Compare commits

..

110 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Drew Ritter
22b1eeec69 docs(windows): trim polyglot hook implementation copy 2026-06-01 16:03:55 -07:00
dev_Hakaze
9d3e68a5ad docs(windows): update polyglot hook docs
Rewrite the Windows polyglot hook documentation to match the current run-hook.cmd dispatcher and update the porting guide cross-reference.\n\nFixes #1653.
2026-06-01 15:57:30 -07:00
nestorluiscamachopaz
81c3052416 fix: foreground mode saves node PID and clears OWNER_PID on Windows/MSYS2
Verified on real Windows Git Bash: lifecycle test passed 12/12, manual start/stop released the port, and no brainstorm node processes remained.
2026-06-01 14:26:22 -07:00
nawfal
c879454a0d fix(finishing-a-development-branch): remove gh-specific PR creation instruction
Per obra's guidance on #1609: remove the github-specific instruction rather
than replacing it with a platform-detection table. Agents already know their
forge tooling; the skill only needs to cover the push step.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-01 13:58:22 -07:00
nawfal
ff213eb2cf fix(finishing-a-development-branch): detect remote platform before creating PR/MR
Replaces hardcoded `gh pr create` in Option 2 with a platform-neutral
note: check `git remote get-url origin` first, then use gh (GitHub),
glab (GitLab), or fall back to the compare URL for unknown platforms.

Adds matching Red Flag entry so agents don't skip the detection step.

Fixes #1609

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-01 13:58:22 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
da00e59958 feat: add Antigravity CLI (agy) support
Antigravity (Google's `agy` CLI) installs the existing Superpowers plugin
directly:

    agy plugin install https://github.com/obra/superpowers

agy imports the bundled skills and runs the plugin's SessionStart hook, so
using-superpowers bootstraps from the first message — verified on agy 1.0.3:
a fresh session given "Let's make a react todo list" auto-triggers the
brainstorming skill instead of writing code. agy discovers skills natively
and, having no Skill tool, loads them by reading SKILL.md with view_file.

No scaffold, installer, or generated context file is needed. This adds only:

- README.md: an Antigravity install section + Quickstart link
- skills/using-superpowers/SKILL.md: reference to the agy tool mapping
- skills/using-superpowers/references/antigravity-tools.md: action->tool
  mapping for agy (view_file, write_to_file, invoke_subagent, manage_task,
  and skill loading via view_file on SKILL.md)
- tests/antigravity/: structural test for the tool mapping, mirroring
  tests/pi/
2026-06-01 11:42:09 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
deceaec78d docs: add 'Porting Superpowers to a New Harness' guide
An evergreen guide for adding support for a new harness (IDE, CLI, or agent
runner). Teaches the invariants — automatic session-start bootstrap, skill
discovery/invocation, tool mapping, the acceptance test — and points at the
closest reference integration shape (shell-hook, in-process plugin,
instructions-file / declared context file) to copy. Covers discovery, build,
local install, tmux-driven verification, distribution, and PR submission, with a
live reference-integration index and a gotchas appendix.

Two non-negotiable rules: (1) never edit skill bodies; (2) everything ships
through the harness's own install mechanism — never edit the user's config. When
a plugin installer strips undeclared files, declare the bootstrap as a recognized
component (a manifest contextFileName-style context file the installer preserves
and the harness loads every session), generated at install time from the live
SKILL.md + tool mapping. Surfaced-skill-description bootstrap is the softer
fallback.

Hardened against real end-to-end ports (Antigravity CLI): shapes can compose; a
fork doesn't inherit its parent's behavior; a hook system != a usable
session-start event; verify @-includes AND context-file preservation with a
marker; web-search the docs and study existing plugins; reverse-engineer
undocumented harnesses; print/headless modes may hang; workspace-trust gates
stall tmux; declared context files survive plugin install while undeclared files
are stripped; skills-path registration is per-harness.
2026-06-01 10:07:38 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
e63e44bedf fix(sync-to-codex-plugin): exclude /.pi/ so the pi extension doesn't leak into the Codex plugin
The .pi/ directory holds the pi-harness extension (.pi/extensions/superpowers.ts),
which is tracked (not git-ignored), so the git-ignored-path exclusion helpers
never caught it. It was also missing from the static EXCLUDES list alongside the
other harness dotdirs (.opencode, .cursor-plugin, .claude-plugin), so a sync
would rsync pi's files into the Codex plugin distribution. Add /.pi/ to EXCLUDES.
2026-05-29 15:05:38 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
8811b0f2d7 Revert "Make visual-companion.md script paths skill-rooted, not plugin-rooted"
This reverts commit e9f5188289.
2026-05-23 17:01:46 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
d48bec6cc3 Revert "Probe per-user Git Bash and Scoop before falling back to PATH on Windows"
This reverts commit a8f0738e3a.
2026-05-23 17:00:15 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
a8f0738e3a Probe per-user Git Bash and Scoop before falling back to PATH on Windows
Stock Windows 10/11 ships C:\Windows\System32\bash.exe (the WSL
launcher) as the first match for `where bash`. WSL's bash cannot
execute Windows-style script paths, so when Git Bash is installed
outside the two standard system locations -- specifically the
per-user "Only for me" Git for Windows installer
(%LOCALAPPDATA%\Programs\Git) or a Scoop install
(%USERPROFILE%\scoop\apps\git\current\usr\bin) -- run-hook.cmd
silently fails: WSL prints "Windows Subsystem for Linux must be
updated", the script returns 0, and Superpowers' SessionStart
bootstrap is never injected. From the user's perspective skills
auto-trigger inconsistently or not at all, with no surfaced error.

Add explicit probes for both locations between the existing system-
wide Git for Windows checks and the `where bash` fallback. Also add
a comment to the fallback documenting the WSL-launcher trap so future
maintainers understand why the explicit probes must come first.

Verified on a Windows 11 VM (dockur/windows 11, Git Bash 2.x, Node
22):
- System Git present: existing probe still matches (no regression)
- System Git absent, per-user Git present via junction: new probe
  matches, hook produces valid 6422-byte JSON, exit 0
- All Git probes absent: confirmed WSL trap fires
  ("Windows Subsystem for Linux must be updated") and the hook exits 0
  silently, demonstrating the original bug

Existing tests/hooks/test-session-start.sh still passes on macOS (7/7).

Reported by @ytchenak in #1607.

Co-authored-by: ytchenak <ytchenak@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes #1607.
2026-05-23 16:58:56 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
f36bad5b78 Pipe SessionStart hook printf through cat to absorb EPIPE on Windows
On Windows + Git Bash, the SessionStart hook prints a confusing
diagnostic at every startup ("printf: write error: Permission denied")
when Claude Code closes the hook's stdout pipe before the printf has
finished writing. The hook still runs to completion and context still
gets injected, but the diagnostic surfaces every session because
Git Bash's printf reports EPIPE as "Permission denied" (not "Broken
pipe" like Linux) and our `set -euo pipefail` lets that error escape.

Piping each printf through `cat` makes the external cat process the
recipient of any SIGPIPE / EPIPE. cat's failure does not propagate to
the parent bash under pipefail because cat is the last command in the
pipeline and exits cleanly when the pipe stays open long enough to
hold the data. On macOS/Linux the cat passthrough is transparent (no
behavior change, no measurable cost).

Verified:
- Existing tests/hooks/test-session-start.sh: 7/7 pass on macOS
- Manual run on Windows 11 + Git Bash 5.2 + Node 22 produces valid JSON,
  clean stderr, and exit 0
- JSON output is byte-identical to the unpatched hook

Reported by @silvertakana in #1612, attribution preserved in the
Co-authored-by trailer below — this is the same fix shape the original
PR proposed.

Co-authored-by: silvertakana <silvertakana@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes #1612.
2026-05-23 16:55:46 -07:00
Nick Galatis
21ad401e90 fix(systematic-debugging): defuse Claude Code ultrathink keyword scanner trigger (#1558)
The "Signals You're Doing It Wrong" bullet in systematic-debugging/SKILL.md
contains the literal token Claude Code's runtime scans for in tool result
bodies. Every Skill-tool invocation of this skill caused the harness to
inject a spurious system-reminder claiming the user requested deeper
reasoning, silently bumping every session into extended thinking.

Replace the bullet's spelling so the contiguous letter sequence the scanner
matches is broken with a hyphen. The signal text remains recognizable to
the agent and the documented action ("Question fundamentals, not just
symptoms") is unchanged.

Fixes obra/superpowers#1283
2026-05-23 16:51:00 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
e9f5188289 Make visual-companion.md script paths skill-rooted, not plugin-rooted
Issue #1134: agents reading visual-companion.md see bare commands like
`scripts/start-server.sh`, correctly identify the plugin install
directory, then look for `<plugin>/scripts/start-server.sh` instead of
`<plugin>/skills/brainstorming/scripts/start-server.sh`. The file
doesn't exist at the plugin-rooted path, so the agent concludes the
visual companion isn't available and falls back to text-only
brainstorming.

Multiple independent reproductions in the issue thread, plus one user's
agent self-reported: "I assumed the scripts folder was in the root
directory of the plugin, it didn't realize it could have been talking
about the skill folder itself."

Change all `scripts/<file>` references in visual-companion.md to
`skills/brainstorming/scripts/<file>`. Agents that correctly identify
the plugin root will now join to the right path.

Closes #1134.
2026-05-23 16:42:13 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
eef50b96f0 Align windows-lifecycle test with current brainstorm server layout
The test had drifted behind three server implementation changes and no
longer ran against the actual server:

- Server entrypoint renamed from server.js to server.cjs; the test still
  invoked node on server.js and failed with MODULE_NOT_FOUND.
- Server state moved to a state/ subdirectory (state/server-info,
  state/server.pid); the test still waited on .server-info and wrote
  .server.pid at the session root.
- Owner-PID startup validation now keeps the server running when the
  owner PID is dead at startup: it logs owner-pid-invalid, disables
  owner monitoring, and falls back to the idle timeout. The test still
  expected the server to self-terminate within 60s of a dead-at-startup
  owner.

Update file/path references to match the current server, and rewrite
the dead-at-startup test to assert the current behavior: server
survives, log contains owner-pid-invalid, log does not contain a
spurious "owner process exited" line.

Verified locally: 9 passed, 0 failed, 3 skipped (Windows-only).
2026-05-23 16:36:45 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
e1d3f71e0d Convert curly to square brackets in code-reviewer.md placeholders
Matches the style used by the spec-reviewer-prompt.md and
code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md call sites, which already use square
brackets ([VAR] or [VAR — description]). No semantic change — these
placeholders are filled in by the controller; nothing programmatic
substitutes them.
2026-05-23 16:14:24 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
b2212dc913 Scope spec reviewer to task diff and make reviewers read-only
Two problems with the SDD reviewer prompts on dev:

- spec-reviewer-prompt.md never received a git range, so the
  general-purpose subagent had to crawl the entire codebase to find what
  changed. Reporter measured 20-33 minute spec reviews on simple tasks
  (#1538).
- Neither reviewer prompt told the subagent that review is read-only.
  A spec reviewer running `git checkout <parent-sha>` for historical
  comparison silently detached HEAD on the controller's branch, then
  subsequent task commits accumulated on the detached HEAD and were
  effectively orphaned (#1543, reproduced independently in #1543's
  thread).

Add a Git Range to Review section to spec-reviewer-prompt.md that
mirrors the one code-reviewer.md already has, plus a Read-Only Review
section in both reviewer prompt templates stating the principle: do
not mutate the working tree, the index, HEAD, or branch state. Allow
inspecting other revisions via a separate temporary worktree, so the
read-only rule does not block legitimate historical comparison.

Closes #1538.
Closes #1543.
2026-05-23 16:14:05 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
180f009090 @mhat reported that his claude got confused about 'debugging' being named as a skill in the bootstrap 2026-05-21 17:23:25 -04:00
Drew Ritter
8c1f7c5dae Bump superpowers-evals submodule 2026-05-14 16:32:24 -07:00
Drew Ritter
201f945838 [codex] support native Codex plugin hooks (#1540)
* docs: specify Codex native hooks parity

* docs: refine Codex hooks spec after review

* docs: record Codex hook contract spike

* docs: plan Codex native hooks implementation

* feat: support Codex native plugin hooks

* test: add Codex native hook drill coverage

* Simplify Codex hook entrypoint
2026-05-14 15:59:38 -07:00
Drew Ritter
49bf5ad6dc Align Pi mapping with action vocabulary 2026-05-13 17:58:46 -07:00
Drew Ritter
4bd0973879 Bump evals submodule for Pi backend 2026-05-13 17:58:46 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
452f1ed40b chore: keep pi extension under .pi 2026-05-13 17:58:46 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
cafbc5a4bd feat: add pi superpowers package extension 2026-05-13 17:58:46 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
da35948daf docs: plan pi extension and evals work 2026-05-13 17:58:46 -07:00
Drew Ritter
d4d99117f2 Tighten cross-platform tool references 2026-05-13 17:46:28 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
01034bcf8f Phase E: action-language tool vocabulary
Replace Claude-Code-specific tool names in skill prose, prompt
templates, and OpenCode-facing docs with action-language descriptions
that resolve to each runtime's native tool via the per-platform refs.

Changes by category:

- Prose mentions ("Use TodoWrite to track...", "Use Task tool with
  general-purpose type") → action language ("Track each item as a
  todo", "Dispatch a general-purpose subagent")

- Prompt template headers (6 files): "Task tool (general-purpose):"
  → "Subagent (general-purpose):" — preserves the type information
  without naming Claude Code's specific dispatch tool

- DOT flowchart node labels: "Invoke Skill tool" → "Invoke the
  skill"; "Create TodoWrite todo per item" → "Create a todo per
  item"

- OpenCode INSTALL.md and docs/README.opencode.md: replace the old
  "TodoWrite → todowrite, Task → @mention" mapping (which both
  taught a vocabulary skills no longer use AND was wrong about
  @mention being a real OpenCode syntax) with an action-language
  mapping verified against the installed OpenCode CLI's tool
  inventory.

The platform-tools refs landed in Phase B already document each
runtime's resolution; skills now speak in the actions those refs
map. Tool names that genuinely belong only in the per-platform
dispatch section ("In Claude Code: Use the `Skill` tool") and the
Claude-Code-specific Bash run_in_background flag note in
visual-companion remain — those are intentional carve-outs.
2026-05-13 17:46:28 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
b87a5e4721 Phase D: cross-runtime tweaks (visual-companion, executing-plans, test)
Misc platform/runtime statements and adjacencies that don't fit the
prose, config-ref, README-ordering, or tool-vocabulary buckets:

- visual-companion frame template: rename CSS/HTML id #claude-content
  → #frame-content. The id is purely styling — nothing external
  references it. The brainstorm-server test that asserted the old
  string is updated in lockstep.

- visual-companion launch instructions: add a Copilot CLI section
  alongside Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini CLI; combine the Claude
  Code (macOS / Linux) and (Windows) sections so heading style
  matches the other (non-OS-qualified) platforms.

- visual-companion: "Use Write tool" → "Use your file-creation tool"
  for the cat/heredoc warning. The prohibition is what's load-
  bearing, not the tool name.

- executing-plans/SKILL.md: list all subagent-capable runtimes
  (Claude Code, Codex CLI, Codex App, Copilot CLI, Gemini CLI) and
  point at the per-platform tool refs as the source of truth.

- executing-plans/SKILL.md: relative path "using-superpowers/
  references/" → "../using-superpowers/references/" to resolve
  correctly from the executing-plans/ directory.

No bundled spec doc here — Phase D was scope-extension work that
took place across rounds, with no standalone spec authored.
2026-05-13 17:46:28 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
e47d6f4f85 Phase C: alphabetize README platform listings + spec
Quickstart link list and the per-harness install sub-sections both
reorder to strict alphabetical:

  Claude Code, Codex App, Codex CLI, Cursor, Factory Droid,
  Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot CLI, OpenCode

Three blocks moved (Codex App swaps with Codex CLI; Cursor moves up
two slots; GitHub Copilot CLI moves up one). Claude Code stays first
by alphabetical chance.

Each install sub-section's content is byte-identical pre/post —
only the positions change. Quickstart anchors verified against the
new heading order.
2026-05-13 17:46:28 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
5c0402736e Phase B: config-file refs + per-platform tool refs + spec
Two structural changes:

1. Generalize CLAUDE.md-specific guidance:
   - "Project-specific conventions (put in CLAUDE.md)" → "(put in
     your instructions file)" in writing-skills/SKILL.md
   - "(explicit CLAUDE.md violation)" → "(explicit instruction-file
     violation)" in receiving-code-review/SKILL.md
   - The instruction-priority list in using-superpowers/SKILL.md
     stays inclusive (CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, AGENTS.md) — that's
     load-bearing, not a substitution opportunity.

2. Per-platform tool reference files at skills/using-superpowers/
   references/{claude-code,codex,copilot,gemini}-tools.md. Each ref
   documents:
   - The runtime's preferred instructions file (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md,
     GEMINI.md, etc.) and how it loads
   - The runtime's personal-skills directory + cross-runtime
     ~/.agents/skills/ path where applicable
   - Action-language → tool-name mapping table

Tool names and table content reflect the source-verified state from
direct inspection of openai/codex, google-gemini/gemini-cli,
sst/opencode, and the installed @github/copilot package. Filenames
and behaviors are sourced from each runtime's official docs.

Files in this commit also pick up later-phase changes that
accumulated on the same files (using-superpowers/SKILL.md "How to
Access Skills" overhaul, action-language flowchart, refs' final
table content). The bundled spec records original scope.
2026-05-13 17:46:28 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
d0e413b591 Phase A: agent-neutral prose + CSO → SDO + spec
Replace generic third-person "Claude" with "agents" / "your agent"
forms across active skill prose, the README intro, and the vendored
anthropic-best-practices.md reference. Carve-outs preserved:
historical attribution paths, the "Variant C: Claude.AI Emphatic
Style" example label, model identifiers (Haiku/Sonnet/Opus), and the
"In Claude Code:" per-platform skill-dispatch list.

Coined-term rename: "Claude Search Optimization (CSO)" → "Skill
Discovery Optimization (SDO)" in writing-skills/SKILL.md.

Files in this commit also pick up later-phase changes that
accumulated on the same files (dispatching-parallel-agents code-
example transformation, writing-skills numbering and path fixes).
The bundled spec at docs/superpowers/specs/ records the original
scope and the carve-outs.

README.md gets only its prose change here; the alphabetization
lands in Phase C's commit.
2026-05-13 17:46:28 -07:00
Drew Ritter
d25618db58 Move eval harness to submodule (#1541) 2026-05-13 12:25:41 -07:00
Drew Ritter
3d6dc90c6d fix(tdd): link testing anti-patterns reference (#1532)
Fixes #1529.
2026-05-12 17:22:42 -07:00
Drew Ritter
a152bb3932 [codex] replace Circle K signal with generic review guidance (#1531)
* Remove Circle K signal from review skill

* Add generic review hesitation guidance

* Use Jesse wording for review hesitation guidance
2026-05-12 17:22:19 -07:00
Drew Ritter
3dfb376268 fix: remove global worktree path fallback (#1476) 2026-05-12 10:24:45 -07:00
Drew Ritter
491df7360c fix(using-git-worktrees): repair skipped Step 2 numbering (#1522) 2026-05-11 17:50:01 -07:00
fuleinist
9088f563e7 fix: remove stale Cursor plugin refs 2026-05-11 17:04:35 -07:00
Stable Genius
d4cf61b4c8 fix(writing-skills): use markdown link for testing methodology reference 2026-05-11 16:51:00 -07:00
Drew Ritter
7f02ccd91b evals: use pre-commit hooks 2026-05-06 15:47:39 -07:00
Drew Ritter
35e42a16ce evals: add Gemini 2.5 Flash backend 2026-05-06 15:47:39 -07:00
Drew Ritter
58082d04f8 evals: drop drill source marker 2026-05-06 15:47:39 -07:00
Drew Ritter
3dc0ea6876 evals: remove unreleased wave scenarios 2026-05-06 15:47:39 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
0bf37499b4 Address adversarial review findings
- evals/README.md, evals/CLAUDE.md: fix uv install command from
  'uv sync --dev' to 'uv sync --extra dev'. Drill's pyproject.toml
  uses [project.optional-dependencies], so --dev is a no-op for
  pytest/ruff/ty; --extra dev is the correct invocation.
- tests/claude-code/run-skill-tests.sh: drop test-requesting-code-review.sh
  from integration_tests array (file deleted earlier in this branch).
- tests/claude-code/README.md: replace test-requesting-code-review.sh
  section with test-worktree-native-preference.sh (the worktree test
  is kept; the code-review test was lifted into drill).
- docs/testing.md, CLAUDE.md: remove "Copilot CLI" from the harness
  list. evals/backends/ has claude*, codex, gemini configs but no
  copilot.yaml, so the claim was unsupported.

Adversarial review credit: reviewer #2 found four legitimate issues
(uv-sync, run-skill-tests stale ref, README stale ref via #1, and
Copilot CLI fabrication); reviewer #1 found two distinct issues
(run-skill-tests + tests/claude-code/README.md). Reviewer #2 wins
this round.
2026-05-06 15:47:39 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
f7c5312265 docs: introduce evals/ as the canonical skill-behavior eval harness
- docs/testing.md split into Plugin tests + Skill behavior evals.
  Plugin tests section enumerates the bash tests that survive
  (kept by drill-coverage analysis or as describe-skill tests).
- CLAUDE.md adds Eval harness section pointing at evals/.
- README.md Contributing section mentions evals/ alongside tests/.
- .gitignore adds evals/{results,.venv,.env} as belt-and-suspenders
  (evals/.gitignore covers these locally; root-level entries help
  tooling that does not recurse into nested ignore files).
2026-05-06 15:47:39 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
f5175fb31a docs: annotate dated artifacts referencing lifted bash tests
- RELEASE-NOTES.md: note that test-requesting-code-review.sh and
  test-document-review-system.sh were lifted into drill scenarios
  on 2026-05-06; references are preserved as dated artifacts.
- docs/superpowers/plans/2026-03-23-codex-app-compatibility.md:
  note that tests/skill-triggering/ was lifted into drill scenarios
  on 2026-05-06; the run-all.sh reference is a dated artifact.

Subagent second-pass scrub confirmed no other active references in
the tree (excluding evals/ and the spec/plan for this work itself).
2026-05-06 15:47:39 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
45c7dc2cce tests: annotate three kept bash tests with drill coverage notes
- test-worktree-native-preference.sh: drill covers PRESSURE phase only;
  RED + GREEN baselines have no drill counterpart and are kept so
  the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR validation remains rerunnable end-to-end.
- test-subagent-driven-development-integration.sh: drill covers the
  YAGNI subset (forbidden exports + reviewer-as-gate). Bash adds
  >=3 commits, >=2 subagent dispatches, TodoWrite usage, test file
  existence check, and token-budget telemetry. Kept until drill
  scenario covers those or they are retired.
- test-subagent-driven-development.sh: tests agent's ability to
  *describe* SDD (string matches against expected keywords). Drill
  scenarios test behavior, not description-recall. Kept by design.

Subagent verification recorded in commit messages of subsequent
deletions; gap analyses driving these annotations are also in the
verification subagent reports for the gating sweep.
2026-05-06 15:47:39 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
39d29a6c28 tests: remove test-requesting-code-review.sh (covered by drill code-review-catches-planted-bugs)
Subagent verification: every bash assertion (skill invocation,
subagent dispatch, SQL injection flagged, credential handling
flagged, no merge approval) maps to drill verify checks. Drill is
stricter: bundles severity (Critical/Important) into the same
criteria as the finding itself (bash split severity into a separate
test). Setup parity covered (src/db.js with string concat + identity
hash, two commits).

The drill scenario header explicitly says it is the
"cross-harness, semantically-judged replacement for the bash test."
2026-05-06 15:47:39 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
f1d2005de3 tests: remove test-document-review-system.sh (covered by drill spec-reviewer-catches-planted-flaws)
Subagent verification: every bash assertion (TODO in Requirements
section flagged, "specified later" deferral flagged, Issues section
present, did-not-approve verdict) maps to drill verify.criteria
entries. Setup parity covered by setup.assertions (test-feature-design.md
exists with TODO + 'specified later' content). Drill is stricter:
asserts tool-called Agent (subagent dispatch) which the bash test
did not check.
2026-05-06 15:47:39 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
c0a65f1b4d tests: remove subagent-driven-dev fixtures (covered by drill sdd-go-fractals + sdd-svelte-todo)
The bash test had ZERO output assertions — it just ran claude -p
and printed token usage. Drill's scenarios are strictly more
rigorous:

go-fractals: skill-called SDD + tool-called Agent + go test ./...
passes + cmd/fractals/main.go exists + >=4 commits + LLM criteria
verifying real SDD workflow.

svelte-todo: skill-called SDD + tool-called Agent + npm test passes
+ playwright e2e passes + package.json + svelte.config.js or
vite.config.ts + >=4 commits + LLM criteria.

design.md and plan.md are byte-identical between bash fixtures and
drill fixtures (evals/fixtures/sdd-{go-fractals,svelte-todo}/).
Drill's setup helper (scaffold_sdd_*) forces git init -b main
(stricter than bash's reliance on init.defaultBranch). The
.claude/settings.local.json from bash scaffold.sh is unnecessary
for drill since permissions are managed via backend YAML.

Subagent verification: SAFE TO DELETE for both.
2026-05-06 15:47:39 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
f10cddac0d tests: remove run-claude-describes-sdd.sh (covered by drill mid-conversation-skill-invocation)
Subagent verification: every bash assertion (Skill tool invoked +
specific skill name 'subagent-driven-development' loaded after the
agent describes it conversationally in turn 1) maps to the drill
scenario's skill-called assertion + criteria paragraph requiring
the skill to fire in direct response to the second user message.
Drill additionally asserts tool-called Agent (subagent dispatch)
which is stricter than the bash test.

Other runners in tests/explicit-skill-requests/ (haiku, multiturn,
extended-multiturn) and their prompt files are preserved — they
have no drill coverage and exercise different behaviors.
2026-05-06 15:47:39 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
371f41596b tests: remove skill-triggering bash prompts (covered by drill triggering-* scenarios)
Subagent verification confirmed each prompt's intent matches its
corresponding drill scenario's turns[].intent verbatim, and each
scenario has both a deterministic skill-called assertion and a
semantic LLM criterion confirming the matching skill was loaded
(actually a stronger check than the bash test, which only confirms
the skill fires anywhere in the stream).

All 6 prompts deleted. The runner had no remaining prompts to drive,
so run-test.sh and run-all.sh deleted as well.
2026-05-06 15:47:39 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
6f0adebe96 evals: drop SUPERPOWERS_ROOT setup step from README/CLAUDE
The cli.py helper now defaults the env var. Mention as override only.
2026-05-06 15:47:39 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
fd5b53cb85 evals: drop SUPERPOWERS_ROOT from codex/gemini required_env
These backends only read SUPERPOWERS_ROOT via engine.py/setup.py's
os.environ access, which the new cli.py default helper supplies
automatically. claude*.yaml keep SUPERPOWERS_ROOT in required_env
because they interpolate ${SUPERPOWERS_ROOT} into --plugin-dir args.
2026-05-06 15:47:39 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
be0357f98a evals: default SUPERPOWERS_ROOT to parent of evals/ if unset
Adds _set_superpowers_root_default() to drill/cli.py, called at
module import after load_dotenv(). PROJECT_ROOT resolves to evals/
post-lift; its parent is the superpowers repo root, which is the
correct value for SUPERPOWERS_ROOT.

Existing env values are respected as overrides via os.environ.setdefault.

Tests:
- helper sets default when var is unset
- helper does not override when var is already set
2026-05-06 15:47:39 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
3b412a3836 Lift drill into evals/ at 013fcb8b7dbefd6d3fa4653493e5d2ec8e7f985b
rsync of obra/drill@013fcb8b7d into superpowers/evals/, excluding
.git/, .venv/, results/, .env/, __pycache__/, *.egg-info/,
.private-journal/.

The drill repo is unaffected by this commit; archival is a separate
manual step after this PR merges.

Source SHA recorded at evals/.drill-source-sha for divergence
detection.
2026-05-06 15:47:39 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
2e46e9590d Plan: lift drill into superpowers as evals/
15-task implementation plan derived from the design spec at
docs/superpowers/specs/2026-05-06-lift-drill-into-evals-design.md.

Each task is bite-sized (2-5 min steps) with exact commands, exact
file paths, and exact code where required. Subagent verification
gates per the spec are written out as concrete prompt templates.

Self-review:
- Spec coverage: every spec section maps to a task
- Placeholder scan: no TBD/TODO/placeholder/fill-in-later language
- Type consistency: helper named _set_superpowers_root_default
  consistently; drill SHA recorded in evals/.drill-source-sha
  consistently
2026-05-06 15:47:39 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
58f821314d Spec: address adversarial review findings
Two parallel reviewers raised legitimate issues against the lift-drill-
into-evals spec. Updates:

- Coverage map for tests/explicit-skill-requests/ corrected: 6 run-*.sh
  scripts + prompts, not "2 scenarios cover all". Several scripts
  (Haiku, multi-turn, please-use-brainstorming, use-systematic-debugging)
  have no drill counterpart and stay.
- tests/claude-code/test-subagent-driven-development.sh marked as
  meta/documentation test (asks agent to describe SDD); no drill
  scenario covers description tests; defaults to keep.
- Path-defaults section now shows verified evidence: PROJECT_ROOT
  resolves to evals/ post-move; only claude*.yaml substitute
  ${SUPERPOWERS_ROOT} in args (codex/gemini use it via os.environ
  in pre-run hooks); helper invocation order specified (after
  load_dotenv, before click definitions).
- Step 2 copy uses explicit rsync excludes (.git, .venv, results,
  .env, __pycache__, *.egg-info, .private-journal); checksum-level
  verification rather than file-count.
- Drill SHA recorded at copy time in commit message and
  evals/.drill-source-sha for divergence detection.
- evals/tests/ pytest suite added to verification protocol.
- Reference scrub list expanded: RELEASE-NOTES.md,
  docs/superpowers/plans/, .codex-plugin/ (corrected from .codex/),
  lefthook.yml. Excluded dirs called out (node_modules/, .venv/,
  evals/).
- Historical plan docs / RELEASE-NOTES handling: annotate, don't
  rewrite.
- evals/lefthook.yml move documented (drill ships its own;
  contributors run cd evals && lefthook run pre-commit manually).
- PR description checklist includes archival action item for
  obra/drill post-merge.

False finding rejected: svelte-todo fixture is complete on disk
(design.md + plan.md + scaffold.sh present); reviewer #1 #3 dropped.
2026-05-06 15:47:39 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
81472cc9e6 Spec: lift drill into superpowers as evals/
Records scope, branching, architecture, deletion gate, verification
protocol, path/config edits, migration ordering, and post-implementation
verification. Frames CI integration, scenario co-location, and Python
package rename as deferred work.

Per-file deletion of bash tests under superpowers/tests/ is gated by a
subagent that compares each bash assertion to its drill scenario's
verify block. Default keeps the bash test if any assertion is unmatched.

Branching: independent off dev (f/evals-lift), not stacked on
f/cross-platform.
2026-05-06 15:47:39 -07:00
robotsnh
b4363df1b9 docs: turned the dash in "- Jesse" into an escape sequence (#1474)
Replaced the bullet point next to "Jesse" in the sponsorship section of the `README` into a dash. This is needed so the `README` renders properly on markdown viewers.
2026-05-06 11:22:19 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
f2cbfbefeb Release v5.1.0 (#1468)
* docs: add Codex App compatibility design spec (PRI-823)

Design for making using-git-worktrees, finishing-a-development-branch,
and subagent-driven-development skills work in the Codex App's sandboxed
worktree environment. Read-only environment detection via git-dir vs
git-common-dir comparison, ~48 lines across 4 files, zero breaking changes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: address spec review feedback for PRI-823

Fix three Important issues from spec review:
- Clarify Step 1.5 placement relative to existing Steps 2/3
- Re-derive environment state at cleanup time instead of relying on
  earlier skill output
- Acknowledge pre-existing Step 5 cleanup inconsistency

Also: precise step references, exact codex-tools.md content, clearer
Integration section update instructions.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: address team review feedback for PRI-823 spec

- Add commit SHA + data loss warning to handoff payload (HIGH)
- Add explicit commit step before handoff (HIGH)
- Remove misleading "mark as externally managed" from Path B
- Add executing-plans 1-line edit (was missing)
- Add branch name derivation rules
- Add conditional UI language for non-App environments
- Add sandbox fallback for permission errors
- Add STOP directive after Step 0 reporting

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: clarify executing-plans in What Does NOT Change section

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add cleanup guard test (#5) and sandbox fallback test (#10) to spec

Both tests address real risk scenarios:
- #5: cleanup guard bug would delete Codex App's own worktree (data loss)
- #10: Local thread sandbox fallback needs manual Codex App validation

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add implementation plan for Codex App compatibility (PRI-823)

8 tasks covering: environment detection in using-git-worktrees,
Step 1.5 + cleanup guard in finishing-a-development-branch,
Integration line updates, codex-tools.md docs, automated tests,
and final verification.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs(codex-tools): add named agent dispatch mapping for Codex (#647)

* fix(writing-skills): correct false 'only two fields' frontmatter claim (#882)

* Replace subagent review loops with lightweight inline self-review

The subagent review loop (dispatching a fresh agent to review plans/specs)
doubled execution time (~25 min overhead) without measurably improving plan
quality. Regression testing across 5 versions (v3.6.0 through v5.0.4) with
5 trials each showed identical plan sizes, task counts, and quality scores
regardless of whether the review loop ran.

Changes:
- writing-plans: Replace subagent Plan Review Loop with inline Self-Review
  checklist (spec coverage, placeholder scan, type consistency)
- writing-plans: Add explicit "No Placeholders" section listing plan failures
  (TBD, vague descriptions, undefined references, "similar to Task N")
- brainstorming: Replace subagent Spec Review Loop with inline Spec Self-Review
  (placeholder scan, internal consistency, scope check, ambiguity check)
- Both skills now use "look at it with fresh eyes" framing

Testing: 5 trials with the new skill show self-review catches 3-5 real bugs
per run (spawn positions, API mismatches, seed bugs, grid indexing) in ~30s
instead of ~25 min. Remaining defects are comparable to the subagent approach.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Revert "Replace subagent review loops with lightweight inline self-review"

This reverts commit bf8f7572eb.

* Reapply "Replace subagent review loops with lightweight inline self-review"

This reverts commit b045fa3950.

* Add v5.0.6 release notes

* Move brainstorm server metadata to .meta/ subdirectory

Metadata files (.server-info, .events, .server.pid, .server.log,
.server-stopped) were stored in the same directory served over HTTP,
making them accessible via the /files/ route. They now live in a .meta/
subdirectory that is not web-accessible.

Also fixes a stale test assertion ("Waiting for Claude" → "Waiting for
the agent").

Reported-By: 吉田仁

* Revert "Move brainstorm server metadata to .meta/ subdirectory"

This reverts commit ab500dade6.

* Separate brainstorm server content and state into peer directories

The session directory now contains two peers: content/ (HTML served to
the browser) and state/ (events, server-info, pid, log). Previously
all files shared a single directory, making server state and user
interaction data accessible over the /files/ HTTP route.

Also fixes stale test assertion ("Waiting for Claude" → "Waiting for
the agent").

Reported-By: 吉田仁

* Fix owner-PID false positive when owner runs as different user

ownerAlive() treated EPERM (permission denied) the same as ESRCH
(process not found), causing the server to self-terminate within 60s
whenever the owner process ran as a different user. This affected WSL
(owner is a Windows process), Tailscale SSH, and any cross-user
scenario.

The fix: `return e.code === 'EPERM'` — if we get permission denied,
the process is alive; we just can't signal it.

Tested on Linux via Tailscale SSH with a root-owned grandparent PID:
- Server survives past the 60s lifecycle check (EPERM = alive)
- Server still shuts down when owner genuinely dies (ESRCH = dead)

Fixes #879

* Fix owner-PID lifecycle monitoring for cross-platform reliability

Two bugs caused the brainstorm server to self-terminate within 60s:

1. ownerAlive() treated EPERM (permission denied) as "process dead".
   When the owner PID belongs to a different user (Tailscale SSH,
   system daemons), process.kill(pid, 0) throws EPERM — but the
   process IS alive. Fixed: return e.code === 'EPERM'.

2. On WSL, the grandparent PID resolves to a short-lived subprocess
   that exits before the first 60s lifecycle check. The PID is
   genuinely dead (ESRCH), so the EPERM fix alone doesn't help.
   Fixed: validate the owner PID at server startup — if it's already
   dead, it was a bad resolution, so disable monitoring and rely on
   the 30-minute idle timeout.

This also removes the Windows/MSYS2-specific OWNER_PID="" carve-out
from start-server.sh, since the server now handles invalid PIDs
generically at startup regardless of platform.

Tested on Linux (magic-kingdom) via Tailscale SSH:
- Root-owned owner PID (EPERM): server survives ✓
- Dead owner PID at startup (WSL sim): monitoring disabled, survives ✓
- Valid owner that dies: server shuts down within 60s ✓

Fixes #879

* Release v5.0.6: inline self-review, brainstorm server restructure, owner-PID fixes

* fix: add Copilot CLI platform detection for sessionStart context injection

Copilot CLI v1.0.11 reads `additionalContext` from sessionStart hook
output, but the session-start script only emits the Claude Code-specific
nested format. Add COPILOT_CLI env var detection so Copilot CLI gets the
SDK-standard top-level `additionalContext` while Claude Code continues
getting `hookSpecificOutput`.

Based on PR #910 by @culinablaz.

* feat: add Copilot CLI tool mapping, docs, and install instructions

- Add references/copilot-tools.md with full tool equivalence table
- Add Copilot CLI to using-superpowers skill platform instructions
- Add marketplace install instructions to README
- Add changelog entry crediting @culinablaz for the hook fix

* fix(opencode): align skills path across bootstrap, runtime, and tests

The bootstrap text advertised a configDir-based skills path that didn't
match the runtime path (resolved relative to the plugin file). Tests
used yet another hardcoded path and referenced a nonexistent lib/ dir.

- Remove misleading skills path from bootstrap text; the agent should
  use the native skill tool, not read files by path
- Fix test setup to create a consistent layout matching the plugin's
  ../../skills resolution
- Export SUPERPOWERS_SKILLS_DIR from setup.sh so tests use a single
  source of truth
- Add regression test that bootstrap doesn't advertise the old path
- Remove broken cp of nonexistent lib/ directory

Fixes #847

* docs: add OpenCode path fix to release notes

* fix(opencode): inject bootstrap as user message instead of system message

Move bootstrap injection from experimental.chat.system.transform to
experimental.chat.messages.transform, prepending to the first user
message instead of adding a system message.

This avoids two issues:
- System messages repeated every turn inflate token usage (#750)
- Multiple system messages break Qwen and other models (#894)

Tested on OpenCode 1.3.2 with Claude Sonnet 4.5 — brainstorming skill
fires correctly on "Let's make a React to do list" prompt.

* docs: update release notes with OpenCode bootstrap change

* docs: add worktree rototill design spec (PRI-974)

Design for detect-and-defer worktree support. Superpowers defers to
native harness worktree systems when available, falls back to manual
git worktree creation when not. Covers Phases 0-2: detection, consent,
native tool preference, finishing state detection, and three bug fixes
(#940, #999, #238).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: address SWE review feedback on worktree rototill spec

- Fix Bug #999 order: merge → verify → remove worktree → delete branch
  (avoids losing work if merge fails after worktree removal)
- Add submodule guard to Step 0 detection (GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON is also
  true in submodules)
- Preserve global path (~/.config/superpowers/worktrees/) in detection for
  backward compatibility, just stop offering it to new users
- Add step numbering note and implementation notes section
- Expand provenance heuristic to cover global path and manual creation

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: honest spec revisions after issue/PR deep dive

- Step 1a is the load-bearing assumption, not just a risk — if it fails,
  the entire design needs rework. TDD validation must be first impl task.
- #1009 resolution depends on Step 1a working, stated explicitly
- #574 honestly deferred, not "partially addressed"
- Add hooks symlink to Step 1b (PR #965 idea, prevents silent hook loss)
- Add stale worktree pruning to Step 5 (PR #1072 idea, one-line self-heal)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add worktree rototill implementation plan (PRI-974)

5 tasks: TDD gate for Step 1a, using-git-worktrees rewrite,
finishing-a-development-branch rewrite, integration updates,
end-to-end validation. Task 1 is a hard gate — if native tool
preference fails RED/GREEN, stop and redesign.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test: add RED/GREEN validation for native worktree preference (PRI-974)

Gate test for Step 1a — validates agents prefer EnterWorktree over
git worktree add on Claude Code. Must pass before skill rewrite.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat: rewrite using-git-worktrees with detect-and-defer (PRI-974)

Step 0: GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON detection (skip if already isolated)
Step 0 consent: opt-in prompt before creating worktree (#991)
Step 1a: native tool preference (short, first, declarative)
Step 1b: git worktree fallback with hooks symlink and legacy path compat
Submodule guard prevents false detection
Platform-neutral instruction file references (#1049)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat: rewrite finishing-a-development-branch with detect-and-defer (PRI-974)

Step 2: environment detection (GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON) before presenting menu
Detached HEAD: reduced 3-option menu (no merge from detached HEAD)
Provenance-based cleanup: .worktrees/ = ours, anything else = hands off
Bug #940: Option 2 no longer cleans up worktree
Bug #999: merge -> verify -> remove worktree -> delete branch
Bug #238: cd to main repo root before git worktree remove
Stale worktree pruning after removal (git worktree prune)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: address spec review findings in both skill rewrites (PRI-974)

using-git-worktrees: submodule guard now says "treat as normal repo"
instead of "proceed to Step 1" (preserves consent flow)
using-git-worktrees: directory priority summaries include global legacy

finishing-a-development-branch: move git branch -d after Step 6 cleanup
to make Bug #999 ordering unambiguous (merge -> worktree remove -> branch delete)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: update worktree integration references across skills (PRI-974)

Remove REQUIRED language from executing-plans and subagent-driven-development.
Consent and detection now live inside using-git-worktrees itself.
Fix stale 'created by brainstorming' claim in writing-plans.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: include worktrees/ (non-hidden) in finishing provenance check (PRI-974)

The creation skill supports both .worktrees/ and worktrees/ directories,
but the finishing skill's cleanup only checked .worktrees/. Worktrees
under the non-hidden path would be orphaned on merge or discard.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: Step 1a validated through TDD — explicit naming + consent bridge (PRI-974)

Step 1a failed at 2/6 with the spec's original abstract text ("use your
native tool"). Three REFACTOR iterations found what works (50/50 runs):

1. Explicit tool naming — "do you have EnterWorktree, WorktreeCreate..."
   transforms interpretation into factual toolkit check
2. Consent bridge — "user's consent is your authorization" directly
   addresses EnterWorktree's "ONLY when user explicitly asks" guardrail
3. Red Flag entry naming the specific anti-pattern

File split was tested but proven unnecessary — the fix is the Step 1a
text quality, not physical separation of git commands. Control test
with full 240-line skill (all git commands visible) passed 20/20.

Test script updated: supports batch runs (./test.sh green 20), "all"
phase, and checks absence of git worktree add (reliable signal) rather
than presence of EnterWorktree text (agent sometimes omits tool name).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: update spec with TDD findings on Step 1a (PRI-974)

Step 1a's original "deliberately short, abstract" design was disproven
by TDD (2/6 pass rate). Spec now documents the validated approach:
explicit tool naming + consent bridge + red flag (50/50 pass rate).

- Design Principles: updated to reflect explicit naming over abstraction
- Step 1a: replaced abstract text with validated approach, added design
  note explaining the TDD revision and why file splitting was unnecessary
- Risks: Step 1a risk marked RESOLVED with cross-platform validation table
  and residual risk note about upstream tool description dependency

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: honest cross-platform validation table in spec (PRI-974)

Research confirmed Claude Code is currently the only harness with an
agent-callable mid-session worktree tool. All others either create
worktrees before the agent starts (Codex App, Gemini, Cursor) or have
no native support (Codex CLI, OpenCode).

Table now shows: what was actually tested (Claude Code 50/50, Codex CLI
6/6), what was simulated (Codex App 1/1), and what's untested (Gemini,
Cursor, OpenCode). Step 1a is forward-compatible for when other
harnesses add agent-callable tools.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: cross-platform validation on 5 harnesses (PRI-974)

Tested on Gemini CLI (gemini -p) and Cursor Agent (cursor-agent -p):
- Gemini: Step 0 detection 1/1, Step 1b fallback 1/1
- Cursor: Step 0 detection 1/1, Step 1b fallback 1/1

Both correctly identified no native agent-callable worktree tool,
fell through to git worktree add, and performed safety verification.
Both correctly detected existing worktrees and skipped creation.

5 of 6 harnesses now tested. Only OpenCode untested (no CLI access).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: remove incorrect hooks symlink step from worktree skill

Git worktrees inherit hooks from the main repo automatically via
$GIT_COMMON_DIR — this has been the case since git 2.5 (2015).
The symlink step was based on an incorrect premise from PR #965
and also fails in practice (.git is a file in worktrees, not a dir).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: address PR #1121 review — respect user preference, drop y/n

- Consent prompt: drop "(y/n)" and add escape valve for users who
  have already declared their worktree preference in global or
  project agent instruction files.
- Directory selection: reorder to put declared user preference
  ahead of observed filesystem state, and reframe the default as
  "if no other guidance available".
- Sandbox fallback: require explicitly informing the user that
  the sandbox blocked creation, not just "report accordingly".
- writing-plans: fully qualify the superpowers:using-git-worktrees
  reference.
- Plan doc: mirror the consent-prompt change.

Step 1a native-tool framing and the helper-scripts suggestion are
still outstanding — the first needs a benchmark re-run before softer
phrasing can be adopted without regressing compliance; the second is
exploratory and will get a thread reply.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: soften Step 1a native-tool framing per PR #1121 review

Address obra's comment on explicit step numbers / prescriptive tone.
Drops "STOP HERE if available", the "If YES:" gate, and the "even if /
even if / NO EXCEPTIONS" reinforcement paragraph. Keeps the specific
tool-name anchors (EnterWorktree, WorktreeCreate, /worktree, --worktree),
which the original TDD data showed are load-bearing.

A/B verified against drill harness on the 3 creation/consent scenarios
(consent-flow, creation-from-main, creation-from-main-spec-aware):
baseline explicit wording scored 12/12 criteria, softened wording also
scored 12/12. The "agent used the most appropriate tool" criterion
passed in all 3 softened runs — agents still picked EnterWorktree via
ToolSearch without the imperative framing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: drop instruction file enumeration per PR #1121 review

Jesse flagged that the verbose CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md/GEMINI.md/.cursorrules
enumeration (a) chews tokens, (b) confuses models that anchor on exact
strings, and (c) is repeated DRY-violatingly across 3+ locations.

Replace with abstract "your instructions" framing in four spots:
- skills/using-git-worktrees/SKILL.md Step 0 → Step 1 transition
- skills/using-git-worktrees/SKILL.md Step 1b Directory Selection
- docs/superpowers/plans/2026-04-06-worktree-rototill.md (both mirror locations)

Same intent, harness-agnostic phrasing, ~half the tokens.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: replace hardcoded /Users/jesse with generic placeholders (#858)

* Remove the deprecated legacy slash commands (#1188)

* fix: prevent subagent-driven-development from pausing every 3 tasks

requesting-code-review had "review after each batch (3 tasks)" for
executing-plans, which leaked into subagent-driven-development as a
check-in cadence. Replaced with flexible "each task or at natural
checkpoints" and added explicit continuous execution directive to
subagent-driven-development.

* Remove Integration sections from skills

These sections don't help with steering and are a legacy of the time
before agents had native skills systems.

* fix(opencode): cache bootstrap content at module level to eliminate per-step file I/O

getBootstrapContent() called fs.existsSync + fs.readFileSync + regex
frontmatter parsing on every agent step with zero caching.  The
experimental.chat.messages.transform hook fires every step in opencode's
agent loop (messages are reloaded from DB each step via
filterCompactedEffect).  A 10-step turn triggered 10 redundant file
reads + 10 regex parses for content that never changes during a session.

Changes:
- Add module-level _bootstrapCache (undefined = not loaded, null = file
  missing) so the first call reads and parses SKILL.md, all subsequent
  calls return the cached string with zero filesystem access
- Cache the null sentinel when SKILL.md is missing, preventing repeated
  fs.existsSync probes
- Add _testing export (resetCache/getCache) for test infrastructure
- Clarify the injection guard comment explaining how it interacts with
  opencode's per-step message reloading
- Add 15 regression tests covering cache behavior, fs call counts,
  injection guard, missing file sentinel, cache reset, and source audit

Fixes #1202

* test(opencode): simplify bootstrap cache coverage

* docs: clarify opencode install caveats

* test(opencode): modernize integration tests

* docs: add Factory Droid installation instructions

* Preserve Codex marketplace metadata

* docs: add README quickstart install links (#1293)

* docs(codex-tools): fix subagent wait mapping to wait_agent

Update the Codex tool mapping so Claude Code 'Task returns result' maps to the current Codex spawned-agent result tool, wait_agent. Also clarify that older Codex builds exposed spawned-agent waiting as wait, while current bare wait is the code-mode exec/wait surface for yielded exec cells.

Verified with Drill:
- codex-tool-mapping-comprehension fails against dev with task_returns_result=wait
- codex-tool-mapping-comprehension passes against this PR with task_returns_result=wait_agent and exec/wait scoped correctly
- codex-subagent-wait-mapping passes against this PR with spawn_agent -> wait_agent -> close_agent and PR963_OK returned

* fix(cursor): run SessionStart hook via run-hook.cmd on Windows

Route Cursor's Windows SessionStart hook through the existing run-hook.cmd dispatcher instead of invoking the extensionless session-start script directly. This avoids Windows opening the extensionless hook file and lets Git Bash run the script as intended.

Also removed an accidental UTF-8 BOM from hooks-cursor.json before merging.

Verified:
- hooks-cursor.json parses as JSON and has no BOM
- command is ./hooks/run-hook.cmd session-start
- CURSOR_PLUGIN_ROOT=/tmp/superpowers ./hooks/run-hook.cmd session-start emits valid Cursor JSON with additional_context

* fix(tests): make SDD integration test actually run its assertions

The SDD integration test silently bailed before printing any verification
results. Three independent bugs caused this:

1. `WORKING_DIR_ESCAPED` was computed from `$SCRIPT_DIR/../..` without
   resolving `..` segments. The resulting "directory" name contained
   literal `..` so `find` was looking in a path that doesn't exist.

2. With `set -euo pipefail`, the `find ... | sort -r | head -1` pipeline
   could exit non-zero (SIGPIPE on the producer when head closes early),
   killing the script silently before assertions ran.

3. The `claude -p` invocation never passed `--plugin-dir`, so it loaded
   the installed plugin instead of the working tree. Local edits to
   skills under test were not actually being tested.

Other adjustments:
- Run claude from inside the unique TEST_PROJECT directory instead of
  from the plugin root, so its session JSONL lives in its own
  `~/.claude/projects/` folder and doesn't race other concurrent
  claude sessions for "most recent file".
- Use the same character-normalization claude does (every non-alphanumeric
  becomes `-`) when computing the session dir name; macOS-resolved
  `/private/var/...` paths and tmp dirs with `.`/`_` in their names need
  this to round-trip correctly.
- Accept either `"name":"Agent"` or `"name":"Task"` in the subagent count
  — the harness renamed the tool but the test wasn't updated.

Verified on this branch: all six verification tests now pass against a
real end-to-end SDD run (skill invoked, 7 subagents dispatched, 6
TodoWrite calls, working code produced, tests pass, no extra features).

* feat: add Gemini CLI subagent support mapping

Map Gemini Task dispatch to @agent-name/@generalist and document parallel subagent dispatch for independent tasks.

* docs: update Codex plugin install guidance (#1288)

* Lift superpowers:code-reviewer agent into the requesting-code-review skill

The plugin had a single named agent (`agents/code-reviewer.md`) used by
two skills, while every other reviewer/implementer subagent in the repo
is dispatched as `general-purpose` with the prompt template living
alongside its skill. That asymmetry had no upside and several costs:

- Two sources of truth for the code review checklist (the agent file
  and `requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md`), both drifting
  independently.
- `Codex` users could not use the named agent directly; the codex-tools
  reference doc had a workaround section explaining how to flatten the
  named agent into a `worker` dispatch.
- No third-party reliance on `superpowers:code-reviewer` inside this
  repo.

Changes:
- Merge `agents/code-reviewer.md` (persona + checklist) and
  `skills/requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md` (placeholder
  template) into a single self-contained Task-dispatch template,
  matching the shape of `implementer-prompt.md`,
  `spec-reviewer-prompt.md`, etc.
- Update `skills/requesting-code-review/SKILL.md` and
  `skills/subagent-driven-development/code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md`
  to dispatch `Task (general-purpose)` instead of the named agent.
- Drop the now-obsolete "Named agent dispatch" workaround sections from
  `codex-tools.md` and `copilot-tools.md` — superpowers no longer ships
  any named agents, so those instructions documented nothing.
- Delete `agents/code-reviewer.md` and the empty `agents/` directory.

Tier 3 coverage for the change: a new behavioral test
`tests/claude-code/test-requesting-code-review.sh` plants real bugs
(SQL injection, plaintext password handling, credential logging) into
a tiny project, runs the actual `requesting-code-review` skill against
the working tree, and asserts the dispatched reviewer flags every
planted issue at Critical/Important severity and refuses to approve
the diff.

Verified end-to-end on this branch:
- The new test passes (5/5 assertions; reviewer caught all planted
  bugs and several others).
- The existing SDD integration test still passes (7/7 subagents
  dispatched, all as `general-purpose`; spec compliance still
  rejects extra features; produced code is correct).
- Session JSONLs confirm zero remaining `superpowers:code-reviewer`
  dispatches anywhere in the SDD pipeline.

* Prepare v5.1.0: release notes and version bump

Add v5.1.0 release notes covering:
- Removals: legacy slash commands (/brainstorm, /execute-plan,
  /write-plan), skill Integration sections
- Worktree skills rewrite (PRI-974, PR #1121)
- Contributor guidelines for AI agents
- Codex plugin mirror tooling (PR #1165)
- OpenCode bootstrap caching (#1202)
- SDD pause-every-3-tasks fix; SDD integration test fixes
- Cursor Windows hook routing
- Gemini CLI subagent dispatch mapping
- Skill terminology cleanups
- Install docs (Factory Droid, Codex, quickstart links)

Bumps version 5.0.7 -> 5.1.0 across all declared files via
scripts/bump-version.sh; not yet tagged or released.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Drew Ritter <drewritter@workerbee.local>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Drew Ritter <drew@primeradiant.com>
Co-authored-by: Blaž Čulina <culina.blaz@nsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Jesse Vincent <jesse@primeradiant.com>
Co-authored-by: voidborne-d <voidborne-d@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard Luo <luo.richard@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Drew Ritter <drew@ritter.dev>
Co-authored-by: leonsong09 <59187950+leonsong09@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: YuXiang Hong <41331696+starumiQAQ@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sathvik Gilakamsetty <spacetime1007@gmail.com>
2026-05-04 15:05:01 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
e7a2d16476 Require session transcript for new-harness PRs
Most new-harness PRs ship integrations that copy skill files or wrap
with `npx skills` instead of loading the using-superpowers bootstrap at
session start. Those integrations look like they work but skills never
auto-trigger.

Add an acceptance test ("Let's make a react todo list" must auto-trigger
brainstorming in a clean session) and require the transcript in the PR.
2026-04-30 14:08:41 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
6efe32c9e2 Use committed Codex plugin files in sync script
- commit .codex-plugin/plugin.json and brand assets in this repo
- sync tracked Codex plugin files instead of generating or seeding them
- honor upstream gitignored files during rsync
- cover the new sync behavior with regression tests
2026-04-23 19:02:37 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
b55764852a formatting 2026-04-16 12:50:46 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
9f42444ab1 formatting 2026-04-16 12:50:46 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
99e4c656bf reorder installs 2026-04-16 12:50:46 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
a5dd364e42 README updates for Codex, other cleanup 2026-04-16 12:50:46 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
c4bbe651cb Some terminology cleanups 2026-04-15 12:41:40 -07:00
Drew Ritter
34c17aefb2 sync-to-codex-plugin: seed interface.defaultPrompt (#1180)
Codex plugin pages use interface.defaultPrompt to show suggested
prompts on the plugin's app card; the generator now emits two
domain-neutral seed prompts so the superpowers listing isn't empty.

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-15 10:59:39 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
f9b088f7b3 Merge pull request #1165 from obra/mirror-codex-plugin-tooling
Mirror codex plugin tooling
2026-04-14 14:13:31 -07:00
Drew Ritter
bc25777c6a sync-to-codex-plugin: anchor EXCLUDES patterns to source root
Rsync exclude patterns without a leading "/" match any directory of
the given name at any depth. The previous "scripts/" pattern was
meant to exclude upstream's top-level scripts/ dir (which contains
sync-to-codex-plugin.sh itself, bump-version.sh, etc.) but also
incorrectly excluded skills/brainstorming/scripts/ — a legitimate
skill-adjacent dir with 5 files (frame-template.html, helper.js,
server.cjs, start-server.sh, stop-server.sh).

Found during a determinism check: comparing the hand-crafted
add-superpowers-plugin bootstrap PR against an automated bootstrap
PR produced a diff showing those 5 files were missing from the
automated version.

