15a3e87a2f feat(vault): Obsidian vault V1 — projection core, Auditor narrative, input loop (#458)
* fix(gateway): gate review diffs against the task's real parent branch (#444)

The in-path PR-review gate's evidence diff (claim_gate_review) and the
pr_pass conventions guard derived their diff base via parent_branch_for
string surgery, which reuses the child branch's own team segment — wrong
for every cross-team hop (a frontend child of a main_pm root derives a
ref that never existed) and silently falls back to the repo default
branch, so the reviewer judged the entire inherited base-branch content
as the task's own work and failed acceptance criteria the task never
touched. Bounced a live goals-tab fix three times, unfixable by branch
surgery.

The gate now resolves the base via resolve_parent_branch (the parent
task's recorded branch_name, cross-team correct) and threads it as a new
preferred_parent override through git.diff / list_changed_files /
conventions_check_for_task — consulted only when no explicit base is
given, so the pinned literal-base contract (base="HEAD~1") and every
other diff caller (QA, doc, content) are byte-identical. Parent lookup
fails open (derived-base fallback) like the other resolve_parent_branch
call sites, and is skipped entirely while the conventions flag is off.

Also excludes .uv-cache/ and .claude/ (agent worktrees, private uv
cache) from the markdown prose scanner — both are repo-local tool dirs
whose vendored/generated files tripped make reflow-check.

Co-authored-by: Renn F <rennf93@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(vault): Obsidian vault V1 — projection core + input loop

The vault is a rebuildable projection of the DB (never a source of
truth), default-off behind ROBOCO_OBSIDIAN_VAULT_ENABLED + ROBOCO_VAULT_PATH.

Projection core: VaultWriter materializes tasks/journals/A2A/agents as
wikilinked markdown (id-suffixed stable filenames, alias-based links so
renames never break, is_private journals excluded like the RAG corpus);
event seams materialize on journal write and A2A send and touch task-note
frontmatter at the status-transition chokepoint — all best-effort, a
vault failure never blocks a verb. Shipped .obsidian config (Dataview,
Kanban, team/status graph groups) + _meta dashboards; python -m
roboco.vault rebuild/relocate (rebuild preserves the narrative section).

Auditor narrative duty: curate_vault content verb (auditor-only,
playbook-curation pattern) spawned by a dedicated root-completion hook
with its own cooldown — fully separate from _dispatch_audit_work, whose
scheduled-sweep/alert-producer revival belongs to the queued fleet task.

Input loop: VaultIntakeEngine (ROBOCO_VAULT_INTAKE_*) watches the
intake folder for #roboco-tagged notes and materializes each as ONE held
draft (confirmed_by_human=False, Secretary-owned, source=vault_note,
excluded by the dispatchers via _is_held_ceo_source) with local-model
extraction and a deterministic fallback; vault_seen_notes ledger
(migration 070) keyed on path+content-hash (the CEO-feedback callout is
stripped before hashing so the engine's own append never self-triggers);
per-cycle and open-draft caps. Nothing auto-starts.

* fix(vault): integrate with master — re-chain migration 070 onto 069, mypy-clean tests

The vault branch was cut from slave before the sequence-gate promotion,
so migration 070 chained from 068 while master already carried 069 —
two heads on merge. Master is now merged in and 070 revises 069.
Vault test files also get mypy-clean mock idioms (monkeypatch.setattr
over method assignment; await_args narrowed before access).

* fix(scripts): dedupe SKIP_DIRS again after the master merge

Master still carries the twin-merge duplicate (its dedupe hotfix is an
unmerged PR); the merge re-imported it here.

* fix(vault): reflow hard-wrapped prose in the vault asset templates

* chore(config): exclude .uv-cache and .claude from deptry's scan scope

Same repo-local tool dirs the prose scanner skips; the standalone deptry
target walks the repo root and drowned in the cache's unpacked wheels.

