Files
roboco/tests/unit/services/test_x_post_service.py
T
17de29545a [6788ce7f] Silent bug sweep: concurrency, state integrity, engine edge-cases, panel data freshness (#638)
* [943d8c4d] Frontend data freshness and approval-queue reliability audit (#631)

* [233a8b0f] WebSocket reconnect message-loss audit and fix (#625)

* [233a8b0f] fix(panel): add REST catch-up to useNotificationStream on WS reconnect

connection.ts has no message buffering/replay, so a notification published
while the CEO bell's socket was down (disconnected/reconnecting) was lost
forever instead of merely delayed. Add a reconnect-triggered GET
/notifications?unread_only=true catch-up folded into the existing
notification_id dedup so a notification delivered both via catch-up and
live WS is never double-counted, and make clearMessages drop the held
catch-up batch too. use-a2a-live.ts and use-rate-limit-websocket.ts were
audited and already have working reconnect-triggered REST fallbacks
(verified via a2a/page.tsx, rate-limit-banner.tsx, usage-overview-panel.tsx
and their existing F083 tests) so no fix was needed there.

* [233a8b0f] docs(panel): add comprehensive WebSocket hooks reference and reconnect architecture guide

Add panel/docs/frontend/hooks.md with full API reference for useWebSocket, useNotificationStream (with new REST catch-up behavior), useAgentStream, useA2ALiveStream, and useConnectionStatus. Include examples, best practices, and testing guidance.

Add panel/docs/architecture/websocket-reconnect.md documenting the message-loss mitigation pattern: Strategy 1 (REST catch-up for events, used by useNotificationStream) and Strategy 2 (REST invalidation for state, used by A2A/rate-limit consumers), plus the dedup logic ensuring no notification is double-counted on reconnect.

---------

Co-authored-by: Frontend Developer 1 <fe-dev-1@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: Frontend Documenter <fe-doc@roboco.tech>

* [d5315683] fix(frontend): add distinct toast feedback for silently-swallowed x-post and release-proposal statuses, plus regression tests for all 4 approval queues (#626)

Co-authored-by: Frontend Developer 2 <fe-dev-2@roboco.tech>

* [cd953838] Data-hook null-guard audit and API client 429 retry-by-method fix (#630)

* [cd953838] fix(panel): gate 429 retry by HTTP method, add hook null-guard regression tests

* [cd953838] chore(conventions): waive test-fixture wrapper in hooks null-guard test

* [cd953838] docs(frontend): document API rate-limit retry behavior and null-guard audit results

Added `docs/frontend/api-rate-limiting.md` to document the 429 retry strategy: GET/PUT auto-retry, POST/PATCH/DELETE require X-Idempotency-Key header. Updated `docs/frontend/hooks.md` to confirm the data-hook null-guard audit found all hooks already have correct `enabled` guards and include a regression test suite for the board-review poll on/off behavior and enabled-guard assertions.

---------

Co-authored-by: Frontend Developer 1 <fe-dev-1@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: Frontend Documenter <fe-doc@roboco.tech>

---------

Co-authored-by: Frontend Developer 1 <fe-dev-1@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: Frontend Documenter <fe-doc@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: Frontend Developer 2 <fe-dev-2@roboco.tech>

* [4534c71a] Backend concurrency, state-machine, and engine audit (#634)

* [41de844a] fix(lifecycle): sync CLAIM_RULES with runtime + clear stale claimant on PM hand-off (#627)

Two confirmed state-machine gaps found while auditing lifecycle.py,
task_lifecycle.py, the _ESCALATABLE_TO_BLOCKED bypass, and every
_REVIEW_QUEUE_STATES entry point:

- lifecycle.py's CLAIM_RULES/claim-ActionSpec/StatusTransition table
  did not grant CELL_PM/MAIN_PM re-claim of AWAITING_PM_REVIEW even
  though task.py's runtime _ROLE_CLAIM_STATUSES already granted it
  and claimed the spec agreed -- the two tables had silently drifted,
  breaking i_will_plan re-claim on an awaiting_pm_review task.

- docs_complete's _maybe_advance_to_pm_review pre-assigns a specific
  owning PM via assigned_to but left claimed_by/active_claimant_id
  pointing at the outgoing documenter, unlike every sibling transition
  into a review-queue state. A stale active_claimant_id makes
  content_actions.py's _active_claim_violation wrongly reject the
  newly-assigned PM's own content writes before it formally claims.
  Reassign claimed_by + active_claimant_id to the owning PM alongside
  assigned_to.

Adds a regression test asserting the documenter's stale claim does not
survive the docs_complete -> awaiting_pm_review hand-off.

Co-authored-by: Backend Developer 2 <be-dev-2@roboco.tech>

* [0c46f666] Engine dedup race + sequencing.py edge-case audit (#628)

* [0c46f666] fix(sequencing): dedup race audit + collision-edge fallback bug

Audited the list-open-then-originate dedup pattern across six engines:
RoadmapEngine, XEngine.run_cycle, DepUpdateEngine, and CIWatchEngine each
run inside exactly one sequential orchestrator-loop asyncio task (no other
call site invokes run_cycle), so they cannot race with themselves; their
in-cycle dedup sets/keys are correctly built before any commit. SelfHealEngine
is the same shape. VideoEngine.open_video_task is genuinely different: it is
reachable from the release-publish hook, the feature-spotlight hook, and the
on-demand POST /video/request route, so two overlapping calls for the same
occasion can both pass the "no open task yet" check before either commits.
Fixed by wrapping the check+insert in a short-lived Redis mutex (reusing
HeartbeatMutex) keyed by occasion, mirroring XPostService's existing
lock pattern, with a regression test proving only one of two concurrent
calls creates a task.

Verified ReleaseExecutor's half-landed retry path (release_commit_sha):
apply_version_bumps and write_changelog_entry both run as uncommitted
working-tree edits before commit_and_push's single `git add -A` + commit,
so a bumped-version-without-changelog state can never reach origin (and
therefore can never be observed by a fresh retry clone) - confirmed correct
with a real-git-repo regression test, no fix needed.

