Files
roboco/CLAUDE.md
T
Renn F 17ec52d1b7 feat(conventions): generalize defaults, backfill old projects, adopt the standard in-repo
Harden the architectural-conventions standard so it works out-of-the-box on
any project and resolves for projects that predate it, and make RoboCo pass
its own gate.

General defaults (apply to every project, not just one with a tuned file):
- The auto-scan excludes test and documentation trees (tests/, docs/) — those
  legitimately define fixtures and aren't enforced code.
- Helper placement seeds at warn, not block: `helper` matches any top-level
  function, too blunt a signal to hard-block a route file's small private glue.
  Misplaced model/route/component stay block; the body-level thin_routes check
  remains the real fat-handler guard.
- thin_routes no longer counts transaction-lifecycle calls (commit/flush/
  refresh) as data access — an explicit `db.commit()` after delegating to a
  service is a valid pattern.
- no_lint_suppressions exempts a small allowlist of structurally-unavoidable
  framework codes (ruff TC001-TC003, pydantic prop-decorator); bare or other
  suppressions still flag.
- CLAUDE.md rule-lifting skips bare common-word tokens that would match
  everywhere (e.g. "commit"), keeping only specific identifiers.
- The ambient prompt block lists only constrained modules and truncates at a
  line boundary with a "+N more" pointer instead of cutting mid-line.

Backfill: the standard previously read the committed file + repo scan from
project.workspace_path, a field only a manual API call set — so an older
project (or one whose workspace was cleared) showed an empty "missing" map no
matter what was pushed. The service now ensures a dedicated, default-branch
read clone on demand (WorkspaceService.ensure_read_clone) and resolves from
it, persisting the resolved path + real HEAD. The panel tab, the spawn-time
ambient block, and the per-task constraints all resolve the committed standard
with no manual setup.

Adopt in-repo: relocate the inline request/response models from the system and
*_live route modules into roboco/api/schemas/ so the codebase passes its own
placement gate, and ship a canonical .roboco/conventions.yml. no_models_in_routes
and modular_cohesion are now clean and enforced at block.

Docs updated across the user guide, the agent-facing RAG standard, the
developer and pr_reviewer role prompts, CLAUDE.md, and the changelog. New unit
tests cover the scan exclusions, helper-warn, the suppression allowlist, the
commit exemption, and the resolve/backfill path; the conventions + project
integration suites pass against Postgres.
2026-06-22 18:15:19 +02:00

540 lines
31 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# CLAUDE.md
This file provides guidance to Claude Code (claude.ai/code) when working with code in this repository.
## Licensing
RoboCo is licensed under **AGPL-3.0** (see `LICENSE`). Copyright (c) 2026 Renzo Franceschini. Do NOT reintroduce an MIT or other license reference anywhere (README, headers, package metadata) — the project is AGPL.
Contributions require a signed **Contributor License Agreement** (`CLA.md`), automated via the CLA Assistant workflow (`.github/workflows/cla.yml`). The CLA preserves the option to dual-license / offer a commercial edition later; keep copyright assignment language intact. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
## Project Overview
**RoboCo** is an AI Agentic Company - a virtual organization of 25 AI agents + 1 human CEO, designed to operate as a complete software development workforce. The system implements a structured organizational hierarchy with formal communication protocols, task management, and quality controls.
### Core Architecture
```
CEO (Renzo - Human)
|
+-- Intake (on-demand interviewer: chats only with the CEO to draft a task)
+-- Secretary (on-demand chief-of-staff: reads company state, runs gated CEO directives)
+-- PR Reviewer (read-only: the main reviewer — inbound external/fork + internal PRs, and the root→master in-path gate)
|
+-- Board (3 agents)
+-- Product Owner
+-- Head of Marketing
+-- Auditor (silent observer, reports to CEO)
|
+-- Main PM (coordinates all cells)
|
+-- Backend Cell (6 agents: 2 Devs, 1 QA, 1 PM, 1 Documenter, 1 PR Reviewer)
+-- Frontend Cell (6 agents: 2 Devs, 1 QA, 1 PM, 1 Documenter, 1 PR Reviewer)
+-- UX/UI Cell (6 agents: 2 Devs, 1 QA, 1 PM, 1 Documenter, 1 PR Reviewer)
```
### Hardware Infrastructure
- **Olares One (Powerhouse)**: Intel Ultra 9 + RTX 5090, runs Claude Code instances and AI inference - NOT YET ARRIVED
- **UGREEN NAS (Warehouse)**: 36TB RAID6, 128GB RAM, hosts PostgreSQL, Redis
- **Pi Cluster (Operations)**: Monitoring, notifications, smart home
## Development Standards
### Python (Backend)
```bash
# Package manager
uv
# Before any commit
uv run ruff format .
