mirror of
https://github.com/rennf93/roboco.git
synced 2026-08-03 07:23:24 +02:00
4d4bf084c5ce97ed56479bb3f7113759c147da63
6
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Renn F
|
5bb13c8453 | [F031] identity: role_for_slug_or_none so defensive skip-guards don't crash the dispatcher tick on stale slugs | ||
|
|
5fe1e6df58 |
feat: in-path PR-review gate — per-cell + main reviewers (#229)
* feat(lifecycle): add the in-path PR-review gate status + reviewer verbs
Insert awaiting_pr_review between the assembled-PR submit and the PM merge,
giving the merge level the rejection capability it structurally lacks — today
only qa_fail and ceo_reject ever reach needs_revision, so a PM review is a
merge button with no teeth.
- New Status awaiting_pr_review + submit_for_review / pr_pass / pr_fail actions
(pr_pass -> awaiting_pm_review, pr_fail -> needs_revision, mirroring the QA gate).
- Reviewer verbs claim_gate_review / pr_pass / pr_fail, and a main-PM submit_root
verb (the root analogue of the cell PM's submit_up; opens the root->master PR).
- Extend the self-review-symmetry validator to the new sign-off actions.
- Mirror the value into the ORM TaskStatus enum + the A2A state map, and add the
postgres taskstatus enum value (migration 040, forward-only like 037).
- Regenerate the per-role verb tables; add gate spec tests.
Spec surface only; the gateway methods + dispatch are wired in follow-ups, so the
verbs are advertised but dormant (flow_server tolerates unregistered verbs).
* feat(identity): add the three cell PR-review-gate reviewers
The in-path gate needs a reviewer per cell so each cell's assembled cell->root
PR is reviewed by a stack-specialized agent, while pr-reviewer-1 serves the
root->master gate (and keeps doing inbound external PRs).
- be/fe/ux-pr-reviewer: PR_REVIEWER role, team-scoped (so dispatch routes each
cell's gate to its own reviewer); seeded identities + ROLE_TEAM_RULES + names.
AI agent count 22 -> 25.
- They reuse the existing roboco-agent-pr-reviewer image (AGENT_IMAGES maps the
three slugs to it, as be-dev-1/-2 share one image) — no new image.
- Tracing table: pr_pass/pr_fail require a learning entry (parity with
post_pr_review), submit_root mirrors submit_up, claim_gate_review is waived
(its tracing applies on pr_pass/pr_fail) — completes the verb surface added
in the prior commit.
- Update the roster-pinning identity tests.
* feat(gateway): wire the in-path PR-review gate end to end
Make the assembled-PR review gate operational across the choreographer, the
TaskService transitions, and the v1 flow surface.
- TaskService: submit_for_review (in_progress→awaiting_pr_review), pr_gate_claim
(no-transition reviewer claim), pr_pass (→awaiting_pm_review), pr_fail
(→needs_revision); mirror qa_pass/qa_fail (clear claim, actor-mismatch warn,
issues appended for the PM's revision). VerbRunner gains the matching atomic
handlers + a create_root_pr side effect.
- Repoint submit_up to compose submit_for_review (cell→root PR enters the gate),
and add a main-PM submit_root verb (opens the root→master PR, enters the gate).
- Split main_pm_complete: a code root must pass the gate first (requires
awaiting_pm_review; rejects an in_progress code root toward submit_root and no
longer reopens the PR), while a branchless coordination root still walks
straight through, ungated.
- PRGateMixin (claim_gate_review / pr_pass / pr_fail) composed onto the
Choreographer; flow_server forwarders + v1 routes (pr_reviewer + main_pm) +
request schemas.
- Tests: gate spec + the updated submit_up / main_pm_complete expectations + new
real-DB integration tests driving submit_for_review→pr_gate_claim→pr_pass and
pr_fail through the real enforcement layer.
* feat(orchestrator): dispatch the in-path PR-review gate
Make the gate live in the dispatch loop.
- _dispatch_pr_gate_work: route awaiting_pr_review tasks to reviewers by level —
a cell→root task to its cell reviewer (be/fe/ux-pr-reviewer), the root→master
task to pr-reviewer-1. The reviewer self-claims via claim_gate_review (no
pre-claim, mirroring the external-PR dispatcher); registered in
_dispatch_all_work. _select_agent_for_cell learns the pr_reviewer role.
- _build_pr_gate_prompt: anchors the reviewer to the parent objective + full
acceptance criteria + the FE<->BE contract, then pr_pass / pr_fail.
- _readiness_check_role_for_status: awaiting_pr_review -> pr_reviewer.
- Fail routing: pr_fail reassigns the failed assembled task to its PM
(_revision_pm_for_task: cell PM for a cell team, Main PM for the root), and the
revision dispatcher is generalized from coordination-roots-only to any
PM-owned needs_revision task so the gate-failed task is re-coordinated instead
of deadlocking.
* docs: document the in-path PR-review gate + the cell reviewers (22→25)
Reflect the shipped gate across the canonical + RAG docs.
- CLAUDE.md: agent count 22→25, the cell reviewers in the org chart, an
awaiting_pr_review state + the gate transitions + a gate note in the lifecycle
section, and submit_root / claim_gate_review / pr_pass / pr_fail in the verb
surface table.
- docs/rag/architecture: org-structure (count, cell-reviewer roster, cells
table), agent-uuids (be/fe/ux-pr-reviewer rows), agent-model (role + team
rows).
