* fix(mcp): delegate tool carries the collision surface the B1a gate demands
TASK_AT_DELEGATE (5fc85419) requires intends_to_touch on code delegations,
but the MCP delegate tool never gained the parameter — PMs were rejected
with incomplete_input and could never comply (live fleet-wide delegation
wall, 2026-07-02). Adds intends_to_touch / adds_migration / touches_shared /
depends_on to the tool and forwards them; parity test locks the invariant.
* fix(git): assembly-integrity guard accepts squash-merged children
git cherry patch-matches each child commit individually, so a squash merge
(N patches -> one commit, new patch-id) read as 'work missing' and the #11
guard refused every legitimate submit_up (live 2026-07-02: S6 cell, three
squash-merged children at the branch tip). A parent commit carrying the
child's [taskid8] prefix now proves the child landed; children with no
marker stay flagged — the original incident the guard exists for.
* fix(git): diff head prefers origin when the local ref is behind it
Assembled branches advance on ORIGIN as child PRs squash-merge on GitHub,
but _resolve_head_ref preferred the inspecting clone's parked local ref —
the PR-gate reviewer's evidence diff was built from a pre-merge snapshot
and re-flagged work that had already landed (two false pr_fail verdicts
on the S6 cell PR, live 2026-07-02). When both refs exist and the local
ref is strictly behind origin, resolve to origin/<branch>; local-ahead
(unpushed) and diverged refs keep priority, single-ref cases unchanged.
* test(mcp): plan-gate fields must be tool parameters (parity class lock)
Extends the delegate parity test to every choreographer plan-depth gate:
a gate that can reject with missing=[field] must name only fields the
corresponding MCP tool can send, else the agent can never comply.
* perf(api): wire TaskSummaryResponse into a bounded /tasks/summary route
The panel fetched /api/tasks unbounded and full-fat — 2MB per refresh
measured live (2026-07-02), ~21KB/task, and the trimmed
TaskSummaryResponse was dead code. /tasks/summary returns exactly the
fields list views render (~50x lighter); the status-only branch of
/tasks now honors its limit, and the eleven unbounded task list routes
are capped.
* perf(panel): kill the per-page request flood and fat payloads
Every page load funneled ~85 default-prefetch RSC requests + 665KB of
images + the 2MB task list through the browser's six HTTP/1.1
connections — real data calls queued ~2s before being sent (measured
via Playwright resource timing, 2026-07-02).
- prefetch={false} on all 59 Links (sidebar, task rows, kanban cards,
list rows) — ~85 requests/refresh down to a handful
- icon/apple-icon/logo resized to render size: 665KB -> 54KB; unused
219KB PNG removed
- task list fetches the trimmed /tasks/summary (2MB -> ~100KB),
normalized into the Task shape so list consumers keep their types
- ReactQueryDevtools rendered only in development
* fix(api): Annotated limit defaults so direct-call tests get real ints
Query(...) positional defaults arrive as Query objects when a route
function is invoked outside the HTTP layer (integration tests call
handlers directly) and broke the new [:limit] slices.
* fix(api,panel): summary carries completed_at + board_review_complete
The metrics page computes velocity client-side from completed_at and the
CEO approval queue gates on board_review_complete — both were nulled by
the summary normalizer, so Completed Today/Week read 0 against 63 real
completions and approved-board tasks could vanish from the queue. The
queue also renders quick_context, so it fetches the full list (small,
status-scoped) via tasksApi.listFull instead of the summary.
* fix(runtime): spawn manifest workspace_path follows the task's project
_build_manifest_for_agent hardcoded the roboco project workspace for
every agent; a guard-core task's manifest claimed /data/workspaces/roboco
while the container cwd sat in the task worktree. The manifest now takes
the same _resolve_workspace_cwd the container -w uses — one resolver,
both surfaces agree by construction.