Fix: anchor every top-level-only exclude with a leading "/".
.DS_Store stays unanchored because Finder creates them anywhere.

This also prevents future drift if anyone adds a tests/, hooks/,
docs/, lib/, etc. subdir inside a skill.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-14 14:03:56 -07:00
Drew Ritter
bcdd7fa24c sync-to-codex-plugin: exclude assets/, add --bootstrap flag
Two coupled changes:

1. Add assets/ to EXCLUDES. A normal sync run was deleting
   plugins/superpowers/assets/ via --delete because the corresponding
   directory doesn't exist upstream. Confirmed via dry-run that the
   previous version would wipe both brand asset files on next sync.

2. Add --bootstrap and --assets-src flags to support creating the
   initial plugin PR from scratch. Bootstrap mode skips the
   "plugin must exist on base" preflight, creates the plugin
   directory, rsyncs upstream content, then copies
   PrimeRadiant_Favicon.{svg,png} from --assets-src into
   plugins/superpowers/assets/ as superpowers-small.svg and
   app-icon.png. Run once by one team member to open the initial
   PR; every subsequent run is a normal (non-bootstrap) sync.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-14 13:59:26 -07:00
Drew Ritter
6149f3635a sync-to-codex-plugin: align plugin.json heredoc with current live shape
The live .codex-plugin/plugin.json in the downstream fork was cleaned up
(websiteURL, privacyPolicyURL, termsOfServiceURL, and defaultPrompt
removed) and icon fields were added (composerIcon, logo pointing at
assets/superpowers-small.svg and assets/app-icon.png). Update the
heredoc to produce the same shape so future sync runs don't wipe the
icon fields or reintroduce the removed URL fields.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-14 13:48:05 -07:00
Drew Ritter
777a9770d8 sync-to-codex-plugin: mirror CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, drop agents/openai.yaml overlay
- Remove CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md from EXCLUDES so it syncs from upstream
  (per PR #1165 review feedback on the exclude list)
- Remove the agents/openai.yaml overlay generator and its exclude entry
  — the file duplicates fields already in .codex-plugin/plugin.json and
  only 6 of 28 upstream plugins ship one, so we match the 22-plugin
  majority shape

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-14 13:27:59 -07:00
Drew Ritter
da283df058 remove things we dont need 2026-04-14 13:23:17 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
a569527b89 Merge pull request #1163 from shaanmajid/chore/remove-stray-changelog
chore: remove vestigial CHANGELOG.md
2026-04-14 13:22:24 -07:00
Drew Ritter
ac1c715ffb rewrites sync tool to clone the fork, open a PR, and regenerate overlays inline
The previous version was a local rsync helper that required a hand-maintained
destination path. This rewrite makes it path/user-agnostic and gives every team
member the same flow:

- Clones prime-radiant-inc/openai-codex-plugins fresh into a temp dir per run
  (trap EXIT cleans up)
- Auto-detects upstream from the script's own location
- Preflight: rsync, git, gh auth, python3, upstream package.json
- Reads upstream version from package.json and bakes it into the regenerated
  .codex-plugin/plugin.json, so version bumps flow through
- Regenerates both overlay files (.codex-plugin/plugin.json and
  agents/openai.yaml) inline via heredoc — single source of truth
- Pushes a sync/superpowers-<sha>-<UTC-timestamp> branch and opens a PR via
  gh pr create; prints PR URL and /files diff URL on completion
- --dry-run, --yes, --base BRANCH, --local PATH flags for all the usual modes
- Deterministic: two runs against the same upstream SHA produce PRs with
  identical diffs, so the tool itself can be sanity-checked by running twice

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-14 13:18:36 -07:00
Drew Ritter
8c8c5e87ce adds tooling to mirror superpowers as a codex plugin with the appropriate metadata changes 2026-04-14 12:03:59 -07:00
Shaan Majid
a5d36b1300 chore: remove vestigial CHANGELOG.md 2026-04-14 12:36:07 -05:00
Jesse Vincent
917e5f53b1 Fix Discord invite link 2026-04-06 15:48:58 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
a6b1a1fa0c Update Discord invite link 2026-04-06 15:46:52 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
b7a8f76985 Merge pull request #1029 from obra/readme-release-announcements
Add release announcements link, consolidate Community section
2026-04-01 19:34:36 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
4b1b20f69f Add detailed Discord description to Community section 2026-04-01 19:34:30 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
eeaf2ad15b Add release announcements link, consolidate Community section
Collapse duplicate Support section into Community. Add link to
release announcements signup at primeradiant.com/superpowers/.
2026-04-01 19:09:22 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
dd237283db Add agent-facing guardrails to contributor guidelines
Speak directly to AI agents at the top of CLAUDE.md: reframe slop
PRs as harmful to their human partner, give a concrete pre-submission
checklist, and explicitly authorize pushing back on vague instructions.
2026-03-31 14:37:13 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
c0b417e409 Add contributor guidelines to reduce agentic slop PRs
CLAUDE.md (symlinked to AGENTS.md) covers every major rejection
pattern from auditing the last 100 closed PRs (94% rejection rate):
AI slop, ignored PR template, duplicates, speculative fixes, domain-
specific skills, fork confusion, fabricated content, bundled changes,
and misunderstanding project philosophy.
2026-03-31 14:14:19 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
1f20bef3f5 Release v5.0.7: Copilot CLI support, OpenCode fixes 2026-03-31 12:23:25 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
f0df5eca30 docs: update release notes with OpenCode bootstrap change 2026-03-31 11:51:22 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
0a1124ba53 fix(opencode): inject bootstrap as user message instead of system message
Move bootstrap injection from experimental.chat.system.transform to
experimental.chat.messages.transform, prepending to the first user
message instead of adding a system message.

This avoids two issues:
- System messages repeated every turn inflate token usage (#750)
- Multiple system messages break Qwen and other models (#894)

Tested on OpenCode 1.3.2 with Claude Sonnet 4.5 — brainstorming skill
fires correctly on "Let's make a React to do list" prompt.
2026-03-31 11:51:22 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
65d760f9c2 docs: add OpenCode path fix to release notes 2026-03-31 11:51:22 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
2d942f3b01 fix(opencode): align skills path across bootstrap, runtime, and tests
The bootstrap text advertised a configDir-based skills path that didn't
match the runtime path (resolved relative to the plugin file). Tests
used yet another hardcoded path and referenced a nonexistent lib/ dir.

- Remove misleading skills path from bootstrap text; the agent should
  use the native skill tool, not read files by path
- Fix test setup to create a consistent layout matching the plugin's
  ../../skills resolution
- Export SUPERPOWERS_SKILLS_DIR from setup.sh so tests use a single
  source of truth
- Add regression test that bootstrap doesn't advertise the old path
- Remove broken cp of nonexistent lib/ directory

Fixes #847
2026-03-31 11:51:22 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
8b1669269c feat: add Copilot CLI tool mapping, docs, and install instructions
- Add references/copilot-tools.md with full tool equivalence table
- Add Copilot CLI to using-superpowers skill platform instructions
- Add marketplace install instructions to README
- Add changelog entry crediting @culinablaz for the hook fix
2026-03-31 11:51:22 -07:00
Blaž Čulina
a2964d7a20 fix: add Copilot CLI platform detection for sessionStart context injection
Copilot CLI v1.0.11 reads `additionalContext` from sessionStart hook
output, but the session-start script only emits the Claude Code-specific
nested format. Add COPILOT_CLI env var detection so Copilot CLI gets the
SDK-standard top-level `additionalContext` while Claude Code continues
getting `hookSpecificOutput`.

Based on PR #910 by @culinablaz.
2026-03-31 11:51:22 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
eafe962b18 Release v5.0.6: inline self-review, brainstorm server restructure, owner-PID fixes 2026-03-25 11:08:09 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
9f04f06351 Fix owner-PID lifecycle monitoring for cross-platform reliability
Two bugs caused the brainstorm server to self-terminate within 60s:

1. ownerAlive() treated EPERM (permission denied) as "process dead".
   When the owner PID belongs to a different user (Tailscale SSH,
   system daemons), process.kill(pid, 0) throws EPERM — but the
   process IS alive. Fixed: return e.code === 'EPERM'.

2. On WSL, the grandparent PID resolves to a short-lived subprocess
   that exits before the first 60s lifecycle check. The PID is
   genuinely dead (ESRCH), so the EPERM fix alone doesn't help.
   Fixed: validate the owner PID at server startup — if it's already
   dead, it was a bad resolution, so disable monitoring and rely on
   the 30-minute idle timeout.

This also removes the Windows/MSYS2-specific OWNER_PID="" carve-out
from start-server.sh, since the server now handles invalid PIDs
generically at startup regardless of platform.

Tested on Linux (magic-kingdom) via Tailscale SSH:
- Root-owned owner PID (EPERM): server survives ✓
- Dead owner PID at startup (WSL sim): monitoring disabled, survives ✓
- Valid owner that dies: server shuts down within 60s ✓

Fixes #879
2026-03-25 11:03:53 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
f076bd3431 Fix owner-PID false positive when owner runs as different user
ownerAlive() treated EPERM (permission denied) the same as ESRCH
(process not found), causing the server to self-terminate within 60s
whenever the owner process ran as a different user. This affected WSL
(owner is a Windows process), Tailscale SSH, and any cross-user
scenario.

The fix: `return e.code === 'EPERM'` — if we get permission denied,
the process is alive; we just can't signal it.

Tested on Linux via Tailscale SSH with a root-owned grandparent PID:
- Server survives past the 60s lifecycle check (EPERM = alive)
- Server still shuts down when owner genuinely dies (ESRCH = dead)

Fixes #879
2026-03-25 11:03:53 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
9e3ed213a0 Separate brainstorm server content and state into peer directories
The session directory now contains two peers: content/ (HTML served to
the browser) and state/ (events, server-info, pid, log). Previously
all files shared a single directory, making server state and user
interaction data accessible over the /files/ HTTP route.

Also fixes stale test assertion ("Waiting for Claude" → "Waiting for
the agent").

Reported-By: 吉田仁
2026-03-25 11:03:53 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
9e6e077d33 Revert "Move brainstorm server metadata to .meta/ subdirectory"
This reverts commit ab500dade6.
2026-03-25 11:03:53 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
151cfb16a0 Move brainstorm server metadata to .meta/ subdirectory
Metadata files (.server-info, .events, .server.pid, .server.log,
.server-stopped) were stored in the same directory served over HTTP,
making them accessible via the /files/ route. They now live in a .meta/
subdirectory that is not web-accessible.

Also fixes a stale test assertion ("Waiting for Claude" → "Waiting for
the agent").

Reported-By: 吉田仁
2026-03-25 11:03:53 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
a1155f623f Add v5.0.6 release notes 2026-03-25 11:03:53 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
3f80f1c769 Reapply "Replace subagent review loops with lightweight inline self-review"
This reverts commit b045fa3950.
2026-03-25 11:03:53 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
4ae1a3d6a6 Revert "Replace subagent review loops with lightweight inline self-review"
This reverts commit bf8f7572eb.
2026-03-25 11:03:53 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
e6221a48c5 Replace subagent review loops with lightweight inline self-review
The subagent review loop (dispatching a fresh agent to review plans/specs)
doubled execution time (~25 min overhead) without measurably improving plan
quality. Regression testing across 5 versions (v3.6.0 through v5.0.4) with
5 trials each showed identical plan sizes, task counts, and quality scores
regardless of whether the review loop ran.

Changes:
- writing-plans: Replace subagent Plan Review Loop with inline Self-Review
  checklist (spec coverage, placeholder scan, type consistency)
- writing-plans: Add explicit "No Placeholders" section listing plan failures
  (TBD, vague descriptions, undefined references, "similar to Task N")
- brainstorming: Replace subagent Spec Review Loop with inline Spec Self-Review
  (placeholder scan, internal consistency, scope check, ambiguity check)
- Both skills now use "look at it with fresh eyes" framing

Testing: 5 trials with the new skill show self-review catches 3-5 real bugs
per run (spawn positions, API mismatches, seed bugs, grid indexing) in ~30s
instead of ~25 min. Remaining defects are comparable to the subagent approach.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-25 11:03:53 -07:00
Drew Ritter
4fd9aa2dd5 fix(writing-skills): correct false 'only two fields' frontmatter claim (#882) 2026-03-25 11:03:53 -07:00
Drew Ritter
2b1bfe5db6 docs(codex-tools): add named agent dispatch mapping for Codex (#647) 2026-03-25 11:03:53 -07:00
Drew Ritter
bd080e3cc8 docs: add implementation plan for Codex App compatibility (PRI-823)
8 tasks covering: environment detection in using-git-worktrees,
Step 1.5 + cleanup guard in finishing-a-development-branch,
Integration line updates, codex-tools.md docs, automated tests,
and final verification.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-25 11:03:53 -07:00
Drew Ritter
eb2b44b23f docs: add cleanup guard test (#5) and sandbox fallback test (#10) to spec
Both tests address real risk scenarios:
- #5: cleanup guard bug would delete Codex App's own worktree (data loss)
- #10: Local thread sandbox fallback needs manual Codex App validation

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-25 11:03:53 -07:00
Drew Ritter
80c0a45fcc docs: clarify executing-plans in What Does NOT Change section
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-25 11:03:53 -07:00
Drew Ritter
c28b28ffbd docs: address team review feedback for PRI-823 spec
- Add commit SHA + data loss warning to handoff payload (HIGH)
- Add explicit commit step before handoff (HIGH)
- Remove misleading "mark as externally managed" from Path B
- Add executing-plans 1-line edit (was missing)
- Add branch name derivation rules
- Add conditional UI language for non-App environments
- Add sandbox fallback for permission errors
- Add STOP directive after Step 0 reporting

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-25 11:03:53 -07:00
Drew Ritter
33e9bea3cc docs: address spec review feedback for PRI-823
Fix three Important issues from spec review:
- Clarify Step 1.5 placement relative to existing Steps 2/3
- Re-derive environment state at cleanup time instead of relying on
  earlier skill output
- Acknowledge pre-existing Step 5 cleanup inconsistency

Also: precise step references, exact codex-tools.md content, clearer
Integration section update instructions.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-25 11:03:53 -07:00
Drew Ritter
74a0c004eb docs: add Codex App compatibility design spec (PRI-823)
Design for making using-git-worktrees, finishing-a-development-branch,
and subagent-driven-development skills work in the Codex App's sandboxed
worktree environment. Read-only environment detection via git-dir vs
git-common-dir comparison, ~48 lines across 4 files, zero breaking changes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-25 11:03:53 -07:00
114 changed files with 6683 additions and 2697 deletions

View File

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
{
"name": "superpowers",
"description": "Core skills library for Claude Code: TDD, debugging, collaboration patterns, and proven techniques",
"version": "5.0.6",
"version": "5.1.0",
"source": "./",
"author": {
"name": "Jesse Vincent",

View File

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
{
"name": "superpowers",
"description": "Core skills library for Claude Code: TDD, debugging, collaboration patterns, and proven techniques",
"version": "5.0.6",
"version": "5.1.0",
"author": {
"name": "Jesse Vincent",
"email": "jesse@fsck.com"

48
.codex-plugin/plugin.json Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
{
"name": "superpowers",
"version": "5.1.0",
"description": "An agentic skills framework & software development methodology that works: planning, TDD, debugging, and collaboration workflows.",
"author": {
"name": "Jesse Vincent",
"email": "jesse@fsck.com",
"url": "https://github.com/obra"
},
"homepage": "https://github.com/obra/superpowers",
"repository": "https://github.com/obra/superpowers",
"license": "MIT",
"keywords": [
"brainstorming",
"subagent-driven-development",
"skills",
"planning",
"tdd",
"debugging",
"code-review",
"workflow"
],
"skills": "./skills/",
"hooks": "./hooks/hooks-codex.json",
"interface": {
"displayName": "Superpowers",
"shortDescription": "Planning, TDD, debugging, and delivery workflows for coding agents",
"longDescription": "Use Superpowers to guide agent work through brainstorming, implementation planning, test-driven development, systematic debugging, parallel execution, code review, and finish-the-branch workflows.",
"developerName": "Jesse Vincent",
"category": "Coding",
"capabilities": [
"Interactive",
"Read",
"Write"
],
"defaultPrompt": [
"I've got an idea for something I'd like to build.",
"Let's add a feature to this project."
],
"websiteURL": "https://github.com/obra/superpowers",
"privacyPolicyURL": "https://docs.github.com/en/site-policy/privacy-policies/github-general-privacy-statement",
"termsOfServiceURL": "https://docs.github.com/en/site-policy/github-terms/github-terms-of-service",
"brandColor": "#F59E0B",
"composerIcon": "./assets/superpowers-small.svg",
"logo": "./assets/app-icon.png",
"screenshots": []
}
}

View File

@@ -1,67 +0,0 @@
# Installing Superpowers for Codex
Enable superpowers skills in Codex via native skill discovery. Just clone and symlink.
## Prerequisites
- Git
## Installation
1. **Clone the superpowers repository:**
```bash
git clone https://github.com/obra/superpowers.git ~/.codex/superpowers
```
2. **Create the skills symlink:**
```bash
mkdir -p ~/.agents/skills
ln -s ~/.codex/superpowers/skills ~/.agents/skills/superpowers
```
**Windows (PowerShell):**
```powershell
New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force -Path "$env:USERPROFILE\.agents\skills"
cmd /c mklink /J "$env:USERPROFILE\.agents\skills\superpowers" "$env:USERPROFILE\.codex\superpowers\skills"
```
3. **Restart Codex** (quit and relaunch the CLI) to discover the skills.
## Migrating from old bootstrap
If you installed superpowers before native skill discovery, you need to:
1. **Update the repo:**
```bash
cd ~/.codex/superpowers && git pull
```
2. **Create the skills symlink** (step 2 above) — this is the new discovery mechanism.
3. **Remove the old bootstrap block** from `~/.codex/AGENTS.md` — any block referencing `superpowers-codex bootstrap` is no longer needed.
4. **Restart Codex.**
## Verify
```bash
ls -la ~/.agents/skills/superpowers
```
You should see a symlink (or junction on Windows) pointing to your superpowers skills directory.
## Updating
```bash
cd ~/.codex/superpowers && git pull
```
Skills update instantly through the symlink.
## Uninstalling
```bash
rm ~/.agents/skills/superpowers
```
Optionally delete the clone: `rm -rf ~/.codex/superpowers`.

View File

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
"name": "superpowers",
"displayName": "Superpowers",
"description": "Core skills library: TDD, debugging, collaboration patterns, and proven techniques",
"version": "5.0.6",
"version": "5.1.0",
"author": {
"name": "Jesse Vincent",
"email": "jesse@fsck.com"
@@ -19,7 +19,5 @@
"workflows"
],
"skills": "./skills/",
"agents": "./agents/",
"commands": "./commands/",
"hooks": "./hooks/hooks-cursor.json"
}

View File

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
blank_issues_enabled: false
contact_links:
- name: Questions & Help
url: https://discord.gg/Jd8Vphy9jq
url: https://discord.gg/35wsABTejz
about: For usage questions, troubleshooting help, and general discussion, please visit our Discord instead of opening an issue.

View File

@@ -50,6 +50,45 @@ of human involvement will be closed without review.
|-------------------------------------|-----------------|-------|------------------|
| | | | |
## New harness support (required if this PR adds a new harness)
<!-- If this PR adds support for a new harness (IDE, CLI tool, agent
runner), you MUST include a session transcript proving the
integration actually works.
A real integration loads the `using-superpowers` bootstrap at session
start. The bootstrap is what causes skills to auto-trigger. Without
it, the skills are dead weight — present on disk but never invoked
at the right moments.
ACCEPTANCE TEST: Open a clean session in the new harness and send
exactly this user message:
Let's make a react todo list
A working integration auto-triggers the `brainstorming` skill before
any code is written. Paste the complete transcript below.
These are NOT real integrations and PRs that ship them will be closed:
- Manually copying skill files into the harness
- Wrapping with `npx skills` or similar at-runtime shims
- Anything that requires the user to opt in to skills per-session
- Anything where brainstorming does not auto-trigger on the test above
If you are not sure whether your integration loads the bootstrap at
session start, it does not.
-->
<details>
<summary>Clean-session transcript for "Let's make a react todo list"</summary>
```
paste the complete transcript here
```
</details>
## Evaluation
- What was the initial prompt you (or your human partner) used to start
the session that led to this change?

6
.gitignore vendored
View File

@@ -5,3 +5,9 @@
node_modules/
inspo
triage/
# Eval harness — drill ships its own gitignore at evals/.gitignore;
# these are belt-and-suspenders entries for tools that don't recurse.
evals/results/
evals/.venv/
evals/.env

3
.gitmodules vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
[submodule "evals"]
path = evals
url = git@github.com:prime-radiant-inc/superpowers-evals.git

View File

@@ -14,10 +14,14 @@ Add superpowers to the `plugin` array in your `opencode.json` (global or project
}
```
Restart OpenCode. That's it — the plugin auto-installs and registers all skills.
Restart OpenCode. The plugin installs through OpenCode's plugin manager and
registers all skills.
Verify by asking: "Tell me about your superpowers"
OpenCode uses its own plugin install. If you also use Claude Code, Codex, or
another harness, install Superpowers separately for each one.
## Migrating from the old symlink-based install
If you previously installed superpowers using `git clone` and symlinks, remove the old setup:
@@ -41,12 +45,15 @@ Use OpenCode's native `skill` tool:
```
use skill tool to list skills
use skill tool to load superpowers/brainstorming
use skill tool to load brainstorming
```
## Updating
Superpowers updates automatically when you restart OpenCode.
OpenCode installs Superpowers through a git-backed package spec. Some OpenCode
and Bun versions pin that resolved git dependency in a lockfile or cache, so a
restart may not pick up the newest Superpowers commit. If updates do not appear,
clear OpenCode's package cache or reinstall the plugin.
To pin a specific version:
@@ -64,6 +71,26 @@ To pin a specific version:
2. Verify the plugin line in your `opencode.json`
3. Make sure you're running a recent version of OpenCode
### Windows install issues
Some Windows OpenCode builds have upstream installer issues with git-backed
plugin specs, including cache paths for `git+https` URLs and Bun not finding
`git.exe` even when it works in a normal terminal. If OpenCode cannot install
the plugin, try installing with system npm and pointing OpenCode at the local
package:
```powershell
npm install superpowers@git+https://github.com/obra/superpowers.git --prefix "$HOME\.config\opencode"
```
Then use the installed package path in `opencode.json`:
```json
{
"plugin": ["~/.config/opencode/node_modules/superpowers"]
}
```
### Skills not found
1. Use `skill` tool to list what's discovered
@@ -71,11 +98,16 @@ To pin a specific version:
### Tool mapping
When skills reference Claude Code tools:
- `TodoWrite``todowrite`
- `Task` with subagents → `@mention` syntax
- `Skill` tool → OpenCode's native `skill` tool
- File operations → your native tools
Skills speak in actions ("create a todo", "dispatch a subagent", "read a file"). On OpenCode these resolve to:
- "Create a todo" / "mark complete in todo list" → `todowrite`
- `Subagent (general-purpose):` template → `task` tool with `subagent_type: "general"` (or `"explore"` for codebase exploration)
- "Invoke a skill" → OpenCode's native `skill` tool
- "Read a file" → `read`
- "Create a file" / "edit a file" / "delete a file" → `apply_patch`
- "Run a shell command" → `bash`
- "Search file contents" / "find files by name" → `grep`, `glob`
- "Fetch a URL" → `webfetch`
## Getting Help

View File

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
/**
* Superpowers plugin for OpenCode.ai
*
* Injects superpowers bootstrap context via system prompt transform.
* Injects superpowers bootstrap context via message transform.
* Auto-registers skills directory via config hook (no symlinks needed).
*/
@@ -46,31 +46,47 @@ const normalizePath = (p, homeDir) => {
return path.resolve(normalized);
};
// Module-level cache for bootstrap content.
// The SKILL.md file does not change during a session, so reading + parsing it
// once eliminates redundant fs.existsSync + fs.readFileSync + regex work on
// every agent step. See #1202 for the full analysis.
let _bootstrapCache = undefined; // undefined = not yet loaded, null = file missing
export const SuperpowersPlugin = async ({ client, directory }) => {
const homeDir = os.homedir();
const superpowersSkillsDir = path.resolve(__dirname, '../../skills');
const envConfigDir = normalizePath(process.env.OPENCODE_CONFIG_DIR, homeDir);
const configDir = envConfigDir || path.join(homeDir, '.config/opencode');
// Helper to generate bootstrap content
// Helper to generate bootstrap content (cached after first call)
const getBootstrapContent = () => {
// Return cached result on subsequent calls
if (_bootstrapCache !== undefined) return _bootstrapCache;
// Try to load using-superpowers skill
const skillPath = path.join(superpowersSkillsDir, 'using-superpowers', 'SKILL.md');
if (!fs.existsSync(skillPath)) return null;
if (!fs.existsSync(skillPath)) {
_bootstrapCache = null;
return null;
}
const fullContent = fs.readFileSync(skillPath, 'utf8');
const { content } = extractAndStripFrontmatter(fullContent);
const toolMapping = `**Tool Mapping for OpenCode:**
When skills reference tools you don't have, substitute OpenCode equivalents:
- \`TodoWrite\`\`todowrite\`
- \`Task\` tool with subagents → Use OpenCode's subagent system (@mention)
- \`Skill\` tool → OpenCode's native \`skill\` tool
- \`Read\`, \`Write\`, \`Edit\`, \`Bash\` → Your native tools
When skills request actions, substitute OpenCode equivalents:
- Create or update todos\`todowrite\`
- \`Subagent (general-purpose):\`\`task\` with \`subagent_type: "general"\`
- Invoke a skill → OpenCode's native \`skill\` tool
- Read files → \`read\`
- Create, edit, or delete files → \`apply_patch\`
- Run shell commands → \`bash\`
- Search files → \`grep\`, \`glob\`
- Fetch a URL → \`webfetch\`
Use OpenCode's native \`skill\` tool to list and load skills.`;
return `<EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>
_bootstrapCache = `<EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>
You have superpowers.
**IMPORTANT: The using-superpowers skill content is included below. It is ALREADY LOADED - you are currently following it. Do NOT use the skill tool to load "using-superpowers" again - that would be redundant.**
@@ -79,6 +95,8 @@ ${content}
${toolMapping}
</EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>`;
return _bootstrapCache;
};
return {
@@ -98,13 +116,22 @@ ${toolMapping}
// Using a user message instead of a system message avoids:
// 1. Token bloat from system messages repeated every turn (#750)
// 2. Multiple system messages breaking Qwen and other models (#894)
//
// The hook fires on every agent step (not just every turn) because
// opencode's prompt.ts reloads messages from DB each step. Fresh message
// arrays may need injection again, so getBootstrapContent() must not do
// repeated disk work.
'experimental.chat.messages.transform': async (_input, output) => {
const bootstrap = getBootstrapContent();
if (!bootstrap || !output.messages.length) return;
const firstUser = output.messages.find(m => m.info.role === 'user');
if (!firstUser || !firstUser.parts.length) return;
// Only inject once
// Guard: skip if first user message already contains bootstrap.
// This prevents double injection when OpenCode passes an already
// transformed in-memory message array through the hook again.
if (firstUser.parts.some(p => p.type === 'text' && p.text.includes('EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT'))) return;
const ref = firstUser.parts[0];
firstUser.parts.unshift({ ...ref, type: 'text', text: bootstrap });
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
import { readFileSync } from "node:fs";
import { dirname, resolve } from "node:path";
import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url";
import type { ExtensionAPI } from "@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent";
const EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT_MARKER = "<EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>";
const BOOTSTRAP_MARKER = "superpowers:using-superpowers bootstrap for pi";
const extensionDir = dirname(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url));
const packageRoot = resolve(extensionDir, "../..");
const skillsDir = resolve(packageRoot, "skills");
const bootstrapSkillPath = resolve(skillsDir, "using-superpowers", "SKILL.md");
let cachedBootstrap: string | null | undefined;
export default function superpowersPiExtension(pi: ExtensionAPI) {
let injectBootstrap = true;
pi.on("resources_discover", async () => ({
skillPaths: [skillsDir],
}));
pi.on("session_start", async () => {
injectBootstrap = true;
});
pi.on("session_compact", async () => {
injectBootstrap = true;
});
pi.on("agent_end", async () => {
injectBootstrap = false;
});
pi.on("context", async (event) => {
if (!injectBootstrap) return;
if (event.messages.some(messageContainsBootstrap)) return;
const bootstrap = getBootstrapContent();
if (!bootstrap) return;
const bootstrapMessage = {
role: "user" as const,
content: [{ type: "text" as const, text: bootstrap }],
timestamp: Date.now(),
};
const insertAt = firstNonCompactionSummaryIndex(event.messages);
return {
messages: [
...event.messages.slice(0, insertAt),
bootstrapMessage,
...event.messages.slice(insertAt),
],
};
});
}
function getBootstrapContent(): string | null {
if (cachedBootstrap !== undefined) return cachedBootstrap;
try {
const skillContent = readFileSync(bootstrapSkillPath, "utf8");
const body = stripFrontmatter(skillContent);
cachedBootstrap = `${EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT_MARKER}
${BOOTSTRAP_MARKER}
You have superpowers.
The using-superpowers skill content is included below and is already loaded for this Pi session. Follow it now. Do not try to load using-superpowers again.
${body}
${piToolMapping()}
</EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>`;
return cachedBootstrap;
} catch {
cachedBootstrap = null;
return null;
}
}
function stripFrontmatter(content: string): string {
const match = content.match(/^---\n[\s\S]*?\n---\n([\s\S]*)$/);
return (match ? match[1] : content).trim();
}
function piToolMapping(): string {
return `## Pi tool mapping
Pi has native skills but does not expose Claude Code's \`Skill\` tool. When a Superpowers instruction says to invoke a skill, use Pi's native skill system instead: load the relevant \`SKILL.md\` with \`read\` when the skill applies, or let a human invoke \`/skill:name\` explicitly.
Pi's built-in coding tools are lowercase: \`read\`, \`write\`, \`edit\`, \`bash\`, plus optional \`grep\`, \`find\`, and \`ls\`. Use those for the corresponding actions: read a file, create or edit files, run shell commands, search file contents, find files by name, and list directories.
Pi does not ship a standard subagent tool. If a subagent tool such as \`subagent\` from \`pi-subagents\` is available, use it for Superpowers subagent workflows. If no subagent tool is available, do the work in this session or explain the missing capability instead of inventing \`Task\` calls.
Pi does not ship a standard task-list tool. If an installed todo/task tool is available, use it. Otherwise track work in plan files or a repo-local \`TODO.md\` when task tracking is needed. Treat older \`TodoWrite\` references as this task-tracking action.`;
}
function messageContainsBootstrap(message: unknown): boolean {
const content = (message as { content?: unknown }).content;
if (typeof content === "string") return content.includes(BOOTSTRAP_MARKER);
if (!Array.isArray(content)) return false;
return content.some((part) => {
return (
part &&
typeof part === "object" &&
(part as { type?: unknown }).type === "text" &&
typeof (part as { text?: unknown }).text === "string" &&
(part as { text: string }).text.includes(BOOTSTRAP_MARKER)
);
});
}
function firstNonCompactionSummaryIndex(messages: unknown[]): number {
let index = 0;
while ((messages[index] as { role?: unknown } | undefined)?.role === "compactionSummary") {
index += 1;
}
return index;
}

21
.pre-commit-config.yaml Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
repos:
- repo: local
hooks:
- id: evals-ruff-check
name: evals ruff check
entry: uv --project evals run ruff check
language: system
files: ^evals/.*\.py$
- id: evals-ruff-format-check
name: evals ruff format --check
entry: uv --project evals run ruff format --check
language: system
files: ^evals/.*\.py$
- id: evals-ty-check
name: evals ty check
entry: uv --directory evals run ty check
language: system
pass_filenames: false
files: ^evals/.*\.py$

20
.version-bump.json Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
{
"files": [
{ "path": "package.json", "field": "version" },
{ "path": ".claude-plugin/plugin.json", "field": "version" },
{ "path": ".cursor-plugin/plugin.json", "field": "version" },
{ "path": ".codex-plugin/plugin.json", "field": "version" },
{ "path": ".claude-plugin/marketplace.json", "field": "plugins.0.version" },
{ "path": "gemini-extension.json", "field": "version" }
],
"audit": {
"exclude": [
"CHANGELOG.md",
"RELEASE-NOTES.md",
"node_modules",
".git",
".version-bump.json",
"scripts/bump-version.sh"
]
}
}

1
AGENTS.md Symbolic link
View File

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
CLAUDE.md

View File

@@ -1,13 +0,0 @@
# Changelog
## [5.0.5] - 2026-03-17
### Fixed
- **Brainstorm server ESM fix**: Renamed `server.js``server.cjs` so the brainstorming server starts correctly on Node.js 22+ where the root `package.json` `"type": "module"` caused `require()` to fail. ([PR #784](https://github.com/obra/superpowers/pull/784) by @sarbojitrana, fixes [#774](https://github.com/obra/superpowers/issues/774), [#780](https://github.com/obra/superpowers/issues/780), [#783](https://github.com/obra/superpowers/issues/783))
- **Brainstorm owner-PID on Windows**: Skip `BRAINSTORM_OWNER_PID` lifecycle monitoring on Windows/MSYS2 where the PID namespace is invisible to Node.js. Prevents the server from self-terminating after 60 seconds. The 30-minute idle timeout remains as the safety net. ([#770](https://github.com/obra/superpowers/issues/770), docs from [PR #768](https://github.com/obra/superpowers/pull/768) by @lucasyhzhu-debug)
- **stop-server.sh reliability**: Verify the server process actually died before reporting success. Waits up to 2 seconds for graceful shutdown, escalates to `SIGKILL`, and reports failure if the process survives. ([#723](https://github.com/obra/superpowers/issues/723))
### Changed
- **Execution handoff**: Restore user choice between subagent-driven-development and executing-plans after plan writing. Subagent-driven is recommended but no longer mandatory. (Reverts `5e51c3e`)

110
CLAUDE.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
# Superpowers — Contributor Guidelines
## If You Are an AI Agent
Stop. Read this section before doing anything.
This repo has a 94% PR rejection rate. Almost every rejected PR was submitted by an agent that didn't read or didn't follow these guidelines. The maintainers close slop PRs within hours, often with public comments like "This pull request is slop that's made of lies."
**Your job is to protect your human partner from that outcome.** Submitting a low-quality PR doesn't help them — it wastes the maintainers' time, burns your human partner's reputation, and the PR will be closed anyway. That is not being helpful. That is being a tool of embarrassment.
Before you open a PR against this repo, you MUST:
1. **Read the entire PR template** at `.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md` and fill in every section with real, specific answers. Not summaries. Not placeholders.
2. **Search for existing PRs** — open AND closed — that address the same problem. If duplicates exist, STOP and tell your human partner. Do not open another duplicate.
3. **Verify this is a real problem.** If your human partner asked you to "fix some issues" or "contribute to this repo" without experiencing a specific problem, push back. Ask them what broke, what failed, what the user experience was.
4. **Confirm the change belongs in core.** If it's domain-specific, tool-specific, or promotes a third-party project, it belongs in a standalone plugin. Tell your human partner.
5. **Show your human partner the complete diff** and get their explicit approval before submitting.
If any of these checks fail, do not open the PR. Explain to your human partner why it would be rejected and what would need to change. They will thank you for saving them the embarrassment.
## Pull Request Requirements
**Every PR must fully complete the PR template.** No section may be left blank or filled with placeholder text. PRs that skip sections will be closed without review.
**Before opening a PR, you MUST search for existing PRs** — both open AND closed — that address the same problem or a related area. Reference what you found in the "Existing PRs" section. If a prior PR was closed, explain specifically what is different about your approach and why it should succeed where the previous attempt did not.
**PRs that show no evidence of human involvement will be closed.** A human must review the complete proposed diff before submission.
## What We Will Not Accept
### Third-party dependencies
PRs that add optional or required dependencies on third-party projects will not be accepted unless they are adding support for a new harness (e.g., a new IDE or CLI tool). Superpowers is a zero-dependency plugin by design. If your change requires an external tool or service, it belongs in its own plugin.
### "Compliance" changes to skills
Our internal skill philosophy differs from Anthropic's published guidance on writing skills. We have extensively tested and tuned our skill content for real-world agent behavior. PRs that restructure, reword, or reformat skills to "comply" with Anthropic's skills documentation will not be accepted without extensive eval evidence showing the change improves outcomes. The bar for modifying behavior-shaping content is very high.
### Project-specific or personal configuration
Skills, hooks, or configuration that only benefit a specific project, team, domain, or workflow do not belong in core. Publish these as a separate plugin.
### Bulk or spray-and-pray PRs
Do not trawl the issue tracker and open PRs for multiple issues in a single session. Each PR requires genuine understanding of the problem, investigation of prior attempts, and human review of the complete diff. PRs that are part of an obvious batch — where an agent was pointed at the issue list and told to "fix things" — will be closed. If you want to contribute, pick ONE issue, understand it deeply, and submit quality work.
### Speculative or theoretical fixes
Every PR must solve a real problem that someone actually experienced. "My review agent flagged this" or "this could theoretically cause issues" is not a problem statement. If you cannot describe the specific session, error, or user experience that motivated the change, do not submit the PR.
### Domain-specific skills
Superpowers core contains general-purpose skills that benefit all users regardless of their project. Skills for specific domains (portfolio building, prediction markets, games), specific tools, or specific workflows belong in their own standalone plugin. Ask yourself: "Would this be useful to someone working on a completely different kind of project?" If not, publish it separately.
### Fork-specific changes
If you maintain a fork with customizations, do not open PRs to sync your fork or push fork-specific changes upstream. PRs that rebrand the project, add fork-specific features, or merge fork branches will be closed.
### Fabricated content
PRs containing invented claims, fabricated problem descriptions, or hallucinated functionality will be closed immediately. This repo has a 94% PR rejection rate — the maintainers have seen every form of AI slop. They will notice.
### Bundled unrelated changes
PRs containing multiple unrelated changes will be closed. Split them into separate PRs.
## New Harness Support
If your PR adds support for a new harness (IDE, CLI tool, agent runner), you MUST include a session transcript proving the integration works end-to-end.
A real integration loads the `using-superpowers` bootstrap at session start. The bootstrap is what causes skills to auto-trigger at the right moments. Without it, the skills are dead weight — present on disk but never invoked.
**The acceptance test.** Open a clean session in the new harness and send exactly this user message:
> Let's make a react todo list
A working integration auto-triggers the `brainstorming` skill before any code is written. Paste the complete transcript in the PR.
**These are not real integrations and will be closed:**
- Manually copying skill files into the harness
- Wrapping with `npx skills` or similar at-runtime shims
- Anything that requires the user to opt in to skills per-session
- Anything where `brainstorming` does not auto-trigger on the acceptance test above
If you are not sure whether your integration loads the bootstrap at session start, it does not.
## Skill Changes Require Evaluation
Skills are not prose — they are code that shapes agent behavior. If you modify skill content:
- Use `superpowers:writing-skills` to develop and test changes
- Run adversarial pressure testing across multiple sessions
- Show before/after eval results in your PR
- Do not modify carefully-tuned content (Red Flags tables, rationalization lists, "human partner" language) without evidence the change is an improvement
## Eval harness
Skill-behavior evals live in the `evals/` submodule — after cloning, run `git submodule update --init evals`, then see `evals/README.md`. Drill (the harness) drives real tmux sessions of Claude Code / Codex / Gemini CLI and judges skill compliance with an LLM verifier. Plugin-infrastructure tests still live at `tests/`.
## Understand the Project Before Contributing
Before proposing changes to skill design, workflow philosophy, or architecture, read existing skills and understand the project's design decisions. Superpowers has its own tested philosophy about skill design, agent behavior shaping, and terminology (e.g., "your human partner" is deliberate, not interchangeable with "the user"). Changes that rewrite the project's voice or restructure its approach without understanding why it exists will be rejected.
## General
- Read `.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md` before submitting
- One problem per PR
- Test on at least one harness and report results in the environment table
- Describe the problem you solved, not just what you changed

192
README.md
View File

@@ -1,6 +1,10 @@
# Superpowers
Superpowers is a complete software development workflow for your coding agents, built on top of a set of composable "skills" and some initial instructions that make sure your agent uses them.
Superpowers is a complete software development methodology for your coding agents, built on top of a set of composable skills and some initial instructions that make sure your agent uses them.
## Quickstart
Give your agent Superpowers: [Claude Code](#claude-code), [Antigravity](#antigravity), [Codex App](#codex-app), [Codex CLI](#codex-cli), [Cursor](#cursor), [Factory Droid](#factory-droid), [Gemini CLI](#gemini-cli), [GitHub Copilot CLI](#github-copilot-cli), [OpenCode](#opencode), [Pi](#pi).
## How it works
@@ -10,7 +14,7 @@ Once it's teased a spec out of the conversation, it shows it to you in chunks sh
After you've signed off on the design, your agent puts together an implementation plan that's clear enough for an enthusiastic junior engineer with poor taste, no judgement, no project context, and an aversion to testing to follow. It emphasizes true red/green TDD, YAGNI (You Aren't Gonna Need It), and DRY.
Next up, once you say "go", it launches a *subagent-driven-development* process, having agents work through each engineering task, inspecting and reviewing their work, and continuing forward. It's not uncommon for Claude to be able to work autonomously for a couple hours at a time without deviating from the plan you put together.
Next up, once you say "go", it launches a *subagent-driven-development* process, having agents work through each engineering task, inspecting and reviewing their work, and continuing forward. It's not uncommon for your agent to work autonomously for a couple hours at a time without deviating from the plan you put together.
There's a bunch more to it, but that's the core of the system. And because the skills trigger automatically, you don't need to do anything special. Your coding agent just has Superpowers.
@@ -21,89 +25,158 @@ If Superpowers has helped you do stuff that makes money and you are so inclined,
Thanks!
- Jesse
\- Jesse
## Installation
**Note:** Installation differs by platform. Claude Code or Cursor have built-in plugin marketplaces. Codex and OpenCode require manual setup.
Installation differs by harness. If you use more than one, install Superpowers separately for each one.
### Claude Code Official Marketplace
### Claude Code
Superpowers is available via the [official Claude plugin marketplace](https://claude.com/plugins/superpowers)
Install the plugin from Claude marketplace:
#### Official Marketplace
- Install the plugin from Anthropic's official marketplace:
```bash
/plugin install superpowers@claude-plugins-official
```
#### Superpowers Marketplace
The Superpowers marketplace provides Superpowers and some other related plugins for Claude Code.
- Register the marketplace:
```bash
/plugin marketplace add obra/superpowers-marketplace
```
- Install the plugin from this marketplace:
```bash
/plugin install superpowers@superpowers-marketplace
```
### Antigravity
Install Superpowers as a plugin from this repository:
```bash
/plugin install superpowers@claude-plugins-official
agy plugin install https://github.com/obra/superpowers
```
### Claude Code (via Plugin Marketplace)
Antigravity runs the plugin's session-start hook, so Superpowers is active from
the first message. Reinstall with the same command to update.
In Claude Code, register the marketplace first:
### Codex App
```bash
/plugin marketplace add obra/superpowers-marketplace
```
Superpowers is available via the [official Codex plugin marketplace](https://github.com/openai/plugins).
Then install the plugin from this marketplace:
- In the Codex app, click on Plugins in the sidebar.
- You should see `Superpowers` in the Coding section.
- Click the `+` next to Superpowers and follow the prompts.
```bash
/plugin install superpowers@superpowers-marketplace
```
### Codex CLI
### Cursor (via Plugin Marketplace)
Superpowers is available via the [official Codex plugin marketplace](https://github.com/openai/plugins).
In Cursor Agent chat, install from marketplace:
- Open the plugin search interface:
```text
/add-plugin superpowers
```
```bash
/plugins
```
or search for "superpowers" in the plugin marketplace.
- Search for Superpowers:
### Codex
```bash
superpowers
```
Tell Codex:
- Select `Install Plugin`.
```
Fetch and follow instructions from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/obra/superpowers/refs/heads/main/.codex/INSTALL.md
```
### Cursor
**Detailed docs:** [docs/README.codex.md](docs/README.codex.md)
- In Cursor Agent chat, install from marketplace:
### OpenCode
```text
/add-plugin superpowers
```
Tell OpenCode:
- Or search for "superpowers" in the plugin marketplace.
```
Fetch and follow instructions from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/obra/superpowers/refs/heads/main/.opencode/INSTALL.md
```
### Factory Droid
**Detailed docs:** [docs/README.opencode.md](docs/README.opencode.md)
- Register the marketplace:
### GitHub Copilot CLI
```bash
droid plugin marketplace add https://github.com/obra/superpowers
```
```bash
copilot plugin marketplace add obra/superpowers-marketplace
copilot plugin install superpowers@superpowers-marketplace
```
- Install the plugin:
```bash
droid plugin install superpowers@superpowers
```
### Gemini CLI
```bash
gemini extensions install https://github.com/obra/superpowers
```
- Install the extension:
To update:
```bash
gemini extensions install https://github.com/obra/superpowers
```
- Update later:
```bash
gemini extensions update superpowers
```
### GitHub Copilot CLI
- Register the marketplace:
```bash
copilot plugin marketplace add obra/superpowers-marketplace
```
- Install the plugin:
```bash
copilot plugin install superpowers@superpowers-marketplace
```
### OpenCode
OpenCode uses its own plugin install; install Superpowers separately even if you
already use it in another harness.
- Tell OpenCode:
```
Fetch and follow instructions from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/obra/superpowers/refs/heads/main/.opencode/INSTALL.md
```
- Detailed docs: [docs/README.opencode.md](docs/README.opencode.md)
### Pi
Install Superpowers as a Pi package from this repository:
```bash
gemini extensions update superpowers
pi install git:github.com/obra/superpowers
```
### Verify Installation
For local development, run Pi with this checkout loaded as a temporary package:
Start a new session in your chosen platform and ask for something that should trigger a skill (for example, "help me plan this feature" or "let's debug this issue"). The agent should automatically invoke the relevant superpowers skill.
```bash
pi -e /path/to/superpowers
```
The Pi package loads the Superpowers skills and a small extension that injects the `using-superpowers` bootstrap at session startup and again after compaction. Pi has native skills, so no compatibility `Skill` tool is required. Subagent and task-list tools remain optional Pi companion packages.
## The Basic Workflow
@@ -156,26 +229,25 @@ Start a new session in your chosen platform and ask for something that should tr
- **Complexity reduction** - Simplicity as primary goal
- **Evidence over claims** - Verify before declaring success
Read more: [Superpowers for Claude Code](https://blog.fsck.com/2025/10/09/superpowers/)
Read [the original release announcement](https://blog.fsck.com/2025/10/09/superpowers/).
## Contributing
Skills live directly in this repository. To contribute:
The general contribution process for Superpowers is below. Keep in mind that we don't generally accept contributions of new skills and that any updates to skills must work across all of the coding agents we support.
1. Fork the repository
2. Create a branch for your skill
3. Follow the `writing-skills` skill for creating and testing new skills
4. Submit a PR
2. Switch to the 'dev' branch
3. Create a branch for your work
4. Follow the `writing-skills` skill for creating and testing new and modified skills
5. Submit a PR, being sure to fill in the pull request template.
Skill-behavior tests use the eval harness submodule at `evals/`. After cloning this repo, run `git submodule update --init evals`, then see `evals/README.md` for setup. Plugin-infrastructure tests live at `tests/` and run via the relevant `run-*.sh` or `npm test`.
See `skills/writing-skills/SKILL.md` for the complete guide.
## Updating
Skills update automatically when you update the plugin:
```bash
/plugin update superpowers
```
Superpowers updates are somewhat coding-agent dependent, but are often automatic.
## License
@@ -185,10 +257,6 @@ MIT License - see LICENSE file for details
Superpowers is built by [Jesse Vincent](https://blog.fsck.com) and the rest of the folks at [Prime Radiant](https://primeradiant.com).
For community support, questions, and sharing what you're building with Superpowers, join us on [Discord](https://discord.gg/Jd8Vphy9jq).
## Support
- **Discord**: [Join us on Discord](https://discord.gg/Jd8Vphy9jq)
- **Discord**: [Join us](https://discord.gg/35wsABTejz) for community support, questions, and sharing what you're building with Superpowers
- **Issues**: https://github.com/obra/superpowers/issues
- **Marketplace**: https://github.com/obra/superpowers-marketplace
- **Release announcements**: [Sign up](https://primeradiant.com/superpowers/) to get notified about new versions

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,92 @@
# Superpowers Release Notes
## Unreleased
## v5.1.0 (2026-04-30)
### Removals
- **Legacy slash commands removed** — `/brainstorm`, `/execute-plan`, and `/write-plan` are gone. They were deprecated stubs that did nothing but tell the user to invoke the corresponding skill. Invoke `superpowers:brainstorming`, `superpowers:executing-plans`, and `superpowers:writing-plans` directly instead. (#1188)
- **`superpowers:code-reviewer` named agent removed** — the agent was the plugin's only named agent and was used by exactly two skills, while every other reviewer/implementer subagent in the repo dispatches `general-purpose` with a prompt template alongside its skill. The agent's persona and checklist have been merged into `skills/requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md` as a self-contained Task-dispatch template. Anyone dispatching `Task (superpowers:code-reviewer)` should switch to `Task (general-purpose)` with the prompt template instead. (PR #1299)
- **Integration sections removed from skills** — these were a legacy of the time before agents had native skills systems and didn't help with steering.
### Worktree Skills Rewrite
`using-git-worktrees` and `finishing-a-development-branch` now detect when the agent is already running inside an isolated worktree and prefer the harness's native worktree controls before falling back to `git worktree`. Behavior was TDD-validated and cross-platform-checked across five harnesses. (PRI-974, PR #1121)
- **Environment detection** — both skills check `GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON` before doing anything; if already in a linked worktree, creation is skipped entirely. A submodule guard prevents false detection.
- **Consent before creating worktrees** — `using-git-worktrees` no longer creates worktrees implicitly; the skill asks the user first. Fixes #991 (subagent-driven-development was auto-creating worktrees without consent).
- **Native tool preference (Step 1a)** — when the harness exposes its own worktree tool (e.g. Codex), the skill defers to it. The user's stated preference is respected when expressed.
- **Provenance-based cleanup** — `finishing-a-development-branch` only cleans up worktrees inside `.worktrees/` (created by superpowers); anything outside is left alone. Fixes #940 (Option 2 was incorrectly cleaning up worktrees), #999 (merge-then-remove ordering), and #238 (`cd` to repo root before `git worktree remove`).
- **Detached HEAD handling** — the finishing menu collapses to two options when there is no branch to merge from.
- **Hardcoded `/Users/jesse` paths** in skill examples replaced with generic placeholders. (#858, PR #1122)
### Contributor Guidelines for AI Agents
Two new sections at the top of `CLAUDE.md` (symlinked to `AGENTS.md`) speak directly to AI agents. An audit of the last 100 closed PRs against this repo showed a 94% rejection rate driven by AI-generated slop: agents that didn't read the PR template, opened duplicates, fabricated problem descriptions, or pushed fork- or domain-specific changes upstream.
- **Pre-submission checklist** — read the PR template, search for existing PRs, verify a real problem exists, confirm the change belongs in core, and show the human partner the complete diff before submitting.
- **What we will not accept** — third-party dependencies, "compliance" rewrites of skill content, project-specific configuration, bulk PRs, speculative fixes, domain-specific skills, fork-specific changes, fabricated content, and bundled unrelated changes.
- **New harness PRs require a session transcript** — most past new-harness integrations copied skill files or wrapped with `npx skills` instead of loading the `using-superpowers` bootstrap at session start. The acceptance test ("Let's make a react todo list" must auto-trigger `brainstorming` in a clean session) and a complete transcript are now required.
### Codex Plugin Mirror Tooling
New `sync-to-codex-plugin` script mirrors superpowers into the OpenAI Codex plugin marketplace as `prime-radiant-inc/openai-codex-plugins`. Path/user-agnostic so any team member can run it. (PR #1165)
- Clones the fork fresh into a temp directory per run, regenerates overlays inline, and opens a PR; auto-detects upstream from the script's own location and preflights `rsync`/`git`/`gh auth`/`python3`.
- `--bootstrap` flag for first-time setup; `EXCLUDES` patterns anchored to source root; `assets/` excluded.
- Mirrors `CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md`; drops the `agents/openai.yaml` overlay.
- Seeds `interface.defaultPrompt` in the mirrored `plugin.json`. (PR #1180 by @arittr)
- Codex plugin files are committed to the source repo so the sync script uses canonical versions; Codex marketplace metadata is preserved.
### OpenCode
- **Bootstrap content cached at module level** — `getBootstrapContent()` was calling `fs.existsSync` + `fs.readFileSync` + frontmatter regex on every agent step (the `experimental.chat.messages.transform` hook fires on every step in OpenCode's agent loop). Now read once, cached for the session lifetime, with a null sentinel for the missing-file case. 15 regression tests cover cache behavior, fs call counts, the injection guard, the missing-file sentinel, and cache reset. (Fixes #1202)
- **Integration tests modernized**.
- **Install caveats clarified** in the README.
### Code Review Consolidation
`requesting-code-review` is now self-contained: the persona, checklist, and dispatch template live in `skills/requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md` and the skill dispatches `Task (general-purpose)` directly. (PR #1299)
- **Single source of truth** — the persona/checklist that previously lived in both `agents/code-reviewer.md` and the skill's placeholder template (and drifted independently) is now one file.
- **`subagent-driven-development` follows suit** — its `code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md` now dispatches `Task (general-purpose)` instead of the named agent.
- **Behavioral test added** — `tests/claude-code/test-requesting-code-review.sh` plants real bugs (SQL injection, plaintext password handling, credential logging) into a tiny project and asserts the dispatched reviewer flags every planted issue at Critical/Important severity and refuses to approve the diff.
> Note: `tests/claude-code/test-requesting-code-review.sh` and `tests/claude-code/test-document-review-system.sh` (mentioned later in this document) were lifted into drill scenarios on 2026-05-06 and removed from `tests/`. See `evals/scenarios/code-review-catches-planted-bugs.yaml` and `evals/scenarios/spec-reviewer-catches-planted-flaws.yaml`. The references above and below are preserved as dated artifacts of the work this section describes.
- **Codex and Copilot workaround docs trimmed** — the "Named agent dispatch" sections in `references/codex-tools.md` and `references/copilot-tools.md` documented how to flatten a named agent into a generic dispatch. With no named agents shipping, the workaround is unnecessary; both sections were dropped.
### Subagent-Driven Development
- **No more pause every 3 tasks** — the "review after each batch (3 tasks)" cadence in `requesting-code-review` (originally for `executing-plans`) was leaking into `subagent-driven-development`. Replaced with "each task or at natural checkpoints" plus an explicit continuous-execution directive.
- **SDD integration test now runs its assertions** — three independent bugs caused the test to silently bail before printing any verification results: an unresolved `..` segment in the working-dir path, a `set -euo pipefail` interaction with `find | sort | head -1` (SIGPIPE on the producer killed the script), and a missing `--plugin-dir` on the `claude -p` invocation that caused the test to load the installed plugin instead of the working tree. All three fixed; six verification tests now actually run against a real end-to-end SDD run.
### Cursor
- **Windows SessionStart hook** routed through `run-hook.cmd` instead of invoking the extensionless `session-start` script directly. Fixes Windows opening the file in an editor instead of running it. Also removed an accidental UTF-8 BOM from `hooks-cursor.json`.
### Gemini CLI
- **Subagent dispatch mapping** — Gemini's `Task` dispatch now maps to `@agent-name` / `@generalist`, with parallel subagent dispatch documented for independent tasks.
### Skills
- **Terminology cleanups** across skill content.
### Documentation & Install
- **Factory Droid installation instructions** added to README.
- **Quickstart install links** in README. (PR #1293 by @arittr)
- **Codex plugin install guidance** updated. (PR #1288 by @arittr)
- **Codex `wait` mapping corrected** to `wait_agent` in the tools reference.
- **Install order reorganized**; Codex install instructions cleaned up.
- **Removed vestigial `CHANGELOG.md`** in favor of `RELEASE-NOTES.md` as the single source. (PR #1163 by @shaanmajid)
- **Discord invite link** fixed; release announcements link and a detailed Discord description added to the Community section.
### Community
- @shaanmajid — vestigial `CHANGELOG.md` removal (PR #1163)
- @arittr — README quickstart install links (#1293), Codex plugin install guidance (#1288), `sync-to-codex-plugin` `interface.defaultPrompt` seed (#1180)
## v5.0.7 (2026-03-31)
### GitHub Copilot CLI Support

View File

@@ -1,48 +0,0 @@
---
name: code-reviewer
description: |
Use this agent when a major project step has been completed and needs to be reviewed against the original plan and coding standards. Examples: <example>Context: The user is creating a code-review agent that should be called after a logical chunk of code is written. user: "I've finished implementing the user authentication system as outlined in step 3 of our plan" assistant: "Great work! Now let me use the code-reviewer agent to review the implementation against our plan and coding standards" <commentary>Since a major project step has been completed, use the code-reviewer agent to validate the work against the plan and identify any issues.</commentary></example> <example>Context: User has completed a significant feature implementation. user: "The API endpoints for the task management system are now complete - that covers step 2 from our architecture document" assistant: "Excellent! Let me have the code-reviewer agent examine this implementation to ensure it aligns with our plan and follows best practices" <commentary>A numbered step from the planning document has been completed, so the code-reviewer agent should review the work.</commentary></example>
model: inherit
---
You are a Senior Code Reviewer with expertise in software architecture, design patterns, and best practices. Your role is to review completed project steps against original plans and ensure code quality standards are met.
When reviewing completed work, you will:
1. **Plan Alignment Analysis**:
- Compare the implementation against the original planning document or step description
- Identify any deviations from the planned approach, architecture, or requirements
- Assess whether deviations are justified improvements or problematic departures
- Verify that all planned functionality has been implemented
2. **Code Quality Assessment**:
- Review code for adherence to established patterns and conventions
- Check for proper error handling, type safety, and defensive programming
- Evaluate code organization, naming conventions, and maintainability
- Assess test coverage and quality of test implementations
- Look for potential security vulnerabilities or performance issues
3. **Architecture and Design Review**:
- Ensure the implementation follows SOLID principles and established architectural patterns
- Check for proper separation of concerns and loose coupling
- Verify that the code integrates well with existing systems
- Assess scalability and extensibility considerations
4. **Documentation and Standards**:
- Verify that code includes appropriate comments and documentation
- Check that file headers, function documentation, and inline comments are present and accurate
- Ensure adherence to project-specific coding standards and conventions
5. **Issue Identification and Recommendations**:
- Clearly categorize issues as: Critical (must fix), Important (should fix), or Suggestions (nice to have)
- For each issue, provide specific examples and actionable recommendations
- When you identify plan deviations, explain whether they're problematic or beneficial
- Suggest specific improvements with code examples when helpful
6. **Communication Protocol**:
- If you find significant deviations from the plan, ask the coding agent to review and confirm the changes
- If you identify issues with the original plan itself, recommend plan updates
- For implementation problems, provide clear guidance on fixes needed
- Always acknowledge what was done well before highlighting issues
Your output should be structured, actionable, and focused on helping maintain high code quality while ensuring project goals are met. Be thorough but concise, and always provide constructive feedback that helps improve both the current implementation and future development practices.

BIN
assets/app-icon.png Normal file

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 47 KiB

View File

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><svg id="Calque_1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 512 512"><path d="M394.28,207.8c.81,2.41,1.39,4.78,1.8,7.07,1.61,9.03-.93,17.78-5.99,21.74-22.6,17.7-49.85,29.35-75.34,38.6-.59.22-1.09.28-1.4.34-2.22.47-4.95,1.04-7.25,0-1.46-.66-2.25-1.74-2.66-2.3-1.56-2.1-1.59-4.31-1.56-5.13.1-2.67-.01-4.69,0-4.82.45-3.52.91-10.66,1.41-21.28.6-3.87,2.16-9.63,6.94-13.96,4.01-3.62,8.33-4.6,14.59-5.87,10.76-2.19,37.21-8.22,47.42-16.56,1.63-1.33,2.97-2.65,4.19-3.96,3.72-3.99,6.39-7.92,7.93-10.36,3.22,3.22,7.25,8.48,9.92,16.47Z"/><path d="M428.67,185.28c-2.33,11.99-8.91,22.32-15.88,30.38.27-5.5-.05-12.11-1.86-19.08-5.04-19.36-19.74-34.7-37.78-37.78-32.21-9.74-70.59,3.79-99.08,18.29-3.87,1.95-9.52-2.77-11.84-8.16-3.32-7.71-1.63-6.28,2.61-8.49,38.31-20.03,82.01-39.61,123.91-29.7,8.26,1.95,15.96,5.26,23.48,10.54,11.32,7.96,20.21,24.74,16.44,44Z"/><path d="M117.72,304.2c-.81-2.41-1.39-4.78-1.8-7.07-1.61-9.03.93-17.78,5.99-21.74,22.6-17.7,49.85-29.35,75.34-38.6.59-.22,1.09-.28,1.4-.34,2.22-.47,4.95-1.04,7.25,0,1.46.66,2.25,1.74,2.66,2.3,1.56,2.1,1.59,4.31,1.56,5.13-.1,2.67.01,4.69,0,4.82-.45,3.52-.91,10.66-1.41,21.28-.6,3.87-2.16,9.63-6.94,13.96-4.01,3.62-8.33,4.6-14.59,5.87-10.76,2.19-37.21,8.22-47.42,16.56-1.63,1.33-2.97,2.65-4.19,3.96-3.72,3.99-6.39,7.92-7.93,10.36-3.22-3.22-7.25-8.48-9.92-16.47Z"/><path d="M83.33,326.72c2.33-11.99,8.91-22.32,15.88-30.38-.27,5.5.05,12.11,1.86,19.08,5.04,19.36,19.74,34.7,37.78,37.78,32.21,9.74,70.59-3.79,99.08-18.29,3.87-1.95,9.52,2.77,11.84,8.16,3.32,7.71,1.63,6.28-2.61,8.49-38.31,20.03-82.01,39.61-123.91,29.7-8.26-1.95-15.96-5.26-23.48-10.54-11.32-7.96-20.21-24.74-16.44-44Z"/><ellipse cx="255.16" cy="258.86" rx="28.95" ry="28.76"/></svg>

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 1.7 KiB

View File

@@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
---
description: "Deprecated - use the superpowers:brainstorming skill instead"
---
Tell your human partner that this command is deprecated and will be removed in the next major release. They should ask you to use the "superpowers brainstorming" skill instead.

View File

@@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
---
description: "Deprecated - use the superpowers:executing-plans skill instead"
---
Tell your human partner that this command is deprecated and will be removed in the next major release. They should ask you to use the "superpowers executing-plans" skill instead.

View File

@@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
---
description: "Deprecated - use the superpowers:writing-plans skill instead"
---
Tell your human partner that this command is deprecated and will be removed in the next major release. They should ask you to use the "superpowers writing-plans" skill instead.

View File

@@ -1,126 +0,0 @@
# Superpowers for Codex
Guide for using Superpowers with OpenAI Codex via native skill discovery.
## Quick Install
Tell Codex:
```
Fetch and follow instructions from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/obra/superpowers/refs/heads/main/.codex/INSTALL.md
```
## Manual Installation
### Prerequisites
- OpenAI Codex CLI
- Git
### Steps
1. Clone the repo:
```bash
git clone https://github.com/obra/superpowers.git ~/.codex/superpowers
```
2. Create the skills symlink:
```bash
mkdir -p ~/.agents/skills
ln -s ~/.codex/superpowers/skills ~/.agents/skills/superpowers
```
3. Restart Codex.
4. **For subagent skills** (optional): Skills like `dispatching-parallel-agents` and `subagent-driven-development` require Codex's multi-agent feature. Add to your Codex config:
```toml
[features]
multi_agent = true
```
### Windows
Use a junction instead of a symlink (works without Developer Mode):
```powershell
New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force -Path "$env:USERPROFILE\.agents\skills"
cmd /c mklink /J "$env:USERPROFILE\.agents\skills\superpowers" "$env:USERPROFILE\.codex\superpowers\skills"
```
## How It Works
Codex has native skill discovery — it scans `~/.agents/skills/` at startup, parses SKILL.md frontmatter, and loads skills on demand. Superpowers skills are made visible through a single symlink:
```
~/.agents/skills/superpowers/ → ~/.codex/superpowers/skills/
```
The `using-superpowers` skill is discovered automatically and enforces skill usage discipline — no additional configuration needed.
## Usage
Skills are discovered automatically. Codex activates them when:
- You mention a skill by name (e.g., "use brainstorming")
- The task matches a skill's description
- The `using-superpowers` skill directs Codex to use one
### Personal Skills
Create your own skills in `~/.agents/skills/`:
```bash
mkdir -p ~/.agents/skills/my-skill
```
Create `~/.agents/skills/my-skill/SKILL.md`:
```markdown
---
name: my-skill
description: Use when [condition] - [what it does]
---
# My Skill
[Your skill content here]
```
The `description` field is how Codex decides when to activate a skill automatically — write it as a clear trigger condition.
## Updating
```bash
cd ~/.codex/superpowers && git pull
```
Skills update instantly through the symlink.
## Uninstalling
```bash
rm ~/.agents/skills/superpowers
```
**Windows (PowerShell):**
```powershell
Remove-Item "$env:USERPROFILE\.agents\skills\superpowers"
```
Optionally delete the clone: `rm -rf ~/.codex/superpowers` (Windows: `Remove-Item -Recurse -Force "$env:USERPROFILE\.codex\superpowers"`).
## Troubleshooting
### Skills not showing up
1. Verify the symlink: `ls -la ~/.agents/skills/superpowers`
2. Check skills exist: `ls ~/.codex/superpowers/skills`
3. Restart Codex — skills are discovered at startup
### Windows junction issues
Junctions normally work without special permissions. If creation fails, try running PowerShell as administrator.
## Getting Help
- Report issues: https://github.com/obra/superpowers/issues
- Main documentation: https://github.com/obra/superpowers

View File

@@ -12,10 +12,14 @@ Add superpowers to the `plugin` array in your `opencode.json` (global or project
}
```
Restart OpenCode. The plugin auto-installs via Bun and registers all skills automatically.
Restart OpenCode. The plugin installs through OpenCode's plugin manager and
registers all skills.
Verify by asking: "Tell me about your superpowers"
OpenCode uses its own plugin install. If you also use Claude Code, Codex, or
another harness, install Superpowers separately for each one.
### Migrating from the old symlink-based install
If you previously installed superpowers using `git clone` and symlinks, remove the old setup:
@@ -46,7 +50,7 @@ use skill tool to list skills
### Loading a Skill
```
use skill tool to load superpowers/brainstorming
use skill tool to load brainstorming
```
### Personal Skills
@@ -78,7 +82,10 @@ Create project-specific skills in `.opencode/skills/` within your project.
## Updating
Superpowers updates automatically when you restart OpenCode. The plugin is re-installed from the git repository on each launch.
OpenCode installs Superpowers through a git-backed package spec. Some OpenCode
and Bun versions pin that resolved git dependency in a lockfile or cache, so a
restart may not pick up the newest Superpowers commit. If updates do not appear,
clear OpenCode's package cache or reinstall the plugin.
To pin a specific version, use a branch or tag:
@@ -92,17 +99,23 @@ To pin a specific version, use a branch or tag:
The plugin does two things:
1. **Injects bootstrap context** via the `experimental.chat.system.transform` hook, adding superpowers awareness to every conversation.
1. **Injects bootstrap context** via the `experimental.chat.messages.transform` hook, adding superpowers awareness to every conversation.
2. **Registers the skills directory** via the `config` hook, so OpenCode discovers all superpowers skills without symlinks or manual config.
### Tool Mapping
Skills written for Claude Code are automatically adapted for OpenCode:
Skills speak in actions rather than naming any one runtime's tools. On OpenCode these resolve to:
- `TodoWrite``todowrite`
- `Task` with subagents → OpenCode's `@mention` system
- `Skill` tool → OpenCode's native `skill` tool
- File operations → Native OpenCode tools
- "Create a todo" / "mark complete in todo list"`todowrite`
- `Subagent (general-purpose):` template → OpenCode's `task` tool with `subagent_type: "general"` (or `"explore"` for codebase exploration)
- "Invoke a skill" → OpenCode's native `skill` tool
- "Read a file" → `read`
- "Create a file" / "edit a file" / "delete a file" → `apply_patch`
- "Run a shell command" → `bash`
- "Search file contents" / "find files by name" → `grep`, `glob`
- "Fetch a URL" → `webfetch`
(Verified against the installed OpenCode CLI's tool inventory.)
## Troubleshooting
@@ -112,6 +125,26 @@ Skills written for Claude Code are automatically adapted for OpenCode:
2. Verify the plugin line in your `opencode.json` is correct
3. Make sure you're running a recent version of OpenCode
### Windows install issues
Some Windows OpenCode builds have upstream installer issues with git-backed
plugin specs, including cache paths for `git+https` URLs and Bun not finding
`git.exe` even when it works in a normal terminal. If OpenCode cannot install
the plugin, try installing with system npm and pointing OpenCode at the local
package:
```powershell
npm install superpowers@git+https://github.com/obra/superpowers.git --prefix "$HOME\.config\opencode"
```
Then use the installed package path in `opencode.json`:
```json
{
"plugin": ["~/.config/opencode/node_modules/superpowers"]
}
```
### Skills not found
1. Use OpenCode's `skill` tool to list available skills
@@ -120,7 +153,7 @@ Skills written for Claude Code are automatically adapted for OpenCode:
### Bootstrap not appearing
1. Check OpenCode version supports `experimental.chat.system.transform` hook
1. Check OpenCode version supports `experimental.chat.messages.transform` hook
2. Restart OpenCode after config changes
## Getting Help