* fix(vault): board-review activation path for vault drafts + relocate graft

The input loop's held-artifact posture was a dead end: vault_note drafts
were unconditionally held by _is_held_ceo_source, owned by the verbless
Secretary, hidden from the panel's approval surfaces by team, and the
open-drafts cap counted them forever — the engine self-bricked after ten
notes. Vault drafts now ride the intake board-review path instead: a
tagged note becomes a PENDING Product-Owner-assigned Board draft (the
exact confirm_live_draft board shape), the board reviews it, and only
the CEO's approve_and_start makes it deliverable — never-auto-starts now
rests on the board gate, proven by tests against the real dispatchers.
The cap counts only drafts still awaiting the CEO (team==BOARD,
non-terminal), so approval and cancellation both free it.

relocate into an existing personal vault now grafts old_root/RoboCo as a
direct child (refusing loudly if RoboCo/ already exists there) and adds
only absent .obsidian/_meta files — a personal vault's config is never
clobbered. An absent destination keeps the whole-tree move.

---------

Co-authored-by: Renn F <rennf93@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-11 03:17:59 +02:00
2026-07-10 10:25:21 +02:00
2026-07-10 10:25:21 +02:00
2026-07-10 10:25:21 +02:00

RoboCo

AI Agents Company - A virtual organization of 25 AI agents + 1 human CEO, designed to operate as a complete software development workforce.

Watch the 26-minute RoboCo intro on YouTube — what it is, a walkthrough, and how to use it
Watch the 26-min intro
what it is, a walkthrough, and how to use it
Watch the 2.5-hour Working with RoboCo build session on YouTube — taking a conversation all the way to a shipped feature
Watch the 2.5-hour build session
a conversation → a shipped feature

Twelve-second looping preview of the RoboCo control panel — the org tree, a task in progress, and an approval queue.
Watch the full 2:33 walkthrough (.mp4) →

Warning

RoboCo is early-stage, work-in-progress software (v0). It's under active development, runs in a homelab, and will have rough edges, breaking changes, and bugs. It is not production-ready and the API/database schema are not stable yet. Treat it as a working prototype to explore and build on — please don't expose it to the public internet as-is. Issues and PRs very welcome.

Tip

📚 Full documentation: docs.roboco.tech — install & first run, the company model, a page-by-page panel reference, model providers, the optional subsystems, deployment, and the API.

Overview

RoboCo implements a structured organizational hierarchy with formal communication protocols, task management, and quality controls. The system enables a single human (CEO) to orchestrate complex multi-project development at scale.

CEO (You, the human)
    │
    ├── Intake (on-demand interviewer: chats only with you to draft a task)
    ├── Secretary (on-demand chief-of-staff: reads company state, runs gated directives)
    ├── PR Reviewer (read-only main reviewer: inbound external/fork + internal PRs, and the root→master in-path gate)
    │
    └── Board (3 agents)
         ├── Product Owner
         ├── Head of Marketing
         └── Auditor (silent observer, reports to you)
              │
              └── Main PM (coordinates all cells)
                   │
                   ├── Backend Cell (6 agents: 2 Devs, 1 QA, 1 PM, 1 Documenter, 1 PR Reviewer)
                   ├── Frontend Cell (6 agents: 2 Devs, 1 QA, 1 PM, 1 Documenter, 1 PR Reviewer)
                   └── UX/UI Cell (6 agents: 2 Devs, 1 QA, 1 PM, 1 Documenter, 1 PR Reviewer)

The 25 agents = Intake + Secretary + PR Reviewer + the Board (3) + Main PM + the three 6-agent cells (18). Agents run on Anthropic Claude by default, or on xAI Grok (the official grok CLI on a SuperGrok subscription) — see the provider note under Configuration.

How it works

You hand a task to the company; it runs through a real build → review → document → merge pipeline and comes back to you to approve.