* fix(runtime): respawn breaker catches status ping-pong loops
Any status CHANGE fully reset the strike counter, so a blocked <->
in_progress oscillation — which changes status on every spawn while
advancing nothing — never tripped the gate (live 2026-07-02: 8 spawns
over two hours). A status never seen on the (agent, task) still fully
resets; a REVISITED status gets a bounded reset budget mirroring
tracing_resets, after which strikes accrue and the gate fires.
* fix(runtime): unassigned-QA dispatch spawns without pre-claiming
The transitioning pre-claim moved awaiting_qa -> claimed before the QA
agent existed; the spawned agent's claim_review/pass_review both demand
awaiting_qa, so it bounced twice and unclaimed (live 2026-07-02,
ba7b751c). Matches _spawn_assigned_qa and the external-PR reviewer
dispatch: no pre-claim, the agent claims itself via claim_review.
* fix(tests): narrow await_args before kwargs access (mypy union-attr)
* Minor upgrades
* fix(policy): team-match gate gains org-wide exemption; resume/unblock/activate now team-matched
needs_team_match sat in its permissive fallback since shipping (no
caller supplied Context.agent_team) and three PM verbs opted out
entirely — a misrouted frontend cell PM blocked, escalated, and held a
backend task through exactly that gap (live 2026-07-02). Org-wide roles
(main_pm, board, CEO, PR reviewer) are exempt so escalation handling
and root-PR gating keep working; cell-scoped roles are now enforced
wherever the caller supplies the team.
---------
Co-authored-by: Renn F <rennf93@users.noreply.github.com>
RoboCo
AI Agents Company - A virtual organization of 25 AI agents + 1 human CEO, designed to operate as a complete software development workforce.
▶ Watch the 26-min intro what it is, a walkthrough, and how to use it |
▶ Watch the 2.5-hour build session a conversation → a shipped feature |
Watch the full 2:33 walkthrough (.mp4) →
Warning
RoboCo is early-stage, work-in-progress software (v0). It's under active development, runs in a homelab, and will have rough edges, breaking changes, and bugs. It is not production-ready and the API/database schema are not stable yet. Treat it as a working prototype to explore and build on — please don't expose it to the public internet as-is. Issues and PRs very welcome.
Tip
📚 Full documentation: docs.roboco.tech — install & first run, the company model, a page-by-page panel reference, model providers, the optional subsystems, deployment, and the API.
Overview
RoboCo implements a structured organizational hierarchy with formal communication protocols, task management, and quality controls. The system enables a single human (CEO) to orchestrate complex multi-project development at scale.
CEO (You, the human)
│
├── Intake (on-demand interviewer: chats only with you to draft a task)
├── Secretary (on-demand chief-of-staff: reads company state, runs gated directives)
├── PR Reviewer (read-only main reviewer: inbound external/fork + internal PRs, and the root→master in-path gate)
│
└── Board (3 agents)
├── Product Owner
├── Head of Marketing
└── Auditor (silent observer, reports to you)
│
└── Main PM (coordinates all cells)
│
├── Backend Cell (6 agents: 2 Devs, 1 QA, 1 PM, 1 Documenter, 1 PR Reviewer)
├── Frontend Cell (6 agents: 2 Devs, 1 QA, 1 PM, 1 Documenter, 1 PR Reviewer)
└── UX/UI Cell (6 agents: 2 Devs, 1 QA, 1 PM, 1 Documenter, 1 PR Reviewer)
The 25 agents = Intake + Secretary + PR Reviewer + the Board (3) + Main PM + the three 6-agent cells (18). Agents run on Anthropic Claude by default, or on xAI Grok (the official grok CLI on a SuperGrok subscription) — see the provider note under Configuration.
How it works
You hand a task to the company; it runs through a real build → review → document → merge pipeline and comes back to you to approve.
One full loop, put simply:
- You give the Board a task — they review it. The Product Owner and Head of Marketing turn your ask into requirements and acceptance criteria.
