Files
roboco/docs/rag/troubleshooting/task-errors.md
T
7f138d3bf5 [e4ed92d6] Video pipeline per-project requests, re-render action, composition preview (#403)
* [7f2c881a] Project-scope video pipeline + re-render + preview proxy (#386) (#396)

* [7f2c881a] feat(video): scope on-demand video requests + render loop to project_id

Require project_id on VideoRequestBody (404 when unresolvable or not
opted into the video engine), thread it through VideoEngine.open_video_task
via a shared resolve_authoring_project helper, and resolve the render
loop's motion/ workspace from the authoring task's own project_id instead
of the hardcoded self_heal_project_slug.

* [7f2c881a] fix(video): cast task.id to UUID before VideoEngine.rerender calls

mypy flagged task.id as sqlalchemy.sql.sqltypes.UUID[Any] rather than
uuid.UUID in the three rerender tests; cast to UUID per the codebase's
established idiom (cast("UUID", obj.id)) used elsewhere for the same
SQLAlchemy Mapped-attribute inference gap.

* [7f2c881a] docs(video): API endpoints for project-scoped requests, re-render, and preview proxy

Add comprehensive API documentation for the new project-scoped video engine endpoints:
- POST /api/video/request: on-demand video authoring scoped to project_id (breaking change)
- POST /api/video/pipeline/{task_id}/rerender: CEO-triggered re-render with idempotency key clearing
- GET /api/video/preview/{task_id}/{file_path}: CEO preview proxy with path-traversal confinement

Document project-scoping architecture: authoring tasks and render loop now resolve from task's own project_id instead of hardcoded self_heal_project_slug.

Add migration guide covering breaking change to VideoRequestBody schema (project_id now required), error handling changes (404 on unresolvable/non-opted-in projects), and client migration steps.

---------

Co-authored-by: Backend Developer 1 <be-dev-1@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: Backend Documenter <be-doc@roboco.tech>

* [8f959c3b] docs(ux_ui): add project picker, re-render control, and composition preview panel spec (#381) (#398)

Co-authored-by: UX/UI Developer 1 <ux-dev-1@roboco.tech>

* [1fb5b5cb] Project picker, re-render button, and composition preview panel (#397) (#402)

* [1fb5b5cb] feat(video): project picker, re-render button, and composition preview panel

* [1fb5b5cb] docs(video): add comprehensive guide for project picker, re-render button, and composition preview panel

---------

Co-authored-by: Frontend Developer 1 <fe-dev-1@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: Frontend Documenter <fe-doc@roboco.tech>

* [a512f364] Add video_engine_enabled to ProjectSummaryResponse (#412) (#414)

* [a512f364] feat(api): surface video_engine_enabled on ProjectSummaryResponse

* [a512f364] docs(api): document video_engine_enabled on ProjectSummaryResponse

---------

Co-authored-by: Backend Developer 1 <be-dev-1@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: Backend Documenter <be-doc@roboco.tech>

* [03607ab9] Fix re-render control gating/placement and project picker filter (#434)

* [f2f3e89f] Fix RerenderControl gating/placement across queue and strip views (#431)

* [f2f3e89f] feat(video): widen RerenderControl gating and share it across queue/strip views

Extracts RerenderControl into a shared panel/src/components/dashboard/
video-rerender-control.tsx component, widens its gate from
render_status === 'failed' to source_task_id + composition_id present
(matching what the backend rerender endpoint actually requires), adds a
confirm dialog before firing the mutation, and wires the same component
into video-pipeline-strip.tsx for still-in-flight rendering/render_failed
rows.

* [f2f3e89f] docs(video): enhance RerenderControl JSDoc with gating logic and usage examples

Add comprehensive JSDoc to the RerenderControl component covering its
purpose, gating logic (render for any source_task_id + composition_id,
regardless of render_status), three visual button states (idle/loading/
error), confirm-dialog guard behavior, and usage examples for both
video-post-queue.tsx and video-pipeline-strip.tsx contexts. Explains
why the backend's rerender endpoint doesn't require a failed render and
how the component prevents accidental re-renders.

---------

Co-authored-by: Frontend Developer 1 <fe-dev-1@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: Frontend Documenter <fe-doc@roboco.tech>

* [404d8ed3] Filter project picker to video-engine-enabled projects (#432)

* [404d8ed3] feat(panel): filter video-request project picker to opted-in projects

Add video_engine_enabled to the client ProjectSummary type, give
ProjectSelector a videoEngineOnly filter prop, default RequestVideoDialog's
picker to the current video-enabled project with a friendly empty-state
when none exist, and cover the filter with a new project-selector test.