uv run ruff check .
uv run mypy roboco/
uv run pytest
# Coverage target: 80%
```
### TypeScript (Frontend)
```bash
# Package manager
pnpm
# Before any commit
pnpm format
pnpm lint
pnpm typecheck
pnpm test
# Coverage target: 80%
```
## Technology Stack
| Layer | Technology |
|-------|------------|
| API Framework | FastAPI |
| Database | PostgreSQL + asyncpg |
| Vector Store | PostgreSQL + pgvector (in-house engine) |
| RAG Engine | in-house (asyncpg + pgvector, hybrid retrieval) |
| Cache/Queue | Redis |
| Container Runtime | Docker + Docker Compose |
| Cloud LLM | Claude API (claude-opus-4-6) + xAI Grok (official `grok` CLI, SuperGrok subscription) |
| Local LLM | Ollama (glm-5:cloud for RAG/hybrid retrieval) |
| Embeddings | qwen3-embedding:0.6b (1024 dim) |
| Frontend | Next.js 16 + TypeScript + Tailwind + Radix UI (in `panel/`) |
| Edge / Proxy | nginx (single entry point on port 3000) |
## Multi-Agent Workspace Structure
Each agent gets their own git clone of a project, enabling parallel development without conflicts:
```
{ROBOCO_WORKSPACES_ROOT}/ # Default: /data/workspaces
+-- {project-slug}/
+-- {team}/
+-- {agent-slug}/
+-- [git repository]
```
**Example:**
```
/data/workspaces/
+-- roboco/
+-- backend/
| +-- be-dev-1/ # be-dev-1's workspace
| +-- be-dev-2/ # be-dev-2's workspace
+-- frontend/
+-- fe-dev-1/
+-- fe-dev-2/
```
Note: the Next.js control panel now lives at `roboco/panel/` inside this repo (no longer a separate `roboco-panel` project or workspace).
**Key Configuration (roboco/config.py):**
- `ROBOCO_WORKSPACES_ROOT`: Root directory for workspaces (default: `/data/workspaces`)
- `ROBOCO_WORKSPACE_AUTO_CLONE`: Auto-clone repos on first access (default: `true`)
- `ROBOCO_WORKSPACE_CLONE_TIMEOUT`: Clone timeout in seconds (default: `300`)
On a Python workspace, `WorkspaceService` runs `uv sync --extra dev` (not plain `uv sync`) so the clone's `.venv` carries the full gate toolchain (ruff/mypy/xenon/pytest) — the lint/type/complexity tools live in the `dev` **extra**, which plain `uv sync` skips. Without it an agent's `make quality` fails on `ruff: command not found` and the agent can't gate its own work.
## Git Workflow
### Branch Naming Convention
Branch names follow the pattern: `{type}/{team}/{task-hierarchy}`
**Types:** `feature`, `bug`, `chore`, `docs`, `hotfix`
**Task Hierarchy:** Uses `--` separator (not `/`) to avoid git ref conflicts.
**Examples:**
- Root task: `feature/backend/ABC12345`
- Subtask: `feature/backend/ABC12345--DEF67890`
- Sub-subtask: `feature/backend/ABC12345--DEF67890--GHI11111`
### Commit Format
Commits are automatically prefixed with the task ID:
```
[{task-id[:8]}] {message}
```
**Example:**
```
[ABC12345] Add user authentication endpoint
```
### Work Sessions
When a developer claims a task, a **WorkSession** is created that tracks:
- Branch name and base/target branches
- All commits made during the session
- Files modified
- PR number/URL when created
- Merge status and who merged
### Git Credentials
Git authentication is managed **per-project** through encrypted GitHub PATs:
- **Each project stores its own git token** - no global fallback
- **Tokens are encrypted at rest** using Fernet symmetric encryption
- **API never exposes tokens** - only returns `has_git_token: boolean`
- **Self-service via UI** - users set/update tokens in project settings
**Project fields:**
| Field | Description |
|-------|-------------|
| `git_token_encrypted` | Fernet-encrypted GitHub PAT (DB column) |
| `has_git_token` | Boolean indicator for API responses |
**Token flow:**
1. User creates project in UI, enters GitHub PAT
2. Token encrypted and stored in `projects.git_token_encrypted`
3. WorkspaceService decrypts token when cloning repos
4. GitService decrypts token for PR operations (gh CLI)
**HTTPS URLs require tokens** - attempting to clone without a token will raise `WorkspaceError`.
## Task Lifecycle
### Task States
The complete task lifecycle is defined in `roboco/foundation/policy/lifecycle.py` (`roboco/enforcement/task_lifecycle.py` is a backwards-compat shim over it):
```
backlog -> pending -> claimed -> in_progress -> [blocked|paused] -> verifying
| |
v v
awaiting_qa <------------------+ awaiting_documentation
| (needs_revision) | |
v | v
awaiting_documentation --------+ awaiting_pm_review
| |
v v
awaiting_pm_review awaiting_ceo_approval
| |
v v
completed completed
```
**In-path PR-review gate** (`awaiting_pr_review`): each assembled PR is reviewed before the PM merges. The cell PM's `submit_up` opens the cell→root PR and the Main PM's `submit_root` opens the root→master PR; both enter `awaiting_pr_review`, where a reviewer `pr_pass`es it on to `awaiting_pm_review` or `pr_fail`s it back to `needs_revision` — the merge-level reject the PM otherwise lacks. Leaf dev tasks and branchless coordination roots skip the gate.
**States:**
| State | Description |
|-------|-------------|
| `backlog` | PM setup phase - dependencies or session setup needed |
| `pending` | Ready for work - orchestrator can spawn agents |
| `claimed` | Agent has locked the task |
| `in_progress` | Active development |
| `blocked` | External dependency blocking progress |
| `paused` | Temporarily stopped (can resume) |
| `verifying` | Self-verification by developer |
| `needs_revision` | QA or CEO requested changes |
| `awaiting_qa` | Submitted for QA review — PR must already exist |
| `awaiting_documentation` | Documentation phase — PR already open from pre-QA; doc writes docs |
| `awaiting_pr_review` | In-path PR-review gate: a reviewer checks the assembled cell→root / root→master PR before the PM merges (assembled, PR-bearing tasks only) |
| `awaiting_pm_review` | Docs complete, PM reviews + merges |
| `awaiting_ceo_approval` | Major tasks escalated for CEO final approval |
| `completed` | Terminal state - work done and merged |
| `cancelled` | Terminal state - work cancelled |
### Role-Based Transitions
All status transitions are validated through the enforcement layer. Key restrictions:
| Transition | Allowed Roles |
|------------|---------------|
| `backlog``pending` (activate) | PM roles only |
| `pending``claimed` (claim) | Role must match task type (QA for awaiting_qa, etc.) |
| `claimed``pending` (unclaim) | Assignee or PM |
| `awaiting_qa``awaiting_documentation` (pass) | QA only |
| `awaiting_qa``needs_revision` (fail) | QA only |
| `awaiting_documentation``awaiting_pm_review` | Documenter or Developer (parallel completion) |
| `in_progress``awaiting_pr_review` (submit_up / submit_root) | PM roles (opens the assembled cell→root / root→master PR) |
| `awaiting_pr_review``awaiting_pm_review` (pr_pass) | PR reviewer only |
| `awaiting_pr_review``needs_revision` (pr_fail) | PR reviewer only |
| `awaiting_pm_review``completed` | PM roles only |
| `awaiting_pm_review``awaiting_ceo_approval` | PM roles only |
| `awaiting_ceo_approval``completed/needs_revision/cancelled` | CEO only |
| Any → `cancelled` | PM roles only |
**Unclaim Operation**: Agents can release claimed tasks back to the pool using `unclaim()`. This transitions `claimed``pending` and optionally reassigns to another agent.