- You approve — the Main PM starts the work. A notification asks for your Approve & Start decision; approve, and the Main PM breaks it into per-cell subtasks.
- Each cell's PM delegates, supports, and triages its developers (UX/UI, Frontend, Backend).
- Developers build it, QA verifies and gates it, Documenters keep the books.
- Cell PMs merge their PRs into the Main PM's branch.
- The Main PM opens the final PR and notifies you "It's done!" — you approve and merge, or send it back for rework. (Only you ever merge to
master.)
— Full circle —
See the full walkthrough, with screenshots →
Or watch the full panel walkthrough (video) →
Project Structure
roboco/
├── roboco/ # Main Python package
│ ├── api/ # FastAPI routes & schemas
│ │ ├── routes/ # API endpoints (tasks, git, agents, etc.)
│ │ └── schemas/ # Pydantic request/response models
│ ├── services/ # Business logic services
│ │ ├── task.py # Task lifecycle management
│ │ ├── workspace.py # Multi-agent workspace management
│ │ ├── messaging.py # Agent communication
│ │ └── optimal.py # RAG/Knowledge base (in-house pgvector)
│ ├── models/ # Pydantic domain models
│ ├── db/ # SQLAlchemy ORM & session
│ ├── enforcement/ # Task lifecycle state machine
│ ├── runtime/ # Orchestrator for agent spawning
│ ├── agents/ # Agent base classes
│ ├── mcp/ # MCP server implementations
│ └── config.py # Application configuration
├── agents/
│ └── prompts/ # Agent system prompts (roles, teams, identities)
├── docs/
│ ├── how-to/ # Visual walkthrough — 5-chapter guide (start at README.md)
│ └── rag/ # Agent knowledge base (indexed into RAG)
├── alembic/ # Database migrations
├── CLAUDE.md # Claude Code guidance
├── docker-compose.yml # Full stack, built from source
└── docker-compose.registry.yml # Full stack, pulled from the image registry
Running RoboCo
You need Docker + Docker Compose and a Claude Code auth directory on the host (~/.claude, mounted into the orchestrator so agents can reach the model). Copy .env.example to .env and set at least ROBOCO_ENCRYPTION_KEY and ROBOCO_AGENT_AUTH_SECRET (that file shows how to generate each). However you start it, the whole company is reachable at one origin: http://localhost:3000.
Optional — run agents on xAI Grok instead of Claude. RoboCo can spawn agents on xAI's official grok CLI authenticated by a SuperGrok subscription (no metered API key). Run grok login once on the host and point ROBOCO_HOST_GROK_DIR at the resulting ~/.grok so it mounts into Grok agents; the orchestrator keeps the ~6h token refreshed for you. See the Grok block in .env.example (ROBOCO_HOST_GROK_DIR, ROBOCO_GROK_AGENT_IMAGE, ROBOCO_GROK_CLI_MODEL, ROBOCO_GROK_REASONING_EFFORT).
Option 1 — Run the pre-built images (quickest)
Every release publishes all RoboCo images to both the GitHub Container Registry and Docker Hub, so you can run the full stack without building anything. Use the registry compose:
git clone https://github.com/rennf93/roboco.git && cd roboco
cp .env.example .env # then edit in your secrets
docker compose -f docker-compose.registry.yml pull
docker compose -f docker-compose.registry.yml up -d
Choose the registry and version with two env vars (defaults shown):
ROBOCO_REGISTRY=ghcr.io/rennf93 # or docker.io/renzof93
ROBOCO_VERSION=latest # or a pinned release, e.g. 0.15.0
The orchestrator spawns the matching pre-built agent images on demand — no build toolchain or source compile on your host.