* [404d8ed3] docs(panel): add ProjectSelector component API reference with videoEngineOnly filter

Document the reusable ProjectSelector component with its props, filtering behavior,
and new videoEngineOnly filter for video-engine-enabled projects. Follows the
existing component documentation pattern from page-refresh-provider.

---------

Co-authored-by: Frontend Developer 2 <fe-dev-2@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: Frontend Documenter <fe-doc@roboco.tech>

* [519a4088] fix(panel): import missing RerenderControl in video-post-queue and correct stale doc (#436)

Co-authored-by: Frontend Developer 1 <fe-dev-1@roboco.tech>

---------

Co-authored-by: Frontend Developer 1 <fe-dev-1@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: Frontend Documenter <fe-doc@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: Frontend Developer 2 <fe-dev-2@roboco.tech>

* [8e912c3e] Reflow hard-wrapped video UX design doc to pass quality gate (#439)

* [ccfe2015] docs(ux_ui): reflow video request composition-controls spec to one line per paragraph (#438)

Co-authored-by: UX/UI Developer 1 <ux-dev-1@roboco.tech>

* [99c3ed9c] docs(backend): reflow hard-wrapped prose in video-engine-endpoints.md and video-project-scoping.md (#442)

Co-authored-by: UX/UI Developer 1 <ux-dev-1@roboco.tech>

* [c2e98fc0] docs(backend): strip stray trailing whitespace in video-engine-endpoints.md fence (#451)

Co-authored-by: UX/UI Developer 1 <ux-dev-1@roboco.tech>

* [9c7bc11a] Reflow all 3 hard-wrapped docs on this branch and verify quality gate (#457)

* [9c7bc11a] test(scripts): guard reflow_md.py --check wiring into make quality

* [9c7bc11a] docs(standards): document markdown reflow quality gate workflow and verification

Added comprehensive guide explaining the one-logical-unit-per-line markdown prose standard, how the reflow check integrates into make quality, the three reflowed files (video-engine-endpoints.md, video-project-scoping.md, composition-controls spec), and the regression test added to ensure wiring stability. This task verifies all three ACs are satisfied: reflow_md.py --check exits 0, make quality passes (non-DB portions), and the three files are whitespace-only reflowed.

---------

Co-authored-by: UX/UI Developer 1 <ux-dev-1@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: UX/UI Documenter <ux-doc@roboco.tech>

---------

Co-authored-by: UX/UI Developer 1 <ux-dev-1@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: UX/UI Documenter <ux-doc@roboco.tech>

* [002f0cdd] docs(rag): document reflow-check zero-diff troubleshooting path (#459) (#460)

Co-authored-by: Backend Developer 1 <be-dev-1@roboco.tech>

* [e4ed92d6] fix rerender missing-task test — assert the empty queue it creates

The test never seeds; the trailing assertion expected a phantom video
post. Broken since the branch's first commit but never executed — every
earlier CI run short-circuited at a pre-pytest gate step.

---------

Co-authored-by: Backend Developer 1 <be-dev-1@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: Backend Documenter <be-doc@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: UX/UI Developer 1 <ux-dev-1@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: Frontend Developer 1 <fe-dev-1@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: Frontend Documenter <fe-doc@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: Frontend Developer 2 <fe-dev-2@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: UX/UI Documenter <ux-doc@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: Renn F <rennf93@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-11 07:39:17 +02:00

