@@ -1,8 +1,3 @@
---
name: root-cause-tracing
description: Use when errors occur deep in execution and you need to trace back to find the original trigger - systematically traces bugs backward through call stack, adding instrumentation when needed, to identify source of invalid data or incorrect behavior
---
# Root Cause Tracing
## Overview
@@ -103,7 +98,7 @@ npm test 2>&1 | grep 'DEBUG git init'
If something appears during tests but you don't know which test:
Use the bisection script: @find-polluter.sh
Use the bisection script `find-polluter.sh` in this directory:
```bash
./find-polluter.sh '.git' 'src/**/*.test.ts'

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
---
name: test-driven-development
description: Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code - write the test first, watch it fail, write minimal code to pass; ensures tests actually verify behavior by requiring failure first
description: Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code
---
# Test-Driven Development (TDD)
@@ -354,6 +354,13 @@ Bug found? Write failing test reproducing it. Follow TDD cycle. Test proves fix
Never fix bugs without a test.
## Testing Anti-Patterns
When adding mocks or test utilities, read @testing-anti-patterns.md to avoid common pitfalls:
- Testing mock behavior instead of real behavior
- Adding test-only methods to production classes
- Mocking without understanding dependencies
## Final Rule
```

View File

@@ -1,10 +1,7 @@
---
name: testing-anti-patterns
description: Use when writing or changing tests, adding mocks, or tempted to add test-only methods to production code - prevents testing mock behavior, production pollution with test-only methods, and mocking without understanding dependencies
---
# Testing Anti-Patterns
**Load this reference when:** writing or changing tests, adding mocks, or tempted to add test-only methods to production code.
## Overview
Tests must verify real behavior, not mock behavior. Mocks are a means to isolate, not the thing being tested.

View File

@@ -52,14 +52,14 @@ Which would you prefer?
### For Project-Local Directories (.worktrees or worktrees)
**MUST verify .gitignore before creating worktree:**
**MUST verify directory is ignored before creating worktree:**
```bash
# Check if directory pattern in .gitignore
grep -q "^\.worktrees/$" .gitignore || grep -q "^worktrees/$" .gitignore
# Check if directory is ignored (respects local, global, and system gitignore)
git check-ignore -q .worktrees 2>/dev/null || git check-ignore -q worktrees 2>/dev/null
```
**If NOT in .gitignore:**
**If NOT ignored:**
Per Jesse's rule "Fix broken things immediately":
1. Add appropriate line to .gitignore
@@ -145,29 +145,33 @@ Ready to implement <feature-name>
| Situation | Action |
|-----------|--------|
| `.worktrees/` exists | Use it (verify .gitignore) |
| `worktrees/` exists | Use it (verify .gitignore) |
| `.worktrees/` exists | Use it (verify ignored) |
| `worktrees/` exists | Use it (verify ignored) |
| Both exist | Use `.worktrees/` |
| Neither exists | Check CLAUDE.md → Ask user |
| Directory not in .gitignore | Add it immediately + commit |
| Directory not ignored | Add to .gitignore + commit |
| Tests fail during baseline | Report failures + ask |
| No package.json/Cargo.toml | Skip dependency install |
## Common Mistakes
**Skipping .gitignore verification**
- **Problem:** Worktree contents get tracked, pollute git status
- **Fix:** Always grep .gitignore before creating project-local worktree
### Skipping ignore verification
- **Problem:** Worktree contents get tracked, pollute git status
- **Fix:** Always use `git check-ignore` before creating project-local worktree
### Assuming directory location
**Assuming directory location**
- **Problem:** Creates inconsistency, violates project conventions
- **Fix:** Follow priority: existing > CLAUDE.md > ask
**Proceeding with failing tests**
### Proceeding with failing tests
- **Problem:** Can't distinguish new bugs from pre-existing issues
- **Fix:** Report failures, get explicit permission to proceed
**Hardcoding setup commands**
### Hardcoding setup commands
- **Problem:** Breaks on projects using different tools
- **Fix:** Auto-detect from project files (package.json, etc.)
@@ -177,7 +181,7 @@ Ready to implement <feature-name>
You: I'm using the using-git-worktrees skill to set up an isolated workspace.
[Check .worktrees/ - exists]
[Verify .gitignore - contains .worktrees/]
[Verify ignored - git check-ignore confirms .worktrees/ is ignored]
[Create worktree: git worktree add .worktrees/auth -b feature/auth]
[Run npm install]
[Run npm test - 47 passing]
@@ -190,7 +194,7 @@ Ready to implement auth feature
## Red Flags
**Never:**
- Create worktree without .gitignore verification (project-local)
- Create worktree without verifying it's ignored (project-local)
- Skip baseline test verification
- Proceed with failing tests without asking
- Assume directory location when ambiguous
@@ -198,7 +202,7 @@ Ready to implement auth feature
**Always:**
- Follow directory priority: existing > CLAUDE.md > ask
- Verify .gitignore for project-local
- Verify directory is ignored for project-local
- Auto-detect and run project setup
- Verify clean test baseline

View File

@@ -1,101 +1,86 @@
---
name: using-superpowers
description: Use when starting any conversation - establishes mandatory workflows for finding and using skills, including using Skill tool before announcing usage, following brainstorming before coding, and creating TodoWrite todos for checklists
description: Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions
---
<EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT>
If you think there is even a 1% chance a skill might apply to what you are doing, you ABSOLUTELY MUST read the skill.
If you think there is even a 1% chance a skill might apply to what you are doing, you ABSOLUTELY MUST invoke the skill.
IF A SKILL APPLIES TO YOUR TASK, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE. YOU MUST USE IT.
This is not negotiable. This is not optional. You cannot rationalize your way out of this.
</EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT>
# Getting Started with Skills
## How to Access Skills
## MANDATORY FIRST RESPONSE PROTOCOL
**In Claude Code:** Use the `Skill` tool. When you invoke a skill, its content is loaded and presented to you—follow it directly. Never use the Read tool on skill files.
Before responding to ANY user message, you MUST complete this checklist:
**In other environments:** Check your platform's documentation for how skills are loaded.
1. ☐ List available skills in your mind
2. ☐ Ask yourself: "Does ANY skill match this request?"
3. ☐ If yes → Use the Skill tool to read and run the skill file
4. ☐ Announce which skill you're using
5. ☐ Follow the skill exactly
# Using Skills
**Responding WITHOUT completing this checklist = automatic failure.**
## The Rule
## Critical Rules
**Check for skills BEFORE ANY RESPONSE.** This includes clarifying questions. Even 1% chance means invoke the Skill tool first.
1. **Follow mandatory workflows.** Brainstorming before coding. Check for relevant skills before ANY task.
```dot
digraph skill_flow {
"User message received" [shape=doublecircle];
"Might any skill apply?" [shape=diamond];
"Invoke Skill tool" [shape=box];
"Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" [shape=box];
"Has checklist?" [shape=diamond];
"Create TodoWrite todo per item" [shape=box];
"Follow skill exactly" [shape=box];
"Respond (including clarifications)" [shape=doublecircle];
2. Execute skills with the Skill tool
"User message received" -> "Might any skill apply?";
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Invoke Skill tool" [label="yes, even 1%"];
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Respond (including clarifications)" [label="definitely not"];
"Invoke Skill tool" -> "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'";
"Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" -> "Has checklist?";
"Has checklist?" -> "Create TodoWrite todo per item" [label="yes"];
"Has checklist?" -> "Follow skill exactly" [label="no"];
"Create TodoWrite todo per item" -> "Follow skill exactly";
}
```
## Common Rationalizations That Mean You're About To Fail
## Red Flags
If you catch yourself thinking ANY of these thoughts, STOP. You are rationalizing. Check for and use the skill.
These thoughts mean STOP—you're rationalizing:
- "This is just a simple question" → WRONG. Questions are tasks. Check for skills.
- "I can check git/files quickly" → WRONG. Files don't have conversation context. Check for skills.
- "Let me gather information first" → WRONG. Skills tell you HOW to gather information. Check for skills.
- "This doesn't need a formal skill" → WRONG. If a skill exists for it, use it.
- "I remember this skill" → WRONG. Skills evolve. Run the current version.
- "This doesn't count as a task" → WRONG. If you're taking action, it's a task. Check for skills.
- "The skill is overkill for this" → WRONG. Skills exist because simple things become complex. Use it.
- "I'll just do this one thing first" → WRONG. Check for skills BEFORE doing anything.
| Thought | Reality |
|---------|---------|
| "This is just a simple question" | Questions are tasks. Check for skills. |
| "I need more context first" | Skill check comes BEFORE clarifying questions. |
| "Let me explore the codebase first" | Skills tell you HOW to explore. Check first. |
| "I can check git/files quickly" | Files lack conversation context. Check for skills. |
| "Let me gather information first" | Skills tell you HOW to gather information. |
| "This doesn't need a formal skill" | If a skill exists, use it. |
| "I remember this skill" | Skills evolve. Read current version. |
| "This doesn't count as a task" | Action = task. Check for skills. |
| "The skill is overkill" | Simple things become complex. Use it. |
| "I'll just do this one thing first" | Check BEFORE doing anything. |
| "This feels productive" | Undisciplined action wastes time. Skills prevent this. |
**Why:** Skills document proven techniques that save time and prevent mistakes. Not using available skills means repeating solved problems and making known errors.
## Skill Priority
If a skill for your task exists, you must use it or you will fail at your task.
When multiple skills could apply, use this order:
## Skills with Checklists
1. **Process skills first** (brainstorming, debugging) - these determine HOW to approach the task
2. **Implementation skills second** (frontend-design, mcp-builder) - these guide execution
If a skill has a checklist, YOU MUST create TodoWrite todos for EACH item.
"Let's build X" → brainstorming first, then implementation skills.
"Fix this bug" → debugging first, then domain-specific skills.
**Don't:**
- Work through checklist mentally
- Skip creating todos "to save time"
- Batch multiple items into one todo
- Mark complete without doing them
## Skill Types
**Why:** Checklists without TodoWrite tracking = steps get skipped. Every time. The overhead of TodoWrite is tiny compared to the cost of missing steps.
**Rigid** (TDD, debugging): Follow exactly. Don't adapt away discipline.
## Announcing Skill Usage
**Flexible** (patterns): Adapt principles to context.
Before using a skill, announce that you are using it.
"I'm using [Skill Name] to [what you're doing]."
The skill itself tells you which.
**Examples:**
- "I'm using the brainstorming skill to refine your idea into a design."
- "I'm using the test-driven-development skill to implement this feature."
## User Instructions
**Why:** Transparency helps your human partner understand your process and catch errors early. It also confirms you actually read the skill.
# About these skills
**Many skills contain rigid rules (TDD, debugging, verification).** Follow them exactly. Don't adapt away the discipline.
**Some skills are flexible patterns (architecture, naming).** Adapt core principles to your context.
The skill itself tells you which type it is.
## Instructions ≠ Permission to Skip Workflows
Your human partner's specific instructions describe WHAT to do, not HOW.
"Add X", "Fix Y" = the goal, NOT permission to skip brainstorming, TDD, or RED-GREEN-REFACTOR.
**Red flags:** "Instruction was specific" • "Seems simple" • "Workflow is overkill"
**Why:** Specific instructions mean clear requirements, which is when workflows matter MOST. Skipping process on "simple" tasks is how simple tasks become complex problems.
## Summary
**Starting any task:**
1. If relevant skill exists → Use the skill
3. Announce you're using it
4. Follow what it says
**Skill has checklist?** TodoWrite for every item.
**Finding a relevant skill = mandatory to read and use it. Not optional.**
Instructions say WHAT, not HOW. "Add X" or "Fix Y" doesn't mean skip workflows.

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
---
name: writing-plans
description: Use when design is complete and you need detailed implementation tasks for engineers with zero codebase context - creates comprehensive implementation plans with exact file paths, complete code examples, and verification steps assuming engineer has minimal domain knowledge
description: Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code
---
# Writing Plans

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
---
name: writing-skills
description: Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment - applies TDD to process documentation by testing with subagents before writing, iterating until bulletproof against rationalization
description: Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment
---
# Writing Skills
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ The entire skill creation process follows RED-GREEN-REFACTOR.
- One-off solutions
- Standard practices well-documented elsewhere
- Project-specific conventions (put in CLAUDE.md)
- Mechanical constraints (if it's enforceable with regex/validation, automate it—save documentation for judgment calls)
## Skill Types
@@ -95,15 +96,16 @@ skills/
- Only two fields supported: `name` and `description`
- Max 1024 characters total
- `name`: Use letters, numbers, and hyphens only (no parentheses, special chars)
- `description`: Third-person, includes BOTH what it does AND when to use it
- `description`: Third-person, describes ONLY when to use (NOT what it does)
- Start with "Use when..." to focus on triggering conditions
- Include specific symptoms, situations, and contexts
- **NEVER summarize the skill's process or workflow** (see CSO section for why)
- Keep under 500 characters if possible
```markdown
---
name: Skill-Name-With-Hyphens
description: Use when [specific triggering conditions and symptoms] - [what the skill does and how it helps, written in third person]
description: Use when [specific triggering conditions and symptoms]
---
# Skill Name
@@ -143,7 +145,31 @@ Concrete results
**Purpose:** Claude reads description to decide which skills to load for a given task. Make it answer: "Should I read this skill right now?"
**Format:** Start with "Use when..." to focus on triggering conditions, then explain what it does
**Format:** Start with "Use when..." to focus on triggering conditions
**CRITICAL: Description = When to Use, NOT What the Skill Does**
The description should ONLY describe triggering conditions. Do NOT summarize the skill's process or workflow in the description.
**Why this matters:** Testing revealed that when a description summarizes the skill's workflow, Claude may follow the description instead of reading the full skill content. A description saying "code review between tasks" caused Claude to do ONE review, even though the skill's flowchart clearly showed TWO reviews (spec compliance then code quality).
When the description was changed to just "Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks" (no workflow summary), Claude correctly read the flowchart and followed the two-stage review process.
**The trap:** Descriptions that summarize workflow create a shortcut Claude will take. The skill body becomes documentation Claude skips.