### Git Integration Requirements
All tasks follow git workflow. PR is created BEFORE QA review (not after) so QA can review the real PR diff on GitHub and downstream PM/CEO approval chain off a PR that already exists:
1. **claimed -> in_progress**: `branch_name` is auto-set on claim (hierarchical branches)
2. **verifying -> awaiting_qa** (submit-qa): Requires `self_verified`, `commits`, `pr_number` (PR open), and at least one `progress_updates` entry
3. **awaiting_qa -> awaiting_documentation** (pass-qa): Requires `pr_number` and substantive QA notes
4. **awaiting_documentation -> awaiting_pm_review**: Requires `docs_complete=True` (PR already exists from step 2 above)
5. **awaiting_pm_review -> awaiting_ceo_approval**: Must have `pr_number` set and all subtasks in a terminal state
### CEO Approval Workflow
Major tasks are escalated to CEO for final approval:
1. PM reviews and approves, escalates to `awaiting_ceo_approval`
2. CEO can:
- **Approve**: Merges PR, task -> `completed`
- **Request changes**: Task -> `needs_revision`
- **Cancel**: Task -> `cancelled`
## Data Models
### Core Models (roboco/models/)
| Model | Purpose |
|-------|---------|
| `Task` | Atomic unit of work with acceptance criteria |
| `Project` | Git repository configuration and CI/CD commands |
| `WorkSession` | Links agent work to task, tracks branch/commits/PR |
| `Agent` | AI agent with role, team, capabilities |
| `Session` | Communication session with messages |
| `Channel` | Team communication channel |
| `Message` | Extracted message from agent streams |
| `Notification` | Formal notification requiring acknowledgment |
| `Journal` | Agent personal log for reflections/learnings |
### Task Model Key Fields
```python
# Git configuration (all tasks follow git workflow)
task_type: TaskType # code, documentation, research, planning, design, administrative
project_id: UUID # Project this task works on (required)
branch_name: str # Branch for this task (auto-created on claim)
work_session_id: UUID # Active work session
# PR tracking (parallel execution in awaiting_documentation)
pr_number: int # GitHub/GitLab PR number
pr_url: str # Full URL to PR
docs_complete: bool # Documenter has finished
pr_created: bool # Developer has created PR
# Commits linked to task
commits: list[CommitRef] # All commits made for this task
```
## Communication Model
**Communication** = constant stream (always flowing, logged, observed) **Notifications** = formal signals (require acknowledgment, sent by PMs/Board only)
### Channel Structure
- Cell channels: `#backend-cell`, `#frontend-cell`, `#uxui-cell`
- Cross-cell: `#dev-all`, `#qa-all`, `#pm-all`, `#doc-all`
- Management: `#main-pm-board`, `#board-private`
- Special: `#announcements` (read-only except Board/Main PM), `#all-hands`
The Auditor has silent read access to ALL channels.
## Key Principles
1. **Everything is a task** - All work is tracked and documented
2. **No work without a task** - Create task record first
3. **No task without acceptance criteria** - How do we know it's done?
4. **No closure without documentation** - Future agents need context
5. **Communication is constant** - Stream reasoning, log everything
6. **State is sacred** - If interrupted, state must be recoverable
7. **The Auditor sees all** - Quality monitored silently
8. **Commits linked to tasks** - Every commit references its task ID
9. **CEO approves major changes** - Escalation path for important work
## Agent Gateway
Agents do not call the API or per-domain MCP tools directly. They go through two thin MCP servers (`roboco-flow`, `roboco-do`) backed by the server-side **Choreographer** in `roboco/services/gateway/`. The Choreographer composes the existing services (TaskService, JournalService, GitService, etc.) into intent-verb sequences. Tracing, claim-locking, evidence assembly, and remediation hints are all centralized there.
Each agent gets a **spawn manifest** at `/app/tool-manifest.json` listing the verbs its role is allowed to call. The orchestrator builds the manifest from `roboco/services/gateway/role_config.py` and mounts it read-only into the agent container.