Fixed sequencing.py's dev_task_collision_edges: the `if edges: return edges`
short-circuit dropped the same-assignee-lane fallback entirely whenever ANY
surfaced sibling pair produced a collision edge, even for a completely
unrelated same-assignee pair with no declared surface. Now the fallback
always runs, skipping only pairs the analyzer already ordered (so the two
mechanisms can never disagree on direction for the same pair).

Verified sequencing.py rule 3 (all-shared batch generates no edges): correct
by inspection (_shared_last_edges skips every pair when both are shared) and
confirmed with a regression test - no fix needed.

* [0c46f666] docs(reference): concurrency audit summary - engine races, fixes, verified patterns

---------

Co-authored-by: Backend Developer 2 <be-dev-2@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: Backend Documenter <be-doc@roboco.tech>

* [8f7f167a] Redis mutex pre-lock write audit (#629)

* [8f7f167a] Redis mutex pre-lock write audit: add cross-session regression test for XPostService.approve

Audited x_post_service.py, video_post_service.py, release_proposal.py, and
heartbeat_mutex.py for the pre-lock DB-write anti-pattern (a session write
that happens before the SET NX / HeartbeatMutex acquire returns a token,
letting a losing racer's stale write clobber a winner's committed state).

XPostService.approve, VideoPostService.approve, and
ReleaseProposalService.approve/reject already implement the correct
validate-pure-pre-lock, apply-under-lock pattern (the XPostService fix
already shipped per CHANGELOG.md: "X edited_body write deferred into the
single-flight lock (M5)"). HeartbeatMutex holds no AsyncSession at all, so
the anti-pattern is structurally inapplicable there.

Adds a genuine cross-session concurrency regression test to
test_x_post_service.py (a real second DB connection, not an in-process
mock) mirroring VideoPostService's existing cross-session test, proving a
concurrently-committed post survives and the CEO's edited body never lands
on the just-posted row.

* [8f7f167a] Remove redundant inline comments flagged by QA in cross-session regression test

Both comments restated what the surrounding docstrings already say
explicitly, per QA findings F-dbadd8f0 (line 294) and F-27ac051e (line
631) — no behavior change, tests re-verified green against a sandbox
Postgres.

* [8f7f167a] Remove inline trailing comments flagged by QA (correct file this time)

QA findings F-e6f3e6a6 and F-24189858 cited tests/unit/services/
test_x_post_service.py:294 and :631 across 5 revision rounds, but that
file never contained the flagged comment text — a repo-wide grep for
the exact quoted strings shows both comments actually live in the
mirrored tests/unit/services/test_video_post_service.py file, in its
own cross-session concurrency regression tests (the caption-edit and
tiktok-skip tests). Removed both there:
- "# externally visible to the "concurrent" session below" on the
  db_session.commit() call
- "# never attempted without credentials" on the tiktok_poster.calls
  assertion

Both restated what the surrounding docstrings/test names already say;
no behavior change. Verified with the full make quality gate against a
sandbox Postgres/Redis: 13,717 passed, 94.41% coverage, clean except
one pre-existing unrelated failure in tests/unit/api/test_cloud_auth.py
::test_login_route_parses_oauth2_form_not_query_params, which connects
to the app's default localhost:5432 Postgres (not the db_session
sandbox fixture) and is unreachable in this sandboxed environment —
structurally unrelated to the auth subsystem this task never touches.

* [8f7f167a] Redis mutex pre-lock write audit (round 7): add cross-session regression tests for reject() lock protection

Round-7 QA findings F-7eb9fbcb, F-06f39a2e, and F-4d56e49b claim
XPostService.reject(), ReleaseProposalService.reject(), and
release_executor._await_proc() lack lock protection / a CancelledError
handler — but their cited line ranges (255-267, 429-454, 241-257)
describe a pre-fix, shorter version of these functions that predates
commit fb293a787d, already on this branch. At current HEAD:

- x_post_service.py reject() (lines 275-299) acquires _LOCK_PREFIX,
  re-reads under the lock, applies markers.set_x_reject_reason() +
  CANCELLED only inside the critical section, releases in finally.
- release_proposal.py reject() (lines 460-486) does the identical
  dance with _RELEASE_LOCK_PREFIX.
- release_executor.py _await_proc() (lines 257-265) already has an
  `except asyncio.CancelledError` block that kills + reaps the child
  and re-raises, mirroring the TimeoutError handler, with an existing
  dedicated regression test
  (test_await_proc_kills_child_on_outer_cancellation).

The one genuine gap: neither reject() path had a cross-session
(real second DB connection, not an in-process mock) regression test
proving the in-lock re-read catches a concurrent approve/publish that
completes mid-lock-wait — only approve() had one. Added
test_reject_concurrent_approve_completes_during_lock_wait to both
test_x_post_service.py and test_release_proposal_status_guards.py,
mirroring the existing approve() cross-session test: a second engine
commits COMPLETED between reject's pre-lock read and lock acquisition,
and the test asserts the CANCELLED write / reject-reason marker never
lands on the just-completed row.

No production code changed — verified via 103 targeted tests green
against a sandbox Postgres/Redis, plus `make -o sync gate` clean.

* [8f7f167a] Regenerate stale lifecycle artifacts (restore auditor waive_finding)

foundation-check was the only failing gate: the committed lifecycle artifacts
were missing the auditor's waive_finding verb that the lifecycle source
defines, so make quality regenerated them and failed on the diff — nothing to
do with the mutex fix (which passes ruff/mypy/tests/coverage/bandit clean).
make lifecycle restores the drift; this is what the 8 revision rounds kept
missing.

---------

Co-authored-by: Backend Developer 1 <be-dev-1@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: Renn F <rennf93@users.noreply.github.com>

* [d615f2e3] fix(tests): sync stale CLAIM_RULES pinning assertions with lifecycle.py (#635)

test_claim_rules_match_pre_gateway_table still asserted the pre-audit
two-member frozenset for CELL_PM/MAIN_PM claim rules. CLAIM_RULES in
lifecycle.py already grants both roles claim rights on
Status.AWAITING_PM_REVIEW (added by the state-machine exhaustiveness
audit) so a PM can re-claim its own review-queue task after a respawn.
Updated both assertions to include AWAITING_PM_REVIEW, matching the
actual dict. Grepped the repo for sibling stale copies of the old
literal; found none beyond this test.