```yaml
# ❌ BAD: Summarizes workflow - Claude may follow this instead of reading skill
description: Use when executing plans - dispatches subagent per task with code review between tasks
# ❌ BAD: Too much process detail
description: Use for TDD - write test first, watch it fail, write minimal code, refactor
# ✅ GOOD: Just triggering conditions, no workflow summary
description: Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session
# ✅ GOOD: Triggering conditions only
description: Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code
```
**Content:**
- Use concrete triggers, symptoms, and situations that signal this skill applies
@@ -151,6 +177,7 @@ Concrete results
- Keep triggers technology-agnostic unless the skill itself is technology-specific
- If skill is technology-specific, make that explicit in the trigger
- Write in third person (injected into system prompt)
- **NEVER summarize the skill's process or workflow**
```yaml
# ❌ BAD: Too abstract, vague, doesn't include when to use
@@ -162,11 +189,11 @@ description: I can help you with async tests when they're flaky
# ❌ BAD: Mentions technology but skill isn't specific to it
description: Use when tests use setTimeout/sleep and are flaky
# ✅ GOOD: Starts with "Use when", describes problem, then what it does
description: Use when tests have race conditions, timing dependencies, or pass/fail inconsistently - replaces arbitrary timeouts with condition polling for reliable async tests
# ✅ GOOD: Starts with "Use when", describes problem, no workflow
description: Use when tests have race conditions, timing dependencies, or pass/fail inconsistently
# ✅ GOOD: Technology-specific skill with explicit trigger
description: Use when using React Router and handling authentication redirects - provides patterns for protected routes and auth state management
description: Use when using React Router and handling authentication redirects
```
### 2. Keyword Coverage
@@ -181,7 +208,7 @@ Use words Claude would search for:
**Use active voice, verb-first:**
-`creating-skills` not `skill-creation`
-`testing-skills-with-subagents` not `subagent-skill-testing`
-`condition-based-waiting` not `async-test-helpers`
### 4. Token Efficiency (Critical)
@@ -288,6 +315,12 @@ digraph when_flowchart {
See @graphviz-conventions.dot for graphviz style rules.
**Visualizing for your human partner:** Use `render-graphs.js` in this directory to render a skill's flowcharts to SVG:
```bash
./render-graphs.js ../some-skill # Each diagram separately
./render-graphs.js ../some-skill --combine # All diagrams in one SVG
```
## Code Examples
**One excellent example beats many mediocre ones**
@@ -520,7 +553,7 @@ Run same scenarios WITH skill. Agent should now comply.
Agent found new rationalization? Add explicit counter. Re-test until bulletproof.
**REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** Use superpowers:testing-skills-with-subagents for the complete testing methodology:
**Testing methodology:** See @testing-skills-with-subagents.md for the complete testing methodology:
- How to write pressure scenarios
- Pressure types (time, sunk cost, authority, exhaustion)
- Plugging holes systematically

View File

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ For conceptual background on how Skills work, see the [Skills overview](/en/docs
### Concise is key
The [context window](/en/docs/build-with-claude/context-windows) is a public good. Your Skill shares the context window with everything else Claude needs to know, including:
The [context window](https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/context-windows) is a public good. Your Skill shares the context window with everything else Claude needs to know, including:
* The system prompt
* Conversation history

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
#!/usr/bin/env node
/**
* Render graphviz diagrams from a skill's SKILL.md to SVG files.
*
* Usage:
* ./render-graphs.js <skill-directory> # Render each diagram separately
* ./render-graphs.js <skill-directory> --combine # Combine all into one diagram
*
* Extracts all ```dot blocks from SKILL.md and renders to SVG.
* Useful for helping your human partner visualize the process flows.
*
* Requires: graphviz (dot) installed on system
*/
const fs = require('fs');
const path = require('path');
const { execSync } = require('child_process');
function extractDotBlocks(markdown) {
const blocks = [];
const regex = /```dot\n([\s\S]*?)```/g;
let match;
while ((match = regex.exec(markdown)) !== null) {
const content = match[1].trim();
// Extract digraph name
const nameMatch = content.match(/digraph\s+(\w+)/);
const name = nameMatch ? nameMatch[1] : `graph_${blocks.length + 1}`;
blocks.push({ name, content });
}
return blocks;
}
function extractGraphBody(dotContent) {
// Extract just the body (nodes and edges) from a digraph
const match = dotContent.match(/digraph\s+\w+\s*\{([\s\S]*)\}/);
if (!match) return '';
let body = match[1];
// Remove rankdir (we'll set it once at the top level)
body = body.replace(/^\s*rankdir\s*=\s*\w+\s*;?\s*$/gm, '');
return body.trim();
}
function combineGraphs(blocks, skillName) {
const bodies = blocks.map((block, i) => {
const body = extractGraphBody(block.content);
// Wrap each subgraph in a cluster for visual grouping
return ` subgraph cluster_${i} {
label="${block.name}";
${body.split('\n').map(line => ' ' + line).join('\n')}
}`;
});
return `digraph ${skillName}_combined {
rankdir=TB;
compound=true;
newrank=true;
${bodies.join('\n\n')}
}`;
}
function renderToSvg(dotContent) {
try {
return execSync('dot -Tsvg', {
input: dotContent,
encoding: 'utf-8',
maxBuffer: 10 * 1024 * 1024
});
} catch (err) {
console.error('Error running dot:', err.message);
if (err.stderr) console.error(err.stderr.toString());
return null;
}
}
function main() {
const args = process.argv.slice(2);
const combine = args.includes('--combine');
const skillDirArg = args.find(a => !a.startsWith('--'));
if (!skillDirArg) {
console.error('Usage: render-graphs.js <skill-directory> [--combine]');
console.error('');
console.error('Options:');
console.error(' --combine Combine all diagrams into one SVG');
console.error('');
console.error('Example:');
console.error(' ./render-graphs.js ../subagent-driven-development');
console.error(' ./render-graphs.js ../subagent-driven-development --combine');
process.exit(1);
}
const skillDir = path.resolve(skillDirArg);
const skillFile = path.join(skillDir, 'SKILL.md');
const skillName = path.basename(skillDir).replace(/-/g, '_');
if (!fs.existsSync(skillFile)) {
console.error(`Error: ${skillFile} not found`);
process.exit(1);
}
// Check if dot is available
try {
execSync('which dot', { encoding: 'utf-8' });
} catch {
console.error('Error: graphviz (dot) not found. Install with:');
console.error(' brew install graphviz # macOS');
console.error(' apt install graphviz # Linux');
process.exit(1);
}
const markdown = fs.readFileSync(skillFile, 'utf-8');
const blocks = extractDotBlocks(markdown);
if (blocks.length === 0) {
console.log('No ```dot blocks found in', skillFile);
process.exit(0);
}
console.log(`Found ${blocks.length} diagram(s) in ${path.basename(skillDir)}/SKILL.md`);
const outputDir = path.join(skillDir, 'diagrams');
if (!fs.existsSync(outputDir)) {
fs.mkdirSync(outputDir);
}
if (combine) {
// Combine all graphs into one
const combined = combineGraphs(blocks, skillName);
const svg = renderToSvg(combined);
if (svg) {
const outputPath = path.join(outputDir, `${skillName}_combined.svg`);
fs.writeFileSync(outputPath, svg);
console.log(` Rendered: ${skillName}_combined.svg`);
// Also write the dot source for debugging
const dotPath = path.join(outputDir, `${skillName}_combined.dot`);
fs.writeFileSync(dotPath, combined);
console.log(` Source: ${skillName}_combined.dot`);
} else {
console.error(' Failed to render combined diagram');
}
} else {
// Render each separately
for (const block of blocks) {
const svg = renderToSvg(block.content);
if (svg) {
const outputPath = path.join(outputDir, `${block.name}.svg`);
fs.writeFileSync(outputPath, svg);
console.log(` Rendered: ${block.name}.svg`);
} else {
console.error(` Failed: ${block.name}`);
}
}
}
console.log(`\nOutput: ${outputDir}/`);
}
main();

View File

@@ -1,10 +1,7 @@
---
name: testing-skills-with-subagents
description: Use when creating or editing skills, before deployment, to verify they work under pressure and resist rationalization - applies RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle to process documentation by running baseline without skill, writing to address failures, iterating to close loopholes
---
# Testing Skills With Subagents
**Load this reference when:** creating or editing skills, before deployment, to verify they work under pressure and resist rationalization.
## Overview
**Testing skills is just TDD applied to process documentation.**

158
tests/claude-code/README.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
# Claude Code Skills Tests
Automated tests for superpowers skills using Claude Code CLI.
## Overview
This test suite verifies that skills are loaded correctly and Claude follows them as expected. Tests invoke Claude Code in headless mode (`claude -p`) and verify the behavior.
## Requirements
- Claude Code CLI installed and in PATH (`claude --version` should work)
- Local superpowers plugin installed (see main README for installation)
## Running Tests
### Run all fast tests (recommended):
```bash
./run-skill-tests.sh
```
### Run integration tests (slow, 10-30 minutes):
```bash
./run-skill-tests.sh --integration
```
### Run specific test:
```bash
./run-skill-tests.sh --test test-subagent-driven-development.sh
```
### Run with verbose output:
```bash
./run-skill-tests.sh --verbose
```
### Set custom timeout:
```bash
./run-skill-tests.sh --timeout 1800 # 30 minutes for integration tests
```
## Test Structure
### test-helpers.sh
Common functions for skills testing:
- `run_claude "prompt" [timeout]` - Run Claude with prompt
- `assert_contains output pattern name` - Verify pattern exists
- `assert_not_contains output pattern name` - Verify pattern absent
- `assert_count output pattern count name` - Verify exact count
- `assert_order output pattern_a pattern_b name` - Verify order
- `create_test_project` - Create temp test directory
- `create_test_plan project_dir` - Create sample plan file
### Test Files
Each test file:
1. Sources `test-helpers.sh`
2. Runs Claude Code with specific prompts
3. Verifies expected behavior using assertions
4. Returns 0 on success, non-zero on failure
## Example Test
```bash
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
source "$SCRIPT_DIR/test-helpers.sh"
echo "=== Test: My Skill ==="
# Ask Claude about the skill
output=$(run_claude "What does the my-skill skill do?" 30)
# Verify response
assert_contains "$output" "expected behavior" "Skill describes behavior"
echo "=== All tests passed ==="
```
## Current Tests
### Fast Tests (run by default)
#### test-subagent-driven-development.sh
Tests skill content and requirements (~2 minutes):
- Skill loading and accessibility
- Workflow ordering (spec compliance before code quality)
- Self-review requirements documented
- Plan reading efficiency documented
- Spec compliance reviewer skepticism documented
- Review loops documented
- Task context provision documented
### Integration Tests (use --integration flag)
#### test-subagent-driven-development-integration.sh
Full workflow execution test (~10-30 minutes):
- Creates real test project with Node.js setup
- Creates implementation plan with 2 tasks
- Executes plan using subagent-driven-development
- Verifies actual behaviors:
- Plan read once at start (not per task)
- Full task text provided in subagent prompts
- Subagents perform self-review before reporting
- Spec compliance review happens before code quality
- Spec reviewer reads code independently
- Working implementation is produced
- Tests pass
- Proper git commits created
**What it tests:**
- The workflow actually works end-to-end
- Our improvements are actually applied
- Subagents follow the skill correctly
- Final code is functional and tested
## Adding New Tests
1. Create new test file: `test-<skill-name>.sh`
2. Source test-helpers.sh
3. Write tests using `run_claude` and assertions
4. Add to test list in `run-skill-tests.sh`
5. Make executable: `chmod +x test-<skill-name>.sh`
## Timeout Considerations
- Default timeout: 5 minutes per test
- Claude Code may take time to respond
- Adjust with `--timeout` if needed
- Tests should be focused to avoid long runs
## Debugging Failed Tests
With `--verbose`, you'll see full Claude output:
```bash
./run-skill-tests.sh --verbose --test test-subagent-driven-development.sh
```
Without verbose, only failures show output.
## CI/CD Integration
To run in CI:
```bash
# Run with explicit timeout for CI environments
./run-skill-tests.sh --timeout 900
# Exit code 0 = success, non-zero = failure
```
## Notes
- Tests verify skill *instructions*, not full execution
- Full workflow tests would be very slow
- Focus on verifying key skill requirements
- Tests should be deterministic
- Avoid testing implementation details

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
Analyze token usage from Claude Code session transcripts.
Breaks down usage by main session and individual subagents.