- docs/rag/roles/pr-reviewer: the in-path gate section + the gate verbs.
- Wrap reviewer.id with UUID(str(...)) in the gate DB tests for mypy.
* docs: finish the gate doc sweep across README + RAG + generated artifacts
Catch the remaining surfaces beyond the canonical docs.
- README + how-to: agent count 22→25, the 6-agent cells (+ PR Reviewer), the
main reviewer's root→master gate role.
- RAG: permissions + tool-permissions + task-tools list the gate verbs
(claim_gate_review / pr_pass / pr_fail) for pr_reviewer; regenerate the
lifecycle artifacts (intent-verbs, status-transitions, the per-role
lifecycle-*.md prompts, panel lifecycle.json) from the spec via
build_lifecycle_artifacts.py so they carry the new status + verbs.
* fix(migration): shorten the 040 revision id to fit alembic_version VARCHAR(32)
The revision id '040_taskstatus_awaiting_pr_review' is 33 chars; alembic's
alembic_version.version_num column is VARCHAR(32), so recording the migration on
a real 'alembic upgrade head' failed with 'value too long for type character
varying(32)' (surfaced on the NAS deploy). The test suite missed it: the test DB
is built via Base.metadata.create_all and the parity test only renders SQL
offline, so nothing actually applied the migration chain.
- Rename to '040_awaiting_pr_review' (22 chars).
- Add a guard test asserting every revision id fits the VARCHAR(32) column.
- Verified by applying the full chain 001->040 against real Postgres: it now
reaches head and records '040_awaiting_pr_review' without truncation.
* fix(migration): land the actual 040 revision-id shortening + guard test
The prior commit captured only the file rename (git add aborted on the deleted
old path), leaving the long revision id and missing the guard test. This commit
carries the real content: revision id '040_awaiting_pr_review' (22 chars) and the
revision-id length guard. Re-verified against real Postgres — the full chain
reaches head and records the short id without truncation.
* fix(product): flush cell deletes before inserts when re-mapping projects
Editing a product's cell->project map (PATCH /api/products/{id}) 409'd with
'duplicate key value violates unique constraint uq_product_projects_product_team'
whenever a team already had a mapping. _replace_cells clears the old rows and
appends the new ones, but within a single flush SQLAlchemy orders INSERTs before
DELETEs for the same table, so the new (product_id, team) rows collided with the
not-yet-deleted old ones. Flush the deletes first.
Pre-existing bug (unrelated to the PR-review gate); surfaced on the NAS. New
real-Postgres regression test re-maps all three cells to different projects —
it fails with the unique violation without the fix and passes with it. The
existing update test only changed WHICH team was mapped, so it never collided.
* fix(gateway): let main_pm submit_root past the shared submit-up guard
submit_root reused the cell PM's _submit_up_ownership_guard, which
hardcoded agent.role != cell_pm and rejected the Main PM with
"submit_up is reserved for cell_pm". A branch-bearing code root could
then never close: submit_root bounced to complete, while complete
required awaiting_pm_review (reachable only via submit_root) and bounced
back — a circular rejection.
Both callers already run the spec gate (can_invoke_intent), which
enforces submit_up→cell_pm and submit_root→main_pm, so the guard's role
re-check was redundant for submit_up and wrong for submit_root. Broaden
it to accept either PM role as a defense-in-depth non-PM reject.
Adds the first choreographer-level submit_root test (the gap that let
this ship).
* fix(gateway): proactively steer both PMs to their bubble-up verb
The submit_root deadlock had a sibling steering gap: nothing told a PM
which verb opens the gate. The delegate next-hint said only 'i_am_idle
when done', and complete's in_progress rejection named submit_root for
the Main PM but left the Cell PM with a bare 'not ready for completion'
— no submit_up pointer, the same guess-the-verb trap.
- delegate hint now names the role-correct verb (root → submit_root,
cell parent → submit_up) proactively, before any rejection.
- cell_pm_complete's in_progress rejection now steers to submit_up,
mirroring the Main PM's submit_root gate hint.
Tests cover both the cell-PM steer and the role-aware delegate hint.
* docs: correct who-merges-which-PR across the gate docs + complete description
Audit of the gate docs found the merge actors mis-stated in several
places — the exact ambiguity that risks 'the reviewer/PM merges the root
PR' confusion:
- complete IntentSpec description said 'Main PM merges root PR' — false;
main_pm_complete escalates and the CEO merges root→master. Corrected
(propagated to intent-verbs.md, lifecycle.json, generated role prompts
via build_lifecycle_artifacts.py).
- task-tools.md: submit_up target was awaiting_pm_review (should be
awaiting_pr_review); Main PM flow had no submit_root — added it.
- README.md: lifecycle diagram now shows the awaiting_pr_review gate.
- cell-pm.md / main-pm.md: dropped the stale 'submit_up hands work to the
Main PM who merges your cell branch' model — the cell PM merges its own
gated cell→root PR; the Main PM owns the root + submit_root; the CEO
merges master. Added submit_root to the main-pm manifest.
- git-commits.md, pr-creation.md, tool-permissions.md, git-tools.md:
stopped attributing root→master PR opening to complete (it's submit_root).
No behavior change; verb wiring + state machine verified gap-free this
session (the pr_fail→needs_revision→PM respawn loop closes correctly).