### Verb surface (canonical source: `lifecycle.intents_for_role`; every role also gets `i_am_idle`)
| Role | Flow verbs (beyond `i_am_idle`) |
|---------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| developer | `give_me_work`, `i_will_work_on`, `open_pr`, `i_am_done`, `i_am_blocked`, `resume`, `unclaim` |
| qa | `give_me_work`, `claim_review`, `pass_review`, `fail_review`, `i_am_blocked`, `resume`, `unclaim` |
| documenter | `give_me_work`, `claim_doc_task`, `i_documented`, `i_am_blocked`, `resume`, `unclaim` |
| cell_pm | `give_me_work`, `i_will_plan`, `delegate`, `complete`, `submit_up`, `triage`, `unblock`, `escalate_up`, `reassign`, `resume`, `unclaim` |
| main_pm | `give_me_work`, `i_will_plan`, `delegate`, `complete`, `submit_root`, `triage`, `triage_all`, `unblock`, `escalate_up`, `escalate_to_ceo`, `resume`, `unclaim` |
| pr_reviewer | `give_me_work`, `claim_pr_review`, `post_pr_review` (inbound external/fork PRs), `claim_gate_review`, `pr_pass`, `pr_fail` (in-path assembled-PR gate) |
| product_owner | `triage`, `escalate_to_ceo` |
| head_marketing| `triage`, `escalate_to_ceo` |
| auditor | `triage` (read-only — no `say`/`dm`) |
| prompter | (none beyond `i_am_idle` — not a delivery-lifecycle role; intake interviewer, human-only) |
| secretary | (none beyond `i_am_idle` — human-only chief-of-staff; reads company state + runs gated CEO directives) |
Content tools (do_server) — most roles: `commit`, `note`, `say`, `dm`, `evidence`. Auditor is restricted to `note` (scope=reflect) + `evidence`. The `pr_reviewer` posts its change-request on the PR itself (no agent comms). The `prompter` (intake) and `secretary` are restricted to `note` + `evidence` — human-only, no `say`/`dm`/`notify`.
### MCP servers running per agent container
| Server | Purpose |
|----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| `roboco-flow` | Intent verbs (give_me_work, i_am_done, claim_review, complete, ...) |
| `roboco-do` | Content tools (commit, note, say, dm, evidence) |
| `roboco-git-readonly`| Read-only git: status, log, diff, branches |
| `roboco-optimal` | RAG: `roboco_ask_mentor`, `roboco_kb_search` |
| `roboco-docs` | Project docs file management (selected roles) |
Every verb returns a standardized **Envelope**:
- ok: `{status, task_id, next, evidence?, context_briefing}`
- error: `{error, message, remediate, missing}`
The `next` field tells the agent what to call next; the `remediate` field on errors tells them exactly how to fix and retry. Agents should not guess state — trust the response.
## Agent Providers
Agent backends are pluggable. `roboco/llm/providers/` defines an `AgentProvider` lifecycle ABC (`base.py`) and a `ProviderRegistry` keyed by `ModelProvider` (`registry.py`), with `ClaudeCodeProvider` (default) and `GrokCliProvider`. The orchestrator resolves a provider at spawn from the agent's `ModelProvider`; when no dedicated provider is registered it falls back to the built-in Claude Code spawn. `ModelProvider` (`roboco/models/base.py`) is `ANTHROPIC` (default), `GROK`, `LOCAL`, `OLLAMA_CLOUD`, `OPENAI` (reserved). The seam is additive: only `GROK` routes through `GrokCliProvider`; Anthropic / Ollama Cloud / self-hosted spawns are unchanged, and every provider gets the same MCP gateway + tool-manifest wiring by construction.
**Grok runtime.** `GROK` agents run xAI's official `grok` CLI (model `grok-build`) authenticated by a **SuperGrok subscription**, not a metered API key — so a Grok workforce can't stall mid-task on out-of-credits. The host `~/.grok/auth.json` is mounted **read-only** into each agent (`GrokCliProvider._append_grok_auth_mount`; `ROBOCO_HOST_GROK_DIR` is the host mount source, set up once with `grok login`). It reaches parity with the Claude path by construction: same MCP gateway + manifest, per-role tool-removal and git-operation deny rules, a prompt-injection guard on the task prompt, headless tool auto-approval, and per-agent token/cost capture from the grok session store. It covers both one-shot delivery roles and the interactive Intake (Prompter) and Secretary chats (per-turn `grok -p` with session resume).
**Token auto-refresh.** The grok access token has a fixed ~6h server-set TTL and the CLI cannot refresh it headlessly — on an expired token it hangs forever at an interactive login prompt. The orchestrator mints a fresh token from the offline-access refresh token (xAI's OIDC `refresh_token` grant) before expiry and rewrites the shared `auth.json` in place (`roboco/llm/providers/grok_auth.py` `refresh_if_stale`, run once per dispatch tick; the orchestrator's `~/.grok` mount is read-write so it can rewrite it). As a backstop the agent entrypoint runs `python -m roboco.llm.providers.grok_auth --check` and refuses to start (exit 78) on a missing/expired token instead of hanging.