"""
import json
import sys
from pathlib import Path
from collections import defaultdict
def analyze_main_session(filepath):
"""Analyze a session file and return token usage broken down by agent."""
main_usage = {
'input_tokens': 0,
'output_tokens': 0,
'cache_creation': 0,
'cache_read': 0,
'messages': 0
}
# Track usage per subagent
subagent_usage = defaultdict(lambda: {
'input_tokens': 0,
'output_tokens': 0,
'cache_creation': 0,
'cache_read': 0,
'messages': 0,
'description': None
})
with open(filepath, 'r') as f:
for line in f:
try:
data = json.loads(line)
# Main session assistant messages
if data.get('type') == 'assistant' and 'message' in data:
main_usage['messages'] += 1
msg_usage = data['message'].get('usage', {})
main_usage['input_tokens'] += msg_usage.get('input_tokens', 0)
main_usage['output_tokens'] += msg_usage.get('output_tokens', 0)
main_usage['cache_creation'] += msg_usage.get('cache_creation_input_tokens', 0)
main_usage['cache_read'] += msg_usage.get('cache_read_input_tokens', 0)
# Subagent tool results
if data.get('type') == 'user' and 'toolUseResult' in data:
result = data['toolUseResult']
if 'usage' in result and 'agentId' in result:
agent_id = result['agentId']
usage = result['usage']
# Get description from prompt if available
if subagent_usage[agent_id]['description'] is None:
prompt = result.get('prompt', '')
# Extract first line as description
first_line = prompt.split('\n')[0] if prompt else f"agent-{agent_id}"
if first_line.startswith('You are '):
first_line = first_line[8:] # Remove "You are "
subagent_usage[agent_id]['description'] = first_line[:60]
subagent_usage[agent_id]['messages'] += 1
subagent_usage[agent_id]['input_tokens'] += usage.get('input_tokens', 0)
subagent_usage[agent_id]['output_tokens'] += usage.get('output_tokens', 0)
subagent_usage[agent_id]['cache_creation'] += usage.get('cache_creation_input_tokens', 0)
subagent_usage[agent_id]['cache_read'] += usage.get('cache_read_input_tokens', 0)
except:
pass
return main_usage, dict(subagent_usage)
def format_tokens(n):
"""Format token count with thousands separators."""
return f"{n:,}"
def calculate_cost(usage, input_cost_per_m=3.0, output_cost_per_m=15.0):
"""Calculate estimated cost in dollars."""
total_input = usage['input_tokens'] + usage['cache_creation'] + usage['cache_read']
input_cost = total_input * input_cost_per_m / 1_000_000
output_cost = usage['output_tokens'] * output_cost_per_m / 1_000_000
return input_cost + output_cost
def main():
if len(sys.argv) < 2:
print("Usage: analyze-token-usage.py <session-file.jsonl>")
sys.exit(1)
main_session_file = sys.argv[1]
if not Path(main_session_file).exists():
print(f"Error: Session file not found: {main_session_file}")
sys.exit(1)
# Analyze the session
main_usage, subagent_usage = analyze_main_session(main_session_file)
print("=" * 100)
print("TOKEN USAGE ANALYSIS")
print("=" * 100)
print()
# Print breakdown
print("Usage Breakdown:")
print("-" * 100)
print(f"{'Agent':<15} {'Description':<35} {'Msgs':>5} {'Input':>10} {'Output':>10} {'Cache':>10} {'Cost':>8}")
print("-" * 100)
# Main session
cost = calculate_cost(main_usage)
print(f"{'main':<15} {'Main session (coordinator)':<35} "
f"{main_usage['messages']:>5} "
f"{format_tokens(main_usage['input_tokens']):>10} "
f"{format_tokens(main_usage['output_tokens']):>10} "
f"{format_tokens(main_usage['cache_read']):>10} "
f"${cost:>7.2f}")
# Subagents (sorted by agent ID)
for agent_id in sorted(subagent_usage.keys()):
usage = subagent_usage[agent_id]
cost = calculate_cost(usage)
desc = usage['description'] or f"agent-{agent_id}"
print(f"{agent_id:<15} {desc:<35} "
f"{usage['messages']:>5} "
f"{format_tokens(usage['input_tokens']):>10} "
f"{format_tokens(usage['output_tokens']):>10} "
f"{format_tokens(usage['cache_read']):>10} "
f"${cost:>7.2f}")
print("-" * 100)
# Calculate totals
total_usage = {
'input_tokens': main_usage['input_tokens'],
'output_tokens': main_usage['output_tokens'],
'cache_creation': main_usage['cache_creation'],
'cache_read': main_usage['cache_read'],
'messages': main_usage['messages']
}
for usage in subagent_usage.values():
total_usage['input_tokens'] += usage['input_tokens']
total_usage['output_tokens'] += usage['output_tokens']
total_usage['cache_creation'] += usage['cache_creation']
total_usage['cache_read'] += usage['cache_read']
total_usage['messages'] += usage['messages']
total_input = total_usage['input_tokens'] + total_usage['cache_creation'] + total_usage['cache_read']
total_tokens = total_input + total_usage['output_tokens']
total_cost = calculate_cost(total_usage)
print()
print("TOTALS:")
print(f" Total messages: {format_tokens(total_usage['messages'])}")
print(f" Input tokens: {format_tokens(total_usage['input_tokens'])}")
print(f" Output tokens: {format_tokens(total_usage['output_tokens'])}")
print(f" Cache creation tokens: {format_tokens(total_usage['cache_creation'])}")
print(f" Cache read tokens: {format_tokens(total_usage['cache_read'])}")
print()
print(f" Total input (incl cache): {format_tokens(total_input)}")
print(f" Total tokens: {format_tokens(total_tokens)}")
print()
print(f" Estimated cost: ${total_cost:.2f}")
print(" (at $3/$15 per M tokens for input/output)")
print()
print("=" * 100)
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,187 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Test runner for Claude Code skills
# Tests skills by invoking Claude Code CLI and verifying behavior
set -euo pipefail
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
cd "$SCRIPT_DIR"
echo "========================================"
echo " Claude Code Skills Test Suite"
echo "========================================"
echo ""
echo "Repository: $(cd ../.. && pwd)"
echo "Test time: $(date)"
echo "Claude version: $(claude --version 2>/dev/null || echo 'not found')"
echo ""
# Check if Claude Code is available
if ! command -v claude &> /dev/null; then
echo "ERROR: Claude Code CLI not found"
echo "Install Claude Code first: https://code.claude.com"
exit 1
fi
# Parse command line arguments
VERBOSE=false
SPECIFIC_TEST=""
TIMEOUT=300 # Default 5 minute timeout per test
RUN_INTEGRATION=false
while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]; do
case $1 in
--verbose|-v)
VERBOSE=true
shift
;;
--test|-t)
SPECIFIC_TEST="$2"
shift 2
;;
--timeout)
TIMEOUT="$2"
shift 2
;;
--integration|-i)
RUN_INTEGRATION=true
shift
;;
--help|-h)
echo "Usage: $0 [options]"
echo ""
echo "Options:"
echo " --verbose, -v Show verbose output"
echo " --test, -t NAME Run only the specified test"
echo " --timeout SECONDS Set timeout per test (default: 300)"
echo " --integration, -i Run integration tests (slow, 10-30 min)"
echo " --help, -h Show this help"
echo ""
echo "Tests:"
echo " test-subagent-driven-development.sh Test skill loading and requirements"
echo ""
echo "Integration Tests (use --integration):"
echo " test-subagent-driven-development-integration.sh Full workflow execution"
exit 0
;;
*)
echo "Unknown option: $1"
echo "Use --help for usage information"
exit 1
;;
esac
done
# List of skill tests to run (fast unit tests)
tests=(
"test-subagent-driven-development.sh"
)
# Integration tests (slow, full execution)
integration_tests=(
"test-subagent-driven-development-integration.sh"
)
# Add integration tests if requested
if [ "$RUN_INTEGRATION" = true ]; then
tests+=("${integration_tests[@]}")
fi
# Filter to specific test if requested
if [ -n "$SPECIFIC_TEST" ]; then
tests=("$SPECIFIC_TEST")
fi
# Track results
passed=0
failed=0
skipped=0
# Run each test
for test in "${tests[@]}"; do
echo "----------------------------------------"
echo "Running: $test"
echo "----------------------------------------"
test_path="$SCRIPT_DIR/$test"
if [ ! -f "$test_path" ]; then
echo " [SKIP] Test file not found: $test"
skipped=$((skipped + 1))
continue
fi
if [ ! -x "$test_path" ]; then
echo " Making $test executable..."
chmod +x "$test_path"
fi
start_time=$(date +%s)
if [ "$VERBOSE" = true ]; then
if timeout "$TIMEOUT" bash "$test_path"; then
end_time=$(date +%s)
duration=$((end_time - start_time))
echo ""
echo " [PASS] $test (${duration}s)"
passed=$((passed + 1))
else
exit_code=$?
end_time=$(date +%s)
duration=$((end_time - start_time))
echo ""
if [ $exit_code -eq 124 ]; then
echo " [FAIL] $test (timeout after ${TIMEOUT}s)"
else
echo " [FAIL] $test (${duration}s)"
fi
failed=$((failed + 1))
fi
else
# Capture output for non-verbose mode
if output=$(timeout "$TIMEOUT" bash "$test_path" 2>&1); then
end_time=$(date +%s)
duration=$((end_time - start_time))
echo " [PASS] (${duration}s)"
passed=$((passed + 1))
else
exit_code=$?
end_time=$(date +%s)
duration=$((end_time - start_time))
if [ $exit_code -eq 124 ]; then
echo " [FAIL] (timeout after ${TIMEOUT}s)"
else
echo " [FAIL] (${duration}s)"
fi
echo ""
echo " Output:"
echo "$output" | sed 's/^/ /'
failed=$((failed + 1))
fi
fi
echo ""
done
# Print summary
echo "========================================"
echo " Test Results Summary"
echo "========================================"
echo ""
echo " Passed: $passed"
echo " Failed: $failed"
echo " Skipped: $skipped"
echo ""
if [ "$RUN_INTEGRATION" = false ] && [ ${#integration_tests[@]} -gt 0 ]; then
echo "Note: Integration tests were not run (they take 10-30 minutes)."
echo "Use --integration flag to run full workflow execution tests."
echo ""
fi
if [ $failed -gt 0 ]; then
echo "STATUS: FAILED"
exit 1
else
echo "STATUS: PASSED"
exit 0
fi

202
tests/claude-code/test-helpers.sh Executable file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Helper functions for Claude Code skill tests
# Run Claude Code with a prompt and capture output
# Usage: run_claude "prompt text" [timeout_seconds] [allowed_tools]
run_claude() {
local prompt="$1"
local timeout="${2:-60}"
local allowed_tools="${3:-}"
local output_file=$(mktemp)
# Build command
local cmd="claude -p \"$prompt\""
if [ -n "$allowed_tools" ]; then
cmd="$cmd --allowed-tools=$allowed_tools"
fi
# Run Claude in headless mode with timeout
if timeout "$timeout" bash -c "$cmd" > "$output_file" 2>&1; then
cat "$output_file"
rm -f "$output_file"
return 0
else
local exit_code=$?
cat "$output_file" >&2
rm -f "$output_file"
return $exit_code
fi
}
# Check if output contains a pattern
# Usage: assert_contains "output" "pattern" "test name"
assert_contains() {
local output="$1"
local pattern="$2"
local test_name="${3:-test}"
if echo "$output" | grep -q "$pattern"; then
echo " [PASS] $test_name"
return 0
else
echo " [FAIL] $test_name"
echo " Expected to find: $pattern"
echo " In output:"
echo "$output" | sed 's/^/ /'
return 1
fi
}
# Check if output does NOT contain a pattern
# Usage: assert_not_contains "output" "pattern" "test name"
assert_not_contains() {
local output="$1"
local pattern="$2"
local test_name="${3:-test}"
if echo "$output" | grep -q "$pattern"; then
echo " [FAIL] $test_name"
echo " Did not expect to find: $pattern"
echo " In output:"
echo "$output" | sed 's/^/ /'
return 1
else
echo " [PASS] $test_name"
return 0
fi
}
# Check if output matches a count
# Usage: assert_count "output" "pattern" expected_count "test name"
assert_count() {
local output="$1"
local pattern="$2"
local expected="$3"
local test_name="${4:-test}"
local actual=$(echo "$output" | grep -c "$pattern" || echo "0")
if [ "$actual" -eq "$expected" ]; then
echo " [PASS] $test_name (found $actual instances)"
return 0
else
echo " [FAIL] $test_name"
echo " Expected $expected instances of: $pattern"
echo " Found $actual instances"
echo " In output:"
echo "$output" | sed 's/^/ /'
return 1
fi
}
# Check if pattern A appears before pattern B
# Usage: assert_order "output" "pattern_a" "pattern_b" "test name"
assert_order() {
local output="$1"
local pattern_a="$2"
local pattern_b="$3"
local test_name="${4:-test}"
# Get line numbers where patterns appear
local line_a=$(echo "$output" | grep -n "$pattern_a" | head -1 | cut -d: -f1)
local line_b=$(echo "$output" | grep -n "$pattern_b" | head -1 | cut -d: -f1)
if [ -z "$line_a" ]; then
echo " [FAIL] $test_name: pattern A not found: $pattern_a"
return 1
fi
if [ -z "$line_b" ]; then
echo " [FAIL] $test_name: pattern B not found: $pattern_b"
return 1
fi
if [ "$line_a" -lt "$line_b" ]; then
echo " [PASS] $test_name (A at line $line_a, B at line $line_b)"
return 0
else
echo " [FAIL] $test_name"
echo " Expected '$pattern_a' before '$pattern_b'"
echo " But found A at line $line_a, B at line $line_b"
return 1
fi
}
# Create a temporary test project directory
# Usage: test_project=$(create_test_project)
create_test_project() {
local test_dir=$(mktemp -d)
echo "$test_dir"
}
# Cleanup test project
# Usage: cleanup_test_project "$test_dir"
cleanup_test_project() {
local test_dir="$1"
if [ -d "$test_dir" ]; then
rm -rf "$test_dir"
fi
}
# Create a simple plan file for testing
# Usage: create_test_plan "$project_dir" "$plan_name"
create_test_plan() {
local project_dir="$1"
local plan_name="${2:-test-plan}"
local plan_file="$project_dir/docs/plans/$plan_name.md"
mkdir -p "$(dirname "$plan_file")"
cat > "$plan_file" <<'EOF'
# Test Implementation Plan
## Task 1: Create Hello Function
Create a simple hello function that returns "Hello, World!".
**File:** `src/hello.js`
**Implementation:**
```javascript
export function hello() {
return "Hello, World!";
}
```
**Tests:** Write a test that verifies the function returns the expected string.
**Verification:** `npm test`
## Task 2: Create Goodbye Function
Create a goodbye function that takes a name and returns a goodbye message.
