mirror of
https://github.com/rennf93/roboco.git
synced 2026-08-03 07:23:24 +02:00
* feat(goals): company charter singleton — data layer (Business Goals slice 1)
First slice of the company-in-a-box "Business Goals" phase: a single CEO-owned
charter row (north star + objectives + constraints + operating policy) that
will be injected into every agent's context_briefing so all work is goal-aware.
- CompanyGoalsTable: singleton table (all-zeros id), JSON objectives /
constraints / operating_policy, updated_at / updated_by.
- migration 032: create + seed the singleton row (offline-renderable; column
server-defaults fill an INSERT of just the id).
- CompanyGoalsService: get() (empty defaults when unset) + upsert() (singleton,
partial update, caller commits).
- tests: empty defaults, roundtrip, singleton + partial-update preservation.
Next slices (mapped, not yet built): briefing injection (BriefingInputs +
build_context_briefing + EvidenceRepo), API route (GET any / PUT CEO-only),
panel /goals page, and base/Board/PM prompt mentions.
* feat(goals): inject the company charter into every agent briefing (slice 2)
The charter is now goal-aware context for every agent:
- BriefingInputs gains company_goals; build_context_briefing surfaces it.
- EvidenceRepo.company_goals(): single-row lookup returning a COMPACT charter
(north star + objectives + constraints + operating policy; audit columns
dropped, lists capped) or None when unset, so an empty charter never bloats
the per-verb briefing.
- _briefing_for wires it into every context_briefing.
Tests: briefing surfaces company_goals (defaults None); repo returns None for an
absent/empty charter and the compact dict when set.
* feat(goals): company charter API — GET any agent, PUT CEO-only (slice 3)
- routes/company_goals.py: GET returns the charter (any authenticated agent —
it drives every briefing); PUT is CEO-only (403 otherwise), partial update via
model_dump(exclude_unset=True), explicit commit.
- schemas/company_goals.py: response + partial-update models.
- registered at /api/company-goals.
- tests: GET open to any role, CEO update persists + is readable, non-CEO 403.
* feat(goals): make the company charter actionable in agent prompts (slice 5)
Agents already receive company_goals in the briefing (slice 2); now tell them to
act on it:
- base.md: universal "Align with the company charter" section — favour work and
trade-offs that advance the objectives, honour the constraints, flag conflicts;
never a license to leave your role.
- board / main_pm / cell_pm: role-specific lines tying triage / cell-routing /
subtask decomposition to the charter.
Prompts are composed at spawn from base.md + roles/*.md directly (compose_prompt),
so no _generated regeneration is needed.
* feat(goals): company charter panel page (slice 4)
CEO-facing editor for the charter at /company-goals:
- lib/api/company-goals.ts: get / update (PUT) client.
- company-goals-card.tsx: edit north star + constraints (one per line) +
objectives / operating_policy (JSON, parsed + validated with toast errors);
display derives from server state (no set-state-in-effect).
- (dashboard)/company-goals/page.tsx + a "Company Goals" sidebar nav link.
tsc --noEmit + eslint clean. Completes Phase 1 (Business Goals): data, briefing
injection, API, prompts, panel.
* fix(test): make test_app route assertions robust to FastAPI 0.137 _IncludedRouter
FastAPI 0.137 stopped flattening include_router into app.routes — each include is
now an _IncludedRouter (a BaseRoute with no .path), so `{r.path for r in
app.routes}` raised AttributeError and the two router-registration tests failed
(the bump arrived via the claude-agent-sdk update in uv.lock). Add
_registered_paths(): OpenAPI schema paths (the stable public contract) plus each
included router's prefix, which also covers the websocket /ws mount (never in the
schema). Drops the now-incorrect type: ignore[attr-defined].
* feat(research): pluggable web search/fetch for Board + PM agents
Add a provider-agnostic web-research capability so the Board and PMs can
ground decisions in current external evidence the knowledge base can't
answer.
- ResearchService selects a provider adapter from config: Tavily, Brave,
and Exa adapters plus a NullProvider that degrades gracefully when no
key is set. Result count and fetched-content size are clamped to caps.
- /api/research/search and /api/research/fetch: role-gated to Board + PMs
(and the CEO), with a per-agent/day Redis quota that fails open.
- roboco-search MCP server (web_search / web_fetch) calls those routes;
the provider key stays server-side and agent containers never egress.
Mounted per role by the orchestrator, behind a master switch.
- Charter-aware prompt guidance for Board, Main PM, and Cell PM.
Additive: with no key configured it is a no-op and the existing delivery
lifecycle is unchanged.
* feat(pitch): Board pitch -> CEO approve -> auto-provision repos
Add an additive origination path so a product can be proposed, approved,
and stood up without manual repo/Project setup.
- Pitch entity + migration (pitches table); PitchService create/list/
reject/approve.
- GitHubProvisioningService: the one place that creates repos (POST
/orgs/{org}/repos). Server-side token/org; when unconfigured the whole
approve path is inert and nothing is created.
- On approval: provision one repo per target cell, register a Project per
repo, create a Product when multi-cell, and seed one Main-PM delivery
task — all reusing the existing Product / coordination-task machinery.
- /api/pitches: Board authors (PO/HoM), CEO approves/rejects, Board+PM+CEO
view. Errors mapped via a single translator.
Additive: the delivery lifecycle is untouched; with no provisioning token
the capability is a no-op. Agent-facing pitch tool + panel are follow-ups.