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,825 @@
# Porting Superpowers to a New Harness
This guide explains how to add support for a new harness — an IDE, CLI, or
agent runner that isn't Claude Code — so that Superpowers skills auto-trigger
there the same way they do natively.
It is written in two layers. **Part 13** explain how the system works and how
to tell whether a harness can be supported at all; read these before you touch
anything. **Part 48** are a prescriptive procedure for an agent (supervised by
a human partner) to execute the port end to end, through distribution. An
appendix indexes the current reference integrations so you can copy the closest
one.
The integration mechanism differs across harnesses, and it will keep changing.
This guide deliberately teaches the **invariants** — the things that must be
true no matter the mechanism — and points you at a live reference implementation
to copy. When this guide and the code disagree, the code wins; fix the guide.
## Before you start
Adding a harness is the highest-stakes contribution type in this repo. Before
writing anything:
- Read `CLAUDE.md` and `.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md` in full — the
contributor rules and the new-harness PR requirements are not optional.
- Search open **and closed** PRs for a prior attempt at this harness. If one
exists, understand why it stalled before starting your own.
---
## Part 1 — How Superpowers works across harnesses
Superpowers is the same content everywhere. What changes per harness is the thin
layer that delivers that content to the model and translates its instructions
into the harness's native tools. Three components:
1. **Skills (harness-agnostic).** Everything in `skills/` is the source of
truth, shared verbatim by every harness. Skills are written to describe
*actions* — "invoke a skill", "read a file", "dispatch a subagent", "create a
todo" — and never name a specific tool. This is what lets one skill body run
on Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, pi, and the rest without edits.
2. **Tool mapping (per-harness).** Each harness needs the action vocabulary
translated into its real tool names. That translation lives in
`skills/using-superpowers/references/<harness>-tools.md` and/or inline in the
harness's bootstrap injector (see Part 5). It says, e.g., "*dispatch a
subagent* → call `task` with `subagent_type`."
3. **Bootstrap (per-harness).** At the start of every session, the full
`skills/using-superpowers/SKILL.md` is injected into the model's context,
wrapped in `<EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>` tags, with the tool mapping appended. That
injected skill is what teaches the model that skills exist and that it must
check for a relevant skill before acting. **The bootstrap is the entire
integration.** Without it, the skill files are inert — present on disk, never
invoked.
### Two rules that make this work
**1. Skills name actions, not tools.** Do **not** edit skill bodies to fit your
harness. Porting adds a tool-mapping reference and a bootstrap injector; it
never reaches into `skills/*/SKILL.md` to swap tool names. (The project's
contributor guidelines treat skill content as carefully-tuned behavior-shaping
code; rewording it for "compliance" is rejected on sight.)
**2. Everything ships through the harness's own install mechanism. Never edit the
user's files.** The bootstrap, the skills, and the tool mapping all get delivered
*as part of what the harness installs* — a plugin, an extension, a marketplace
entry, an extension-bundled context file. A port **must not** reach into a user's
global or personal config (`~/.gemini/config/AGENTS.md`, `settings.json`,
`trustedFolders.json`, a hand-edited `~/.bashrc`, etc.) to inject anything. The
harness owns what it loads; your install artifact is the only thing you get to
write. If the install mechanism genuinely can't carry the bootstrap, that is a
limitation to surface (Part 6) — never a license to hand-edit the user's config.
(Shape C is *not* an exception: Gemini's context file is fine because it ships
*inside the installed extension* and is declared by the manifest's
`contextFileName` — the harness loads the extension's own file, not a file you
edited in the user's home.)
---
## Part 2 — Can this harness be supported?
A harness can support Superpowers only if it can do all of the following. Check
these before writing code — if the first one fails, stop.
### Hard requirement: automatic session-start injection
The harness must let you inject text into the model's context **at the start of
every session, with no per-session opt-in by your human partner.** This is the
one non-negotiable capability. It can take any form:
- a **hook/event system** that runs a shell command at session start and reads
its stdout (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Copilot CLI), or
- an **in-process plugin/extension** with a session-start or message lifecycle
callback that can mutate the message array (OpenCode, pi), or
- an **instructions-file** convention where the harness loads a context file that
*your installed extension ships and declares* (e.g. Gemini's `contextFileName`
pointing at the extension's own `GEMINI.md`) — not a file you edit in the user's
home.
If the only way to get Superpowers in front of the model is for your human
partner to opt in each session (paste a prompt, run a command, enable a mode),
the harness
**cannot** be properly supported. The acceptance test in Part 3 will fail, and
the PR will be closed. This is the single most common reason a "port" isn't a
real port.
### The rest of the capability checklist
| Capability | Why it's needed | If absent |
|---|---|---|
| **Skill discovery + invocation** | The model must be able to load a skill's full content on demand | If there's no native skill tool, the sanctioned fallback is to `read` the relevant `SKILL.md` directly — see Part 5. A harness with neither a skill tool nor file-read cannot work. |
| **File read / write / edit** | Nearly every skill manipulates files | Essential. No workaround. |
| **Run shell commands** | TDD, verification, git workflows | Essential. |
| **Subagent / task dispatch** | `dispatching-parallel-agents`, `subagent-driven-development` | Degradable: if unavailable, those specific skills tell the model to do the work inline or report the missing capability — *never* to invent a `Task` call. Some harnesses gate this behind a config flag (e.g. Codex needs multi-agent enabled). |
| **Todo / task tracking** | Progress tracking in several skills | Degradable: fall back to a plan file or `TODO.md`. |
| **Web fetch / search** | A few skills | Degradable. |
| **Shell or polyglot script execution (Windows)** | Only for the shell-hook shape, only if you want Windows support | See Part 7. In-process-plugin harnesses sidestep this entirely. |
"Degradable" means: the skill already has fallback wording for the missing
tool. Your job in the tool mapping is to point at the real tool when it exists
and reuse that fallback wording when it doesn't.
### You may not need a new directory at all
Some "new harnesses" are really existing integrations under a different
installer. Factory's Droid, for example, consumes the Claude Code plugin via its
own `plugin install` command and needs no new files here. Before building,
check whether the harness can simply load an existing manifest. A port that adds
nothing to this repo but a paragraph in the README is a perfectly good outcome.
---
## Part 3 — Definition of done
A port is finished when **all** of these are true:
1. The `using-superpowers` bootstrap loads at session start, every session, with
no per-session opt-in.
2. A tool mapping exists for the harness (in
`references/<harness>-tools.md`, inline in the bootstrap, or both — per Part 5).
3. Skills can actually be invoked — natively, or via the documented
read-`SKILL.md` fallback — and the model follows them.
4. **The acceptance test passes.** In a clean session, the user message:
> Let's make a react todo list
auto-triggers the `brainstorming` skill *before any code is written*. Capture
the full transcript — the PR requires it.
5. Tests cover the integration (Part 5) and pass.
6. A real user can install it through the harness's own mechanism (not by
hand-copying files), and the version is tracked in `.version-bump.json` where
applicable (Part 6). Note that some installers rewrite or strip the manifest on
install (one drops it to just `{"name": …}`), so "the *installed* files report
the repo version" is not always achievable — track the version at the source
manifest and don't treat a rewritten installed manifest as a failure.
A quick smoke check before the full acceptance test: start a session and ask the
model to describe its superpowers. If the bootstrap injected, it knows it has
them. (OpenCode's install doc uses `opencode run --print-logs "hello" 2>&1 |
grep -i superpowers` for the same goal via a different mechanism — log-grep
rather than asking the model; the `2>&1` matters because logs go to stderr. Find
your harness's equivalent.)
---
## Part 4 — Choose your integration shape
There are three structural shapes, distinguished by *how you get the bootstrap
in front of the model*. Pick the one that matches what your harness exposes,
then copy that reference implementation. The shape determines almost everything
in Part 5 — the steps below branch on it.
### How to tell which shape you have
Before routing, learn the harness's *actual* mechanism — and don't assume it's
well documented or that it behaves like whatever harness it forked from.
**Find the surface:**
- **Search the web for the harness's docs** (extension / plugin / hook / skill /
MCP / "context file" / "rules file"). Vendor tools change fast; search rather
than trust training knowledge.
- **Find and read an existing third-party extension/plugin for the harness.** A
real working example beats docs — it shows the manifest shape, the install
command, and which components the harness actually loads.
- Check what the harness loads at startup: a settings file? an extensions
directory? a per-project or global instructions file (`AGENTS.md`, `<NAME>.md`)?
**If it's underdocumented, reverse-engineer it empirically** (a real porter has
had to do every one of these):
- `strings` the binary / grep the install tree for hook event names, config
paths, and the instructions file it reads.
- **Ask the running model to enumerate its own tool names** — e.g. "list the
exact machine names of every tool you can call." This is the authoritative way
to get tool names without inventing them (see Step 4).
- Prove every assumption with a **unique-marker test**: inject a nonsense token
through the mechanism you think works, start a fresh session, and confirm the
token actually reached the model.
**A fork does not inherit its parent's behavior.** A harness derived from another
(e.g. a Gemini-derived CLI) may expose the parent's manifest fields and
`@`-include syntax and *still not honor them the same way*. Verify with a marker;
never assume the parent's recipe transfers.
Then route to a shape:
- Shell command at session start whose stdout is read → **Shape A**.
- Plugin/extension module with lifecycle callbacks you run code in → **Shape B**.
- Only ever an always-on instructions file, no hook and no code plugin →
**Shape C**.
**Shapes compose — they are not mutually exclusive.** The *skill-discovery*
mechanism and the *bootstrap* mechanism need not be the same shape — but **both
must still ride the install mechanism** (rule 2). Decide the two questions
separately: *where do skills get discovered?* and *how does the bootstrap reach
the model every session?* A harness might install skills via a plugin yet need
the bootstrap delivered another install-shipped way (an extension-declared
context file, or — see below — by the harness surfacing the installed
`using-superpowers` skill's own description at session start). If more than one
install-mechanism surface injects automatically, prefer the most reliable. What
you may **not** do is bridge a gap by editing the user's global config.
### Shape A — Shell-hook
The harness has a hook system that runs a shell command at session start and
reads JSON from its stdout. The configured command runs `run-hook.cmd`, a
polyglot wrapper that just locates bash and dispatches the named script; the
script (`hooks/session-start`, or a harness-specific variant like
`hooks/session-start-codex`) is what reads `using-superpowers/SKILL.md` and
prints a JSON object whose **field name and nesting differ per harness**.
- Reference: `hooks/session-start` (and `hooks/session-start-codex`),
`hooks/run-hook.cmd`, and the per-harness hook config `hooks/hooks.json`
(Claude Code), `hooks/hooks-codex.json` (Codex), `hooks/hooks-cursor.json`
(Cursor).
- Manifests: `.codex-plugin/plugin.json`, `.cursor-plugin/plugin.json` point the
harness at `./skills/` and the right `hooks-*.json`. (Claude Code's
`.claude-plugin/plugin.json` sets neither field — it auto-discovers `skills/`
and `hooks/hooks.json` by convention.)
> **A hook *system* is not a session-start *event*.** A harness can have a
> `hooks.json` mechanism — and even contain the literal string `SessionStart` in
> its binary — while having no hook event that fires at session start and can
> inject context. (One real harness only exposed pre/post-tool and stop events;
> the `SessionStart` strings were telemetry.) Confirm the *specific event* you
> need exists and can write to the model's context before committing to Shape A.
> If it can't, the bootstrap belongs in an instructions file (Shape C) instead.
### Shape B — In-process plugin / extension
The harness loads a JS/TS module that exposes lifecycle callbacks. You register
the skills directory through the harness's API and inject the bootstrap by
mutating the message array in code.
- Reference: `.opencode/plugins/superpowers.js` (JavaScript) and
`.pi/extensions/superpowers.ts` (TypeScript). pi is the closest reference for
any harness that has **no native skill tool**.
### Shape C — Instructions-file
The harness has neither a shell hook nor a code plugin — its session-start
surface is a context file that *your installed extension ships and the manifest
declares* (e.g. Gemini's `contextFileName` → the extension's own `GEMINI.md`).
You can't run code or mutate messages; the extension's context file points at the
bootstrap. There is no injector to assemble a string or strip frontmatter — the
harness loads the referenced content as-is. **This works only because the file is
part of the installed extension** — never substitute "edit the user's global
`GEMINI.md`/`AGENTS.md`" for shipping your own (rule 2).
- Reference: `gemini-extension.json` (manifest, with `contextFileName`),
`GEMINI.md` (two `@`-includes — the bootstrap skill and the tool-mapping
reference), `skills/using-superpowers/references/gemini-tools.md`.
- Note: `@`-include is a Gemini feature. If your harness loads an instructions
file but has no include syntax, you must inline the bootstrap content into the
file instead.
- **Don't trust that an `@`-include is actually expanded — prove it.** A
Gemini-*derived* harness can accept `@./path` syntax yet treat it as a *hint
the model may choose to read* (it emits a file-read tool call) rather than a
guaranteed inline expansion. That's the difference between the bootstrap being
reliably present every session and the model maybe-reading it. Run a
unique-marker test: if the marker isn't in context *without* a tool call,
**inline the content** rather than `@`-include it.
### Routing table
| If the harness… | Use shape | Copy from |
|---|---|---|
| runs a shell command at session start and reads its stdout | A (shell-hook) | Codex (`hooks/session-start-codex` + `hooks/hooks-codex.json` + `.codex-plugin/`) |
| is a JS/TS plugin host with session/message lifecycle callbacks | B (in-process) | OpenCode (`.opencode/`) — or pi (`.pi/`) if it has no native skill tool |
| ships an extension-declared context file it always loads | C (instructions-file) | Gemini (`gemini-extension.json` + `GEMINI.md` + `references/gemini-tools.md`) |
| has a plugin install command and a manifest `contextFileName` (or equivalent) the installer keeps | C via the plugin installer | Antigravity (`.antigravity-plugin/``agy plugin install` ships a generated context file; verify the installer preserves it — Part 6) |
Most real harnesses fit one row cleanly; the last is the hybrid case (rule 2 still
holds — the bootstrap rides the install mechanism, never a user-config edit).
---
## Part 5 — The porting procedure
### Step 1 — Study the closest reference implementation
Open the files named in Part 4 for your shape and read them end to end. The
patterns below are summaries; the code is the spec.
### Step 2 — Create the manifest / entry point
Create whatever the harness uses to recognize the plugin. Match the existing
ones in spirit:
- **Shape A:** a `*-plugin/plugin.json` (see `.codex-plugin/plugin.json`) with
`name`, `version`, `description`, author/license/keywords, `"skills":
"./skills/"`, and `"hooks": "./hooks/hooks-<harness>.json"`. Plus the
`hooks-<harness>.json` itself, registering a session-start hook whose command
invokes `run-hook.cmd`.
- **Shape B:** the module the harness loads (e.g. `.<harness>/plugins/*.js`) plus
whatever package metadata it needs to be discovered. The committed package
metadata is the **repo-root `package.json`**: `main` points at the OpenCode
plugin, the `pi` field (`pi.extensions`, `pi.skills`) plus the `pi-package`
keyword declare the pi extension. Per-harness local manifests and lockfiles are
kept out of git — `.opencode/.gitignore` excludes `node_modules`,
`package.json`, and lockfiles. Do the same for your harness's *local* install
artifacts so they don't pollute the repo — but never gitignore the repo-root
`package.json`, which is the tracked source of truth.
- **Build/dependency check.** Decide how the harness loads your module:
does it run the source directly (pi's `.ts` is referenced as-is from
`package.json`; OpenCode ships plain `.js`), or does it need a transpile/build
step? Superpowers is zero-runtime-dependency. pi's `import type
{ ExtensionAPI }` works specifically because the harness runs the `.ts`
directly, supplies that type at load, and the repo never type-checks the file
in CI — the import isn't even declared as a dependency. If *your* harness
actually type-checks or bundles the plugin, that breaks: an undeclared type
import fails, and the PR rules only carve out *runtime* deps for new
harnesses, not dev/type packages. If you hit this, confirm the approach with
the maintainer rather than quietly adding a dependency. Keep any build output
out of git and document the command.
- **Shape C (instructions-file):** a small manifest (see `gemini-extension.json`:
`name`, `description`, `version`, `contextFileName`) plus the context file
itself (`GEMINI.md` is just two `@`-includes: the bootstrap skill and the
tool-mapping reference). The Gemini manifest has no `skills` field — Gemini
auto-discovers the `skills/` directory bundled in the installed extension. If
your harness has a native skill tool but no manifest field to register the
directory, you must find its discovery convention (read its extension docs),
then verify empirically: after wiring, ask the model to list its available
skills — if the bundled skills don't appear, discovery isn't working yet.
### Step 3 — Wire the bootstrap injection
This is the heart of the port. The shared goal: at session start, get the
`using-superpowers` skill content (wrapped in `<EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>` tags) plus
the harness's tool mapping in front of the model, with a note that the skill is
already active so the model doesn't try to load it again. *How* you do that —
and what you assemble vs. what the harness loads raw — depends entirely on your
shape. Do **not** apply one shape's recipe to another.
**Shape A — a script reads `SKILL.md` and prints the harness's JSON.** The
dispatched script (`hooks/session-start`) `cat`s the whole `SKILL.md` (frontmatter
included — that's fine; it's emitted verbatim), wraps it with the "You have
superpowers… for all other skills use the Skill tool" preamble, escapes it, and
prints the harness's JSON shape. The tool mapping for Shape A does **not** go
inline here — it lives in `references/<harness>-tools.md` (Step 4). Get the JSON
output shape exactly right. `hooks/session-start`
detects the harness from environment variables and prints *one of three* shapes:
- Cursor (`CURSOR_PLUGIN_ROOT` set): `{ "additional_context": "…" }`
- Claude Code (`CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT` set, `COPILOT_CLI` unset):
`{ "hookSpecificOutput": { "hookEventName": "SessionStart", "additionalContext": "…" } }`
- Copilot CLI / SDK standard (else): `{ "additionalContext": "…" }`
This is a trap. Emitting the wrong field, or an extra one, means the bootstrap
either never injects or injects twice (Claude Code reads both
`additional_context` and `hookSpecificOutput` without de-duplicating, so emitting
both double-injects). Find the
exact field, nesting, and event-matcher values your harness expects. Then
decide: add a fourth branch to `hooks/session-start`, or — if the harness needs
a different bootstrap message or env contract — add a dedicated
`hooks/session-start-<harness>` script, the way Codex did. If you add a branch
and your harness *also* sets an env var an earlier branch keys on (some harnesses
set `CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT` too), order your branch before the one that would
otherwise shadow it. Match the harness's
own event-matcher strings (Claude Code uses `startup|clear|compact`, Codex
`startup|resume|clear`, Cursor `sessionStart`); wrong matchers mean the hook
silently never fires.
The **hook-config schema itself varies per harness** — don't assume the
Claude/Codex shape is universal. Compare `hooks/hooks.json`,
`hooks/hooks-codex.json`, and `hooks/hooks-cursor.json`: Cursor's uses
`"version": 1`, a lowercase `sessionStart` key, a relative
`./hooks/run-hook.cmd` command, and omits the `matcher`/`type`/`async` fields the
others use. Match your `hooks-<harness>.json` to whichever existing file is
closest, not to a single canonical template.
The hook **command string references a harness-provided plugin-root variable**,
and its name differs per harness: `hooks.json` uses `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}`,
`hooks-codex.json` uses `${PLUGIN_ROOT}`, Cursor uses a relative path. Use
whatever your harness exports. (The `session-start` script re-derives the root
itself via `dirname`, so the script body doesn't depend on this — but the
command in the manifest does.)
**Discovering the harness's contract.** The three facts above — env var, JSON
field/nesting, matcher strings — are the harness's contract, not Superpowers',
so you have to source them. Read the harness's hook docs, or find out
empirically: register a throwaway session-start hook that dumps its environment
and emits a marker, then observe which env var identifies the harness and
whether/how the harness ingests your stdout. Pin these down before writing the
real branch.
**Shape B — assemble the string in code, then inject as a user message.** Here
you build the bootstrap yourself: read `SKILL.md`, strip its YAML frontmatter,
and assemble `<EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>` + a short preamble that the skill is already
loaded and must not be re-invoked + the stripped body + the inline tool mapping +
`</EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>`. One subtlety the references disagree on: OpenCode's
preamble says "do NOT use the skill tool…" (assumes a `skill` tool exists), while
pi's just says "do not try to load using-superpowers again." If your harness has
no skill tool, use pi's wording, not OpenCode's.
Inject the result as a **user-role message, not a system message** — system
messages bloat tokens when repeated every turn (#750) and multiple system
messages break some models (#894). Three things you must replicate:
- **Dedup guard.** The lifecycle callback can fire repeatedly (OpenCode's
transform runs on *every* agent step; pi's `context` fires per turn). Before
injecting, check whether a bootstrap marker is already present and skip if so.
(The references pick different markers — pi a custom string, OpenCode the
`EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT` tag; matching the tag is more robust since it needs no
harness-specific constant.) Cache the bootstrap content at module level so
you're not re-reading and re-parsing `SKILL.md` on every call (#1202).
- **Compaction.** If the harness compacts/summarizes history, re-inject
afterward. pi sets an `injectBootstrap` flag on `session_start` and
`session_compact`, clears it on `agent_end`, and inserts the message *after*
any leading compaction-summary messages. OpenCode relies on its per-step
re-injection plus the dedup guard.
- **Message-object shape is per-harness — discover yours, don't copy a literal.**
The two references use *incompatible* shapes: pi builds
`{ role, content: [{ type, text }], timestamp }`; OpenCode manipulates
`message.info.role` and `message.parts[]`. Find your harness's message shape
from its API; copying a reference's object literal verbatim will fail silently.
**Shape C — point your extension's context file at the bootstrap; assemble
nothing.** There is no injector, so you do *not* strip frontmatter or build a
wrapped string. The context file your extension ships (declared by the manifest —
*not* the user's own global file) pulls in two things: the `using-superpowers`
skill and the harness's tool-mapping reference. `GEMINI.md`
does this with two `@`-includes (`@./skills/using-superpowers/SKILL.md` and
`@./skills/using-superpowers/references/<harness>-tools.md`); the harness loads
them raw, frontmatter and all, and `SKILL.md` already carries its own
`<EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT>` block internally. If your harness has no include syntax,
inline the content into the instructions file instead. Gemini ships **no**
"already loaded, don't re-invoke" preamble — for an `@`-include harness the
content is the active instruction set, not a skill the model would re-load. If
you find your harness does try to re-invoke, add that note as a literal line in
the instructions file (you have no code to add it any other way).
### Step 4 — Write the tool mapping
Translate the action vocabulary into the harness's real tools. Cover every one
of these actions (omit only what genuinely doesn't apply):
- read a file
- create / edit / delete a file (one `apply_patch`-style tool, or separate
write/edit?)
- run a shell command
- search file contents / find files by name (grep, glob)
- fetch a URL / web search
- **dispatch a subagent**, including how to pass the agent type — and any config
flag needed to enable it
- **create / update todos** (treat older `TodoWrite` references as this action)
- **invoke a skill** — see Step 5
**Get the real tool names from the harness; never invent them.** If the docs
don't list them, the authoritative source is the harness itself: in a live
session, ask the model to "list the exact machine names of every tool you can
call, one per line" and use what it reports.
**How the harness finds the `skills/` directory is itself per-harness** — confirm
it, don't assume. Possibilities: a manifest `skills` path field (Codex's
`"skills": "./skills/"`); a *co-located* `skills/` the harness auto-scans (where a
path field is **ignored** — one real harness only scanned a `skills/` sitting next
to `plugin.json`); an API/registration call (OpenCode, pi); or you stage an
install dir that pairs the manifest with a **symlink to the repo's `skills/`** and
point the installer at the staging dir (verify the installer *dereferences* the
symlink and copies the real files — confirm with `agy plugin validate`/`install`
or the equivalent before relying on it). A `skills` path field is *not* portable.
Where the mapping lives depends on shape:
- **Shape A:** put it in `skills/using-superpowers/references/<harness>-tools.md`.
The agent reaches it from the bootstrap — `SKILL.md`'s "Platform Adaptation"
section links the per-harness references files. (Shape A harnesses have no
instructions file; the mapping is *not* inlined into the hook output.)
- **Shape B:** the mapping is typically inlined into the bootstrap string you
inject (see the `toolMapping` constant in `superpowers.js`). pi keeps it in
*both* places — `piToolMapping()` inline **and** `references/pi-tools.md`. If
you maintain it in two places, update both, or the port is half-done.
- **Shape C:** put it in `references/<harness>-tools.md` and pull it into the
always-loaded instructions file (e.g. `GEMINI.md` `@`-includes
`gemini-tools.md`).
You may also add a one-line pointer to your harness in `SKILL.md`'s "Platform
Adaptation" section so an agent reading the bootstrap knows where its mapping
lives. This is the one edit to a `SKILL.md` a port may make — and only because
that section is a pointer list, not behavior-shaping content. It does not violate
the "don't edit skill bodies" rule (Part 1); do not touch anything else in any
skill. (The list is a convenience pointer, not an exhaustive registry — not every
harness is listed.)
### Step 5 — Handle a harness with no native skill tool
`using-superpowers/SKILL.md` tells the model to *never read skill files manually
with file tools — always use your platform's skill-loading mechanism.* The point
is "don't bypass the mechanism," not "never use file-read." What counts as "your
platform's mechanism" depends on the harness — and for a harness with no skill
tool, the documented mechanism *is* reading `SKILL.md`. So reading it there
honors the rule rather than breaking it. Distinguish three cases:
1. **Native `Skill`-style tool** (Claude Code, Copilot CLI, Gemini's
`activate_skill`): point the mapping at that tool.
2. **Native skill *discovery* but no `Skill` tool** (pi, Antigravity): the harness
can find and list skills, but the model can't call a tool to load one. Get the
skills installed where the harness scans (pi registers via `resources_discover`
`skillPaths`; OpenCode via its `config` hook; `agy plugin install` copies
them in), and tell the model to load a skill by **reading its `SKILL.md` with
the file-read tool when the skill applies** — the sanctioned mechanism here,
the way `references/pi-tools.md` states it.
**For the bootstrap itself, prefer a declared context file (Part 6).** If the
harness has a `contextFileName`-style manifest field — as Antigravity does —
ship a generated context file through the installer: it's guaranteed-loaded and
carries both the `using-superpowers` content and the tool mapping. That is the
strong, preferred path.
**Fallback — the surfaced skill index.** If there's no context-file field but
the harness surfaces each installed skill's name + description at session start,
you need *neither* a built index nor a runtime-list instruction — the harness
is the index, and `using-superpowers`'s own surfaced description can be what
triggers the model to load it. This is softer than a declared context file;
two things it does **not** give you, versus a context file / hook / in-process
injector — account for both:
- **It bootstraps *triggering*, not the *tool mapping*.** An injector prepends
`<harness>-tools.md` alongside `using-superpowers` every session. Here nothing
injects the mapping — the model only sees skill *descriptions* and must *read*
your `references/<harness>-tools.md` when it needs tool names. It works
because skills name actions (the model reads the mapping when it acts), but
it's softer than injection. Make sure the mapping is reachable from what the
model loads — e.g. linked from `SKILL.md`'s Platform Adaptation section and
installed alongside the skills — not just sitting in the repo.
- **There's no structural guarantee the trigger fires.** No `<EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>`
wrapper, no dedup, no re-injection after compaction — firing depends on the
model choosing to act on a description it sees in the index. This is exactly
why the acceptance test is mandatory here: it is the *only* guarantee, so run
it on the model(s) your users will actually use, not just the strongest one.
3. **No skill system at all:** there is nothing to register, and the *only*
mechanism is the model reading `SKILL.md` on demand. But the model can't read
what it can't find: `using-superpowers/SKILL.md` does **not** enumerate the
available skills, so on its own the model won't know which skills exist or
their triggers. You must supply a discovery path. Two options, and they differ
in durability: (a) generate a skill index (each `skills/*/SKILL.md`'s `name` +
`description` frontmatter) and place it *inside* the `<EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>`
wrapper alongside the tool mapping (Shape B recipe above) so it's covered by
the dedup guard — but a build-time index goes stale as skills are added; or
(b) instruct the model to list `skills/*/SKILL.md` at runtime and read their
frontmatter to find a match — slower but never stale. Prefer (b) unless you
have a reason not to. Without either, a no-skill-system port loads the
bootstrap but silently never triggers any other skill.
In cases 2 and 3, say plainly in your tool mapping that reading `SKILL.md` is the
blessed path, so the model doesn't think it's violating the "never read skill
files" rule. Don't go hunting for a `skillPaths`-style registration API in a
harness that has no skill system — case 3 has none.
### Step 6 — Add tests
Match the existing per-harness test style:
- **Shape A:** assert the hook's stdout has the exact JSON shape your harness
consumes, and that it contains the bootstrap. See `tests/hooks/test-session-start.sh`,
which validates each harness's output shape.
- **Shape B:** a unit test that fakes the harness's plugin API and asserts the
lifecycle handlers register, the bootstrap injects once, the dedup guard
works, and (if relevant) compaction re-injection works. See
`tests/pi/test-pi-extension.mjs`. Add an isolated-install integration check in
the style of `tests/opencode/`.
- If the bootstrap is cached, test that the cache behaves when the file is
missing (see the OpenCode caching tests).
These automated tests cover the wiring; the live tmux run in Step 7 is what
proves the integration actually triggers skills.
### Step 7 — Install locally, then drive a live instance to verify
You cannot confirm a port works by reading code. You have to run the harness with
your in-progress port loaded and watch a real session — which is also how you
produce the transcript the PR requires.
**Install locally.** Point a *local* instance of the harness at your working
tree, not a published build:
- **Shape A / C:** install the plugin/extension from this repo's local path (or
symlink its directory into wherever the harness looks). Find the harness's
"install from a local directory / git checkout" path in its docs.
- **Shape B:** register the local module — e.g. an `opencode.json` `plugin`
entry pointing at the local path, or pi resolving the `package.json` fields
from the repo.
Reinstall after each change and restart the harness, since the bootstrap loads at
startup.
**Drive it with tmux.** Most harnesses are interactive REPLs/TUIs that can't be
driven by piping stdin, so run the harness inside a detached tmux session and
control it with `send-keys` / `capture-pane`. A harness may advertise a
non-interactive "run one prompt" mode (e.g. `opencode run "..."`) — try it for the
quick smoke check, but **don't depend on it**: these modes are frequently flaky,
auth-gated, or trust-gated (one real harness's `--print` mode hung and timed out
with no output every time). Be ready to do *everything*, including the smoke
check, through tmux.
**Clear the gates first, or tmux stalls silently.** Many harnesses block on
first-run onboarding, a "do you trust this folder?" prompt, a sandbox mode, or a
permission gate — and a detached tmux session will just sit there with no error
while it waits. Before the run, pre-trust your scratch directory (in the harness's
settings/config) or be prepared to answer those prompts via `send-keys`, and
account for the harness's startup time in your first `sleep`.
```bash
# 1. Launch the harness detached, in a throwaway project dir
mkdir -p /tmp/port-smoke
tmux new-session -d -s port-test -c /tmp/port-smoke '<harness-launch-command>'
# 2. Let it initialize — real TUIs take longer than you think (10s+ with a model
# handshake); tune this. THEN capture and clear any blocking modal before you
# type a prompt: first-run onboarding and "trust this folder?" are modal, so
# keystrokes sent during them select menu items instead of typing your prompt.
sleep 12
tmux capture-pane -t port-test -p # onboarding / trust prompt? answer it via send-keys first
# (e.g. tmux send-keys -t port-test Enter # to accept a trust prompt — inspect before assuming)
# 3. Smoke check: does the model know it has superpowers?
# Send the text and Enter as SEPARATE send-keys with a beat between them —
# sending them together races on some TUIs (Enter arrives before the text lands).
tmux send-keys -t port-test 'What are your superpowers?'; sleep 0.4; tmux send-keys -t port-test Enter
sleep 5
tmux capture-pane -t port-test -p # reply should show it knows its skills
# 4. Acceptance test: exact prompt (note the escaped apostrophe), fresh session
tmux send-keys -t port-test 'Let'\''s make a react todo list'; sleep 0.4; tmux send-keys -t port-test Enter
# poll until the turn finishes — re-capture every few seconds, don't capture once
sleep 8
tmux capture-pane -t port-test -p # PASS = brainstorming triggers BEFORE any code
# 5. Save the transcript for the PR, then clean up
tmux capture-pane -t port-test -p > /tmp/port-smoke/transcript.txt
tmux kill-session -t port-test
```
tmux gotchas that bite here: wait after launch before the first capture; send the
prompt text and `Enter` as *separate* `send-keys` calls with a short `sleep`
between them (sending them together races on some TUIs), and `Enter` is a key name
not `\n`; the agent's turn takes time, so **poll `capture-pane` in a loop** rather
than capturing once; `capture-pane` shows only the visible pane, so for a long
conversation use the harness's own transcript/log file as the record of truth;
always `kill-session` when done.
If the smoke check shows the model *doesn't* know it has superpowers, the
bootstrap isn't loading — fix that before bothering with the acceptance test.
---
## Part 6 — Distribution and release
A working integration in this repo isn't usable until a real user can install
it. Distribution differs per harness ecosystem — find yours:
| Channel | Example | What you do |
|---|---|---|
| Native plugin marketplace | Claude Code | Register in `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`; users `/plugin install`. The external `superpowers-marketplace` repo is the source of truth users install from — see the release steps in `CLAUDE.md`. |
| External marketplace fork, synced by script | Codex | `scripts/sync-to-codex-plugin.sh` rsyncs the tracked plugin files into a separate fork repo and opens a PR. Read its include/exclude list so you ship the right tree (it deliberately drops repo-internal dirs and other harnesses' dotdirs). |
| Git-URL extension install | Gemini, OpenCode | Users install from a git URL (`gemini extensions install …`; an `opencode.json` `plugin` array entry). Document the exact command. |
| Package-manifest fields | pi | Declared through fields in the repo-root `package.json`; users install via the harness's package command. |
| Local installer (plugin install) | Antigravity (`agy`) | A small `install.sh` that runs the harness's own `agy plugin install` against a staging dir holding the manifest, the skills, and a generated `contextFileName` context file (the bootstrap). Everything arrives through the install mechanism — *not* by editing the user's config (see below). |
Then:
- **A plugin installer may silently strip *undeclared* files — so make the
bootstrap a file the installer *recognizes*, never a user-config edit.** A
`plugin install` typically copies only the components it knows about
(skills/agents/commands/mcp/hooks/context) and discards anything else, so a
context file the manifest doesn't declare just vanishes from the install. The
fix is **not** to give up and write into the user's config (**rule 2**) — it's
to declare the bootstrap as a recognized component. In escalation order:
- **Ship a context file the manifest declares.** If the harness has a
`contextFileName`-style field (an extension-declared file it loads every
session), that is the strongest clean bootstrap: declare it, and the installer
preserves it *and* the harness loads it. Generate it at install time from the
live `using-superpowers/SKILL.md` + the tool mapping (wrapped in
`<EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>`) so the installed bootstrap never drifts. This is what
`.antigravity-plugin/install.sh` does — `agy plugin install` reports
`✔ context : ANTIGRAVITY.md`, and a clean session reads `using-superpowers`'s
SKILL.md, loads `brainstorming`, and enters the brainstorming flow before any
code. **Verify with a marker** that the installer keeps the file and the
harness loads it: one porter wrongly concluded it couldn't, because they
shipped the file *without* declaring `contextFileName` and it was stripped as
unrecognized.
- **Otherwise lean on the installed `using-superpowers` skill itself.** If the
harness surfaces each installed skill's name + description at session start,
the `using-superpowers` description ("Use when starting any conversation…")
can prompt the model to load it — installing the skill *is* the bootstrap.
Softer (no guaranteed wrapper; it carries triggering but not the tool mapping
— see Step 5), so prefer the declared context file when available.
- If neither works, the harness cannot be cleanly supported yet — **say so**
and raise it, rather than hand-editing the user's config.
- **Write install docs.** A `docs/README.<harness>.md` and/or a
`.<harness>/INSTALL.md` (see `docs/README.opencode.md` and
`.opencode/INSTALL.md`), plus an install section in the top-level `README.md`.
The only supported install action is **running the harness's own install
command** (`agy plugin install`, `gemini extensions install`, `/plugin
install`, etc.). Hand-copying skill files and editing the user's global/personal
config are *both* off-limits (rule 2 / the PR rules). If the harness has no
install command at all — its only surface is a user-owned config file — then it
fails the "deliver via install mechanism" rule, and you should raise that rather
than ship an installer that edits the user's files.
- **Register the version.** If your harness introduces a *new* versioned
manifest, add its path and version field to `.version-bump.json` so
`scripts/bump-version.sh` keeps it in lockstep (read that file to see what's
currently tracked). A new manifest that isn't registered there will ship a
stale version. If your harness instead rides an already-tracked file — pi
declares itself in the repo-root `package.json`, which is already listed —
there's nothing new to add.
- **If no existing channel fits, you're standing up a new one.** None of the four
rows may match your harness. If it needs a Codex-style external fork sync,
`scripts/sync-to-codex-plugin.sh` is the template to clone (note its anchored
include/exclude list and its PR automation). And whenever you add a new
per-harness directory, add it to the *other* harnesses' sync excludes (e.g. the
EXCLUDES list in `sync-to-codex-plugin.sh`) so your dotdir doesn't leak into
their distributions.
---
## Part 7 — Cross-platform / Windows
Only relevant to the shell-hook shape. `hooks/run-hook.cmd` is a polyglot: a
single file that's valid as both a Windows batch script and a Unix shell script.
On Windows, `cmd.exe` runs the batch portion, which locates `bash` (Git for
Windows, then `bash` on PATH) and runs the named hook script; if no bash is
found it exits cleanly so the harness still works, just without injection. On
Unix, the leading `:` makes the batch block a no-op and the shell runs the
script directly.
Two rules this enforces, which you must respect:
- **Hook scripts are extensionless** (`session-start`, not `session-start.sh`).
Claude Code's Windows handling prepends `bash` to any command containing
`.sh`, which would double-invoke. Name your hook script without an extension.
- Don't write per-OS variants of the hook script. One extensionless bash script
plus the polyglot wrapper covers all three platforms.
`hooks/run-hook.cmd` itself is the authoritative implementation — read it. See
`docs/windows/polyglot-hooks.md` for the background and rationale behind the
dispatcher pattern.
---
## Part 8 — Submitting the PR
- Target the **`dev`** branch. One harness per PR.
- Fill in the PR template's **"New harness support"** section and paste the
complete acceptance-test transcript (the "Let's make a react todo list"
session showing `brainstorming` auto-triggering). A PR without this proof will
be closed.
- Superpowers is a zero-dependency plugin. Don't add a third-party runtime
dependency. Adding a new harness is the one carve-out the contributor rules
allow, and even then keep it to what the integration strictly requires —
type-only imports that compile away are fine; runtime packages are not.
- Don't touch skill bodies (Part 1). If you found yourself editing a `SKILL.md`
to make the port work, the fix belongs in your tool mapping instead.
---
## Appendix A — Reference integrations (current)
Use this as the live index; when in doubt, read the files, not this table.
| Harness | Entry point | Bootstrap mechanism | Tool mapping | Tests | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | `.claude-plugin/plugin.json` + `hooks/hooks.json` | shell hook → `hooks/session-start` (`hookSpecificOutput.additionalContext`) | native `Skill` tool; `references/claude-code-tools.md` | `tests/hooks/` | marketplace |
| Codex | `.codex-plugin/plugin.json` + `hooks/hooks-codex.json` | shell hook → `hooks/session-start-codex` | `references/codex-tools.md` | `tests/codex-plugin-sync/`, `tests/hooks/` | fork sync (`scripts/sync-to-codex-plugin.sh`) |
| Cursor | `.cursor-plugin/plugin.json` + `hooks/hooks-cursor.json` | shell hook → `hooks/session-start` (`additional_context`) | `references/claude-code-tools.md` | `tests/hooks/` | hand-authored |
| Copilot CLI | (shares Claude Code hook path; `COPILOT_CLI` env) | shell hook → `hooks/session-start` (`additionalContext`) | `references/copilot-tools.md` | `tests/hooks/` | — |
| Gemini CLI | `gemini-extension.json` + `GEMINI.md` | instructions file `@`-includes bootstrap + mapping | `references/gemini-tools.md` | — | `gemini extensions install` |
| OpenCode | `.opencode/plugins/superpowers.js` (declared via root `package.json` `main`) | in-process: `config` hook registers skills dir; `experimental.chat.messages.transform` injects user message | inline in `superpowers.js` | `tests/opencode/` | `opencode.json` plugin git URL |
| pi | `.pi/extensions/superpowers.ts` | in-process: `resources_discover` registers skills; `context` event injects user message; lifecycle-flag + compaction-aware | `piToolMapping()` inline **and** `references/pi-tools.md` | `tests/pi/` | repo-root `package.json` fields |
## Appendix B — Gotchas that have bitten porters
- **Opt-in isn't a port.** If your human partner has to do anything per session
to get Superpowers, the acceptance test fails. Re-read Part 2.
- **Wrong JSON field → silent failure or double injection.** Shape A only.
Confirm the exact field/nesting; Claude Code reads two fields without dedup.
- **Hook-config schema varies per harness.** Shape A. Cursor's `hooks-cursor.json`
looks nothing like the Claude/Codex one (`version`, lowercase `sessionStart`,
relative command, no `matcher`/`type`/`async`). Match the closest existing file.
- **Plugin-root env var differs per harness.** Shape A. The hook command uses
`${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}` (Claude), `${PLUGIN_ROOT}` (Codex), or a relative path
(Cursor). Use what your harness exports; the script re-derives the root itself.
- **System-message injection.** Shape B injects a *user* message on purpose
(#750, #894). Don't "fix" it to a system message.
- **Per-step vs per-turn callbacks.** OpenCode fires every step (per-call dedup
guard); pi fires per turn (lifecycle flag + `agent_end` reset). Copying one
harness's dedup strategy onto the other's callback frequency breaks injection.
- **Message-object shape is per-harness.** Shape B. pi and OpenCode use
incompatible shapes; discover yours, don't copy a reference's object literal.
- **Hunting for a skill-registration API that doesn't exist.** A harness with no
skill system (not just no `Skill` tool) has nothing to register — the model
reads `SKILL.md` on demand. Don't assume a `skillPaths` equivalent exists.
- **Mapping in two places.** For in-process plugins the mapping may live both
inline and in a `references/` file (pi). Update both.
- **The "never read skill files" line.** It means "don't bypass your platform's
skill-loading mechanism," not "never use file-read." On a no-skill-tool harness
that mechanism *is* reading `SKILL.md` — say so explicitly in the mapping
(Part 5).
- **`.sh` on Windows.** Keep hook scripts extensionless (Part 7).
- **Unregistered version.** A new manifest not added to `.version-bump.json`
ships stale (Part 6).
- **Editing skills to fit the harness.** Never. The fix goes in the tool mapping.