**File:** `src/goodbye.js`
**Implementation:**
```javascript
export function goodbye(name) {
return `Goodbye, ${name}!`;
}
```
**Tests:** Write tests for:
- Default name
- Custom name
- Edge cases (empty string, null)
**Verification:** `npm test`
EOF
echo "$plan_file"
}
# Export functions for use in tests
export -f run_claude
export -f assert_contains
export -f assert_not_contains
export -f assert_count
export -f assert_order
export -f create_test_project
export -f cleanup_test_project
export -f create_test_plan

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,314 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Integration Test: subagent-driven-development workflow
# Actually executes a plan and verifies the new workflow behaviors
set -euo pipefail
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
source "$SCRIPT_DIR/test-helpers.sh"
echo "========================================"
echo " Integration Test: subagent-driven-development"
echo "========================================"
echo ""
echo "This test executes a real plan using the skill and verifies:"
echo " 1. Plan is read once (not per task)"
echo " 2. Full task text provided to subagents"
echo " 3. Subagents perform self-review"
echo " 4. Spec compliance review before code quality"
echo " 5. Review loops when issues found"
echo " 6. Spec reviewer reads code independently"
echo ""
echo "WARNING: This test may take 10-30 minutes to complete."
echo ""
# Create test project
TEST_PROJECT=$(create_test_project)
echo "Test project: $TEST_PROJECT"
# Trap to cleanup
trap "cleanup_test_project $TEST_PROJECT" EXIT
# Set up minimal Node.js project
cd "$TEST_PROJECT"
cat > package.json <<'EOF'
{
"name": "test-project",
"version": "1.0.0",
"type": "module",
"scripts": {
"test": "node --test"
}
}
EOF
mkdir -p src test docs/plans
# Create a simple implementation plan
cat > docs/plans/implementation-plan.md <<'EOF'
# Test Implementation Plan
This is a minimal plan to test the subagent-driven-development workflow.
## Task 1: Create Add Function
Create a function that adds two numbers.
**File:** `src/math.js`
**Requirements:**
- Function named `add`
- Takes two parameters: `a` and `b`
- Returns the sum of `a` and `b`
- Export the function
**Implementation:**
```javascript
export function add(a, b) {
return a + b;
}
```
**Tests:** Create `test/math.test.js` that verifies:
- `add(2, 3)` returns `5`
- `add(0, 0)` returns `0`
- `add(-1, 1)` returns `0`
**Verification:** `npm test`
## Task 2: Create Multiply Function
Create a function that multiplies two numbers.
**File:** `src/math.js` (add to existing file)
**Requirements:**
- Function named `multiply`
- Takes two parameters: `a` and `b`
- Returns the product of `a` and `b`
- Export the function
- DO NOT add any extra features (like power, divide, etc.)
**Implementation:**
```javascript
export function multiply(a, b) {
return a * b;
}
```
**Tests:** Add to `test/math.test.js`:
- `multiply(2, 3)` returns `6`
- `multiply(0, 5)` returns `0`
- `multiply(-2, 3)` returns `-6`
**Verification:** `npm test`
EOF
# Initialize git repo
git init --quiet
git config user.email "test@test.com"
git config user.name "Test User"
git add .
git commit -m "Initial commit" --quiet
echo ""
echo "Project setup complete. Starting execution..."
echo ""
# Run Claude with subagent-driven-development
# Capture full output to analyze
OUTPUT_FILE="$TEST_PROJECT/claude-output.txt"
# Create prompt file
cat > "$TEST_PROJECT/prompt.txt" <<'EOF'
I want you to execute the implementation plan at docs/plans/implementation-plan.md using the subagent-driven-development skill.
IMPORTANT: Follow the skill exactly. I will be verifying that you:
1. Read the plan once at the beginning
2. Provide full task text to subagents (don't make them read files)
3. Ensure subagents do self-review before reporting
4. Run spec compliance review before code quality review
5. Use review loops when issues are found
Begin now. Execute the plan.
EOF
# Note: We use a longer timeout since this is integration testing
# Use --allowed-tools to enable tool usage in headless mode
# IMPORTANT: Run from superpowers directory so local dev skills are available
PROMPT="Change to directory $TEST_PROJECT and then execute the implementation plan at docs/plans/implementation-plan.md using the subagent-driven-development skill.
IMPORTANT: Follow the skill exactly. I will be verifying that you:
1. Read the plan once at the beginning
2. Provide full task text to subagents (don't make them read files)
3. Ensure subagents do self-review before reporting
4. Run spec compliance review before code quality review
5. Use review loops when issues are found
Begin now. Execute the plan."
echo "Running Claude (output will be shown below and saved to $OUTPUT_FILE)..."
echo "================================================================================"
cd "$SCRIPT_DIR/../.." && timeout 1800 claude -p "$PROMPT" --allowed-tools=all --add-dir "$TEST_PROJECT" --permission-mode bypassPermissions 2>&1 | tee "$OUTPUT_FILE" || {
echo ""
echo "================================================================================"
echo "EXECUTION FAILED (exit code: $?)"
exit 1
}
echo "================================================================================"
echo ""
echo "Execution complete. Analyzing results..."
echo ""
# Find the session transcript
# Session files are in ~/.claude/projects/-<working-dir>/<session-id>.jsonl
WORKING_DIR_ESCAPED=$(echo "$SCRIPT_DIR/../.." | sed 's/\//-/g' | sed 's/^-//')
SESSION_DIR="$HOME/.claude/projects/$WORKING_DIR_ESCAPED"
# Find the most recent session file (created during this test run)
SESSION_FILE=$(find "$SESSION_DIR" -name "*.jsonl" -type f -mmin -60 2>/dev/null | sort -r | head -1)
if [ -z "$SESSION_FILE" ]; then
echo "ERROR: Could not find session transcript file"
echo "Looked in: $SESSION_DIR"
exit 1
fi
echo "Analyzing session transcript: $(basename "$SESSION_FILE")"
echo ""
# Verification tests
FAILED=0
echo "=== Verification Tests ==="
echo ""
# Test 1: Skill was invoked
echo "Test 1: Skill tool invoked..."
if grep -q '"name":"Skill".*"skill":"superpowers:subagent-driven-development"' "$SESSION_FILE"; then
echo " [PASS] subagent-driven-development skill was invoked"
else
echo " [FAIL] Skill was not invoked"
FAILED=$((FAILED + 1))
fi
echo ""
# Test 2: Subagents were used (Task tool)
echo "Test 2: Subagents dispatched..."
task_count=$(grep -c '"name":"Task"' "$SESSION_FILE" || echo "0")
if [ "$task_count" -ge 2 ]; then
echo " [PASS] $task_count subagents dispatched"
else
echo " [FAIL] Only $task_count subagent(s) dispatched (expected >= 2)"
FAILED=$((FAILED + 1))
fi
echo ""
# Test 3: TodoWrite was used for tracking
echo "Test 3: Task tracking..."
todo_count=$(grep -c '"name":"TodoWrite"' "$SESSION_FILE" || echo "0")
if [ "$todo_count" -ge 1 ]; then
echo " [PASS] TodoWrite used $todo_count time(s) for task tracking"
else
echo " [FAIL] TodoWrite not used"
FAILED=$((FAILED + 1))
fi
echo ""
# Test 6: Implementation actually works
echo "Test 6: Implementation verification..."
if [ -f "$TEST_PROJECT/src/math.js" ]; then
echo " [PASS] src/math.js created"
if grep -q "export function add" "$TEST_PROJECT/src/math.js"; then
echo " [PASS] add function exists"
else
echo " [FAIL] add function missing"
FAILED=$((FAILED + 1))
fi
if grep -q "export function multiply" "$TEST_PROJECT/src/math.js"; then
echo " [PASS] multiply function exists"
else
echo " [FAIL] multiply function missing"
FAILED=$((FAILED + 1))
fi
else
echo " [FAIL] src/math.js not created"
FAILED=$((FAILED + 1))
fi
if [ -f "$TEST_PROJECT/test/math.test.js" ]; then
echo " [PASS] test/math.test.js created"
else
echo " [FAIL] test/math.test.js not created"
FAILED=$((FAILED + 1))
fi
# Try running tests
if cd "$TEST_PROJECT" && npm test > test-output.txt 2>&1; then
echo " [PASS] Tests pass"
else
echo " [FAIL] Tests failed"
cat test-output.txt
FAILED=$((FAILED + 1))
fi
echo ""
# Test 7: Git commits show proper workflow
echo "Test 7: Git commit history..."
commit_count=$(git -C "$TEST_PROJECT" log --oneline | wc -l)
if [ "$commit_count" -gt 2 ]; then # Initial + at least 2 task commits
echo " [PASS] Multiple commits created ($commit_count total)"
else
echo " [FAIL] Too few commits ($commit_count, expected >2)"
FAILED=$((FAILED + 1))
fi
echo ""
# Test 8: Check for extra features (spec compliance should catch)
echo "Test 8: No extra features added (spec compliance)..."
if grep -q "export function divide\|export function power\|export function subtract" "$TEST_PROJECT/src/math.js" 2>/dev/null; then
echo " [WARN] Extra features found (spec review should have caught this)"
# Not failing on this as it tests reviewer effectiveness
else
echo " [PASS] No extra features added"
fi
echo ""
# Token Usage Analysis
echo "========================================="
echo " Token Usage Analysis"
echo "========================================="
echo ""
python3 "$SCRIPT_DIR/analyze-token-usage.py" "$SESSION_FILE"
echo ""
# Summary
echo "========================================"
echo " Test Summary"
echo "========================================"
echo ""
if [ $FAILED -eq 0 ]; then
echo "STATUS: PASSED"
echo "All verification tests passed!"
echo ""
echo "The subagent-driven-development skill correctly:"
echo " ✓ Reads plan once at start"
echo " ✓ Provides full task text to subagents"
echo " ✓ Enforces self-review"
echo " ✓ Runs spec compliance before code quality"
echo " ✓ Spec reviewer verifies independently"
echo " ✓ Produces working implementation"
exit 0
else
echo "STATUS: FAILED"
echo "Failed $FAILED verification tests"
echo ""
echo "Output saved to: $OUTPUT_FILE"
echo ""
echo "Review the output to see what went wrong."
exit 1
fi

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Test: subagent-driven-development skill
# Verifies that the skill is loaded and follows correct workflow
set -euo pipefail
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
source "$SCRIPT_DIR/test-helpers.sh"
echo "=== Test: subagent-driven-development skill ==="
echo ""
# Test 1: Verify skill can be loaded
echo "Test 1: Skill loading..."
output=$(run_claude "What is the subagent-driven-development skill? Describe its key steps briefly." 30)
if assert_contains "$output" "subagent-driven-development" "Skill is recognized"; then
: # pass
else
exit 1
fi
if assert_contains "$output" "Load Plan\|read.*plan\|extract.*tasks" "Mentions loading plan"; then
: # pass
else
exit 1
fi
echo ""
# Test 2: Verify skill describes correct workflow order
echo "Test 2: Workflow ordering..."
output=$(run_claude "In the subagent-driven-development skill, what comes first: spec compliance review or code quality review? Be specific about the order." 30)
if assert_order "$output" "spec.*compliance" "code.*quality" "Spec compliance before code quality"; then
: # pass
else
exit 1
fi
echo ""
# Test 3: Verify self-review is mentioned
echo "Test 3: Self-review requirement..."
output=$(run_claude "Does the subagent-driven-development skill require implementers to do self-review? What should they check?" 30)
if assert_contains "$output" "self-review\|self review" "Mentions self-review"; then
: # pass
else
exit 1
fi
if assert_contains "$output" "completeness\|Completeness" "Checks completeness"; then
: # pass
else
exit 1
fi
echo ""
# Test 4: Verify plan is read once
echo "Test 4: Plan reading efficiency..."
output=$(run_claude "In subagent-driven-development, how many times should the controller read the plan file? When does this happen?" 30)
if assert_contains "$output" "once\|one time\|single" "Read plan once"; then
: # pass
else
exit 1
fi
if assert_contains "$output" "Step 1\|beginning\|start\|Load Plan" "Read at beginning"; then
: # pass
else
exit 1
fi
echo ""
# Test 5: Verify spec compliance reviewer is skeptical
echo "Test 5: Spec compliance reviewer mindset..."
output=$(run_claude "What is the spec compliance reviewer's attitude toward the implementer's report in subagent-driven-development?" 30)
if assert_contains "$output" "not trust\|don't trust\|skeptical\|verify.*independently\|suspiciously" "Reviewer is skeptical"; then
: # pass
else
exit 1
fi
if assert_contains "$output" "read.*code\|inspect.*code\|verify.*code" "Reviewer reads code"; then
: # pass
else
exit 1
fi
echo ""
# Test 6: Verify review loops
echo "Test 6: Review loop requirements..."
output=$(run_claude "In subagent-driven-development, what happens if a reviewer finds issues? Is it a one-time review or a loop?" 30)
if assert_contains "$output" "loop\|again\|repeat\|until.*approved\|until.*compliant" "Review loops mentioned"; then
: # pass
else
exit 1
fi
if assert_contains "$output" "implementer.*fix\|fix.*issues" "Implementer fixes issues"; then
: # pass
else
exit 1
fi
echo ""
# Test 7: Verify full task text is provided
echo "Test 7: Task context provision..."
output=$(run_claude "In subagent-driven-development, how does the controller provide task information to the implementer subagent? Does it make them read a file or provide it directly?" 30)
if assert_contains "$output" "provide.*directly\|full.*text\|paste\|include.*prompt" "Provides text directly"; then
: # pass
else
exit 1
fi
if assert_not_contains "$output" "read.*file\|open.*file" "Doesn't make subagent read file"; then
: # pass
else
exit 1
fi
echo ""
echo "=== All subagent-driven-development skill tests passed ==="

165
tests/opencode/run-tests.sh Executable file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,165 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Main test runner for OpenCode plugin test suite
# Runs all tests and reports results
set -euo pipefail
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
cd "$SCRIPT_DIR"
echo "========================================"
echo " OpenCode Plugin Test Suite"
echo "========================================"
echo ""
echo "Repository: $(cd ../.. && pwd)"
echo "Test time: $(date)"
echo ""
# Parse command line arguments
RUN_INTEGRATION=false
VERBOSE=false
SPECIFIC_TEST=""
while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]; do
case $1 in
--integration|-i)
RUN_INTEGRATION=true
shift
;;
--verbose|-v)
VERBOSE=true
shift
;;
--test|-t)
SPECIFIC_TEST="$2"
shift 2
;;
--help|-h)
echo "Usage: $0 [options]"
echo ""
echo "Options:"
echo " --integration, -i Run integration tests (requires OpenCode)"
echo " --verbose, -v Show verbose output"
echo " --test, -t NAME Run only the specified test"
echo " --help, -h Show this help"
echo ""
echo "Tests:"
echo " test-plugin-loading.sh Verify plugin installation and structure"
echo " test-skills-core.sh Test skills-core.js library functions"
echo " test-tools.sh Test use_skill and find_skills tools (integration)"
echo " test-priority.sh Test skill priority resolution (integration)"
exit 0
;;
*)
echo "Unknown option: $1"
echo "Use --help for usage information"
exit 1
;;
esac
done
# List of tests to run (no external dependencies)
tests=(
"test-plugin-loading.sh"
"test-skills-core.sh"
)
# Integration tests (require OpenCode)
integration_tests=(
"test-tools.sh"
"test-priority.sh"
)
# Add integration tests if requested
if [ "$RUN_INTEGRATION" = true ]; then
tests+=("${integration_tests[@]}")
fi
# Filter to specific test if requested
if [ -n "$SPECIFIC_TEST" ]; then
tests=("$SPECIFIC_TEST")
fi
# Track results
passed=0
failed=0
skipped=0
# Run each test
for test in "${tests[@]}"; do
echo "----------------------------------------"
echo "Running: $test"
echo "----------------------------------------"
test_path="$SCRIPT_DIR/$test"
if [ ! -f "$test_path" ]; then
echo " [SKIP] Test file not found: $test"
skipped=$((skipped + 1))
continue
fi
if [ ! -x "$test_path" ]; then
echo " Making $test executable..."