* feat(strategy): dormant autonomous strategy engine (engine 2)
Add a second, optional engine that watches the company against its
standing goals and surfaces what needs the CEO — without touching the
delivery lifecycle (engine 1).
- StrategyEngine.assess() reports observations: the company is idle while
goals stand, and tasks stranded in 'blocked' past a threshold.
- run_cycle() notifies the CEO (notify-only; it never spends, builds, or
auto-approves — originating work stays a CEO decision).
- Orchestrator runs it on its own interval, started/stopped with the other
background loops; the loop returns immediately unless enabled.
DORMANT by default (strategy_engine_enabled=False): the loop never runs and
a standard deployment is unchanged. Auto-origination is a further opt-in.
* docs(changelog): record Business Goals, Web Research, Pitch->Provision, and the dormant strategy engine under Unreleased
* feat(secretary): wire the Secretary role end-to-end (foundation)
Add SECRETARY as a distinct role — the CEO's conversational chief-of-staff,
governed separately from the Prompter (which stays read-only/human-only).
This is the role foundation only; authority, the live agent, and the panel
land in following commits.
- foundation/identity: Role.SECRETARY (board level), seeded secretary-1 agent,
role-level mapping.
- journaling read tier (ALL — it advises the CEO), role_config entry,
per-role model (opus), prompt-layer mapping + roles/secretary.md.
- i_am_idle gains SECRETARY so the role has a verb surface.
- migration 034: add 'secretary' to the agentrole enum (mirrors 025).
- Role-registry tests updated for the new role.
Inert by itself (nothing spawns it yet); additive — existing roles unchanged.
* feat(secretary): directives + gate-list authority (backend)
The Secretary acts only under CEO command. Low-risk directives (relay a
dictated message) execute immediately; high-impact ones — charter edits,
task start/cancel/override, pitch approval, announcements — are recorded
pending and run only after the CEO confirms (the gate list).
- secretary_directives table (migration 035) as the command audit + queue.
- SecretaryService: read company state; submit (direct->run, gated->queue +
notify CEO); confirm/reject; execution runs with the CEO as actor through
the existing services (the Secretary never holds CEO authority itself).
- /api/secretary: submit + state/task reads (Secretary or CEO); list/confirm/
reject (CEO only). Writes commit explicitly.
* feat(secretary): live conversational agent (container + bridge)
Stand up the Secretary as a persistent Claude-SDK container the CEO chats
with, mirroring the Intake agent and reusing its driver/session machinery.
- secretary_driver: build_secretary_options exposes read_company_state /
read_task / submit_directive as SDK tools that call /api/secretary/* with
the agent's HMAC token; backend-call logic is module-level + tested.
- secretary_main: container entrypoint (receiver + relay) reusing IntakeDriver.
- orchestrator: start/spawn/reap secretary session + run-cmd builder; no
workspace clone (reads state via API), mints a role=secretary token.
- secretary_live routes: panel <-> container bridge over the live registry.
- agent-secretary image (Dockerfile + compose build service).
Inert until a session is started; additive — intake and all agents unchanged.
* feat(secretary): panel chat + directive confirmation queue
The CEO's Secretary surface: a live chat (SSE) to talk to the Secretary, and
a 'Needs your confirmation' queue listing gated directives the Secretary
proposed — each with Confirm / Reject. Adds the sidebar nav entry.
- lib/api/secretary.ts: live (start/stream/status/send/stop) + directive
(list/confirm/reject) + state clients (all as the CEO).
- hooks/use-secretary.ts: drives one chat, accumulating SSE token deltas.
- secretary page: chat pane + pending-directive cards.
Completes the Secretary end-to-end (role + authority + live agent + panel).
* feat(pitch): agent-facing pitch tool + pitches panel
Complete the pitch path: the Board can now author pitches through the gateway,
and the CEO reviews/approves them in the panel.
- content_actions.pitch (Board-only) -> PitchService.create, returning an
Envelope; wired as a do-tool (do_server + /api/v1/do/pitch + schema) and
added to the Board's do-tools.
- Panel /pitches page: lists pitches with CEO Approve & provision / Reject;
sidebar nav entry.
Pitch (Phase 4) is now end-to-end: author -> CEO approve -> auto-provision.
* feat(cockpit): read-only 'is the business winning?' summary
A pure aggregation for the CEO over existing data — no new state, no writes.
- CockpitService.summary(): charter north-star/objectives, delivery counts
(in-flight/blocked/awaiting-CEO), 30-day spend vs the charter's budget cap,
pending pitches, and the strategy engine's signals (what needs you). Stamped
basis='proxy' — performance is a proxy until real launches.
- GET /api/cockpit/summary (CEO / Board / Main PM / Secretary).
- Panel /cockpit page + sidebar nav.
Reuses goals + usage + StrategyEngine.assess(); reads only.
* docs(changelog): add the Secretary and Cockpit to Unreleased
* fix(test): isolate the company-goals empty-defaults test from committed state
The shared test DB persists committed writes across tests; a route test
commits a charter, so the unit test's 'unset' assertion must establish its
own clean precondition rather than assume global emptiness.
* fix(gateway): lower evidence_repo complexity to rank A (xenon gate)
company_goals()'s 4-way `or` emptiness check tipped the module average to
rank B; `any(...)` is equivalent and keeps the module under the gate's A bar.