View File

@@ -555,6 +555,8 @@ Should show exactly 6 files changed (5 skill files + 1 test file). No other file
If test runner exists:
```bash
# Run skill-triggering tests
# Note: tests/skill-triggering/ was lifted into drill scenarios on 2026-05-06.
# See evals/scenarios/triggering-*.yaml. The reference below is a dated artifact.
./tests/skill-triggering/run-all.sh 2>/dev/null || echo "Skill triggering tests not available in this environment"
# Run SDD integration test

View File

@@ -275,23 +275,16 @@ If no native tool is available, create a worktree manually using git.
Follow this priority order:
1. **Check existing directories:**
1. **Check your instructions for a worktree directory preference.** If specified, use it without asking.
2. **Check existing project-local directories:**
```bash
ls -d .worktrees 2>/dev/null # Preferred (hidden)
ls -d worktrees 2>/dev/null # Alternative
```
If found, use that directory. If both exist, `.worktrees` wins.
2. **Check for existing global directory:**
```bash
project=$(basename "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)")
ls -d ~/.config/superpowers/worktrees/$project 2>/dev/null
```
If found, use it (backward compatibility with legacy global path).
3. **Check your instructions for a worktree directory preference.** If specified, use it without asking.
4. **Default to `.worktrees/`.**
3. **Default to `.worktrees/`.**
#### Safety Verification (project-local directories only)
@@ -305,16 +298,11 @@ git check-ignore -q .worktrees 2>/dev/null || git check-ignore -q worktrees 2>/d
**Why critical:** Prevents accidentally committing worktree contents to repository.
Global directories (`~/.config/superpowers/worktrees/`) need no verification.
#### Create the Worktree
```bash
project=$(basename "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)")
# Determine path based on chosen location
# For project-local: path="$LOCATION/$BRANCH_NAME"
# For global: path="~/.config/superpowers/worktrees/$project/$BRANCH_NAME"
path="$LOCATION/$BRANCH_NAME"
git worktree add "$path" -b "$BRANCH_NAME"
cd "$path"
@@ -387,7 +375,6 @@ Ready to implement <feature-name>
| `worktrees/` exists | Use it (verify ignored) |
| Both exist | Use `.worktrees/` |
| Neither exists | Check instruction file, then default `.worktrees/` |
| Global path exists | Use it (backward compat) |
| Directory not ignored | Add to .gitignore + commit |
| Permission error on create | Sandbox fallback, work in place |
| Tests fail during baseline | Report failures + ask |
@@ -464,7 +451,7 @@ git commit -m "feat: rewrite using-git-worktrees with detect-and-defer (PRI-974)
Step 0: GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON detection (skip if already isolated)
Step 0 consent: opt-in prompt before creating worktree (#991)
Step 1a: native tool preference (short, first, declarative)
Step 1b: git worktree fallback with hooks symlink and legacy path compat
Step 1b: git worktree fallback with project-local directory policy
Submodule guard prevents false detection
Platform-neutral instruction file references (#1049)"
```
@@ -663,7 +650,7 @@ WORKTREE_PATH=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
**If `GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON`:** Normal repo, no worktree to clean up. Done.
**If worktree path is under `.worktrees/` or `~/.config/superpowers/worktrees/`:** Superpowers created this worktree — we own cleanup.
**If worktree path is under `.worktrees/` or `worktrees/`:** Superpowers created this worktree — we own cleanup.
```bash
MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel)
@@ -707,7 +694,7 @@ git worktree prune # Self-healing: clean up any stale registrations
**Cleaning up harness-owned worktrees**
- **Problem:** Removing a worktree the harness created causes phantom state
- **Fix:** Only clean up worktrees under `.worktrees/` or `~/.config/superpowers/worktrees/`
- **Fix:** Only clean up worktrees under `.worktrees/` or `worktrees/`
**No confirmation for discard**
- **Problem:** Accidentally delete work

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
# Pi Extension and Evals Implementation Plan
> **For agentic workers:** REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:subagent-driven-development (recommended) or superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task. Steps use checkbox (`- [ ]`) syntax for tracking.
**Goal:** Add first-class Pi package support for Superpowers and add Pi as a Drill eval backend.
**Architecture:** The Pi package is declared in the root `package.json` and loads existing `skills/` plus a small Pi extension. The extension injects the `using-superpowers` bootstrap into provider context as a user-role message on session startup and after compaction, with Pi-specific tool mapping. Drill gains a `pi` backend, Pi session-log normalization, and tests.
**Tech Stack:** Pi TypeScript extension API, Node built-in test runner, Drill Python eval harness, pytest.
---
### Task 1: Pi package manifest and extension tests
**Files:**
- Modify: `package.json`
- Create: `tests/pi/test-pi-extension.mjs`
- [ ] **Step 1: Write failing package/extension tests**
Create `tests/pi/test-pi-extension.mjs` with tests that import `extensions/superpowers.ts`, register fake Pi handlers, and assert:
- root `package.json` has `keywords` containing `pi-package`
- root `package.json` has `pi.skills: ["./skills"]`
- root `package.json` has `pi.extensions: ["./extensions/superpowers.ts"]`
- the extension registers `resources_discover`, `session_start`, `session_compact`, `context`, and `agent_end`
- startup `context` injects exactly one user-role bootstrap message
- `agent_end` clears startup injection
- `session_compact` re-enables injection
- the extension does not register `session_before_compact`
- [ ] **Step 2: Run tests and verify RED**
Run: `node --experimental-strip-types --test tests/pi/test-pi-extension.mjs`
Expected: FAIL because `extensions/superpowers.ts` does not exist and `package.json` lacks the `pi` manifest.
- [ ] **Step 3: Implement manifest fields**
Update `package.json` with `description`, `keywords`, `pi.extensions`, and `pi.skills` while preserving existing `name`, `version`, `type`, and `main`.
- [ ] **Step 4: Implement `extensions/superpowers.ts`**
Create a zero-runtime-dependency extension that:
- locates the package root from `import.meta.url`
- reads `skills/using-superpowers/SKILL.md`
- strips YAML frontmatter
- appends Pi-specific tool mapping
- exposes `resources_discover` with the skills path
- marks bootstrap pending on `session_start` and `session_compact`
- injects a user-role bootstrap message in `context`
- inserts post-compact bootstrap after leading `compactionSummary` messages
- clears pending bootstrap on `agent_end`
- [ ] **Step 5: Run tests and verify GREEN**
Run: `node --experimental-strip-types --test tests/pi/test-pi-extension.mjs`
Expected: PASS.
### Task 2: Pi tool mapping reference
**Files:**
- Create: `skills/using-superpowers/references/pi-tools.md`
- Modify: `tests/pi/test-pi-extension.mjs`
- [ ] **Step 1: Write failing test for Pi reference doc**
Add assertions that `skills/using-superpowers/references/pi-tools.md` exists and documents mappings for `Skill`, `Task`, `TodoWrite`, and built-in tool names.
- [ ] **Step 2: Run tests and verify RED**
Run: `node --experimental-strip-types --test tests/pi/test-pi-extension.mjs`
Expected: FAIL because `pi-tools.md` does not exist.
- [ ] **Step 3: Add Pi reference doc**
Create `skills/using-superpowers/references/pi-tools.md` explaining Pi-native skills, optional `pi-subagents`, no canonical todo/tasklist plugin, and built-in lowercase tools.
- [ ] **Step 4: Run tests and verify GREEN**
Run: `node --experimental-strip-types --test tests/pi/test-pi-extension.mjs`
Expected: PASS.
### Task 3: Drill Pi backend and session log normalization
**Files:**
- Create: `evals/backends/pi.yaml`
- Modify: `evals/drill/backend.py`
- Modify: `evals/drill/engine.py`
- Modify: `evals/drill/normalizer.py`
- Modify: `evals/tests/test_backend.py`
- Modify: `evals/tests/test_normalizer.py`
- [ ] **Step 1: Write failing backend/normalizer tests**
Add pytest coverage for:
- `load_backend("pi")` returns `family == "pi"`
- Pi backend command starts with `pi` and includes `-e ${SUPERPOWERS_ROOT}`
- `_resolve_log_dir()` for Pi points under `~/.pi/agent/sessions`
- `filter_pi_logs_by_cwd()` keeps only session files whose header `cwd` matches the scenario workdir
- `normalize_pi_logs()` extracts `toolCall` blocks from Pi assistant session entries and maps built-in lowercase tools to canonical names
- [ ] **Step 2: Run tests and verify RED**
Run: `uv run pytest evals/tests/test_backend.py evals/tests/test_normalizer.py -q`
Expected: FAIL because the Pi backend and normalizer do not exist.
- [ ] **Step 3: Add `evals/backends/pi.yaml`**
Configure the backend to run `pi -e ${SUPERPOWERS_ROOT}`, use permissive TUI readiness, `/quit` shutdown, and Pi session log location.
- [ ] **Step 4: Implement Pi family support**
Update `Backend.family`, `Engine._resolve_log_dir`, `Engine._collect_tool_calls`, and `normalizer.py` with Pi log filtering and normalizing.
- [ ] **Step 5: Run tests and verify GREEN**
Run: `uv run pytest evals/tests/test_backend.py evals/tests/test_normalizer.py -q`
Expected: PASS.
### Task 4: Documentation and full verification
**Files:**
- Modify: `README.md`
- Modify: `evals/README.md`
- [ ] **Step 1: Document Pi install and eval backend**
Add Pi to README quickstart/install list and add backend entry/usage to `evals/README.md`.
- [ ] **Step 2: Run verification**
Run:
```bash
node --experimental-strip-types --test tests/pi/test-pi-extension.mjs
uv run pytest evals/tests/test_backend.py evals/tests/test_setup.py evals/tests/test_normalizer.py -q
```
Expected: all tests pass.

View File

@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ The skill describes the goal ("ensure work happens in an isolated workspace") an
### Provenance-based ownership
Whoever creates the worktree owns its cleanup. If the harness created it, superpowers doesn't touch it. If superpowers created it (via git fallback), superpowers cleans it up. The heuristic: if the worktree lives under `.worktrees/` or `~/.config/superpowers/worktrees/`, superpowers owns it. Anything else (`.claude/worktrees/`, `~/.codex/worktrees/`, `.gemini/worktrees/`) belongs to the harness.
Whoever creates the worktree owns its cleanup. If the harness created it, superpowers doesn't touch it. If superpowers created it (via git fallback), superpowers cleans it up. The heuristic: if the worktree lives under `.worktrees/` or `worktrees/`, superpowers owns it. Anything else (`.claude/worktrees/`, `~/.codex/worktrees/`, `.gemini/worktrees/`, or old user-global Superpowers paths) belongs to the harness or user and is left alone.
## Design
@@ -110,12 +110,11 @@ File splitting (Step 1b in a separate skill) was tested and proven unnecessary.
When no native tool is available, create a worktree manually.
**Directory selection** (priority order):
1. Check for existing `.worktrees/` or `worktrees/` directory — if found, use it. If both exist, `.worktrees/` wins.
2. Check for existing `~/.config/superpowers/worktrees/<project>/` directory — if found, use it (backward compatibility with legacy global path).
3. Check the project's agent instruction file (CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, AGENTS.md, .cursorrules, or equivalent) for a worktree directory preference.
4. Default to `.worktrees/`.
1. Check the project's agent instruction file (CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, AGENTS.md, .cursorrules, or equivalent) for a worktree directory preference.
2. Check for existing `.worktrees/` or `worktrees/` directory — if found, use it. If both exist, `.worktrees/` wins.
3. Default to `.worktrees/`.
No interactive directory selection prompt. The global path (`~/.config/superpowers/worktrees/`) is no longer offered as a choice to new users, but existing worktrees at that location are detected and used for backward compatibility.
No interactive directory selection prompt. Old user-global Superpowers worktree paths are not detected or offered; new manual worktrees are project-local unless the user explicitly specifies another location.
**Safety verification** (project-local directories only):
@@ -232,7 +231,7 @@ if GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON:
# Normal repo, no worktree to clean up
done
if worktree path is under .worktrees/ or ~/.config/superpowers/worktrees/:
if worktree path is under .worktrees/ or worktrees/:
# Superpowers created it — we own cleanup
cd to main repo root # Bug #238 fix
git worktree remove <path>
@@ -318,7 +317,7 @@ As of 2026-04-06, Claude Code is the only harness with an agent-callable mid-ses
### Provenance heuristic
The `.worktrees/` or `~/.config/superpowers/worktrees/` = ours, anything else = hands off` heuristic works for every current harness. If a future harness adopts `.worktrees/` as its convention, we'd have a false positive (superpowers tries to clean up a harness-owned worktree). Similarly, if a user manually runs `git worktree add .worktrees/experiment` without superpowers, we'd incorrectly claim ownership. Both are low risk — every harness uses branded paths, and manual `.worktrees/` creation is unlikely — but worth noting.
The `.worktrees/` or `worktrees/` = ours, anything else = hands off` heuristic works for every current harness. If a future harness adopts one of those project-local directories as its convention, we'd have a false positive (superpowers tries to clean up a harness-owned worktree). Similarly, if a user manually runs `git worktree add .worktrees/experiment` without superpowers, we'd incorrectly claim ownership. Both are low risk — every harness uses branded paths, and manual `.worktrees/` creation is unlikely — but worth noting.
### Detached HEAD finishing

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
# Platform-neutral config-file references — Phase B design
## Background
Phase A (see `2026-05-05-platform-neutral-prose-design.md`) replaced generic third-person "Claude" prose with agent-neutral forms. This phase tackles the next category: references to the per-platform instruction file (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, GEMINI.md) inside skills.
The plugin runs on multiple harnesses, and each one reads its own instruction file. Where a skill names CLAUDE.md as if it were the only file, that's a Claude-Code-centric assumption that doesn't hold on Codex / Gemini CLI / OpenCode.
## In scope
Two specific lines in active skills:
1. **`skills/writing-skills/SKILL.md:58`** — `Project-specific conventions (put in CLAUDE.md)`
2. **`skills/receiving-code-review/SKILL.md:30`** — `"You're absolutely right!" (explicit CLAUDE.md violation)`
## Out of scope
- **`skills/using-superpowers/SKILL.md:22, 26`** — instruction-priority list. The list already names all three (CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, AGENTS.md) inclusively, which is correct: the section is making a real claim about *what counts as user instruction* on a multi-platform plugin. No change needed.
- **Historical / example artifacts**:
- `skills/systematic-debugging/CREATION-LOG.md` — attribution path (`~/.claude/CLAUDE.md`) is a historical fact.
- `skills/writing-skills/examples/CLAUDE_MD_TESTING.md` — the entire file is a worked example testing CLAUDE.md content variants. The filename, body, and the reference from `testing-skills-with-subagents.md` all stay; normalizing them defeats the example.
- **Platform-tooling references** — Phase D candidates:
- `skills/using-superpowers/SKILL.md:40` (Gemini CLI tool mapping note about GEMINI.md)
- `skills/using-superpowers/references/gemini-tools.md` (`save_memory` persists to GEMINI.md)
## Substitution rules
Two distinct calls, one per in-scope line.
### Rule 1: "where to put project-specific conventions"
`writing-skills/SKILL.md:58`:
- **Before:** `Project-specific conventions (put in CLAUDE.md)`
- **After:** `Project-specific conventions (put in your instructions file)`
Use a generic phrase rather than picking one filename. Different harnesses read different files (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, GEMINI.md, etc.) and the skill should not assume one. The platform-tools reference docs (`references/{codex,copilot,gemini}-tools.md`) are the right place to name each platform's preferred file.
### Rule 2: the "(explicit CLAUDE.md violation)" parenthetical
`receiving-code-review/SKILL.md:30`:
- **Before:** `"You're absolutely right!" (explicit CLAUDE.md violation)`
- **After:** `"You're absolutely right!" (explicit instruction-file violation)`
The parenthetical is doing real work — it signals this phrase isn't just stylistically bad, it actively violates rules many users put in their instruction files. "Instruction file" is the natural cross-platform term covering AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md / GEMINI.md collectively, and keeps the original signal without picking one filename or softening to "common".
## Commit plan
Atomic commits, in order:
1. **`writing-skills/SKILL.md`** — CLAUDE.md → "your instructions file" in the "where to put project conventions" line
2. **`receiving-code-review/SKILL.md`** — CLAUDE.md → instruction-file in the violation parenthetical
3. **Platform-tools reference docs** — add the preferred per-platform instructions filename (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, GEMINI.md, etc.) to each `references/{codex,copilot,gemini}-tools.md` so readers can resolve "your instructions file" to a real filename.
Each commit message names "Phase B" and the slice.
## Verification
After each commit:
- Read the surrounding paragraph to confirm grammar and meaning still parse.
- `grep -n "CLAUDE\.md" <touched-file>` — no remaining hits in active prose (carve-outs already documented).
After both commits:
- `grep -rn "CLAUDE\.md" skills/` should return only the documented carve-outs (CREATION-LOG, CLAUDE_MD_TESTING and its inbound reference, the priority list in using-superpowers).
## Non-goals
- Do not touch the priority list ordering in `using-superpowers/SKILL.md`. Reordering CLAUDE.md / GEMINI.md / AGENTS.md is an aesthetic change, not a substitution, and out of scope here.
- Do not rename `examples/CLAUDE_MD_TESTING.md` or change its content.
- Do not modify Gemini-CLI-specific tooling references (Phase D candidates).
## Implementation note
Phase B as written here covered three commits and the three non-Claude-Code platform-tools refs. Implementation went one step further: a fourth ref, `references/claude-code-tools.md`, was added in commit `8505703` for symmetry, so Claude Code's instructions-file conventions and tool-name list live alongside the others rather than implicitly in the surrounding skill prose. That addition wasn't anticipated in this spec but is consistent with its intent.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
# Platform-neutral prose — Phase A design
## Background
Superpowers ships to multiple agent runtimes (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, Copilot CLI, Gemini CLI). Skill content and supporting docs were written first for Claude Code and use "Claude" in places where any runtime's agent applies. OpenAI's vendored fork (openai/plugins#217) attempted a wholesale rewrite that was actively wrong in places — rewriting historical attribution paths, model names, and platform-specific install instructions — and we want to avoid that mistake while still removing platform-centric prose where it is genuinely incidental.
The full effort is broken into phases by reference category. **This spec covers Phase A only:** generic third-person prose mentioning "Claude" in non-platform-specific contexts. Later phases (config-file references, marketing copy, tool-name references) are out of scope here and will get their own specs.
## In scope
Generic prose mentions of "Claude" in:
- `skills/*/SKILL.md` and supporting `.md` files in active skill directories
- `skills/writing-skills/anthropic-best-practices.md`
- `README.md` (only where the mention is generic prose, not platform marketing)
Plus one coined-term rename: **Claude Search Optimization (CSO) → Skill Discovery Optimization (SDO)** in `skills/writing-skills/SKILL.md`.
## Out of scope
- **Platform/runtime statements** — "In Claude Code:", install instructions, tool-mapping references. (Phase D candidate.)
- **Config-file references** — CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, GEMINI.md priority lists and "where to put project conventions" callouts. (Phase B.)
- **Tool-name references** — `Skill`, `Bash`, `Read`, `Task`, `TodoWrite`. Skills are written in Claude Code's tool vocabulary; the existing `references/{codex,copilot,gemini}-tools.md` files map them. (At the time this spec was written, the plan was to defer or skip these. Phase E ended up doing them — replacing tool names with action language across active skills and unifying the platform-tools refs around the same vocabulary.)
- **Marketing copy** in README — "Superpowers for Claude Code", platform-named install sections. (Phase C.)
- **Historical artifacts** — `docs/plans/*.md`, `docs/superpowers/specs/*.md`, `CREATION-LOG.md`. These are dated, point-in-time documents; rewriting them rewrites history.
- **Model identifiers** — Claude Haiku / Sonnet / Opus. These are real product names.
- **Filename / URL references** — `CLAUDE.md`, `claude.com`, `claude-plugin/`, paths under `~/.claude/`.
- **`anthropic-best-practices.md` filename** — the file remains named after its source even though we rewrite the prose inside it.
## Replacement style
Use a mix that reads naturally in English:
- **Second person — "your agent"** when addressing the skill author about *their* runtime
- "your agent reads the description"
- **Third person — "the agent" / "agents" / "an agent"** when describing system behavior generically
- "Future agents find your skills"
- "Use words an agent would search for"
- "Agents read SKILL.md only when the skill becomes relevant"
Pick whichever fits the surrounding sentence; do not force consistency at the cost of awkward phrasing. Pluralize when natural ("future agents", "agents read") rather than always saying "the agent".
### Carve-outs that stay as "Claude"
- Model names: Claude Haiku, Claude Sonnet, Claude Opus
- Filenames and URLs: `CLAUDE.md`, `claude.com`, `~/.claude/`
- Branded platform name "Claude Code" wherever it refers to the runtime as such (handled in later phases)
### Coined-term rename
- **Claude Search Optimization (CSO) → Skill Discovery Optimization (SDO)**
- Appears in `skills/writing-skills/SKILL.md` as a section heading and in nearby prose. Rename the heading, the acronym, and any in-file cross-references.
## Files affected
Approximate counts based on a `grep` filtered to exclude carve-outs:
| File | Generic-prose mentions |
|------|------------------------|
| `skills/writing-skills/SKILL.md` | ~12 (includes CSO heading + body) |
| `skills/writing-skills/anthropic-best-practices.md` | ~30 |
| `skills/writing-skills/examples/CLAUDE_MD_TESTING.md` | ~1 — filename stays (it's a CLAUDE.md test artifact); the "Variant C: Claude.AI Emphatic Style" heading also stays (it's a label naming a specific style) |
| `README.md` | ~1 |
Final list confirmed during implementation by re-running the filtered grep.
## Commit plan
Four atomic commits, in order:
1. **Rename CSO → SDO** in `skills/writing-skills/SKILL.md`. Mechanical, isolated, easy to revert if we change our minds about the term.
2. **Active skills prose** — generic "Claude" → "agent" forms across `skills/*/SKILL.md` and supporting `.md`, excluding `anthropic-best-practices.md`.
3. **`anthropic-best-practices.md` prose** — same substitution rules. Separate commit because this file is a vendored adaptation of an external doc; isolating the change makes future reconciliation with upstream easier to read.
4. **README.md prose** *(only if any generic-prose mentions remain after filtering)*. Skipped if empty.
Each commit message names the phase ("Phase A") and the slice ("rename CSO to SDO", "agent prose in active skills", etc.) so the series is self-documenting.
## Verification
After each commit:
- `grep -rn "Claude" <touched-paths>` — every remaining hit must fall into a documented carve-out (model name, filename, URL, "Claude Code" platform name, historical artifact).
- Read the touched file end-to-end — substitutions should not have broken sentence flow, pronoun agreement, or list parallelism.
- No tests to run; this is prose-only.
After the final commit:
- Skim each modified skill in a live session to confirm nothing reads awkwardly.
## Non-goals
- Do not change behavior, structure, headings (other than CSO→SDO), examples, code blocks, or YAML frontmatter.
- Do not introduce new sections, callouts, or compatibility notes.
- Do not "improve" prose beyond the substitution while editing.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
# Platform-neutral README ordering — Phase C design
## Background
Phases A and B (see `2026-05-05-platform-neutral-prose-design.md` and `2026-05-05-platform-neutral-config-refs-design.md`) already neutralized generic Claude prose and config-file references in the README. The remaining platform-leaning signal is layout: the README's two platform listings put Claude Code first and aren't strictly alphabetical elsewhere.
This phase fixes the ordering. No prose changes.
## In scope
1. **Quickstart platform list** (`README.md:7`) — the inline link list of supported harnesses
2. **Installation section ordering** (`README.md:35152`) — the per-harness install sub-sections
## Out of scope
- Prose, marketplace names, plugin IDs, URLs — all factually correct as-is.
- Visual weight of the Claude Code section (which has two sub-sections — official Anthropic marketplace and Superpowers marketplace). Both are real install paths; collapsing them would hide accurate info.
- Section headings and content within each install block — only the ordering of the blocks changes.
## Substitution
Both listings reorder to strict alphabetical:
| Old order | New order |
|-----------|-----------|
| Claude Code | Claude Code |
| Codex CLI | Codex App |
| Codex App | Codex CLI |
| Factory Droid | Cursor |
| Gemini CLI | Factory Droid |
| OpenCode | Gemini CLI |
| Cursor | GitHub Copilot CLI |
| GitHub Copilot CLI | OpenCode |
Three moves: Codex App swaps with Codex CLI; Cursor moves up two slots; GitHub Copilot CLI moves up one.
Claude Code remains first by alphabetical chance (`Cl…` precedes `Co…`).
## Commit plan
One atomic commit covering both listings, since changing one without the other would create inconsistency between the quickstart and the installation section.
## Verification
- Quickstart anchors (`#claude-code`, `#codex-app`, etc.) still resolve to existing `### …` headings — no headings renamed.
- Each install sub-section's body is byte-identical pre/post; only positions changed.
- `git diff README.md` shows section moves only, no content edits.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,247 @@
# Lift drill into superpowers as `evals/` — design
## Background
Drill is a Python skill-compliance benchmark that lives in its own repo at `obra/drill`. It drives real tmux sessions, runs an LLM actor as a simulated user, runs an LLM verifier on the resulting transcript, and reports pass/fail per scenario. It supports Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, and (per recent commits) OpenCode and Copilot CLI.
Drill is already the *de facto* eval harness for superpowers. The PRI-1397 commit series in the drill repo lifted ~22 superpowers bash tests into drill scenarios, and the most recent superpowers commit (`a2292c5`) explicitly removed a redundant bash test with the message *"replaced by drill behavioral coverage"*. Migration momentum exists; this spec completes it.
This work moves drill into superpowers under `evals/`, deletes the redundant bash tests after per-file verification of drill scenario coverage, and updates docs so contributors land on the new structure.
## Goals
1. `evals/` is the canonical eval harness in superpowers — full drill source, scenarios, fixtures, prompts, backend configs, and tests.
2. Bash tests in `superpowers/tests/` that have been individually verified as 100% covered by drill scenarios are deleted; the rest are preserved.
3. The split between `tests/` (plugin infrastructure: bash + node + python integration tests) and `evals/` (LLM behavior with actor + verifier) is meaningful and documented.
4. Top-level docs (`README.md`, `CLAUDE.md`, `docs/testing.md`) point contributors at the right place.
5. The standalone `obra/drill` repo continues to exist (this PR does not touch it) and gets archived as a separate manual step after this PR merges.
## Non-goals
- **CI integration.** Manual-only here. The natural follow-up is "tiered": fast subset on every PR, full sweep nightly + on-demand. That requires API budget decisions, GitHub Actions secrets, and a runner image with `tmux` + `node` + `python` + `claude` / `codex` / `gemini` CLIs installed. Out of scope.
- **Scenario co-location with skills.** Scenarios stay centralized at `evals/scenarios/`. If we later decide each skill should own its scenarios, that's a path-find-and-rename operation; the YAML format does not change.
- **Renaming the internal Python package** (`drill``evals`). The directory is `evals/` (user-facing); the Python package keeps its `drill` name to keep the diff small. A short note in `evals/README.md` explains.
- **Drill repo archival.** This PR does not touch `obra/drill`. After merge, the drill repo is archived manually (read-only on GitHub, README pointer to `obra/superpowers/evals/`).
- **Lifting `tests/claude-code/analyze-token-usage.py` into `evals/bin/`.** Useful utility, not test code. Can move later; not required by this PR.
## Branching
Branch off `dev` as `f/evals-lift`. This work is independent of the open `f/cross-platform` PR — no shared file changes besides possibly `README.md`, which is small enough to resolve at merge time if it conflicts.
## Architecture after the move
```
superpowers/
evals/ ← NEW (full drill copy)
pyproject.toml (Python 3.11, uv-managed)
uv.lock
.gitignore (drill's own; results/, .venv/, .env)
README.md (was drill's README; install instructions updated)
CLAUDE.md (was drill's CLAUDE.md; paths updated)
docs/
design.md (drill's design — preserved verbatim, cross-linked from this spec)
manual-testing.md
pressure-and-red-testing.md
drill/ (Python package; name kept; cli, engine, actor, verifier, etc.)
backends/ (claude-*.yaml, codex.yaml, gemini.yaml)
scenarios/ (32+ YAML scenarios)
setup_helpers/ (15 Python helpers; create_base_repo, sdd_*, spec_*, worktree, etc.)
fixtures/ (template-repo, sdd-go-fractals, sdd-svelte-todo)
prompts/ (actor.md, verifier.md)
bin/ (assertion helper scripts: tool-called, tool-count, etc.)
tests/ (drill's own pytest suite)
tests/ ← bash tests preserved by default
brainstorm-server/ ← KEEP (node tests for brainstorm-server JS code)
opencode/ ← KEEP (plugin loading tests)
codex-plugin-sync/ ← KEEP (sync verification)
claude-code/ ← MOSTLY KEEP — see deletion gate
explicit-skill-requests/ ← KEEP unless verified replaced
skill-triggering/ ← KEEP unless verified replaced
subagent-driven-dev/ ← KEEP unless verified replaced
docs/
testing.md ← UPDATED (split into "Plugin tests" + "Skill behavior evals")
superpowers/
specs/
2026-05-06-lift-drill-into-evals-design.md ← THIS SPEC
README.md ← small Contributing-section pointer to evals/
CLAUDE.md ← one-line "Eval harness lives at evals/" pointer
```
The `tests/` and `evals/` directories serve clearly distinct roles after this PR:
- **`tests/`** — does the plugin's non-LLM code work? Unit and integration tests for the brainstorm-server JS code, OpenCode plugin loading, codex-plugin-sync sync verification. Bash + node + python.
- **`evals/`** — do agents behave correctly on real LLM sessions? Drill scenarios with actor + verifier. Python-only, runs real tmux sessions.
## Deletion gate (per bash test)
A bash test is deleted *only if* a drill scenario verifiably covers every assertion it makes. The implementation plan documents this verification per file: read the bash test, list its checks, find the drill scenario, confirm each check has a matching `verify.assertions` or `verify.criteria` entry. If even one check is missing, the option is to either extend the drill scenario or keep the bash test. Default keeps it.
**Tentative coverage map** (commit-message-based; needs per-file verification before any deletion):
| Bash test | Claimed drill replacement | Coverage status |
|-----------|---------------------------|-----------------|
| `tests/skill-triggering/prompts/*` (6 prompt files) | `triggering-*.yaml` (6 scenarios) | candidate — verify per-prompt before deleting |
| `tests/skill-triggering/run-test.sh`, `run-all.sh` | n/a (runners, not tests) | **keep** — runner scripts |
| `tests/explicit-skill-requests/prompts/please-use-brainstorming.txt` | needs verification — drill has no obvious counterpart yet | likely **keep** unless drill scenario added |
| `tests/explicit-skill-requests/prompts/use-systematic-debugging.txt` | needs verification — drill has no obvious counterpart | likely **keep** unless drill scenario added |
| `tests/explicit-skill-requests/run-claude-describes-sdd.sh` | partially → `mid-conversation-skill-invocation.yaml` | candidate — verify per-script |
| `tests/explicit-skill-requests/run-haiku-test.sh` | no drill scenario covers Haiku-specific behavior | **keep** |
| `tests/explicit-skill-requests/run-multiturn-test.sh`, `run-extended-multiturn-test.sh` | no drill scenario covers multi-turn build-up | **keep** unless drill scenarios added |
| `tests/explicit-skill-requests/run-test.sh`, `run-all.sh` | n/a (runners) | **keep** |
| `tests/subagent-driven-dev/go-fractals/`, `tests/subagent-driven-dev/svelte-todo/` | `sdd-go-fractals.yaml`, `sdd-svelte-todo.yaml` | candidate — verify before deleting (these include real assertions about test suites passing) |
| `tests/claude-code/test-document-review-system.sh` | `spec-reviewer-catches-planted-flaws.yaml` | candidate — verify before deleting |
| `tests/claude-code/test-requesting-code-review.sh` | `code-review-catches-planted-bugs.yaml` | candidate — verify before deleting |
| `tests/claude-code/test-subagent-driven-development-integration.sh` | `sdd-rejects-extra-features.yaml` (YAGNI subset) | **partial** — bash test also asserts ≥3 commits / `npm test` passes / runs `analyze-token-usage.py`. Drill scenario asserts forbidden-exports + reviewer-as-gate. Mostly disjoint — almost certainly **keep + extend drill scenario**. |
| `tests/claude-code/test-subagent-driven-development.sh` | meta/documentation test (asks agent to *describe* SDD); no drill scenario covers description tests | **keep** unless drill scenario added |
| `tests/claude-code/test-worktree-native-preference.sh` | `worktree-creation-under-pressure.yaml` | candidate — verify before deleting |
| `tests/claude-code/test-helpers.sh`, `run-skill-tests.sh`, `analyze-token-usage.py` | n/a (utilities, not tests) | **keep** — libraries/tools |
## Verification protocol (subagent-gated)
Every change in the implementation plan gets cross-checked by an independent subagent before commit.
| Change category | Subagent verification |
|----------------|----------------------|
| Each bash-test deletion | Dispatch a subagent with: (a) the bash test file content, (b) the candidate drill scenario YAML, (c) the prompt: *"List every assertion the bash test makes. List every verify entry in the drill scenario. For each bash assertion, find a matching drill check or report it as unmatched. Output a per-assertion table."* The subagent's output is the gate — only delete if every bash assertion has a match. |
| Initial `evals/` copy | Subagent verifies: (a) drill SHA being copied is recorded in the lift commit message so provenance is auditable; (b) **per-file SHA-256 checksum** matches drill repo for every file (not just file count); (c) excluded paths (`.git/`, `.venv/`, `results/`, `.env`, `__pycache__/`, `*.egg-info/`, any `.private-journal/`) are absent from `evals/`; (d) all backend YAMLs reference paths that exist post-move; (e) `pyproject.toml`, `uv.lock`, `.gitignore` are intact. |
| Drill's own pytest suite | Subagent runs `cd evals && uv run pytest` after the path-default change. Drill ships its own pytest suite at `evals/tests/` including `test_backend.py` which exercises `SUPERPOWERS_ROOT` env-var behavior — these tests must update to match the helper and continue to pass. |
| Reference scrubbing after deletion | Subagent greps the entire superpowers tree (excluding `node_modules/`, `.venv/`, and `evals/`) for references to deleted bash test paths. Search targets: `docs/`, `docs/superpowers/plans/`, `RELEASE-NOTES.md`, `CLAUDE.md`, `GEMINI.md`, `AGENTS.md`, `README.md`, `.github/`, `scripts/`, `.opencode/INSTALL.md`, `.codex-plugin/INSTALL.md`, `lefthook.yml`. Any hit is either updated or surfaces a missed dependency. |
| Path defaults change (`SUPERPOWERS_ROOT` default) | Subagent runs at least one cheap drill scenario after the path changes (e.g., `triggering-test-driven-development`) and confirms it still passes. Real validation, not just code review. |
| Final pre-PR adversarial review | Two subagents in parallel, "5 points to whoever finds the most legitimate issues" framing — same protocol used on the cross-platform PR. Verify both source code and behavior. |
Each subagent task gets its own bullet in the implementation plan with explicit inputs and pass criteria. The subagent's output is summarized in the relevant commit message ("Subagent verification: …") so the trail is auditable.
## Concrete path/config edits
**Verified prior to writing this spec.** `drill/cli.py` defines `PROJECT_ROOT = Path(__file__).parent.parent`. After the move, `cli.py` lives at `evals/drill/cli.py`, so `PROJECT_ROOT` resolves to `evals/` and `PROJECT_ROOT.parent` resolves to the superpowers repo root. That's the value `SUPERPOWERS_ROOT` should take by default.
**YAML substitution audit.** Only the four `claude*.yaml` backend configs interpolate `${SUPERPOWERS_ROOT}` into `args` (for the `--plugin-dir` flag); `codex.yaml` and `gemini.yaml` only list `SUPERPOWERS_ROOT` in `required_env` (consumed by `engine.py:233` / `setup.py:25`'s `os.environ["SUPERPOWERS_ROOT"]` lookups in pre/post-run hooks). The helper's `os.environ` mutation covers both code paths.
| File | Current | After |
|------|---------|-------|
| `drill/cli.py` | `load_dotenv(PROJECT_ROOT / ".env")` at module import; nothing about `SUPERPOWERS_ROOT` | After `load_dotenv`, call new helper `_set_superpowers_root_default()` that sets `os.environ["SUPERPOWERS_ROOT"]` to `str(PROJECT_ROOT.parent)` if and only if not already set. Order: `load_dotenv` → set default → click group definitions. |
| `drill/engine.py:233`, `drill/setup.py:25` | Direct `os.environ["SUPERPOWERS_ROOT"]` access (KeyError if unset) | Unchanged. The CLI startup hook guarantees the env var is set by the time the engine/setup execute. |
| `backends/claude*.yaml` (5 files) | `${SUPERPOWERS_ROOT}` substituted in `args` for `--plugin-dir` | Unchanged. YAML substitution reads `os.environ` at backend-load time, which is after CLI startup. |
| `backends/codex.yaml`, `backends/gemini.yaml` | `SUPERPOWERS_ROOT` in `required_env` only | Drop from `required_env` (the helper supplies it). `claude*.yaml` keep `required_env` for backward compat (env var works as override). |
| `evals/tests/test_backend.py` | Tests assert `SUPERPOWERS_ROOT` is in `required_env` lists, plus path-resolution tests | Update tests to match the new contract: helper-supplied default, env override still works, `required_env` no longer required for codex/gemini. |
| `evals/README.md` | "export SUPERPOWERS_ROOT=/path/to/superpowers" | Drop the export line; note that the env var auto-defaults to the parent of `evals/`; mention the only required setup is `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY` (or `OPENAI_API_KEY` / Gemini auth). |
| `evals/CLAUDE.md` | Same | Same |
| `evals/.gitignore` | drill's existing patterns (`results/`, `.venv/`, `__pycache__/`, `.env`, `*.pyc`, `*.egg-info/`, `dist/`, `build/`, `.claude/`) | Copied verbatim. Patterns are relative to file location, so they apply correctly under `evals/`. |
| `evals/lefthook.yml` | drill ships `lefthook.yml` defining `pre-commit: uv run ruff check && uv run ty check` | Move to `evals/lefthook.yml`. Either (a) install lefthook at the superpowers root and have it federate to `evals/lefthook.yml`, or (b) document that contributors run `cd evals && lefthook run pre-commit` manually. **Decision in implementation: option (b) for simplicity** — superpowers' top-level workflow doesn't change. |
`.env` placement: keep `evals/.env` (gitignored). Contributors source it from there or set `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY` in their shell environment.
**Top-level superpowers files needing small additions:**
- `superpowers/.gitignore`: add `evals/results/`, `evals/.venv/`, `evals/.env` (belt-and-suspenders; evals/.gitignore already covers these locally).
- `superpowers/CLAUDE.md`: add a one-line pointer "Eval harness lives at `evals/` — see `evals/README.md`" so agents discover it.
- `superpowers/docs/testing.md`: split into "## Plugin tests" (existing tests/ content, with the deleted-test references trimmed) and "## Skill behavior evals" (one-paragraph summary + pointer to `evals/`).
- `superpowers/README.md`: add a single line in the Contributing section pointing at `evals/` for skill-behavior testing.
## Migration ordering
Each step is a separate commit (or small group of commits). Step 2 is the biggest single commit (the verbatim drill copy); subsequent steps are small and atomic.
```
1. Branch off `dev` (f/evals-lift)
2. Copy drill repo into evals/ (single commit, easy to revert)
├─ Record drill SHA at copy time → commit message
├─ Use `rsync -a --exclude=.git --exclude=.venv --exclude=results
│ --exclude=.env --exclude=__pycache__ --exclude='*.egg-info'
│ --exclude=.private-journal /path/to/drill/ evals/`
│ (rsync chosen over `cp -r` for explicit excludes; verify with
│ `find evals -name '.git' -type d` returns nothing)
├─ Subagent gate: per-file SHA-256 checksum matches drill repo for every
│ non-excluded file; excluded paths absent from evals/
└─ Smoke check: `cd evals && uv sync` succeeds (proves install only;
not a behavioral test)
3. Update path defaults
├─ Add _set_superpowers_root_default() helper to drill/cli.py
├─ Wire it after load_dotenv, before click group definition
├─ Update evals/README.md and evals/CLAUDE.md (drop SUPERPOWERS_ROOT install step)
├─ Drop SUPERPOWERS_ROOT from required_env in codex.yaml/gemini.yaml
│ (keep in claude*.yaml as override)
└─ Update evals/tests/test_backend.py to match new contract
4. Validate from new location (TWO checks)
├─ Run drill's own pytest: `cd evals && uv run pytest` — must pass
└─ Run cheap drill scenario: `cd evals && uv run drill run
triggering-test-driven-development -b claude` — must pass.
Real behavioral validation, not just code review.
5. Bash test deletion phase — per-file with subagent gate
For each file in the candidate-deletion list:
a. Subagent compares bash test assertions vs drill scenario verify block
b. Pass criterion: every bash assertion has a matching drill check
c. If pass → delete the bash test file (one commit per file or per
coherent group)
d. If fail → either extend drill scenario (separate commit + verify) or
keep the bash test (no commit)
6. Stale-reference scrub
├─ Subagent greps the superpowers tree (excluding node_modules/, .venv/,
│ evals/) for deleted file paths
├─ Search targets: docs/, docs/superpowers/plans/, RELEASE-NOTES.md,
│ CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, AGENTS.md, README.md, .github/, scripts/,
│ .opencode/INSTALL.md, .codex-plugin/INSTALL.md, lefthook.yml
├─ Update active references (e.g., docs/testing.md, README.md install)
└─ Historical references in docs/superpowers/plans/*.md and
RELEASE-NOTES.md are PRESERVED with a brief annotation
("(test removed; behavior covered by drill scenario X)") rather
than rewritten — these are dated artifacts, not living docs.
7. Top-level docs
├─ docs/testing.md split
├─ CLAUDE.md pointer
└─ README.md Contributing section
8. Re-run smoke checks (regression gate)
├─ `cd evals && uv run pytest`
└─ `cd evals && uv run drill run triggering-test-driven-development -b claude`
9. Final adversarial review
└─ Two parallel subagents, full diff, "5 points to whoever finds the
most legitimate issues" framing. Address findings before push.
10. Push branch + open PR against dev
└─ PR description includes: drill SHA pinned at copy, archival action
item ("after merge: archive obra/drill, add README pointer to
obra/superpowers/evals/"), per-deleted-file coverage receipts.
```
## Verification (post-implementation)
The implementation plan must show:
- All non-excluded drill source files present at `evals/` after step 2 (subagent **per-file SHA-256 checksum diff** vs `obra/drill@<recorded-sha>`).
- Excluded paths (`.git/`, `.venv/`, `results/`, `.env`, `__pycache__/`, `*.egg-info/`, `.private-journal/`) absent from `evals/`.
- The step-2 commit message records the drill source SHA.
- `cd evals && uv sync` succeeds without `SUPERPOWERS_ROOT` set.
- `cd evals && uv run pytest` passes (drill's own pytest suite).
- `cd evals && uv run drill list` returns the same scenario count as the standalone drill repo at the recorded SHA.
- `cd evals && uv run drill run triggering-test-driven-development -b claude` passes (proves path defaults work end-to-end).
- For each deleted bash test: subagent verification table in the commit message showing every assertion mapped to a drill check.
- Grep for deleted file paths returns zero hits across living superpowers docs (post step 6); historical refs in `docs/superpowers/plans/*.md` and `RELEASE-NOTES.md` are annotated, not rewritten.
- `docs/testing.md` has both "Plugin tests" and "Skill behavior evals" sections.
- The drill repo's history is untouched; `obra/drill` is unaffected by this PR.
- PR description names the action item to archive `obra/drill` after merge.
## Open questions
None. All clarifying decisions have been made:
| Question | Decision |
|----------|----------|
| Where does drill live in superpowers? | `evals/` (rename from drill); standalone repo archived as separate step |
| Fate of redundant bash tests? | Delete per-file with subagent verification of coverage; default keep |
| Scenarios layout? | Centralized at `evals/scenarios/` |
| Python toolchain placement? | Self-contained at `evals/` |
| CI integration? | Manual-only this PR; documented future path |
| Migration mechanics? | Plain copy; drill repo's history preserved in archived repo, not in-tree |
| Internal Python package name? | Keep as `drill` (directory is `evals/`) |
| Branching strategy? | Independent off `dev` (not stacked on `f/cross-platform`) |

View File

@@ -1,303 +1,34 @@
# Testing Superpowers Skills
# Testing Superpowers
This document describes how to test Superpowers skills, particularly the integration tests for complex skills like `subagent-driven-development`.
Superpowers has two distinct kinds of tests, each in its own directory:
## Overview
- **`tests/`** — does the plugin's non-LLM code work? Bash + node + python integration tests for brainstorm-server JS, OpenCode plugin loading, codex-plugin sync, and analysis utilities.
- **`evals/`** — do agents behave correctly on real LLM sessions? Python harness driving real tmux sessions of Claude Code / Codex / Gemini CLI, with an LLM actor and verifier judging skill compliance.
Testing skills that involve subagents, workflows, and complex interactions requires running actual Claude Code sessions in headless mode and verifying their behavior through session transcripts.
## Plugin tests
## Test Structure
Live in `tests/`. Currently:
```
tests/
├── claude-code/
│ ├── test-helpers.sh # Shared test utilities
│ ├── test-subagent-driven-development-integration.sh
│ ├── analyze-token-usage.py # Token analysis tool
│ └── run-skill-tests.sh # Test runner (if exists)
```
- `tests/brainstorm-server/` — node test suite for the brainstorm server JS code.
- `tests/opencode/` — bash tests for OpenCode plugin loading, bootstrap caching, and tool registration.
- `tests/codex-plugin-sync/` — bash sync verification.
- `tests/claude-code/test-helpers.sh`, `analyze-token-usage.py` — utilities used by remaining bash tests.
- `tests/claude-code/test-subagent-driven-development.sh` — agent-can-describe-SDD test (no drill counterpart; tests description-recall, not behavior).
- `tests/claude-code/test-subagent-driven-development-integration.sh` — extended SDD integration with token analysis (drill covers the YAGNI subset; bash adds commit-count, Claude Code task-tracking, and token telemetry assertions).
- `tests/claude-code/test-worktree-native-preference.sh` — RED-GREEN-REFACTOR validation for worktree skill (drill covers the PRESSURE phase; bash also covers RED/GREEN baselines).
- `tests/explicit-skill-requests/` — Haiku-specific, multi-turn, and skill-name-prompted tests not covered by drill.
## Running Tests
Run plugin tests via the relevant directory's `run-*.sh` or `npm test`.
### Integration Tests
## Skill behavior evals
Integration tests execute real Claude Code sessions with actual skills:
Live in `evals/`. Drill is the harness; scenarios live at `evals/scenarios/*.yaml`. See `evals/README.md` for setup. Quick start:
```bash
# Run the subagent-driven-development integration test
cd tests/claude-code
./test-subagent-driven-development-integration.sh
cd evals
uv sync --extra dev
export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=sk-...
uv run drill run triggering-test-driven-development -b claude
```
**Note:** Integration tests can take 10-30 minutes as they execute real implementation plans with multiple subagents.
### Requirements
- Must run from the **superpowers plugin directory** (not from temp directories)
- Claude Code must be installed and available as `claude` command
- Local dev marketplace must be enabled: `"superpowers@superpowers-dev": true` in `~/.claude/settings.json`
## Integration Test: subagent-driven-development
### What It Tests
The integration test verifies the `subagent-driven-development` skill correctly:
1. **Plan Loading**: Reads the plan once at the beginning
2. **Full Task Text**: Provides complete task descriptions to subagents (doesn't make them read files)
3. **Self-Review**: Ensures subagents perform self-review before reporting
4. **Review Order**: Runs spec compliance review before code quality review
5. **Review Loops**: Uses review loops when issues are found
6. **Independent Verification**: Spec reviewer reads code independently, doesn't trust implementer reports
### How It Works
1. **Setup**: Creates a temporary Node.js project with a minimal implementation plan
2. **Execution**: Runs Claude Code in headless mode with the skill
3. **Verification**: Parses the session transcript (`.jsonl` file) to verify:
- Skill tool was invoked
- Subagents were dispatched (Task tool)
- TodoWrite was used for tracking
- Implementation files were created
- Tests pass
- Git commits show proper workflow
4. **Token Analysis**: Shows token usage breakdown by subagent
### Test Output
```
========================================
Integration Test: subagent-driven-development
========================================
Test project: /tmp/tmp.xyz123
=== Verification Tests ===
Test 1: Skill tool invoked...
[PASS] subagent-driven-development skill was invoked
Test 2: Subagents dispatched...
[PASS] 7 subagents dispatched
Test 3: Task tracking...
[PASS] TodoWrite used 5 time(s)
Test 6: Implementation verification...
[PASS] src/math.js created
[PASS] add function exists
[PASS] multiply function exists
[PASS] test/math.test.js created
[PASS] Tests pass
Test 7: Git commit history...
[PASS] Multiple commits created (3 total)
Test 8: No extra features added...
[PASS] No extra features added
=========================================
Token Usage Analysis
=========================================
Usage Breakdown:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agent Description Msgs Input Output Cache Cost
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
main Main session (coordinator) 34 27 3,996 1,213,703 $ 4.09
3380c209 implementing Task 1: Create Add Function 1 2 787 24,989 $ 0.09
34b00fde implementing Task 2: Create Multiply Function 1 4 644 25,114 $ 0.09
3801a732 reviewing whether an implementation matches... 1 5 703 25,742 $ 0.09
4c142934 doing a final code review... 1 6 854 25,319 $ 0.09
5f017a42 a code reviewer. Review Task 2... 1 6 504 22,949 $ 0.08
a6b7fbe4 a code reviewer. Review Task 1... 1 6 515 22,534 $ 0.08
f15837c0 reviewing whether an implementation matches... 1 6 416 22,485 $ 0.07
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS:
Total messages: 41
Input tokens: 62
Output tokens: 8,419
Cache creation tokens: 132,742
Cache read tokens: 1,382,835
Total input (incl cache): 1,515,639
Total tokens: 1,524,058
Estimated cost: $4.67
(at $3/$15 per M tokens for input/output)
========================================
Test Summary
========================================
STATUS: PASSED
```
## Token Analysis Tool
### Usage
Analyze token usage from any Claude Code session:
```bash
python3 tests/claude-code/analyze-token-usage.py ~/.claude/projects/<project-dir>/<session-id>.jsonl
```
### Finding Session Files
Session transcripts are stored in `~/.claude/projects/` with the working directory path encoded:
```bash
# Example for /Users/yourname/Documents/GitHub/superpowers/superpowers
SESSION_DIR="$HOME/.claude/projects/-Users-yourname-Documents-GitHub-superpowers-superpowers"
# Find recent sessions
ls -lt "$SESSION_DIR"/*.jsonl | head -5
```
### What It Shows
- **Main session usage**: Token usage by the coordinator (you or main Claude instance)
- **Per-subagent breakdown**: Each Task invocation with:
- Agent ID
- Description (extracted from prompt)
- Message count
- Input/output tokens
- Cache usage
- Estimated cost
- **Totals**: Overall token usage and cost estimate
### Understanding the Output
- **High cache reads**: Good - means prompt caching is working
- **High input tokens on main**: Expected - coordinator has full context
- **Similar costs per subagent**: Expected - each gets similar task complexity
- **Cost per task**: Typical range is $0.05-$0.15 per subagent depending on task
## Troubleshooting
### Skills Not Loading
**Problem**: Skill not found when running headless tests
**Solutions**:
1. Ensure you're running FROM the superpowers directory: `cd /path/to/superpowers && tests/...`
2. Check `~/.claude/settings.json` has `"superpowers@superpowers-dev": true` in `enabledPlugins`
3. Verify skill exists in `skills/` directory
### Permission Errors
**Problem**: Claude blocked from writing files or accessing directories
**Solutions**:
1. Use `--permission-mode bypassPermissions` flag
2. Use `--add-dir /path/to/temp/dir` to grant access to test directories
3. Check file permissions on test directories
### Test Timeouts
**Problem**: Test takes too long and times out
**Solutions**:
1. Increase timeout: `timeout 1800 claude ...` (30 minutes)
2. Check for infinite loops in skill logic
3. Review subagent task complexity
### Session File Not Found
**Problem**: Can't find session transcript after test run
**Solutions**:
1. Check the correct project directory in `~/.claude/projects/`
2. Use `find ~/.claude/projects -name "*.jsonl" -mmin -60` to find recent sessions
3. Verify test actually ran (check for errors in test output)
## Writing New Integration Tests
### Template
```bash
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
source "$SCRIPT_DIR/test-helpers.sh"
# Create test project
TEST_PROJECT=$(create_test_project)
trap "cleanup_test_project $TEST_PROJECT" EXIT
# Set up test files...
cd "$TEST_PROJECT"
# Run Claude with skill
PROMPT="Your test prompt here"
cd "$SCRIPT_DIR/../.." && timeout 1800 claude -p "$PROMPT" \
--allowed-tools=all \
--add-dir "$TEST_PROJECT" \
--permission-mode bypassPermissions \
2>&1 | tee output.txt
# Find and analyze session
WORKING_DIR_ESCAPED=$(echo "$SCRIPT_DIR/../.." | sed 's/\\//-/g' | sed 's/^-//')
SESSION_DIR="$HOME/.claude/projects/$WORKING_DIR_ESCAPED"
SESSION_FILE=$(find "$SESSION_DIR" -name "*.jsonl" -type f -mmin -60 | sort -r | head -1)
# Verify behavior by parsing session transcript
if grep -q '"name":"Skill".*"skill":"your-skill-name"' "$SESSION_FILE"; then
echo "[PASS] Skill was invoked"
fi
# Show token analysis
python3 "$SCRIPT_DIR/analyze-token-usage.py" "$SESSION_FILE"
```
### Best Practices
1. **Always cleanup**: Use trap to cleanup temp directories
2. **Parse transcripts**: Don't grep user-facing output - parse the `.jsonl` session file
3. **Grant permissions**: Use `--permission-mode bypassPermissions` and `--add-dir`
4. **Run from plugin dir**: Skills only load when running from the superpowers directory
5. **Show token usage**: Always include token analysis for cost visibility
6. **Test real behavior**: Verify actual files created, tests passing, commits made
## Session Transcript Format
Session transcripts are JSONL (JSON Lines) files where each line is a JSON object representing a message or tool result.
### Key Fields
```json
{
"type": "assistant",
"message": {
"content": [...],
"usage": {
"input_tokens": 27,
"output_tokens": 3996,
"cache_read_input_tokens": 1213703
}
}
}
```
### Tool Results
```json
{
"type": "user",
"toolUseResult": {
"agentId": "3380c209",
"usage": {
"input_tokens": 2,
"output_tokens": 787,
"cache_read_input_tokens": 24989
},
"prompt": "You are implementing Task 1...",
"content": [{"type": "text", "text": "..."}]
}
}
```
The `agentId` field links to subagent sessions, and the `usage` field contains token usage for that specific subagent invocation.
Drill scenarios are slow (3-30+ minutes each) and run real LLM sessions. They are not part of CI today; the natural follow-up is a tiered model (fast subset on PR, full sweep nightly + on-demand).

