Grok agents run on opencode, not Claude Code, so they do NOT have full
guardrail parity — claiming otherwise would be false. Document it truthfully
and keep them usable rather than blocking them.
- Panel routing card: an amber caveat shown in Grok/Mix mode — command/
secret-exfil guard + cost cap apply to Grok, but the prompt-injection guard
does NOT (opencode cannot block a turn); Anthropic/Ollama/Self-Hosted run
through Claude Code with the full guard set; prefer those for agents that
ingest untrusted or cross-agent content; Grok is safe for trusted work.
- docs/self/architecture/llm-provider-security.md: the reference — the two
runtimes, which provider uses which, the per-guardrail parity matrix, why
the injection/stop gaps exist (opencode hooks are observe-only), and the
routing recommendation (delivery roles handling untrusted content → a
Claude-Code-runtime provider).
Panel tsc + eslint clean.