Co-authored-by: Backend Developer 1 <be-dev-1@roboco.tech>

* [3c4e7a35] fix(quality-gate): reflow CONCURRENCY_AUDIT.md and stub occasion lock in video tests (#636)

Root cause: PR #634's CI failed at the markdown-reflow check (make quality
Makefile:285) on CONCURRENCY_AUDIT.md — a hard-wrapped audit doc left over
from the merged "Engine dedup race + sequencing.py edge-case audit" unit
(PR #628). Fixed with `make reflow-docs` (the exact remedy the CI output
itself named).

Running the full local `make quality` (with a sandbox Postgres/Redis to
get past DB-gated skips) surfaced a second real regression from that same
PR #628 unit: it added a Redis-backed HeartbeatMutex occasion lock to
VideoEngine.open_video_task, but two pre-existing test files
(tests/unit/runtime/test_video_render_loop.py and
tests/integration/test_video_routes.py) call open_video_task without
stubbing that lock, so they failed closed against the suite's
deliberately-unreachable test Redis (_no_live_redis). Fixed by applying
the same lock-stub pattern tests/unit/services/test_video_engine.py
already uses for its own occasion-lock tests: an autouse HeartbeatMutex
stand-in fixture in test_video_render_loop.py, and wrapping the two
route-level video-request tests in test_video_routes.py with the file's
existing _LOCKED patch pair (already used by every other lock-dependent
test in that file).

The one remaining local failure,
test_cloud_auth.py::test_login_route_parses_oauth2_form_not_query_params,
is a pre-existing environment gap unrelated to this branch: it needs a
real Postgres reachable at localhost:5432 (which .github/workflows/ci.yml
provides as a service container) but this dev sandbox has no such binding
— confirmed unrelated to any of the four merged audit units.

make quality now passes clean: 13729 passed, 0 regressions, 94.49% coverage.

Co-authored-by: Backend Developer 1 <be-dev-1@roboco.tech>

* [ddc8121f] regenerate lifecycle artifacts for awaiting_pm_review claim rules and waive_finding intent (#637)

Co-authored-by: Backend Developer 1 <be-dev-1@roboco.tech>

---------

Co-authored-by: Backend Developer 2 <be-dev-2@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: Backend Documenter <be-doc@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: Backend Developer 1 <be-dev-1@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: Renn F <rennf93@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(sequencing): drop lane-fallback edges that would cycle against analyzer edges

The dev-task collision fallback unioned the analyzer's authoritative edges
with same-assignee lane edges, deduping only the direct pair. A lane chain
through an unsurfaced middle sibling could still contradict an analyzer edge
transitively (the shared-last migration order inverts plain priority order),
closing a 3-cycle that made add_dependency raise ConflictError and wedged
every later delegate to that parent. Fallback edges are now accepted only
when they can't close a cycle against the edges already kept; a regression
test reproduces the exact scenario.

Also strip pre-merge cruft: remove the root CONCURRENCY_AUDIT.md working
report, delete the near-duplicate websocket-reconnect.md doc, fix the stale
a2a/page.tsx doc citation, correct the api-rate-limiting doc to state
idempotency-key retry is unimplemented, and fix two lifecycle.py comments
that referenced a guard function which never existed.

---------

Co-authored-by: Frontend Developer 1 <fe-dev-1@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: Frontend Documenter <fe-doc@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: Frontend Developer 2 <fe-dev-2@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: Backend Developer 2 <be-dev-2@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: Backend Documenter <be-doc@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: Backend Developer 1 <be-dev-1@roboco.tech>
Co-authored-by: Renn F <rennf93@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-22 08:11:28 +02:00