124 lines
5.3 KiB
Markdown

# Task Error Troubleshooting
## Cannot Claim Task
**Error**: "Task cannot be claimed"
**Causes**:
1. Task not in claimable status for your role
2. Task already assigned to someone else
3. Wrong role for this task type
**Solutions**:
- Check what's actionable for you: `give_me_work()` (or `triage()` for PMs)
- Verify your role can claim from the task's current status
- Contact PM if task needs reassignment
**Claimable Status by Role**:
| Role | Can Claim From | Verb |
|------|----------------|------|
| Developer | pending, needs_revision | `i_will_work_on(task_id)` |
| QA | awaiting_qa | `claim_review(task_id)` |
| Documenter | pending, awaiting_documentation | `claim_doc_task(task_id)` |
| Cell PM / Main PM | pending | `i_will_plan(task_id)` |
## Wrong Team
**Error**: "team 'X' may not act on a 'Y' task (team-based restriction)" (`not_authorized`)
**Cause**: You are a cell-scoped role (developer, QA, documenter, cell PM) and the task belongs to another team. Claim, resume, unblock, and activate are all team-matched.
**Solutions**:
- Follow the envelope's `remediate`: call `give_me_work()` to find a task in your own team
- If the task was misrouted to you, leave it — the pool re-routes it to the right team
Org-wide roles (Main PM, Board, CEO, PR reviewer) are exempt — they act across cells by design.
## Cannot Start Task
**Error**: "Cannot transition to in_progress"
**Causes**:
1. Task not claimed by you
2. Task in wrong status
**Solutions**:
- Claim + start in one step: `i_will_work_on(task_id, plan="...")` (devs), `claim_review(task_id)` (QA), `claim_doc_task(task_id)` (doc), or `i_will_plan(task_id, plan, approach)` (PMs)
- Check current status
Note: Git branches are auto-created on claim, no waiting needed.
## Cannot Submit for QA
**Error**: "Invalid transition from current status"
**Causes**:
1. Task not in `in_progress` or `verifying`
2. Missing required fields
**Solutions**:
- Move through verification first
- Ensure task is actively being worked
## Self-Review Prevented
**Error**: "Cannot review own work" or "SELF_REVIEW_NOT_ALLOWED"
**Cause**: QA trying to claim, pass, or fail a task they originally developed
**Solution**: Another QA must handle this task. Self-review prevention applies to:
- Claiming the task (`claim_review`)
- Passing QA (`pass`)
- Failing QA (`fail`)
## Cannot Escalate Subtask to CEO
**Error**: "Cannot escalate subtask to CEO - only parent tasks can be escalated"
**Cause**: Attempting to escalate a task that has a `parent_task_id`
**Solution**: Escalate the parent task instead. Find the parent task ID (it's on the subtask's `parent_task_id` field, surfaced in your `give_me_work()` / `triage()` envelope), then escalate the parent:
```python
escalate_to_ceo(task_id=parent_id, reason="...")
```
`escalate_to_ceo` is Main PM / Board only; Cell PMs and cell members use `escalate_up(task_id, reason)` instead.
## Git Task: Parent Branch Required
**Error**: "Parent task must be claimed first to create its branch"
**Cause**: Trying to claim a subtask when parent task hasn't been claimed yet
**Solution**: Parent task must be claimed first. Branches are auto-created hierarchically:
1. Parent is claimed → parent branch created
2. Then subtask can be claimed → subtask branch created (forked from parent)
## Task Has Incomplete Subtasks
**Error**: "Cannot complete task - subtasks not finished" with list of task IDs
**Cause**: Trying to complete a parent task while subtasks are still in progress
**Solution**: The error message includes which subtask IDs are blocking. Either:
1. Complete the blocking subtasks first (drive them through QA → docs → `complete(task_id, notes)`)
2. Cancel them if no longer needed (PM/CEO only — cancellation is not an agent verb; ask your PM)
## Reflow/Formatting Task Has Zero Diff
**Symptom**: A task asks you to reflow specific markdown file(s) so they pass `make reflow-check`, but `python3 scripts/reflow_md.py --check` already reports "OK" with no changes, so there is no diff to commit — and `i_am_done` hard-requires at least one commit.
**Cause**: `scripts/reflow_md.py` walks the whole repo tree (`ROOT.rglob("*.md")`) on every invocation; it does not scope to positional file-path arguments passed on the command line, so `--check docs/foo.md` and a bare `--check` do the same repo-wide scan. If the target file(s) were already reflowed upstream (e.g. in an earlier commit on the same branch chain), the task is satisfied-by-upstream with a structurally empty diff.
**Solution**: Verify with the repo-wide check (not a scoped one, since scoping is a no-op) and record the zero-diff finding in a `decision` journal entry. If the task's acceptance criteria are already met with nothing left to change in the named files, do not keep re-running the same check — escalate once with the concrete verification so a PM can either stamp the task as satisfied-by-upstream/cancel it, or direct a small verification commit outside the target file(s) to satisfy the commit gate.
## Invalid Task Status for Operation
**Error**: "Task is in [status], expected [expected_status]"
**Cause**: Attempting an operation that's not valid for the current task state
**Solution**: Check the task's current status and follow the correct workflow:
- QA operations require `awaiting_qa` status
- Documentation operations require `awaiting_documentation` status
- PM completion requires `awaiting_pm_review` status