* fix(orchestrator): stop closure respawn waiting the reaper window
A PM that finished its subtasks and idled left its parent 'paused' with a
fresh last_heartbeat_at. _is_recently_paused gated closure respawn on
_claim_heartbeat_ttl — the REAPER window (stale_claim_reap_seconds: 600s
default, 1800s on the NAS) — so the parent sat untouched for up to 10-30
minutes before its PM was respawned to close it. The whole chain stalled
behind it.
The race that guard actually protects against (i_am_idle auto-pauses, then
the agent is marked IDLE + its container tears down) is seconds, and the
live-session case is already covered by _is_agent_active. Introduce a
dedicated short debounce (pm_closure_recently_paused_seconds, default 45s)
and gate closure on that instead.
The existing test fixture masked this by setting _claim_heartbeat_ttl to
claim_stale_seconds (180s), not the production reaper value. Fixture now
mirrors production; adds a regression test that a parent paused past the
debounce but within the reaper window respawns immediately.
* feat(gate): post the in-path review verdict on the assembled PR
The in-path gate previously left no trace on the PR it gated — pr_pass /
pr_fail were pure status transitions. Now each verdict is posted as a
GitHub review on the assembled PR itself (server-side, bot account), so
the decision is visible on the very PR the PM merges.
- pr_pass → APPROVE, pr_fail → REQUEST_CHANGES on a cell→root PR.
- The root→master PR ALWAYS gets a plain COMMENT, never APPROVE/REQUEST_
CHANGES: only the CEO acts on master, so the gate must never leave an
approval that could satisfy branch protection (letting someone else
merge) nor a blocking review that could impede the CEO's merge.
- Best-effort and AFTER the DB transition — a GitHub failure is logged,
never rolls back the gate decision. Reuses git.post_pr_review's existing
self-review→COMMENT downgrade for the org's own PRs.
Adds _project_slug_for to the ChoreographerHelpers protocol (mypy) and a
unit suite covering event selection, the master-bound COMMENT rule, the
no-PR skip, and failure-swallowing. Docs updated (pr-reviewer, task-tools).
---------
Co-authored-by: Renn F <rennf93@users.noreply.github.com>
|
||
|
Renn F
|
5902c0fe38 |
feat(roles): add the read-only pr_reviewer role end-to-end
A global, read-only PR reviewer agent (pr-reviewer-1) that reviews inbound external/fork PRs and posts one change-request. Wired end-to-end: - identity: Role.PR_REVIEWER + agent + ROLE_LEVEL (QA-peer) + REVIEWER_ROLES - lifecycle: CLAIM_RULES + ROLE_TEAM_RULES + a dedicated claim_pr_review / post_pr_review verb pair (distinct from QA's) + the pr_review_done action and its in_progress->completed transition; give_me_work / i_am_idle gain the role - role_config: a read-only RoleConfig (allows_write=False) - journaling: ALL_CELLS read tier so it can read internal intent like QA - tracing: post_pr_review requires a learning entry; claim_pr_review is waived - seeds presentation + factory prompt layer + builtin tools + the agentrole enum migration (037) + regenerated verb/lifecycle artifacts Read-only at /app like QA/auditor; default-off — nothing dispatches review work until external_pr_enabled. Foundation + role-config + enum suites green; ruff + mypy clean; orchestrator boots. |
||
|
|
46d89b58fe |
feat: company-in-a-box — goal-aware company layer (0.4.0) (#171)
* feat(goals): company charter singleton — data layer (Business Goals slice 1)
First slice of the company-in-a-box "Business Goals" phase: a single CEO-owned
charter row (north star + objectives + constraints + operating policy) that
will be injected into every agent's context_briefing so all work is goal-aware.
- CompanyGoalsTable: singleton table (all-zeros id), JSON objectives /
constraints / operating_policy, updated_at / updated_by.
- migration 032: create + seed the singleton row (offline-renderable; column
server-defaults fill an INSERT of just the id).
- CompanyGoalsService: get() (empty defaults when unset) + upsert() (singleton,
partial update, caller commits).
- tests: empty defaults, roundtrip, singleton + partial-update preservation.
Next slices (mapped, not yet built): briefing injection (BriefingInputs +
build_context_briefing + EvidenceRepo), API route (GET any / PUT CEO-only),
panel /goals page, and base/Board/PM prompt mentions.
* feat(goals): inject the company charter into every agent briefing (slice 2)
The charter is now goal-aware context for every agent:
- BriefingInputs gains company_goals; build_context_briefing surfaces it.
- EvidenceRepo.company_goals(): single-row lookup returning a COMPACT charter
(north star + objectives + constraints + operating policy; audit columns
dropped, lists capped) or None when unset, so an empty charter never bloats
the per-verb briefing.
- _briefing_for wires it into every context_briefing.
Tests: briefing surfaces company_goals (defaults None); repo returns None for an
absent/empty charter and the compact dict when set.
* feat(goals): company charter API — GET any agent, PUT CEO-only (slice 3)
- routes/company_goals.py: GET returns the charter (any authenticated agent —
it drives every briefing); PUT is CEO-only (403 otherwise), partial update via
model_dump(exclude_unset=True), explicit commit.
- schemas/company_goals.py: response + partial-update models.
- registered at /api/company-goals.
- tests: GET open to any role, CEO update persists + is readable, non-CEO 403.
* feat(goals): make the company charter actionable in agent prompts (slice 5)
Agents already receive company_goals in the briefing (slice 2); now tell them to
act on it:
- base.md: universal "Align with the company charter" section — favour work and
trade-offs that advance the objectives, honour the constraints, flag conflicts;
never a license to leave your role.