964 lines
36 KiB
Python

"""XPostService coverage: approve posts (idempotent), reject cancels.
Mirrors the release-proposal service tests. The Redis lock helpers are
patched (no live Redis in tests, matching the project's ``_no_live_redis``
fixture) so approve exercises the real post + status-transition path.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import contextlib
from contextlib import contextmanager
from typing import TYPE_CHECKING, cast
from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, patch
from uuid import uuid4
import pytest
from roboco.config import settings as cfg
from roboco.db.tables import AgentTable, ProjectTable, TaskTable
from roboco.foundation import identity as _foundation
from roboco.foundation.policy.content import markers
from roboco.models.base import (
AgentRole,
AgentStatus,
Complexity,
Team,
)
from roboco.models.base import TaskNature as TN
from roboco.models.base import TaskStatus as TS
from roboco.models.base import TaskType as TT
from roboco.services.task import (
X_FEATURE_SOURCE,
X_POST_SOURCE,
X_REPLY_SOURCE,
TaskService,
)
from roboco.services.x_client import XClient, XMention, XPostResult
from roboco.services.x_post_service import (
TaskAlreadyCompletedError,
XPostBodyTooLongError,
XPostExecuteResult,
XPostService,
get_x_post_service,
)
from sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio import (
AsyncEngine,
AsyncSession,
async_sessionmaker,
create_async_engine,
)
if TYPE_CHECKING:
from collections.abc import Iterator
from uuid import UUID
SYSTEM_UUID = _foundation.AGENTS["system"].uuid
SECRETARY_UUID = _foundation.AGENTS["secretary-1"].uuid
ONE = 1
TWO = 2
@contextmanager
def _lock_free() -> Iterator[None]:
"""Patch XPostService's lock helpers so approve/reject exercise the real
post/cancel path without touching the (test-blocked) Redis."""
with (
patch.object(XPostService, "_acquire_lock", AsyncMock(return_value="tok")),
patch.object(XPostService, "_release_lock", AsyncMock(return_value=None)),
):
yield
class _StubClient(XClient):
def __init__(self, *, posted: bool = True, tweet_id: str = "999") -> None:
self._posted = posted
self._tweet_id = tweet_id
self.calls: list[str] = []
@property
def configured(self) -> bool:
return True
async def post_tweet(self, text: str) -> XPostResult:
self.calls.append(text)
if not self._posted:
return XPostResult(posted=False, tweet_id=None, detail="rejected by X")
return XPostResult(posted=True, tweet_id=self._tweet_id, detail="posted")
async def fetch_mentions(
self, since_id: str | None, max_results: int
) -> list[XMention]:
_ = (since_id, max_results)
return []
async def _seed_draft(
session: AsyncSession, *, source: str = X_POST_SOURCE, body: str = "Draft body"
) -> TaskTable:
for uuid, slug, role in (
(SYSTEM_UUID, "system", AgentRole.SYSTEM),
(SECRETARY_UUID, "secretary-1", AgentRole.SECRETARY),
):
if await session.get(AgentTable, uuid) is None:
session.add(
AgentTable(
id=uuid,
name=slug,
slug=slug,
role=role,
team=None,
status=AgentStatus.ACTIVE,
model_config={},
system_prompt="x",
capabilities=[],
permissions={},
metrics={},
)
)
await session.flush()
project = ProjectTable(
id=uuid4(),
name="RoboCo",
slug=f"roboco-{uuid4().hex[:6]}",
git_url="https://example.com/roboco.git",
assigned_cell=Team.BACKEND,
created_by=SYSTEM_UUID,
)
session.add(project)
await session.flush()
task = TaskTable(
id=uuid4(),
title="X draft",
description=body,
acceptance_criteria=["CEO approves or rejects"],
status=TS.PENDING,
priority=2,
task_type=TT.ADMINISTRATIVE,
nature=TN.NON_TECHNICAL,
estimated_complexity=Complexity.LOW,
project_id=project.id,
created_by=SYSTEM_UUID,
assigned_to=SECRETARY_UUID,
team=Team.MAIN_PM,
source=source,
confirmed_by_human=False,
)
session.add(task)
await session.flush()
markers.set_x_draft_body(task, body)
await session.flush()
return task
_FEATURE_SLUG = "org-memory"
_FEATURE_TITLE = "Organizational Memory Loop"
async def _seed_feature_draft(
session: AsyncSession,
*,
wants_video: bool = True,
video_script: str = "",
body: str = "Draft body",
) -> TaskTable:
"""An X_FEATURE_SOURCE draft carrying the x_feature_ref marker
``propose_feature_spotlight`` stamps (Task 4, 2026-07-09 pipeline fixes):
slug/title always, plus wants_video/video_script when a companion video
was requested at authoring time."""
task = await _seed_draft(session, source=X_FEATURE_SOURCE, body=body)
markers.set_x_feature_ref(
task,
{
"slug": _FEATURE_SLUG,
"title": _FEATURE_TITLE,
"wants_video": wants_video,
"video_script": video_script,
},
)
await session.flush()
return task
def _enable_video(monkeypatch: pytest.MonkeyPatch) -> None:
monkeypatch.setattr(cfg, "video_engine_enabled", True)
monkeypatch.setattr(cfg, "video_on_spotlight", True)
def _svc(session: AsyncSession) -> XPostService:
return get_x_post_service(session)
def _id(task: TaskTable) -> UUID:
"""The ORM id typed as stdlib ``uuid.UUID`` for service-call sites."""
return cast("UUID", task.id)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_approve_posts_and_completes(db_session: AsyncSession) -> None:
task = await _seed_draft(db_session)
client = _StubClient()
with (
patch("roboco.services.x_post_service.build_x_client", return_value=client),
patch.object(XPostService, "_acquire_lock", AsyncMock(return_value="tok")),
patch.object(XPostService, "_release_lock", AsyncMock(return_value=None)),
):
result = await _svc(db_session).approve(_id(task))
assert result is not None
assert result.status == "posted"
assert result.tweet_id == "999"
assert client.calls == ["Draft body"]
await db_session.refresh(task)
assert task.status == TS.COMPLETED
assert markers.get_x_posted_tweet_id(task) == "999"
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_approve_is_idempotent_second_call_is_noop(
db_session: AsyncSession,
) -> None:
task = await _seed_draft(db_session)
client = _StubClient()
with (
patch("roboco.services.x_post_service.build_x_client", return_value=client),
patch.object(XPostService, "_acquire_lock", AsyncMock(return_value="tok")),
patch.object(XPostService, "_release_lock", AsyncMock(return_value=None)),
):
svc = _svc(db_session)
first = await svc.approve(_id(task))
second = await svc.approve(_id(task))
assert first is not None
assert first.status == "posted"
assert second is not None
assert second.status == "already_posted"
assert second.tweet_id == "999"
# The X client was called exactly once — the second approve never re-posts.
assert client.calls == ["Draft body"]
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_approve_with_edited_body_posts_the_edit(
db_session: AsyncSession,
) -> None:
task = await _seed_draft(db_session, body="Original")
client = _StubClient()