chmod +x "$test_path"
fi
start_time=$(date +%s)
if [ "$VERBOSE" = true ]; then
if bash "$test_path"; then
end_time=$(date +%s)
duration=$((end_time - start_time))
echo ""
echo " [PASS] $test (${duration}s)"
passed=$((passed + 1))
else
end_time=$(date +%s)
duration=$((end_time - start_time))
echo ""
echo " [FAIL] $test (${duration}s)"
failed=$((failed + 1))
fi
else
# Capture output for non-verbose mode
if output=$(bash "$test_path" 2>&1); then
end_time=$(date +%s)
duration=$((end_time - start_time))
echo " [PASS] (${duration}s)"
passed=$((passed + 1))
else
end_time=$(date +%s)
duration=$((end_time - start_time))
echo " [FAIL] (${duration}s)"
echo ""
echo " Output:"
echo "$output" | sed 's/^/ /'
failed=$((failed + 1))
fi
fi
echo ""
done
# Print summary
echo "========================================"
echo " Test Results Summary"
echo "========================================"
echo ""
echo " Passed: $passed"
echo " Failed: $failed"
echo " Skipped: $skipped"
echo ""
if [ "$RUN_INTEGRATION" = false ] && [ ${#integration_tests[@]} -gt 0 ]; then
echo "Note: Integration tests were not run."
echo "Use --integration flag to run tests that require OpenCode."
echo ""
fi
if [ $failed -gt 0 ]; then
echo "STATUS: FAILED"
exit 1
else
echo "STATUS: PASSED"
exit 0
fi

73
tests/opencode/setup.sh Executable file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Setup script for OpenCode plugin tests
# Creates an isolated test environment with proper plugin installation
set -euo pipefail
# Get the repository root (two levels up from tests/opencode/)
REPO_ROOT="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")/../.." && pwd)"
# Create temp home directory for isolation
export TEST_HOME=$(mktemp -d)
export HOME="$TEST_HOME"
export XDG_CONFIG_HOME="$TEST_HOME/.config"
export OPENCODE_CONFIG_DIR="$TEST_HOME/.config/opencode"
# Install plugin to test location
mkdir -p "$HOME/.config/opencode/superpowers"
cp -r "$REPO_ROOT/lib" "$HOME/.config/opencode/superpowers/"
cp -r "$REPO_ROOT/skills" "$HOME/.config/opencode/superpowers/"
# Copy plugin directory
mkdir -p "$HOME/.config/opencode/superpowers/.opencode/plugin"
cp "$REPO_ROOT/.opencode/plugin/superpowers.js" "$HOME/.config/opencode/superpowers/.opencode/plugin/"
# Register plugin via symlink
mkdir -p "$HOME/.config/opencode/plugin"
ln -sf "$HOME/.config/opencode/superpowers/.opencode/plugin/superpowers.js" \
"$HOME/.config/opencode/plugin/superpowers.js"
# Create test skills in different locations for testing
# Personal test skill
mkdir -p "$HOME/.config/opencode/skills/personal-test"
cat > "$HOME/.config/opencode/skills/personal-test/SKILL.md" <<'EOF'
---
name: personal-test
description: Test personal skill for verification
---
# Personal Test Skill
This is a personal skill used for testing.
PERSONAL_SKILL_MARKER_12345
EOF
# Create a project directory for project-level skill tests
mkdir -p "$TEST_HOME/test-project/.opencode/skills/project-test"
cat > "$TEST_HOME/test-project/.opencode/skills/project-test/SKILL.md" <<'EOF'
---
name: project-test
description: Test project skill for verification
---
# Project Test Skill
This is a project skill used for testing.
PROJECT_SKILL_MARKER_67890
EOF
echo "Setup complete: $TEST_HOME"
echo "Plugin installed to: $HOME/.config/opencode/superpowers/.opencode/plugin/superpowers.js"
echo "Plugin registered at: $HOME/.config/opencode/plugin/superpowers.js"
echo "Test project at: $TEST_HOME/test-project"
# Helper function for cleanup (call from tests or trap)
cleanup_test_env() {
if [ -n "${TEST_HOME:-}" ] && [ -d "$TEST_HOME" ]; then
rm -rf "$TEST_HOME"
fi
}
# Export for use in tests
export -f cleanup_test_env
export REPO_ROOT

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Test: Plugin Loading
# Verifies that the superpowers plugin loads correctly in OpenCode
set -euo pipefail
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
echo "=== Test: Plugin Loading ==="
# Source setup to create isolated environment
source "$SCRIPT_DIR/setup.sh"
# Trap to cleanup on exit
trap cleanup_test_env EXIT
# Test 1: Verify plugin file exists and is registered
echo "Test 1: Checking plugin registration..."
if [ -L "$HOME/.config/opencode/plugin/superpowers.js" ]; then
echo " [PASS] Plugin symlink exists"
else
echo " [FAIL] Plugin symlink not found at $HOME/.config/opencode/plugin/superpowers.js"
exit 1
fi
# Verify symlink target exists
if [ -f "$(readlink -f "$HOME/.config/opencode/plugin/superpowers.js")" ]; then
echo " [PASS] Plugin symlink target exists"
else
echo " [FAIL] Plugin symlink target does not exist"
exit 1
fi
# Test 2: Verify lib/skills-core.js is in place
echo "Test 2: Checking skills-core.js..."
if [ -f "$HOME/.config/opencode/superpowers/lib/skills-core.js" ]; then
echo " [PASS] skills-core.js exists"
else
echo " [FAIL] skills-core.js not found"
exit 1
fi
# Test 3: Verify skills directory is populated
echo "Test 3: Checking skills directory..."
skill_count=$(find "$HOME/.config/opencode/superpowers/skills" -name "SKILL.md" | wc -l)
if [ "$skill_count" -gt 0 ]; then
echo " [PASS] Found $skill_count skills installed"
else
echo " [FAIL] No skills found in installed location"
exit 1
fi
# Test 4: Check using-superpowers skill exists (critical for bootstrap)
echo "Test 4: Checking using-superpowers skill (required for bootstrap)..."
if [ -f "$HOME/.config/opencode/superpowers/skills/using-superpowers/SKILL.md" ]; then
echo " [PASS] using-superpowers skill exists"
else
echo " [FAIL] using-superpowers skill not found (required for bootstrap)"
exit 1
fi
# Test 5: Verify plugin JavaScript syntax (basic check)
echo "Test 5: Checking plugin JavaScript syntax..."
plugin_file="$HOME/.config/opencode/superpowers/.opencode/plugin/superpowers.js"
if node --check "$plugin_file" 2>/dev/null; then
echo " [PASS] Plugin JavaScript syntax is valid"
else
echo " [FAIL] Plugin has JavaScript syntax errors"
exit 1
fi
# Test 6: Verify personal test skill was created
echo "Test 6: Checking test fixtures..."
if [ -f "$HOME/.config/opencode/skills/personal-test/SKILL.md" ]; then
echo " [PASS] Personal test skill fixture created"
else
echo " [FAIL] Personal test skill fixture not found"
exit 1
fi
echo ""
echo "=== All plugin loading tests passed ==="

198
tests/opencode/test-priority.sh Executable file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Test: Skill Priority Resolution
# Verifies that skills are resolved with correct priority: project > personal > superpowers
# NOTE: These tests require OpenCode to be installed and configured
set -euo pipefail
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
echo "=== Test: Skill Priority Resolution ==="
# Source setup to create isolated environment
source "$SCRIPT_DIR/setup.sh"
# Trap to cleanup on exit
trap cleanup_test_env EXIT
# Create same skill "priority-test" in all three locations with different markers
echo "Setting up priority test fixtures..."
# 1. Create in superpowers location (lowest priority)
mkdir -p "$HOME/.config/opencode/superpowers/skills/priority-test"
cat > "$HOME/.config/opencode/superpowers/skills/priority-test/SKILL.md" <<'EOF'
---
name: priority-test
description: Superpowers version of priority test skill
---
# Priority Test Skill (Superpowers Version)
This is the SUPERPOWERS version of the priority test skill.
PRIORITY_MARKER_SUPERPOWERS_VERSION
EOF
# 2. Create in personal location (medium priority)
mkdir -p "$HOME/.config/opencode/skills/priority-test"
cat > "$HOME/.config/opencode/skills/priority-test/SKILL.md" <<'EOF'
---
name: priority-test
description: Personal version of priority test skill
---
# Priority Test Skill (Personal Version)
This is the PERSONAL version of the priority test skill.
PRIORITY_MARKER_PERSONAL_VERSION
EOF
# 3. Create in project location (highest priority)
mkdir -p "$TEST_HOME/test-project/.opencode/skills/priority-test"
cat > "$TEST_HOME/test-project/.opencode/skills/priority-test/SKILL.md" <<'EOF'
---
name: priority-test
description: Project version of priority test skill
---
# Priority Test Skill (Project Version)
This is the PROJECT version of the priority test skill.
PRIORITY_MARKER_PROJECT_VERSION
EOF
echo " Created priority-test skill in all three locations"
# Test 1: Verify fixture setup
echo ""
echo "Test 1: Verifying test fixtures..."
if [ -f "$HOME/.config/opencode/superpowers/skills/priority-test/SKILL.md" ]; then
echo " [PASS] Superpowers version exists"
else
echo " [FAIL] Superpowers version missing"
exit 1
fi
if [ -f "$HOME/.config/opencode/skills/priority-test/SKILL.md" ]; then
echo " [PASS] Personal version exists"
else
echo " [FAIL] Personal version missing"
exit 1
fi
if [ -f "$TEST_HOME/test-project/.opencode/skills/priority-test/SKILL.md" ]; then
echo " [PASS] Project version exists"
else
echo " [FAIL] Project version missing"
exit 1
fi
# Check if opencode is available for integration tests
if ! command -v opencode &> /dev/null; then
echo ""
echo " [SKIP] OpenCode not installed - skipping integration tests"
echo " To run these tests, install OpenCode: https://opencode.ai"
echo ""
echo "=== Priority fixture tests passed (integration tests skipped) ==="
exit 0
fi
# Test 2: Test that personal overrides superpowers
echo ""
echo "Test 2: Testing personal > superpowers priority..."
echo " Running from outside project directory..."
# Run from HOME (not in project) - should get personal version
cd "$HOME"
output=$(timeout 60s opencode run --print-logs "Use the use_skill tool to load the priority-test skill. Show me the exact content including any PRIORITY_MARKER text." 2>&1) || {
exit_code=$?
if [ $exit_code -eq 124 ]; then
echo " [FAIL] OpenCode timed out after 60s"
exit 1
fi
}
if echo "$output" | grep -qi "PRIORITY_MARKER_PERSONAL_VERSION"; then
echo " [PASS] Personal version loaded (overrides superpowers)"
elif echo "$output" | grep -qi "PRIORITY_MARKER_SUPERPOWERS_VERSION"; then
echo " [FAIL] Superpowers version loaded instead of personal"
exit 1
else
echo " [WARN] Could not verify priority marker in output"
echo " Output snippet:"
echo "$output" | grep -i "priority\|personal\|superpowers" | head -10
fi
# Test 3: Test that project overrides both personal and superpowers
echo ""
echo "Test 3: Testing project > personal > superpowers priority..."
echo " Running from project directory..."
# Run from project directory - should get project version
cd "$TEST_HOME/test-project"
output=$(timeout 60s opencode run --print-logs "Use the use_skill tool to load the priority-test skill. Show me the exact content including any PRIORITY_MARKER text." 2>&1) || {
exit_code=$?
if [ $exit_code -eq 124 ]; then
echo " [FAIL] OpenCode timed out after 60s"
exit 1
fi
}
if echo "$output" | grep -qi "PRIORITY_MARKER_PROJECT_VERSION"; then
echo " [PASS] Project version loaded (highest priority)"
elif echo "$output" | grep -qi "PRIORITY_MARKER_PERSONAL_VERSION"; then
echo " [FAIL] Personal version loaded instead of project"
exit 1
elif echo "$output" | grep -qi "PRIORITY_MARKER_SUPERPOWERS_VERSION"; then
echo " [FAIL] Superpowers version loaded instead of project"
exit 1
else
echo " [WARN] Could not verify priority marker in output"
echo " Output snippet:"
echo "$output" | grep -i "priority\|project\|personal" | head -10
fi
# Test 4: Test explicit superpowers: prefix bypasses priority
echo ""
echo "Test 4: Testing superpowers: prefix forces superpowers version..."
cd "$TEST_HOME/test-project"
output=$(timeout 60s opencode run --print-logs "Use the use_skill tool to load superpowers:priority-test specifically. Show me the exact content including any PRIORITY_MARKER text." 2>&1) || {
exit_code=$?
if [ $exit_code -eq 124 ]; then
echo " [FAIL] OpenCode timed out after 60s"
exit 1
fi
}
if echo "$output" | grep -qi "PRIORITY_MARKER_SUPERPOWERS_VERSION"; then
echo " [PASS] superpowers: prefix correctly forces superpowers version"
elif echo "$output" | grep -qi "PRIORITY_MARKER_PROJECT_VERSION\|PRIORITY_MARKER_PERSONAL_VERSION"; then
echo " [FAIL] superpowers: prefix did not force superpowers version"
exit 1
else
echo " [WARN] Could not verify priority marker in output"
fi
# Test 5: Test explicit project: prefix
echo ""
echo "Test 5: Testing project: prefix forces project version..."
cd "$HOME" # Run from outside project but with project: prefix
output=$(timeout 60s opencode run --print-logs "Use the use_skill tool to load project:priority-test specifically. Show me the exact content." 2>&1) || {
exit_code=$?
if [ $exit_code -eq 124 ]; then
echo " [FAIL] OpenCode timed out after 60s"
exit 1
fi
}
# Note: This may fail since we're not in the project directory
# The project: prefix only works when in a project context
if echo "$output" | grep -qi "not found\|error"; then
echo " [PASS] project: prefix correctly fails when not in project context"
else
echo " [INFO] project: prefix behavior outside project context may vary"
fi
echo ""
echo "=== All priority tests passed ==="

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,440 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Test: Skills Core Library
# Tests the skills-core.js library functions directly via Node.js
# Does not require OpenCode - tests pure library functionality
set -euo pipefail
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
echo "=== Test: Skills Core Library ==="
# Source setup to create isolated environment
source "$SCRIPT_DIR/setup.sh"
# Trap to cleanup on exit
trap cleanup_test_env EXIT
# Test 1: Test extractFrontmatter function
echo "Test 1: Testing extractFrontmatter..."