- board / main_pm / cell_pm: role-specific lines tying triage / cell-routing /
subtask decomposition to the charter.
Prompts are composed at spawn from base.md + roles/*.md directly (compose_prompt),
so no _generated regeneration is needed.
* feat(goals): company charter panel page (slice 4)
CEO-facing editor for the charter at /company-goals:
- lib/api/company-goals.ts: get / update (PUT) client.
- company-goals-card.tsx: edit north star + constraints (one per line) +
objectives / operating_policy (JSON, parsed + validated with toast errors);
display derives from server state (no set-state-in-effect).
- (dashboard)/company-goals/page.tsx + a "Company Goals" sidebar nav link.
tsc --noEmit + eslint clean. Completes Phase 1 (Business Goals): data, briefing
injection, API, prompts, panel.
* fix(test): make test_app route assertions robust to FastAPI 0.137 _IncludedRouter
FastAPI 0.137 stopped flattening include_router into app.routes — each include is
now an _IncludedRouter (a BaseRoute with no .path), so `{r.path for r in
app.routes}` raised AttributeError and the two router-registration tests failed
(the bump arrived via the claude-agent-sdk update in uv.lock). Add
_registered_paths(): OpenAPI schema paths (the stable public contract) plus each
included router's prefix, which also covers the websocket /ws mount (never in the
schema). Drops the now-incorrect type: ignore[attr-defined].
* feat(research): pluggable web search/fetch for Board + PM agents
Add a provider-agnostic web-research capability so the Board and PMs can
ground decisions in current external evidence the knowledge base can't
answer.
- ResearchService selects a provider adapter from config: Tavily, Brave,
and Exa adapters plus a NullProvider that degrades gracefully when no
key is set. Result count and fetched-content size are clamped to caps.
- /api/research/search and /api/research/fetch: role-gated to Board + PMs
(and the CEO), with a per-agent/day Redis quota that fails open.
- roboco-search MCP server (web_search / web_fetch) calls those routes;
the provider key stays server-side and agent containers never egress.
Mounted per role by the orchestrator, behind a master switch.
- Charter-aware prompt guidance for Board, Main PM, and Cell PM.
Additive: with no key configured it is a no-op and the existing delivery
lifecycle is unchanged.
* feat(pitch): Board pitch -> CEO approve -> auto-provision repos
Add an additive origination path so a product can be proposed, approved,
and stood up without manual repo/Project setup.
- Pitch entity + migration (pitches table); PitchService create/list/
reject/approve.
- GitHubProvisioningService: the one place that creates repos (POST
/orgs/{org}/repos). Server-side token/org; when unconfigured the whole
approve path is inert and nothing is created.
- On approval: provision one repo per target cell, register a Project per
repo, create a Product when multi-cell, and seed one Main-PM delivery
task — all reusing the existing Product / coordination-task machinery.
- /api/pitches: Board authors (PO/HoM), CEO approves/rejects, Board+PM+CEO
view. Errors mapped via a single translator.
Additive: the delivery lifecycle is untouched; with no provisioning token
the capability is a no-op. Agent-facing pitch tool + panel are follow-ups.
* feat(strategy): dormant autonomous strategy engine (engine 2)
Add a second, optional engine that watches the company against its
standing goals and surfaces what needs the CEO — without touching the
delivery lifecycle (engine 1).
- StrategyEngine.assess() reports observations: the company is idle while
goals stand, and tasks stranded in 'blocked' past a threshold.
- run_cycle() notifies the CEO (notify-only; it never spends, builds, or
auto-approves — originating work stays a CEO decision).
- Orchestrator runs it on its own interval, started/stopped with the other
background loops; the loop returns immediately unless enabled.
DORMANT by default (strategy_engine_enabled=False): the loop never runs and
a standard deployment is unchanged. Auto-origination is a further opt-in.
* docs(changelog): record Business Goals, Web Research, Pitch->Provision, and the dormant strategy engine under Unreleased
* feat(secretary): wire the Secretary role end-to-end (foundation)
Add SECRETARY as a distinct role — the CEO's conversational chief-of-staff,
governed separately from the Prompter (which stays read-only/human-only).
This is the role foundation only; authority, the live agent, and the panel
land in following commits.
- foundation/identity: Role.SECRETARY (board level), seeded secretary-1 agent,
role-level mapping.
- journaling read tier (ALL — it advises the CEO), role_config entry,
per-role model (opus), prompt-layer mapping + roles/secretary.md.
- i_am_idle gains SECRETARY so the role has a verb surface.
- migration 034: add 'secretary' to the agentrole enum (mirrors 025).
- Role-registry tests updated for the new role.
Inert by itself (nothing spawns it yet); additive — existing roles unchanged.
* feat(secretary): directives + gate-list authority (backend)
The Secretary acts only under CEO command. Low-risk directives (relay a
dictated message) execute immediately; high-impact ones — charter edits,
task start/cancel/override, pitch approval, announcements — are recorded
pending and run only after the CEO confirms (the gate list).
- secretary_directives table (migration 035) as the command audit + queue.
- SecretaryService: read company state; submit (direct->run, gated->queue +
notify CEO); confirm/reject; execution runs with the CEO as actor through
the existing services (the Secretary never holds CEO authority itself).
- /api/secretary: submit + state/task reads (Secretary or CEO); list/confirm/
reject (CEO only). Writes commit explicitly.