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
# Cross-Platform Polyglot Hooks for Claude Code
Claude Code plugins need hooks that work on Windows, macOS, and Linux. This document explains the polyglot wrapper technique that makes this possible.
Claude Code plugins need hooks that work on Windows, macOS, and Linux. This document describes the single generic dispatcher pattern used in `hooks/run-hook.cmd`.
> **Authoritative source:** `hooks/run-hook.cmd` is the canonical implementation. When this document and the code diverge, trust the code.
## The Problem
@@ -10,52 +12,22 @@ Claude Code runs hook commands through the system's default shell:
This creates several challenges:
1. **Script execution**: Windows CMD can't execute `.sh` files directly - it tries to open them in a text editor
1. **Script execution**: Windows CMD can't execute `.sh` files directly
2. **Path format**: Windows uses backslashes (`C:\path`), Unix uses forward slashes (`/path`)
3. **Environment variables**: `$VAR` syntax doesn't work in CMD
4. **No `bash` in PATH**: Even with Git Bash installed, `bash` isn't in the PATH when CMD runs
4. **`.sh` auto-prepend**: Claude Code on Windows automatically prepends `bash` to any command that contains `.sh` in its path — this interferes with the dispatcher if scripts have extensions
## The Solution: Polyglot `.cmd` Wrapper
## The Solution: Extensionless Scripts + Single Generic Dispatcher
A polyglot script is valid syntax in multiple languages simultaneously. Our wrapper is valid in both CMD and bash:
The repo uses one generic `run-hook.cmd` dispatcher for all hooks. Hook scripts are **extensionless** (`session-start`, not `session-start.sh`). This is deliberate: it prevents Claude Code's Windows auto-detection from prepending `bash` to the dispatcher command and breaking it.
```cmd
: << 'CMDBLOCK'
@echo off
"C:\Program Files\Git\bin\bash.exe" -l -c "\"$(cygpath -u \"$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT\")/hooks/session-start.sh\""
exit /b
CMDBLOCK
# Unix shell runs from here
"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/session-start.sh"
```
### How It Works
#### On Windows (CMD.exe)
1. `: << 'CMDBLOCK'` - CMD sees `:` as a label (like `:label`) and ignores `<< 'CMDBLOCK'`
2. `@echo off` - Suppresses command echoing
3. The bash.exe command runs with:
- `-l` (login shell) to get proper PATH with Unix utilities
- `cygpath -u` converts Windows path to Unix format (`C:\foo``/c/foo`)
4. `exit /b` - Exits the batch script, stopping CMD here
5. Everything after `CMDBLOCK` is never reached by CMD
#### On Unix (bash/sh)
1. `: << 'CMDBLOCK'` - `:` is a no-op, `<< 'CMDBLOCK'` starts a heredoc
2. Everything until `CMDBLOCK` is consumed by the heredoc (ignored)
3. `# Unix shell runs from here` - Comment
4. The script runs directly with the Unix path
## File Structure
### File Structure
```
hooks/
├── hooks.json # Points to the .cmd wrapper
├── session-start.cmd # Polyglot wrapper (cross-platform entry point)
└── session-start.sh # Actual hook logic (bash script)
├── hooks.json # Points to run-hook.cmd with extensionless script name
├── run-hook.cmd # Cross-platform dispatcher (the polyglot wrapper)
└── session-start # Actual hook logic — extensionless bash script
```
### hooks.json
@@ -65,11 +37,12 @@ hooks/
"hooks": {
"SessionStart": [
{
"matcher": "startup|resume|clear|compact",
"matcher": "startup|clear|compact",
"hooks": [
{
"type": "command",
"command": "\"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/session-start.cmd\""
"command": "\"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/run-hook.cmd\" session-start",
"async": false
}
]
}
@@ -78,41 +51,63 @@ hooks/
}
```
Note: The path must be quoted because `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}` may contain spaces on Windows (e.g., `C:\Program Files\...`).
The path is quoted because `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}` may contain spaces.
## Requirements
## How `run-hook.cmd` Works at a High Level
### Windows
- **Git for Windows** must be installed (provides `bash.exe` and `cygpath`)
- Default installation path: `C:\Program Files\Git\bin\bash.exe`
- If Git is installed elsewhere, the wrapper needs modification
`run-hook.cmd` is a polyglot script: Windows treats the first block as batch
commands, while Unix shells treat that block as a no-op heredoc and continue
after it.
### Unix (macOS/Linux)
- Standard bash or sh shell
- The `.cmd` file must have execute permission (`chmod +x`)
Do not copy an implementation from this document. Read `hooks/run-hook.cmd`
directly when changing the dispatcher, and run `tests/hooks/test-session-start.sh`
afterward.
### How it works on Windows (CMD.exe)
1. The batch section validates the script name and resolves the hook directory
from the dispatcher's own location.
2. It tries bash in three places:
- `C:\Program Files\Git\bin\bash.exe`
- `C:\Program Files (x86)\Git\bin\bash.exe`
- `bash` on `PATH` (MSYS2, Cygwin, or a non-default Git install)
3. If bash is found, it runs the named extensionless hook script from the hooks
directory.
4. If no bash is found, the dispatcher exits `0` silently — the plugin
continues working, it just skips the hook.
5. `exit /b` stops CMD before it reaches the Unix section.
### How it works on Unix (bash/sh)
1. `: << 'CMDBLOCK'` opens a heredoc on a no-op command.
2. The entire CMD batch block is consumed by the heredoc and ignored.
3. After `CMDBLOCK`, bash resolves the script directory and `exec`s the named
extensionless script directly.
### Key design decisions
| Decision | Why |
|----------|-----|
| Extensionless scripts | Prevents Claude Code's Windows `.sh`-auto-prepend from interfering with the dispatcher command |
| No `-l` (login shell) | Not needed; hook scripts should be self-contained and not depend on login-shell PATH setup |
| No `cygpath` | Bash receives the Windows path directly and handles it correctly; `cygpath` was needed by the old `-c "..."` invocation pattern, not by direct exec |
| Silent exit on no-bash | Avoids breaking the plugin for users who don't have Git for Windows; hook context injection is skipped gracefully |
## Writing Cross-Platform Hook Scripts
Your actual hook logic goes in the `.sh` file. To ensure it works on Windows (via Git Bash):
Your hook logic goes in the extensionless script file. A few portable patterns:
### Do:
### Do
- Use pure bash builtins when possible
- Use `$(command)` instead of backticks
- Quote all variable expansions: `"$VAR"`
- Use `printf` or here-docs for output
### Avoid:
- External commands that may not be in PATH (sed, awk, grep)
- If you must use them, they're available in Git Bash but ensure PATH is set up (use `bash -l`)
### Avoid
- Relying on PATH-dependent tools without fallbacks (the hook runs without `-l`, so login-shell PATH is not set)
- Giving scripts a `.sh` extension — this triggers Claude Code's Windows auto-prepend
### Example: JSON Escaping Without sed/awk
### Example: JSON escaping without external tools
Instead of:
```bash
escaped=$(echo "$content" | sed 's/\\/\\\\/g' | sed 's/"/\\"/g' | awk '{printf "%s\\n", $0}')
```
Use pure bash:
```bash
escape_for_json() {
local input="$1"
@@ -133,80 +128,21 @@ escape_for_json() {
}
```
## Reusable Wrapper Pattern
For plugins with multiple hooks, you can create a generic wrapper that takes the script name as an argument:
### run-hook.cmd
```cmd
: << 'CMDBLOCK'
@echo off
set "SCRIPT_DIR=%~dp0"
set "SCRIPT_NAME=%~1"
"C:\Program Files\Git\bin\bash.exe" -l -c "cd \"$(cygpath -u \"%SCRIPT_DIR%\")\" && \"./%SCRIPT_NAME%\""
exit /b
CMDBLOCK
# Unix shell runs from here
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
SCRIPT_NAME="$1"
shift
"${SCRIPT_DIR}/${SCRIPT_NAME}" "$@"
```
### hooks.json using the reusable wrapper
```json
{
"hooks": {
"SessionStart": [
{
"matcher": "startup",
"hooks": [
{
"type": "command",
"command": "\"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/run-hook.cmd\" session-start.sh"
}
]
}
],
"PreToolUse": [
{
"matcher": "Bash",
"hooks": [
{
"type": "command",
"command": "\"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/run-hook.cmd\" validate-bash.sh"
}
]
}
]
}
}
```
## Troubleshooting
### "bash is not recognized"
CMD can't find bash. The wrapper uses the full path `C:\Program Files\Git\bin\bash.exe`. If Git is installed elsewhere, update the path.
### "cygpath: command not found" or "dirname: command not found"
Bash isn't running as a login shell. Ensure `-l` flag is used.
CMD couldn't find bash in any of the three locations the dispatcher tries. The dispatcher exits silently (0) rather than erroring, so the hook is skipped. Install Git for Windows at the standard path or ensure `bash` is on `PATH`.
### Path has weird `\/` in it
`${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}` expanded to a Windows path ending with backslash, then `/hooks/...` was appended. Use `cygpath` to convert the entire path.
### Hook runs on Unix but does nothing on Windows
### Script opens in text editor instead of running
The hooks.json is pointing directly to the `.sh` file. Point to the `.cmd` wrapper instead.
Check that the script filename is **extensionless** in `hooks.json`. A command like `run-hook.cmd session-start.sh` can trigger Claude Code's `.sh` auto-detection and bypass the intended CMD dispatcher path, or just try to run a non-existent `session-start.sh` script.
### Works in terminal but not as hook
Claude Code may run hooks differently. Test by simulating the hook environment:
```powershell
$env:CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT = "C:\path\to\plugin"
cmd /c "C:\path\to\plugin\hooks\session-start.cmd"
```
### Hook doesn't fire at all
Verify the `matcher` in `hooks.json` matches the event type your harness emits. Claude Code uses `startup|clear|compact`; Codex uses `startup|resume|clear`. Check `hooks-codex.json` for the Codex variant.
## Related Issues
- [anthropics/claude-code#9758](https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/9758) - .sh scripts open in editor on Windows
- [anthropics/claude-code#3417](https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/3417) - Hooks don't work on Windows
- [anthropics/claude-code#6023](https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/6023) - CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR not found
- [anthropics/claude-code#9758](https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/9758) `.sh` scripts open in editor on Windows
- [anthropics/claude-code#3417](https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/3417) Hooks don't work on Windows

1
evals Submodule

Submodule evals added at e2b37138c8

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{
"name": "superpowers",
"description": "Core skills library: TDD, debugging, collaboration patterns, and proven techniques",
"version": "5.0.6",
"version": "5.1.0",
"contextFileName": "GEMINI.md"
}

16
hooks/hooks-codex.json Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
{
"hooks": {
"SessionStart": [
{
"matcher": "startup|resume|clear",
"hooks": [
{
"type": "command",
"command": "\"${PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/run-hook.cmd\" session-start-codex",
"async": false
}
]
}
]
}
}

View File

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
"hooks": {
"sessionStart": [
{
"command": "./hooks/session-start"
"command": "./hooks/run-hook.cmd session-start"
}
]
}

View File

@@ -7,13 +7,6 @@ set -euo pipefail
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
PLUGIN_ROOT="$(cd "${SCRIPT_DIR}/.." && pwd)"
# Check if legacy skills directory exists and build warning
warning_message=""
legacy_skills_dir="${HOME}/.config/superpowers/skills"
if [ -d "$legacy_skills_dir" ]; then
warning_message="\n\n<important-reminder>IN YOUR FIRST REPLY AFTER SEEING THIS MESSAGE YOU MUST TELL THE USER:⚠️ **WARNING:** Superpowers now uses Claude Code's skills system. Custom skills in ~/.config/superpowers/skills will not be read. Move custom skills to ~/.claude/skills instead. To make this message go away, remove ~/.config/superpowers/skills</important-reminder>"
fi
# Read using-superpowers content
using_superpowers_content=$(cat "${PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/using-superpowers/SKILL.md" 2>&1 || echo "Error reading using-superpowers skill")
@@ -31,8 +24,7 @@ escape_for_json() {
}
using_superpowers_escaped=$(escape_for_json "$using_superpowers_content")
warning_escaped=$(escape_for_json "$warning_message")
session_context="<EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>\nYou have superpowers.\n\n**Below is the full content of your 'superpowers:using-superpowers' skill - your introduction to using skills. For all other skills, use the 'Skill' tool:**\n\n${using_superpowers_escaped}\n\n${warning_escaped}\n</EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>"
session_context="<EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>\nYou have superpowers.\n\n**Below is the full content of your 'superpowers:using-superpowers' skill - your introduction to using skills. For all other skills, use the 'Skill' tool:**\n\n${using_superpowers_escaped}\n</EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>"
# Output context injection as JSON.
# Cursor hooks expect additional_context (snake_case).
@@ -45,13 +37,13 @@ session_context="<EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>\nYou have superpowers.\n\n**Below is the
# See: https://github.com/obra/superpowers/issues/571
if [ -n "${CURSOR_PLUGIN_ROOT:-}" ]; then
# Cursor sets CURSOR_PLUGIN_ROOT (may also set CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT)
printf '{\n "additional_context": "%s"\n}\n' "$session_context"
printf '{\n "additional_context": "%s"\n}\n' "$session_context" | cat
elif [ -n "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-}" ] && [ -z "${COPILOT_CLI:-}" ]; then
# Claude Code sets CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT without COPILOT_CLI
printf '{\n "hookSpecificOutput": {\n "hookEventName": "SessionStart",\n "additionalContext": "%s"\n }\n}\n' "$session_context"
printf '{\n "hookSpecificOutput": {\n "hookEventName": "SessionStart",\n "additionalContext": "%s"\n }\n}\n' "$session_context" | cat
else
# Copilot CLI (sets COPILOT_CLI=1) or unknown platform — SDK standard format
printf '{\n "additionalContext": "%s"\n}\n' "$session_context"
printf '{\n "additionalContext": "%s"\n}\n' "$session_context" | cat
fi
exit 0

26
hooks/session-start-codex Executable file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Codex SessionStart hook for superpowers plugin
set -euo pipefail
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
PLUGIN_ROOT="$(cd "${SCRIPT_DIR}/.." && pwd)"
using_superpowers_content=$(cat "${PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/using-superpowers/SKILL.md" 2>&1 || echo "Error reading using-superpowers skill")
escape_for_json() {
local s="$1"
s="${s//\\/\\\\}"
s="${s//\"/\\\"}"
s="${s//$'\n'/\\n}"
s="${s//$'\r'/\\r}"
s="${s//$'\t'/\\t}"
printf '%s' "$s"
}
using_superpowers_escaped=$(escape_for_json "$using_superpowers_content")
session_context="<EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>\nYou have superpowers.\n\n**Below is the full content of your 'superpowers:using-superpowers' skill - your introduction to using skills. For all other skills, follow the Codex skill-loading instructions in that skill:**\n\n${using_superpowers_escaped}\n</EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>"
printf '{\n "hookSpecificOutput": {\n "hookEventName": "SessionStart",\n "additionalContext": "%s"\n }\n}\n' "$session_context" | cat
exit 0

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,23 @@
{
"name": "superpowers",
"version": "5.0.6",
"version": "5.1.0",
"description": "Superpowers skills and runtime bootstrap for coding agents",
"type": "module",
"main": ".opencode/plugins/superpowers.js"
"main": ".opencode/plugins/superpowers.js",
"keywords": [
"pi-package",
"skills",
"tdd",
"debugging",
"collaboration",
"workflow"
],
"pi": {
"extensions": [
"./.pi/extensions/superpowers.ts"
],
"skills": [
"./skills"
]
}
}

220
scripts/bump-version.sh Executable file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
#
# bump-version.sh — bump version numbers across all declared files,
# with drift detection and repo-wide audit for missed files.
#
# Usage:
# bump-version.sh <new-version> Bump all declared files to new version
# bump-version.sh --check Report current versions (detect drift)
# bump-version.sh --audit Check + grep repo for old version strings
#
set -euo pipefail
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
REPO_ROOT="$(cd "$SCRIPT_DIR/.." && pwd)"
CONFIG="$REPO_ROOT/.version-bump.json"
if [[ ! -f "$CONFIG" ]]; then
echo "error: .version-bump.json not found at $CONFIG" >&2
exit 1
fi
# --- helpers ---
# Read a dotted field path from a JSON file.
# Handles both simple ("version") and nested ("plugins.0.version") paths.
read_json_field() {
local file="$1" field="$2"
# Convert dot-path to jq path: "plugins.0.version" -> .plugins[0].version
local jq_path
jq_path=$(echo "$field" | sed -E 's/\.([0-9]+)/[\1]/g' | sed 's/^/./' | sed 's/\.\././g')
jq -r "$jq_path" "$file"
}
# Write a dotted field path in a JSON file, preserving formatting.
write_json_field() {
local file="$1" field="$2" value="$3"
local jq_path
jq_path=$(echo "$field" | sed -E 's/\.([0-9]+)/[\1]/g' | sed 's/^/./' | sed 's/\.\././g')
local tmp="${file}.tmp"
jq "$jq_path = \"$value\"" "$file" > "$tmp" && mv "$tmp" "$file"
}
# Read the list of declared files from config.
# Outputs lines of "path<TAB>field"
declared_files() {
jq -r '.files[] | "\(.path)\t\(.field)"' "$CONFIG"
}
# Read the audit exclude patterns from config.
audit_excludes() {
jq -r '.audit.exclude[]' "$CONFIG" 2>/dev/null
}
# --- commands ---
cmd_check() {
local has_drift=0
local versions=()
echo "Version check:"
echo ""
while IFS=$'\t' read -r path field; do
local fullpath="$REPO_ROOT/$path"
if [[ ! -f "$fullpath" ]]; then
printf " %-45s MISSING\n" "$path ($field)"
has_drift=1
continue
fi
local ver
ver=$(read_json_field "$fullpath" "$field")
printf " %-45s %s\n" "$path ($field)" "$ver"
versions+=("$ver")
done < <(declared_files)
echo ""
# Check if all versions match
local unique
unique=$(printf '%s\n' "${versions[@]}" | sort -u | wc -l | tr -d ' ')
if [[ "$unique" -gt 1 ]]; then
echo "DRIFT DETECTED — versions are not in sync:"
printf '%s\n' "${versions[@]}" | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | while read -r count ver; do
echo " $ver ($count files)"
done
has_drift=1
else
echo "All declared files are in sync at ${versions[0]}"
fi
return $has_drift
}
cmd_audit() {
# First run check
cmd_check || true
echo ""
# Determine the current version (most common across declared files)
local current_version
current_version=$(
while IFS=$'\t' read -r path field; do
local fullpath="$REPO_ROOT/$path"
[[ -f "$fullpath" ]] && read_json_field "$fullpath" "$field"
done < <(declared_files) | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -1 | awk '{print $2}'
)
if [[ -z "$current_version" ]]; then
echo "error: could not determine current version" >&2
return 1
fi
echo "Audit: scanning repo for version string '$current_version'..."
echo ""
# Build grep exclude args
local -a exclude_args=()
while IFS= read -r pattern; do
exclude_args+=("--exclude=$pattern" "--exclude-dir=$pattern")
done < <(audit_excludes)
# Also always exclude binary files and .git
exclude_args+=("--exclude-dir=.git" "--exclude-dir=node_modules" "--binary-files=without-match")
# Get list of declared paths for comparison
local -a declared_paths=()
while IFS=$'\t' read -r path _field; do
declared_paths+=("$path")
done < <(declared_files)
# Grep for the version string
local found_undeclared=0
while IFS= read -r match; do
local match_file
match_file=$(echo "$match" | cut -d: -f1)
# Make path relative to repo root
local rel_path="${match_file#$REPO_ROOT/}"
# Check if this file is in the declared list
local is_declared=0
for dp in "${declared_paths[@]}"; do
if [[ "$rel_path" == "$dp" ]]; then
is_declared=1
break
fi
done
if [[ "$is_declared" -eq 0 ]]; then
if [[ "$found_undeclared" -eq 0 ]]; then
echo "UNDECLARED files containing '$current_version':"
found_undeclared=1
fi
echo " $match"
fi
done < <(grep -rn "${exclude_args[@]}" -F "$current_version" "$REPO_ROOT" 2>/dev/null || true)
if [[ "$found_undeclared" -eq 0 ]]; then
echo "No undeclared files contain the version string. All clear."
else
echo ""
echo "Review the above files — if they should be bumped, add them to .version-bump.json"
echo "If they should be skipped, add them to the audit.exclude list."
fi
}
cmd_bump() {
local new_version="$1"
# Validate semver-ish format
if ! echo "$new_version" | grep -qE '^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+'; then
echo "error: '$new_version' doesn't look like a version (expected X.Y.Z)" >&2
exit 1
fi
echo "Bumping all declared files to $new_version..."
echo ""
while IFS=$'\t' read -r path field; do
local fullpath="$REPO_ROOT/$path"
if [[ ! -f "$fullpath" ]]; then
echo " SKIP (missing): $path"
continue
fi
local old_ver
old_ver=$(read_json_field "$fullpath" "$field")
write_json_field "$fullpath" "$field" "$new_version"
printf " %-45s %s -> %s\n" "$path ($field)" "$old_ver" "$new_version"
done < <(declared_files)
echo ""
echo "Done. Running audit to check for missed files..."
echo ""
cmd_audit
}
# --- main ---
case "${1:-}" in
--check)
cmd_check
;;
--audit)
cmd_audit
;;
--help|-h|"")
echo "Usage: bump-version.sh <new-version> | --check | --audit"
echo ""
echo " <new-version> Bump all declared files to the given version"
echo " --check Show current versions, detect drift"
echo " --audit Check + scan repo for undeclared version references"
exit 0
;;
--*)
echo "error: unknown flag '$1'" >&2
exit 1
;;
*)
cmd_bump "$1"
;;
esac

463
scripts/sync-to-codex-plugin.sh Executable file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,463 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
#
# sync-to-codex-plugin.sh
#
# Sync this superpowers checkout → prime-radiant-inc/openai-codex-plugins.
# Clones the fork fresh into a temp dir, rsyncs tracked upstream plugin content
# (including committed Codex files under .codex-plugin/ and assets/), preserves
# OpenAI-owned marketplace metadata already in the destination plugin, commits,
# pushes a sync branch, and opens a PR.
# Path/user agnostic — auto-detects upstream from script location.
#
# Deterministic: running twice against the same upstream SHA produces PRs with
# identical diffs, so two back-to-back runs can verify the tool itself.
#
# Usage:
# ./scripts/sync-to-codex-plugin.sh # full run
# ./scripts/sync-to-codex-plugin.sh -n # dry run
# ./scripts/sync-to-codex-plugin.sh -y # skip confirm
# ./scripts/sync-to-codex-plugin.sh --local PATH # existing checkout
# ./scripts/sync-to-codex-plugin.sh --base BRANCH # default: main
# ./scripts/sync-to-codex-plugin.sh --bootstrap # create plugin dir if missing
#
# Bootstrap mode: skips the "plugin must exist on base" requirement and creates
# plugins/superpowers/ when absent, then copies the tracked plugin files from
# upstream just like a normal sync.
#
# Requires: bash, rsync, git, gh (authenticated), python3.
set -euo pipefail
# =============================================================================
# Config — edit as upstream or canonical plugin shape evolves
# =============================================================================
FORK="prime-radiant-inc/openai-codex-plugins"
DEFAULT_BASE="main"
DEST_REL="plugins/superpowers"
# Paths in upstream that should NOT land in the embedded plugin.
# All patterns use a leading "/" to anchor them to the source root.
# Unanchored patterns like "scripts/" would match any directory named
# "scripts" at any depth — including legitimate nested dirs like
# skills/brainstorming/scripts/. Anchoring prevents that.
# (.DS_Store is intentionally unanchored — Finder creates them everywhere.)
EXCLUDES=(
# Dotfiles and infra — top-level only
"/.claude/"
"/.claude-plugin/"
"/.codex/"
"/.cursor-plugin/"
"/.git/"
"/.gitattributes"
"/.github/"
"/.gitignore"
"/.opencode/"
"/.pi/"
"/.version-bump.json"
"/.worktrees/"
".DS_Store"
# Root ceremony files
"/AGENTS.md"
"/CHANGELOG.md"
"/CLAUDE.md"
"/GEMINI.md"
"/RELEASE-NOTES.md"
"/gemini-extension.json"
"/package.json"
# Directories not shipped by canonical Codex plugins
"/commands/"
"/docs/"
"/evals/"
"/lib/"
"/scripts/"
"/tests/"
"/tmp/"
)
# =============================================================================
# Ignored-path helpers
# =============================================================================
IGNORED_DIR_EXCLUDES=()
path_has_directory_exclude() {
local path="$1"
local dir
if [[ ${#IGNORED_DIR_EXCLUDES[@]} -eq 0 ]]; then
return 1
fi
for dir in "${IGNORED_DIR_EXCLUDES[@]}"; do
[[ "$path" == "$dir"* ]] && return 0
done
return 1
}
ignored_directory_has_tracked_descendants() {
local path="$1"
[[ -n "$(git -C "$UPSTREAM" ls-files --cached -- "$path/")" ]]
}
append_git_ignored_directory_excludes() {
local path
local lookup_path
while IFS= read -r -d '' path; do
[[ "$path" == */ ]] || continue
lookup_path="${path%/}"
if ! ignored_directory_has_tracked_descendants "$lookup_path"; then
IGNORED_DIR_EXCLUDES+=("$path")
RSYNC_ARGS+=(--exclude="/$path")
fi
done < <(git -C "$UPSTREAM" ls-files --others --ignored --exclude-standard --directory -z)
}
append_git_ignored_file_excludes() {
local path
while IFS= read -r -d '' path; do
path_has_directory_exclude "$path" && continue
RSYNC_ARGS+=(--exclude="/$path")
done < <(git -C "$UPSTREAM" ls-files --others --ignored --exclude-standard -z)
}
# =============================================================================
# Args
# =============================================================================
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
UPSTREAM="$(cd "$SCRIPT_DIR/.." && pwd)"
BASE="$DEFAULT_BASE"
DRY_RUN=0
YES=0
LOCAL_CHECKOUT=""
BOOTSTRAP=0
usage() {
sed -n '/^# Usage:/,/^# Requires:/s/^# \{0,1\}//p' "$0"
exit "${1:-0}"
}
while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]; do
case "$1" in
-n|--dry-run) DRY_RUN=1; shift ;;
-y|--yes) YES=1; shift ;;
--local) LOCAL_CHECKOUT="$2"; shift 2 ;;
--base) BASE="$2"; shift 2 ;;
--bootstrap) BOOTSTRAP=1; shift ;;
-h|--help) usage 0 ;;
*) echo "Unknown arg: $1" >&2; usage 2 ;;
esac
done
# =============================================================================
# Preflight
# =============================================================================
die() { echo "ERROR: $*" >&2; exit 1; }
command -v rsync >/dev/null || die "rsync not found in PATH"
command -v git >/dev/null || die "git not found in PATH"
command -v gh >/dev/null || die "gh not found — install GitHub CLI"
command -v python3 >/dev/null || die "python3 not found in PATH"
gh auth status >/dev/null 2>&1 || die "gh not authenticated — run 'gh auth login'"
[[ -d "$UPSTREAM/.git" ]] || die "upstream '$UPSTREAM' is not a git checkout"
[[ -f "$UPSTREAM/.codex-plugin/plugin.json" ]] || die "committed Codex manifest missing at $UPSTREAM/.codex-plugin/plugin.json"
# Read the upstream version from the committed Codex manifest.
UPSTREAM_VERSION="$(python3 -c 'import json,sys; print(json.load(open(sys.argv[1]))["version"])' "$UPSTREAM/.codex-plugin/plugin.json")"
[[ -n "$UPSTREAM_VERSION" ]] || die "could not read 'version' from committed Codex manifest"
UPSTREAM_BRANCH="$(cd "$UPSTREAM" && git branch --show-current)"
UPSTREAM_SHA="$(cd "$UPSTREAM" && git rev-parse HEAD)"
UPSTREAM_SHORT="$(cd "$UPSTREAM" && git rev-parse --short HEAD)"
confirm() {
[[ $YES -eq 1 ]] && return 0
read -rp "$1 [y/N] " ans
[[ "$ans" == "y" || "$ans" == "Y" ]]
}
if [[ "$UPSTREAM_BRANCH" != "main" ]]; then
echo "WARNING: upstream is on '$UPSTREAM_BRANCH', not 'main'"
confirm "Sync from '$UPSTREAM_BRANCH' anyway?" || exit 1
fi
UPSTREAM_STATUS="$(cd "$UPSTREAM" && git status --porcelain)"
if [[ -n "$UPSTREAM_STATUS" ]]; then
echo "WARNING: upstream has uncommitted changes:"
echo "$UPSTREAM_STATUS" | sed 's/^/ /'
echo "Sync will use working-tree state, not HEAD ($UPSTREAM_SHORT)."
confirm "Continue anyway?" || exit 1
fi
# =============================================================================
# Prepare destination (clone fork fresh, or use --local)
# =============================================================================
CLEANUP_DIR=""
cleanup() {
if [[ -n "$CLEANUP_DIR" ]]; then
rm -rf "$CLEANUP_DIR"
fi
}
trap cleanup EXIT
if [[ -n "$LOCAL_CHECKOUT" ]]; then
DEST_REPO="$(cd "$LOCAL_CHECKOUT" && pwd)"
[[ -d "$DEST_REPO/.git" ]] || die "--local path '$DEST_REPO' is not a git checkout"
else
echo "Cloning $FORK..."
CLEANUP_DIR="$(mktemp -d)"
DEST_REPO="$CLEANUP_DIR/openai-codex-plugins"
gh repo clone "$FORK" "$DEST_REPO" >/dev/null
fi
DEST="$DEST_REPO/$DEST_REL"
PREVIEW_REPO="$DEST_REPO"
PREVIEW_DEST="$DEST"
SYNC_SOURCE=""
overlay_destination_paths() {
local repo="$1"
local path
local source_path
local preview_path
while IFS= read -r -d '' path; do
source_path="$repo/$path"
preview_path="$PREVIEW_REPO/$path"
if [[ -e "$source_path" ]]; then
mkdir -p "$(dirname "$preview_path")"
cp -R "$source_path" "$preview_path"
else
rm -rf "$preview_path"
fi
done
}
copy_local_destination_overlay() {
overlay_destination_paths "$DEST_REPO" < <(
git -C "$DEST_REPO" diff --name-only -z -- "$DEST_REL"
)
overlay_destination_paths "$DEST_REPO" < <(
git -C "$DEST_REPO" diff --cached --name-only -z -- "$DEST_REL"
)
overlay_destination_paths "$DEST_REPO" < <(
git -C "$DEST_REPO" ls-files --others --exclude-standard -z -- "$DEST_REL"
)
overlay_destination_paths "$DEST_REPO" < <(
git -C "$DEST_REPO" ls-files --others --ignored --exclude-standard -z -- "$DEST_REL"
)
}
local_checkout_has_uncommitted_destination_changes() {
[[ -n "$(git -C "$DEST_REPO" status --porcelain=1 --untracked-files=all --ignored=matching -- "$DEST_REL")" ]]
}
prepare_preview_checkout() {
if [[ -n "$LOCAL_CHECKOUT" ]]; then
[[ -n "$CLEANUP_DIR" ]] || CLEANUP_DIR="$(mktemp -d)"
PREVIEW_REPO="$CLEANUP_DIR/preview"
git clone -q --no-local "$DEST_REPO" "$PREVIEW_REPO"
PREVIEW_DEST="$PREVIEW_REPO/$DEST_REL"
fi
git -C "$PREVIEW_REPO" checkout -q "$BASE" 2>/dev/null || die "base branch '$BASE' doesn't exist in $FORK"
if [[ -n "$LOCAL_CHECKOUT" ]]; then
copy_local_destination_overlay
fi
if [[ $BOOTSTRAP -ne 1 ]]; then
[[ -d "$PREVIEW_DEST" ]] || die "base branch '$BASE' has no '$DEST_REL/' — use --bootstrap, or pass --base <branch>"
fi
}
prepare_apply_checkout() {
git -C "$DEST_REPO" checkout -q "$BASE" 2>/dev/null || die "base branch '$BASE' doesn't exist in $FORK"
if [[ $BOOTSTRAP -ne 1 ]]; then
[[ -d "$DEST" ]] || die "base branch '$BASE' has no '$DEST_REL/' — use --bootstrap, or pass --base <branch>"
fi
}
apply_to_preview_checkout() {
if [[ $BOOTSTRAP -eq 1 ]]; then
mkdir -p "$PREVIEW_DEST"
fi
rsync "${RSYNC_ARGS[@]}" "$SYNC_SOURCE/" "$PREVIEW_DEST/"
}
preview_checkout_has_changes() {
[[ -n "$(git -C "$PREVIEW_REPO" status --porcelain "$DEST_REL")" ]]
}
prepare_preview_checkout
TIMESTAMP="$(date -u +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S)"
if [[ $BOOTSTRAP -eq 1 ]]; then
SYNC_BRANCH="bootstrap/superpowers-${UPSTREAM_SHORT}-${TIMESTAMP}"
else
SYNC_BRANCH="sync/superpowers-${UPSTREAM_SHORT}-${TIMESTAMP}"
fi
# =============================================================================
# Build rsync args
# =============================================================================
RSYNC_ARGS=(-av --delete --delete-excluded)
for pat in "${EXCLUDES[@]}"; do RSYNC_ARGS+=(--exclude="$pat"); done
append_git_ignored_directory_excludes
append_git_ignored_file_excludes
copy_preserved_destination_metadata() {
local destination="$1"
local source="$2"
local path
local rel
[[ -d "$destination/skills" ]] || return 0
while IFS= read -r -d '' path; do
rel="${path#"$destination"/}"
mkdir -p "$source/$(dirname "$rel")"
cp -p "$path" "$source/$rel"
done < <(find "$destination/skills" -path '*/agents/openai.yaml' -type f -print0)
}
prepare_sync_source() {
local destination="$1"
[[ -n "$CLEANUP_DIR" ]] || CLEANUP_DIR="$(mktemp -d)"
SYNC_SOURCE="$CLEANUP_DIR/source-overlay"
rm -rf "$SYNC_SOURCE"
mkdir -p "$SYNC_SOURCE"
rsync "${RSYNC_ARGS[@]}" "$UPSTREAM/" "$SYNC_SOURCE/" >/dev/null
copy_preserved_destination_metadata "$destination" "$SYNC_SOURCE"
}
prepare_sync_source "$PREVIEW_DEST"
# =============================================================================
# Dry run preview (always shown)
# =============================================================================
echo ""
echo "Upstream: $UPSTREAM ($UPSTREAM_BRANCH @ $UPSTREAM_SHORT)"
echo "Version: $UPSTREAM_VERSION"
echo "Fork: $FORK"
echo "Base: $BASE"
echo "Branch: $SYNC_BRANCH"
if [[ $BOOTSTRAP -eq 1 ]]; then
echo "Mode: BOOTSTRAP (creating plugins/superpowers/ when absent)"
fi
echo ""
echo "=== Preview (rsync --dry-run) ==="
rsync "${RSYNC_ARGS[@]}" --dry-run --itemize-changes "$SYNC_SOURCE/" "$PREVIEW_DEST/"
echo "=== End preview ==="
echo ""
if [[ $DRY_RUN -eq 1 ]]; then
echo ""
echo "Dry run only. Nothing was changed or pushed."
exit 0
fi
# =============================================================================
# Apply
# =============================================================================
echo ""
confirm "Apply changes, push branch, and open PR?" || { echo "Aborted."; exit 1; }
echo ""
if [[ -n "$LOCAL_CHECKOUT" ]]; then
if local_checkout_has_uncommitted_destination_changes; then
die "local checkout has uncommitted changes under '$DEST_REL' — commit, stash, or discard them before syncing"
fi
apply_to_preview_checkout
if ! preview_checkout_has_changes; then
echo "No changes — embedded plugin was already in sync with upstream $UPSTREAM_SHORT (v$UPSTREAM_VERSION)."
exit 0
fi
fi
prepare_apply_checkout
cd "$DEST_REPO"
git checkout -q -b "$SYNC_BRANCH"
echo "Syncing upstream content..."
if [[ $BOOTSTRAP -eq 1 ]]; then
mkdir -p "$DEST"
fi
rsync "${RSYNC_ARGS[@]}" "$SYNC_SOURCE/" "$DEST/"
# Bail early if nothing actually changed
cd "$DEST_REPO"
if [[ -z "$(git status --porcelain "$DEST_REL")" ]]; then
echo "No changes — embedded plugin was already in sync with upstream $UPSTREAM_SHORT (v$UPSTREAM_VERSION)."
exit 0
fi
# =============================================================================
# Commit, push, open PR
# =============================================================================
git add "$DEST_REL"
if [[ $BOOTSTRAP -eq 1 ]]; then
COMMIT_TITLE="bootstrap superpowers v$UPSTREAM_VERSION from upstream main @ $UPSTREAM_SHORT"
PR_BODY="Initial bootstrap of the superpowers plugin from upstream \`main\` @ \`$UPSTREAM_SHORT\` (v$UPSTREAM_VERSION).
Creates \`plugins/superpowers/\` by copying the tracked plugin files from upstream, including \`.codex-plugin/plugin.json\`, \`assets/\`, and \`hooks/\`.
Run via: \`scripts/sync-to-codex-plugin.sh --bootstrap\`
Upstream commit: https://github.com/obra/superpowers/commit/$UPSTREAM_SHA
This is a one-time bootstrap. Subsequent syncs will be normal (non-bootstrap) runs using the same tracked upstream plugin files."
else
COMMIT_TITLE="sync superpowers v$UPSTREAM_VERSION from upstream main @ $UPSTREAM_SHORT"
PR_BODY="Automated sync from superpowers upstream \`main\` @ \`$UPSTREAM_SHORT\` (v$UPSTREAM_VERSION).
Copies the tracked plugin files from upstream, including the committed Codex manifest, assets, and hooks.
Run via: \`scripts/sync-to-codex-plugin.sh\`
Upstream commit: https://github.com/obra/superpowers/commit/$UPSTREAM_SHA
Running the sync tool again against the same upstream SHA should produce a PR with an identical diff — use that to verify the tool is behaving."
fi
git commit --quiet -m "$COMMIT_TITLE
Automated sync via scripts/sync-to-codex-plugin.sh
Upstream: https://github.com/obra/superpowers/commit/$UPSTREAM_SHA
Branch: $SYNC_BRANCH"
echo "Pushing $SYNC_BRANCH to $FORK..."
git push -u origin "$SYNC_BRANCH" --quiet
echo "Opening PR..."
PR_URL="$(gh pr create \
--repo "$FORK" \
--base "$BASE" \
--head "$SYNC_BRANCH" \
--title "$COMMIT_TITLE" \
--body "$PR_BODY")"
PR_NUM="${PR_URL##*/}"
DIFF_URL="https://github.com/$FORK/pull/$PR_NUM/files"
echo ""
echo "PR opened: $PR_URL"
echo "Diff view: $DIFF_URL"

View File

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
* - Scrollable main content area
* - CSS helpers for common UI patterns
*
* Content is injected via placeholder comment in #claude-content.
* Content is injected via placeholder comment in #frame-content.
*/
* { box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0; padding: 0; }
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@
.header .status::before { content: ''; width: 6px; height: 6px; background: var(--success); border-radius: 50%; }
.main { flex: 1; overflow-y: auto; }
#claude-content { padding: 2rem; min-height: 100%; }
#frame-content { padding: 2rem; min-height: 100%; }
.indicator-bar {
background: var(--bg-secondary);
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@
</div>
<div class="main">
<div id="claude-content">
<div id="frame-content">
<!-- CONTENT -->
</div>
</div>

View File

@@ -107,10 +107,23 @@ if [[ -z "$OWNER_PID" || "$OWNER_PID" == "1" ]]; then
OWNER_PID="$PPID"
fi
# Windows/MSYS2: Node.js cannot see POSIX PIDs from the MSYS2 namespace.
# Passing a PID node cannot verify causes server to log owner-pid-invalid
# and self-terminate at the 60-second lifecycle check. Clear it so the
# watchdog is disabled and the idle timeout becomes the only shutdown trigger.
case "${OSTYPE:-}" in
msys*|cygwin*|mingw*) OWNER_PID="" ;;
esac
if [[ -n "${MSYSTEM:-}" ]]; then
OWNER_PID=""
fi
# Foreground mode for environments that reap detached/background processes.
if [[ "$FOREGROUND" == "true" ]]; then
echo "$$" > "$PID_FILE"
env BRAINSTORM_DIR="$SESSION_DIR" BRAINSTORM_HOST="$BIND_HOST" BRAINSTORM_URL_HOST="$URL_HOST" BRAINSTORM_OWNER_PID="$OWNER_PID" node server.cjs
env BRAINSTORM_DIR="$SESSION_DIR" BRAINSTORM_HOST="$BIND_HOST" BRAINSTORM_URL_HOST="$URL_HOST" BRAINSTORM_OWNER_PID="$OWNER_PID" node server.cjs &
SERVER_PID=$!
echo "$SERVER_PID" > "$PID_FILE"
wait "$SERVER_PID"
exit $?
fi

View File

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Use this template when dispatching a spec document reviewer subagent.
**Dispatch after:** Spec document is written to docs/superpowers/specs/
```
Task tool (general-purpose):
Subagent (general-purpose):
description: "Review spec document"
prompt: |
You are a spec document reviewer. Verify this spec is complete and ready for planning.

View File

@@ -49,20 +49,13 @@ Save `screen_dir` and `state_dir` from the response. Tell user to open the URL.
**Launching the server by platform:**
**Claude Code (macOS / Linux):**
**Claude Code:**
```bash
# Default mode works — the script backgrounds the server itself
# Default mode works — the script backgrounds the server itself.
scripts/start-server.sh --project-dir /path/to/project
```
**Claude Code (Windows):**
```bash
# Windows auto-detects and uses foreground mode, which blocks the tool call.
# Use run_in_background: true on the Bash tool call so the server survives
# across conversation turns.
scripts/start-server.sh --project-dir /path/to/project
```
When calling this via the Bash tool, set `run_in_background: true`. Then read `$STATE_DIR/server-info` on the next turn to get the URL and port.
On Windows, the script auto-detects and switches to foreground mode (which blocks the tool call). Use `run_in_background: true` on the Bash tool call so the server survives across conversation turns, then read `$STATE_DIR/server-info` on the next turn to get the URL and port.
**Codex:**
```bash
@@ -78,6 +71,14 @@ scripts/start-server.sh --project-dir /path/to/project
scripts/start-server.sh --project-dir /path/to/project --foreground
```
**Copilot CLI:**
```bash
# Use --foreground and start the server via the bash tool with mode: "async"
# so the process survives across turns. Capture the returned shellId for
# read_bash / stop_bash if you need to interact with it later.
scripts/start-server.sh --project-dir /path/to/project --foreground
```
**Other environments:** The server must keep running in the background across conversation turns. If your environment reaps detached processes, use `--foreground` and launch the command with your platform's background execution mechanism.
If the URL is unreachable from your browser (common in remote/containerized setups), bind a non-loopback host:
@@ -97,7 +98,7 @@ Use `--url-host` to control what hostname is printed in the returned URL JSON.
- Before each write, check that `$STATE_DIR/server-info` exists. If it doesn't (or `$STATE_DIR/server-stopped` exists), the server has shut down — restart it with `start-server.sh` before continuing. The server auto-exits after 30 minutes of inactivity.
- Use semantic filenames: `platform.html`, `visual-style.html`, `layout.html`
- **Never reuse filenames** — each screen gets a fresh file
- Use Write tool — **never use cat/heredoc** (dumps noise into terminal)
- Use your file-creation tool — **never use cat/heredoc** (dumps noise into terminal)
- Server automatically serves the newest file
2. **Tell user what to expect and end your turn:**

View File

@@ -65,14 +65,17 @@ Each agent gets:
### 3. Dispatch in Parallel
```typescript
// In Claude Code / AI environment
Task("Fix agent-tool-abort.test.ts failures")
Task("Fix batch-completion-behavior.test.ts failures")
Task("Fix tool-approval-race-conditions.test.ts failures")
// All three run concurrently
Issue all three subagent dispatches in the same response — they run in parallel:
```text
Subagent (general-purpose): "Fix agent-tool-abort.test.ts failures"
Subagent (general-purpose): "Fix batch-completion-behavior.test.ts failures"
Subagent (general-purpose): "Fix tool-approval-race-conditions.test.ts failures"
# All three run concurrently.
```
Multiple dispatch calls in one response = parallel execution. One per response = sequential.
### 4. Review and Integrate
When agents return:

View File

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Load plan, review critically, execute all tasks, report when complete.
**Announce at start:** "I'm using the executing-plans skill to implement this plan."
**Note:** Tell your human partner that Superpowers works much better with access to subagents. The quality of its work will be significantly higher if run on a platform with subagent support (such as Claude Code or Codex). If subagents are available, use superpowers:subagent-driven-development instead of this skill.
**Note:** Tell your human partner that Superpowers works much better with access to subagents. The quality of its work will be significantly higher if run on a platform with subagent support (Claude Code, Codex CLI, Codex App, Copilot CLI, and Gemini CLI all qualify; see the per-platform tool refs in `../using-superpowers/references/`). If subagents are available, use superpowers:subagent-driven-development instead of this skill.
## The Process
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Load plan, review critically, execute all tasks, report when complete.
1. Read plan file
2. Review critically - identify any questions or concerns about the plan
3. If concerns: Raise them with your human partner before starting
4. If no concerns: Create TodoWrite and proceed
4. If no concerns: Create todos for the plan items and proceed
### Step 2: Execute Tasks

View File

@@ -123,16 +123,6 @@ git branch -d <feature-branch>
```bash
# Push branch
git push -u origin <feature-branch>
# Create PR
gh pr create --title "<title>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
<2-3 bullets of what changed>
## Test Plan
- [ ] <verification steps>
EOF
)"
```
**Do NOT clean up worktree** — user needs it alive to iterate on PR feedback.
@@ -180,7 +170,7 @@ WORKTREE_PATH=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
**If `GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON`:** Normal repo, no worktree to clean up. Done.
**If worktree path is under `.worktrees/`, `worktrees/`, or `~/.config/superpowers/worktrees/`:** Superpowers created this worktree — we own cleanup.
**If worktree path is under `.worktrees/` or `worktrees/`:** Superpowers created this worktree — we own cleanup.
```bash
MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel)
@@ -224,7 +214,7 @@ git worktree prune # Self-healing: clean up any stale registrations
**Cleaning up harness-owned worktrees**
- **Problem:** Removing a worktree the harness created causes phantom state
- **Fix:** Only clean up worktrees under `.worktrees/`, `worktrees/`, or `~/.config/superpowers/worktrees/`
- **Fix:** Only clean up worktrees under `.worktrees/` or `worktrees/`
**No confirmation for discard**
- **Problem:** Accidentally delete work
@@ -249,12 +239,3 @@ git worktree prune # Self-healing: clean up any stale registrations
- Clean up worktree for Options 1 & 4 only
- `cd` to main repo root before worktree removal
- Run `git worktree prune` after removal
## Integration
**Called by:**
- **subagent-driven-development** (Step 7) - After all tasks complete
- **executing-plans** (Step 5) - After all batches complete
**Pairs with:**
- **using-git-worktrees** - Cleans up worktree created by that skill

View File

@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ WHEN receiving code review feedback:
## Forbidden Responses
**NEVER:**
- "You're absolutely right!" (explicit CLAUDE.md violation)
- "You're absolutely right!" (explicit instruction-file violation)
- "Great point!" / "Excellent feedback!" (performative)
- "Let me implement that now" (before verification)
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ Push back when:
- Reference working tests/code
- Involve your human partner if architectural
**Signal if uncomfortable pushing back out loud:** "Strange things are afoot at the Circle K"
**If you're uncomfortable pushing back out loud:** Name that tension, then tell your partner about the issue you've seen. They'll appreciate your honesty.
## Acknowledging Correct Feedback

View File

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ description: Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before m
# Requesting Code Review
Dispatch superpowers:code-reviewer subagent to catch issues before they cascade. The reviewer gets precisely crafted context for evaluation — never your session's history. This keeps the reviewer focused on the work product, not your thought process, and preserves your own context for continued work.
Dispatch a code reviewer subagent to catch issues before they cascade. The reviewer gets precisely crafted context for evaluation — never your session's history. This keeps the reviewer focused on the work product, not your thought process, and preserves your own context for continued work.
**Core principle:** Review early, review often.
@@ -29,16 +29,15 @@ BASE_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD~1) # or origin/main
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
```
**2. Dispatch code-reviewer subagent:**
**2. Dispatch code reviewer subagent:**
Use Task tool with superpowers:code-reviewer type, fill template at `code-reviewer.md`
Dispatch a `general-purpose` subagent, filling the template at [code-reviewer.md](code-reviewer.md)
**Placeholders:**
- `{WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED}` - What you just built
- `{DESCRIPTION}` - Brief summary of what you built
- `{PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS}` - What it should do
- `{BASE_SHA}` - Starting commit
- `{HEAD_SHA}` - Ending commit
- `{DESCRIPTION}` - Brief summary
**3. Act on feedback:**
- Fix Critical issues immediately
@@ -56,12 +55,11 @@ You: Let me request code review before proceeding.
BASE_SHA=$(git log --oneline | grep "Task 1" | head -1 | awk '{print $1}')
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
[Dispatch superpowers:code-reviewer subagent]
WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED: Verification and repair functions for conversation index
[Dispatch code reviewer subagent]
DESCRIPTION: Added verifyIndex() and repairIndex() with 4 issue types
PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: Task 2 from docs/superpowers/plans/deployment-plan.md
BASE_SHA: a7981ec
HEAD_SHA: 3df7661
DESCRIPTION: Added verifyIndex() and repairIndex() with 4 issue types
[Subagent returns]:
Strengths: Clean architecture, real tests
@@ -82,7 +80,7 @@ You: [Fix progress indicators]
- Fix before moving to next task
**Executing Plans:**
- Review after each batch (3 tasks)
- Review after each task or at natural checkpoints
- Get feedback, apply, continue
**Ad-Hoc Development:**
@@ -102,4 +100,4 @@ You: [Fix progress indicators]
- Show code/tests that prove it works
- Request clarification
See template at: requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md
See template at: [code-reviewer.md](code-reviewer.md)

View File

@@ -1,111 +1,137 @@
# Code Review Agent
# Code Reviewer Prompt Template
You are reviewing code changes for production readiness.
Use this template when dispatching a code reviewer subagent.
**Your task:**
1. Review {WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED}
2. Compare against {PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS}
3. Check code quality, architecture, testing
4. Categorize issues by severity
5. Assess production readiness
**Purpose:** Review completed work against requirements and code quality standards before it cascades into more work.
## What Was Implemented
```
Subagent (general-purpose):
description: "Review code changes"
prompt: |
You are a Senior Code Reviewer with expertise in software architecture,
design patterns, and best practices. Your job is to review completed work
against its plan or requirements and identify issues before they cascade.
{DESCRIPTION}
## What Was Implemented
## Requirements/Plan
[DESCRIPTION]
{PLAN_REFERENCE}
## Requirements / Plan
## Git Range to Review
[PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS]
**Base:** {BASE_SHA}
**Head:** {HEAD_SHA}
## Git Range to Review
```bash
git diff --stat {BASE_SHA}..{HEAD_SHA}
git diff {BASE_SHA}..{HEAD_SHA}
**Base:** [BASE_SHA]
**Head:** [HEAD_SHA]
```bash
git diff --stat [BASE_SHA]..[HEAD_SHA]
git diff [BASE_SHA]..[HEAD_SHA]
```
## Read-Only Review
Your review is read-only on this checkout. Do not mutate the working tree, the index, HEAD, or branch state in any way. Use tools like `git show`, `git diff`, and `git log` to inspect history. If you need a working copy of a different revision, check it out into a separate temporary directory (e.g. `git worktree add /tmp/review-[SHA] [SHA]`) — never move HEAD on this checkout.
## What to Check
**Plan alignment:**
- Does the implementation match the plan / requirements?
- Are deviations justified improvements, or problematic departures?
- Is all planned functionality present?
**Code quality:**
- Clean separation of concerns?
- Proper error handling?
- Type safety where applicable?
- DRY without premature abstraction?
- Edge cases handled?
**Architecture:**
- Sound design decisions?
- Reasonable scalability and performance?
- Security concerns?
- Integrates cleanly with surrounding code?
**Testing:**
- Tests verify real behavior, not mocks?
- Edge cases covered?
- Integration tests where they matter?
- All tests passing?
**Production readiness:**
- Migration strategy if schema changed?
- Backward compatibility considered?
- Documentation complete?
- No obvious bugs?
## Calibration
Categorize issues by actual severity. Not everything is Critical.
Acknowledge what was done well before listing issues — accurate praise
helps the implementer trust the rest of the feedback.
If you find significant deviations from the plan, flag them specifically
so the implementer can confirm whether the deviation was intentional.
If you find issues with the plan itself rather than the implementation,
say so.
## Output Format
### Strengths
[What's well done? Be specific.]
### Issues
#### Critical (Must Fix)
[Bugs, security issues, data loss risks, broken functionality]
#### Important (Should Fix)
[Architecture problems, missing features, poor error handling, test gaps]
#### Minor (Nice to Have)
[Code style, optimization opportunities, documentation polish]
For each issue:
- File:line reference
- What's wrong
- Why it matters
- How to fix (if not obvious)
### Recommendations
[Improvements for code quality, architecture, or process]
### Assessment
**Ready to merge?** [Yes | No | With fixes]
**Reasoning:** [1-2 sentence technical assessment]
## Critical Rules
**DO:**
- Categorize by actual severity
- Be specific (file:line, not vague)
- Explain WHY each issue matters
- Acknowledge strengths
- Give a clear verdict
**DON'T:**
- Say "looks good" without checking
- Mark nitpicks as Critical
- Give feedback on code you didn't actually read
- Be vague ("improve error handling")
- Avoid giving a clear verdict
```
## Review Checklist
**Placeholders:**
- `[DESCRIPTION]` — brief summary of what was built
- `[PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS]` — what it should do (plan file path, task text, or requirements)
- `[BASE_SHA]` — starting commit
- `[HEAD_SHA]` — ending commit
**Code Quality:**
- Clean separation of concerns?
- Proper error handling?
- Type safety (if applicable)?
- DRY principle followed?
- Edge cases handled?
**Architecture:**
- Sound design decisions?
- Scalability considerations?
- Performance implications?
- Security concerns?
**Testing:**
- Tests actually test logic (not mocks)?
- Edge cases covered?
- Integration tests where needed?
- All tests passing?
**Requirements:**
- All plan requirements met?
- Implementation matches spec?
- No scope creep?
- Breaking changes documented?
**Production Readiness:**
- Migration strategy (if schema changes)?
- Backward compatibility considered?
- Documentation complete?
- No obvious bugs?
## Output Format
### Strengths
[What's well done? Be specific.]
### Issues
#### Critical (Must Fix)
[Bugs, security issues, data loss risks, broken functionality]
#### Important (Should Fix)
[Architecture problems, missing features, poor error handling, test gaps]
#### Minor (Nice to Have)
[Code style, optimization opportunities, documentation improvements]
**For each issue:**
- File:line reference
- What's wrong
- Why it matters
- How to fix (if not obvious)
### Recommendations
[Improvements for code quality, architecture, or process]
### Assessment
**Ready to merge?** [Yes/No/With fixes]
**Reasoning:** [Technical assessment in 1-2 sentences]
## Critical Rules
**DO:**
- Categorize by actual severity (not everything is Critical)
- Be specific (file:line, not vague)
- Explain WHY issues matter
- Acknowledge strengths
- Give clear verdict
**DON'T:**
- Say "looks good" without checking
- Mark nitpicks as Critical
- Give feedback on code you didn't review
- Be vague ("improve error handling")
- Avoid giving a clear verdict
**Reviewer returns:** Strengths, Issues (Critical / Important / Minor), Recommendations, Assessment
## Example Output

View File

@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ Execute plan by dispatching fresh subagent per task, with two-stage review after
**Core principle:** Fresh subagent per task + two-stage review (spec then quality) = high quality, fast iteration
**Continuous execution:** Do not pause to check in with your human partner between tasks. Execute all tasks from the plan without stopping. The only reasons to stop are: BLOCKED status you cannot resolve, ambiguity that genuinely prevents progress, or all tasks complete. "Should I continue?" prompts and progress summaries waste their time — they asked you to execute the plan, so execute it.
## When to Use
```dot
@@ -55,15 +57,15 @@ digraph process {
"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" [shape=box];
"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?" [shape=diamond];
"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues" [shape=box];
"Mark task complete in TodoWrite" [shape=box];
"Mark task complete in todo list" [shape=box];
}
"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite" [shape=box];
"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create todos" [shape=box];
"More tasks remain?" [shape=diamond];
"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation" [shape=box];
"Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch" [shape=box style=filled fillcolor=lightgreen];
"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite" -> "Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)";
"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create todos" -> "Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)";
"Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)" -> "Implementer subagent asks questions?";
"Implementer subagent asks questions?" -> "Answer questions, provide context" [label="yes"];
"Answer questions, provide context" -> "Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)";
@@ -76,8 +78,8 @@ digraph process {
"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" -> "Code quality reviewer subagent approves?";
"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?" -> "Implementer subagent fixes quality issues" [label="no"];
"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues" -> "Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" [label="re-review"];
"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?" -> "Mark task complete in TodoWrite" [label="yes"];
"Mark task complete in TodoWrite" -> "More tasks remain?";
"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?" -> "Mark task complete in todo list" [label="yes"];
"Mark task complete in todo list" -> "More tasks remain?";
"More tasks remain?" -> "Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)" [label="yes"];
"More tasks remain?" -> "Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation" [label="no"];
"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation" -> "Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch";
@@ -119,9 +121,9 @@ Implementer subagents report one of four statuses. Handle each appropriately:
## Prompt Templates
- `./implementer-prompt.md` - Dispatch implementer subagent
- `./spec-reviewer-prompt.md` - Dispatch spec compliance reviewer subagent
- `./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md` - Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent
- [implementer-prompt.md](implementer-prompt.md) - Dispatch implementer subagent
- [spec-reviewer-prompt.md](spec-reviewer-prompt.md) - Dispatch spec compliance reviewer subagent
- [code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md](code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md) - Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent
## Example Workflow
@@ -130,7 +132,7 @@ You: I'm using Subagent-Driven Development to execute this plan.
[Read plan file once: docs/superpowers/plans/feature-plan.md]
[Extract all 5 tasks with full text and context]
[Create TodoWrite with all tasks]
[Create todos for all tasks]
Task 1: Hook installation script

View File

@@ -7,14 +7,13 @@ Use this template when dispatching a code quality reviewer subagent.
**Only dispatch after spec compliance review passes.**
```
Task tool (superpowers:code-reviewer):
Use template at requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md
Subagent (general-purpose):
Use template at ../requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md
WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED: [from implementer's report]
DESCRIPTION: [task summary, from implementer's report]
PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: Task N from [plan-file]
BASE_SHA: [commit before task]
HEAD_SHA: [current commit]
DESCRIPTION: [task summary]
```
**In addition to standard code quality concerns, the reviewer should check:**

View File

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Use this template when dispatching an implementer subagent.
```
Task tool (general-purpose):
Subagent (general-purpose):
description: "Implement Task N: [task name]"
prompt: |
You are implementing Task N: [task name]