* chore(compose): mirror agent-secretary-image build into docker-compose.yaml
Both compose files are byte-identical and tracked; .yaml carries the same
agent-secretary-image build service already present in docker-compose.yml.
* chore(lifecycle): regenerate artifacts for secretary i_am_idle
The secretary role gained i_am_idle in the lifecycle spec; regenerate the
generated prompt/doc/json artifacts so foundation-check stays green.
* docs(changelog): cut the company-in-a-box phases to 0.4.0
Label the six additive phases (business goals, web research, pitch-provision,
strategy engine, secretary, cockpit) as 0.4.0; tag v0.4.0 is held until the
branch merges to master so it points at the release commit.
---------
Co-authored-by: Renn F <rennf93@users.noreply.github.com>
717 lines
25 KiB
Python
717 lines
25 KiB
Python
"""Tier 1 — spec self-tests. Fast (no DB, no network)."""
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
from types import SimpleNamespace
|
|
from typing import Any
|
|
from uuid import uuid4
|
|
|
|
import pytest
|
|
from roboco.foundation import _validate_lifecycle as _validate
|
|
from roboco.foundation._validate_lifecycle import reachable_from
|
|
from roboco.foundation.policy import lifecycle as spec
|
|
from roboco.foundation.policy.lifecycle import _INTENT_VERBS, IntentSpec
|
|
from roboco.models.base import TaskType as ModelTaskType
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_role_enum_has_every_pre_gateway_role() -> None:
|
|
"""Every role from PERMISSIONS.md must be enumerated.
|
|
|
|
The canonical Role enum is now defined in `roboco.foundation.identity`
|
|
and re-exported here. It includes the 9 pre-gateway roles plus the
|
|
SYSTEM sentinel used for orchestrator-generated rows. The pre-gateway
|
|
PERMISSIONS.md is the historical canon — SYSTEM is the post-foundation
|
|
addition that doesn't appear in policy tables.
|
|
"""
|
|
expected = {
|
|
"developer",
|
|
"qa",
|
|
"documenter",
|
|
"cell_pm",
|
|
"main_pm",
|
|
"product_owner",
|
|
"head_marketing",
|
|
"auditor",
|
|
"prompter", # post-gateway intake role (human-only, drafts tasks)
|
|
"secretary", # CEO's chief-of-staff (human-only, gated CEO authority)
|
|
"ceo",
|
|
"system",
|
|
}
|
|
actual = {r.value for r in spec.Role}
|
|
assert actual == expected, f"Role enum drift: {actual ^ expected}"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_status_enum_has_every_pre_gateway_status() -> None:
|
|
"""Every status from STATUS_TRANSITIONS.md must be enumerated."""
|
|
expected = {
|
|
"backlog",
|
|
"pending",
|
|
"claimed",
|
|
"in_progress",
|
|
"blocked",
|
|
"paused",
|
|
"verifying",
|
|
"awaiting_qa",
|
|
"needs_revision",
|
|
"awaiting_documentation",
|
|
"awaiting_pm_review",
|
|
"awaiting_ceo_approval",
|
|
"completed",
|
|
"cancelled",
|
|
}
|
|
actual = {s.value for s in spec.Status}
|
|
assert actual == expected, f"Status enum drift: {actual ^ expected}"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_task_type_enum_matches_models() -> None:
|
|
"""The spec's TaskType must match the existing models.base.TaskType.
|
|
|
|
If the existing model adds/removes a type, the spec must be updated
|
|
in lockstep — that's the entire point of this module.
|
|
"""
|
|
spec_values = {t.value for t in spec.TaskType}
|
|
model_values = {t.value for t in ModelTaskType}
|
|
assert spec_values == model_values, (
|
|
f"TaskType drift between lifecycle.spec and models.base: "
|
|
f"{spec_values ^ model_values}"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_decision_allow_has_no_rejection_kind() -> None:
|
|
d = spec.Decision.allow()
|
|
assert d.allowed is True
|
|
assert d.rejection_kind is None
|
|
assert d.message is None
|
|
assert d.missing == []
|
|
assert d.remediate is None
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_decision_reject_requires_rejection_kind() -> None:
|
|
d = spec.Decision.reject(
|
|
kind="not_authorized",
|
|
message="role 'developer' may not call delegate",
|
|
remediate="only PMs delegate; call give_me_work() instead",
|
|
)
|
|
assert d.allowed is False
|
|
assert d.rejection_kind == "not_authorized"
|
|
assert d.message == "role 'developer' may not call delegate"
|
|
assert d.remediate == "only PMs delegate; call give_me_work() instead"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_decision_tracing_gap_carries_missing_list() -> None:
|
|
d = spec.Decision.tracing_gap(
|
|
missing=["plan", "journal:decision"],
|
|
remediate="provide plan and a journal:decision entry",
|
|
)
|
|
assert d.allowed is False
|
|
assert d.rejection_kind == "tracing_gap"
|
|
assert d.missing == ["plan", "journal:decision"]
|
|
assert d.remediate == "provide plan and a journal:decision entry"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_decision_tracing_gap_defensively_copies_missing() -> None:
|
|
"""tracing_gap must isolate the stored list from the caller's source."""
|
|
src = ["plan"]
|
|
d = spec.Decision.tracing_gap(missing=src, remediate="r")
|
|
src.append("mutated")
|
|
assert d.missing == ["plan"]
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_decision_invariants_enforced_at_construction() -> None:
|
|
"""allowed=True ⇒ rejection_kind None; allowed=False ⇒ kind set."""