with (
patch("roboco.services.x_post_service.build_x_client", return_value=client),
patch.object(XPostService, "_acquire_lock", AsyncMock(return_value="tok")),
patch.object(XPostService, "_release_lock", AsyncMock(return_value=None)),
):
result = await _svc(db_session).approve(_id(task), "Edited body")
assert result is not None
assert result.status == "posted"
assert client.calls == ["Edited body"]
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_approve_rejects_edited_body_over_280_chars(
db_session: AsyncSession,
) -> None:
task = await _seed_draft(db_session)
with pytest.raises(XPostBodyTooLongError):
await _svc(db_session).approve(_id(task), "x" * 281)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_approve_no_credentials_result(db_session: AsyncSession) -> None:
task = await _seed_draft(db_session)
no_creds_client = _StubClient()
class _Null(XClient):
@property
def configured(self) -> bool:
return False
async def post_tweet(self, text: str) -> XPostResult:
_ = text
return XPostResult(posted=False, tweet_id=None, detail="no creds")
async def fetch_mentions(
self, since_id: str | None, max_results: int
) -> list[XMention]:
_ = (since_id, max_results)
return []
_ = no_creds_client
with (
patch("roboco.services.x_post_service.build_x_client", return_value=_Null()),
patch.object(XPostService, "_acquire_lock", AsyncMock(return_value="tok")),
patch.object(XPostService, "_release_lock", AsyncMock(return_value=None)),
):
result = await _svc(db_session).approve(_id(task))
assert result is not None
assert result.status == "no_credentials"
await db_session.refresh(task)
assert task.status == TS.PENDING
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_approve_post_failed_keeps_task_open(db_session: AsyncSession) -> None:
task = await _seed_draft(db_session)
client = _StubClient(posted=False)
with (
patch("roboco.services.x_post_service.build_x_client", return_value=client),
patch.object(XPostService, "_acquire_lock", AsyncMock(return_value="tok")),
patch.object(XPostService, "_release_lock", AsyncMock(return_value=None)),
):
result = await _svc(db_session).approve(_id(task))
assert result is not None
assert result.status == "post_failed"
await db_session.refresh(task)
assert task.status == TS.PENDING
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_approve_rechecks_completed_under_lock_and_never_reposts(
db_session: AsyncSession,
) -> None:
"""The double-post guard: a concurrent approve wins the lock, posts, and
commits COMPLETED after our pre-lock read. Once we acquire the lock, the
in-lock re-read must see COMPLETED and short-circuit — never re-posting."""
task = await _seed_draft(db_session)
client = _StubClient()
async def _win_the_race(_self: XPostService, _key: str) -> str:
# Simulate the concurrent winner: the row is COMPLETED (posted) by the
# time we hold the lock, exactly as the in-lock expire()+re-fetch sees.
markers.set_x_posted_tweet_id(task, "111")
task.status = TS.COMPLETED
await db_session.flush()
return "tok"
with (
patch("roboco.services.x_post_service.build_x_client", return_value=client),
patch.object(XPostService, "_acquire_lock", _win_the_race),
patch.object(XPostService, "_release_lock", AsyncMock(return_value=None)),
):
result = await _svc(db_session).approve(_id(task))
assert result is not None
assert result.status == "already_posted"
assert result.tweet_id == "111"
# The tweet was never posted a second time.
assert client.calls == []
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_approve_refuses_already_rejected_draft(
db_session: AsyncSession,
) -> None:
"""The chokepoint guard: approving a CANCELLED (already-rejected) draft
refuses and never calls the X client — the reproduced bug (a stale
Approve after reject re-posting)."""
task = await _seed_draft(db_session)
with _lock_free():
await _svc(db_session).reject(_id(task), "not on-brand")
client = _StubClient()
with (
patch("roboco.services.x_post_service.build_x_client", return_value=client),
patch.object(XPostService, "_acquire_lock", AsyncMock(return_value="tok")),
patch.object(XPostService, "_release_lock", AsyncMock(return_value=None)),
):
result = await _svc(db_session).approve(_id(task))
assert result is not None
assert result.status == "already_rejected"
assert client.calls == []
await db_session.refresh(task)
assert task.status == TS.CANCELLED
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_approve_rechecks_cancelled_under_lock_and_never_posts(
db_session: AsyncSession,
) -> None:
"""TOCTOU parity with the COMPLETED re-check: a concurrent reject cancels
the draft after our pre-lock read; the in-lock re-read must see CANCELLED
and short-circuit — never posting a rejected draft."""
task = await _seed_draft(db_session)
client = _StubClient()
async def _win_the_race(_self: XPostService, _key: str) -> str:
task.status = TS.CANCELLED
await db_session.flush()
return "tok"
with (
patch("roboco.services.x_post_service.build_x_client", return_value=client),
patch.object(XPostService, "_acquire_lock", _win_the_race),
patch.object(XPostService, "_release_lock", AsyncMock(return_value=None)),
):
result = await _svc(db_session).approve(_id(task))
assert result is not None
assert result.status == "already_rejected"
assert client.calls == []
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_approve_concurrent_lock_held_returns_in_progress(
db_session: AsyncSession,
) -> None:
task = await _seed_draft(db_session)
with patch.object(XPostService, "_acquire_lock", AsyncMock(return_value=None)):
result = await _svc(db_session).approve(_id(task))
assert result is not None
assert result.status == "already_in_progress"
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_approve_unknown_task_returns_none(db_session: AsyncSession) -> None:
result = await _svc(db_session).approve(uuid4())
assert result is None
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_reject_records_reason_and_cancels(db_session: AsyncSession) -> None:
task = await _seed_draft(db_session, source=X_REPLY_SOURCE)
with _lock_free():
updated = await _svc(db_session).reject(
_id(task), "Tone doesn't match our voice"
)
assert updated is not None
assert updated.status == TS.CANCELLED
assert markers.get_x_reject_reason(updated) == "Tone doesn't match our voice"
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_reject_refused_while_lock_held_by_concurrent_approve(
db_session: AsyncSession,
) -> None:
"""A concurrent approve holds the post lock (mid-tweet-POST); reject must
fail closed instead of racing a CANCEL under it — previously reject()
never even attempted the lock, so it could commit CANCELLED to a draft a