## Self-Healing & Feature Flags
**Self-healing CI loop (default-off).** RoboCo can watch its own repository's CI (a single named workflow) and, on a detected regression, open a fix task that is held out of dispatch until the CEO approves it (it terminates at `awaiting_ceo_approval`), then dispatch it through the normal delivery flow. It is dormant by default and armed by `ROBOCO_SELF_HEAL_ENABLED` plus a second opt-in `ROBOCO_SELF_HEAL_ORIGINATE_ENABLED`; origination is bounded by `ROBOCO_SELF_HEAL_MAX_OPEN_TASKS` / `_MAX_PER_CYCLE` so it can't flood the backlog. It never auto-merges or self-deploys (`roboco/services/self_heal_engine.py`).
**Feature flags / company-in-a-box.** Env-gated, default-off subsystems toggle from the panel's Settings → Feature Flags card (`panel/src/components/settings/feature-flags-card.tsx`) instead of hand-editing env: web research (`ROBOCO_RESEARCH_ENABLED`), the strategy engine (`ROBOCO_STRATEGY_ENGINE_ENABLED`), pitch provisioning (`ROBOCO_PROVISIONING_*`), external / internal PR review, the agent-runtime toolchain match (`ROBOCO_TOOLCHAIN_MATCH_ENABLED`), the architectural-conventions standard (`ROBOCO_CONVENTIONS_ENABLED`), and the self-heal flags above. A toggle persists in the settings store and takes effect on the next backend restart; an unset flag falls back to its environment / config default.
## Architectural Conventions Standard
**Per-project architectural standard (default-off).** Beyond the `make`-style gates (which check syntax/types/tests, not *where code lives*), each project can carry a repo-canonical `.roboco/conventions.yml` — an architecture map (which definition *kinds* belong in which modules), a toggleable rule set, custom regex rules, and waivers — so an agent cannot land a Pydantic model defined inside a router or a `# noqa` / `# type: ignore`. Placement of a *helper* (any top-level function) only **warns** — too blunt to hard-block; `thin_routes` doesn't count an explicit `db.commit()`; and a small allowlist of unavoidable framework suppressions (ruff `TC001``TC003`, pydantic `prop-decorator`) is exempt. Gated by `ROBOCO_CONVENTIONS_ENABLED`; fully inert when off. RoboCo itself ships a canonical `.roboco/conventions.yml`.
**Effective map.** Consumers read the *effective* map — auto-derived defaults (from a repo scan + `BUILTIN_RULES`, excluding `tests/`/`docs/` trees) overlaid by the committed file — so behaviour is identical whether the file is present, absent, or partial. `ConventionsService` (`roboco/services/conventions.py`) builds it, caches it per `(project, HEAD sha)` in `project_conventions_cache` (migration `043`), renders the per-task baseline constraints + the ambient prompt block, and scaffolds/restores the file via a PR (`GitService.open_conventions_pr`). The committed file + scan are read from a dedicated project-level **read clone** the service ensures on demand (`WorkspaceService.ensure_read_clone`, pinned to the default branch's HEAD) — the backfill that makes the standard resolve even for a project created before it existed, with no manual `workspace_path`. The schema lives in `roboco/foundation/policy/conventions/` (pure).
**Validator.** A single Python CLI, `python -m roboco.conventions check --root <repo> --files <a> <b> ...` (`roboco/conventions/`), uses tree-sitter (Python + TypeScript grammars, shipped in the agent image) to classify each changed definition and flag forbidden placements + hygiene + custom-rule matches as JSONL findings, after waiver filtering. Precision over recall (it abstains when uncertain so a `block` gate can't false-positive-strand a task) and fail-loud (a validator that cannot run exits 3 so the gate blocks, never silently passes).