|
|
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="allowed=True requires rejection_kind=None"):
|
|
spec.Decision(
|
|
allowed=True,
|
|
rejection_kind="not_authorized",
|
|
message="x",
|
|
missing=[],
|
|
remediate="x",
|
|
)
|
|
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="allowed=False requires rejection_kind"):
|
|
spec.Decision(
|
|
allowed=False,
|
|
rejection_kind=None,
|
|
message="x",
|
|
missing=[],
|
|
remediate="x",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_decision_invariant_rejects_allowed_with_missing_or_remediate() -> None:
|
|
"""allowed=True with missing or remediate set raises (Fix 1 lock-in)."""
|
|
with pytest.raises(
|
|
ValueError, match="allowed=True requires missing=\\[\\] and remediate=None"
|
|
):
|
|
spec.Decision(
|
|
allowed=True,
|
|
rejection_kind=None,
|
|
message=None,
|
|
missing=["plan"],
|
|
remediate=None,
|
|
)
|
|
with pytest.raises(
|
|
ValueError,
|
|
match="allowed=True requires missing=\\[\\] and remediate=None",
|
|
):
|
|
spec.Decision(
|
|
allowed=True,
|
|
rejection_kind=None,
|
|
message=None,
|
|
missing=[],
|
|
remediate="oops",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_precondition_check_returns_bool() -> None:
|
|
"""A Precondition.check() is the gate-table evaluator."""
|
|
p = spec.Precondition(
|
|
key="commits>=1",
|
|
check=lambda task, _agent, _ctx: bool(getattr(task, "commits", None)),
|
|
remediate="commit at least once before opening a PR",
|
|
missing_token="commits>=1",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
task_with = SimpleNamespace(commits=["abc"])
|
|
task_without = SimpleNamespace(commits=[])
|
|
assert p.check(task_with, None, None) is True
|
|
assert p.check(task_without, None, None) is False
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_action_spec_holds_role_status_and_precondition_data() -> None:
|
|
a = spec.ActionSpec(
|
|
name="claim",
|
|
allowed_roles=frozenset({spec.Role.DEVELOPER}),
|
|
source_statuses=frozenset({spec.Status.PENDING, spec.Status.NEEDS_REVISION}),
|
|
target_status=spec.Status.CLAIMED,
|
|
allowed_task_types=None,
|
|
preconditions=(),
|
|
self_review_block=False,
|
|
needs_team_match=True,
|
|
)
|
|
assert a.name == "claim"
|
|
assert spec.Role.DEVELOPER in a.allowed_roles
|
|
assert a.target_status == spec.Status.CLAIMED
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_intent_spec_composes_atomic_actions() -> None:
|
|
i = spec.IntentSpec(
|
|
name="i_will_work_on",
|
|
allowed_roles=frozenset({spec.Role.DEVELOPER}),
|
|
description="Claim a task and start work on it.",
|
|
composes=("claim", "set_plan", "start"),
|
|
extra_preconditions=(),
|
|
side_effects=(),
|
|
next_hint=lambda _t: "edit + commit, then open_pr",
|
|
)
|
|
assert i.composes == ("claim", "set_plan", "start")
|
|
assert i.next_hint(None) == "edit + commit, then open_pr"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_status_transition_carries_role_constraint_optional() -> None:
|
|
t = spec.StatusTransition(
|
|
source=spec.Status.AWAITING_QA,
|
|
target=spec.Status.AWAITING_DOCUMENTATION,
|
|
triggered_by_action="qa_pass",
|
|
role_constraint=frozenset({spec.Role.QA}),
|
|
)
|
|
assert t.source == spec.Status.AWAITING_QA
|
|
assert t.target == spec.Status.AWAITING_DOCUMENTATION
|
|
assert t.triggered_by_action == "qa_pass"
|
|
assert t.role_constraint == frozenset({spec.Role.QA})
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_status_transitions_includes_dev_path() -> None:
|
|
"""The dev happy path: pending → claimed → in_progress → verifying → awaiting_qa."""
|
|
sources = {(t.source, t.target) for t in spec._STATUS_TRANSITIONS}
|
|
assert (spec.Status.PENDING, spec.Status.CLAIMED) in sources
|
|
assert (spec.Status.CLAIMED, spec.Status.IN_PROGRESS) in sources
|
|
assert (spec.Status.IN_PROGRESS, spec.Status.VERIFYING) in sources
|
|
assert (spec.Status.VERIFYING, spec.Status.AWAITING_QA) in sources
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_status_transitions_includes_qa_paths() -> None:
|
|
sources = {(t.source, t.target) for t in spec._STATUS_TRANSITIONS}
|
|
assert (spec.Status.AWAITING_QA, spec.Status.CLAIMED) in sources # QA claims
|
|
assert (spec.Status.AWAITING_QA, spec.Status.AWAITING_DOCUMENTATION) in sources
|
|
assert (spec.Status.AWAITING_QA, spec.Status.NEEDS_REVISION) in sources
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_status_transitions_includes_ceo_paths() -> None:
|
|
sources = {(t.source, t.target) for t in spec._STATUS_TRANSITIONS}
|
|
assert (spec.Status.AWAITING_PM_REVIEW, spec.Status.COMPLETED) in sources
|
|
assert (
|
|
spec.Status.AWAITING_PM_REVIEW,
|
|
spec.Status.AWAITING_CEO_APPROVAL,
|
|
) in sources
|
|
assert (spec.Status.AWAITING_CEO_APPROVAL, spec.Status.COMPLETED) in sources
|
|
assert (spec.Status.AWAITING_CEO_APPROVAL, spec.Status.NEEDS_REVISION) in sources