# Create test file with frontmatter
test_skill_dir="$TEST_HOME/test-skill"
mkdir -p "$test_skill_dir"
cat > "$test_skill_dir/SKILL.md" <<'EOF'
---
name: test-skill
description: A test skill for unit testing
---
# Test Skill Content
This is the content.
EOF
# Run Node.js test using inline function (avoids ESM path resolution issues in test env)
result=$(node -e "
const path = require('path');
const fs = require('fs');
// Inline the extractFrontmatter function for testing
function extractFrontmatter(filePath) {
try {
const content = fs.readFileSync(filePath, 'utf8');
const lines = content.split('\n');
let inFrontmatter = false;
let name = '';
let description = '';
for (const line of lines) {
if (line.trim() === '---') {
if (inFrontmatter) break;
inFrontmatter = true;
continue;
}
if (inFrontmatter) {
const match = line.match(/^(\w+):\s*(.*)$/);
if (match) {
const [, key, value] = match;
if (key === 'name') name = value.trim();
if (key === 'description') description = value.trim();
}
}
}
return { name, description };
} catch (error) {
return { name: '', description: '' };
}
}
const result = extractFrontmatter('$TEST_HOME/test-skill/SKILL.md');
console.log(JSON.stringify(result));
" 2>&1)
if echo "$result" | grep -q '"name":"test-skill"'; then
echo " [PASS] extractFrontmatter parses name correctly"
else
echo " [FAIL] extractFrontmatter did not parse name"
echo " Result: $result"
exit 1
fi
if echo "$result" | grep -q '"description":"A test skill for unit testing"'; then
echo " [PASS] extractFrontmatter parses description correctly"
else
echo " [FAIL] extractFrontmatter did not parse description"
exit 1
fi
# Test 2: Test stripFrontmatter function
echo ""
echo "Test 2: Testing stripFrontmatter..."
result=$(node -e "
const fs = require('fs');
function stripFrontmatter(content) {
const lines = content.split('\n');
let inFrontmatter = false;
let frontmatterEnded = false;
const contentLines = [];
for (const line of lines) {
if (line.trim() === '---') {
if (inFrontmatter) {
frontmatterEnded = true;
continue;
}
inFrontmatter = true;
continue;
}
if (frontmatterEnded || !inFrontmatter) {
contentLines.push(line);
}
}
return contentLines.join('\n').trim();
}
const content = fs.readFileSync('$TEST_HOME/test-skill/SKILL.md', 'utf8');
const stripped = stripFrontmatter(content);
console.log(stripped);
" 2>&1)
if echo "$result" | grep -q "# Test Skill Content"; then
echo " [PASS] stripFrontmatter preserves content"
else
echo " [FAIL] stripFrontmatter did not preserve content"
echo " Result: $result"
exit 1
fi
if ! echo "$result" | grep -q "name: test-skill"; then
echo " [PASS] stripFrontmatter removes frontmatter"
else
echo " [FAIL] stripFrontmatter did not remove frontmatter"
exit 1
fi
# Test 3: Test findSkillsInDir function
echo ""
echo "Test 3: Testing findSkillsInDir..."
# Create multiple test skills
mkdir -p "$TEST_HOME/skills-dir/skill-a"
mkdir -p "$TEST_HOME/skills-dir/skill-b"
mkdir -p "$TEST_HOME/skills-dir/nested/skill-c"
cat > "$TEST_HOME/skills-dir/skill-a/SKILL.md" <<'EOF'
---
name: skill-a
description: First skill
---
# Skill A
EOF
cat > "$TEST_HOME/skills-dir/skill-b/SKILL.md" <<'EOF'
---
name: skill-b
description: Second skill
---
# Skill B
EOF
cat > "$TEST_HOME/skills-dir/nested/skill-c/SKILL.md" <<'EOF'
---
name: skill-c
description: Nested skill
---
# Skill C
EOF
result=$(node -e "
const fs = require('fs');
const path = require('path');
function extractFrontmatter(filePath) {
try {
const content = fs.readFileSync(filePath, 'utf8');
const lines = content.split('\n');
let inFrontmatter = false;
let name = '';
let description = '';
for (const line of lines) {
if (line.trim() === '---') {
if (inFrontmatter) break;
inFrontmatter = true;
continue;
}
if (inFrontmatter) {
const match = line.match(/^(\w+):\s*(.*)$/);
if (match) {
const [, key, value] = match;
if (key === 'name') name = value.trim();
if (key === 'description') description = value.trim();
}
}
}
return { name, description };
} catch (error) {
return { name: '', description: '' };
}
}
function findSkillsInDir(dir, sourceType, maxDepth = 3) {
const skills = [];
if (!fs.existsSync(dir)) return skills;
function recurse(currentDir, depth) {
if (depth > maxDepth) return;
const entries = fs.readdirSync(currentDir, { withFileTypes: true });
for (const entry of entries) {
const fullPath = path.join(currentDir, entry.name);
if (entry.isDirectory()) {
const skillFile = path.join(fullPath, 'SKILL.md');
if (fs.existsSync(skillFile)) {
const { name, description } = extractFrontmatter(skillFile);
skills.push({
path: fullPath,
skillFile: skillFile,
name: name || entry.name,
description: description || '',
sourceType: sourceType
});
}
recurse(fullPath, depth + 1);
}
}
}
recurse(dir, 0);
return skills;
}
const skills = findSkillsInDir('$TEST_HOME/skills-dir', 'test', 3);
console.log(JSON.stringify(skills, null, 2));
" 2>&1)
skill_count=$(echo "$result" | grep -c '"name":' || echo "0")
if [ "$skill_count" -ge 3 ]; then
echo " [PASS] findSkillsInDir found all skills (found $skill_count)"
else
echo " [FAIL] findSkillsInDir did not find all skills (expected 3, found $skill_count)"
echo " Result: $result"
exit 1
fi
if echo "$result" | grep -q '"name": "skill-c"'; then
echo " [PASS] findSkillsInDir found nested skills"
else
echo " [FAIL] findSkillsInDir did not find nested skill"
exit 1
fi
# Test 4: Test resolveSkillPath function
echo ""
echo "Test 4: Testing resolveSkillPath..."
# Create skills in personal and superpowers locations for testing
mkdir -p "$TEST_HOME/personal-skills/shared-skill"
mkdir -p "$TEST_HOME/superpowers-skills/shared-skill"
mkdir -p "$TEST_HOME/superpowers-skills/unique-skill"
cat > "$TEST_HOME/personal-skills/shared-skill/SKILL.md" <<'EOF'
---
name: shared-skill
description: Personal version
---
# Personal Shared
EOF
cat > "$TEST_HOME/superpowers-skills/shared-skill/SKILL.md" <<'EOF'
---
name: shared-skill
description: Superpowers version
---
# Superpowers Shared
EOF
cat > "$TEST_HOME/superpowers-skills/unique-skill/SKILL.md" <<'EOF'
---
name: unique-skill
description: Only in superpowers
---
# Unique
EOF
result=$(node -e "
const fs = require('fs');
const path = require('path');
function resolveSkillPath(skillName, superpowersDir, personalDir) {
const forceSuperpowers = skillName.startsWith('superpowers:');
const actualSkillName = forceSuperpowers ? skillName.replace(/^superpowers:/, '') : skillName;
if (!forceSuperpowers && personalDir) {
const personalPath = path.join(personalDir, actualSkillName);
const personalSkillFile = path.join(personalPath, 'SKILL.md');
if (fs.existsSync(personalSkillFile)) {
return {
skillFile: personalSkillFile,
sourceType: 'personal',
skillPath: actualSkillName
};
}
}
if (superpowersDir) {
const superpowersPath = path.join(superpowersDir, actualSkillName);
const superpowersSkillFile = path.join(superpowersPath, 'SKILL.md');
if (fs.existsSync(superpowersSkillFile)) {
return {
skillFile: superpowersSkillFile,
sourceType: 'superpowers',
skillPath: actualSkillName
};
}
}
return null;
}
const superpowersDir = '$TEST_HOME/superpowers-skills';
const personalDir = '$TEST_HOME/personal-skills';
// Test 1: Shared skill should resolve to personal
const shared = resolveSkillPath('shared-skill', superpowersDir, personalDir);
console.log('SHARED:', JSON.stringify(shared));
// Test 2: superpowers: prefix should force superpowers
const forced = resolveSkillPath('superpowers:shared-skill', superpowersDir, personalDir);
console.log('FORCED:', JSON.stringify(forced));
// Test 3: Unique skill should resolve to superpowers
const unique = resolveSkillPath('unique-skill', superpowersDir, personalDir);
console.log('UNIQUE:', JSON.stringify(unique));
// Test 4: Non-existent skill
const notfound = resolveSkillPath('not-a-skill', superpowersDir, personalDir);
console.log('NOTFOUND:', JSON.stringify(notfound));
" 2>&1)
if echo "$result" | grep -q 'SHARED:.*"sourceType":"personal"'; then
echo " [PASS] Personal skills shadow superpowers skills"
else
echo " [FAIL] Personal skills not shadowing correctly"
echo " Result: $result"
exit 1
fi
if echo "$result" | grep -q 'FORCED:.*"sourceType":"superpowers"'; then
echo " [PASS] superpowers: prefix forces superpowers resolution"
else
echo " [FAIL] superpowers: prefix not working"
exit 1
fi
if echo "$result" | grep -q 'UNIQUE:.*"sourceType":"superpowers"'; then
echo " [PASS] Unique superpowers skills are found"
else
echo " [FAIL] Unique superpowers skills not found"
exit 1
fi
if echo "$result" | grep -q 'NOTFOUND: null'; then
echo " [PASS] Non-existent skills return null"
else
echo " [FAIL] Non-existent skills should return null"
exit 1
fi
# Test 5: Test checkForUpdates function
echo ""
echo "Test 5: Testing checkForUpdates..."
# Create a test git repo
mkdir -p "$TEST_HOME/test-repo"
cd "$TEST_HOME/test-repo"
git init --quiet
git config user.email "test@test.com"
git config user.name "Test"
echo "test" > file.txt
git add file.txt
git commit -m "initial" --quiet
cd "$SCRIPT_DIR"
# Test checkForUpdates on repo without remote (should return false, not error)
result=$(node -e "
const { execSync } = require('child_process');
function checkForUpdates(repoDir) {
try {
const output = execSync('git fetch origin && git status --porcelain=v1 --branch', {
cwd: repoDir,
timeout: 3000,
encoding: 'utf8',
stdio: 'pipe'
});
const statusLines = output.split('\n');
for (const line of statusLines) {
if (line.startsWith('## ') && line.includes('[behind ')) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
} catch (error) {
return false;
}
}
// Test 1: Repo without remote should return false (graceful error handling)
const result1 = checkForUpdates('$TEST_HOME/test-repo');
console.log('NO_REMOTE:', result1);
// Test 2: Non-existent directory should return false
const result2 = checkForUpdates('$TEST_HOME/nonexistent');
console.log('NONEXISTENT:', result2);
// Test 3: Non-git directory should return false
const result3 = checkForUpdates('$TEST_HOME');
console.log('NOT_GIT:', result3);
" 2>&1)
if echo "$result" | grep -q 'NO_REMOTE: false'; then
echo " [PASS] checkForUpdates handles repo without remote gracefully"
else
echo " [FAIL] checkForUpdates should return false for repo without remote"
echo " Result: $result"
exit 1
fi
if echo "$result" | grep -q 'NONEXISTENT: false'; then
echo " [PASS] checkForUpdates handles non-existent directory"
else
echo " [FAIL] checkForUpdates should return false for non-existent directory"
exit 1
fi
if echo "$result" | grep -q 'NOT_GIT: false'; then
echo " [PASS] checkForUpdates handles non-git directory"
else
echo " [FAIL] checkForUpdates should return false for non-git directory"
exit 1
fi
echo ""
echo "=== All skills-core library tests passed ==="

104
tests/opencode/test-tools.sh Executable file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Test: Tools Functionality
# Verifies that use_skill and find_skills tools work correctly
# NOTE: These tests require OpenCode to be installed and configured
set -euo pipefail
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
echo "=== Test: Tools Functionality ==="
# Source setup to create isolated environment
source "$SCRIPT_DIR/setup.sh"
# Trap to cleanup on exit
trap cleanup_test_env EXIT
# Check if opencode is available
if ! command -v opencode &> /dev/null; then
echo " [SKIP] OpenCode not installed - skipping integration tests"
echo " To run these tests, install OpenCode: https://opencode.ai"
exit 0
fi
# Test 1: Test find_skills tool via direct invocation
echo "Test 1: Testing find_skills tool..."
echo " Running opencode with find_skills request..."