**Threading + enforcement.** The standard reaches the work two ways: an ambient "Architectural Standard" block injected at spawn (`compose_prompt`) and an auto-attached `## Constraints` section on every project task (`TaskService.create`). Enforcement is deterministic: a `block`-level finding refuses `i_am_done` (dev pre-submit) and `pr_pass` (the in-path PR gate) with the offending `file:line` + fix hint; findings also surface in QA's `claim_review` evidence (`convention_findings`). A false positive is relieved by a `waiver` the dev commits in their branch — accountable, reviewed in the PR. The panel's per-project Conventions tab (in the edit-project dialog) shows the map + health and offers Save / Restore.
## Services
Core services in `roboco/services/`:
| Service | Purpose |
|---------|---------|
| `TaskService` | Task CRUD and state transitions |
| `WorkSessionService` | Git session management, PR lifecycle |
| `WorkspaceService` | Multi-agent workspace resolution and cloning |
| `ProjectService` | Project/repository management |
| `MessagingService` | Channels, sessions, messages |
| `NotificationService` | Formal notifications |
| `JournalService` | Agent journals and entries |
| `OptimalService` | RAG queries (in-house pgvector engine) |
| `PermissionsService` | Role-based access control |
## Configuration
Key settings in `roboco/config.py` (env prefix: `ROBOCO_`):
```bash
# Database
ROBOCO_DATABASE_HOST=localhost
ROBOCO_DATABASE_PORT=5432
ROBOCO_DATABASE_USER=roboco
ROBOCO_DATABASE_PASSWORD=roboco
ROBOCO_DATABASE_NAME=roboco
# Redis
ROBOCO_REDIS_HOST=localhost
ROBOCO_REDIS_PORT=6379
# Security (REQUIRED)
# Generate with: python -c 'from cryptography.fernet import Fernet; print(Fernet.generate_key().decode())'
ROBOCO_ENCRYPTION_KEY=<your-fernet-key>
# Workspaces
ROBOCO_WORKSPACES_ROOT=/data/workspaces
ROBOCO_WORKSPACE_AUTO_CLONE=true
ROBOCO_WORKSPACE_CLONE_TIMEOUT=300
# RAG (in-house pgvector engine)
ROBOCO_RAG_CHUNK_STRATEGY=fixed
ROBOCO_RAG_CHUNK_SIZE=512
ROBOCO_RAG_USE_HYDE=true
ROBOCO_RAG_USE_HYBRID_SEARCH=true
# AI/LLM
ROBOCO_DEFAULT_EMBEDDING_MODEL=qwen3-embedding:0.6b
ROBOCO_LOCAL_LLM_MODEL=glm-5:cloud
ROBOCO_LOCAL_LLM_BASE_URL=http://roboco-ollama:11434/v1
ROBOCO_OLLAMA_BASE_URL=http://roboco-ollama:11434
```
## Docker Deployment
### Container Architecture
The system runs as Docker Compose services. All Dockerfiles live under `docker/` at the project root; every service uses `context: .` plus `dockerfile: docker/<name>.Dockerfile`.
| Service | Purpose | Healthcheck |
|---------|---------|-------------|
| `postgres` | PostgreSQL + pgvector | `pg_isready` |
| `redis` | Cache, sessions, event bus | `redis-cli ping` |
| `ollama` | Local LLM + embeddings | `ollama list` |
| `ollama-init` | Pulls models on startup | One-shot |
| `agent-base-image` / `agent-*-image` | Pre-built images spawned per agent | One-shot |
| `orchestrator` | API + agent spawner | Depends on all above |
| `panel` | Next.js control panel (internal, port 3000) | — |
| `nginx` | Reverse proxy fronting panel + orchestrator | — |
### Single Entry Point
`nginx` is the only externally-exposed service. It listens on `localhost:3000` and routes:
- `/api/*` and `/ws/*``orchestrator:8000`
- everything else → `panel:3000`
This avoids CORS since the browser sees one origin. The Next.js code uses relative URLs (`/api`, `/ws`) and lets nginx do the dispatch.