|
|
# A blocked task the PM cannot resolve can also be surfaced to the CEO.
|
|
assert (spec.Status.BLOCKED, spec.Status.AWAITING_CEO_APPROVAL) in sources
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_status_transitions_includes_block_pause_paths() -> None:
|
|
sources = {(t.source, t.target) for t in spec._STATUS_TRANSITIONS}
|
|
assert (spec.Status.IN_PROGRESS, spec.Status.BLOCKED) in sources
|
|
assert (spec.Status.IN_PROGRESS, spec.Status.PAUSED) in sources
|
|
assert (spec.Status.BLOCKED, spec.Status.IN_PROGRESS) in sources
|
|
assert (spec.Status.PAUSED, spec.Status.IN_PROGRESS) in sources
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_every_non_terminal_status_can_be_cancelled() -> None:
|
|
"""PERMISSIONS.md says PM/CEO can cancel from any state."""
|
|
cancellable = {
|
|
t.source for t in spec._STATUS_TRANSITIONS if t.target == spec.Status.CANCELLED
|
|
}
|
|
non_terminal = set(spec.Status) - {spec.Status.COMPLETED, spec.Status.CANCELLED}
|
|
assert non_terminal <= cancellable, (
|
|
f"Statuses missing a cancel transition: {non_terminal - cancellable}"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_status_graph_lookup_returns_targets() -> None:
|
|
"""STATUS_GRAPH is a quick `source -> {targets}` lookup."""
|
|
assert spec.Status.CLAIMED in spec.STATUS_GRAPH[spec.Status.PENDING]
|
|
assert spec.Status.AWAITING_QA in spec.STATUS_GRAPH[spec.Status.VERIFYING]
|
|
assert spec.STATUS_GRAPH[spec.Status.COMPLETED] == frozenset()
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_status_transitions_role_constraints_match_canon() -> None:
|
|
"""role_constraint must encode the per-row role gates from
|
|
PERMISSIONS.md / STATUS_TRANSITIONS.md exactly. Tests that look only
|
|
at (source, target) pairs miss role-typo regressions; this test
|
|
pins the gates explicitly.
|
|
"""
|
|
by_pair = {
|
|
(t.source, t.target, t.triggered_by_action): t.role_constraint
|
|
for t in spec._STATUS_TRANSITIONS
|
|
}
|
|
# QA is the only role that can claim awaiting_qa
|
|
assert by_pair[
|
|
(spec.Status.AWAITING_QA, spec.Status.CLAIMED, "claim")
|
|
] == frozenset({spec.Role.QA})
|
|
# Documenter is the only role that can claim awaiting_documentation
|
|
assert by_pair[
|
|
(spec.Status.AWAITING_DOCUMENTATION, spec.Status.CLAIMED, "claim")
|
|
] == frozenset({spec.Role.DOCUMENTER})
|
|
# qa_pass / qa_fail: QA only
|
|
assert by_pair[
|
|
(spec.Status.AWAITING_QA, spec.Status.AWAITING_DOCUMENTATION, "qa_pass")
|
|
] == frozenset({spec.Role.QA})
|
|
assert by_pair[
|
|
(spec.Status.AWAITING_QA, spec.Status.NEEDS_REVISION, "qa_fail")
|
|
] == frozenset({spec.Role.QA})
|
|
# docs_complete: documenter only
|
|
assert by_pair[
|
|
(
|
|
spec.Status.AWAITING_DOCUMENTATION,
|
|
spec.Status.AWAITING_PM_REVIEW,
|
|
"docs_complete",
|
|
)
|
|
] == frozenset({spec.Role.DOCUMENTER})
|
|
# PM complete: cell + main PM (not board, not CEO)
|
|
assert by_pair[
|
|
(spec.Status.AWAITING_PM_REVIEW, spec.Status.COMPLETED, "complete")
|
|
] == frozenset({spec.Role.CELL_PM, spec.Role.MAIN_PM})