One full loop, put simply:

  1. You give the Board a task — they review it. The Product Owner and Head of Marketing turn your ask into requirements and acceptance criteria.
  2. You approve — the Main PM starts the work. A notification asks for your Approve & Start decision; approve, and the Main PM breaks it into per-cell subtasks.
  3. Each cell's PM delegates, supports, and triages its developers (UX/UI, Frontend, Backend).
  4. Developers build it, QA verifies and gates it, Documenters keep the books.
  5. Cell PMs merge their PRs into the Main PM's branch.
  6. The Main PM opens the final PR and notifies you "It's done!" — you approve and merge, or send it back for rework. (Only you ever merge to master.)

— Full circle —

See the full walkthrough, with screenshots →

Or watch the full panel walkthrough (video) →

Project Structure

roboco/
├── roboco/                      # Main Python package
│   ├── api/                     # FastAPI routes & schemas
│   │   ├── routes/              # API endpoints (tasks, git, agents, etc.)
│   │   └── schemas/             # Pydantic request/response models
│   ├── services/                # Business logic services
│   │   ├── task.py              # Task lifecycle management
│   │   ├── workspace.py         # Multi-agent workspace management
│   │   ├── messaging.py         # Agent communication
│   │   └── optimal.py           # RAG/Knowledge base (in-house pgvector)
│   ├── models/                  # Pydantic domain models
│   ├── db/                      # SQLAlchemy ORM & session
│   ├── enforcement/             # Task lifecycle state machine
│   ├── runtime/                 # Orchestrator for agent spawning
│   ├── agents/                  # Agent base classes
│   ├── mcp/                     # MCP server implementations
│   └── config.py                # Application configuration
├── agents/
│   └── prompts/                 # Agent system prompts (roles, teams, identities)
├── docs/
│   ├── rag/                     # Agent knowledge base (indexed into RAG)
│   └── map/                     # Exhaustive codebase map (agent-facing)
├── alembic/                     # Database migrations
├── CLAUDE.md                    # Claude Code guidance
├── docker-compose.yml           # Full stack, built from source
└── docker-compose.registry.yml  # Full stack, pulled from the image registry

Running RoboCo

You need Docker + Docker Compose and a Claude Code auth directory on the host (~/.claude, mounted into the orchestrator so agents can reach the model). Copy .env.example to .env and set at least ROBOCO_ENCRYPTION_KEY and ROBOCO_AGENT_AUTH_SECRET (that file shows how to generate each). However you start it, the whole company is reachable at one origin: http://localhost:3000.

Optional — run agents on xAI Grok instead of Claude. RoboCo can spawn agents on xAI's official grok CLI authenticated by a SuperGrok subscription (no metered API key). Run grok login once on the host and point ROBOCO_HOST_GROK_DIR at the resulting ~/.grok so it mounts into Grok agents; the orchestrator keeps the ~6h token refreshed for you. See the Grok block in .env.example (ROBOCO_HOST_GROK_DIR, ROBOCO_GROK_AGENT_IMAGE, ROBOCO_GROK_CLI_MODEL, ROBOCO_GROK_REASONING_EFFORT).

Option 1 — Run the pre-built images (quickest)

Every release publishes all RoboCo images to both the GitHub Container Registry and Docker Hub, so you can run the full stack without building anything. Use the registry compose:

git clone https://github.com/rennf93/roboco.git && cd roboco
cp .env.example .env                                   # then edit in your secrets
docker compose -f docker-compose.registry.yml pull
docker compose -f docker-compose.registry.yml up -d

Choose the registry and version with two env vars (defaults shown):

ROBOCO_REGISTRY=ghcr.io/rennf93   # or docker.io/renzof93
ROBOCO_VERSION=latest             # or a pinned release, e.g. 0.15.0

The orchestrator spawns the matching pre-built agent images on demand — no build toolchain or source compile on your host.