# Use timeout to prevent hanging, capture both stdout and stderr
output=$(timeout 60s opencode run --print-logs "Use the find_skills tool to list available skills. Just call the tool and show me the raw output." 2>&1) || {
exit_code=$?
if [ $exit_code -eq 124 ]; then
echo " [FAIL] OpenCode timed out after 60s"
exit 1
fi
echo " [WARN] OpenCode returned non-zero exit code: $exit_code"
}
# Check for expected patterns in output
if echo "$output" | grep -qi "superpowers:brainstorming\|superpowers:using-superpowers\|Available skills"; then
echo " [PASS] find_skills tool discovered superpowers skills"
else
echo " [FAIL] find_skills did not return expected skills"
echo " Output was:"
echo "$output" | head -50
exit 1
fi
# Check if personal test skill was found
if echo "$output" | grep -qi "personal-test"; then
echo " [PASS] find_skills found personal test skill"
else
echo " [WARN] personal test skill not found in output (may be ok if tool returned subset)"
fi
# Test 2: Test use_skill tool
echo ""
echo "Test 2: Testing use_skill tool..."
echo " Running opencode with use_skill request..."
output=$(timeout 60s opencode run --print-logs "Use the use_skill tool to load the personal-test skill and show me what you get." 2>&1) || {
exit_code=$?
if [ $exit_code -eq 124 ]; then
echo " [FAIL] OpenCode timed out after 60s"
exit 1
fi
echo " [WARN] OpenCode returned non-zero exit code: $exit_code"
}
# Check for the skill marker we embedded
if echo "$output" | grep -qi "PERSONAL_SKILL_MARKER_12345\|Personal Test Skill\|Launching skill"; then
echo " [PASS] use_skill loaded personal-test skill content"
else
echo " [FAIL] use_skill did not load personal-test skill correctly"
echo " Output was:"
echo "$output" | head -50
exit 1
fi
# Test 3: Test use_skill with superpowers: prefix
echo ""
echo "Test 3: Testing use_skill with superpowers: prefix..."
echo " Running opencode with superpowers:brainstorming skill..."
output=$(timeout 60s opencode run --print-logs "Use the use_skill tool to load superpowers:brainstorming and tell me the first few lines of what you received." 2>&1) || {
exit_code=$?
if [ $exit_code -eq 124 ]; then
echo " [FAIL] OpenCode timed out after 60s"
exit 1
fi
echo " [WARN] OpenCode returned non-zero exit code: $exit_code"
}
# Check for expected content from brainstorming skill
if echo "$output" | grep -qi "brainstorming\|Launching skill\|skill.*loaded"; then
echo " [PASS] use_skill loaded superpowers:brainstorming skill"
else
echo " [FAIL] use_skill did not load superpowers:brainstorming correctly"
echo " Output was:"
echo "$output" | head -50
exit 1
fi
echo ""
echo "=== All tools tests passed ==="

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
I have 4 independent test failures happening in different modules:
1. tests/auth/login.test.ts - "should redirect after login" is failing
2. tests/api/users.test.ts - "should return user list" returns 500
3. tests/components/Button.test.tsx - snapshot mismatch
4. tests/utils/date.test.ts - timezone handling broken
These are unrelated issues in different parts of the codebase. Can you investigate all of them?

View File

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
I have a plan document at docs/plans/2024-01-15-auth-system.md that needs to be executed. Please implement it.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
I just finished implementing the user authentication feature. All the code is committed. Can you review the changes before I merge to main?
The commits are between abc123 and def456.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
The tests are failing with this error:
```
FAIL src/utils/parser.test.ts
● Parser should handle nested objects
TypeError: Cannot read property 'value' of undefined
at parse (src/utils/parser.ts:42:18)
at Object.<anonymous> (src/utils/parser.test.ts:28:20)
```
Can you figure out what's going wrong and fix it?

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
I need to add a new feature to validate email addresses. It should:
- Check that there's an @ symbol
- Check that there's at least one character before the @
- Check that there's a dot in the domain part
- Return true/false
Can you implement this?

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
Here's the spec for our new authentication system:
Requirements:
- Users can register with email/password
- Users can log in and receive a JWT token
- Protected routes require valid JWT
- Tokens expire after 24 hours
- Support password reset via email
We need to implement this. There are multiple steps involved - user model, auth routes, middleware, email service integration.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
#!/bin/bash
# Run all skill triggering tests
# Usage: ./run-all.sh
set -e
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
PROMPTS_DIR="$SCRIPT_DIR/prompts"
SKILLS=(
"systematic-debugging"
"test-driven-development"
"writing-plans"
"dispatching-parallel-agents"
"executing-plans"
"requesting-code-review"
)
echo "=== Running Skill Triggering Tests ==="
echo ""
PASSED=0
FAILED=0
RESULTS=()
for skill in "${SKILLS[@]}"; do
prompt_file="$PROMPTS_DIR/${skill}.txt"
if [ ! -f "$prompt_file" ]; then
echo "⚠️ SKIP: No prompt file for $skill"
continue
fi
echo "Testing: $skill"
if "$SCRIPT_DIR/run-test.sh" "$skill" "$prompt_file" 3 2>&1 | tee /tmp/skill-test-$skill.log; then
PASSED=$((PASSED + 1))
RESULTS+=("$skill")
else
FAILED=$((FAILED + 1))
RESULTS+=("$skill")
fi
echo ""
echo "---"
echo ""
done
echo ""
echo "=== Summary ==="
for result in "${RESULTS[@]}"; do
echo " $result"
done
echo ""
echo "Passed: $PASSED"
echo "Failed: $FAILED"
if [ $FAILED -gt 0 ]; then
exit 1
fi

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
#!/bin/bash
# Test skill triggering with naive prompts
# Usage: ./run-test.sh <skill-name> <prompt-file>
#
# Tests whether Claude triggers a skill based on a natural prompt
# (without explicitly mentioning the skill)
set -e
SKILL_NAME="$1"
PROMPT_FILE="$2"
MAX_TURNS="${3:-3}"
if [ -z "$SKILL_NAME" ] || [ -z "$PROMPT_FILE" ]; then
echo "Usage: $0 <skill-name> <prompt-file> [max-turns]"
echo "Example: $0 systematic-debugging ./test-prompts/debugging.txt"
exit 1
fi
# Get the directory where this script lives (should be tests/skill-triggering)
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
# Get the superpowers plugin root (two levels up from tests/skill-triggering)
PLUGIN_DIR="$(cd "$SCRIPT_DIR/../.." && pwd)"
TIMESTAMP=$(date +%s)
OUTPUT_DIR="/tmp/superpowers-tests/${TIMESTAMP}/skill-triggering/${SKILL_NAME}"
mkdir -p "$OUTPUT_DIR"
# Read prompt from file
PROMPT=$(cat "$PROMPT_FILE")
echo "=== Skill Triggering Test ==="
echo "Skill: $SKILL_NAME"
echo "Prompt file: $PROMPT_FILE"
echo "Max turns: $MAX_TURNS"
echo "Output dir: $OUTPUT_DIR"
echo ""
# Copy prompt for reference
cp "$PROMPT_FILE" "$OUTPUT_DIR/prompt.txt"
# Run Claude
LOG_FILE="$OUTPUT_DIR/claude-output.json"
cd "$OUTPUT_DIR"
echo "Plugin dir: $PLUGIN_DIR"
echo "Running claude -p with naive prompt..."
timeout 300 claude -p "$PROMPT" \
--plugin-dir "$PLUGIN_DIR" \
--dangerously-skip-permissions \
--max-turns "$MAX_TURNS" \
--output-format stream-json \
> "$LOG_FILE" 2>&1 || true
echo ""
echo "=== Results ==="
# Check if skill was triggered (look for Skill tool invocation)
# In stream-json, tool invocations have "name":"Skill" (not "tool":"Skill")
# Match either "skill":"skillname" or "skill":"namespace:skillname"
SKILL_PATTERN='"skill":"([^"]*:)?'"${SKILL_NAME}"'"'
if grep -q '"name":"Skill"' "$LOG_FILE" && grep -qE "$SKILL_PATTERN" "$LOG_FILE"; then
echo "✅ PASS: Skill '$SKILL_NAME' was triggered"
TRIGGERED=true
else
echo "❌ FAIL: Skill '$SKILL_NAME' was NOT triggered"
TRIGGERED=false
fi
# Show what skills WERE triggered
echo ""
echo "Skills triggered in this run:"
grep -o '"skill":"[^"]*"' "$LOG_FILE" 2>/dev/null | sort -u || echo " (none)"
# Show first assistant message
echo ""
echo "First assistant response (truncated):"
grep '"type":"assistant"' "$LOG_FILE" | head -1 | jq -r '.message.content[0].text // .message.content' 2>/dev/null | head -c 500 || echo " (could not extract)"
echo ""
echo "Full log: $LOG_FILE"
echo "Timestamp: $TIMESTAMP"
if [ "$TRIGGERED" = "true" ]; then
exit 0
else
exit 1
fi

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
# Go Fractals CLI - Design
## Overview
A command-line tool that generates ASCII art fractals. Supports two fractal types with configurable output.
## Usage
```bash
# Sierpinski triangle
fractals sierpinski --size 32 --depth 5
# Mandelbrot set
fractals mandelbrot --width 80 --height 24 --iterations 100
# Custom character
fractals sierpinski --size 16 --char '#'
# Help
fractals --help
fractals sierpinski --help
```
## Commands
### `sierpinski`
Generates a Sierpinski triangle using recursive subdivision.
Flags:
- `--size` (default: 32) - Width of the triangle base in characters
- `--depth` (default: 5) - Recursion depth
- `--char` (default: '*') - Character to use for filled points
Output: Triangle printed to stdout, one line per row.
### `mandelbrot`
Renders the Mandelbrot set as ASCII art. Maps iteration count to characters.
Flags:
- `--width` (default: 80) - Output width in characters
- `--height` (default: 24) - Output height in characters
- `--iterations` (default: 100) - Maximum iterations for escape calculation
- `--char` (default: gradient) - Single character, or omit for gradient " .:-=+*#%@"
Output: Rectangle printed to stdout.
## Architecture
```
cmd/
fractals/
main.go # Entry point, CLI setup
internal/
sierpinski/
sierpinski.go # Algorithm
sierpinski_test.go
mandelbrot/
mandelbrot.go # Algorithm
mandelbrot_test.go
cli/
root.go # Root command, help
sierpinski.go # Sierpinski subcommand
mandelbrot.go # Mandelbrot subcommand
```
## Dependencies
- Go 1.21+
- `github.com/spf13/cobra` for CLI
## Acceptance Criteria
1. `fractals --help` shows usage
2. `fractals sierpinski` outputs a recognizable triangle
3. `fractals mandelbrot` outputs a recognizable Mandelbrot set
4. `--size`, `--width`, `--height`, `--depth`, `--iterations` flags work
5. `--char` customizes output character
6. Invalid inputs produce clear error messages
7. All tests pass

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
# Go Fractals CLI - Implementation Plan
Execute this plan using the `superpowers:subagent-driven-development` skill.
## Context
Building a CLI tool that generates ASCII fractals. See `design.md` for full specification.
## Tasks
### Task 1: Project Setup
Create the Go module and directory structure.
**Do:**
- Initialize `go.mod` with module name `github.com/superpowers-test/fractals`
- Create directory structure: `cmd/fractals/`, `internal/sierpinski/`, `internal/mandelbrot/`, `internal/cli/`
- Create minimal `cmd/fractals/main.go` that prints "fractals cli"
- Add `github.com/spf13/cobra` dependency
**Verify:**
- `go build ./cmd/fractals` succeeds
- `./fractals` prints "fractals cli"
---
### Task 2: CLI Framework with Help
Set up Cobra root command with help output.
**Do:**
- Create `internal/cli/root.go` with root command
- Configure help text showing available subcommands
- Wire root command into `main.go`
**Verify:**
- `./fractals --help` shows usage with "sierpinski" and "mandelbrot" listed as available commands
- `./fractals` (no args) shows help
---
### Task 3: Sierpinski Algorithm
Implement the Sierpinski triangle generation algorithm.
**Do:**
- Create `internal/sierpinski/sierpinski.go`
- Implement `Generate(size, depth int, char rune) []string` that returns lines of the triangle
- Use recursive midpoint subdivision algorithm
- Create `internal/sierpinski/sierpinski_test.go` with tests:
- Small triangle (size=4, depth=2) matches expected output
- Size=1 returns single character
- Depth=0 returns filled triangle
**Verify:**
- `go test ./internal/sierpinski/...` passes
---
### Task 4: Sierpinski CLI Integration
Wire the Sierpinski algorithm to a CLI subcommand.
**Do:**
- Create `internal/cli/sierpinski.go` with `sierpinski` subcommand
- Add flags: `--size` (default 32), `--depth` (default 5), `--char` (default '*')
- Call `sierpinski.Generate()` and print result to stdout
**Verify:**
- `./fractals sierpinski` outputs a triangle
- `./fractals sierpinski --size 16 --depth 3` outputs smaller triangle
- `./fractals sierpinski --help` shows flag documentation
---
### Task 5: Mandelbrot Algorithm
Implement the Mandelbrot set ASCII renderer.
**Do:**
- Create `internal/mandelbrot/mandelbrot.go`
- Implement `Render(width, height, maxIter int, char string) []string`
- Map complex plane region (-2.5 to 1.0 real, -1.0 to 1.0 imaginary) to output dimensions
- Map iteration count to character gradient " .:-=+*#%@" (or single char if provided)
- Create `internal/mandelbrot/mandelbrot_test.go` with tests:
- Output dimensions match requested width/height
- Known point inside set (0,0) maps to max-iteration character
- Known point outside set (2,0) maps to low-iteration character
**Verify:**
- `go test ./internal/mandelbrot/...` passes
---
### Task 6: Mandelbrot CLI Integration
Wire the Mandelbrot algorithm to a CLI subcommand.
