mirror of
https://github.com/rennf93/roboco.git
synced 2026-08-03 07:23:24 +02:00
roboco-app[bot]GitHubUX/UI Developer 1roboco-app[bot] <302741806+roboco-app[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>* [c77c3e89] docs(ux_ui): add blocker-findings audit report and link from README (#735) Document ux-pm's three triage passes (2026-07-29/2026-07-30) confirming zero open BLOCKER-severity findings on ux_ui tasks, per the Sentinel [findings] org-wide audit root. Co-authored-by: UX/UI Developer 1 <ux-dev-1@roboco.tech> * [45478af5] fix(docs): reflow blocker-findings audit prose and clarify triage date span (#737) Co-authored-by: UX/UI Developer 1 <ux-dev-1@roboco.tech> --------- Co-authored-by: roboco-app[bot] <302741806+roboco-app[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: UX/UI Developer 1 <ux-dev-1@roboco.tech>
22 lines
2.1 KiB
Markdown
22 lines
2.1 KiB
Markdown
# UX/UI Blocker-Findings Audit — 2026-07-29
|
|
|
|
## Outcome
|
|
|
|
**0 open BLOCKER-severity findings** were found on ux_ui tasks across the 2026-07-29 to 2026-07-30 triage span (final pass 2026-07-30).
|
|
|
|
This audit was triggered by the org-wide Sentinel `[findings]` root, which flagged 6 open BLOCKER-severity findings (plus 2 major, 2 minor) sitting unaddressed in the `task_review_findings` ledger across the company. Main PM routed the audit to all three cell PMs since no cross-team findings-query tool exists. ux-pm's job was to triage the ux_ui cell's own `needs_revision` / `awaiting_pm_review` backlog for tasks carrying an open blocker-severity finding, drive each to addressed then verified, and report a count plus a lifecycle assessment.
|
|
|
|
## Triaged
|
|
|
|
ux-pm ran three separate `triage()` / `give_me_work()` passes across two sessions, all with the same result — zero ux_ui tasks in `needs_revision` or `awaiting_pm_review`:
|
|
|
|
- **2026-07-29 ~16:52 UTC** — first pass, called immediately after claiming the root audit task.
|
|
- **2026-07-29 ~18:23 UTC** — re-check pass, run after a submit_up attempt on the audit's own report hit a GitHub 422 (no commits to diff for a report-only deliverable) and the task bounced back through an escalation.
|
|
- **2026-07-30 ~05:27 UTC** — second-session re-check pass, confirming the result still held a day later.
|
|
|
|
Every pass returned no ux_ui task sitting in `needs_revision` or `awaiting_pm_review`. This was cross-referenced against `recent_team_activity` from the session briefing, which showed every recent ux_ui task — design specs, doc reflows, video releases — as `completed` or `in_progress`, with none stuck in `needs_revision`.
|
|
|
|
## Assessment
|
|
|
|
Because the ux_ui backlog is empty, this audit gives **no direct evidence** either way on whether the `mark_addressed` / `mark_verified` finding lifecycle is broken in this cell — it only shows that nothing is currently stuck. A live case (a finding resolved via `resolved_findings` but never re-claimed for the follow-up verifying pass) would be needed to actually exercise and observe that lifecycle in practice. No lifecycle-wiring gap was found in the ux_ui cell today.
|