Option 2 — Build from source

The same full stack, built locally from the Dockerfiles instead of pulled:

git clone https://github.com/rennf93/roboco.git && cd roboco
cp .env.example .env              # then edit in your secrets
docker compose up -d              # builds images on first run, then starts everything

Option 3 — Local development (no full stack)

For hacking on the code itself, run only the backing services in Docker and the API on your host. RoboCo's own code requires Python 3.13+ (uv will fetch it if needed):

uv sync
docker compose up -d postgres redis ollama   # backing services only
uv run alembic upgrade head                   # migrate the database
uv run python -m roboco.cli                   # API + orchestrator

# Or just the API without the orchestrator:
uv run uvicorn roboco.api.app:app --reload --host 0.0.0.0 --port 8000

Configuration

Key environment variables (see roboco/config.py for all options):

# API Server
ROBOCO_HOST=0.0.0.0
ROBOCO_PORT=8000

# Database
ROBOCO_DATABASE_HOST=localhost
ROBOCO_DATABASE_PORT=5432
ROBOCO_DATABASE_NAME=roboco

# Workspaces (Multi-Agent Git)
ROBOCO_WORKSPACES_ROOT=/data/workspaces
ROBOCO_WORKSPACE_AUTO_CLONE=true

# RAG/LLM
ROBOCO_LOCAL_LLM_BASE_URL=http://roboco-ollama:11434/v1
ROBOCO_LOCAL_LLM_MODEL=glm-5.2:cloud

# Feature flags (default-off unless noted; toggle from Settings → Feature Flags)
ROBOCO_CONVENTIONS_ENABLED=false        # per-project architectural conventions standard
ROBOCO_TOOLCHAIN_MATCH_ENABLED=false    # build each target project under its own Python
ROBOCO_OVERLOAD_BREAK_ENABLED=true      # park a provider on a persistent model-API overload

Multi-Agent Workspace Structure

Each agent gets their own git clone for parallel development:

{ROBOCO_WORKSPACES_ROOT}/
└── {project-slug}/
    └── {team}/
        └── {agent-slug}/
            └── [git repository]

Example:
/data/workspaces/roboco/backend/be-dev-1/
/data/workspaces/roboco/backend/be-dev-2/

Task Lifecycle

backlog → pending → claimed → in_progress → verifying → awaiting_qa
    ↓                              ↓              ↓           ↓
cancelled                      blocked      needs_revision   awaiting_documentation
                               paused                              ↓
                                                           awaiting_pm_review
                                                                   ↓
                                                           awaiting_ceo_approval
                                                                   ↓
                                                              completed

Assembled, PR-bearing tasks pass through one extra stage — the in-path PR-review gate — before the PM merges:

in_progress → awaiting_pr_review → awaiting_pm_review
   (submit_up /      (pr_pass)
    submit_root)     (pr_fail → needs_revision)

The cell PM's submit_up (cell→root PR) and the Main PM's submit_root (root→master PR) open the assembled PR and enter the gate; a PR reviewer pr_passes it on to the PM merge or pr_fails it back. Leaf dev tasks (reviewed by QA) and branchless coordination roots skip the gate.

API Endpoints

Domain routes are mounted under /api:

Route Group Description
/api/tasks Task CRUD, lifecycle, claiming
/api/agents Agent management
/api/git Git operations (status, commit, push, PR)
/api/sessions Communication sessions
/api/messages Agent messages
/api/projects Project (repo) management
/api/work-sessions Git work session tracking
/api/optimal RAG/Knowledge base queries
/api/journals Agent journals/reflections
/api/orchestrator/status Orchestrator / dispatcher status

The agent gateway verbs are served separately under /api/v1/flow/{role}/{verb} (intent verbs) and /api/v1/do (content tools) — see the Agent Gateway.

Development

# Install dev dependencies
uv sync --all-extras

# Run tests
uv run pytest

# Format and lint
uv run ruff format .
uv run ruff check .
uv run mypy roboco/

# Type checking
uv run mypy roboco/

Core Principles

  1. Everything is a task - All work is tracked and documented
  2. No work without a task - Create task record first
  3. No task without acceptance criteria - How do we know it's done?
  4. No closure without documentation - Future agents need context
  5. Communication is constant - Stream reasoning, log everything
  6. The Auditor sees all - Quality monitored silently
  7. CEO approves major changes - Human-in-the-loop for critical decisions