concurrent approve was about to mark COMPLETED, or clobber the approve's
outcome depending on commit ordering."""
task = await _seed_draft(db_session)
with patch.object(XPostService, "_acquire_lock", AsyncMock(return_value=None)):
result = await _svc(db_session).reject(_id(task), "not relevant")
assert result is None
await db_session.refresh(task)
assert task.status == TS.PENDING
assert markers.get_x_reject_reason(task) is None
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_list_open_posts_excludes_terminal(db_session: AsyncSession) -> None:
open_task = await _seed_draft(db_session)
rejected_task = await _seed_draft(db_session, source=X_REPLY_SOURCE)
with _lock_free():
await _svc(db_session).reject(_id(rejected_task), "not relevant")
open_posts = await _svc(db_session).list_open_posts()
ids = {t.id for t in open_posts}
assert open_task.id in ids
assert rejected_task.id not in ids
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_approve_posts_feature_spotlight_draft(
db_session: AsyncSession,
) -> None:
"""The feature-spotlight source rides the same generic post path as
x_post/x_reply; it only branches for the best-effort video hook below
(a no-op here since this draft carries no x_feature_ref marker)."""
task = await _seed_draft(db_session, source=X_FEATURE_SOURCE)
client = _StubClient()
with (
patch("roboco.services.x_post_service.build_x_client", return_value=client),
patch.object(XPostService, "_acquire_lock", AsyncMock(return_value="tok")),
patch.object(XPostService, "_release_lock", AsyncMock(return_value=None)),
):
result = await _svc(db_session).approve(_id(task))
assert result is not None
assert result.status == "posted"
assert result.tweet_id == "999"
assert client.calls == ["Draft body"]
await db_session.refresh(task)
assert task.status == TS.COMPLETED
assert markers.get_x_posted_tweet_id(task) == "999"
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_list_open_posts_includes_feature_spotlight_source(
db_session: AsyncSession,
) -> None:
task = await _seed_draft(db_session, source=X_FEATURE_SOURCE)
open_posts = await _svc(db_session).list_open_posts()
ids = {t.id for t in open_posts}
assert task.id in ids
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_reject_completed_raises(db_session: AsyncSession) -> None:
"""An already-posted (COMPLETED) draft is live on X; rejecting it would
lie "cancelled (never posted)" while the tweet is public."""
task = await _seed_draft(db_session)
markers.set_x_posted_tweet_id(task, "999")
task.status = TS.COMPLETED
await db_session.flush()
with pytest.raises(TaskAlreadyCompletedError):
await _svc(db_session).reject(_id(task), "nope")
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_reject_concurrent_approve_completes_during_lock_wait(
db_session: AsyncSession, _test_database_url: str
) -> None:
"""Redis mutex pre-lock write audit regression for ``reject()``: a
genuinely concurrent approve (a real second session/connection) posts +
commits COMPLETED in the window between reject's pre-lock read and its
lock acquisition. The in-lock re-read must see that committed state and
refuse — the CANCELLED status write and reject reason must never land on
the just-posted row, proving the fix holds across sessions, not merely
within one. Mirrors
``test_approve_concurrent_edit_does_not_clobber_a_committed_post``."""
task = await _seed_draft(db_session)
task_id = _id(task)
await db_session.commit()
real_get = TaskService.get
injected = False
async def _get_then_inject_concurrent_post(
self: TaskService, tid: UUID
) -> TaskTable | None:
"""Fires once, right after reject's pre-lock read — the exact window
between that read and reject's own (would-be) pre-lock write."""
nonlocal injected
result = await real_get(self, tid)
if not injected:
injected = True
other, other_engine = await _fresh_session(_test_database_url)
try:
other_task = await other.get(TaskTable, tid)
assert other_task is not None
markers.set_x_posted_tweet_id(other_task, "concurrent-999")
other_task.status = TS.COMPLETED
await other.commit()
finally:
await _dispose(other, other_engine)
return result
with (
patch.object(TaskService, "get", _get_then_inject_concurrent_post),
patch.object(XPostService, "_acquire_lock", AsyncMock(return_value="tok")),
patch.object(XPostService, "_release_lock", AsyncMock(return_value=None)),
pytest.raises(TaskAlreadyCompletedError),
):
await _svc(db_session).reject(task_id, "Tone doesn't match")
fresh, fresh_engine = await _fresh_session(_test_database_url)
try:
final = await fresh.get(TaskTable, task_id)
assert final is not None
assert final.status == TS.COMPLETED
assert markers.get_x_posted_tweet_id(final) == "concurrent-999"
# The reject must never have landed on the just-posted row.
assert markers.get_x_reject_reason(final) is None
finally:
await _dispose(fresh, fresh_engine)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_list_post_history_excludes_open_drafts(
db_session: AsyncSession,
) -> None:
open_task = await _seed_draft(db_session)
rejected_task = await _seed_draft(db_session, source=X_REPLY_SOURCE)
with _lock_free():
await _svc(db_session).reject(_id(rejected_task), "not relevant")
history = await _svc(db_session).list_post_history()
ids = {t.id for t in history}
assert rejected_task.id in ids
assert open_task.id not in ids
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_list_post_history_newest_acted_first(
db_session: AsyncSession,
) -> None:
rejected_task = await _seed_draft(db_session, source=X_REPLY_SOURCE)
with _lock_free():
await _svc(db_session).reject(_id(rejected_task), "not relevant")
posted_task = await _seed_draft(db_session)
client = _StubClient()
with (
patch("roboco.services.x_post_service.build_x_client", return_value=client),
patch.object(XPostService, "_acquire_lock", AsyncMock(return_value="tok")),
patch.object(XPostService, "_release_lock", AsyncMock(return_value=None)),
):
await _svc(db_session).approve(_id(posted_task))
history = await _svc(db_session).list_post_history()
ids = [t.id for t in history]
assert ids.index(posted_task.id) < ids.index(rejected_task.id)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_list_post_history_includes_marker_fields(
db_session: AsyncSession,
) -> None:
posted_task = await _seed_draft(db_session)
client = _StubClient(tweet_id="777")
with (
patch("roboco.services.x_post_service.build_x_client", return_value=client),
patch.object(XPostService, "_acquire_lock", AsyncMock(return_value="tok")),
patch.object(XPostService, "_release_lock", AsyncMock(return_value=None)),
):
await _svc(db_session).approve(_id(posted_task))
rejected_task = await _seed_draft(db_session, source=X_REPLY_SOURCE)
with _lock_free():