* feat(secretary): live conversational agent (container + bridge)
Stand up the Secretary as a persistent Claude-SDK container the CEO chats
with, mirroring the Intake agent and reusing its driver/session machinery.
- secretary_driver: build_secretary_options exposes read_company_state /
read_task / submit_directive as SDK tools that call /api/secretary/* with
the agent's HMAC token; backend-call logic is module-level + tested.
- secretary_main: container entrypoint (receiver + relay) reusing IntakeDriver.
- orchestrator: start/spawn/reap secretary session + run-cmd builder; no
workspace clone (reads state via API), mints a role=secretary token.
- secretary_live routes: panel <-> container bridge over the live registry.
- agent-secretary image (Dockerfile + compose build service).
Inert until a session is started; additive — intake and all agents unchanged.
* feat(secretary): panel chat + directive confirmation queue
The CEO's Secretary surface: a live chat (SSE) to talk to the Secretary, and
a 'Needs your confirmation' queue listing gated directives the Secretary
proposed — each with Confirm / Reject. Adds the sidebar nav entry.
- lib/api/secretary.ts: live (start/stream/status/send/stop) + directive
(list/confirm/reject) + state clients (all as the CEO).
- hooks/use-secretary.ts: drives one chat, accumulating SSE token deltas.
- secretary page: chat pane + pending-directive cards.
Completes the Secretary end-to-end (role + authority + live agent + panel).
* feat(pitch): agent-facing pitch tool + pitches panel
Complete the pitch path: the Board can now author pitches through the gateway,
and the CEO reviews/approves them in the panel.
- content_actions.pitch (Board-only) -> PitchService.create, returning an
Envelope; wired as a do-tool (do_server + /api/v1/do/pitch + schema) and
added to the Board's do-tools.
- Panel /pitches page: lists pitches with CEO Approve & provision / Reject;
sidebar nav entry.
Pitch (Phase 4) is now end-to-end: author -> CEO approve -> auto-provision.
* feat(cockpit): read-only 'is the business winning?' summary
A pure aggregation for the CEO over existing data — no new state, no writes.
- CockpitService.summary(): charter north-star/objectives, delivery counts
(in-flight/blocked/awaiting-CEO), 30-day spend vs the charter's budget cap,
pending pitches, and the strategy engine's signals (what needs you). Stamped
basis='proxy' — performance is a proxy until real launches.
- GET /api/cockpit/summary (CEO / Board / Main PM / Secretary).
- Panel /cockpit page + sidebar nav.
Reuses goals + usage + StrategyEngine.assess(); reads only.
* docs(changelog): add the Secretary and Cockpit to Unreleased
* fix(test): isolate the company-goals empty-defaults test from committed state
The shared test DB persists committed writes across tests; a route test
commits a charter, so the unit test's 'unset' assertion must establish its
own clean precondition rather than assume global emptiness.
* fix(gateway): lower evidence_repo complexity to rank A (xenon gate)
company_goals()'s 4-way `or` emptiness check tipped the module average to
rank B; `any(...)` is equivalent and keeps the module under the gate's A bar.
* chore(compose): mirror agent-secretary-image build into docker-compose.yaml
Both compose files are byte-identical and tracked; .yaml carries the same
agent-secretary-image build service already present in docker-compose.yml.
* chore(lifecycle): regenerate artifacts for secretary i_am_idle
The secretary role gained i_am_idle in the lifecycle spec; regenerate the
generated prompt/doc/json artifacts so foundation-check stays green.
* docs(changelog): cut the company-in-a-box phases to 0.4.0
Label the six additive phases (business goals, web research, pitch-provision,
strategy engine, secretary, cockpit) as 0.4.0; tag v0.4.0 is held until the
branch merges to master so it points at the release commit.
---------
Co-authored-by: Renn F <rennf93@users.noreply.github.com>
|
||
|
|
9f8834155a |
Feature: prompter gold upgrade (#84)
* feat(prompter): make the assistant a RoboCo insider and fully wire launch
The Prompter's intelligence lived in two thin static prompts, so it asked
generic checklist questions and produced a flat task. The launch path was
also only half-wired: the panel called the generic task-create endpoint with
no project, bypassing the Prompter's own confirm flow.
Interview brain
- Rewrite the chat system prompt with RoboCo's org model, the task-spec
standard, a dimensions playbook, and a reflect-back, 1-2-questions-per-turn,
auto-stop discipline.
- Inject the live projects/products list each turn so the assistant grounds
questions in real surfaces and resolves the target itself.
- Replace the brittle phrase-match readiness with a parsed roboco-meta control
block (parse_readiness); the block is stripped from the visible reply and the
turn now returns draft_ready + scale.
Structured GOLD draft
- Add first-class draft fields (objective, what_this_builds, the_work, notes)
carried in the existing draft_data JSONB — no migration.
- Compose the GOLD markdown description deterministically from those fields
(compose_description); the model never hand-formats the body.
Adaptive routing + wired launch
- Confirm now runs through the Prompter confirm endpoint with the human's
project/product choice and edited structured draft.
- Single-cell targets a project and the cell team; a multi-cell feature targets
a product and becomes a Main-PM coordination root that fans out.
Frontend
- Turn-envelope draft_ready (drop the duplicated phrase-match), structured
draft card, confirm dialog with a project/product picker and a per-cell
The Work editor, and the corrected priority labels (0 highest .. 3 lowest).
