mirror of
https://github.com/rennf93/roboco.git
synced 2026-08-03 07:23:24 +02:00
Task #157 — spine-cap allows planning fanout across cells:
main-pm's pattern is to delegate planning to be-pm / fe-pm / ux-pm
in parallel — each on a different team. The previous spine-cap
rejected all planning siblings under one parent as
over-decomposition. New helper _is_cross_team_planning skips the
cap for planning when both teams are non-empty and distinct. Code
/ documentation stay capped regardless (single repo on one branch
shouldn't have two simultaneous code subtasks).
Task #159 — tracing-gap remediate hints every requirement:
journal:during_work>=1, journal:struggle, commits>=1, pr_open,
and self_verified had no entries in _hint_for_missing_key, so when
they were missing the agent saw the token in `missing[]` but the
`remediate` text had no instruction for how to satisfy them.
Smoke-10's be-dev-1 burned multiple turns retrying i_am_done not
knowing scope='reflect' doesn't count toward during_work. Now
every token has a hint, the during_work hint warns that reflect
doesn't satisfy it, and multi-hint remediate uses a numbered list
so the model treats each requirement as a distinct step instead
of a semicolon-blob.
Also coerce convert_plan._coerce_risk formatting (ruff-format follow-up
to 9cd73d0).
179 lines
6.3 KiB
Python
179 lines
6.3 KiB
Python
"""Task #159: tracing-gap remediate covers every missing requirement.
|
|
|
|
Pre-fix:
|
|
`journal:during_work>=1` (and a handful of other tokens) had no entry
|
|
in `_hint_for_missing_key`'s `simple_hints` dict. When the
|
|
requirement was missing, the agent saw the token in `missing[]` but
|
|
the `remediate` string contained NO instruction for how to satisfy
|
|
it. The agent fixed the items with hints, retried, hit the same
|
|
rejection again on the unhinted token, and looped.
|
|
|
|
Fix:
|
|
Register hints for the previously-unhinted tokens
|
|
(`journal:during_work>=1`, `journal:struggle`, `commits>=1`,
|
|
`pr_open`, `self_verified`). Multi-hint remediate switches to a
|
|
numbered list so the model sees each requirement as a distinct
|
|
instruction instead of a semicolon-blob.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
from unittest.mock import AsyncMock
|
|
from uuid import uuid4
|
|
|
|
import pytest
|
|
from roboco.services.gateway.choreographer import Choreographer, ChoreographerDeps
|
|
|
|
_MIN_HINT_LEN = 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _build_choreographer() -> Choreographer:
|
|
deps = ChoreographerDeps(
|
|
task=AsyncMock(),
|
|
work_session=AsyncMock(),
|
|
git=AsyncMock(),
|
|
a2a=AsyncMock(),
|
|
journal=AsyncMock(),
|
|
audit=AsyncMock(),
|
|
evidence_repo=AsyncMock(),
|
|
messaging=AsyncMock(),
|
|
)
|
|
repo = deps.evidence_repo
|
|
for method in (
|
|
"list_unread_a2a",
|
|
"list_unread_mentions",
|
|
"list_pending_notifications",
|
|
"task_metadata_gaps",
|
|
"recent_team_activity",
|
|
"blockers_in_lane",
|
|
"journal_highlights_for_task",
|
|
):
|
|
getattr(repo, method).return_value = []
|
|
return Choreographer(deps)
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
# Hint registration — every previously-unhinted token now has a hint
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
|
|
"token",
|
|
[
|
|
"journal:during_work>=1",
|
|
"journal:struggle",
|
|
"commits>=1",
|
|
"pr_open",
|
|
"self_verified",
|
|
],
|
|
)
|
|
def test_hint_registered_for_previously_unhinted_token(token: str) -> None:
|
|
"""Every requirement token must have a non-empty hint so the agent
|
|
knows how to satisfy it."""