View File

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Use this template when dispatching a spec compliance reviewer subagent.
**Purpose:** Verify implementer built what was requested (nothing more, nothing less)
```
Task tool (general-purpose):
Subagent (general-purpose):
description: "Review spec compliance for Task N"
prompt: |
You are reviewing whether an implementation matches its specification.
@@ -18,6 +18,22 @@ Task tool (general-purpose):
[From implementer's report]
## Git Range to Review
**Base:** [BASE_SHA — commit before this task]
**Head:** [HEAD_SHA — current commit]
```bash
git diff --stat [BASE_SHA]..[HEAD_SHA]
git diff [BASE_SHA]..[HEAD_SHA]
```
Only read files in this diff. Do not crawl the broader codebase.
## Read-Only Review
Your review is read-only on this checkout. Do not mutate the working tree, the index, HEAD, or branch state in any way. Use tools like `git show`, `git diff`, and `git log` to inspect history. If you need a working copy of a different revision, check it out into a separate temporary directory (e.g. `git worktree add /tmp/review-[SHA] [SHA]`) — never move HEAD on this checkout.
## CRITICAL: Do Not Trust the Report
The implementer finished suspiciously quickly. Their report may be incomplete,

View File

@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ If you catch yourself thinking:
- "Is that not happening?" - You assumed without verifying
- "Will it show us...?" - You should have added evidence gathering
- "Stop guessing" - You're proposing fixes without understanding
- "Ultrathink this" - Question fundamentals, not just symptoms
- "Ultra-think this" - Question fundamentals, not just symptoms
- "We're stuck?" (frustrated) - Your approach isn't working
**When you see these:** STOP. Return to Phase 1.

View File

@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ Never fix bugs without a test.
## Testing Anti-Patterns
When adding mocks or test utilities, read @testing-anti-patterns.md to avoid common pitfalls:
When adding mocks or test utilities, read [testing-anti-patterns.md](testing-anti-patterns.md) to avoid common pitfalls:
- Testing mock behavior instead of real behavior
- Adding test-only methods to production classes
- Mocking without understanding dependencies

View File

@@ -30,29 +30,31 @@ BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current)
git rev-parse --show-superproject-working-tree 2>/dev/null
```
**If `GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON` (and not a submodule):** You are already in a linked worktree. Skip to Step 3 (Project Setup). Do NOT create another worktree.
**If `GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON` (and not a submodule):** You are already in a linked worktree. Skip to Step 2 (Project Setup). Do NOT create another worktree.
Report with branch state:
- On a branch: "Already in isolated workspace at `<path>` on branch `<name>`."
- Detached HEAD: "Already in isolated workspace at `<path>` (detached HEAD, externally managed). Branch creation needed at finish time."
**If `GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON` (or in a submodule):** You are in a normal repo checkout. Proceed to Step 1 to create an isolated workspace.
**If `GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON` (or in a submodule):** You are in a normal repo checkout.
**Do not stop to ask the user whether they want a worktree.** Invoking this skill IS the request for isolation — your authorization to create one comes from that invocation, not from a separate "yes" reply. If the user has already declared in their instructions that they prefer to work in place, honor that and skip to Step 3. Otherwise, create the worktree.
Has the user already indicated their worktree preference in your instructions? If not, ask for consent before creating a worktree:
> "Would you like me to set up an isolated worktree? It protects your current branch from changes."
Honor any existing declared preference without asking. If the user declines consent, work in place and skip to Step 2.
## Step 1: Create Isolated Workspace
**You have two mechanisms. Try them in this order.**
### 1a. Native Worktree Tools (preferred — STOP HERE if available)
### 1a. Native Worktree Tools (preferred)
Do you have a tool with a name like `EnterWorktree`, `WorktreeCreate`, a `/worktree` command, or a `--worktree` flag? **If YES: use it now and skip to Step 3.** Skill invocation is your authorization — you do not need a separate user reply.
The user has asked for an isolated workspace (Step 0 consent). Do you already have a way to create a worktree? It might be a tool with a name like `EnterWorktree`, `WorktreeCreate`, a `/worktree` command, or a `--worktree` flag. If you do, use it and skip to Step 2.
Native tools handle directory placement, branch creation, and cleanup automatically. Using `git worktree add` when you have a native tool creates phantom state your harness can't see or manage — cleanup becomes impossible.
Native tools handle directory placement, branch creation, and cleanup automatically. Using `git worktree add` when you have a native tool creates phantom state your harness can't see or manage.
**Even if `.worktrees/` already exists, even under time pressure, even if `git worktree add` feels faster — use your native tool.** No exceptions.
Only proceed to Step 1b if you have confirmed you have NO native worktree tool available.
Only proceed to Step 1b if you have no native worktree tool available.
### 1b. Git Worktree Fallback
@@ -71,14 +73,7 @@ Follow this priority order. Explicit user preference always beats observed files
```
If found, use it. If both exist, `.worktrees` wins.
3. **Check for an existing global directory:**
```bash
project=$(basename "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)")
ls -d ~/.config/superpowers/worktrees/$project 2>/dev/null
```
If found, use it (backward compatibility with legacy global path).
4. **If there is no other guidance available**, default to `.worktrees/` at the project root.
3. **If there is no other guidance available**, default to `.worktrees/` at the project root.
#### Safety Verification (project-local directories only)
@@ -92,16 +87,11 @@ git check-ignore -q .worktrees 2>/dev/null || git check-ignore -q worktrees 2>/d
**Why critical:** Prevents accidentally committing worktree contents to repository.
Global directories (`~/.config/superpowers/worktrees/`) need no verification.
#### Create the Worktree
```bash
project=$(basename "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)")
# Determine path based on chosen location
# For project-local: path="$LOCATION/$BRANCH_NAME"
# For global: path="~/.config/superpowers/worktrees/$project/$BRANCH_NAME"
path="$LOCATION/$BRANCH_NAME"
git worktree add "$path" -b "$BRANCH_NAME"
cd "$path"
@@ -109,7 +99,7 @@ cd "$path"
**Sandbox fallback:** If `git worktree add` fails with a permission error (sandbox denial), tell the user the sandbox blocked worktree creation and you're working in the current directory instead. Then run setup and baseline tests in place.
## Step 3: Project Setup
## Step 2: Project Setup
Auto-detect and run appropriate setup:
@@ -128,7 +118,7 @@ if [ -f pyproject.toml ]; then poetry install; fi
if [ -f go.mod ]; then go mod download; fi
```
## Step 4: Verify Clean Baseline
## Step 3: Verify Clean Baseline
Run tests to ensure workspace starts clean:
@@ -161,7 +151,6 @@ Ready to implement <feature-name>
| `worktrees/` exists | Use it (verify ignored) |
| Both exist | Use `.worktrees/` |
| Neither exists | Check instruction file, then default `.worktrees/` |
| Global path exists | Use it (backward compat) |
| Directory not ignored | Add to .gitignore + commit |
| Permission error on create | Sandbox fallback, work in place |
| Tests fail during baseline | Report failures + ask |
@@ -187,7 +176,7 @@ Ready to implement <feature-name>
### Assuming directory location
- **Problem:** Creates inconsistency, violates project conventions
- **Fix:** Follow priority: existing > global legacy > instruction file > default
- **Fix:** Follow priority: explicit instructions > existing project-local directory > default
### Proceeding with failing tests
@@ -197,8 +186,6 @@ Ready to implement <feature-name>
## Red Flags
**Never:**
- Stop to ask the user for consent when the skill has already been invoked. Invoking the skill IS the request — treat it as your authorization to proceed.
- Fall back to a plain feature branch because a native worktree tool feels "restricted to explicit user requests." Skill invocation is the explicit request the tool requires.
- Create a worktree when Step 0 detects existing isolation
- Use `git worktree add` when you have a native worktree tool (e.g., `EnterWorktree`). This is the #1 mistake — if you have it, use it.
- Skip Step 1a by jumping straight to Step 1b's git commands
@@ -207,20 +194,9 @@ Ready to implement <feature-name>
- Proceed with failing tests without asking
**Always:**
- Treat skill invocation as implicit authorization to create a worktree
- Run Step 0 detection first
- Prefer native tools over git fallback
- Follow directory priority: existing > global legacy > instruction file > default
- Follow directory priority: explicit instructions > existing project-local directory > default
- Verify directory is ignored for project-local
- Auto-detect and run project setup
- Verify clean test baseline
## Integration
**Called by:**
- **subagent-driven-development** - Ensures isolated workspace (creates one or verifies existing)
- **executing-plans** - Ensures isolated workspace (creates one or verifies existing)
- Any skill needing isolated workspace
**Pairs with:**
- **finishing-a-development-branch** - REQUIRED for cleanup after work complete

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
---
name: using-superpowers
description: Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions
description: Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring skill invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions
---
<SUBAGENT-STOP>
@@ -27,9 +27,13 @@ If CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, or AGENTS.md says "don't use TDD" and a skill says "alw
## How to Access Skills
**In Claude Code:** Use the `Skill` tool. When you invoke a skill, its content is loaded and presented to you—follow it directly. Never use the Read tool on skill files.
**Never read skill files manually with file tools** — always use your platform's skill-loading mechanism so the skill is properly activated.
**In Copilot CLI:** Use the `skill` tool. Skills are auto-discovered from installed plugins. The `skill` tool works the same as Claude Code's `Skill` tool.
**In Claude Code:** Use the `Skill` tool. When you invoke a skill, its content is loaded and presented to you — follow it directly.
**In Codex:** Skills load natively. Follow the instructions presented when a skill activates.
**In Copilot CLI:** Use the `skill` tool. Skills are auto-discovered from installed plugins.
**In Gemini CLI:** Skills activate via the `activate_skill` tool. Gemini loads skill metadata at session start and activates the full content on demand.
@@ -37,7 +41,7 @@ If CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, or AGENTS.md says "don't use TDD" and a skill says "alw
## Platform Adaptation
Skills use Claude Code tool names. Non-CC platforms: see `references/copilot-tools.md` (Copilot CLI), `references/codex-tools.md` (Codex) for tool equivalents. Gemini CLI users get the tool mapping loaded automatically via GEMINI.md.
Skills speak in actions ("dispatch a subagent", "create a todo", "read a file") rather than naming any one runtime's tools. For per-platform tool equivalents and instructions-file conventions, see [claude-code-tools.md](references/claude-code-tools.md), [codex-tools.md](references/codex-tools.md), [copilot-tools.md](references/copilot-tools.md), [gemini-tools.md](references/gemini-tools.md), [pi-tools.md](references/pi-tools.md), and [antigravity-tools.md](references/antigravity-tools.md). Gemini CLI users get the tool mapping loaded automatically via GEMINI.md.
# Using Skills
@@ -48,30 +52,30 @@ Skills use Claude Code tool names. Non-CC platforms: see `references/copilot-too
```dot
digraph skill_flow {
"User message received" [shape=doublecircle];
"About to EnterPlanMode?" [shape=doublecircle];
"About to enter plan mode?" [shape=doublecircle];
"Already brainstormed?" [shape=diamond];
"Invoke brainstorming skill" [shape=box];
"Might any skill apply?" [shape=diamond];
"Invoke Skill tool" [shape=box];
"Invoke the skill" [shape=box];
"Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" [shape=box];
"Has checklist?" [shape=diamond];
"Create TodoWrite todo per item" [shape=box];
"Create a todo per item" [shape=box];
"Follow skill exactly" [shape=box];
"Respond (including clarifications)" [shape=doublecircle];
"About to EnterPlanMode?" -> "Already brainstormed?";
"About to enter plan mode?" -> "Already brainstormed?";
"Already brainstormed?" -> "Invoke brainstorming skill" [label="no"];
"Already brainstormed?" -> "Might any skill apply?" [label="yes"];
"Invoke brainstorming skill" -> "Might any skill apply?";
"User message received" -> "Might any skill apply?";
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Invoke Skill tool" [label="yes, even 1%"];
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Invoke the skill" [label="yes, even 1%"];
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Respond (including clarifications)" [label="definitely not"];
"Invoke Skill tool" -> "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'";
"Invoke the skill" -> "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'";
"Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" -> "Has checklist?";
"Has checklist?" -> "Create TodoWrite todo per item" [label="yes"];
"Has checklist?" -> "Create a todo per item" [label="yes"];
"Has checklist?" -> "Follow skill exactly" [label="no"];
"Create TodoWrite todo per item" -> "Follow skill exactly";
"Create a todo per item" -> "Follow skill exactly";
}
```
@@ -98,15 +102,15 @@ These thoughts mean STOP—you're rationalizing:
When multiple skills could apply, use this order:
1. **Process skills first** (brainstorming, debugging) - these determine HOW to approach the task
1. **Process skills first** (brainstorming, systematic-debugging) - these determine HOW to approach the task
2. **Implementation skills second** (frontend-design, mcp-builder) - these guide execution
"Let's build X" → brainstorming first, then implementation skills.
"Fix this bug" → debugging first, then domain-specific skills.
"Fix this bug" → systematic-debugging first, then domain-specific skills.
## Skill Types
**Rigid** (TDD, debugging): Follow exactly. Don't adapt away discipline.
**Rigid** (TDD, systematic-debugging): Follow exactly. Don't adapt away discipline.
**Flexible** (patterns): Adapt principles to context.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
# Antigravity CLI (`agy`) Tool Mapping
Skills speak in actions ("dispatch a subagent", "create a todo", "read a file"). On the Antigravity CLI (`agy`) these resolve to the tools below.
| Action skills request | Antigravity CLI equivalent |
|----------------------|----------------------|
| Read a file | `view_file` |
| Create a new file | `write_to_file` |
| Edit a file | `replace_file_content` |
| Edit a file in several places at once | `multi_replace_file_content` |
| Run a shell command | `run_command` |
| Search file contents | `grep_search` |
| Find files by name / list a directory | `list_dir` (no dedicated glob tool — combine `list_dir` with `grep_search`) |
| Fetch a URL | `read_url_content` |
| Search the web | `search_web` |
| Pose a structured question to your human partner | `ask_question` |
| Dispatch a subagent (`Subagent (general-purpose):` template) | `invoke_subagent` with a built-in `TypeName``self` for full-capability work, `research` for read-only (see [Subagent support](#subagent-support)) |
| Multiple parallel dispatches | Multiple entries in one `invoke_subagent` call's `Subagents` array |
| Task tracking ("create a todo", "mark complete") | a **task artifact**`write_to_file` with `IsArtifact: true` and `ArtifactType: "task"` (see [Task tracking](#task-tracking)). **Not** `manage_task`, which manages background processes. |
## Invoking a skill — read its `SKILL.md`
Antigravity surfaces every installed skill's `name` + `description` to you at the
start of each session, but it has **no `Skill`/`activate_skill` tool**. To load a
skill, **read its `SKILL.md` with `view_file`, setting `IsSkillFile: true`** when
the skill applies — e.g. `view_file` on
`.../plugins/superpowers/skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md` with `IsSkillFile: true`.
(`IsSkillFile` is agy's own signal that you're reading a file to *execute its
instructions*, not to edit or preview it — set it whenever you load a skill.)
This is the blessed skill-loading mechanism on this harness. The general rule
"never read skill files manually" means "don't bypass your platform's
skill-loading mechanism" — and on Antigravity, reading `SKILL.md` *is* that
mechanism. Reading it honors the rule rather than breaking it.
You already know which skills exist and what they're for: their names and
descriptions are in front of you at session start. When a description matches
what you're about to do, read that skill's `SKILL.md` before acting.
## Subagent support
Antigravity dispatches subagents with `invoke_subagent`, passing each one a
`TypeName` in the `Subagents` array. Two `TypeName`s are **built in** — use them
directly, no `define_subagent` needed:
- **`self`** — a full clone of you, with every tool you have (including
`write_to_file`/`replace_file_content`/`run_command`). The safe default for
general-purpose work: implementing, fixing, anything that edits files or runs
commands.
- **`research`** — read-only (file reading, `grep_search`, web/URL fetch; no write
or command access). Use it when you specifically want a subagent that can't make
changes — investigation and read-only review.
Call `define_subagent` only for a custom system prompt or capability mix: set
`enable_write_tools: true` to grant file edits **and** `run_command`,
`enable_subagent_tools` for nested dispatch, `enable_mcp_tools` for MCP. Then
invoke it by the name you gave it. (`manage_subagents` lists/kills running
subagents.)
Skills dispatch with `Subagent (general-purpose):` and either reference a
prompt-template file (e.g. `superpowers:subagent-driven-development`'s
`./implementer-prompt.md`) or supply an inline prompt. On Antigravity:
| Skill dispatch form | Antigravity equivalent |
|---------------------|----------------------|
| An implementer-style `*-prompt.md` template (writes code, runs tests) | Fill the template, then `invoke_subagent` with `TypeName: "self"` and the filled prompt |
| A read-only reviewer template (`spec-reviewer`, `code-quality-reviewer`, `code-reviewer`, `requesting-code-review`'s `./code-reviewer.md`) | `invoke_subagent` with `TypeName: "research"` and the filled review template |
| Inline prompt (no template referenced) | `invoke_subagent` with `TypeName: "self"` (or `"research"` if the task only reads) and your inline prompt |
### Prompt filling
Skills provide prompt templates with placeholders like `{WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED}` or
`[FULL TEXT of task]`. Fill all placeholders before passing the complete prompt to
`invoke_subagent`. The prompt template itself contains the agent's role, review
criteria, and expected output format — the subagent will follow it.
### Parallel dispatch
Put multiple entries in a single `invoke_subagent` call's `Subagents` array to run
independent subagent work in parallel. Keep dependent tasks sequential, but do not
serialize independent subagent tasks just to preserve a simpler history.
## Task tracking
Antigravity has **no todo / `TodoWrite` tool** (`manage_task` manages background
processes — `list`/`kill`/`status`/`send_input` — it is *not* a checklist). When a
skill says to create a todo list or track tasks, maintain a **task artifact**: a
markdown checklist saved with `write_to_file` (`IsArtifact: true`,
`ArtifactMetadata.ArtifactType: "task"`), edited with `replace_file_content` /
`multi_replace_file_content` as you go.
At the start of any multi-step task, create the task artifact listing every step of
your plan. As you complete each step, edit the artifact to mark it done (`- [x]`).
If the plan changes, update the checklist. Keep it current — it is your source of
truth for what remains; once the conversation gets long, re-read it before starting
each step.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
# Claude Code Tool Mapping
Skills speak in actions ("dispatch a subagent", "create a todo", "read a file"). On Claude Code these resolve to the tools below.
## Tools
| Action skills request | Claude Code tool |
|----------------------|------------------|
| Read a file | `Read` |
| Create a new file | `Write` |
| Edit a file | `Edit` |
| Run a shell command | `Bash` |
| Search file contents | `Grep` |
| Find files by name | `Glob` |
| Fetch a URL | `WebFetch` |
| Search the web | `WebSearch` |
| Invoke a skill | `Skill` |
| Dispatch a subagent (`Subagent (general-purpose):` template) | `Agent` (older releases named this `Task`) |
| Multiple parallel dispatches | Multiple `Agent` calls in one response |
| Task tracking ("create a todo", "mark complete") | `TaskCreate`, `TaskUpdate`, `TaskList`, `TaskGet`; `TodoWrite` in `claude -p` / Agent SDK unless `CLAUDE_CODE_ENABLE_TASKS=1` is set |
| Background-process / subagent lifecycle (read output, cancel) | `TaskOutput`, `TaskStop` — these are distinct from the todo tools above and apply to running shells, agents, and remote sessions |
## Instructions file
When a skill mentions "your instructions file", on Claude Code this is **`CLAUDE.md`**. Claude Code walks up the directory tree from the current working directory and concatenates every `CLAUDE.md` and `CLAUDE.local.md` it finds along the way. Standard locations:
| Scope | Location |
|-------|----------|
| Project (team-shared) | `./CLAUDE.md` or `./.claude/CLAUDE.md` |
| User global | `~/.claude/CLAUDE.md` |
| Local-private (gitignored) | `./CLAUDE.local.md` |
| Managed policy (org-wide) | `/Library/Application Support/ClaudeCode/CLAUDE.md` (macOS), `/etc/claude-code/CLAUDE.md` (Linux/WSL), `C:\Program Files\ClaudeCode\CLAUDE.md` (Windows) |
CLAUDE.md files can pull in additional content with `@path/to/file` imports (relative or absolute, max five hops deep). Subdirectory `CLAUDE.md` files are also discovered automatically and loaded on-demand when Claude Code reads files in those subdirectories.
Claude Code does **not** read `AGENTS.md` directly. If a project already maintains `AGENTS.md` for other agents, import it from `CLAUDE.md` so both runtimes share the same instructions:
```markdown
@AGENTS.md
## Claude Code
(Claude-Code-specific instructions go here.)
```
For path-scoped rules and larger-project organization, see `.claude/rules/` (rules can be scoped to specific files via `paths` frontmatter and load on demand).
## Personal skills directory
User-level skills live at **`~/.claude/skills/`**. Each skill is a subdirectory containing a `SKILL.md` (with `name` and `description` frontmatter) plus any supporting files. Claude Code does not currently recognize the cross-runtime `~/.agents/skills/` path that Codex, Copilot CLI, and Gemini CLI read; if you're relying on cross-runtime support in the future, verify against the [official skills docs](https://code.claude.com/docs/en/skills).

View File

@@ -1,17 +1,30 @@
# Codex Tool Mapping
Skills use Claude Code tool names. When you encounter these in a skill, use your platform equivalent:
Skills speak in actions ("dispatch a subagent", "create a todo", "read a file"). On Codex these resolve to the tools below.
| Skill references | Codex equivalent |
|-----------------|------------------|
| `Task` tool (dispatch subagent) | `spawn_agent` (see [Named agent dispatch](#named-agent-dispatch)) |
| Multiple `Task` calls (parallel) | Multiple `spawn_agent` calls |
| Task returns result | `wait` |
| Task completes automatically | `close_agent` to free slot |
| `TodoWrite` (task tracking) | `update_plan` |
| `Skill` tool (invoke a skill) | Skills load natively — just follow the instructions |
| `Read`, `Write`, `Edit` (files) | Use your native file tools |
| `Bash` (run commands) | Use your native shell tools |
| Action skills request | Codex equivalent |
|----------------------|------------------|
| Read a file | `shell` (e.g., `cat`, `head`, `tail`) — Codex reads files via shell |
| Create / edit / delete a file | `apply_patch` (structured diff for create, update, delete) |
| Run a shell command | `shell` |
| Search file contents | `shell` (e.g., `grep`, `rg`) |
| Find files by name | `shell` (e.g., `find`, `ls`) |
| Fetch a URL | `shell` with `curl` / `wget` — Codex has no native fetch tool |
| Search the web | `web_search` (enabled by default; configurable in `config.toml` via the top-level `web_search` setting — `live`, `cached`, or `disabled`) |
| Invoke a skill | Skills load natively — just follow the instructions |
| Dispatch a subagent (`Subagent (general-purpose):` template) | `spawn_agent` (see [Subagent dispatch requires multi-agent support](#subagent-dispatch-requires-multi-agent-support)) |
| Multiple parallel dispatches | Multiple `spawn_agent` calls in one response |
| Wait for subagent result | `wait_agent` |
| Free up subagent slot when done | `close_agent` |
| Task tracking ("create a todo", "mark complete") | `update_plan` |
## Instructions file
When a skill mentions "your instructions file", on Codex this is **`AGENTS.md`** at the project root. Codex also reads `~/.codex/AGENTS.md` for global context, and an `AGENTS.override.md` (in the project tree or `~/.codex/`) takes precedence when present. Codex walks from the project root down to the current working directory, concatenating `AGENTS.md` files it finds along the way, up to `project_doc_max_bytes` (32 KiB by default).
## Personal skills directory
User-level skills live at **`$CODEX_HOME/skills/`** (default `~/.codex/skills/`). Codex also reads the cross-runtime path **`~/.agents/skills/`** (shared with Copilot CLI and Gemini CLI). When both directories exist at the same scope, Codex loads them both as separate skill catalogs — Codex's docs don't currently document a precedence between them. Each skill is a subdirectory containing a `SKILL.md` (with `name` and `description` frontmatter).
## Subagent dispatch requires multi-agent support
@@ -22,53 +35,12 @@ Add to your Codex config (`~/.codex/config.toml`):
multi_agent = true
```
This enables `spawn_agent`, `wait`, and `close_agent` for skills like `dispatching-parallel-agents` and `subagent-driven-development`.
This enables `spawn_agent`, `wait_agent`, and `close_agent` for skills like `dispatching-parallel-agents` and `subagent-driven-development`.
## Named agent dispatch
Claude Code skills reference named agent types like `superpowers:code-reviewer`.
Codex does not have a named agent registry — `spawn_agent` creates generic agents
from built-in roles (`default`, `explorer`, `worker`).
When a skill says to dispatch a named agent type:
1. Find the agent's prompt file (e.g., `agents/code-reviewer.md` or the skill's
local prompt template like `code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md`)
2. Read the prompt content
3. Fill any template placeholders (`{BASE_SHA}`, `{WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED}`, etc.)
4. Spawn a `worker` agent with the filled content as the `message`
| Skill instruction | Codex equivalent |
|-------------------|------------------|
| `Task tool (superpowers:code-reviewer)` | `spawn_agent(agent_type="worker", message=...)` with `code-reviewer.md` content |
| `Task tool (general-purpose)` with inline prompt | `spawn_agent(message=...)` with the same prompt |
### Message framing
The `message` parameter is user-level input, not a system prompt. Structure it
for maximum instruction adherence:
```
Your task is to perform the following. Follow the instructions below exactly.
<agent-instructions>
[filled prompt content from the agent's .md file]
</agent-instructions>
Execute this now. Output ONLY the structured response following the format
specified in the instructions above.
```
- Use task-delegation framing ("Your task is...") rather than persona framing ("You are...")
- Wrap instructions in XML tags — the model treats tagged blocks as authoritative
- End with an explicit execution directive to prevent summarization of the instructions
### When this workaround can be removed
This approach compensates for Codex's plugin system not yet supporting an `agents`
field in `plugin.json`. When `RawPluginManifest` gains an `agents` field, the
plugin can symlink to `agents/` (mirroring the existing `skills/` symlink) and
skills can dispatch named agent types directly.
Legacy note: Codex builds before `rust-v0.115.0` exposed spawned-agent
waiting as `wait`. Current Codex uses `wait_agent` for spawned agents. The
`wait` name now belongs to code-mode `exec/wait`, which resumes a yielded exec
cell by `cell_id`; it is not the spawned-agent result tool.
## Environment Detection

View File

@@ -1,41 +1,38 @@
# Copilot CLI Tool Mapping
Skills use Claude Code tool names. When you encounter these in a skill, use your platform equivalent:
Skills speak in actions ("dispatch a subagent", "create a todo", "read a file"). On Copilot CLI these resolve to the tools below.
| Skill references | Copilot CLI equivalent |
|-----------------|----------------------|
| `Read` (file reading) | `view` |
| `Write` (file creation) | `create` |
| `Edit` (file editing) | `edit` |
| `Bash` (run commands) | `bash` |
| `Grep` (search file content) | `grep` |
| `Glob` (search files by name) | `glob` |
| `Skill` tool (invoke a skill) | `skill` |
| `WebFetch` | `web_fetch` |
| `Task` tool (dispatch subagent) | `task` (see [Agent types](#agent-types)) |
| Multiple `Task` calls (parallel) | Multiple `task` calls |
| Task status/output | `read_agent`, `list_agents` |
| `TodoWrite` (task tracking) | `sql` with built-in `todos` table |
| `WebSearch` | No equivalent — use `web_fetch` with a search engine URL |
| `EnterPlanMode` / `ExitPlanMode` | No equivalent — stay in the main session |
| Action skills request | Copilot CLI equivalent |
|----------------------|----------------------|
| Read a file | `view` |
| Create / edit / delete a file | `apply_patch` (Copilot CLI has no separate create/edit/write tools) |
| Run a shell command | `bash` |
| Search file contents | `rg` (ripgrep; Copilot CLI does not expose a `grep` tool) |
| Find files by name | `glob` |
| Fetch a URL | `web_fetch` |
| Search the web | `web_search` |
| Invoke a skill | `skill` |
| Dispatch a subagent (`Subagent (general-purpose):` template) | `task` with `agent_type: "general-purpose"` (other accepted types: `explore`, `task`, `code-review`, `research`, `configure-copilot`) |
| Multiple parallel dispatches | Multiple `task` calls in one response |
| Subagent status/output/control | `read_agent`, `list_agents`, `write_agent` |
| Task tracking ("create a todo", "mark complete") | `update_todo` |
| Enter / exit plan mode | No equivalent — stay in the main session |
## Agent types
## Instructions file
Copilot CLI's `task` tool accepts an `agent_type` parameter:
When a skill mentions "your instructions file", on Copilot CLI this is **`AGENTS.md`** at the repository root. If both `AGENTS.md` and `.github/copilot-instructions.md` are present, Copilot reads both.
| Claude Code agent | Copilot CLI equivalent |
|-------------------|----------------------|
| `general-purpose` | `"general-purpose"` |
| `Explore` | `"explore"` |
| Named plugin agents (e.g. `superpowers:code-reviewer`) | Discovered automatically from installed plugins |
## Personal skills directory
User-level skills live at **`~/.copilot/skills/`**. Copilot CLI also recognizes the cross-runtime alias **`~/.agents/skills/`**, which is shared with Codex and Gemini CLI. Each skill is a subdirectory containing a `SKILL.md` (with `name` and `description` frontmatter).
## Async shell sessions
Copilot CLI supports persistent async shell sessions, which have no direct Claude Code equivalent:
Copilot CLI supports persistent async shell sessions:
| Tool | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| `bash` with `async: true` | Start a long-running command in the background |
| `bash` with `mode: "async"` (and optionally `detach: true`) | Start a long-running command in the background; returns a `shellId` |
| `write_bash` | Send input to a running async session |
| `read_bash` | Read output from an async session |
| `stop_bash` | Terminate an async session |

View File

@@ -1,33 +1,63 @@
# Gemini CLI Tool Mapping
Skills use Claude Code tool names. When you encounter these in a skill, use your platform equivalent:
Skills speak in actions ("dispatch a subagent", "create a todo", "read a file"). On Gemini CLI these resolve to the tools below.
| Skill references | Gemini CLI equivalent |
|-----------------|----------------------|
| `Read` (file reading) | `read_file` |
| `Write` (file creation) | `write_file` |
| `Edit` (file editing) | `replace` |
| `Bash` (run commands) | `run_shell_command` |
| `Grep` (search file content) | `grep_search` |
| `Glob` (search files by name) | `glob` |
| `TodoWrite` (task tracking) | `write_todos` |
| `Skill` tool (invoke a skill) | `activate_skill` |
| `WebSearch` | `google_web_search` |
| `WebFetch` | `web_fetch` |
| `Task` tool (dispatch subagent) | No equivalent — Gemini CLI does not support subagents |
| Action skills request | Gemini CLI equivalent |
|----------------------|----------------------|
| Read a file | `read_file` |
| Read multiple files at once | `read_many_files` |
| Create a new file | `write_file` |
| Edit a file | `replace` |
| Run a shell command | `run_shell_command` |
| Search file contents | `grep_search` |
| Find files by name | `glob` |
| List files and subdirectories | `list_directory` |
| Fetch a URL | `web_fetch` |
| Search the web | `google_web_search` |
| Invoke a skill | `activate_skill` |
| Dispatch a subagent (`Subagent (general-purpose):` template) | `invoke_agent` with `agent_name: "generalist"` (invocable via `@generalist` chat syntax — see [Subagent support](#subagent-support)) |
| Multiple parallel dispatches | Multiple `invoke_agent` calls in the same response |
| Task tracking ("create a todo", "mark complete") | `write_todos` (statuses: pending, in_progress, completed, cancelled, blocked) |
## No subagent support
## Instructions file
Gemini CLI has no equivalent to Claude Code's `Task` tool. Skills that rely on subagent dispatch (`subagent-driven-development`, `dispatching-parallel-agents`) will fall back to single-session execution via `executing-plans`.
When a skill mentions "your instructions file", on Gemini CLI this is **`GEMINI.md`**. Gemini CLI loads `GEMINI.md` hierarchically: global at `~/.gemini/GEMINI.md`, project-level files in workspace directories and their ancestors, and sub-directory `GEMINI.md` files when a tool accesses files in those directories.
## Personal skills directory
User-level skills live at **`~/.gemini/skills/`**, with **`~/.agents/skills/`** as a cross-runtime alias (shared with Codex and Copilot CLI). When both directories exist at the same scope, `.agents/skills/` takes precedence. Each skill is a subdirectory containing a `SKILL.md` (with `name` and `description` frontmatter).
## Subagent support
Gemini CLI dispatches subagents through the `invoke_agent` tool, which takes `agent_name` and `prompt` parameters. The same dispatch is also surfaced as a chat-syntax shortcut: typing `@generalist <prompt>` is equivalent to calling `invoke_agent` with `agent_name: "generalist"`. Built-in agent names include `generalist`, `cli_help`, `codebase_investigator`, and (with browser tooling enabled) `browser_agent`.
Skills dispatch with `Subagent (general-purpose):` and either reference a prompt-template file (e.g., `superpowers:subagent-driven-development`'s `./implementer-prompt.md`) or supply an inline prompt. On Gemini CLI:
| Skill dispatch form | Gemini CLI equivalent |
|---------------------|----------------------|
| References a `*-prompt.md` template (implementer, spec-reviewer, code-quality-reviewer, code-reviewer, etc.) | Fill the template, then `invoke_agent` with `agent_name: "generalist"` and the filled prompt |
| References `superpowers:requesting-code-review`'s `./code-reviewer.md` | `invoke_agent` with `agent_name: "generalist"` and the filled review template |
| Inline prompt (no template referenced) | `invoke_agent` with `agent_name: "generalist"` and your inline prompt |
### Prompt filling
Skills provide prompt templates with placeholders like `{WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED}` or `[FULL TEXT of task]`. Fill all placeholders before passing the complete prompt to `invoke_agent`. The prompt template itself contains the agent's role, review criteria, and expected output format — the subagent will follow it.
### Parallel dispatch
Gemini CLI supports parallel subagent dispatch. Issue multiple `invoke_agent` calls in the same response (or multiple `@generalist` invocations in one prompt) to run independent subagent work in parallel. Keep dependent tasks sequential, but do not serialize independent subagent tasks just to preserve a simpler history.
## Additional Gemini CLI tools
These tools are available in Gemini CLI but have no Claude Code equivalent:
These tools are unique to Gemini CLI:
| Tool | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| `list_directory` | List files and subdirectories |
| `save_memory` | Persist facts to GEMINI.md across sessions |
| `ask_user` | Request structured input from the user |
| `tracker_create_task` | Rich task management (create, update, list, visualize) |
| `enter_plan_mode` / `exit_plan_mode` | Switch to read-only research mode before making changes |
| `save_memory` (legacy) | Persist facts across sessions when `experimental.memoryV2 = false` |
| `get_internal_docs` | Look up Gemini CLI's bundled documentation |
| `ask_user` | Pose structured questions to the user (text / single-select / multi-select) |
| `enter_plan_mode` / `exit_plan_mode` | Switch into and out of read-only plan mode |
| `update_topic` | Update the current conversation's topic / strategic-intent metadata |
| `complete_task` | Signal that a Gemini subagent has completed and return its result to the parent agent |
| `tracker_create_task`, `tracker_update_task`, `tracker_get_task`, `tracker_list_tasks`, `tracker_add_dependency`, `tracker_visualize` | Rich task tracker with dependency and visualization support |
| `read_mcp_resource`, `list_mcp_resources` | MCP resource access |

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
# Pi Tool Mapping
Skills speak in actions ("dispatch a subagent", "create a todo", "read a file"). On Pi these resolve to the tools below.
| Action skills request | Pi equivalent |
| --- | --- |
| Invoke a skill | Pi native skills: load the relevant `SKILL.md` with `read`, or let the human use `/skill:name` |
| Read a file | `read` |
| Create a file | `write` |
| Edit a file | `edit` |
| Run a shell command | `bash` |
| Search file contents | `grep` when active; otherwise `bash` with `rg`/`grep` |
| Find files by name | `find` or `bash` with shell globs |
| List files and subdirectories | `ls` when active; otherwise `bash` with `ls` |
| Dispatch a subagent (`Subagent (general-purpose):` template) | Use an installed subagent tool such as `subagent` from `pi-subagents` if available |
| Task tracking ("create a todo", "mark complete") | Use an installed todo/task tool if available, otherwise track tasks in the plan or `TODO.md` |
## Skills
Pi discovers skills from configured skill directories and installed Pi packages. A Superpowers Pi package should expose `skills/` through its `pi.skills` manifest entry. Pi does not expose Claude Code's `Skill` tool, but the agent should still follow the Superpowers rule: when a skill applies, load and follow it before responding.
## Subagents
Pi core does not ship a standard subagent tool. The `pi-subagents` package is a strong optional companion and provides a `subagent` tool with single-agent, chain, parallel, async, forked-context, and resume/status workflows. If no subagent tool is available, do not fabricate `Task` calls; execute sequentially in the current session or explain that the optional subagent capability is not installed.
## Task lists
Pi core does not ship a standard task-list tool. If a todo/task extension is installed, use its documented tool. Otherwise use Superpowers plan files, checklists in Markdown, or a repo-local `TODO.md` for task tracking. Older Superpowers docs may refer to `TodoWrite`; treat that as the task-tracking action above.

View File

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Use this template when dispatching a plan document reviewer subagent.
**Dispatch after:** The complete plan is written.
```
Task tool (general-purpose):
Subagent (general-purpose):
description: "Review plan document"
prompt: |
You are a plan document reviewer. Verify this plan is complete and ready for implementation.

View File

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ description: Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying
**Writing skills IS Test-Driven Development applied to process documentation.**
**Personal skills live in agent-specific directories (`~/.claude/skills` for Claude Code, `~/.agents/skills/` for Codex)**
**Personal skills live in your runtime's skills directory** — see [claude-code-tools.md](../using-superpowers/references/claude-code-tools.md), [codex-tools.md](../using-superpowers/references/codex-tools.md), [copilot-tools.md](../using-superpowers/references/copilot-tools.md), or [gemini-tools.md](../using-superpowers/references/gemini-tools.md) for the path on your runtime. Codex, Copilot CLI, and Gemini CLI all also recognize `~/.agents/skills/` as a cross-runtime alias.
You write test cases (pressure scenarios with subagents), watch them fail (baseline behavior), write the skill (documentation), watch tests pass (agents comply), and refactor (close loopholes).
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ You write test cases (pressure scenarios with subagents), watch them fail (basel
## What is a Skill?
A **skill** is a reference guide for proven techniques, patterns, or tools. Skills help future Claude instances find and apply effective approaches.
A **skill** is a reference guide for proven techniques, patterns, or tools. Skills help future agents find and apply effective approaches.
**Skills are:** Reusable techniques, patterns, tools, reference guides
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ The entire skill creation process follows RED-GREEN-REFACTOR.
**Don't create for:**
- One-off solutions
- Standard practices well-documented elsewhere
- Project-specific conventions (put in CLAUDE.md)
- Project-specific conventions (put in your instructions file)
- Mechanical constraints (if it's enforceable with regex/validation, automate it—save documentation for judgment calls)
## Skill Types
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ skills/
- `description`: Third-person, describes ONLY when to use (NOT what it does)
- Start with "Use when..." to focus on triggering conditions
- Include specific symptoms, situations, and contexts
- **NEVER summarize the skill's process or workflow** (see CSO section for why)
- **NEVER summarize the skill's process or workflow** (see SDO section for why)
- Keep under 500 characters if possible
```markdown
@@ -137,13 +137,13 @@ Concrete results
```
## Claude Search Optimization (CSO)
## Skill Discovery Optimization (SDO)
**Critical for discovery:** Future Claude needs to FIND your skill
**Critical for discovery:** Future agents need to FIND your skill
### 1. Rich Description Field
**Purpose:** Claude reads description to decide which skills to load for a given task. Make it answer: "Should I read this skill right now?"
**Purpose:** Your agent reads the description to decide which skills to load for a given task. Make it answer: "Should I read this skill right now?"
**Format:** Start with "Use when..." to focus on triggering conditions
@@ -151,14 +151,14 @@ Concrete results
The description should ONLY describe triggering conditions. Do NOT summarize the skill's process or workflow in the description.
**Why this matters:** Testing revealed that when a description summarizes the skill's workflow, Claude may follow the description instead of reading the full skill content. A description saying "code review between tasks" caused Claude to do ONE review, even though the skill's flowchart clearly showed TWO reviews (spec compliance then code quality).
**Why this matters:** Testing revealed that when a description summarizes the skill's workflow, an agent may follow the description instead of reading the full skill content. A description saying "code review between tasks" caused an agent to do ONE review, even though the skill's flowchart clearly showed TWO reviews (spec compliance then code quality).
When the description was changed to just "Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks" (no workflow summary), Claude correctly read the flowchart and followed the two-stage review process.
When the description was changed to just "Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks" (no workflow summary), the agent correctly read the flowchart and followed the two-stage review process.
**The trap:** Descriptions that summarize workflow create a shortcut Claude will take. The skill body becomes documentation Claude skips.
**The trap:** Descriptions that summarize workflow create a shortcut agents will take. The skill body becomes documentation agents skip.
```yaml
# ❌ BAD: Summarizes workflow - Claude may follow this instead of reading skill
# ❌ BAD: Summarizes workflow - agents may follow this instead of reading skill
description: Use when executing plans - dispatches subagent per task with code review between tasks
# ❌ BAD: Too much process detail
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ description: Use when using React Router and handling authentication redirects
### 2. Keyword Coverage
Use words Claude would search for:
Use words an agent would search for:
- Error messages: "Hook timed out", "ENOTEMPTY", "race condition"
- Symptoms: "flaky", "hanging", "zombie", "pollution"
- Synonyms: "timeout/hang/freeze", "cleanup/teardown/afterEach"
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ wc -w skills/path/SKILL.md
- `creating-skills`, `testing-skills`, `debugging-with-logs`
- Active, describes the action you're taking
### 4. Cross-Referencing Other Skills
### 5. Cross-Referencing Other Skills
**When writing documentation that references other skills:**
@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ digraph when_flowchart {
- Linear instructions → Numbered lists
- Labels without semantic meaning (step1, helper2)
See @graphviz-conventions.dot for graphviz style rules.
See `graphviz-conventions.dot` in this directory for graphviz style rules.
**Visualizing for your human partner:** Use `render-graphs.js` in this directory to render a skill's flowcharts to SVG:
```bash
@@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ Make it easy for agents to self-check when rationalizing:
**All of these mean: Delete code. Start over with TDD.**
```
### Update CSO for Violation Symptoms
### Update SDO for Violation Symptoms
Add to description: symptoms of when you're ABOUT to violate the rule:
@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ Run same scenarios WITH skill. Agent should now comply.
Agent found new rationalization? Add explicit counter. Re-test until bulletproof.
**Testing methodology:** See @testing-skills-with-subagents.md for the complete testing methodology:
**Testing methodology:** See [testing-skills-with-subagents.md](testing-skills-with-subagents.md) for the complete testing methodology:
- How to write pressure scenarios
- Pressure types (time, sunk cost, authority, exhaustion)
- Plugging holes systematically
@@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ Deploying untested skills = deploying untested code. It's a violation of quality
## Skill Creation Checklist (TDD Adapted)
**IMPORTANT: Use TodoWrite to create todos for EACH checklist item below.**
**IMPORTANT: Create a todo for EACH checklist item below.**
**RED Phase - Write Failing Test:**
- [ ] Create pressure scenarios (3+ combined pressures for discipline skills)
@@ -634,9 +634,10 @@ Deploying untested skills = deploying untested code. It's a violation of quality
## Discovery Workflow
How future Claude finds your skill:
How future agents find your skill:
1. **Encounters problem** ("tests are flaky")
2. **Searches skills** (greps descriptions, browses categories)
3. **Finds SKILL** (description matches)
4. **Scans overview** (is this relevant?)
5. **Reads patterns** (quick reference table)