|
|
# escalate_to_ceo: main_pm + product_owner + head_marketing — from a
|
|
# completed review and from a blocked task, same role gate.
|
|
escalate_roles = frozenset(
|
|
{
|
|
spec.Role.MAIN_PM,
|
|
spec.Role.PRODUCT_OWNER,
|
|
spec.Role.HEAD_MARKETING,
|
|
}
|
|
)
|
|
assert (
|
|
by_pair[
|
|
(
|
|
spec.Status.AWAITING_PM_REVIEW,
|
|
spec.Status.AWAITING_CEO_APPROVAL,
|
|
"escalate_to_ceo",
|
|
)
|
|
]
|
|
== escalate_roles
|
|
)
|
|
assert (
|
|
by_pair[
|
|
(
|
|
spec.Status.BLOCKED,
|
|
spec.Status.AWAITING_CEO_APPROVAL,
|
|
"escalate_to_ceo",
|
|
)
|
|
]
|
|
== escalate_roles
|
|
)
|
|
# CEO actions: CEO only
|
|
assert by_pair[
|
|
(spec.Status.AWAITING_CEO_APPROVAL, spec.Status.COMPLETED, "ceo_approve")
|
|
] == frozenset({spec.Role.CEO})
|
|
assert by_pair[
|
|
(spec.Status.AWAITING_CEO_APPROVAL, spec.Status.NEEDS_REVISION, "ceo_reject")
|
|
] == frozenset({spec.Role.CEO})
|
|
# Cancel: PM + CEO from any non-terminal status
|
|
cancel_constraint = frozenset({spec.Role.CELL_PM, spec.Role.MAIN_PM, spec.Role.CEO})
|
|
for src in spec.Status:
|
|
if src in (spec.Status.COMPLETED, spec.Status.CANCELLED):
|
|
continue
|
|
assert by_pair[(src, spec.Status.CANCELLED, "cancel")] == cancel_constraint, (
|
|
f"cancel from {src.value} has wrong role_constraint"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_atomic_action_table_has_pre_gateway_actions() -> None:
|
|
"""Every task tool from PERMISSIONS.md must have an ActionSpec."""
|
|
expected = {
|
|
"activate",
|
|
"claim",
|
|
"start",
|
|
"set_plan",
|
|
"block",
|
|
"unblock",
|
|
"pause",
|
|
"resume",
|
|
"submit_verification",
|
|
"submit_qa",
|
|
"qa_pass",
|
|
"qa_fail",
|
|
"docs_complete",
|
|
"complete",
|
|
"submit_pm_review",
|
|
"escalate_to_ceo",
|
|
"ceo_approve",
|
|
"ceo_reject",
|
|
"cancel",
|
|
"create_subtask",
|
|
}
|
|
assert expected <= set(spec._ATOMIC_ACTIONS), (
|
|
f"Missing ActionSpec entries: {expected - set(spec._ATOMIC_ACTIONS)}"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_claim_action_allows_developer_from_pending() -> None:
|
|
a = spec._ATOMIC_ACTIONS["claim"]
|
|
assert spec.Role.DEVELOPER in a.allowed_roles
|
|
assert spec.Status.PENDING in a.source_statuses
|
|
assert a.target_status == spec.Status.CLAIMED
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_qa_pass_self_review_blocks() -> None:
|
|
"""A QA cannot qa_pass a task they themselves committed to."""
|
|
assert spec._ATOMIC_ACTIONS["qa_pass"].self_review_block is True
|
|
assert spec._ATOMIC_ACTIONS["qa_fail"].self_review_block is True
|
|
assert spec._ATOMIC_ACTIONS["docs_complete"].self_review_block is True
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_claim_rules_match_pre_gateway_table() -> None:
|
|
"""PERMISSIONS.md "What Each Role Can Claim From" — exact match.
|
|
|
|
PMs claim from PENDING only; BACKLOG → PENDING is a separate `activate`
|
|
action (strict transitions; no implicit activate-on-claim).
|
|
"""
|
|
assert spec.CLAIM_RULES[spec.Role.DEVELOPER] == frozenset(
|
|
{spec.Status.PENDING, spec.Status.NEEDS_REVISION}
|
|
)
|
|
assert spec.CLAIM_RULES[spec.Role.QA] == frozenset({spec.Status.AWAITING_QA})
|
|
assert spec.CLAIM_RULES[spec.Role.DOCUMENTER] == frozenset(
|
|
{spec.Status.PENDING, spec.Status.AWAITING_DOCUMENTATION}
|
|
)
|
|
assert spec.CLAIM_RULES[spec.Role.CELL_PM] == frozenset({spec.Status.PENDING})
|
|
assert spec.CLAIM_RULES[spec.Role.MAIN_PM] == frozenset({spec.Status.PENDING})
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_team_rules_pin_team_for_seeded_agents() -> None:
|
|
assert spec.ROLE_TEAM_RULES["be-dev-1"] == "backend"
|
|
assert spec.ROLE_TEAM_RULES["be-pm"] == "backend"
|
|
assert spec.ROLE_TEAM_RULES["fe-qa"] == "frontend"
|
|
assert spec.ROLE_TEAM_RULES["main-pm"] is None # cross-cell
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_intent_verbs_table_has_every_gateway_verb() -> None:
|
|
"""Every gateway intent verb must have an IntentSpec."""
|
|
expected = {
|
|
"give_me_work",
|
|
"i_will_work_on",
|
|
"i_will_plan",
|
|
"delegate",
|
|
"open_pr",
|
|
"i_am_done",
|
|
"i_am_blocked",
|
|
"unclaim",
|
|
"resume",
|
|
"i_am_idle",
|
|
"claim_review",
|
|
"pass_review",
|
|
"fail_review",
|
|
"claim_doc_task",
|
|
"i_documented",
|
|
"complete",
|
|
"escalate_up",
|
|
"escalate_to_ceo",
|
|
"submit_up",
|
|
"unblock",
|
|
"triage",
|
|
"triage_all",
|
|
}
|
|
assert expected <= set(spec._INTENT_VERBS), (
|
|
f"Missing IntentSpec entries: {expected - set(spec._INTENT_VERBS)}"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_i_will_work_on_composes_claim_set_plan_start() -> None:
|
|
iv = spec._INTENT_VERBS["i_will_work_on"]
|
|
assert iv.composes == ("claim", "set_plan", "start")
|
|
assert spec.Role.DEVELOPER in iv.allowed_roles
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_i_will_plan_composes_claim_set_plan_start() -> None:
|
|
"""PMs use i_will_plan; the composition mirrors i_will_work_on."""