|
|
hint = Choreographer._hint_for_missing_key(token, uuid4())
|
|
assert hint is not None, (
|
|
f"requirement token {token!r} has no hint; agent will see the "
|
|
f"token in `missing[]` but no actionable instruction"
|
|
)
|
|
assert len(hint) > _MIN_HINT_LEN, (
|
|
f"hint for {token!r} is suspiciously short: {hint!r}"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_during_work_hint_warns_reflect_doesnt_count() -> None:
|
|
"""The during_work hint must explicitly say reflect doesn't satisfy
|
|
it — that's the exact confusion smoke-10's be-dev-1 hit."""
|
|
hint = Choreographer._hint_for_missing_key("journal:during_work>=1", uuid4())
|
|
assert hint is not None
|
|
lower = hint.lower()
|
|
assert "reflect" in lower and (
|
|
"does not count" in lower
|
|
or "doesn't count" in lower
|
|
or "do not count" in lower
|
|
or "not count" in lower
|
|
), f"during_work hint must warn that scope='reflect' doesn't satisfy this: {hint!r}"
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
# Multi-hint remediate — numbered list, not semicolon-joined
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
|
async def test_single_missing_remediate_is_plain_string() -> None:
|
|
"""One missing item: remediate is the hint itself, no numbering."""
|
|
c = _build_choreographer()
|
|
env = await c._build_tracing_gap(uuid4(), uuid4(), ["journal:reflect"])
|
|
body = env.as_dict()
|
|
assert body["error"] == "tracing_gap"
|
|
assert body["missing"] == ["journal:reflect"]
|
|
assert "Multiple requirements missing" not in (body["remediate"] or "")
|
|
assert "1." not in (body["remediate"] or "")
|
|
|
|
|
|
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
|
async def test_multi_missing_remediate_is_numbered_list() -> None:
|
|
"""Multiple missing items: remediate must be a numbered list so the
|
|
agent treats each as a distinct step."""
|
|
c = _build_choreographer()
|
|
env = await c._build_tracing_gap(
|
|
uuid4(),
|
|
uuid4(),
|
|
["journal:reflect", "journal:during_work>=1", "commits>=1"],
|
|
)
|
|
body = env.as_dict()
|
|
remediate = body["remediate"] or ""
|
|
assert "Multiple requirements missing" in remediate, remediate
|
|
assert "1." in remediate
|
|
assert "2." in remediate
|
|
assert "3." in remediate
|
|
# All three hints must be substring-present (proves each was emitted).
|
|
assert "reflect" in remediate.lower()
|
|
assert "during" in remediate.lower() or "decision" in remediate.lower()
|
|
assert "commit" in remediate.lower()
|
|
|
|
|
|
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
|
async def test_unhinted_token_still_appears_in_remediate() -> None:
|
|
"""If a future requirement is added without a hint (defense), the
|
|
agent at least sees the literal token in the remediate — not silently
|
|
dropped."""
|
|
c = _build_choreographer()
|
|
env = await c._build_tracing_gap(
|
|
uuid4(),
|
|
uuid4(),
|
|
["unknown_future_requirement"],
|
|
)
|
|
body = env.as_dict()
|
|
remediate = body["remediate"] or ""
|
|
assert "unknown_future_requirement" in remediate, (
|
|
f"unhinted token must surface in remediate as fallback. Got: {remediate!r}"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
|
async def test_acceptance_criteria_grouped_into_one_hint() -> None:
|
|
"""Acceptance criteria entries collapse into a single hint regardless
|
|
of how many criteria are missing (so 5 unaddressed criteria don't
|
|
produce 5 separate numbered items)."""
|
|
c = _build_choreographer()
|
|
task_id = uuid4()
|
|
env = await c._build_tracing_gap(
|
|
uuid4(),
|
|
task_id,
|
|
[
|
|
"acceptance_criterion:Branch named correctly",
|
|
"acceptance_criterion:Commit prefix present",
|
|
"acceptance_criterion:PR opened",
|
|
],
|
|
)
|
|
body = env.as_dict()
|
|
remediate = body["remediate"] or ""
|
|
# All three criterion names should appear in the SAME hint section
|
|
# (collapsed into one hint, not three separate numbered items).
|
|
assert "Branch named correctly" in remediate
|
|
assert "Commit prefix present" in remediate
|
|
assert "PR opened" in remediate
|
|
# Single-hint case → no "Multiple requirements" preamble.
|
|
assert "Multiple requirements missing" not in remediate
|