Option 2 — Build from source
The same full stack, built locally from the Dockerfiles instead of pulled:
git clone https://github.com/rennf93/roboco.git && cd roboco
cp .env.example .env # then edit in your secrets
docker compose up -d # builds images on first run, then starts everything
Option 3 — Local development (no full stack)
For hacking on the code itself, run only the backing services in Docker and the API on your host. RoboCo's own code requires Python 3.13+ (uv will fetch it if needed):
uv sync
docker compose up -d postgres redis ollama # backing services only
uv run alembic upgrade head # migrate the database
uv run python -m roboco.cli # API + orchestrator
# Or just the API without the orchestrator:
uv run uvicorn roboco.api.app:app --reload --host 0.0.0.0 --port 8000
Configuration
Key environment variables (see roboco/config.py for all options):
# API Server
ROBOCO_HOST=0.0.0.0
ROBOCO_PORT=8000
# Database
ROBOCO_DATABASE_HOST=localhost
ROBOCO_DATABASE_PORT=5432
ROBOCO_DATABASE_NAME=roboco
# Workspaces (Multi-Agent Git)
ROBOCO_WORKSPACES_ROOT=/data/workspaces
ROBOCO_WORKSPACE_AUTO_CLONE=true
# RAG/LLM
ROBOCO_LOCAL_LLM_BASE_URL=http://roboco-ollama:11434/v1
ROBOCO_LOCAL_LLM_MODEL=glm-5.2:cloud
# Feature flags (default-off unless noted; toggle from Settings → Feature Flags)
ROBOCO_CONVENTIONS_ENABLED=false # per-project architectural conventions standard
ROBOCO_TOOLCHAIN_MATCH_ENABLED=false # build each target project under its own Python
ROBOCO_OVERLOAD_BREAK_ENABLED=true # park a provider on a persistent model-API overload
Multi-Agent Workspace Structure
Each agent gets their own git clone for parallel development:
{ROBOCO_WORKSPACES_ROOT}/
└── {project-slug}/
└── {team}/
└── {agent-slug}/
└── [git repository]
Example:
/data/workspaces/roboco/backend/be-dev-1/
/data/workspaces/roboco/backend/be-dev-2/
Task Lifecycle
backlog → pending → claimed → in_progress → verifying → awaiting_qa
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
cancelled blocked needs_revision awaiting_documentation
paused ↓
awaiting_pm_review
↓
awaiting_ceo_approval
↓
completed
Assembled, PR-bearing tasks pass through one extra stage — the in-path PR-review gate — before the PM merges:
in_progress → awaiting_pr_review → awaiting_pm_review
(submit_up / (pr_pass)
submit_root) (pr_fail → needs_revision)
The cell PM's submit_up (cell→root PR) and the Main PM's submit_root (root→master PR) open the assembled PR and enter the gate; a PR reviewer pr_passes it on to the PM merge or pr_fails it back. Leaf dev tasks (reviewed by QA) and branchless coordination roots skip the gate.
API Endpoints
Domain routes are mounted under /api:
| Route Group | Description |
|---|---|
/api/tasks |
Task CRUD, lifecycle, claiming |
/api/agents |
Agent management |
/api/git |
Git operations (status, commit, push, PR) |
/api/sessions |
Communication sessions |
/api/messages |
Agent messages |
/api/projects |
Project (repo) management |
/api/work-sessions |
Git work session tracking |
/api/optimal |
RAG/Knowledge base queries |
/api/journals |
Agent journals/reflections |
/api/orchestrator/status |
Orchestrator / dispatcher status |
The agent gateway verbs are served separately under /api/v1/flow/{role}/{verb} (intent verbs) and /api/v1/do (content tools) — see the Agent Gateway.
Development
# Install dev dependencies
uv sync --all-extras
# Run tests
uv run pytest
# Format and lint
uv run ruff format .
uv run ruff check .
uv run mypy roboco/
# Type checking
uv run mypy roboco/
Core Principles
- Everything is a task - All work is tracked and documented
- No work without a task - Create task record first
- No task without acceptance criteria - How do we know it's done?