### WebSocket streams
The orchestrator exposes WebSocket endpoints under `/ws` (router in `roboco/api/websocket.py`, `ConnectionManager` + `broadcast_*` helpers):
| Endpoint | Purpose |
|----------|---------|
| `/ws/channels/{id}`, `/ws/agents/{id}`, `/ws/sessions/{id}`, `/ws/notifications/{id}` | Per-resource live streams |
| `/ws/system` | Operator/system-wide stream (no per-agent keying) — the rate-limit lifecycle (`RATE_LIMIT_HIT` / `RATE_LIMIT_LIFTED`) and live usage (`USAGE_SNAPSHOT`, pushed to the usage dashboard) |
Server-side events reach these sockets through `roboco/api/websocket_bridge.py`, which subscribes to the `StreamEventBus` and forwards each event to the matching connections. To add a new live event: define an `EventType` (dotted value), publish it to the bus, add a `_handle_*` forwarder in `websocket_bridge`, and consume it on the panel via the `useWebSocket("/<endpoint>", …)` hook — do not stand up a parallel endpoint or client stack.
### Rate limiting & usage
- **Provider rate limits** are tracked in Redis (`RateLimitStateTracker`, `roboco/services/gateway/`). On a provider 429 an agent calls `i_am_blocked(reason="rate_limited")`; the spawn gate then **queues** (never drops) further work for that provider, and a background probe-and-resume loop in the orchestrator clears the limit and revives parked agents when it lifts.
- **Provider overloads** reuse the same park-and-probe break. A persistent model-API overload (HTTP 529 / 500 / 503 — the SDK already retries transient ones) parks the provider exactly like a 429 instead of crash-retrying the agent straight back into the overload and burning tokens; the overload is detected orchestrator-side from the dead container's log markers, and the background loop revives the parked work when it recovers. Gated by `ROBOCO_OVERLOAD_BREAK_ENABLED` (default-on).
- **Token usage** is captured per agent session from the Claude Code transcript via the SDK server's `/usage/sync` (hook → orchestrator finalize → `agent_spawn_sessions``daily_usage_rollups` → dashboard). Cost uses provider-aware pricing in `roboco/billing/pricing.py` (Anthropic priced; local/Ollama intentionally `$0`). The token sweep also publishes `USAGE_SNAPSHOT` to `/ws/system`, so the dashboard's "Token Usage & Cost" panel updates live and falls back to HTTP polling when the stream is down.
### Startup Sequence
The startup order is critical due to dependencies:
```
postgres ──┐
redis ─────┼──> ollama ──> ollama-init ──> orchestrator ──> panel ──> nginx
│ │ │
│ │ └── Pulls qwen3-embedding:0.6b, glm-5:cloud
│ └── Healthcheck: ollama list
└── Healthcheck: pg_isready, redis-cli ping
```
**Important timing notes:**
1. `ollama-init` pulls models (~30s for embedding model, ~2min for LLM)
2. Orchestrator waits for models before starting
3. FastAPI lifespan indexes documents using Ollama (~30-60s)
4. Orchestrator polls `/health` until API is ready before starting dispatcher
5. After orchestrator is up, `panel` (Next.js) builds/starts, then `nginx`
### Database migrations
Schema changes ship as Alembic migrations under `alembic/versions/`. Run:
```bash
docker compose exec orchestrator alembic upgrade head
```
after pulling any change that adds a new migration.
### Ollama Configuration
Ollama provides two APIs:
- `/v1/*` - OpenAI-compatible API (for LLM chat/completion)
- `/api/*` - Native Ollama API (for embeddings, model management)
The embedder uses `/api/embed` endpoint with the `qwen3-embedding:0.6b` model.
**Environment variables for Docker:**
```bash
ROBOCO_LOCAL_LLM_BASE_URL=http://roboco-ollama:11434/v1 # OpenAI-compat
ROBOCO_OLLAMA_BASE_URL=http://roboco-ollama:11434 # Native API
```
### Common Issues
| Symptom | Cause | Fix |
|---------|-------|-----|
| `404 /api/embed` | Model not pulled | Check `docker logs roboco-ollama-init` |
| `All connection attempts failed` | API not ready | Orchestrator starts before FastAPI lifespan completes |
| Healthcheck failing | Wrong endpoint | Use `ollama list` not `curl` |
## Blueprint Reference
The organizational structure, communication matrix, role descriptions, and access-control model are documented inline above and in the user-facing documentation site (MkDocs Material; source under `docs/`, built by `mkdocs.yml`, deployed by `.github/workflows/docs.yml` via GitHub Pages Actions and served at rennf93.github.io/roboco). `docs/rag/` remains the agent-facing RAG corpus (excluded from the published site); the old root `usage.md` / `deployment.md` are now redirect stubs into the site.