Technology Stack

Layer Technology
API Framework FastAPI
Database PostgreSQL + SQLAlchemy (async)
Vector Store PostgreSQL + pgvector (in-house engine)
Cache/Queue Redis
RAG Engine in-house (asyncpg + pgvector, hybrid retrieval)
Embeddings qwen3-embedding:0.6b (Ollama)
Local LLM Ollama (glm-5.2:cloud)
Cloud LLM Claude API (Anthropic) + xAI Grok (official grok CLI, SuperGrok subscription)
Package Manager uv

Status

Core Infrastructure (Complete)

  • Data models (Pydantic)
  • Database ORM (SQLAlchemy async)
  • Task lifecycle state machine
  • Multi-agent workspace management
  • Agent prompts (25 agents)
  • Messaging API
  • Task API with full lifecycle
  • Git operations API
  • RAG/Knowledge base (in-house pgvector engine)
  • Agent orchestrator
  • CEO approval workflow
  • Pluggable agent providers (Claude Code + xAI Grok on the official grok CLI)
  • Inbound PR review (read-only PR-reviewer + CEO supersede/dismiss queue)
  • Self-healing CI loop for RoboCo's own repo (default-off, CEO-gated)
  • Business Goals tab with a live Company Scorecard (delivery, spend-vs-budget, lead time)

In Progress

  • Frontend panel (vendored under panel/, served through nginx on :3000)
  • Full agent autonomy testing

Security

Important

Do not expose RoboCo to the public internet as-is. It is designed to run on a trusted private network (homelab / LAN).

Agent authentication. Requests identify the caller with X-Agent-Id / X-Agent-Role headers. The orchestrator issues each spawned agent an HMAC token (X-Agent-Token, signed with ROBOCO_AGENT_AUTH_SECRET) that binds its id, role and team. Token enforcement is gated by ROBOCO_AGENT_AUTH_REQUIRED:

  • ROBOCO_AGENT_AUTH_REQUIRED unset/false (default): header-trust mode — the role headers are accepted without a token, so any client that can reach the API may claim any role (including ceo). The API logs a warning at startup in this mode. Acceptable only on a trusted network.
  • ROBOCO_AGENT_AUTH_REQUIRED=true: every request must carry a valid token; an agent cannot spoof another agent's role. The control panel keeps working because nginx — the only trusted hop between the browser and the API — injects the CEO token (X-Agent-Token) on /api and /ws, so the browser never holds the signing secret. Generate that token with make panel-token and set it as ROBOCO_PANEL_AGENT_TOKEN in .env before enabling secure mode.

WebSocket streams. Token enforcement is currently REST-only. The /ws/* endpoints authenticate by agent_id query param at most and do not yet validate X-Agent-Token, even in secure mode — nginx injects the token so the panel works, but a direct WebSocket connection that bypasses nginx is not rejected. In particular the operator stream /ws/system (rate-limit lifecycle + token-usage snapshots for the dashboard) is unauthenticated. These streams are read-only — no control surface, secrets, or task content — but treat the orchestrator port as trusted-network-only until WebSocket auth lands.

Secrets (the Fernet ROBOCO_ENCRYPTION_KEY, GitHub PATs) live encrypted in the database and in gitignored env files — never in the repo. Per-project git tokens are Fernet-encrypted at rest and never returned by the API.

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Renzo Franceschini

RoboCo is licensed under the GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 (AGPL-3.0). See LICENSE for the full text.

The AGPL's network-use clause (section 13) means that if you run a modified version of RoboCo as a network service, you must make your modified source available to its users. This keeps the project open while preventing closed, hosted re-distributions.

Contributing

Contributions are welcome. All contributors must sign the Contributor License Agreement (CLA.md) — this is automated on your first pull request. See CONTRIBUTING.md for the workflow and why the CLA exists.

S
Description
No description provided
Readme AGPL-3.0
100 MiB
Languages
Python 80.8%
TypeScript 17%
HTML 0.8%
Shell 0.6%
JavaScript 0.3%
Other 0.5%