* fix(prompter): commit session writes so they survive across requests
Session create returned 201 but the row was never durably committed, so the
immediately-following /messages call could not find it and 404'd. The prompter
routes were the only write surface that never called db.commit() — every other
write route (tasks, a2a, groups, docs, product) commits explicitly rather than
rely on the request-teardown auto-commit, which is sensitive to middleware and
teardown ordering under the production server.
- Commit explicitly in all four prompter write routes (create session, send
message, get/generate draft, confirm).
- Fix _get_session's NotFoundError: it passed a full sentence as resource_type,
producing the doubled "... not found not found" message; now uses the
(resource_type, resource_id) signature.
- Panel: when a message hits a session the server no longer has, start a fresh
session and retry once instead of dead-ending on a stale id.
Add a regression test that gives each request its own non-committing session —
the real cross-request boundary the shared-session integration tests never
crossed. It reproduces the production 404 without the route commit and passes
with it.
* refactor(prompter): drop the "GOLD" jargon for plain wording
"GOLD" was informal shorthand for "a good/well-formed spec" that should never
have been baked into the LLM prompts, comments, and docstrings as if it were a
defined term. Replace it everywhere with plain language ("a well-formed task",
"a complete task spec", "the markdown description", "structured spec fields").
No behaviour change.
* feat(intake): add the intake interviewer agent role (static definition)
Phase 1 of the intake-agent feature: a new first-class `prompter` role — the
intake interviewer the CEO chats with to draft a task. This commit defines the
role across every foundation layer (no runtime yet); spawning + the live
session come next.
- identity: Role.PROMPTER, RoleLevel.INTAKE (lowest authority), an AGENTS row
(intake-1) on the board team, ROLE_LEVEL entry. Deliberately NOT in
BOARD_ROLES — it interviews, it does not review.
- lifecycle: gets i_am_idle like every agent (its only verb); no
delivery-lifecycle intents.
- journaling: ReadTier.OWN — isolated, reads only its own journal.
- role_config: human-only manifest — note + evidence only, no say/dm/notify/
channels; allows_subagent=True (research), allows_write=False.
- agents_config derives it automatically and correctly excludes it from
TASK_CREATOR_ROLES (it drafts, it never creates tasks).
- seed presentation ("Intake"); regenerated lifecycle artifacts.
- role system prompt: read the code first, single-CEO awareness, propose
rather than interrogate — written against the failures we saw.
- docs: roster count 19 -> 20, org charts, verb-surface table, usage roster.
All foundation drift checks pass; role/manifest/permission tests green.
* feat(intake): migrate agentrole enum to add 'prompter'
ALTER TYPE agentrole ADD VALUE IF NOT EXISTS 'prompter' so the intake agent
row seeds/spawns against a migrated production DB. Forward-only (postgres
can't drop enum values), guarded for offline mode — matches migration 012.
* style(intake): ruff format the role additions
* fix(intake): unguard the agentrole migration so it renders offline
The enum-migration-parity test renders 'alembic upgrade head --sql' (offline)
and greps for ALTER TYPE ... ADD VALUE. The is_offline_mode() guard skipped
emitting it, so the parity check couldn't see 'prompter'. Drop the guard —
PG16 permits ADD VALUE in a transaction, same as migration 020's backfill.
* feat(intake): the live-session driver (Claude Agent SDK loop)
Phase 2 begins. The intake agent isn't a one-shot `claude -p`; it's a live
Claude Code session the human chats with. This driver is the container's loop:
open one long-lived claude-agent-sdk ClaudeSDKClient, then per human message
run a turn (query + receive_response) and stream its events out, keeping
conversation context in-process — verified against the real SDK (v0.2.94).
- StreamChunk + normalize(): map SDK messages (StreamEvent text deltas,
AssistantMessage text/thinking/tool_use blocks, ResultMessage→session_id) to
panel-facing chunks. Duck-typed, so it works on real SDK objects and on test
fakes alike — SDK-free, fully unit-tested.
- IntakeDriver.run(): the loop, with injected session/source/sink seams; a turn
failure surfaces as an error chunk without killing the session.
- SdkIntakeSession + build_intake_options: the only SDK-coupled code (lazy
import; needs the live claude binary, so excluded from coverage).
- Add claude-agent-sdk dependency + mypy ignore-missing-stubs.
Relay, panel SSE, and the persistent on-demand spawn are the next steps.
* Updated uv.lock
* feat(intake): the panel<->agent live bridge (registry, routes, entrypoint, image)
Wires the live intake chat end to end (Phase 2 integration layer):
- prompter_live.py: the orchestrator-side per-session registry — open/close,
push (agent->panel), stream (SSE drain), deliver (panel->container). In-process
(the orchestrator is single-process). 7 unit tests.
- routes/prompter_live.py: GET /live/{id}/stream (SSE), POST /live/{id}/messages
(deliver), POST /live/{id}/events (relay in); registered under /api/prompter.
5 integration tests.
- agent_sdk/intake_main.py: the container entrypoint — a POST /turn receiver
(the driver's MessageSource) + a relay-poster EventSink + the ClaudeSDKClient
session, run concurrently. 4 unit tests on the wiring helpers.
- docker/agent-prompter.Dockerfile: FROM base, ENTRYPOINT = the driver (not the
one-shot `claude` the other agents use).
Remaining for Phase 2: the orchestrator persistent-spawn path (scope->workspace
clone, CMD = driver, registry.open on spawn, reap-on-confirm) — the deploy-side
piece, best finalized against a buildable image.