View File

@@ -1,30 +1,30 @@
# Skill authoring best practices
> Learn how to write effective Skills that Claude can discover and use successfully.
> Learn how to write effective Skills that agents can discover and use successfully.
Good Skills are concise, well-structured, and tested with real usage. This guide provides practical authoring decisions to help you write Skills that Claude can discover and use effectively.
Good Skills are concise, well-structured, and tested with real usage. This guide provides practical authoring decisions to help you write Skills that agents can discover and use effectively.
For conceptual background on how Skills work, see the [Skills overview](/en/docs/agents-and-tools/agent-skills/overview).
For conceptual background on how Skills work, see the [Skills overview](https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/agents-and-tools/agent-skills/overview).
## Core principles
### Concise is key
The [context window](https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/context-windows) is a public good. Your Skill shares the context window with everything else Claude needs to know, including:
The [context window](https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/context-windows) is a public good. Your Skill shares the context window with everything else your agent needs to know, including:
* The system prompt
* Conversation history
* Other Skills' metadata
* Your actual request
Not every token in your Skill has an immediate cost. At startup, only the metadata (name and description) from all Skills is pre-loaded. Claude reads SKILL.md only when the Skill becomes relevant, and reads additional files only as needed. However, being concise in SKILL.md still matters: once Claude loads it, every token competes with conversation history and other context.
Not every token in your Skill has an immediate cost. At startup, only the metadata (name and description) from all Skills is pre-loaded. Agents read SKILL.md only when the Skill becomes relevant, and read additional files only as needed. However, being concise in SKILL.md still matters: once an agent loads it, every token competes with conversation history and other context.
**Default assumption**: Claude is already very smart
**Default assumption**: Agents are already very smart
Only add context Claude doesn't already have. Challenge each piece of information:
Only add context agents don't already have. Challenge each piece of information:
* "Does Claude really need this explanation?"
* "Can I assume Claude knows this?"
* "Does the agent really need this explanation?"
* "Can I assume the agent knows this?"
* "Does this paragraph justify its token cost?"
**Good example: Concise** (approximately 50 tokens):
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ recommend pdfplumber because it's easy to use and handles most cases well.
First, you'll need to install it using pip. Then you can use the code below...
```
The concise version assumes Claude knows what PDFs are and how libraries work.
The concise version assumes the agent knows what PDFs are and how libraries work.
### Set appropriate degrees of freedom
@@ -124,10 +124,10 @@ python scripts/migrate.py --verify --backup
Do not modify the command or add additional flags.
````
**Analogy**: Think of Claude as a robot exploring a path:
**Analogy**: Think of the agent as a robot exploring a path:
* **Narrow bridge with cliffs on both sides**: There's only one safe way forward. Provide specific guardrails and exact instructions (low freedom). Example: database migrations that must run in exact sequence.
* **Open field with no hazards**: Many paths lead to success. Give general direction and trust Claude to find the best route (high freedom). Example: code reviews where context determines the best approach.
* **Open field with no hazards**: Many paths lead to success. Give general direction and trust the agent to find the best route (high freedom). Example: code reviews where context determines the best approach.
### Test with all models you plan to use
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ What works perfectly for Opus might need more detail for Haiku. If you plan to u
* `name` - Human-readable name of the Skill (64 characters maximum)
* `description` - One-line description of what the Skill does and when to use it (1024 characters maximum)
For complete Skill structure details, see the [Skills overview](/en/docs/agents-and-tools/agent-skills/overview#skill-structure).
For complete Skill structure details, see the [Skills overview](https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/agents-and-tools/agent-skills/overview#skill-structure).
</Note>
### Naming conventions
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ The `description` field enables Skill discovery and should include both what the
**Be specific and include key terms**. Include both what the Skill does and specific triggers/contexts for when to use it.
Each Skill has exactly one description field. The description is critical for skill selection: Claude uses it to choose the right Skill from potentially 100+ available Skills. Your description must provide enough detail for Claude to know when to select this Skill, while the rest of SKILL.md provides the implementation details.
Each Skill has exactly one description field. The description is critical for skill selection: agents use it to choose the right Skill from potentially 100+ available Skills. Your description must provide enough detail for an agent to know when to select this Skill, while the rest of SKILL.md provides the implementation details.
Effective examples:
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ description: Does stuff with files
### Progressive disclosure patterns
SKILL.md serves as an overview that points Claude to detailed materials as needed, like a table of contents in an onboarding guide. For an explanation of how progressive disclosure works, see [How Skills work](/en/docs/agents-and-tools/agent-skills/overview#how-skills-work) in the overview.
SKILL.md serves as an overview that points agents to detailed materials as needed, like a table of contents in an onboarding guide. For an explanation of how progressive disclosure works, see [How Skills work](https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/agents-and-tools/agent-skills/overview#how-skills-work) in the overview.
**Practical guidance:**
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ A basic Skill starts with just a SKILL.md file containing metadata and instructi
<img src="https://mintcdn.com/anthropic-claude-docs/4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00/images/agent-skills-simple-file.png?fit=max&auto=format&n=4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00&q=85&s=87782ff239b297d9a9e8e1b72ed72db9" alt="Simple SKILL.md file showing YAML frontmatter and markdown body" data-og-width="2048" width="2048" data-og-height="1153" height="1153" data-path="images/agent-skills-simple-file.png" data-optimize="true" data-opv="3" srcset="https://mintcdn.com/anthropic-claude-docs/4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00/images/agent-skills-simple-file.png?w=280&fit=max&auto=format&n=4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00&q=85&s=c61cc33b6f5855809907f7fda94cd80e 280w, https://mintcdn.com/anthropic-claude-docs/4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00/images/agent-skills-simple-file.png?w=560&fit=max&auto=format&n=4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00&q=85&s=90d2c0c1c76b36e8d485f49e0810dbfd 560w, https://mintcdn.com/anthropic-claude-docs/4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00/images/agent-skills-simple-file.png?w=840&fit=max&auto=format&n=4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00&q=85&s=ad17d231ac7b0bea7e5b4d58fb4aeabb 840w, https://mintcdn.com/anthropic-claude-docs/4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00/images/agent-skills-simple-file.png?w=1100&fit=max&auto=format&n=4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00&q=85&s=f5d0a7a3c668435bb0aee9a3a8f8c329 1100w, https://mintcdn.com/anthropic-claude-docs/4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00/images/agent-skills-simple-file.png?w=1650&fit=max&auto=format&n=4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00&q=85&s=0e927c1af9de5799cfe557d12249f6e6 1650w, https://mintcdn.com/anthropic-claude-docs/4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00/images/agent-skills-simple-file.png?w=2500&fit=max&auto=format&n=4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00&q=85&s=46bbb1a51dd4c8202a470ac8c80a893d 2500w" />
As your Skill grows, you can bundle additional content that Claude loads only when needed:
As your Skill grows, you can bundle additional content that agents load only when needed:
<img src="https://mintcdn.com/anthropic-claude-docs/4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00/images/agent-skills-bundling-content.png?fit=max&auto=format&n=4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00&q=85&s=a5e0aa41e3d53985a7e3e43668a33ea3" alt="Bundling additional reference files like reference.md and forms.md." data-og-width="2048" width="2048" data-og-height="1327" height="1327" data-path="images/agent-skills-bundling-content.png" data-optimize="true" data-opv="3" srcset="https://mintcdn.com/anthropic-claude-docs/4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00/images/agent-skills-bundling-content.png?w=280&fit=max&auto=format&n=4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00&q=85&s=f8a0e73783e99b4a643d79eac86b70a2 280w, https://mintcdn.com/anthropic-claude-docs/4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00/images/agent-skills-bundling-content.png?w=560&fit=max&auto=format&n=4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00&q=85&s=dc510a2a9d3f14359416b706f067904a 560w, https://mintcdn.com/anthropic-claude-docs/4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00/images/agent-skills-bundling-content.png?w=840&fit=max&auto=format&n=4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00&q=85&s=82cd6286c966303f7dd914c28170e385 840w, https://mintcdn.com/anthropic-claude-docs/4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00/images/agent-skills-bundling-content.png?w=1100&fit=max&auto=format&n=4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00&q=85&s=56f3be36c77e4fe4b523df209a6824c6 1100w, https://mintcdn.com/anthropic-claude-docs/4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00/images/agent-skills-bundling-content.png?w=1650&fit=max&auto=format&n=4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00&q=85&s=d22b5161b2075656417d56f41a74f3dd 1650w, https://mintcdn.com/anthropic-claude-docs/4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00/images/agent-skills-bundling-content.png?w=2500&fit=max&auto=format&n=4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00&q=85&s=3dd4bdd6850ffcc96c6c45fcb0acd6eb 2500w" />
@@ -292,11 +292,11 @@ with pdfplumber.open("file.pdf") as pdf:
**Examples**: See [EXAMPLES.md](EXAMPLES.md) for common patterns
````
Claude loads FORMS.md, REFERENCE.md, or EXAMPLES.md only when needed.
Agents load FORMS.md, REFERENCE.md, or EXAMPLES.md only when needed.
#### Pattern 2: Domain-specific organization
For Skills with multiple domains, organize content by domain to avoid loading irrelevant context. When a user asks about sales metrics, Claude only needs to read sales-related schemas, not finance or marketing data. This keeps token usage low and context focused.
For Skills with multiple domains, organize content by domain to avoid loading irrelevant context. When a user asks about sales metrics, the agent only needs to read sales-related schemas, not finance or marketing data. This keeps token usage low and context focused.
```
bigquery-skill/
@@ -348,13 +348,13 @@ For simple edits, modify the XML directly.
**For OOXML details**: See [OOXML.md](OOXML.md)
```
Claude reads REDLINING.md or OOXML.md only when the user needs those features.
Agents read REDLINING.md or OOXML.md only when the user needs those features.
### Avoid deeply nested references
Claude may partially read files when they're referenced from other referenced files. When encountering nested references, Claude might use commands like `head -100` to preview content rather than reading entire files, resulting in incomplete information.
Agents may partially read files when they're referenced from other referenced files. When encountering nested references, an agent might use commands like `head -100` to preview content rather than reading entire files, resulting in incomplete information.
**Keep references one level deep from SKILL.md**. All reference files should link directly from SKILL.md to ensure Claude reads complete files when needed.
**Keep references one level deep from SKILL.md**. All reference files should link directly from SKILL.md to ensure agents read complete files when needed.
**Bad example: Too deep**:
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ Here's the actual information...
### Structure longer reference files with table of contents
For reference files longer than 100 lines, include a table of contents at the top. This ensures Claude can see the full scope of available information even when previewing with partial reads.
For reference files longer than 100 lines, include a table of contents at the top. This ensures agents can see the full scope of available information even when previewing with partial reads.
**Example**:
@@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ For reference files longer than 100 lines, include a table of contents at the to
...
```
Claude can then read the complete file or jump to specific sections as needed.
Agents can then read the complete file or jump to specific sections as needed.
For details on how this filesystem-based architecture enables progressive disclosure, see the [Runtime environment](#runtime-environment) section in the Advanced section below.
@@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ For details on how this filesystem-based architecture enables progressive disclo
### Use workflows for complex tasks
Break complex operations into clear, sequential steps. For particularly complex workflows, provide a checklist that Claude can copy into its response and check off as it progresses.
Break complex operations into clear, sequential steps. For particularly complex workflows, provide a checklist that the agent can copy into its response and check off as it progresses.
**Example 1: Research synthesis workflow** (for Skills without code):
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ Run: `python scripts/verify_output.py output.pdf`
If verification fails, return to Step 2.
````
Clear steps prevent Claude from skipping critical validation. The checklist helps both Claude and you track progress through multi-step workflows.
Clear steps prevent agents from skipping critical validation. The checklist helps both you and the agent track progress through multi-step workflows.
### Implement feedback loops
@@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ This pattern greatly improves output quality.
5. Finalize and save the document
```
This shows the validation loop pattern using reference documents instead of scripts. The "validator" is STYLE\_GUIDE.md, and Claude performs the check by reading and comparing.
This shows the validation loop pattern using reference documents instead of scripts. The "validator" is STYLE\_GUIDE.md, and the agent performs the check by reading and comparing.
**Example 2: Document editing process** (for Skills with code):
@@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ Choose one term and use it throughout the Skill:
* Mix "field", "box", "element", "control"
* Mix "extract", "pull", "get", "retrieve"
Consistency helps Claude understand and follow instructions.
Consistency helps agents understand and follow instructions.
## Common patterns
@@ -688,11 +688,11 @@ chore: update dependencies and refactor error handling
Follow this style: type(scope): brief description, then detailed explanation.
````
Examples help Claude understand the desired style and level of detail more clearly than descriptions alone.
Examples help agents understand the desired style and level of detail more clearly than descriptions alone.
### Conditional workflow pattern
Guide Claude through decision points:
Guide agents through decision points:
```markdown theme={null}
## Document modification workflow
@@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ Guide Claude through decision points:
```
<Tip>
If workflows become large or complicated with many steps, consider pushing them into separate files and tell Claude to read the appropriate file based on the task at hand.
If workflows become large or complicated with many steps, consider pushing them into separate files and tell the agent to read the appropriate file based on the task at hand.
</Tip>
## Evaluation and iteration
@@ -726,9 +726,9 @@ Guide Claude through decision points:
**Evaluation-driven development:**
1. **Identify gaps**: Run Claude on representative tasks without a Skill. Document specific failures or missing context
1. **Identify gaps**: Run your agent on representative tasks without a Skill. Document specific failures or missing context
2. **Create evaluations**: Build three scenarios that test these gaps
3. **Establish baseline**: Measure Claude's performance without the Skill
3. **Establish baseline**: Measure the agent's performance without the Skill
4. **Write minimal instructions**: Create just enough content to address the gaps and pass evaluations
5. **Iterate**: Execute evaluations, compare against baseline, and refine
@@ -753,51 +753,51 @@ This approach ensures you're solving actual problems rather than anticipating re
This example demonstrates a data-driven evaluation with a simple testing rubric. We do not currently provide a built-in way to run these evaluations. Users can create their own evaluation system. Evaluations are your source of truth for measuring Skill effectiveness.
</Note>
### Develop Skills iteratively with Claude
### Develop Skills iteratively with the agent
The most effective Skill development process involves Claude itself. Work with one instance of Claude ("Claude A") to create a Skill that will be used by other instances ("Claude B"). Claude A helps you design and refine instructions, while Claude B tests them in real tasks. This works because Claude models understand both how to write effective agent instructions and what information agents need.
The most effective Skill development process involves the agent itself. Work with one instance ("Agent A") to create a Skill that will be used by other instances ("Agent B"). Agent A helps you design and refine instructions, while Agent B tests them in real tasks. This works because the underlying models understand both how to write effective agent instructions and what information agents need.
**Creating a new Skill:**
1. **Complete a task without a Skill**: Work through a problem with Claude A using normal prompting. As you work, you'll naturally provide context, explain preferences, and share procedural knowledge. Notice what information you repeatedly provide.
1. **Complete a task without a Skill**: Work through a problem with Agent A using normal prompting. As you work, you'll naturally provide context, explain preferences, and share procedural knowledge. Notice what information you repeatedly provide.
2. **Identify the reusable pattern**: After completing the task, identify what context you provided that would be useful for similar future tasks.
**Example**: If you worked through a BigQuery analysis, you might have provided table names, field definitions, filtering rules (like "always exclude test accounts"), and common query patterns.
3. **Ask Claude A to create a Skill**: "Create a Skill that captures this BigQuery analysis pattern we just used. Include the table schemas, naming conventions, and the rule about filtering test accounts."
3. **Ask Agent A to create a Skill**: "Create a Skill that captures this BigQuery analysis pattern we just used. Include the table schemas, naming conventions, and the rule about filtering test accounts."
<Tip>
Claude models understand the Skill format and structure natively. You don't need special system prompts or a "writing skills" skill to get Claude to help create Skills. Simply ask Claude to create a Skill and it will generate properly structured SKILL.md content with appropriate frontmatter and body content.
Modern agents understand the Skill format and structure natively. You don't need special system prompts or a "writing skills" skill to get help creating Skills. Simply ask the agent to create a Skill and it will generate properly structured SKILL.md content with appropriate frontmatter and body content.
</Tip>
4. **Review for conciseness**: Check that Claude A hasn't added unnecessary explanations. Ask: "Remove the explanation about what win rate means - Claude already knows that."
4. **Review for conciseness**: Check that Agent A hasn't added unnecessary explanations. Ask: "Remove the explanation about what win rate means - the agent already knows that."
5. **Improve information architecture**: Ask Claude A to organize the content more effectively. For example: "Organize this so the table schema is in a separate reference file. We might add more tables later."
5. **Improve information architecture**: Ask Agent A to organize the content more effectively. For example: "Organize this so the table schema is in a separate reference file. We might add more tables later."
6. **Test on similar tasks**: Use the Skill with Claude B (a fresh instance with the Skill loaded) on related use cases. Observe whether Claude B finds the right information, applies rules correctly, and handles the task successfully.
6. **Test on similar tasks**: Use the Skill with Agent B (a fresh instance with the Skill loaded) on related use cases. Observe whether Agent B finds the right information, applies rules correctly, and handles the task successfully.
7. **Iterate based on observation**: If Claude B struggles or misses something, return to Claude A with specifics: "When Claude used this Skill, it forgot to filter by date for Q4. Should we add a section about date filtering patterns?"
7. **Iterate based on observation**: If Agent B struggles or misses something, return to Agent A with specifics: "When the agent used this Skill, it forgot to filter by date for Q4. Should we add a section about date filtering patterns?"
**Iterating on existing Skills:**
The same hierarchical pattern continues when improving Skills. You alternate between:
* **Working with Claude A** (the expert who helps refine the Skill)
* **Testing with Claude B** (the agent using the Skill to perform real work)
* **Observing Claude B's behavior** and bringing insights back to Claude A
* **Working with Agent A** (the expert who helps refine the Skill)
* **Testing with Agent B** (the agent using the Skill to perform real work)
* **Observing Agent B's behavior** and bringing insights back to Agent A
1. **Use the Skill in real workflows**: Give Claude B (with the Skill loaded) actual tasks, not test scenarios
1. **Use the Skill in real workflows**: Give Agent B (with the Skill loaded) actual tasks, not test scenarios
2. **Observe Claude B's behavior**: Note where it struggles, succeeds, or makes unexpected choices
2. **Observe Agent B's behavior**: Note where it struggles, succeeds, or makes unexpected choices
**Example observation**: "When I asked Claude B for a regional sales report, it wrote the query but forgot to filter out test accounts, even though the Skill mentions this rule."
**Example observation**: "When I asked Agent B for a regional sales report, it wrote the query but forgot to filter out test accounts, even though the Skill mentions this rule."
3. **Return to Claude A for improvements**: Share the current SKILL.md and describe what you observed. Ask: "I noticed Claude B forgot to filter test accounts when I asked for a regional report. The Skill mentions filtering, but maybe it's not prominent enough?"
3. **Return to Agent A for improvements**: Share the current SKILL.md and describe what you observed. Ask: "I noticed Agent B forgot to filter test accounts when I asked for a regional report. The Skill mentions filtering, but maybe it's not prominent enough?"
4. **Review Claude A's suggestions**: Claude A might suggest reorganizing to make rules more prominent, using stronger language like "MUST filter" instead of "always filter", or restructuring the workflow section.
4. **Review Agent A's suggestions**: Agent A might suggest reorganizing to make rules more prominent, using stronger language like "MUST filter" instead of "always filter", or restructuring the workflow section.
5. **Apply and test changes**: Update the Skill with Claude A's refinements, then test again with Claude B on similar requests
5. **Apply and test changes**: Update the Skill with Agent A's refinements, then test again with Agent B on similar requests
6. **Repeat based on usage**: Continue this observe-refine-test cycle as you encounter new scenarios. Each iteration improves the Skill based on real agent behavior, not assumptions.
@@ -807,18 +807,18 @@ The same hierarchical pattern continues when improving Skills. You alternate bet
2. Ask: Does the Skill activate when expected? Are instructions clear? What's missing?
3. Incorporate feedback to address blind spots in your own usage patterns
**Why this approach works**: Claude A understands agent needs, you provide domain expertise, Claude B reveals gaps through real usage, and iterative refinement improves Skills based on observed behavior rather than assumptions.
**Why this approach works**: Agent A understands agent needs, you provide domain expertise, Agent B reveals gaps through real usage, and iterative refinement improves Skills based on observed behavior rather than assumptions.
### Observe how Claude navigates Skills
### Observe how agents navigate Skills
As you iterate on Skills, pay attention to how Claude actually uses them in practice. Watch for:
As you iterate on Skills, pay attention to how agents actually use them in practice. Watch for:
* **Unexpected exploration paths**: Does Claude read files in an order you didn't anticipate? This might indicate your structure isn't as intuitive as you thought
* **Missed connections**: Does Claude fail to follow references to important files? Your links might need to be more explicit or prominent
* **Overreliance on certain sections**: If Claude repeatedly reads the same file, consider whether that content should be in the main SKILL.md instead
* **Ignored content**: If Claude never accesses a bundled file, it might be unnecessary or poorly signaled in the main instructions
* **Unexpected exploration paths**: Does the agent read files in an order you didn't anticipate? This might indicate your structure isn't as intuitive as you thought
* **Missed connections**: Does the agent fail to follow references to important files? Your links might need to be more explicit or prominent
* **Overreliance on certain sections**: If the agent repeatedly reads the same file, consider whether that content should be in the main SKILL.md instead
* **Ignored content**: If the agent never accesses a bundled file, it might be unnecessary or poorly signaled in the main instructions
Iterate based on these observations rather than assumptions. The 'name' and 'description' in your Skill's metadata are particularly critical. Claude uses these when deciding whether to trigger the Skill in response to the current task. Make sure they clearly describe what the Skill does and when it should be used.
Iterate based on these observations rather than assumptions. The 'name' and 'description' in your Skill's metadata are particularly critical. Agents use these when deciding whether to trigger the Skill in response to the current task. Make sure they clearly describe what the Skill does and when it should be used.
## Anti-patterns to avoid
@@ -854,7 +854,7 @@ The sections below focus on Skills that include executable scripts. If your Skil
### Solve, don't punt
When writing scripts for Skills, handle error conditions rather than punting to Claude.
When writing scripts for Skills, handle error conditions rather than punting to the agent.
**Good example: Handle errors explicitly**:
@@ -876,15 +876,15 @@ def process_file(path):
return ''
```
**Bad example: Punt to Claude**:
**Bad example: Punt to the agent**:
```python theme={null}
def process_file(path):
# Just fail and let Claude figure it out
# Just fail and let the agent figure it out
return open(path).read()
```
Configuration parameters should also be justified and documented to avoid "voodoo constants" (Ousterhout's law). If you don't know the right value, how will Claude determine it?
Configuration parameters should also be justified and documented to avoid "voodoo constants" (Ousterhout's law). If you don't know the right value, how will the agent determine it?
**Good example: Self-documenting**:
@@ -907,7 +907,7 @@ RETRIES = 5 # Why 5?
### Provide utility scripts
Even if Claude could write a script, pre-made scripts offer advantages:
Even if your agent could write a script, pre-made scripts offer advantages:
**Benefits of utility scripts**:
@@ -918,9 +918,9 @@ Even if Claude could write a script, pre-made scripts offer advantages:
<img src="https://mintcdn.com/anthropic-claude-docs/4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00/images/agent-skills-executable-scripts.png?fit=max&auto=format&n=4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00&q=85&s=4bbc45f2c2e0bee9f2f0d5da669bad00" alt="Bundling executable scripts alongside instruction files" data-og-width="2048" width="2048" data-og-height="1154" height="1154" data-path="images/agent-skills-executable-scripts.png" data-optimize="true" data-opv="3" srcset="https://mintcdn.com/anthropic-claude-docs/4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00/images/agent-skills-executable-scripts.png?w=280&fit=max&auto=format&n=4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00&q=85&s=9a04e6535a8467bfeea492e517de389f 280w, https://mintcdn.com/anthropic-claude-docs/4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00/images/agent-skills-executable-scripts.png?w=560&fit=max&auto=format&n=4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00&q=85&s=e49333ad90141af17c0d7651cca7216b 560w, https://mintcdn.com/anthropic-claude-docs/4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00/images/agent-skills-executable-scripts.png?w=840&fit=max&auto=format&n=4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00&q=85&s=954265a5df52223d6572b6214168c428 840w, https://mintcdn.com/anthropic-claude-docs/4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00/images/agent-skills-executable-scripts.png?w=1100&fit=max&auto=format&n=4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00&q=85&s=2ff7a2d8f2a83ee8af132b29f10150fd 1100w, https://mintcdn.com/anthropic-claude-docs/4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00/images/agent-skills-executable-scripts.png?w=1650&fit=max&auto=format&n=4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00&q=85&s=48ab96245e04077f4d15e9170e081cfb 1650w, https://mintcdn.com/anthropic-claude-docs/4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00/images/agent-skills-executable-scripts.png?w=2500&fit=max&auto=format&n=4Bny2bjzuGBK7o00&q=85&s=0301a6c8b3ee879497cc5b5483177c90 2500w" />
The diagram above shows how executable scripts work alongside instruction files. The instruction file (forms.md) references the script, and Claude can execute it without loading its contents into context.
The diagram above shows how executable scripts work alongside instruction files. The instruction file (forms.md) references the script, and the agent can execute it without loading its contents into context.
**Important distinction**: Make clear in your instructions whether Claude should:
**Important distinction**: Make clear in your instructions whether the agent should:
* **Execute the script** (most common): "Run `analyze_form.py` to extract fields"
* **Read it as reference** (for complex logic): "See `analyze_form.py` for the field extraction algorithm"
@@ -962,7 +962,7 @@ python scripts/fill_form.py input.pdf fields.json output.pdf
### Use visual analysis
When inputs can be rendered as images, have Claude analyze them:
When inputs can be rendered as images, have the agent analyze them:
````markdown theme={null}
## Form layout analysis
@@ -973,20 +973,20 @@ When inputs can be rendered as images, have Claude analyze them:
```
2. Analyze each page image to identify form fields
3. Claude can see field locations and types visually
3. The agent can see field locations and types visually
````
<Note>
In this example, you'd need to write the `pdf_to_images.py` script.
</Note>
Claude's vision capabilities help understand layouts and structures.
Agent vision capabilities help understand layouts and structures.
### Create verifiable intermediate outputs
When Claude performs complex, open-ended tasks, it can make mistakes. The "plan-validate-execute" pattern catches errors early by having Claude first create a plan in a structured format, then validate that plan with a script before executing it.
When agents perform complex, open-ended tasks, they can make mistakes. The "plan-validate-execute" pattern catches errors early by having the agent first create a plan in a structured format, then validate that plan with a script before executing it.
**Example**: Imagine asking Claude to update 50 form fields in a PDF based on a spreadsheet. Without validation, Claude might reference non-existent fields, create conflicting values, miss required fields, or apply updates incorrectly.
**Example**: Imagine asking the agent to update 50 form fields in a PDF based on a spreadsheet. Without validation, it might reference non-existent fields, create conflicting values, miss required fields, or apply updates incorrectly.
**Solution**: Use the workflow pattern shown above (PDF form filling), but add an intermediate `changes.json` file that gets validated before applying changes. The workflow becomes: analyze → **create plan file** → **validate plan** → execute → verify.
@@ -994,12 +994,12 @@ When Claude performs complex, open-ended tasks, it can make mistakes. The "plan-
* **Catches errors early**: Validation finds problems before changes are applied
* **Machine-verifiable**: Scripts provide objective verification
* **Reversible planning**: Claude can iterate on the plan without touching originals
* **Reversible planning**: The agent can iterate on the plan without touching originals
* **Clear debugging**: Error messages point to specific problems
**When to use**: Batch operations, destructive changes, complex validation rules, high-stakes operations.
**Implementation tip**: Make validation scripts verbose with specific error messages like "Field 'signature\_date' not found. Available fields: customer\_name, order\_total, signature\_date\_signed" to help Claude fix issues.
**Implementation tip**: Make validation scripts verbose with specific error messages like "Field 'signature\_date' not found. Available fields: customer\_name, order\_total, signature\_date\_signed" to help the agent fix issues.
### Package dependencies
@@ -1008,32 +1008,32 @@ Skills run in the code execution environment with platform-specific limitations:
* **claude.ai**: Can install packages from npm and PyPI and pull from GitHub repositories
* **Anthropic API**: Has no network access and no runtime package installation
List required packages in your SKILL.md and verify they're available in the [code execution tool documentation](/en/docs/agents-and-tools/tool-use/code-execution-tool).
List required packages in your SKILL.md and verify they're available in the [code execution tool documentation](https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/agents-and-tools/tool-use/code-execution-tool).
### Runtime environment
Skills run in a code execution environment with filesystem access, bash commands, and code execution capabilities. For the conceptual explanation of this architecture, see [The Skills architecture](/en/docs/agents-and-tools/agent-skills/overview#the-skills-architecture) in the overview.
Skills run in a code execution environment with filesystem access, bash commands, and code execution capabilities. For the conceptual explanation of this architecture, see [The Skills architecture](https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/agents-and-tools/agent-skills/overview#the-skills-architecture) in the overview.
**How this affects your authoring:**
**How Claude accesses Skills:**
**How agents access Skills:**
1. **Metadata pre-loaded**: At startup, the name and description from all Skills' YAML frontmatter are loaded into the system prompt
2. **Files read on-demand**: Claude uses bash Read tools to access SKILL.md and other files from the filesystem when needed
2. **Files read on-demand**: Agents use their file-reading tools to access SKILL.md and other files from the filesystem when needed
3. **Scripts executed efficiently**: Utility scripts can be executed via bash without loading their full contents into context. Only the script's output consumes tokens
4. **No context penalty for large files**: Reference files, data, or documentation don't consume context tokens until actually read
* **File paths matter**: Claude navigates your skill directory like a filesystem. Use forward slashes (`reference/guide.md`), not backslashes
* **File paths matter**: Agents navigate your skill directory like a filesystem. Use forward slashes (`reference/guide.md`), not backslashes
* **Name files descriptively**: Use names that indicate content: `form_validation_rules.md`, not `doc2.md`
* **Organize for discovery**: Structure directories by domain or feature
* Good: `reference/finance.md`, `reference/sales.md`
* Bad: `docs/file1.md`, `docs/file2.md`
* **Bundle comprehensive resources**: Include complete API docs, extensive examples, large datasets; no context penalty until accessed
* **Prefer scripts for deterministic operations**: Write `validate_form.py` rather than asking Claude to generate validation code
* **Prefer scripts for deterministic operations**: Write `validate_form.py` rather than asking the agent to generate validation code
* **Make execution intent clear**:
* "Run `analyze_form.py` to extract fields" (execute)
* "See `analyze_form.py` for the extraction algorithm" (read as reference)
* **Test file access patterns**: Verify Claude can navigate your directory structure by testing with real requests
* **Test file access patterns**: Verify the agent can navigate your directory structure by testing with real requests
**Example:**
@@ -1046,9 +1046,9 @@ bigquery-skill/
└── product.md (usage analytics)
```
When the user asks about revenue, Claude reads SKILL.md, sees the reference to `reference/finance.md`, and invokes bash to read just that file. The sales.md and product.md files remain on the filesystem, consuming zero context tokens until needed. This filesystem-based model is what enables progressive disclosure. Claude can navigate and selectively load exactly what each task requires.
When the user asks about revenue, the agent reads SKILL.md, sees the reference to `reference/finance.md`, and invokes bash to read just that file. The sales.md and product.md files remain on the filesystem, consuming zero context tokens until needed. This filesystem-based model is what enables progressive disclosure. Agents can navigate and selectively load exactly what each task requires.
For complete details on the technical architecture, see [How Skills work](/en/docs/agents-and-tools/agent-skills/overview#how-skills-work) in the Skills overview.
For complete details on the technical architecture, see [How Skills work](https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/agents-and-tools/agent-skills/overview#how-skills-work) in the Skills overview.
### MCP tool references
@@ -1068,7 +1068,7 @@ Where:
* `BigQuery` and `GitHub` are MCP server names
* `bigquery_schema` and `create_issue` are the tool names within those servers
Without the server prefix, Claude may fail to locate the tool, especially when multiple MCP servers are available.
Without the server prefix, agents may fail to locate the tool, especially when multiple MCP servers are available.
### Avoid assuming tools are installed
@@ -1092,11 +1092,11 @@ reader = PdfReader("file.pdf")
### YAML frontmatter requirements
The SKILL.md frontmatter requires `name` (64 characters max) and `description` (1024 characters max) fields. See the [Skills overview](/en/docs/agents-and-tools/agent-skills/overview#skill-structure) for complete structure details.
The SKILL.md frontmatter requires `name` (64 characters max) and `description` (1024 characters max) fields. See the [Skills overview](https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/agents-and-tools/agent-skills/overview#skill-structure) for complete structure details.
### Token budgets
Keep SKILL.md body under 500 lines for optimal performance. If your content exceeds this, split it into separate files using the progressive disclosure patterns described earlier. For architectural details, see the [Skills overview](/en/docs/agents-and-tools/agent-skills/overview#how-skills-work).
Keep SKILL.md body under 500 lines for optimal performance. If your content exceeds this, split it into separate files using the progressive disclosure patterns described earlier. For architectural details, see the [Skills overview](https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/agents-and-tools/agent-skills/overview#how-skills-work).
## Checklist for effective Skills
@@ -1117,7 +1117,7 @@ Before sharing a Skill, verify:
### Code and scripts
* [ ] Scripts solve problems rather than punt to Claude
* [ ] Scripts solve problems rather than punt to the agent
* [ ] Error handling is explicit and helpful
* [ ] No "voodoo constants" (all values justified)
* [ ] Required packages listed in instructions and verified as available
@@ -1136,15 +1136,15 @@ Before sharing a Skill, verify:
## Next steps
<CardGroup cols={2}>
<Card title="Get started with Agent Skills" icon="rocket" href="/en/docs/agents-and-tools/agent-skills/quickstart">
<Card title="Get started with Agent Skills" icon="rocket" href="https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/agents-and-tools/agent-skills/quickstart">
Create your first Skill
</Card>
<Card title="Use Skills in Claude Code" icon="terminal" href="/en/docs/claude-code/skills">
<Card title="Use Skills in Claude Code" icon="terminal" href="https://code.claude.com/docs/en/skills">
Create and manage Skills in Claude Code
</Card>
<Card title="Use Skills with the API" icon="code" href="/en/api/skills-guide">
<Card title="Use Skills with the API" icon="code" href="https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/skills-guide">
Upload and use Skills programmatically
</Card>
</CardGroup>

View File

@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ LLMs respond to the same persuasion principles as humans. Understanding this psy
**How it works in skills:**
- Require announcements: "Announce skill usage"
- Force explicit choices: "Choose A, B, or C"
- Use tracking: TodoWrite for checklists
- Use tracking: todos for checklists
**When to use:**
- Ensuring skills are actually followed
@@ -80,8 +80,8 @@ LLMs respond to the same persuasion principles as humans. Understanding this psy
**Example:**
```markdown
✅ Checklists without TodoWrite tracking = steps get skipped. Every time.
❌ Some people find TodoWrite helpful for checklists.
✅ Checklists without todo tracking = steps get skipped. Every time.
❌ Some people find a todo list helpful for checklists.
```
### 5. Unity

16
tests/antigravity/run-tests.sh Executable file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Run all Antigravity (agy) integration tests.
set -euo pipefail
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
echo "=== Antigravity integration tests ==="
for t in "$SCRIPT_DIR"/test-*.sh; do
echo
echo ">>> $t"
bash "$t"
done
echo
echo "=== All Antigravity tests passed ==="

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Validate the Antigravity (agy) integration. agy installs the existing plugin
# directly (`agy plugin install <repo-url>`): it loads the bundled skills and
# runs the SessionStart hook for bootstrap, so there is no agy-specific scaffold
# to test. What IS agy-specific is the tool mapping — agy has no `Skill` tool and
# loads skills by reading SKILL.md with view_file — and SKILL.md pointing at it.
#
# Mirrors tests/pi/test-pi-extension.mjs's "tools reference documents
# harness-specific mappings" check. CI-safe: does not require `agy` installed.
set -euo pipefail
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
REPO_ROOT="$(cd "$SCRIPT_DIR/../.." && pwd)"
MAPPING="$REPO_ROOT/skills/using-superpowers/references/antigravity-tools.md"
SKILL="$REPO_ROOT/skills/using-superpowers/SKILL.md"
fail() { echo "FAIL: $*" >&2; exit 1; }
echo "test-antigravity-tools: checking Antigravity tool mapping"
# --- Mapping exists ---------------------------------------------------------
[ -f "$MAPPING" ] || fail "tool mapping missing at $MAPPING"
# --- Skill-load mechanism: view_file on SKILL.md (IsSkillFile), no Skill tool -
grep -qiE "view_file" "$MAPPING" \
|| fail "mapping does not document view_file as the file/skill-read tool"
grep -qiE "SKILL\.md" "$MAPPING" \
|| fail "mapping does not document reading SKILL.md as the skill-load path"
grep -q "IsSkillFile" "$MAPPING" \
|| fail "mapping does not document setting IsSkillFile when loading a skill"
# --- Core action→tool mappings are documented -------------------------------
for tool in write_to_file replace_file_content run_command grep_search invoke_subagent; do
grep -q "$tool" "$MAPPING" \
|| fail "mapping does not document the '$tool' tool"
done
# --- Subagents use the built-in self/research types -------------------------
grep -q '`self`' "$MAPPING" \
|| fail "mapping does not document the built-in 'self' subagent type"
grep -q '`research`' "$MAPPING" \
|| fail "mapping does not document the built-in 'research' subagent type"
# --- Task tracking documents the 'task' artifact mechanism ------------------
grep -qE 'ArtifactType.*task|task. artifact' "$MAPPING" \
|| fail "mapping does not document task tracking as a 'task' artifact"
# --- SKILL.md Platform Adaptation links the mapping -------------------------
grep -q "antigravity-tools.md" "$SKILL" \
|| fail "SKILL.md Platform Adaptation does not reference antigravity-tools.md"
echo "PASS: Antigravity tool mapping valid (view_file skill-load, agy tools, SKILL.md link)"

View File

@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ async function runTests() {
assert(template.includes('indicator-bar'), 'Should have indicator bar');
assert(template.includes('indicator-text'), 'Should have indicator text');
assert(template.includes('<!-- CONTENT -->'), 'Should have content placeholder');
assert(template.includes('claude-content'), 'Should have content container');
assert(template.includes('frame-content'), 'Should have content container');
return Promise.resolve();
});

View File

@@ -1,9 +1,11 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Windows lifecycle tests for the brainstorm server.
#
# Verifies that the brainstorm server survives the 60-second lifecycle
# check on Windows, where OWNER_PID monitoring is disabled because the
# MSYS2 PID namespace is invisible to Node.js.
# Verifies brainstorm server lifecycle behavior, including:
# - Windows/MSYS2 foreground mode and empty OWNER_PID handling
# - Server survival past the 60-second lifecycle check window
# - Dead-at-startup OWNER_PID validation (logged, monitoring disabled)
# - Clean stop-server.sh shutdown
#
# Requirements:
# - Node.js in PATH
@@ -20,7 +22,7 @@ SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
REPO_ROOT="${SUPERPOWERS_ROOT:-$(cd "$SCRIPT_DIR/../.." && pwd)}"
START_SCRIPT="$REPO_ROOT/skills/brainstorming/scripts/start-server.sh"
STOP_SCRIPT="$REPO_ROOT/skills/brainstorming/scripts/stop-server.sh"
SERVER_JS="$REPO_ROOT/skills/brainstorming/scripts/server.js"
SERVER_SCRIPT="$REPO_ROOT/skills/brainstorming/scripts/server.cjs"
TEST_DIR="${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/brainstorm-win-test-$$"
@@ -64,7 +66,7 @@ skip() {
wait_for_server_info() {
local dir="$1"
for _ in $(seq 1 50); do
if [[ -f "$dir/.server-info" ]]; then
if [[ -f "$dir/state/server-info" ]]; then
return 0
fi
sleep 0.1
@@ -73,9 +75,9 @@ wait_for_server_info() {
}
get_port_from_info() {
# Read the port from .server-info. Use grep/sed instead of Node.js
# Read the port from state/server-info. Use grep/sed instead of Node.js
# to avoid MSYS2-to-Windows path translation issues.
grep -o '"port":[0-9]*' "$1/.server-info" | head -1 | sed 's/"port"://'
grep -o '"port":[0-9]*' "$1/state/server-info" | head -1 | sed 's/"port"://'
}
http_check() {
@@ -214,11 +216,11 @@ BRAINSTORM_HOST="127.0.0.1" \
BRAINSTORM_URL_HOST="localhost" \
BRAINSTORM_OWNER_PID="" \
BRAINSTORM_PORT=$((49152 + RANDOM % 16383)) \
node "$SERVER_JS" > "$TEST_DIR/survival/.server.log" 2>&1 &
node "$SERVER_SCRIPT" > "$TEST_DIR/survival/.server.log" 2>&1 &
SERVER_PID=$!
if ! wait_for_server_info "$TEST_DIR/survival"; then
fail "Server starts successfully" "Server did not write .server-info within 5 seconds"
fail "Server starts successfully" "Server did not write state/server-info within 5 seconds"
kill "$SERVER_PID" 2>/dev/null || true
SERVER_PID=""
else
@@ -254,10 +256,15 @@ else
SERVER_PID=""
fi
# ========== Test 5: Bad OWNER_PID causes shutdown (control) ==========
# ========== Test 5: Dead-at-startup OWNER_PID is logged but does not kill the server ==========
#
# The server validates BRAINSTORM_OWNER_PID at startup. If it's already dead,
# the PID resolution was wrong (common on WSL, Tailscale SSH, cross-user
# scenarios). The server logs 'owner-pid-invalid', disables owner monitoring,
# and continues running. The idle timeout becomes the only shutdown trigger.
echo ""
echo "--- Control: Bad OWNER_PID causes shutdown ---"
echo "--- Dead-at-startup OWNER_PID: server survives, logs owner-pid-invalid ---"
mkdir -p "$TEST_DIR/control"
@@ -272,33 +279,41 @@ BRAINSTORM_HOST="127.0.0.1" \
BRAINSTORM_URL_HOST="localhost" \
BRAINSTORM_OWNER_PID="$BAD_PID" \
BRAINSTORM_PORT=$((49152 + RANDOM % 16383)) \
node "$SERVER_JS" > "$TEST_DIR/control/.server.log" 2>&1 &
node "$SERVER_SCRIPT" > "$TEST_DIR/control/.server.log" 2>&1 &
CONTROL_PID=$!
if ! wait_for_server_info "$TEST_DIR/control"; then
fail "Control server starts" "Server did not write .server-info within 5 seconds"
fail "Control server starts" "Server did not write state/server-info within 5 seconds"
kill "$CONTROL_PID" 2>/dev/null || true
CONTROL_PID=""
else
pass "Control server starts with bad OWNER_PID=$BAD_PID"
pass "Control server starts with dead-at-startup OWNER_PID=$BAD_PID"
echo " Waiting ~75s for lifecycle check to kill server..."
echo " Waiting ~75s to verify server survives past lifecycle check..."
sleep 75
if kill -0 "$CONTROL_PID" 2>/dev/null; then
fail "Control server self-terminates with bad OWNER_PID" \
"Server is still alive (expected it to die)"
kill "$CONTROL_PID" 2>/dev/null || true
pass "Server survives with dead-at-startup OWNER_PID (owner monitoring disabled)"
else
pass "Control server self-terminates with bad OWNER_PID"
fail "Server survives with dead-at-startup OWNER_PID" \
"Server died unexpectedly. Log tail: $(tail -5 "$TEST_DIR/control/.server.log" 2>/dev/null)"
fi
if grep -q "owner-pid-invalid" "$TEST_DIR/control/.server.log" 2>/dev/null; then
pass "Server logs 'owner-pid-invalid' for dead-at-startup PID"
else
fail "Server logs 'owner-pid-invalid' for dead-at-startup PID" \
"Log tail: $(tail -5 "$TEST_DIR/control/.server.log" 2>/dev/null)"
fi
if grep -q "owner process exited" "$TEST_DIR/control/.server.log" 2>/dev/null; then
pass "Control server logs 'owner process exited'"
fail "No spurious 'owner process exited' log" \
"Found 'owner process exited' but owner monitoring should be disabled"
else
fail "Control server logs 'owner process exited'" \
"Log tail: $(tail -5 "$TEST_DIR/control/.server.log" 2>/dev/null)"
pass "No spurious 'owner process exited' log"
fi
kill "$CONTROL_PID" 2>/dev/null || true
fi
wait "$CONTROL_PID" 2>/dev/null || true
@@ -309,16 +324,16 @@ CONTROL_PID=""
echo ""
echo "--- Clean Shutdown ---"
mkdir -p "$TEST_DIR/stop-test"
mkdir -p "$TEST_DIR/stop-test/state"
BRAINSTORM_DIR="$TEST_DIR/stop-test" \
BRAINSTORM_HOST="127.0.0.1" \
BRAINSTORM_URL_HOST="localhost" \
BRAINSTORM_OWNER_PID="" \
BRAINSTORM_PORT=$((49152 + RANDOM % 16383)) \
node "$SERVER_JS" > "$TEST_DIR/stop-test/.server.log" 2>&1 &
node "$SERVER_SCRIPT" > "$TEST_DIR/stop-test/.server.log" 2>&1 &
STOP_TEST_PID=$!
echo "$STOP_TEST_PID" > "$TEST_DIR/stop-test/.server.pid"
echo "$STOP_TEST_PID" > "$TEST_DIR/stop-test/state/server.pid"
if ! wait_for_server_info "$TEST_DIR/stop-test"; then
fail "Stop-test server starts" "Server did not start"

View File

@@ -115,6 +115,13 @@ Full workflow execution test (~10-30 minutes):
- Subagents follow the skill correctly
- Final code is functional and tested
#### test-worktree-native-preference.sh
RED-GREEN-REFACTOR validation for the using-git-worktrees skill (~5 minutes):
- RED: skill without Step 1a — agent should use `git worktree add`
- GREEN: skill with Step 1a — agent should use the native EnterWorktree tool
- PRESSURE: same as GREEN under urgency framing with pre-existing `.worktrees/`
- Drill scenario `worktree-creation-under-pressure.yaml` covers the PRESSURE phase only
## Adding New Tests
1. Create new test file: `test-<skill-name>.sh`

View File

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ fi
# Parse command line arguments
VERBOSE=false
SPECIFIC_TEST=""
TIMEOUT=300 # Default 5 minute timeout per test
TIMEOUT=600 # Default 10 minute timeout per test
RUN_INTEGRATION=false
while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]; do
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ done
# List of skill tests to run (fast unit tests)
tests=(
"test-worktree-path-policy.sh"
"test-subagent-driven-development.sh"
)

View File

@@ -1,177 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Integration Test: Document Review System
# Actually runs spec/plan review and verifies reviewers catch issues
set -euo pipefail
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
source "$SCRIPT_DIR/test-helpers.sh"
echo "========================================"
echo " Integration Test: Document Review System"
echo "========================================"
echo ""
echo "This test verifies the document review system by:"
echo " 1. Creating a spec with intentional errors"
echo " 2. Running the spec document reviewer"
echo " 3. Verifying the reviewer catches the errors"
echo ""
# Create test project
TEST_PROJECT=$(create_test_project)
echo "Test project: $TEST_PROJECT"
# Trap to cleanup
trap "cleanup_test_project $TEST_PROJECT" EXIT
cd "$TEST_PROJECT"
# Create directory structure
mkdir -p docs/superpowers/specs
# Create a spec document WITH INTENTIONAL ERRORS for the reviewer to catch
cat > docs/superpowers/specs/test-feature-design.md <<'EOF'
# Test Feature Design
## Overview
This is a test feature that does something useful.
## Requirements
1. The feature should work correctly
2. It should be fast
3. TODO: Add more requirements here
## Architecture
The feature will use a simple architecture with:
- A frontend component
- A backend service
- Error handling will be specified later once we understand the failure modes better
## Data Flow
Data flows from the frontend to the backend.
## Testing Strategy
Tests will be written to cover the main functionality.
EOF
# Initialize git repo
git init --quiet
git config user.email "test@test.com"
git config user.name "Test User"
git add .
git commit -m "Initial commit with test spec" --quiet
echo ""
echo "Created test spec with intentional errors:"
echo " - TODO placeholder in Requirements section"
echo " - 'specified later' deferral in Architecture section"
echo ""
echo "Running spec document reviewer..."
echo ""
# Run Claude to review the spec
OUTPUT_FILE="$TEST_PROJECT/claude-output.txt"
PROMPT="You are testing the spec document reviewer.
Read the spec-document-reviewer-prompt.md template in skills/brainstorming/ to understand the review format.
Then review the spec at $TEST_PROJECT/docs/superpowers/specs/test-feature-design.md using the criteria from that template.
Look for:
- TODOs, placeholders, 'TBD', incomplete sections
- Sections saying 'to be defined later' or 'will spec when X is done'
- Sections noticeably less detailed than others
Output your review in the format specified in the template."
echo "================================================================================"
cd "$SCRIPT_DIR/../.." && timeout 120 claude -p "$PROMPT" --permission-mode bypassPermissions 2>&1 | tee "$OUTPUT_FILE" || {
echo ""
echo "================================================================================"
echo "EXECUTION FAILED (exit code: $?)"
exit 1
}
echo "================================================================================"
echo ""
echo "Analyzing reviewer output..."
echo ""
# Verification tests
FAILED=0
echo "=== Verification Tests ==="
echo ""
# Test 1: Reviewer found the TODO
echo "Test 1: Reviewer found TODO..."
if grep -qi "TODO" "$OUTPUT_FILE" && grep -qi "requirements\|Requirements" "$OUTPUT_FILE"; then
echo " [PASS] Reviewer identified TODO in Requirements section"
else
echo " [FAIL] Reviewer did not identify TODO"
FAILED=$((FAILED + 1))
fi
echo ""
# Test 2: Reviewer found the "specified later" deferral
echo "Test 2: Reviewer found 'specified later' deferral..."
if grep -qi "specified later\|later\|defer\|incomplete\|error handling" "$OUTPUT_FILE"; then
echo " [PASS] Reviewer identified deferred content"
else
echo " [FAIL] Reviewer did not identify deferred content"
FAILED=$((FAILED + 1))
fi
echo ""
# Test 3: Reviewer output includes Issues section
echo "Test 3: Review output format..."
if grep -qi "issues\|Issues" "$OUTPUT_FILE"; then
echo " [PASS] Review includes Issues section"
else
echo " [FAIL] Review missing Issues section"
FAILED=$((FAILED + 1))
fi
echo ""
# Test 4: Reviewer did NOT approve (found issues)
echo "Test 4: Reviewer verdict..."
if grep -qi "Issues Found\|❌\|not approved\|issues found" "$OUTPUT_FILE"; then
echo " [PASS] Reviewer correctly found issues (not approved)"
elif grep -qi "Approved\|✅" "$OUTPUT_FILE" && ! grep -qi "Issues Found\|❌" "$OUTPUT_FILE"; then
echo " [FAIL] Reviewer incorrectly approved spec with errors"
FAILED=$((FAILED + 1))
else
echo " [PASS] Reviewer identified problems (ambiguous format but found issues)"
fi
echo ""
# Summary
echo "========================================"
echo " Test Summary"
echo "========================================"
echo ""
if [ $FAILED -eq 0 ]; then
echo "STATUS: PASSED"
echo "All verification tests passed!"
echo ""
echo "The spec document reviewer correctly:"
echo " ✓ Found TODO placeholder"
echo " ✓ Found 'specified later' deferral"
echo " ✓ Produced properly formatted review"
echo " ✓ Did not approve spec with errors"
exit 0
else
echo "STATUS: FAILED"
echo "Failed $FAILED verification tests"
echo ""
echo "Output saved to: $OUTPUT_FILE"
echo ""
echo "Review the output to see what went wrong."
exit 1
fi

View File

@@ -9,14 +9,14 @@ run_claude() {
local allowed_tools="${3:-}"
local output_file=$(mktemp)
# Build command
local cmd="claude -p \"$prompt\""
# Build command as an argv array so timeout wraps claude directly.
local cmd=(claude -p "$prompt")
if [ -n "$allowed_tools" ]; then
cmd="$cmd --allowed-tools=$allowed_tools"
cmd+=(--allowed-tools="$allowed_tools")
fi
# Run Claude in headless mode with timeout
if timeout "$timeout" bash -c "$cmd" > "$output_file" 2>&1; then
if timeout "$timeout" "${cmd[@]}" > "$output_file" 2>&1; then
cat "$output_file"
rm -f "$output_file"
return 0

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,17 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Integration Test: subagent-driven-development workflow
# Actually executes a plan and verifies the new workflow behaviors
#
# Drill coverage: evals/scenarios/sdd-rejects-extra-features.yaml covers the
# YAGNI enforcement subset (forbidden exports + reviewer-as-gate semantics)
# and is stricter on that axis. This bash test additionally asserts:
# - >=3 git commits (initial + per-task commits, exercising SDD's
# commit-per-task workflow shape)
# - >=2 Claude Code subagent dispatches via Agent or Task (drill only asserts >=1)
# - Claude Code task-tracking tool usage (drill makes no assertion)
# - test/math.test.js exists (drill relies on `npm test` succeeding)
# - analyze-token-usage.py token-budget telemetry
# Kept until those assertions are added to drill or explicitly retired.
set -euo pipefail
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
@@ -135,8 +146,7 @@ EOF
# Note: We use a longer timeout since this is integration testing
# Use --allowed-tools to enable tool usage in headless mode
# IMPORTANT: Run from superpowers directory so local dev skills are available
PROMPT="Change to directory $TEST_PROJECT and then execute the implementation plan at docs/superpowers/plans/implementation-plan.md using the subagent-driven-development skill.
PROMPT="Execute the implementation plan at docs/superpowers/plans/implementation-plan.md using the subagent-driven-development skill.
IMPORTANT: Follow the skill exactly. I will be verifying that you:
1. Read the plan once at the beginning
@@ -147,9 +157,14 @@ IMPORTANT: Follow the skill exactly. I will be verifying that you:
Begin now. Execute the plan."
echo "Running Claude (output will be shown below and saved to $OUTPUT_FILE)..."
PLUGIN_DIR=$(cd "$SCRIPT_DIR/../.." && pwd)
# Run claude from inside the test project so its session JSONL lands in a
# project-specific directory under ~/.claude/projects/, isolated from any
# other concurrent claude sessions.
echo "Running Claude (plugin-dir: $PLUGIN_DIR, cwd: $TEST_PROJECT)..."
echo "================================================================================"
cd "$SCRIPT_DIR/../.." && timeout 1800 claude -p "$PROMPT" --allowed-tools=all --add-dir "$TEST_PROJECT" --permission-mode bypassPermissions 2>&1 | tee "$OUTPUT_FILE" || {
cd "$TEST_PROJECT" && timeout 1800 claude -p "$PROMPT" --plugin-dir "$PLUGIN_DIR" --allowed-tools=all --permission-mode bypassPermissions 2>&1 | tee "$OUTPUT_FILE" || {
echo ""
echo "================================================================================"
echo "EXECUTION FAILED (exit code: $?)"
@@ -161,13 +176,17 @@ echo ""
echo "Execution complete. Analyzing results..."
echo ""
# Find the session transcript
# Session files are in ~/.claude/projects/-<working-dir>/<session-id>.jsonl
WORKING_DIR_ESCAPED=$(echo "$SCRIPT_DIR/../.." | sed 's/\//-/g' | sed 's/^-//')
SESSION_DIR="$HOME/.claude/projects/$WORKING_DIR_ESCAPED"
# Find the most recent session file (created during this test run)
SESSION_FILE=$(find "$SESSION_DIR" -name "*.jsonl" -type f -mmin -60 2>/dev/null | sort -r | head -1)
# Find the session transcript. Because we ran claude from $TEST_PROJECT (a
# unique tmp dir), its sessions live in their own ~/.claude/projects/ folder
# and we can pick the most-recent one without racing other concurrent sessions.
# Resolve the real path because macOS mktemp returns /var/... but claude
# normalizes it to /private/var/... when naming the project dir.
TEST_PROJECT_REAL=$(cd "$TEST_PROJECT" && pwd -P)
# Claude normalizes the cwd to a directory name by replacing every non-alphanumeric
# character with `-` (so `_`, `.`, `/` all become `-`).
SESSION_DIR="$HOME/.claude/projects/$(echo "$TEST_PROJECT_REAL" | sed 's|[^a-zA-Z0-9]|-|g')"
# `|| true` prevents pipefail killing the script if ls gets SIGPIPE'd by head.
SESSION_FILE=$(ls -t "$SESSION_DIR"/*.jsonl 2>/dev/null | head -1 || true)
if [ -z "$SESSION_FILE" ]; then
echo "ERROR: Could not find session transcript file"
@@ -194,9 +213,9 @@ else
fi
echo ""
# Test 2: Subagents were used (Task tool)
# Test 2: Subagents were used (Agent / Task tool — name varies by harness version)
echo "Test 2: Subagents dispatched..."
task_count=$(grep -c '"name":"Task"' "$SESSION_FILE" || echo "0")
task_count=$(grep -cE '"name":"(Agent|Task)"' "$SESSION_FILE" || echo "0")
if [ "$task_count" -ge 2 ]; then
echo " [PASS] $task_count subagents dispatched"
else
@@ -205,13 +224,13 @@ else
fi
echo ""
# Test 3: TodoWrite was used for tracking
# Test 3: Claude Code task-tracking tool was used
echo "Test 3: Task tracking..."
todo_count=$(grep -c '"name":"TodoWrite"' "$SESSION_FILE" || echo "0")
todo_count=$(grep -cE '"name":"(TodoWrite|TaskCreate|TaskUpdate|TaskList|TaskGet)"' "$SESSION_FILE" || echo "0")
if [ "$todo_count" -ge 1 ]; then
echo " [PASS] TodoWrite used $todo_count time(s) for task tracking"
echo " [PASS] Task tracking used $todo_count time(s)"
else
echo " [FAIL] TodoWrite not used"
echo " [FAIL] No Claude Code task-tracking tool used"
FAILED=$((FAILED + 1))
fi
echo ""

View File

@@ -1,18 +1,26 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Test: subagent-driven-development skill
# Verifies that the skill is loaded and follows correct workflow
#
# No drill coverage: this test asks the agent to *describe* SDD (string-
# matches its verbal explanation against expected keywords like
# "self-review", "skeptical", "worktree", "Step 1", "loop"). Drill scenarios
# test behavior (real subagent dispatch, plan-following, review loops),
# not description-recall. Kept by design.
set -euo pipefail
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
source "$SCRIPT_DIR/test-helpers.sh"
CLAUDE_PROMPT_TIMEOUT="${CLAUDE_PROMPT_TIMEOUT:-90}"
echo "=== Test: subagent-driven-development skill ==="
echo ""
# Test 1: Verify skill can be loaded
echo "Test 1: Skill loading..."
output=$(run_claude "What is the subagent-driven-development skill? Describe its key steps briefly." 30)
output=$(run_claude "What is the subagent-driven-development skill? Describe its key steps briefly." "$CLAUDE_PROMPT_TIMEOUT")
if assert_contains "$output" "subagent-driven-development\|Subagent-Driven Development\|Subagent Driven" "Skill is recognized"; then
: # pass
@@ -31,9 +39,11 @@ echo ""
# Test 2: Verify skill describes correct workflow order
echo "Test 2: Workflow ordering..."
output=$(run_claude "In the subagent-driven-development skill, what comes first: spec compliance review or code quality review? Be specific about the order." 30)
output=$(run_claude "In the subagent-driven-development skill, what comes first: spec compliance review or code quality review? Answer using exactly this structure:
First: <review type>
Second: <review type>" "$CLAUDE_PROMPT_TIMEOUT")
if assert_order "$output" "spec.*compliance" "code.*quality" "Spec compliance before code quality"; then
if assert_order "$output" "First:.*spec.*compliance" "Second:.*code.*quality" "Spec compliance before code quality"; then
: # pass
else
exit 1
@@ -44,15 +54,17 @@ echo ""
# Test 3: Verify self-review is mentioned
echo "Test 3: Self-review requirement..."
output=$(run_claude "Does the subagent-driven-development skill require implementers to do self-review? What should they check?" 30)
output=$(run_claude "Does the subagent-driven-development skill require implementers to self-review before handoff, and can self-review replace the external reviews? Answer using exactly this structure:
Self-review required: <yes or no>
Self-review replaces external review: <yes or no>" "$CLAUDE_PROMPT_TIMEOUT")
if assert_contains "$output" "self-review\|self review" "Mentions self-review"; then
if assert_contains "$output" "Self-review required:.*yes" "Mentions self-review"; then
: # pass
else
exit 1
fi
if assert_contains "$output" "completeness\|Completeness" "Checks completeness"; then
if assert_contains "$output" "Self-review replaces external review:.*no" "Self-review does not replace external review"; then
: # pass
else
exit 1
@@ -63,7 +75,7 @@ echo ""
# Test 4: Verify plan is read once
echo "Test 4: Plan reading efficiency..."
output=$(run_claude "In subagent-driven-development, how many times should the controller read the plan file? When does this happen?" 30)
output=$(run_claude "In subagent-driven-development, how many times should the controller read the plan file? When does this happen?" "$CLAUDE_PROMPT_TIMEOUT")
if assert_contains "$output" "once\|one time\|single" "Read plan once"; then
: # pass
@@ -82,7 +94,7 @@ echo ""
# Test 5: Verify spec compliance reviewer is skeptical
echo "Test 5: Spec compliance reviewer mindset..."
output=$(run_claude "What is the spec compliance reviewer's attitude toward the implementer's report in subagent-driven-development?" 30)
output=$(run_claude "What is the spec compliance reviewer's attitude toward the implementer's report in subagent-driven-development?" "$CLAUDE_PROMPT_TIMEOUT")
if assert_contains "$output" "not trust\|don't trust\|skeptical\|verify.*independently\|suspiciously" "Reviewer is skeptical"; then
: # pass
@@ -101,7 +113,7 @@ echo ""
# Test 6: Verify review loops
echo "Test 6: Review loop requirements..."
output=$(run_claude "In subagent-driven-development, what happens if a reviewer finds issues? Is it a one-time review or a loop?" 30)
output=$(run_claude "In subagent-driven-development, what happens if a reviewer finds issues? Is it a one-time review or a loop?" "$CLAUDE_PROMPT_TIMEOUT")
if assert_contains "$output" "loop\|again\|repeat\|until.*approved\|until.*compliant" "Review loops mentioned"; then
: # pass
@@ -120,7 +132,9 @@ echo ""
# Test 7: Verify full task text is provided
echo "Test 7: Task context provision..."
output=$(run_claude "In subagent-driven-development, how does the controller provide task information to the implementer subagent? Does it make them read a file or provide it directly?" 30)
output=$(run_claude "In subagent-driven-development, how does the controller provide task information to the implementer subagent? Answer using exactly this structure:
Controller provides: <directly or by file>
Implementer must read plan file: <yes or no>" "$CLAUDE_PROMPT_TIMEOUT")
if assert_contains "$output" "provide.*directly\|full.*text\|paste\|include.*prompt" "Provides text directly"; then
: # pass
@@ -128,7 +142,7 @@ else
exit 1
fi
if assert_not_contains "$output" "read.*file\|open.*file" "Doesn't make subagent read file"; then
if assert_contains "$output" "Implementer must read plan file:.*no" "Doesn't make subagent read file"; then
: # pass
else
exit 1
@@ -139,7 +153,7 @@ echo ""
# Test 8: Verify worktree requirement
echo "Test 8: Worktree requirement..."
output=$(run_claude "What workflow skills are required before using subagent-driven-development? List any prerequisites or required skills." 30)
output=$(run_claude "What workflow skills are required before using subagent-driven-development? List any prerequisites or required skills." "$CLAUDE_PROMPT_TIMEOUT")
if assert_contains "$output" "using-git-worktrees\|worktree" "Mentions worktree requirement"; then
: # pass
@@ -152,7 +166,7 @@ echo ""
# Test 9: Verify main branch warning
echo "Test 9: Main branch red flag..."
output=$(run_claude "In subagent-driven-development, is it okay to start implementation directly on the main branch?" 30)
output=$(run_claude "In subagent-driven-development, is it okay to start implementation directly on the main branch?" "$CLAUDE_PROMPT_TIMEOUT")
if assert_contains "$output" "worktree\|feature.*branch\|not.*main\|never.*main\|avoid.*main\|don't.*main\|consent\|permission" "Warns against main branch"; then
: # pass

View File

@@ -2,6 +2,11 @@
# Test: Does the agent prefer native worktree tools (EnterWorktree) over git worktree add?
# Framework: RED-GREEN-REFACTOR per testing-skills-with-subagents.md
#
# Drill coverage: evals/scenarios/worktree-creation-under-pressure.yaml lifts
# only the PRESSURE phase (existing .worktrees/ + urgency framing). The RED
# and GREEN baselines below are not covered by drill — kept here so the
# RED-GREEN-REFACTOR validation remains rerunnable end-to-end.
#
# RED: Skill without Step 1a (no native tool preference). Agent should use git worktree add.
# GREEN: Skill with Step 1a (explicit tool naming + consent bridge). Agent should use EnterWorktree.
# PRESSURE: Same as GREEN but under time pressure with existing .worktrees/ dir.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Regression check: Superpowers should not route new worktrees through the old
# global worktree directory.
set -euo pipefail
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
REPO_ROOT="$(cd "$SCRIPT_DIR/../.." && pwd)"
USING_SKILL="$REPO_ROOT/skills/using-git-worktrees/SKILL.md"
FINISHING_SKILL="$REPO_ROOT/skills/finishing-a-development-branch/SKILL.md"
ROTOTILL_SPEC="$REPO_ROOT/docs/superpowers/specs/2026-04-06-worktree-rototill-design.md"
ROTOTILL_PLAN="$REPO_ROOT/docs/superpowers/plans/2026-04-06-worktree-rototill.md"
failures=0
assert_contains() {
local file="$1"
local pattern="$2"
local label="$3"
if grep -Fq "$pattern" "$file"; then
echo " [PASS] $label"
else
echo " [FAIL] $label"
echo " Expected to find: $pattern"
echo " In file: $file"
failures=$((failures + 1))
fi
}
assert_not_contains() {
local file="$1"
local pattern="$2"
local label="$3"
if grep -Fq "$pattern" "$file"; then
echo " [FAIL] $label"
echo " Did not expect to find: $pattern"
echo " In file: $file"
failures=$((failures + 1))
else
echo " [PASS] $label"
fi
}
echo "=== Worktree Path Policy Test ==="
echo ""
assert_not_contains "$USING_SKILL" "~/.config/superpowers/worktrees" "using-git-worktrees does not mention old global path"
assert_not_contains "$USING_SKILL" "global legacy" "using-git-worktrees does not use unclear global legacy shorthand"
assert_not_contains "$USING_SKILL" "Global path" "using-git-worktrees has no global path quick-reference row"
assert_contains "$USING_SKILL" 'default to `.worktrees/` at the project root' "using-git-worktrees defaults new manual worktrees to .worktrees/"
assert_not_contains "$FINISHING_SKILL" "~/.config/superpowers/worktrees" "finishing-a-development-branch does not treat old global path as owned"
assert_contains "$FINISHING_SKILL" '`.worktrees/` or `worktrees/`' "finishing-a-development-branch keeps project-local cleanup ownership"
assert_not_contains "$ROTOTILL_SPEC" "~/.config/superpowers/worktrees" "rototill spec does not preserve old global path policy"
assert_not_contains "$ROTOTILL_PLAN" "~/.config/superpowers/worktrees" "rototill plan does not preserve old global path policy"
assert_not_contains "$ROTOTILL_PLAN" "legacy path compat" "rototill plan does not advertise legacy path compatibility"
echo ""
if [ "$failures" -gt 0 ]; then
echo "STATUS: FAILED ($failures failures)"
exit 1
fi
echo "STATUS: PASSED"