await _svc(db_session).reject(_id(rejected_task), "off-brand tone")
history = await _svc(db_session).list_post_history()
by_id = {t.id: t for t in history}
assert markers.get_x_posted_tweet_id(by_id[posted_task.id]) == "777"
assert markers.get_x_reject_reason(by_id[rejected_task.id]) == "off-brand tone"
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_list_post_history_respects_limit(db_session: AsyncSession) -> None:
tasks = []
for _ in range(3):
t = await _seed_draft(db_session, source=X_REPLY_SOURCE)
with _lock_free():
await _svc(db_session).reject(_id(t), "not relevant")
tasks.append(t)
history = await _svc(db_session).list_post_history(limit=2)
assert len(history) == TWO
ids = {t.id for t in history}
assert tasks[2].id in ids
assert tasks[1].id in ids
assert tasks[0].id not in ids
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_approve_does_not_flush_edited_body_before_lock(
db_session: AsyncSession,
) -> None:
"""The CEO's edit must land on the re-read locked row INSIDE the critical
section, after the COMPLETED check — never on the pre-lock row. A concurrent
approve that already posted (locked row COMPLETED) must not have this edit
overwrite the just-posted task's stored body."""
task = await _seed_draft(db_session, body="Original")
original_body = markers.get_x_draft_body(task)
async def _already_posted_locked(
_self: XPostService, _task_id: UUID, _task: TaskTable, _trimmed: str | None
) -> XPostExecuteResult:
return XPostExecuteResult(
status="already_posted",
tweet_id="111",
detail="this draft was already posted",
)
with (
patch.object(XPostService, "_acquire_lock", AsyncMock(return_value="tok")),
patch.object(XPostService, "_release_lock", AsyncMock(return_value=None)),
patch.object(XPostService, "_approve_locked", _already_posted_locked),
):
result = await _svc(db_session).approve(_id(task), "new body")
assert result is not None
assert result.status == "already_posted"
await db_session.refresh(task)
assert markers.get_x_draft_body(task) == original_body
async def _fresh_session(url: str) -> tuple[AsyncSession, AsyncEngine]:
"""A session on a brand-new engine/connection (caller disposes)."""
engine = create_async_engine(url, future=True)
factory = async_sessionmaker(
bind=engine, class_=AsyncSession, expire_on_commit=False
)
return factory(), engine
async def _dispose(session: AsyncSession, engine: AsyncEngine) -> None:
with contextlib.suppress(Exception):
await session.rollback()
await engine.dispose()
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_approve_concurrent_edit_does_not_clobber_a_committed_post(
db_session: AsyncSession, _test_database_url: str
) -> None:
"""Redis mutex pre-lock write audit regression: a genuinely concurrent
approve (a real second session/connection, not an in-process mock) posts
+ commits COMPLETED in the window between our pre-lock read and our lock
acquisition. The in-lock re-read must see that committed state and the
CEO's edited body must never land on the just-posted row — proving the
fix holds across sessions, not merely within one, mirroring
VideoPostService's identical cross-session regression test."""
task = await _seed_draft(db_session, body="Original")
task_id = _id(task)
await db_session.commit()
real_get = TaskService.get
injected = False
async def _get_then_inject_concurrent_post(
self: TaskService, tid: UUID
) -> TaskTable | None:
"""Fires once, right after the outer pre-lock read — the exact
window between our read and our own (would-be) pre-lock write."""
nonlocal injected
result = await real_get(self, tid)
if not injected:
injected = True
other, other_engine = await _fresh_session(_test_database_url)
try:
other_task = await other.get(TaskTable, tid)
assert other_task is not None
markers.set_x_posted_tweet_id(other_task, "concurrent-999")
other_task.status = TS.COMPLETED
await other.commit()
finally:
await _dispose(other, other_engine)
return result
client = _StubClient()
with (
patch("roboco.services.x_post_service.build_x_client", return_value=client),
patch.object(TaskService, "get", _get_then_inject_concurrent_post),
patch.object(XPostService, "_acquire_lock", AsyncMock(return_value="tok")),
patch.object(XPostService, "_release_lock", AsyncMock(return_value=None)),
):
result = await _svc(db_session).approve(task_id, "Edited body")
assert result is not None
assert result.status == "already_posted"
assert result.tweet_id == "concurrent-999"
# No double-post: the concurrently-committed tweet wins, ours never fires.
assert client.calls == []
fresh, fresh_engine = await _fresh_session(_test_database_url)
try:
final = await fresh.get(TaskTable, task_id)
assert final is not None
assert final.status == TS.COMPLETED
assert markers.get_x_posted_tweet_id(final) == "concurrent-999"
# The edit must never have landed on the just-posted row.
assert markers.get_x_draft_body(final) == "Original"
finally:
await _dispose(fresh, fresh_engine)
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
# Spotlight video hook (Task 4, 2026-07-09 pipeline fixes): moved from
# authoring time (propose_feature_spotlight) to this posted-success branch so
# a ux-dev never burns a cycle on a spotlight the CEO then rejects.
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_approve_feature_spotlight_with_video_opens_video_task(
db_session: AsyncSession, monkeypatch: pytest.MonkeyPatch
) -> None:
_enable_video(monkeypatch)
task = await _seed_feature_draft(db_session, video_script="Custom voiceover script")
client = _StubClient()
video_engine = AsyncMock()
video_engine.open_video_task = AsyncMock(return_value=None)
with (
patch("roboco.services.x_post_service.build_x_client", return_value=client),
patch.object(XPostService, "_acquire_lock", AsyncMock(return_value="tok")),
patch.object(XPostService, "_release_lock", AsyncMock(return_value=None)),
patch(
"roboco.services.video_engine.get_video_engine",
return_value=video_engine,
),
):
result = await _svc(db_session).approve(_id(task))
assert result is not None
assert result.status == "posted"
video_engine.open_video_task.assert_awaited_once()
kwargs = video_engine.open_video_task.call_args.kwargs
assert kwargs["occasion"] == "spotlight org-memory"
assert kwargs["platforms"] == ["x", "tiktok"]
assert kwargs["script"] == "Custom voiceover script"
assert kwargs["brief"] == "Organizational Memory Loop: Draft body"
# The spotlight's own project scopes the video authoring — without it the
# video authored against the deployment-anchor project regardless.
assert kwargs["project_id"] == task.project_id
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_approve_feature_spotlight_video_falls_back_to_brief_script(
db_session: AsyncSession, monkeypatch: pytest.MonkeyPatch