* feat(intake): orchestrator persistent spawn + start/stop for the live chat
Add the task-free spawn path for the intake (prompter) agent: one fixed
intake-1 container running the Agent-SDK driver (image ENTRYPOINT, not
claude -p), one live session at a time.
- spawn_intake_session clones the scope's repo(s) via WorkspaceService
(project -> one; product -> each distinct project, primary first),
composes the intake-1 prompt, resolves the model, and builds docker run
via _build_intake_run_cmd: no settings/hook mount (driver owns 9000),
no MCP config, no -w; registers the live relay and best-effort delivers
the opening message once the receiver is up.
- reap_intake_session closes the relay and stops the container.
- Routes: POST /live/start (project XOR product) and POST /live/{id}/stop.
- ROLE_MODEL_MAP[prompter]=opus; intake-1 -> roboco-agent-prompter image map.
- Replace the budget-sweep try/except/continue with _fetch_budget_status,
which logs the swallow at debug instead of silently dropping it.
25 new tests; docker + the clone are mocked. End-to-end container spawn is
pending a built image and the stack.
* feat(intake): wire /prompter to the live agent — scope form + SSE chat
Replace the Ollama chat loop on /prompter with the spawned-agent flow.
- IntakeForm: pick scope (project XOR product) + opening message + Start
before the chat; the agent clones that scope and reads the real code.
- use-prompter rewritten as the live brain (lib/api/prompter-live.ts): Start
spawns via POST /live/start, then an EventSource on /live/{id}/stream
streams the agent working — token deltas fill the assistant bubble,
tool_use/thinking drive a live activity line, a draft event renders the
existing DraftProposalCard. Messages go via POST /live/{id}/messages.
- Chat UX unchanged (Keep Chatting / Review & Confirm / ConfirmDialog reused);
reap-on-confirm and reap-on-leave call POST /live/{id}/stop.
- Drop the dead Ollama prompterApi client; trim prompter.ts to shared types.
Frontend gate green (tsc --noEmit, lint, build). The draft event + the
/live/{id}/confirm endpoint are the Phase 4 backend seam.
* feat(intake): confirm draft -> backlog task + agent draft emission
Complete the live intake vertical: the agent proposes a structured draft and
Review & Confirm turns it into a task.
- Draft emission: the prompter prompt instructs the agent to emit a fenced
roboco-draft JSON block when the spec is ready; the driver parses it into a
'draft' event over the existing relay -> the panel's DraftProposalCard. The
panel strips the raw block from the chat bubble.
- Fix a double-text bug: with include_partial_messages the reply arrives as
both StreamEvent deltas and the final AssistantMessage; the driver now takes
text from deltas only and the AssistantMessage for thinking/tool_use/draft.
- POST /live/{id}/confirm -> confirm_live_draft, reusing a draft->task core
extracted from confirm_draft; reaps the session on success.
- Both prompter confirm paths create at BACKLOG, not pending: backlog is the
holding area a draft waits in until it's reviewed and promoted to pending
(TaskService.activate). The legacy Ollama confirm was creating at pending,
skipping that gate — fixed.
- Remove the dead 'context' bootstrap param from the Ollama session-create
chain (schema + route + method + tests), superseded by the live scope form.
- No suppressions: replace every type:ignore/noqa across the intake surface
with a real fix (ORM .id -> UUID(str(x)); fakes -> monkeypatch.setattr;
lazy imports -> pyproject per-file ignore; union-attr -> recipients[0]).
Full make quality green; frontend tsc + lint green.
* build(intake): add the agent-prompter image builder to compose
The orchestrator references roboco-agent-prompter (AGENT_IMAGES + the
_ensure_agent_image dockerfile map) and docker/agent-prompter.Dockerfile
exists, but docker-compose.yml built every other agent image up front and
left this one out — so the image wasn't pre-built for a stack bring-up.
Mirror the other specialized agent-*-image builders: build from
docker/agent-prompter.Dockerfile, tag roboco-agent-prompter, depend on
agent-base-image.
* Created docker-compose.yaml for the NAS
* fix(intake): non-blocking /live/start so spawn never times out
The start POST awaited the whole spawn — workspace clone + first-time image
build + docker run — which blew past the panel's 60s HTTP timeout ('Request
timed out. The server may be busy.') and triggered a duplicate send. Found on
the 2026-06-09 NAS smoke.
- start_intake_session opens the live relay synchronously, then spawns the
container in the background (_spawn_intake_container_guarded). The route
returns the session id immediately; the panel opens the SSE stream right away.
- A background spawn failure is pushed onto the relay as an 'error' event and
closes the session, so the panel shows it instead of hanging.
- spawn_intake_session stays as the synchronous variant for direct callers/tests.
- Panel shows a 'Preparing the agent…' indicator until the first event arrives.
18 intake-spawn tests green; tsc + lint green. E2E re-validates on next smoke.
* fix(intake): propose_draft MCP tool + lock the agent down
Smoke 2026-06-09 exposed two compounding problems: the agent never reliably
emitted the draft (it narrated the spec instead of typing the magic fence), and
it had inherited the CEO's entire Claude Code env — Write/Edit/Bash + Gmail/
Notion/Calendar/Drive MCP — because bypassPermissions ignored the allowlist and
the mounted ~/.claude leaked the host MCP config.