|
|
iv = spec._INTENT_VERBS["i_will_plan"]
|
|
assert iv.composes == ("claim", "set_plan", "start")
|
|
assert iv.allowed_roles == frozenset({spec.Role.CELL_PM, spec.Role.MAIN_PM})
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_i_am_done_composes_submit_verification_then_submit_qa() -> None:
|
|
iv = spec._INTENT_VERBS["i_am_done"]
|
|
assert iv.composes == ("submit_verification", "submit_qa")
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_open_pr_has_git_side_effects() -> None:
|
|
"""open_pr is a side-effect-only verb (no DB transition)."""
|
|
iv = spec._INTENT_VERBS["open_pr"]
|
|
assert "push_branch" in iv.side_effects
|
|
assert "create_pr" in iv.side_effects
|
|
assert iv.composes == () # pure side effect verb
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_delegate_composes_create_subtask() -> None:
|
|
iv = spec._INTENT_VERBS["delegate"]
|
|
assert iv.composes == ("create_subtask",)
|
|
assert iv.allowed_roles == frozenset({spec.Role.CELL_PM, spec.Role.MAIN_PM})
|
|
|
|
|
|
_STUB_TASK_DEFAULTS: dict[str, Any] = {
|
|
"status": "pending",
|
|
"task_type": "code",
|
|
"commits": [],
|
|
"plan": None,
|
|
"assigned_to": None,
|
|
"pr_number": None,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _stub_task(**overrides: Any) -> SimpleNamespace:
|
|
fields = {**_STUB_TASK_DEFAULTS, **overrides}
|
|
fields["commits"] = fields["commits"] or []
|
|
return SimpleNamespace(**fields)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_can_claim_developer_pending_allowed() -> None:
|
|
d = spec.can_claim(spec.Role.DEVELOPER, _stub_task(status="pending"))
|
|
assert d.allowed is True
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_can_claim_developer_completed_rejected() -> None:
|
|
d = spec.can_claim(spec.Role.DEVELOPER, _stub_task(status="completed"))
|
|
assert d.allowed is False
|
|
assert d.rejection_kind == "invalid_state"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_can_claim_developer_awaiting_qa_rejected() -> None:
|
|
"""Devs cannot claim awaiting_qa - that's QA's path."""
|
|
d = spec.can_claim(spec.Role.DEVELOPER, _stub_task(status="awaiting_qa"))
|
|
assert d.allowed is False
|
|
assert d.rejection_kind == "not_authorized"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_can_invoke_intent_developer_can_call_i_will_work_on() -> None:
|
|
d = spec.can_invoke_intent(
|
|
spec.Role.DEVELOPER,
|
|
"i_will_work_on",
|
|
_stub_task(status="pending"),
|
|
context=spec.Context(plan="my plan"),
|
|
)
|
|
assert d.allowed is True
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_can_invoke_intent_pm_cannot_call_i_will_work_on() -> None:
|
|
"""PMs use i_will_plan; i_will_work_on is dev-only."""
|
|
d = spec.can_invoke_intent(
|
|
spec.Role.CELL_PM,
|
|
"i_will_work_on",
|
|
_stub_task(status="pending"),
|
|
context=spec.Context(plan="x"),
|
|
)
|
|
assert d.allowed is False
|
|
assert d.rejection_kind == "not_authorized"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_can_invoke_intent_developer_open_pr_no_commits_tracing_gap() -> None:
|
|
"""open_pr requires >=1 commit. Without one -> tracing_gap."""
|
|
d = spec.can_invoke_intent(
|
|
spec.Role.DEVELOPER,
|
|
"open_pr",
|
|
_stub_task(status="in_progress", commits=[]),
|
|
context=spec.Context(),
|
|
)
|
|
assert d.allowed is False
|
|
assert d.rejection_kind == "tracing_gap"
|
|
assert "commits>=1" in d.missing
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_valid_next_verbs_developer_in_progress_includes_open_pr_and_i_am_done() -> (
|
|
None
|
|
):
|
|
verbs = spec.valid_next_verbs(spec.Role.DEVELOPER, _stub_task(status="in_progress"))
|
|
assert "open_pr" in verbs
|
|
assert "i_am_done" in verbs
|
|
assert "i_am_blocked" in verbs
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_valid_next_verbs_pm_pending_includes_i_will_plan() -> None:
|
|
verbs = spec.valid_next_verbs(spec.Role.CELL_PM, _stub_task(status="pending"))
|
|
assert "i_will_plan" in verbs
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_composed_actions_for_returns_intent_composition() -> None:
|
|
assert spec.composed_actions_for("i_will_work_on") == ("claim", "set_plan", "start")
|
|
assert spec.composed_actions_for("open_pr") == ()
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_intents_for_role_returns_role_scoped_verbs() -> None:
|
|
dev_verbs = spec.intents_for_role(spec.Role.DEVELOPER)
|
|
assert "i_will_work_on" in dev_verbs
|
|
assert "open_pr" in dev_verbs
|
|
assert "i_am_done" in dev_verbs
|
|
assert "delegate" not in dev_verbs # PM only
|
|
assert "claim_review" not in dev_verbs # QA only
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_status_after_returns_target_status() -> None:
|
|
assert spec.status_after("claim", spec.Status.PENDING) == spec.Status.CLAIMED
|
|
assert (
|
|
spec.status_after("submit_qa", spec.Status.VERIFYING) == spec.Status.AWAITING_QA
|
|
)
|
|
assert (
|
|
spec.status_after("set_plan", spec.Status.IN_PROGRESS) is None
|
|
) # no transition
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_can_invoke_intent_open_pr_passes_when_owner_with_commits() -> None:
|
|
"""Green path for open_pr: owner + commits + no prior PR → allow."""