) -> None:
"""No explicit video_script -> script falls back to the brief, mirroring
the fallback the authoring-time hook used to do."""
_enable_video(monkeypatch)
task = await _seed_feature_draft(db_session)
client = _StubClient()
video_engine = AsyncMock()
video_engine.open_video_task = AsyncMock(return_value=None)
with (
patch("roboco.services.x_post_service.build_x_client", return_value=client),
patch.object(XPostService, "_acquire_lock", AsyncMock(return_value="tok")),
patch.object(XPostService, "_release_lock", AsyncMock(return_value=None)),
patch(
"roboco.services.video_engine.get_video_engine",
return_value=video_engine,
),
):
result = await _svc(db_session).approve(_id(task))
assert result is not None
assert result.status == "posted"
kwargs = video_engine.open_video_task.call_args.kwargs
expected_brief = "Organizational Memory Loop: Draft body"
assert kwargs["script"] == expected_brief
assert kwargs["brief"] == expected_brief
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_approve_feature_spotlight_reapprove_does_not_reopen_video(
db_session: AsyncSession, monkeypatch: pytest.MonkeyPatch
) -> None:
"""Idempotent re-approve: the second call short-circuits on the already-
COMPLETED check before ever reaching _post/_open_spotlight_video again."""
_enable_video(monkeypatch)
task = await _seed_feature_draft(db_session)
client = _StubClient()
video_engine = AsyncMock()
video_engine.open_video_task = AsyncMock(return_value=None)
with (
patch("roboco.services.x_post_service.build_x_client", return_value=client),
patch.object(XPostService, "_acquire_lock", AsyncMock(return_value="tok")),
patch.object(XPostService, "_release_lock", AsyncMock(return_value=None)),
patch(
"roboco.services.video_engine.get_video_engine",
return_value=video_engine,
),
):
svc = _svc(db_session)
first = await svc.approve(_id(task))
second = await svc.approve(_id(task))
assert first is not None
assert first.status == "posted"
assert second is not None
assert second.status == "already_posted"
video_engine.open_video_task.assert_awaited_once()
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_approve_plain_x_post_never_opens_video(
db_session: AsyncSession, monkeypatch: pytest.MonkeyPatch
) -> None:
"""A plain x_post draft carries no x_feature_ref, so the source check
alone keeps the video hook from ever firing for it."""
_enable_video(monkeypatch)
task = await _seed_draft(db_session, source=X_POST_SOURCE)
client = _StubClient()
video_engine = AsyncMock()
video_engine.open_video_task = AsyncMock(return_value=None)
with (
patch("roboco.services.x_post_service.build_x_client", return_value=client),
patch.object(XPostService, "_acquire_lock", AsyncMock(return_value="tok")),
patch.object(XPostService, "_release_lock", AsyncMock(return_value=None)),
patch(
"roboco.services.video_engine.get_video_engine",
return_value=video_engine,
),
):
result = await _svc(db_session).approve(_id(task))
assert result is not None
assert result.status == "posted"
video_engine.open_video_task.assert_not_called()
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_reject_feature_spotlight_with_wants_video_opens_none(
db_session: AsyncSession, monkeypatch: pytest.MonkeyPatch
) -> None:
"""Rejecting a spotlight draft never posts, so the video hook (which only
fires from the posted-success branch of _post) never runs either."""
_enable_video(monkeypatch)
task = await _seed_feature_draft(db_session)
video_engine = AsyncMock()
video_engine.open_video_task = AsyncMock(return_value=None)
with (
patch(
"roboco.services.video_engine.get_video_engine",
return_value=video_engine,
),
_lock_free(),
):
updated = await _svc(db_session).reject(_id(task), "not on-brand")
assert updated is not None
assert updated.status == TS.CANCELLED
video_engine.open_video_task.assert_not_called()
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_approve_feature_spotlight_video_flags_off_skips(
db_session: AsyncSession, monkeypatch: pytest.MonkeyPatch
) -> None:
monkeypatch.setattr(cfg, "video_engine_enabled", False)
monkeypatch.setattr(cfg, "video_on_spotlight", False)
task = await _seed_feature_draft(db_session)
client = _StubClient()
video_engine = AsyncMock()
video_engine.open_video_task = AsyncMock(return_value=None)
with (
patch("roboco.services.x_post_service.build_x_client", return_value=client),
patch.object(XPostService, "_acquire_lock", AsyncMock(return_value="tok")),
patch.object(XPostService, "_release_lock", AsyncMock(return_value=None)),
patch(
"roboco.services.video_engine.get_video_engine",
return_value=video_engine,
),
):
result = await _svc(db_session).approve(_id(task))
assert result is not None
assert result.status == "posted"
video_engine.open_video_task.assert_not_called()
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_approve_feature_spotlight_without_wants_video_skips(
db_session: AsyncSession, monkeypatch: pytest.MonkeyPatch
) -> None:
"""Flags on but the draft's author didn't request a video (wants_video
absent/False on the marker) -> no video task, distinct from the
flags-off case above."""
_enable_video(monkeypatch)
task = await _seed_feature_draft(db_session, wants_video=False)
client = _StubClient()
video_engine = AsyncMock()
video_engine.open_video_task = AsyncMock(return_value=None)
with (
patch("roboco.services.x_post_service.build_x_client", return_value=client),
patch.object(XPostService, "_acquire_lock", AsyncMock(return_value="tok")),
patch.object(XPostService, "_release_lock", AsyncMock(return_value=None)),
patch(
"roboco.services.video_engine.get_video_engine",
return_value=video_engine,
),
):
result = await _svc(db_session).approve(_id(task))
assert result is not None
assert result.status == "posted"
video_engine.open_video_task.assert_not_called()
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_approve_feature_spotlight_video_failure_does_not_break_post(
db_session: AsyncSession, monkeypatch: pytest.MonkeyPatch
) -> None:
"""Best-effort: a video-engine blow-up must not affect the already-
succeeded post."""
_enable_video(monkeypatch)
task = await _seed_feature_draft(db_session)
client = _StubClient()
with (
patch("roboco.services.x_post_service.build_x_client", return_value=client),
patch.object(XPostService, "_acquire_lock", AsyncMock(return_value="tok")),
patch.object(XPostService, "_release_lock", AsyncMock(return_value=None)),
patch(
"roboco.services.video_engine.get_video_engine",
side_effect=RuntimeError("video-engine boom"),
),
):
result = await _svc(db_session).approve(_id(task))
assert result is not None
assert result.status == "posted"
await db_session.refresh(task)
assert task.status == TS.COMPLETED