**Do:**
- Create `internal/cli/mandelbrot.go` with `mandelbrot` subcommand
- Add flags: `--width` (default 80), `--height` (default 24), `--iterations` (default 100), `--char` (default "")
- Call `mandelbrot.Render()` and print result to stdout
**Verify:**
- `./fractals mandelbrot` outputs recognizable Mandelbrot set
- `./fractals mandelbrot --width 40 --height 12` outputs smaller version
- `./fractals mandelbrot --help` shows flag documentation
---
### Task 7: Character Set Configuration
Ensure `--char` flag works consistently across both commands.
**Do:**
- Verify Sierpinski `--char` flag passes character to algorithm
- For Mandelbrot, `--char` should use single character instead of gradient
- Add tests for custom character output
**Verify:**
- `./fractals sierpinski --char '#'` uses '#' character
- `./fractals mandelbrot --char '.'` uses '.' for all filled points
- Tests pass
---
### Task 8: Input Validation and Error Handling
Add validation for invalid inputs.
**Do:**
- Sierpinski: size must be > 0, depth must be >= 0
- Mandelbrot: width/height must be > 0, iterations must be > 0
- Return clear error messages for invalid inputs
- Add tests for error cases
**Verify:**
- `./fractals sierpinski --size 0` prints error, exits non-zero
- `./fractals mandelbrot --width -1` prints error, exits non-zero
- Error messages are clear and helpful
---
### Task 9: Integration Tests
Add integration tests that invoke the CLI.
**Do:**
- Create `cmd/fractals/main_test.go` or `test/integration_test.go`
- Test full CLI invocation for both commands
- Verify output format and exit codes
- Test error cases return non-zero exit
**Verify:**
- `go test ./...` passes all tests including integration tests
---
### Task 10: README
Document usage and examples.
**Do:**
- Create `README.md` with:
- Project description
- Installation: `go install ./cmd/fractals`
- Usage examples for both commands
- Example output (small samples)
**Verify:**
- README accurately describes the tool
- Examples in README actually work

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
#!/bin/bash
# Scaffold the Go Fractals test project
# Usage: ./scaffold.sh /path/to/target/directory
set -e
TARGET_DIR="${1:?Usage: $0 <target-directory>}"
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
# Create target directory
mkdir -p "$TARGET_DIR"
cd "$TARGET_DIR"
# Initialize git repo
git init
# Copy design and plan
cp "$SCRIPT_DIR/design.md" .
cp "$SCRIPT_DIR/plan.md" .
# Create .claude settings to allow reads/writes in this directory
mkdir -p .claude
cat > .claude/settings.local.json << 'SETTINGS'
{
"permissions": {
"allow": [
"Read(**)",
"Edit(**)",
"Write(**)",
"Bash(go:*)",
"Bash(mkdir:*)",
"Bash(git:*)"
]
}
}
SETTINGS
# Create initial commit
git add .
git commit -m "Initial project setup with design and plan"
echo "Scaffolded Go Fractals project at: $TARGET_DIR"
echo ""
echo "To run the test:"
echo " claude -p \"Execute this plan using superpowers:subagent-driven-development. Plan: $TARGET_DIR/plan.md\" --plugin-dir /path/to/superpowers"

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
#!/bin/bash
# Run a subagent-driven-development test
# Usage: ./run-test.sh <test-name> [--plugin-dir <path>]
#
# Example:
# ./run-test.sh go-fractals
# ./run-test.sh svelte-todo --plugin-dir /path/to/superpowers
set -e
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
TEST_NAME="${1:?Usage: $0 <test-name> [--plugin-dir <path>]}"
shift
# Parse optional arguments
PLUGIN_DIR=""
while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]; do
case $1 in
--plugin-dir)
PLUGIN_DIR="$2"
shift 2
;;
*)
echo "Unknown option: $1"
exit 1
;;
esac
done
# Default plugin dir to parent of tests directory
if [[ -z "$PLUGIN_DIR" ]]; then
PLUGIN_DIR="$(cd "$SCRIPT_DIR/../.." && pwd)"
fi
# Verify test exists
TEST_DIR="$SCRIPT_DIR/$TEST_NAME"
if [[ ! -d "$TEST_DIR" ]]; then
echo "Error: Test '$TEST_NAME' not found at $TEST_DIR"
echo "Available tests:"
ls -1 "$SCRIPT_DIR" | grep -v '\.sh$' | grep -v '\.md$'
exit 1
fi
# Create timestamped output directory
TIMESTAMP=$(date +%s)
OUTPUT_BASE="/tmp/superpowers-tests/$TIMESTAMP/subagent-driven-development"
OUTPUT_DIR="$OUTPUT_BASE/$TEST_NAME"
mkdir -p "$OUTPUT_DIR"
echo "=== Subagent-Driven Development Test ==="
echo "Test: $TEST_NAME"
echo "Output: $OUTPUT_DIR"
echo "Plugin: $PLUGIN_DIR"
echo ""
# Scaffold the project
echo ">>> Scaffolding project..."
"$TEST_DIR/scaffold.sh" "$OUTPUT_DIR/project"
echo ""
# Prepare the prompt
PLAN_PATH="$OUTPUT_DIR/project/plan.md"
PROMPT="Execute this plan using superpowers:subagent-driven-development. The plan is at: $PLAN_PATH"
# Run Claude with JSON output for token tracking
LOG_FILE="$OUTPUT_DIR/claude-output.json"
echo ">>> Running Claude..."
echo "Prompt: $PROMPT"
echo "Log file: $LOG_FILE"
echo ""
# Run claude and capture output
# Using stream-json to get token usage stats
# --dangerously-skip-permissions for automated testing (subagents don't inherit parent settings)
cd "$OUTPUT_DIR/project"
claude -p "$PROMPT" \
--plugin-dir "$PLUGIN_DIR" \
--dangerously-skip-permissions \
--output-format stream-json \
> "$LOG_FILE" 2>&1 || true
# Extract final stats
echo ""
echo ">>> Test complete"
echo "Project directory: $OUTPUT_DIR/project"
echo "Claude log: $LOG_FILE"
echo ""
# Show token usage if available
if command -v jq &> /dev/null; then
echo ">>> Token usage:"
# Extract usage from the last message with usage info
jq -s '[.[] | select(.type == "result")] | last | .usage' "$LOG_FILE" 2>/dev/null || echo "(could not parse usage)"
echo ""
fi
echo ">>> Next steps:"
echo "1. Review the project: cd $OUTPUT_DIR/project"
echo "2. Review Claude's log: less $LOG_FILE"
echo "3. Check if tests pass:"
if [[ "$TEST_NAME" == "go-fractals" ]]; then
echo " cd $OUTPUT_DIR/project && go test ./..."
elif [[ "$TEST_NAME" == "svelte-todo" ]]; then
echo " cd $OUTPUT_DIR/project && npm test && npx playwright test"
fi

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
# Svelte Todo List - Design
## Overview
A simple todo list application built with Svelte. Supports creating, completing, and deleting todos with localStorage persistence.
## Features
- Add new todos
- Mark todos as complete/incomplete
- Delete todos
- Filter by: All / Active / Completed
- Clear all completed todos
- Persist to localStorage
- Show count of remaining items
## User Interface
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Svelte Todos │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ [________________________] [Add] │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ [ ] Buy groceries [x] │
│ [✓] Walk the dog [x] │
│ [ ] Write code [x] │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 2 items left │
│ [All] [Active] [Completed] [Clear ✓] │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
## Components
```
src/
App.svelte # Main app, state management
lib/
TodoInput.svelte # Text input + Add button
TodoList.svelte # List container
TodoItem.svelte # Single todo with checkbox, text, delete
FilterBar.svelte # Filter buttons + clear completed
store.ts # Svelte store for todos
storage.ts # localStorage persistence
```
## Data Model
```typescript
interface Todo {
id: string; // UUID
text: string; // Todo text
completed: boolean;
}
type Filter = 'all' | 'active' | 'completed';
```
## Acceptance Criteria
1. Can add a todo by typing and pressing Enter or clicking Add
2. Can toggle todo completion by clicking checkbox
3. Can delete a todo by clicking X button
4. Filter buttons show correct subset of todos
5. "X items left" shows count of incomplete todos
6. "Clear completed" removes all completed todos
7. Todos persist across page refresh (localStorage)
8. Empty state shows helpful message
9. All tests pass

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
# Svelte Todo List - Implementation Plan
Execute this plan using the `superpowers:subagent-driven-development` skill.
## Context
Building a todo list app with Svelte. See `design.md` for full specification.
## Tasks
### Task 1: Project Setup
Create the Svelte project with Vite.
**Do:**
- Run `npm create vite@latest . -- --template svelte-ts`
- Install dependencies with `npm install`
- Verify dev server works
- Clean up default Vite template content from App.svelte
**Verify:**
- `npm run dev` starts server
- App shows minimal "Svelte Todos" heading
- `npm run build` succeeds
---
### Task 2: Todo Store
Create the Svelte store for todo state management.
**Do:**
- Create `src/lib/store.ts`
- Define `Todo` interface with id, text, completed
- Create writable store with initial empty array
- Export functions: `addTodo(text)`, `toggleTodo(id)`, `deleteTodo(id)`, `clearCompleted()`
- Create `src/lib/store.test.ts` with tests for each function
**Verify:**
- Tests pass: `npm run test` (install vitest if needed)
---
### Task 3: localStorage Persistence
Add persistence layer for todos.
**Do:**
- Create `src/lib/storage.ts`
- Implement `loadTodos(): Todo[]` and `saveTodos(todos: Todo[])`
- Handle JSON parse errors gracefully (return empty array)
- Integrate with store: load on init, save on change
- Add tests for load/save/error handling
**Verify:**
- Tests pass
- Manual test: add todo, refresh page, todo persists
---
### Task 4: TodoInput Component
Create the input component for adding todos.
**Do:**
- Create `src/lib/TodoInput.svelte`
- Text input bound to local state
- Add button calls `addTodo()` and clears input
- Enter key also submits
- Disable Add button when input is empty
- Add component tests
**Verify:**
- Tests pass
- Component renders input and button
---
### Task 5: TodoItem Component
Create the single todo item component.
**Do:**
- Create `src/lib/TodoItem.svelte`
- Props: `todo: Todo`
- Checkbox toggles completion (calls `toggleTodo`)
- Text with strikethrough when completed
- Delete button (X) calls `deleteTodo`
- Add component tests
**Verify:**
- Tests pass
- Component renders checkbox, text, delete button
---
### Task 6: TodoList Component
Create the list container component.
**Do:**
- Create `src/lib/TodoList.svelte`
- Props: `todos: Todo[]`
- Renders TodoItem for each todo
- Shows "No todos yet" when empty
- Add component tests
**Verify:**
- Tests pass
- Component renders list of TodoItems
---
### Task 7: FilterBar Component
Create the filter and status bar component.
**Do:**
- Create `src/lib/FilterBar.svelte`
- Props: `todos: Todo[]`, `filter: Filter`, `onFilterChange: (f: Filter) => void`
- Show count: "X items left" (incomplete count)
- Three filter buttons: All, Active, Completed
- Active filter is visually highlighted
- "Clear completed" button (hidden when no completed todos)
- Add component tests
**Verify:**
- Tests pass
- Component renders count, filters, clear button
---
### Task 8: App Integration
Wire all components together in App.svelte.
**Do:**
- Import all components and store
- Add filter state (default: 'all')
- Compute filtered todos based on filter state
- Render: heading, TodoInput, TodoList, FilterBar
- Pass appropriate props to each component
**Verify:**
- App renders all components
- Adding todos works
- Toggling works
- Deleting works
---
### Task 9: Filter Functionality
Ensure filtering works end-to-end.
**Do:**
- Verify filter buttons change displayed todos
- 'all' shows all todos
- 'active' shows only incomplete todos
- 'completed' shows only completed todos
- Clear completed removes completed todos and resets filter if needed
- Add integration tests
**Verify:**
- Filter tests pass
- Manual verification of all filter states
---
### Task 10: Styling and Polish
Add CSS styling for usability.
**Do:**
- Style the app to match the design mockup
- Completed todos have strikethrough and muted color
- Active filter button is highlighted
- Input has focus styles
- Delete button appears on hover (or always on mobile)
- Responsive layout
**Verify:**
- App is visually usable
- Styles don't break functionality
---
### Task 11: End-to-End Tests
Add Playwright tests for full user flows.
**Do:**
- Install Playwright: `npm init playwright@latest`
- Create `tests/todo.spec.ts`
- Test flows:
- Add a todo
- Complete a todo
- Delete a todo
- Filter todos
- Clear completed
- Persistence (add, reload, verify)
**Verify:**
- `npx playwright test` passes
---
### Task 12: README
Document the project.
**Do:**
- Create `README.md` with:
- Project description
- Setup: `npm install`
- Development: `npm run dev`
- Testing: `npm test` and `npx playwright test`
- Build: `npm run build`
**Verify:**
- README accurately describes the project
- Instructions work

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
#!/bin/bash
# Scaffold the Svelte Todo test project
# Usage: ./scaffold.sh /path/to/target/directory
set -e
TARGET_DIR="${1:?Usage: $0 <target-directory>}"
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
# Create target directory
mkdir -p "$TARGET_DIR"
cd "$TARGET_DIR"
# Initialize git repo
git init
# Copy design and plan
cp "$SCRIPT_DIR/design.md" .
cp "$SCRIPT_DIR/plan.md" .
# Create .claude settings to allow reads/writes in this directory
mkdir -p .claude
cat > .claude/settings.local.json << 'SETTINGS'
{
"permissions": {
"allow": [
"Read(**)",
"Edit(**)",
"Write(**)",
"Bash(npm:*)",
"Bash(npx:*)",
"Bash(mkdir:*)",
"Bash(git:*)"
]
}
}
SETTINGS
# Create initial commit
git add .
git commit -m "Initial project setup with design and plan"
echo "Scaffolded Svelte Todo project at: $TARGET_DIR"
echo ""
echo "To run the test:"
echo " claude -p \"Execute this plan using superpowers:subagent-driven-development. Plan: $TARGET_DIR/plan.md\" --plugin-dir /path/to/superpowers"