|
|
owner_id = uuid4()
|
|
task = _stub_task(
|
|
status="in_progress",
|
|
commits=["abc"],
|
|
pr_number=None,
|
|
assigned_to=owner_id,
|
|
)
|
|
d = spec.can_invoke_intent(
|
|
spec.Role.DEVELOPER,
|
|
"open_pr",
|
|
task,
|
|
context=spec.Context(actor_id=owner_id),
|
|
)
|
|
assert d.allowed is True, f"expected allow, got {d}"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_can_invoke_intent_open_pr_rejects_non_owner() -> None:
|
|
"""Non-owner trying open_pr → tracing_gap with owns_task missing."""
|
|
owner_id = uuid4()
|
|
intruder_id = uuid4()
|
|
task = _stub_task(
|
|
status="in_progress",
|
|
commits=["abc"],
|
|
pr_number=None,
|
|
assigned_to=owner_id,
|
|
)
|
|
d = spec.can_invoke_intent(
|
|
spec.Role.DEVELOPER,
|
|
"open_pr",
|
|
task,
|
|
context=spec.Context(actor_id=intruder_id),
|
|
)
|
|
assert d.allowed is False
|
|
assert d.rejection_kind == "tracing_gap"
|
|
assert "owns_task" in d.missing
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
# Task 8 — self-consistency validators (`_validate.py`)
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_validators_pass_on_real_spec() -> None:
|
|
"""Importing roboco.foundation.policy.lifecycle must not raise —
|
|
module-level import IS the test. We additionally call the runner
|
|
directly so a future refactor that detaches it from import doesn't
|
|
silently skip the gate.
|
|
"""
|
|
_validate.run_all_lifecycle_validators()
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_every_status_reachable_from_pending() -> None:
|
|
"""Reachability — except CANCELLED is its own thing and BACKLOG predates pending."""
|
|
reachable = reachable_from(spec.Status.PENDING)
|
|
expected_reachable = set(spec.Status) - {spec.Status.BACKLOG, spec.Status.CANCELLED}
|
|
assert expected_reachable <= reachable, (
|
|
f"Unreachable from pending: {expected_reachable - reachable}"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_every_intent_verb_composes_known_actions() -> None:
|
|
"""Every IntentSpec.composes must reference declared atomic actions."""
|
|
for name, iv in spec._INTENT_VERBS.items():
|
|
for action_name in iv.composes:
|
|
assert action_name in spec._ATOMIC_ACTIONS, (
|
|
f"Intent '{name}' composes unknown action '{action_name}'"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_self_review_symmetry() -> None:
|
|
"""If qa_pass blocks, qa_fail and docs_complete must too."""
|
|
qp = spec._ATOMIC_ACTIONS["qa_pass"].self_review_block
|
|
qf = spec._ATOMIC_ACTIONS["qa_fail"].self_review_block
|
|
dc = spec._ATOMIC_ACTIONS["docs_complete"].self_review_block
|
|
assert qp == qf == dc, (
|
|
"self_review_block asymmetry between qa_pass/qa_fail/docs_complete"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_run_all_validators_raises_on_unknown_intent_action(
|
|
monkeypatch: pytest.MonkeyPatch,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""If an IntentSpec.composes references a non-existent action, the
|
|
validator must raise LifecycleSpecError. Pins the gate's actual
|
|
behavior — without this test, refactors that move run_all_validators()
|
|
out of the import path could silently disable the gate.
|
|
"""
|
|
iv = _INTENT_VERBS["delegate"]
|
|
broken = IntentSpec(
|
|
name=iv.name,
|
|
allowed_roles=iv.allowed_roles,
|
|
description=iv.description,
|
|
composes=("create_subtask", "ZZZ_FAKE_ACTION_DOES_NOT_EXIST"),
|
|
extra_preconditions=iv.extra_preconditions,
|
|
side_effects=iv.side_effects,
|
|
next_hint=iv.next_hint,
|
|
)
|
|
patched_intents = dict(_INTENT_VERBS)
|
|
patched_intents["delegate"] = broken
|
|
monkeypatch.setattr(
|
|
"roboco.foundation.policy.lifecycle._INTENT_VERBS", patched_intents
|
|
)
|
|
with pytest.raises(_validate.LifecycleSpecError, match="ZZZ_FAKE_ACTION"):
|
|
_validate.run_all_lifecycle_validators()
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_unmigrated_is_pinned() -> None:
|
|
"""The known-debt set; remove an entry once that consumer is migrated."""
|
|
assert (
|
|
frozenset(
|
|
{
|
|
"enforcement.task_lifecycle._LEGACY_OPERATIONAL_EDGES",
|
|
"enforcement.task_lifecycle._LEGACY_ROLE_GATES",
|
|
}
|
|
)
|
|
== spec.UNMIGRATED
|
|
)
|