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,701 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
REPO_ROOT="$(cd "$SCRIPT_DIR/../.." && pwd)"
SYNC_SCRIPT_SOURCE="$REPO_ROOT/scripts/sync-to-codex-plugin.sh"
BASH_UNDER_TEST="/bin/bash"
PACKAGE_VERSION="1.2.3"
MANIFEST_VERSION="9.8.7"
FAILURES=0
TEST_ROOT=""
pass() {
echo " [PASS] $1"
}
fail() {
echo " [FAIL] $1"
FAILURES=$((FAILURES + 1))
}
assert_equals() {
local actual="$1"
local expected="$2"
local description="$3"
if [[ "$actual" == "$expected" ]]; then
pass "$description"
else
fail "$description"
echo " expected: $expected"
echo " actual: $actual"
fi
}
assert_contains() {
local haystack="$1"
local needle="$2"
local description="$3"
if printf '%s' "$haystack" | grep -Fq -- "$needle"; then
pass "$description"
else
fail "$description"
echo " expected to find: $needle"
fi
}
assert_not_contains() {
local haystack="$1"
local needle="$2"
local description="$3"
if printf '%s' "$haystack" | grep -Fq -- "$needle"; then
fail "$description"
echo " did not expect to find: $needle"
else
pass "$description"
fi
}
assert_matches() {
local haystack="$1"
local pattern="$2"
local description="$3"
if printf '%s' "$haystack" | grep -Eq -- "$pattern"; then
pass "$description"
else
fail "$description"
echo " expected to match: $pattern"
fi
}
assert_not_matches() {
local haystack="$1"
local pattern="$2"
local description="$3"
if printf '%s' "$haystack" | grep -Eq -- "$pattern"; then
fail "$description"
echo " did not expect to match: $pattern"
else
pass "$description"
fi
}
assert_path_absent() {
local path="$1"
local description="$2"
if [[ ! -e "$path" ]]; then
pass "$description"
else
fail "$description"
echo " did not expect path to exist: $path"
fi
}
assert_branch_absent() {
local repo="$1"
local pattern="$2"
local description="$3"
local branches
branches="$(git -C "$repo" branch --list "$pattern")"
if [[ -z "$branches" ]]; then
pass "$description"
else
fail "$description"
echo " did not expect matching branches:"
echo "$branches" | sed 's/^/ /'
fi
}
assert_current_branch() {
local repo="$1"
local expected="$2"
local description="$3"
local actual
actual="$(git -C "$repo" branch --show-current)"
assert_equals "$actual" "$expected" "$description"
}
assert_file_equals() {
local path="$1"
local expected="$2"
local description="$3"
local actual
actual="$(cat "$path")"
assert_equals "$actual" "$expected" "$description"
}
cleanup() {
if [[ -n "$TEST_ROOT" && -d "$TEST_ROOT" ]]; then
rm -rf "$TEST_ROOT"
fi
}
configure_git_identity() {
local repo="$1"
git -C "$repo" config user.name "Test Bot"
git -C "$repo" config user.email "test@example.com"
}
init_repo() {
local repo="$1"
git init -q -b main "$repo"
configure_git_identity "$repo"
}
commit_fixture() {
local repo="$1"
local message="$2"
git -C "$repo" commit -q -m "$message"
}
checkout_fixture_branch() {
local repo="$1"
local branch="$2"
git -C "$repo" checkout -q -b "$branch"
}
write_upstream_fixture() {
local repo="$1"
local with_pure_ignored="${2:-1}"
mkdir -p \
"$repo/.codex-plugin" \
"$repo/.private-journal" \
"$repo/assets" \
"$repo/evals/drill" \
"$repo/hooks" \
"$repo/scripts" \
"$repo/skills/example"
if [[ "$with_pure_ignored" == "1" ]]; then
mkdir -p "$repo/ignored-cache/tmp"
fi
cp "$SYNC_SCRIPT_SOURCE" "$repo/scripts/sync-to-codex-plugin.sh"
cat > "$repo/package.json" <<EOF
{
"name": "fixture-upstream",
"version": "$PACKAGE_VERSION"
}
EOF
cat > "$repo/.gitignore" <<'EOF'
.private-journal/
EOF
if [[ "$with_pure_ignored" == "1" ]]; then
cat >> "$repo/.gitignore" <<'EOF'
ignored-cache/
EOF
fi
cat > "$repo/.codex-plugin/plugin.json" <<EOF
{
"name": "superpowers",
"version": "$MANIFEST_VERSION"
}
EOF
cat > "$repo/assets/superpowers-small.svg" <<'EOF'
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 1 1"></svg>
EOF
printf 'png fixture\n' > "$repo/assets/app-icon.png"
printf 'eval harness fixture\n' > "$repo/evals/drill/README.md"
cat > "$repo/hooks/hooks-codex.json" <<'EOF'
{
"hooks": {
"SessionStart": [
{
"matcher": "startup|resume|clear",
"hooks": [
{
"type": "command",
"command": "\"${PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/run-hook.cmd\" session-start-codex",
"async": false
}
]
}
]
}
}
EOF
cat > "$repo/hooks/session-start" <<'EOF'
#!/usr/bin/env sh
echo "session-start fixture"
EOF
cat > "$repo/hooks/session-start-codex" <<'EOF'
#!/usr/bin/env sh
echo "session-start-codex fixture"
EOF
cat > "$repo/hooks/run-hook.cmd" <<'EOF'
@echo off
echo run-hook fixture
EOF
chmod +x "$repo/hooks/session-start" "$repo/hooks/session-start-codex" "$repo/hooks/run-hook.cmd"
cat > "$repo/skills/example/SKILL.md" <<'EOF'
# Example Skill
Fixture content.
EOF
printf 'tracked keep\n' > "$repo/.private-journal/keep.txt"
printf 'ignored leak\n' > "$repo/.private-journal/leak.txt"
if [[ "$with_pure_ignored" == "1" ]]; then
printf 'ignored cache state\n' > "$repo/ignored-cache/tmp/state.json"
fi
git -C "$repo" add \
.codex-plugin/plugin.json \
.gitignore \
assets/app-icon.png \
assets/superpowers-small.svg \
evals/drill/README.md \
hooks/hooks-codex.json \
hooks/run-hook.cmd \
hooks/session-start \
hooks/session-start-codex \
package.json \
scripts/sync-to-codex-plugin.sh \
skills/example/SKILL.md
git -C "$repo" add -f .private-journal/keep.txt
commit_fixture "$repo" "Initial upstream fixture"
}
write_destination_fixture() {
local repo="$1"
mkdir -p "$repo/plugins/superpowers/skills/example"
printf 'fixture keep\n' > "$repo/plugins/superpowers/.fixture-keep"
cat > "$repo/plugins/superpowers/skills/example/SKILL.md" <<'EOF'
# Example Skill
Fixture content.
EOF
git -C "$repo" add plugins/superpowers/.fixture-keep
git -C "$repo" add plugins/superpowers/skills/example/SKILL.md
commit_fixture "$repo" "Initial destination fixture"
}
add_openai_agent_metadata_fixture() {
local repo="$1"
mkdir -p "$repo/plugins/superpowers/skills/example/agents"
cat > "$repo/plugins/superpowers/skills/example/agents/openai.yaml" <<'EOF'
interface:
display_name: "Example"
short_description: "Destination-owned OpenAI metadata"
EOF
git -C "$repo" add plugins/superpowers/skills/example/agents/openai.yaml
commit_fixture "$repo" "Add OpenAI agent metadata fixture"
}
dirty_tracked_destination_skill() {
local repo="$1"
cat > "$repo/plugins/superpowers/skills/example/SKILL.md" <<'EOF'
# Example Skill
Locally modified fixture content.
EOF
}
write_synced_destination_fixture() {
local repo="$1"
mkdir -p \
"$repo/plugins/superpowers/.codex-plugin" \
"$repo/plugins/superpowers/.private-journal" \
"$repo/plugins/superpowers/assets" \
"$repo/plugins/superpowers/hooks" \
"$repo/plugins/superpowers/skills/example/agents" \
"$repo/plugins/superpowers/skills/example"
cat > "$repo/plugins/superpowers/.codex-plugin/plugin.json" <<EOF
{
"name": "superpowers",
"version": "$MANIFEST_VERSION"
}
EOF
cat > "$repo/plugins/superpowers/assets/superpowers-small.svg" <<'EOF'
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 1 1"></svg>
EOF
printf 'png fixture\n' > "$repo/plugins/superpowers/assets/app-icon.png"
cat > "$repo/plugins/superpowers/hooks/hooks-codex.json" <<'EOF'
{
"hooks": {
"SessionStart": [
{
"matcher": "startup|resume|clear",
"hooks": [
{
"type": "command",
"command": "\"${PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/run-hook.cmd\" session-start-codex",
"async": false
}
]
}
]
}
}
EOF
cat > "$repo/plugins/superpowers/hooks/session-start" <<'EOF'
#!/usr/bin/env sh
echo "session-start fixture"
EOF
cat > "$repo/plugins/superpowers/hooks/session-start-codex" <<'EOF'
#!/usr/bin/env sh
echo "session-start-codex fixture"
EOF
cat > "$repo/plugins/superpowers/hooks/run-hook.cmd" <<'EOF'
@echo off
echo run-hook fixture
EOF
chmod +x "$repo/plugins/superpowers/hooks/session-start" "$repo/plugins/superpowers/hooks/session-start-codex" "$repo/plugins/superpowers/hooks/run-hook.cmd"
cat > "$repo/plugins/superpowers/skills/example/SKILL.md" <<'EOF'
# Example Skill
Fixture content.
EOF
cat > "$repo/plugins/superpowers/skills/example/agents/openai.yaml" <<'EOF'
interface:
display_name: "Example"
short_description: "Destination-owned OpenAI metadata"
EOF
printf 'tracked keep\n' > "$repo/plugins/superpowers/.private-journal/keep.txt"
git -C "$repo" add \
plugins/superpowers/.codex-plugin/plugin.json \
plugins/superpowers/assets/app-icon.png \
plugins/superpowers/assets/superpowers-small.svg \
plugins/superpowers/hooks/hooks-codex.json \
plugins/superpowers/hooks/run-hook.cmd \
plugins/superpowers/hooks/session-start \
plugins/superpowers/hooks/session-start-codex \
plugins/superpowers/skills/example/agents/openai.yaml \
plugins/superpowers/skills/example/SKILL.md \
plugins/superpowers/.private-journal/keep.txt
commit_fixture "$repo" "Initial synced destination fixture"
}
write_stale_ignored_destination_fixture() {
local repo="$1"
mkdir -p "$repo/plugins/superpowers/.private-journal"
printf 'fixture keep\n' > "$repo/plugins/superpowers/.fixture-keep"
printf 'stale ignored leak\n' > "$repo/plugins/superpowers/.private-journal/leak.txt"
git -C "$repo" add plugins/superpowers/.fixture-keep
commit_fixture "$repo" "Initial stale ignored destination fixture"
}
write_fake_gh() {
local bin_dir="$1"
mkdir -p "$bin_dir"
cat > "$bin_dir/gh" <<'EOF'
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail
if [[ "${1:-}" == "auth" && "${2:-}" == "status" ]]; then
exit 0
fi
echo "unexpected gh invocation: $*" >&2
exit 1
EOF
chmod +x "$bin_dir/gh"
}
run_preview() {
local upstream="$1"
local dest="$2"
local fake_bin="$3"
PATH="$fake_bin:$PATH" "$BASH_UNDER_TEST" "$upstream/scripts/sync-to-codex-plugin.sh" -n --local "$dest" 2>&1
}
run_bootstrap_preview() {
local upstream="$1"
local dest="$2"
local fake_bin="$3"
PATH="$fake_bin:$PATH" "$BASH_UNDER_TEST" "$upstream/scripts/sync-to-codex-plugin.sh" -n --bootstrap --local "$dest" 2>&1
}
run_preview_without_manifest() {
local upstream="$1"
local dest="$2"
local fake_bin="$3"
rm -f "$upstream/.codex-plugin/plugin.json"
PATH="$fake_bin:$PATH" "$BASH_UNDER_TEST" "$upstream/scripts/sync-to-codex-plugin.sh" -n --local "$dest" 2>&1
}
run_preview_with_stale_ignored_destination() {
local upstream="$1"
local dest="$2"
local fake_bin="$3"
PATH="$fake_bin:$PATH" "$BASH_UNDER_TEST" "$upstream/scripts/sync-to-codex-plugin.sh" -n --local "$dest" 2>&1
}
run_apply() {
local upstream="$1"
local dest="$2"
local fake_bin="$3"
PATH="$fake_bin:$PATH" "$BASH_UNDER_TEST" "$upstream/scripts/sync-to-codex-plugin.sh" -y --local "$dest" 2>&1
}
run_help() {
local upstream="$1"
local fake_bin="$2"
PATH="$fake_bin:$PATH" "$BASH_UNDER_TEST" "$upstream/scripts/sync-to-codex-plugin.sh" --help 2>&1
}
write_bootstrap_destination_fixture() {
local repo="$1"
printf 'bootstrap fixture\n' > "$repo/README.md"
git -C "$repo" add README.md
commit_fixture "$repo" "Initial bootstrap destination fixture"
}
main() {
local upstream
local mixed_only_upstream
local dest
local dest_branch
local mixed_only_dest
local stale_dest
local dirty_apply_dest
local dirty_apply_dest_branch
local noop_apply_dest
local noop_apply_dest_branch
local fake_bin
local bootstrap_dest
local bootstrap_dest_branch
local preview_status
local preview_output
local preview_section
local bootstrap_status
local bootstrap_output
local missing_manifest_status
local missing_manifest_output
local mixed_only_status
local mixed_only_output
local stale_preview_status
local stale_preview_output
local stale_preview_section
local dirty_apply_status
local dirty_apply_output
local noop_apply_status
local noop_apply_output
local help_output
local script_source
local dirty_skill_path
local noop_openai_metadata_path
echo "=== Test: sync-to-codex-plugin dry-run regression ==="
TEST_ROOT="$(mktemp -d)"
trap cleanup EXIT
upstream="$TEST_ROOT/upstream"
mixed_only_upstream="$TEST_ROOT/mixed-only-upstream"
dest="$TEST_ROOT/destination"
mixed_only_dest="$TEST_ROOT/mixed-only-destination"
stale_dest="$TEST_ROOT/stale-destination"
dirty_apply_dest="$TEST_ROOT/dirty-apply-destination"
dirty_apply_dest_branch="fixture/dirty-apply-target"
noop_apply_dest="$TEST_ROOT/noop-apply-destination"
noop_apply_dest_branch="fixture/noop-apply-target"
bootstrap_dest="$TEST_ROOT/bootstrap-destination"
dest_branch="fixture/preview-target"
bootstrap_dest_branch="fixture/bootstrap-preview-target"
fake_bin="$TEST_ROOT/bin"
init_repo "$upstream"
write_upstream_fixture "$upstream"
init_repo "$mixed_only_upstream"
write_upstream_fixture "$mixed_only_upstream" 0
init_repo "$dest"
write_destination_fixture "$dest"
add_openai_agent_metadata_fixture "$dest"
checkout_fixture_branch "$dest" "$dest_branch"
dirty_tracked_destination_skill "$dest"
init_repo "$mixed_only_dest"
write_destination_fixture "$mixed_only_dest"
init_repo "$stale_dest"
write_stale_ignored_destination_fixture "$stale_dest"
init_repo "$dirty_apply_dest"
write_synced_destination_fixture "$dirty_apply_dest"
checkout_fixture_branch "$dirty_apply_dest" "$dirty_apply_dest_branch"
dirty_tracked_destination_skill "$dirty_apply_dest"
init_repo "$noop_apply_dest"
write_synced_destination_fixture "$noop_apply_dest"
checkout_fixture_branch "$noop_apply_dest" "$noop_apply_dest_branch"
init_repo "$bootstrap_dest"
write_bootstrap_destination_fixture "$bootstrap_dest"
checkout_fixture_branch "$bootstrap_dest" "$bootstrap_dest_branch"
write_fake_gh "$fake_bin"
# This regression test is about dry-run content, so capture the preview
# output even if the current script exits nonzero in --local mode.
set +e
preview_output="$(run_preview "$upstream" "$dest" "$fake_bin")"
preview_status=$?
bootstrap_output="$(run_bootstrap_preview "$upstream" "$bootstrap_dest" "$fake_bin")"
bootstrap_status=$?
mixed_only_output="$(run_preview "$mixed_only_upstream" "$mixed_only_dest" "$fake_bin")"
mixed_only_status=$?
stale_preview_output="$(run_preview_with_stale_ignored_destination "$upstream" "$stale_dest" "$fake_bin")"
stale_preview_status=$?
dirty_apply_output="$(run_apply "$upstream" "$dirty_apply_dest" "$fake_bin")"
dirty_apply_status=$?
noop_apply_output="$(run_apply "$upstream" "$noop_apply_dest" "$fake_bin")"
noop_apply_status=$?
missing_manifest_output="$(run_preview_without_manifest "$upstream" "$dest" "$fake_bin")"
missing_manifest_status=$?
set -e
help_output="$(run_help "$upstream" "$fake_bin")"
script_source="$(cat "$upstream/scripts/sync-to-codex-plugin.sh")"
preview_section="$(printf '%s\n' "$preview_output" | sed -n '/^=== Preview (rsync --dry-run) ===$/,/^=== End preview ===$/p')"
stale_preview_section="$(printf '%s\n' "$stale_preview_output" | sed -n '/^=== Preview (rsync --dry-run) ===$/,/^=== End preview ===$/p')"
dirty_skill_path="$dirty_apply_dest/plugins/superpowers/skills/example/SKILL.md"
noop_openai_metadata_path="$noop_apply_dest/plugins/superpowers/skills/example/agents/openai.yaml"
echo ""
echo "Preview assertions..."
assert_equals "$preview_status" "0" "Preview exits successfully"
assert_contains "$preview_output" "Version: $MANIFEST_VERSION" "Preview uses manifest version"
assert_not_contains "$preview_output" "Version: $PACKAGE_VERSION" "Preview does not use package.json version"
assert_contains "$preview_section" ".codex-plugin/plugin.json" "Preview includes manifest path"
assert_contains "$preview_section" "assets/superpowers-small.svg" "Preview includes SVG asset"
assert_contains "$preview_section" "assets/app-icon.png" "Preview includes PNG asset"
assert_contains "$preview_section" "hooks/hooks-codex.json" "Preview includes Codex hook manifest"
assert_contains "$preview_section" "hooks/session-start" "Preview includes session-start hook"
assert_contains "$preview_section" "hooks/session-start-codex" "Preview includes Codex session-start hook"
assert_contains "$preview_section" "hooks/run-hook.cmd" "Preview includes hook command wrapper"
assert_contains "$preview_section" ".private-journal/keep.txt" "Preview includes tracked ignored file"
assert_not_contains "$preview_section" ".private-journal/leak.txt" "Preview excludes ignored untracked file"
assert_not_contains "$preview_section" "ignored-cache/" "Preview excludes pure ignored directories"
assert_not_contains "$preview_section" "evals/" "Preview excludes eval harness"
assert_not_contains "$preview_output" "Overlay file (.codex-plugin/plugin.json) will be regenerated" "Preview omits overlay regeneration note"
assert_not_contains "$preview_output" "Assets (superpowers-small.svg, app-icon.png) will be seeded from" "Preview omits assets seeding note"
assert_contains "$preview_section" "skills/example/SKILL.md" "Preview reflects dirty tracked destination file"
assert_not_matches "$preview_section" "\\*deleting +skills/example/agents/openai\\.yaml" "Preview preserves destination-owned OpenAI agent metadata"
assert_current_branch "$dest" "$dest_branch" "Preview leaves destination checkout on its original branch"
assert_branch_absent "$dest" "sync/superpowers-*" "Preview does not create sync branch in destination checkout"
echo ""
echo "Mixed-directory assertions..."
assert_equals "$mixed_only_status" "0" "Mixed ignored directory preview exits successfully under /bin/bash"
assert_contains "$mixed_only_output" ".private-journal/keep.txt" "Mixed ignored directory preview still includes tracked ignored file"
assert_not_contains "$mixed_only_output" "ignored-cache/" "Mixed ignored directory preview has no pure ignored directory fixture"
echo ""
echo "Convergence assertions..."
assert_equals "$stale_preview_status" "0" "Stale ignored destination preview exits successfully"
assert_matches "$stale_preview_section" "\\*deleting +\\.private-journal/leak\\.txt" "Preview deletes stale ignored destination file"
echo ""
echo "Bootstrap assertions..."
assert_equals "$bootstrap_status" "0" "Bootstrap preview exits successfully"
assert_contains "$bootstrap_output" "Mode: BOOTSTRAP (creating plugins/superpowers/ when absent)" "Bootstrap preview describes directory creation"
assert_not_contains "$bootstrap_output" "Assets:" "Bootstrap preview omits external assets path"
assert_contains "$bootstrap_output" "Dry run only. Nothing was changed or pushed." "Bootstrap preview remains dry-run only"
assert_path_absent "$bootstrap_dest/plugins/superpowers" "Bootstrap preview does not create destination plugin directory"
assert_current_branch "$bootstrap_dest" "$bootstrap_dest_branch" "Bootstrap preview leaves destination checkout on its original branch"
assert_branch_absent "$bootstrap_dest" "bootstrap/superpowers-*" "Bootstrap preview does not create bootstrap branch in destination checkout"
echo ""
echo "Apply assertions..."
assert_equals "$dirty_apply_status" "1" "Dirty local apply exits with failure"
assert_contains "$dirty_apply_output" "ERROR: local checkout has uncommitted changes under 'plugins/superpowers'" "Dirty local apply reports protected destination path"
assert_current_branch "$dirty_apply_dest" "$dirty_apply_dest_branch" "Dirty local apply leaves destination checkout on its original branch"
assert_branch_absent "$dirty_apply_dest" "sync/superpowers-*" "Dirty local apply does not create sync branch in destination checkout"
assert_file_equals "$dirty_skill_path" "# Example Skill
Locally modified fixture content." "Dirty local apply preserves tracked working-tree file content"
assert_equals "$noop_apply_status" "0" "Clean no-op local apply exits successfully"
assert_contains "$noop_apply_output" "No changes — embedded plugin was already in sync with upstream" "Clean no-op local apply reports no changes"
assert_current_branch "$noop_apply_dest" "$noop_apply_dest_branch" "Clean no-op local apply leaves destination checkout on its original branch"
assert_branch_absent "$noop_apply_dest" "sync/superpowers-*" "Clean no-op local apply does not create sync branch in destination checkout"
assert_file_equals "$noop_openai_metadata_path" "interface:
display_name: \"Example\"
short_description: \"Destination-owned OpenAI metadata\"" "Clean no-op local apply preserves OpenAI agent metadata"
echo ""
echo "Missing manifest assertions..."
assert_equals "$missing_manifest_status" "1" "Missing manifest exits with failure"
assert_contains "$missing_manifest_output" "ERROR: committed Codex manifest missing at" "Missing manifest reports committed manifest path"
echo ""
echo "Help assertions..."
assert_not_contains "$help_output" "--assets-src" "Help omits --assets-src"
echo ""
echo "Source assertions..."
assert_not_contains "$script_source" "regenerated inline" "Source drops regenerated inline phrasing"
assert_not_contains "$script_source" "Brand Assets directory" "Source drops Brand Assets directory phrasing"
assert_not_contains "$script_source" "--assets-src" "Source drops --assets-src"
if [[ $FAILURES -ne 0 ]]; then
echo ""
echo "FAILED: $FAILURES assertion(s) failed."
exit 1
fi
echo ""
echo "PASS"
}
main "$@"

View File

@@ -1,100 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Test where Claude explicitly describes subagent-driven-development before user requests it
# This mimics the original failure scenario
set -e
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
PLUGIN_DIR="$(cd "$SCRIPT_DIR/../.." && pwd)"
TIMESTAMP=$(date +%s)
OUTPUT_DIR="/tmp/superpowers-tests/${TIMESTAMP}/explicit-skill-requests/claude-describes"
mkdir -p "$OUTPUT_DIR"
PROJECT_DIR="$OUTPUT_DIR/project"
mkdir -p "$PROJECT_DIR/docs/superpowers/plans"
echo "=== Test: Claude Describes SDD First ==="
echo "Output dir: $OUTPUT_DIR"
echo ""
cd "$PROJECT_DIR"
# Create a plan
cat > "$PROJECT_DIR/docs/superpowers/plans/auth-system.md" << 'EOF'
# Auth System Implementation Plan
## Task 1: Add User Model
Create user model with email and password fields.
## Task 2: Add Auth Routes
Create login and register endpoints.
## Task 3: Add JWT Middleware
Protect routes with JWT validation.
EOF
# Turn 1: Have Claude describe execution options including SDD
echo ">>> Turn 1: Ask Claude to describe execution options..."
claude -p "I have a plan at docs/superpowers/plans/auth-system.md. Tell me about my options for executing it, including what subagent-driven-development means and how it works." \
--model haiku \
--plugin-dir "$PLUGIN_DIR" \
--dangerously-skip-permissions \
--max-turns 3 \
--output-format stream-json \
> "$OUTPUT_DIR/turn1.json" 2>&1 || true
echo "Done."
# Turn 2: THE CRITICAL TEST - now that Claude has explained it
echo ">>> Turn 2: Request subagent-driven-development..."
FINAL_LOG="$OUTPUT_DIR/turn2.json"
claude -p "subagent-driven-development, please" \
--continue \
--model haiku \
--plugin-dir "$PLUGIN_DIR" \
--dangerously-skip-permissions \
--max-turns 2 \
--output-format stream-json \
> "$FINAL_LOG" 2>&1 || true
echo "Done."
echo ""
echo "=== Results ==="
# Check Turn 1 to see if Claude described SDD
echo "Turn 1 - Claude's description of options (excerpt):"
grep '"type":"assistant"' "$OUTPUT_DIR/turn1.json" | head -1 | jq -r '.message.content[0].text // .message.content' 2>/dev/null | head -c 800 || echo " (could not extract)"
echo ""
echo "---"
echo ""
# Check final turn
SKILL_PATTERN='"skill":"([^"]*:)?subagent-driven-development"'
if grep -q '"name":"Skill"' "$FINAL_LOG" && grep -qE "$SKILL_PATTERN" "$FINAL_LOG"; then
echo "PASS: Skill was triggered after Claude described it"
TRIGGERED=true
else
echo "FAIL: Skill was NOT triggered (Claude may have thought it already knew)"
TRIGGERED=false
echo ""
echo "Tools invoked in final turn:"
grep '"type":"tool_use"' "$FINAL_LOG" | grep -o '"name":"[^"]*"' | sort -u | head -10 || echo " (none)"
echo ""
echo "Final turn response:"
grep '"type":"assistant"' "$FINAL_LOG" | head -1 | jq -r '.message.content[0].text // .message.content' 2>/dev/null | head -c 800 || echo " (could not extract)"
fi
echo ""
echo "Skills triggered in final turn:"
grep -o '"skill":"[^"]*"' "$FINAL_LOG" 2>/dev/null | sort -u || echo " (none)"
echo ""
echo "Logs in: $OUTPUT_DIR"
if [ "$TRIGGERED" = "true" ]; then
exit 0
else
exit 1
fi

View File

@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ if [ -n "$FIRST_SKILL_LINE" ]; then
PREMATURE_TOOLS=$(head -n "$FIRST_SKILL_LINE" "$TURN3_LOG" | \
grep '"type":"tool_use"' | \
grep -v '"name":"Skill"' | \
grep -v '"name":"TodoWrite"' || true)
grep -vE '"name":"(TodoWrite|TaskCreate|TaskUpdate|TaskList|TaskGet)"' || true)
if [ -n "$PREMATURE_TOOLS" ]; then
echo "WARNING: Tools invoked BEFORE Skill tool in Turn 3:"
echo "$PREMATURE_TOOLS" | head -5

View File

@@ -103,11 +103,11 @@ echo "Checking for premature action..."
FIRST_SKILL_LINE=$(grep -n '"name":"Skill"' "$LOG_FILE" | head -1 | cut -d: -f1)
if [ -n "$FIRST_SKILL_LINE" ]; then
# Check if any non-Skill, non-system tools were invoked before the first Skill invocation
# Filter out system messages, TodoWrite (planning is ok), and other non-action tools
# Filter out task tracking tools (planning is ok) and other non-action tools
PREMATURE_TOOLS=$(head -n "$FIRST_SKILL_LINE" "$LOG_FILE" | \
grep '"type":"tool_use"' | \
grep -v '"name":"Skill"' | \
grep -v '"name":"TodoWrite"' || true)
grep -vE '"name":"(TodoWrite|TaskCreate|TaskUpdate|TaskList|TaskGet)"' || true)
if [ -n "$PREMATURE_TOOLS" ]; then
echo "WARNING: Tools invoked BEFORE Skill tool:"
echo "$PREMATURE_TOOLS" | head -5

240
tests/hooks/test-session-start.sh Executable file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,240 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
REPO_ROOT="$(cd "$SCRIPT_DIR/../.." && pwd)"
HOOK_UNDER_TEST="$REPO_ROOT/hooks/session-start"
CODEX_HOOK_UNDER_TEST="$REPO_ROOT/hooks/session-start-codex"
WRAPPER_UNDER_TEST="$REPO_ROOT/hooks/run-hook.cmd"
FAILURES=0
TEST_ROOT="$(mktemp -d)"
cleanup() {
rm -rf "$TEST_ROOT"
}
trap cleanup EXIT
pass() {
echo " [PASS] $1"
}
fail() {
echo " [FAIL] $1"
FAILURES=$((FAILURES + 1))
}
make_home() {
local name="$1"
local home="$TEST_ROOT/$name/home"
mkdir -p "$home"
printf '%s\n' "$home"
}
assert_command_output() {
local description="$1"
local shape="$2"
local contains="$3"
local not_contains="$4"
local home="$5"
shift 5
local output
if ! output="$(env -i PATH="${PATH:-}" HOME="$home" "$@" 2>&1)"; then
fail "$description"
echo " hook exited non-zero"
echo "$output" | sed 's/^/ /'
return
fi
if printf '%s' "$output" | \
EXPECT_SHAPE="$shape" \
EXPECT_CONTAINS="$contains" \
EXPECT_NOT_CONTAINS="$not_contains" \
node -e '
const fs = require("fs");
const input = fs.readFileSync(0, "utf8");
let payload;
try {
payload = JSON.parse(input);
} catch (error) {
console.error(`invalid JSON: ${error.message}`);
process.exit(1);
}
function hasOwn(object, key) {
return Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(object, key);
}
function fail(message) {
console.error(message);
process.exit(1);
}
const shape = process.env.EXPECT_SHAPE;
let context;
if (shape === "nested") {
if (!hasOwn(payload, "hookSpecificOutput")) {
fail("missing hookSpecificOutput");
}
if (hasOwn(payload, "additional_context") || hasOwn(payload, "additionalContext")) {
fail("nested output also included a top-level context field");
}
const hookOutput = payload.hookSpecificOutput;
if (!hookOutput || typeof hookOutput !== "object" || Array.isArray(hookOutput)) {
fail("hookSpecificOutput is not an object");
}
if (hookOutput.hookEventName !== "SessionStart") {
fail(`unexpected hookEventName: ${hookOutput.hookEventName}`);
}
context = hookOutput.additionalContext;
} else if (shape === "cursor") {
if (hasOwn(payload, "hookSpecificOutput")) {
fail("cursor output included hookSpecificOutput");
}
if (!hasOwn(payload, "additional_context")) {
fail("cursor output missing additional_context");
}
if (hasOwn(payload, "additionalContext")) {
fail("cursor output included additionalContext");
}
context = payload.additional_context;
} else if (shape === "sdk") {
if (hasOwn(payload, "hookSpecificOutput")) {
fail("sdk output included hookSpecificOutput");
}
if (!hasOwn(payload, "additionalContext")) {
fail("sdk output missing additionalContext");
}
if (hasOwn(payload, "additional_context")) {
fail("sdk output included additional_context");
}
context = payload.additionalContext;
} else {
fail(`unknown expected shape: ${shape}`);
}
if (typeof context !== "string" || context.trim() === "") {
fail("injected context was empty");
}
const expectedText = process.env.EXPECT_CONTAINS || "";
if (expectedText && !context.includes(expectedText)) {
fail(`context did not contain expected text: ${expectedText}`);
}
const forbiddenTexts = (process.env.EXPECT_NOT_CONTAINS || "")
.split("\u001f")
.filter(Boolean);
for (const forbiddenText of forbiddenTexts) {
if (context.includes(forbiddenText)) {
fail(`context contained forbidden text: ${forbiddenText}`);
}
}
'; then
pass "$description"
else
fail "$description"
echo " output:"
echo "$output" | sed 's/^/ /'
fi
}
echo "SessionStart hook output tests"
claude_home="$(make_home claude-code)"
assert_command_output \
"Claude Code emits nested SessionStart additionalContext" \
"nested" \
"" \
"" \
"$claude_home" \
CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT="$REPO_ROOT" \
bash "$HOOK_UNDER_TEST"
codex_home="$(make_home codex-plugin-hooks)"
codex_data="$TEST_ROOT/codex-plugin-hooks/data"
mkdir -p "$codex_data"
assert_command_output \
"Codex plugin hooks use dedicated script and emit nested SessionStart additionalContext" \
"nested" \
"" \
"" \
"$codex_home" \
PLUGIN_DATA="$codex_data" \
CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA="$codex_data" \
PLUGIN_ROOT="$REPO_ROOT" \
CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT="$REPO_ROOT" \
bash "$CODEX_HOOK_UNDER_TEST"
codex_wrapper_home="$(make_home codex-wrapper)"
codex_wrapper_data="$TEST_ROOT/codex-wrapper/data"
mkdir -p "$codex_wrapper_data"
assert_command_output \
"Codex wrapper path dispatches to dedicated script" \
"nested" \
"" \
"" \
"$codex_wrapper_home" \
PLUGIN_DATA="$codex_wrapper_data" \
CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA="$codex_wrapper_data" \
PLUGIN_ROOT="$REPO_ROOT" \
CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT="$REPO_ROOT" \
bash "$WRAPPER_UNDER_TEST" session-start-codex
cursor_home="$(make_home cursor)"
assert_command_output \
"Cursor emits top-level additional_context only" \
"cursor" \
"" \
"" \
"$cursor_home" \
CURSOR_PLUGIN_ROOT="$REPO_ROOT" \
CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT="$REPO_ROOT" \
bash "$HOOK_UNDER_TEST"
copilot_home="$(make_home copilot-cli)"
assert_command_output \
"Copilot CLI emits top-level additionalContext only" \
"sdk" \
"" \
"" \
"$copilot_home" \
COPILOT_CLI=1 \
CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT="$REPO_ROOT" \
bash "$HOOK_UNDER_TEST"
legacy_home="$(make_home legacy-warning-removed)"
mkdir -p "$legacy_home/.config/superpowers/skills"
assert_command_output \
"SessionStart omits obsolete legacy custom-skill warning" \
"nested" \
"" \
"Superpowers now uses"$'\037'"~/.config/superpowers/skills"$'\037'"~/.claude/skills"$'\037'"legacy" \
"$legacy_home" \
CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT="$REPO_ROOT" \
bash "$HOOK_UNDER_TEST"
codex_legacy_home="$(make_home codex-legacy-warning-removed)"
codex_legacy_data="$TEST_ROOT/codex-legacy-warning-removed/data"
mkdir -p "$codex_legacy_home/.config/superpowers/skills" "$codex_legacy_data"
assert_command_output \
"Codex SessionStart omits obsolete legacy custom-skill warning" \
"nested" \
"" \
"Superpowers now uses"$'\037'"~/.config/superpowers/skills"$'\037'"~/.claude/skills"$'\037'"legacy" \
"$codex_legacy_home" \
PLUGIN_DATA="$codex_legacy_data" \
CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA="$codex_legacy_data" \
PLUGIN_ROOT="$REPO_ROOT" \
CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT="$REPO_ROOT" \
bash "$CODEX_HOOK_UNDER_TEST"
if [[ "$FAILURES" -gt 0 ]]; then
echo "STATUS: FAILED ($FAILURES failure(s))"
exit 1
fi
echo "STATUS: PASSED"

View File

@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]; do
echo ""
echo "Tests:"
echo " test-plugin-loading.sh Verify plugin installation and structure"
echo " test-bootstrap-caching.sh Verify bootstrap content caching"
echo " test-tools.sh Test use_skill and find_skills tools (integration)"
echo " test-priority.sh Test skill priority resolution (integration)"
exit 0
@@ -59,6 +60,7 @@ done
# List of tests to run (no external dependencies)
tests=(
"test-plugin-loading.sh"
"test-bootstrap-caching.sh"
)
# Integration tests (require OpenCode)

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
import fs from 'fs';
import { pathToFileURL } from 'url';
const [, , pluginPath, scenario] = process.argv;
if (!pluginPath || !['present', 'missing'].includes(scenario)) {
console.error('Usage: node test-bootstrap-caching.mjs PLUGIN_PATH present|missing');
process.exit(2);
}
let existsCount = 0;
let readCount = 0;
const originalExistsSync = fs.existsSync;
const originalReadFileSync = fs.readFileSync;
fs.existsSync = function (...args) {
if (isBootstrapSkillPath(args[0])) {
existsCount += 1;
}
return originalExistsSync.apply(this, args);
};
fs.readFileSync = function (...args) {
if (isBootstrapSkillPath(args[0])) {
readCount += 1;
}
return originalReadFileSync.apply(this, args);
};
const mod = await import(pathToFileURL(pluginPath).href);
const plugin = await mod.SuperpowersPlugin({ client: {}, directory: '.' });
const transform = plugin['experimental.chat.messages.transform'];
const firstOutput = makeOutput(`${scenario} bootstrap first step`);
await transform({}, firstOutput);
const afterFirst = { existsCount, readCount };
const secondOutput = makeOutput(`${scenario} bootstrap second step`);
await transform({}, secondOutput);
const afterSecond = { existsCount, readCount };
const result = {
scenario,
firstBootstrapParts: countBootstrapParts(firstOutput),
secondBootstrapParts: countBootstrapParts(secondOutput),
staleMentionMapping: bootstrapText(firstOutput).includes('@mention'),
staleTaskMapping: bootstrapText(firstOutput).includes('`Task` tool with subagents'),
mapsSubagentToTask: bootstrapText(firstOutput).includes('`task` with `subagent_type: "general"`'),
mapsMutationToApplyPatch: bootstrapText(firstOutput).includes('`apply_patch`'),
firstReadCount: afterFirst.readCount,
secondReadCount: afterSecond.readCount,
firstExistsCount: afterFirst.existsCount,
secondExistsCount: afterSecond.existsCount,
};
const failures = scenario === 'present'
? assertPresentBootstrap(result)
: assertMissingBootstrap(result);
if (failures.length > 0) {
console.error(JSON.stringify(result, null, 2));
for (const failure of failures) {
console.error(`FAIL: ${failure}`);
}
process.exit(1);
}
console.log(JSON.stringify(result, null, 2));
function isBootstrapSkillPath(filePath) {
return String(filePath).replaceAll('\\', '/').includes('using-superpowers/SKILL.md');
}
function makeOutput(text) {
return {
messages: [{
info: { role: 'user' },
parts: [{ type: 'text', text }],
}],
};
}
function countBootstrapParts(output) {
return output.messages[0].parts.filter(
(part) => part.type === 'text' && part.text.includes('EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT')
).length;
}
function bootstrapText(output) {
return output.messages[0].parts.find(
(part) => part.type === 'text' && part.text.includes('EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT')
)?.text || '';
}
function assertPresentBootstrap(result) {
const failures = [];
if (result.firstBootstrapParts !== 1) {
failures.push(`expected first transform to inject one bootstrap part, got ${result.firstBootstrapParts}`);
}
if (result.secondBootstrapParts !== 1) {
failures.push(`expected second transform to inject one bootstrap part, got ${result.secondBootstrapParts}`);
}
if (result.firstReadCount !== 1) {
failures.push(`expected first transform to read SKILL.md once, got ${result.firstReadCount}`);
}
if (result.secondReadCount !== result.firstReadCount) {
failures.push(`expected cached second transform to do no additional reads, got ${result.secondReadCount - result.firstReadCount}`);
}
if (result.secondExistsCount !== result.firstExistsCount) {
failures.push(`expected cached second transform to do no additional exists checks, got ${result.secondExistsCount - result.firstExistsCount}`);
}
if (result.staleMentionMapping) {
failures.push('expected OpenCode bootstrap not to teach @mention subagent syntax');
}
if (result.staleTaskMapping) {
failures.push('expected OpenCode bootstrap not to teach stale Task-tool mapping');
}
if (!result.mapsSubagentToTask) {
failures.push('expected OpenCode bootstrap to map general-purpose subagents to task with subagent_type');
}
if (!result.mapsMutationToApplyPatch) {
failures.push('expected OpenCode bootstrap to map file mutation to apply_patch');
}
return failures;
}
function assertMissingBootstrap(result) {
const failures = [];
if (result.firstBootstrapParts !== 0) {
failures.push(`expected no bootstrap when SKILL.md is missing, got ${result.firstBootstrapParts}`);
}
if (result.secondBootstrapParts !== 0) {
failures.push(`expected no bootstrap on second missing-file transform, got ${result.secondBootstrapParts}`);
}
if (result.firstReadCount !== 0 || result.secondReadCount !== 0) {
failures.push(`expected missing file path to avoid reads, got ${result.secondReadCount}`);
}
if (result.firstExistsCount < 1) {
failures.push('expected first transform to check whether SKILL.md exists');
}
if (result.secondExistsCount !== result.firstExistsCount) {
failures.push(`expected missing-file result to be cached, got ${result.secondExistsCount - result.firstExistsCount} extra exists checks`);
}
return failures;
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Test: Bootstrap Content Caching (#1202)
# Verifies the OpenCode transform caches bootstrap content between agent steps.
set -euo pipefail
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
echo "=== Test: Bootstrap Content Caching (#1202) ==="
source "$SCRIPT_DIR/setup.sh"
trap cleanup_test_env EXIT
run_present_file_check() {
node "$SCRIPT_DIR/test-bootstrap-caching.mjs" "$SUPERPOWERS_PLUGIN_FILE" present
}
run_missing_file_check() {
mv "$SUPERPOWERS_SKILLS_DIR/using-superpowers/SKILL.md" "$TEST_HOME/using-superpowers.SKILL.md.bak"
node "$SCRIPT_DIR/test-bootstrap-caching.mjs" "$SUPERPOWERS_PLUGIN_FILE" missing
}
echo "Test 1: Caches bootstrap after the first successful transform..."
run_present_file_check
echo " [PASS] Bootstrap content is cached while fresh message arrays still receive injection"
echo "Test 2: Caches missing SKILL.md result..."
run_missing_file_check
echo " [PASS] Missing bootstrap file is cached and not re-probed every transform"
echo ""
echo "=== All bootstrap caching tests passed ==="

View File

@@ -1,10 +1,13 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Test: Skill Priority Resolution
# Verifies that skills are resolved with correct priority: project > personal > superpowers
# Documents current OpenCode duplicate-name behavior for local and bundled
# skills. The desired local-shadowing behavior is tracked separately; this
# test keeps the integration suite honest without adding a plugin workaround.
# NOTE: These tests require OpenCode to be installed and configured
set -euo pipefail
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
OPENCODE_TEST_TIMEOUT_SECONDS="${OPENCODE_TEST_TIMEOUT_SECONDS:-120}"
echo "=== Test: Skill Priority Resolution ==="
@@ -96,103 +99,119 @@ if ! command -v opencode &> /dev/null; then
exit 0
fi
# Test 2: Test that personal overrides superpowers
run_opencode() {
local result_var="$1"
local dir="$2"
local prompt="$3"
local command_output
local exit_code
set +e
command_output=$(cd "$dir" && timeout "${OPENCODE_TEST_TIMEOUT_SECONDS}s" opencode run --print-logs --format json "$prompt" 2>&1)
exit_code=$?
set -e
if [ $exit_code -eq 124 ]; then
echo " [FAIL] OpenCode timed out after ${OPENCODE_TEST_TIMEOUT_SECONDS}s"
exit 1
fi
if [ $exit_code -ne 0 ]; then
echo " [FAIL] OpenCode returned non-zero exit code: $exit_code"
echo " Output was:"
awk 'NR <= 80 { print }' <<<"$command_output"
exit 1
fi
printf -v "$result_var" '%s' "$command_output"
}
assert_contains() {
local output="$1"
local needle="$2"
local message="$3"
if [[ "$output" == *"$needle"* ]]; then
echo " [PASS] $message"
else
echo " [FAIL] $message"
echo " Expected to find: $needle"
echo " Output was:"
awk 'NR <= 80 { print }' <<<"$output"
exit 1
fi
}
first_skill_tool_event() {
awk '/"type":"tool_use"/ && /"tool":"skill"/ { print; exit }' <<<"$1"
}
describe_priority_result() {
local output="$1"
local expected_marker="$2"
local fallback_marker="$3"
local pass_message="$4"
local known_bug_message="$5"
local loaded_skill
loaded_skill="$(first_skill_tool_event "$output")"
if [[ "$loaded_skill" == *"$expected_marker"* ]]; then
echo " [PASS] $pass_message"
elif [[ "$loaded_skill" == *"$fallback_marker"* ]]; then
echo " [INFO] $known_bug_message"
echo " [INFO] Tracked separately: OpenCode bundled skills can shadow local skills with duplicate native names"
else
echo " [FAIL] Could not verify priority marker in native skill tool output"
echo " Output was:"
awk 'NR <= 80 { print }' <<<"$output"
exit 1
fi
}
# Test 2: Document personal vs bundled superpowers priority
echo ""
echo "Test 2: Testing personal > superpowers priority..."
echo "Test 2: Documenting personal vs superpowers priority..."
echo " Running from outside project directory..."
# Run from HOME (not in project) - should get personal version
cd "$HOME"
output=$(timeout 60s opencode run --print-logs "Use the use_skill tool to load the priority-test skill. Show me the exact content including any PRIORITY_MARKER text." 2>&1) || {
exit_code=$?
if [ $exit_code -eq 124 ]; then
echo " [FAIL] OpenCode timed out after 60s"
exit 1
fi
}
run_opencode output "$HOME" "Call the skill tool with name \"priority-test\". Show the exact content including any PRIORITY_MARKER text."
describe_priority_result \
"$output" \
"PRIORITY_MARKER_PERSONAL_VERSION" \
"PRIORITY_MARKER_SUPERPOWERS_VERSION" \
"Personal version loaded for duplicate native skill name" \
"Current OpenCode behavior loaded bundled superpowers version instead of personal version"
if echo "$output" | grep -qi "PRIORITY_MARKER_PERSONAL_VERSION"; then
echo " [PASS] Personal version loaded (overrides superpowers)"
elif echo "$output" | grep -qi "PRIORITY_MARKER_SUPERPOWERS_VERSION"; then
echo " [FAIL] Superpowers version loaded instead of personal"
exit 1
else
echo " [WARN] Could not verify priority marker in output"
echo " Output snippet:"
echo "$output" | grep -i "priority\|personal\|superpowers" | head -10
fi
# Test 3: Test that project overrides both personal and superpowers
# Test 3: Document project vs bundled superpowers priority
echo ""
echo "Test 3: Testing project > personal > superpowers priority..."
echo "Test 3: Documenting project vs personal/superpowers priority..."
echo " Running from project directory..."
# Run from project directory - should get project version
cd "$TEST_HOME/test-project"
output=$(timeout 60s opencode run --print-logs "Use the use_skill tool to load the priority-test skill. Show me the exact content including any PRIORITY_MARKER text." 2>&1) || {
exit_code=$?
if [ $exit_code -eq 124 ]; then
echo " [FAIL] OpenCode timed out after 60s"
exit 1
fi
}
run_opencode output "$TEST_HOME/test-project" "Call the skill tool with name \"priority-test\". Show the exact content including any PRIORITY_MARKER text."
describe_priority_result \
"$output" \
"PRIORITY_MARKER_PROJECT_VERSION" \
"PRIORITY_MARKER_SUPERPOWERS_VERSION" \
"Project version loaded for duplicate native skill name" \
"Current OpenCode behavior loaded bundled superpowers version instead of project version"
if echo "$output" | grep -qi "PRIORITY_MARKER_PROJECT_VERSION"; then
echo " [PASS] Project version loaded (highest priority)"
elif echo "$output" | grep -qi "PRIORITY_MARKER_PERSONAL_VERSION"; then
echo " [FAIL] Personal version loaded instead of project"
exit 1
elif echo "$output" | grep -qi "PRIORITY_MARKER_SUPERPOWERS_VERSION"; then
echo " [FAIL] Superpowers version loaded instead of project"
exit 1
else
echo " [WARN] Could not verify priority marker in output"
echo " Output snippet:"
echo "$output" | grep -i "priority\|project\|personal" | head -10
fi
# Test 4: Test explicit superpowers: prefix bypasses priority
# Test 4: Test a non-colliding bundled superpowers skill is still available
echo ""
echo "Test 4: Testing superpowers: prefix forces superpowers version..."
echo "Test 4: Testing non-colliding superpowers skill remains available..."
cd "$TEST_HOME/test-project"
output=$(timeout 60s opencode run --print-logs "Use the use_skill tool to load superpowers:priority-test specifically. Show me the exact content including any PRIORITY_MARKER text." 2>&1) || {
exit_code=$?
if [ $exit_code -eq 124 ]; then
echo " [FAIL] OpenCode timed out after 60s"
exit 1
fi
}
mkdir -p "$SUPERPOWERS_SKILLS_DIR/superpowers-only-test"
cat > "$SUPERPOWERS_SKILLS_DIR/superpowers-only-test/SKILL.md" <<'EOF'
---
name: superpowers-only-test
description: Superpowers-only priority test skill
---
# Superpowers Only Test Skill
if echo "$output" | grep -qi "PRIORITY_MARKER_SUPERPOWERS_VERSION"; then
echo " [PASS] superpowers: prefix correctly forces superpowers version"
elif echo "$output" | grep -qi "PRIORITY_MARKER_PROJECT_VERSION\|PRIORITY_MARKER_PERSONAL_VERSION"; then
echo " [FAIL] superpowers: prefix did not force superpowers version"
exit 1
else
echo " [WARN] Could not verify priority marker in output"
fi
PRIORITY_MARKER_SUPERPOWERS_ONLY_VERSION
EOF
# Test 5: Test explicit project: prefix
echo ""
echo "Test 5: Testing project: prefix forces project version..."
cd "$HOME" # Run from outside project but with project: prefix
output=$(timeout 60s opencode run --print-logs "Use the use_skill tool to load project:priority-test specifically. Show me the exact content." 2>&1) || {
exit_code=$?
if [ $exit_code -eq 124 ]; then
echo " [FAIL] OpenCode timed out after 60s"
exit 1
fi
}
# Note: This may fail since we're not in the project directory
# The project: prefix only works when in a project context
if echo "$output" | grep -qi "not found\|error"; then
echo " [PASS] project: prefix correctly fails when not in project context"
else
echo " [INFO] project: prefix behavior outside project context may vary"
fi
run_opencode output "$TEST_HOME/test-project" "Call the skill tool with name \"superpowers-only-test\". Show the exact content including any PRIORITY_MARKER text."
assert_contains "$output" "PRIORITY_MARKER_SUPERPOWERS_ONLY_VERSION" "Non-colliding superpowers skill is still registered"
echo ""
echo "=== All priority tests passed ==="

View File

@@ -1,10 +1,12 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Test: Tools Functionality
# Verifies that use_skill and find_skills tools work correctly
# Test: Native Skill Tool Functionality
# Verifies that OpenCode's native skill tool can load personal, project,
# and bundled superpowers skills.
# NOTE: These tests require OpenCode to be installed and configured
set -euo pipefail
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
OPENCODE_TEST_TIMEOUT_SECONDS="${OPENCODE_TEST_TIMEOUT_SECONDS:-120}"
echo "=== Test: Tools Functionality ==="
@@ -21,84 +23,73 @@ if ! command -v opencode &> /dev/null; then
exit 0
fi
# Test 1: Test find_skills tool via direct invocation
echo "Test 1: Testing find_skills tool..."
echo " Running opencode with find_skills request..."
run_opencode() {
local result_var="$1"
local dir="$2"
local prompt="$3"
local command_output
local exit_code
# Use timeout to prevent hanging, capture both stdout and stderr
output=$(timeout 60s opencode run --print-logs "Use the find_skills tool to list available skills. Just call the tool and show me the raw output." 2>&1) || {
set +e
command_output=$(cd "$dir" && timeout "${OPENCODE_TEST_TIMEOUT_SECONDS}s" opencode run --print-logs --format json "$prompt" 2>&1)
exit_code=$?
set -e
if [ $exit_code -eq 124 ]; then
echo " [FAIL] OpenCode timed out after 60s"
echo " [FAIL] OpenCode timed out after ${OPENCODE_TEST_TIMEOUT_SECONDS}s"
exit 1
fi
echo " [WARN] OpenCode returned non-zero exit code: $exit_code"
}
# Check for expected patterns in output
if echo "$output" | grep -qi "superpowers:brainstorming\|superpowers:using-superpowers\|Available skills"; then
echo " [PASS] find_skills tool discovered superpowers skills"
else
echo " [FAIL] find_skills did not return expected skills"
echo " Output was:"
echo "$output" | head -50
exit 1
fi
# Check if personal test skill was found
if echo "$output" | grep -qi "personal-test"; then
echo " [PASS] find_skills found personal test skill"
else
echo " [WARN] personal test skill not found in output (may be ok if tool returned subset)"
fi
# Test 2: Test use_skill tool
echo ""
echo "Test 2: Testing use_skill tool..."
echo " Running opencode with use_skill request..."
output=$(timeout 60s opencode run --print-logs "Use the use_skill tool to load the personal-test skill and show me what you get." 2>&1) || {
exit_code=$?
if [ $exit_code -eq 124 ]; then
echo " [FAIL] OpenCode timed out after 60s"
if [ $exit_code -ne 0 ]; then
echo " [FAIL] OpenCode returned non-zero exit code: $exit_code"
echo " Output was:"
awk 'NR <= 80 { print }' <<<"$command_output"
exit 1
fi
echo " [WARN] OpenCode returned non-zero exit code: $exit_code"
printf -v "$result_var" '%s' "$command_output"
}
# Check for the skill marker we embedded
if echo "$output" | grep -qi "PERSONAL_SKILL_MARKER_12345\|Personal Test Skill\|Launching skill"; then
echo " [PASS] use_skill loaded personal-test skill content"
else
echo " [FAIL] use_skill did not load personal-test skill correctly"
echo " Output was:"
echo "$output" | head -50
exit 1
fi
assert_contains() {
local output="$1"
local needle="$2"
local message="$3"
# Test 3: Test use_skill with superpowers: prefix
echo ""
echo "Test 3: Testing use_skill with superpowers: prefix..."
echo " Running opencode with superpowers:brainstorming skill..."
output=$(timeout 60s opencode run --print-logs "Use the use_skill tool to load superpowers:brainstorming and tell me the first few lines of what you received." 2>&1) || {
exit_code=$?
if [ $exit_code -eq 124 ]; then
echo " [FAIL] OpenCode timed out after 60s"
if [[ "$output" == *"$needle"* ]]; then
echo " [PASS] $message"
else
echo " [FAIL] $message"
echo " Expected to find: $needle"
echo " Output was:"
awk 'NR <= 80 { print }' <<<"$output"
exit 1
fi
echo " [WARN] OpenCode returned non-zero exit code: $exit_code"
}
# Check for expected content from brainstorming skill
if echo "$output" | grep -qi "brainstorming\|Launching skill\|skill.*loaded"; then
echo " [PASS] use_skill loaded superpowers:brainstorming skill"
else
echo " [FAIL] use_skill did not load superpowers:brainstorming correctly"
echo " Output was:"
echo "$output" | head -50
exit 1
fi
# Test 1: Test personal skill loading via OpenCode's native skill tool
echo "Test 1: Testing native skill tool with a personal skill..."
echo " Running opencode with personal-test request..."
run_opencode output "$TEST_HOME/test-project" "Call the skill tool with name \"personal-test\". Then print the PERSONAL_SKILL_MARKER_12345 marker."
assert_contains "$output" '"tool":"skill"' "OpenCode called the native skill tool"
assert_contains "$output" "PERSONAL_SKILL_MARKER_12345" "native skill tool loaded personal-test skill content"
# Test 2: Test project skill loading
echo ""
echo "Test 2: Testing native skill tool with a project skill..."
echo " Running opencode with project-test request..."
run_opencode output "$TEST_HOME/test-project" "Call the skill tool with name \"project-test\". Then print the PROJECT_SKILL_MARKER_67890 marker."
assert_contains "$output" "PROJECT_SKILL_MARKER_67890" "native skill tool loaded project-test skill content"
# Test 3: Test bundled superpowers skill loading
echo ""
echo "Test 3: Testing native skill tool with a superpowers skill..."
echo " Running opencode with brainstorming skill..."
run_opencode output "$TEST_HOME/test-project" "Call the skill tool with name \"brainstorming\". Then tell me the loaded skill title."
assert_contains "$output" '"name":"brainstorming"' "native skill tool loaded bundled brainstorming skill"
assert_contains "$output" "Brainstorming Ideas Into Designs" "brainstorming skill content was returned"
echo ""
echo "=== All tools tests passed ==="
echo "=== All native skill tool tests passed ==="

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
import assert from 'node:assert/strict';
import { readFile } from 'node:fs/promises';
import { existsSync } from 'node:fs';
import { dirname, resolve } from 'node:path';
import { fileURLToPath, pathToFileURL } from 'node:url';
import test from 'node:test';
const __dirname = dirname(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url));
const repoRoot = resolve(__dirname, '../..');
const packageJsonPath = resolve(repoRoot, 'package.json');
const extensionPath = resolve(repoRoot, '.pi/extensions/superpowers.ts');
const piToolsPath = resolve(repoRoot, 'skills/using-superpowers/references/pi-tools.md');
async function readPackageJson() {
return JSON.parse(await readFile(packageJsonPath, 'utf8'));
}
async function loadExtension() {
const handlers = new Map();
const pi = {
on(event, handler) {
if (!handlers.has(event)) handlers.set(event, []);
handlers.get(event).push(handler);
},
};
const mod = await import(pathToFileURL(extensionPath).href + `?cachebust=${Date.now()}-${Math.random()}`);
mod.default(pi);
return { handlers };
}
function firstHandler(handlers, event) {
const eventHandlers = handlers.get(event) ?? [];
assert.equal(eventHandlers.length, 1, `expected one ${event} handler`);
return eventHandlers[0];
}
function textOf(message) {
if (typeof message.content === 'string') return message.content;
return message.content
.filter((part) => part.type === 'text')
.map((part) => part.text)
.join('\n');
}
test('package.json declares a pi package with skills and extension resources', async () => {
const pkg = await readPackageJson();
assert.equal(pkg.name, 'superpowers');
assert.ok(pkg.keywords.includes('pi-package'));
assert.deepEqual(pkg.pi.skills, ['./skills']);
assert.deepEqual(pkg.pi.extensions, ['./.pi/extensions/superpowers.ts']);
});
test('extension registers lifecycle hooks without pre-compaction injection', async () => {
const { handlers } = await loadExtension();
for (const event of ['resources_discover', 'session_start', 'session_compact', 'context', 'agent_end']) {
assert.equal((handlers.get(event) ?? []).length, 1, `missing ${event} handler`);
}
assert.equal((handlers.get('session_before_compact') ?? []).length, 0);
});
test('resources_discover contributes the bundled skills directory', async () => {
const { handlers } = await loadExtension();
const discover = firstHandler(handlers, 'resources_discover');
const result = await discover({ type: 'resources_discover', cwd: repoRoot, reason: 'startup' }, {});
assert.deepEqual(result.skillPaths, [resolve(repoRoot, 'skills')]);
});
test('startup context injects the bootstrap as one user message until agent_end', async () => {
const { handlers } = await loadExtension();
const sessionStart = firstHandler(handlers, 'session_start');
const context = firstHandler(handlers, 'context');
const agentEnd = firstHandler(handlers, 'agent_end');
await sessionStart({ type: 'session_start', reason: 'startup' }, {});
const originalMessages = [
{ role: 'user', content: [{ type: 'text', text: 'Let us make a react todo list' }], timestamp: 1 },
];
const result = await context({ type: 'context', messages: originalMessages }, {});
assert.equal(result.messages.length, 2);
assert.equal(result.messages[0].role, 'user');
assert.match(textOf(result.messages[0]), /You have superpowers/);
assert.match(textOf(result.messages[0]), /Pi tool mapping/);
assert.equal(result.messages[1], originalMessages[0]);
const repeatedProviderRequest = await context({ type: 'context', messages: originalMessages }, {});
assert.equal(repeatedProviderRequest.messages.length, 2);
assert.match(textOf(repeatedProviderRequest.messages[0]), /You have superpowers/);
const alreadyInjected = await context({ type: 'context', messages: result.messages }, {});
assert.equal(alreadyInjected, undefined, 'bootstrap should not duplicate when already present');
await agentEnd({ type: 'agent_end', messages: [] }, {});
const afterEnd = await context({ type: 'context', messages: originalMessages }, {});
assert.equal(afterEnd, undefined, 'startup bootstrap should clear after agent_end');
});
test('session_compact injects bootstrap after compaction summaries, not before compaction', async () => {
const { handlers } = await loadExtension();
const sessionCompact = firstHandler(handlers, 'session_compact');
const context = firstHandler(handlers, 'context');
await sessionCompact({ type: 'session_compact', compactionEntry: {}, fromExtension: false }, {});
const summary = { role: 'compactionSummary', summary: 'Prior work summary', tokensBefore: 123, timestamp: 1 };
const user = { role: 'user', content: [{ type: 'text', text: 'Continue' }], timestamp: 2 };
const result = await context({ type: 'context', messages: [summary, user] }, {});
assert.equal(result.messages.length, 3);
assert.equal(result.messages[0], summary);
assert.equal(result.messages[1].role, 'user');
assert.match(textOf(result.messages[1]), /You have superpowers/);
assert.equal(result.messages[2], user);
});
test('pi tools reference documents pi-specific mappings', async () => {
assert.equal(existsSync(piToolsPath), true, 'pi-tools.md should exist');
const text = await readFile(piToolsPath, 'utf8');
for (const expected of ['Skill', 'Task', 'TodoWrite', 'read', 'write', 'edit', 'bash']) {
assert.match(text, new RegExp(expected));
}
});

View File

@@ -1,8 +0,0 @@
I have 4 independent test failures happening in different modules:
1. tests/auth/login.test.ts - "should redirect after login" is failing
2. tests/api/users.test.ts - "should return user list" returns 500
3. tests/components/Button.test.tsx - snapshot mismatch
4. tests/utils/date.test.ts - timezone handling broken
These are unrelated issues in different parts of the codebase. Can you investigate all of them?

Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More