- No closure without documentation - Future agents need context
- Communication is constant - Stream reasoning, log everything
- The Auditor sees all - Quality monitored silently
- CEO approves major changes - Human-in-the-loop for critical decisions
Technology Stack
| Layer | Technology |
|---|---|
| API Framework | FastAPI |
| Database | PostgreSQL + SQLAlchemy (async) |
| Vector Store | PostgreSQL + pgvector (in-house engine) |
| Cache/Queue | Redis |
| RAG Engine | in-house (asyncpg + pgvector, hybrid retrieval) |
| Embeddings | qwen3-embedding:0.6b (Ollama) |
| Local LLM | Ollama (glm-5.2:cloud) |
| Cloud LLM | Claude API (Anthropic) + xAI Grok (official grok CLI, SuperGrok subscription) |
| Package Manager | uv |
Status
Core Infrastructure (Complete)
- Data models (Pydantic)
- Database ORM (SQLAlchemy async)
- Task lifecycle state machine
- Multi-agent workspace management
- Agent prompts (25 agents)
- Messaging API
- Task API with full lifecycle
- Git operations API
- RAG/Knowledge base (in-house pgvector engine)
- Agent orchestrator
- CEO approval workflow
- Pluggable agent providers (Claude Code + xAI Grok on the official
grokCLI) - Inbound PR review (read-only PR-reviewer + CEO supersede/dismiss queue)
- Self-healing CI loop for RoboCo's own repo (default-off, CEO-gated)
- Business Goals tab with a live Company Scorecard (delivery, spend-vs-budget, lead time)
In Progress
- Frontend panel (vendored under
panel/, served through nginx on :3000) - Full agent autonomy testing
Security
Important
Do not expose RoboCo to the public internet as-is. It is designed to run on a trusted private network (homelab / LAN).
Agent authentication. Requests identify the caller with X-Agent-Id / X-Agent-Role headers. The orchestrator issues each spawned agent an HMAC token (X-Agent-Token, signed with ROBOCO_AGENT_AUTH_SECRET) that binds its id, role and team. Token enforcement is gated by ROBOCO_AGENT_AUTH_REQUIRED:
ROBOCO_AGENT_AUTH_REQUIREDunset/false (default): header-trust mode — the role headers are accepted without a token, so any client that can reach the API may claim any role (includingceo). The API logs a warning at startup in this mode. Acceptable only on a trusted network.ROBOCO_AGENT_AUTH_REQUIRED=true: every request must carry a valid token; an agent cannot spoof another agent's role. The control panel keeps working because nginx — the only trusted hop between the browser and the API — injects the CEO token (X-Agent-Token) on/apiand/ws, so the browser never holds the signing secret. Generate that token withmake panel-tokenand set it asROBOCO_PANEL_AGENT_TOKENin.envbefore enabling secure mode.
WebSocket streams. Token enforcement is currently REST-only. The /ws/* endpoints authenticate by agent_id query param at most and do not yet validate X-Agent-Token, even in secure mode — nginx injects the token so the panel works, but a direct WebSocket connection that bypasses nginx is not rejected. In particular the operator stream /ws/system (rate-limit lifecycle + token-usage snapshots for the dashboard) is unauthenticated. These streams are read-only — no control surface, secrets, or task content — but treat the orchestrator port as trusted-network-only until WebSocket auth lands.
Secrets (the Fernet ROBOCO_ENCRYPTION_KEY, GitHub PATs) live encrypted in the database and in gitignored env files — never in the repo. Per-project git tokens are Fernet-encrypted at rest and never returned by the API.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Renzo Franceschini
RoboCo is licensed under the GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 (AGPL-3.0). See LICENSE for the full text.
The AGPL's network-use clause (section 13) means that if you run a modified version of RoboCo as a network service, you must make your modified source available to its users. This keeps the project open while preventing closed, hosted re-distributions.
Contributing
Contributions are welcome. All contributors must sign the Contributor License Agreement (CLA.md) — this is automated on your first pull request. See CONTRIBUTING.md for the workflow and why the CLA exists.