- propose_draft: build_intake_options now registers an in-process SDK MCP tool
(create_sdk_mcp_server + @tool). The agent calls it to submit the draft; the
driver turns that ToolUseBlock into a 'draft' event (_is_propose_draft /
_draft_from_tool_input, tolerant of nested/flat/JSON-string input). The fenced
roboco-draft block stays as a fallback.
- Lockdown: strict_mcp_config=True + setting_sources=[] (ignore host MCP +
settings); permission_mode 'dontAsk' + a can_use_tool gate enforcing a hard
allowlist (Read/Grep/Glob/Task + propose_draft) replaces bypassPermissions.
- Prompt: call propose_draft (not a fence); the draft's downstream chain is
backlog -> Board (PO + HoM) -> CEO approve -> Main PM, and the agent's job ends
at the draft (it never routes or hands off).
SDK API verified against the installed claude-agent-sdk. Driver detection unit-
tested; the SDK-construction is validated on the next NAS smoke (incl. that
setting_sources=[] doesn't break the mounted-~/.claude auth).
* fix(intake): panel UX cluster from the smoke (#3/#4/#6/#12)
- #3 message boundaries: a tool call now ends the current text bubble, so the
agent's words before and after a tool render as separate messages instead of
one merged wall (the 'two waves merged into one bubble' the CEO saw).
- #4 activity indicator: promoted from tiny grey text to a prominent primary-
tinted pill so 'watch it work' is actually visible.
- #12 End chat: a header button (any chat state) reaps the agent and resets to
the form, reusing startAnother (which already stops the session). Backend
POST /live/{id}/stop already existed.
- #6 log noise: the opening-message delivery retry logs at debug, not error —
those failures are expected until the container receiver is up.
- Also fix a latent test gap from the #1 commit: the live-route test's fake
orchestrator now exposes start_intake_session (the route's non-blocking entry).
Frontend tsc + lint green; live-route + prompter_live tests green.
* fix(intake): render markdown in the chat bubbles (#8)
The agent emits rich markdown (### headers, **bold**, tables, lists) but the
bubble rendered raw text, so it was illegible (CEO-flagged on the smoke). Render
assistant content with react-markdown + remark-gfm (GFM tables) in a prose
container. Adds react-markdown + remark-gfm to the panel.
* feat(intake): #14 — two start routes (Board review vs straight to Main PM)
Per the CEO spec, the draft confirm now starts the task at PENDING with an
explicit assignment instead of parking it at backlog:
- route="board" (Board review & Start): assigned to the Product Owner, so the
orchestrator dispatches the full Board review (PO + Head of Marketing) before
the Main PM picks it up.
- route="main_pm" (Approve & Start): assigned straight to the Main PM, who
delegates to the cells (Board review skipped).
create_task_from_draft gains status + assigned_to params (default BACKLOG, so the
legacy confirm_draft is unchanged); confirm_live_draft + the /live/{id}/confirm
request carry the route. Service tests cover both routes.
* feat(intake): #14 draft-card buttons — Board review vs Approve & Start
Three buttons on the draft card now (CEO spec): Keep chatting / Board review &
Start / Approve & Start. The two action buttons confirm directly with their
route — launchTask(route) sends route to POST /live/{id}/confirm, which starts
the task at pending assigned to the Board (PO+HoM) or straight to the Main PM.
Supersedes the ConfirmDialog review step (scope is chosen up front in the form),
so it's removed from the page flow. The ConfirmDialog component + its sub-editors
are now unused — flagged for a follow-up cleanup, left in place to avoid churn.
tsc + lint green.
* fix(intake): keep the live SSE stream bound to its relay session
The orchestrator opened the relay session twice per live chat — once on the
request path (before the start call returns) and again inside the background
container spawn. The SSE stream binds to the session's queue the moment the
panel connects, so the second open swapped in a fresh queue and stranded the
stream: the agent replied normally, but its events went to the new queue while
the panel kept reading the old one, so the chat looked frozen on "Preparing…".
The second open was always redundant (the relay is opened by the caller before
the spawn). Remove it, and make open() idempotent so a live session is never
replaced out from under a stream that is already connected to it.
* fix(intake): draft-card launch buttons silently did nothing
The launch path required a `description` field, but the prompter draft schema
intentionally has none — it sends `objective` + the structured spec and the
backend composes the description (compose_description). `editableDraft.description`
was therefore undefined, so `description.trim()` inside launch validation threw a
TypeError that propagated out of the button's onClick. Clicking "Board review &
Start" / "Approve & Start" did nothing, with no feedback — the wall blocking the
whole confirm → task → reap flow.
- Map a proposed draft's description from `objective` as a fallback.
- Make launch validation null-safe.
- Replace the silent early-return with a toast that names what's missing, so a
blocked launch is never a dead, feedback-less button again.
* fix(intake): steer the agent to ask inline, not via AskUserQuestion
The intake's job is to ask clarifying questions, so it reached for the
AskUserQuestion tool — which isn't wired to the live chat panel and isn't in its
allowlist. The bare deny left it to stumble ("let me clarify… — no worries, let
me just lay it out") and waste a visible turn.
- Prompt: spell out that it asks by writing in the chat (the human reads every
message live) and that no question/prompt tool is available to it.
- Gate: give AskUserQuestion a specific deny message that nudges it to ask inline,
so even a reflex attempt degrades gracefully.
Also refresh the now-stale "what happens after propose_draft" section: the draft
card has three choices (Keep chatting / Board review & Start / Approve & Start)
and produces a pending task — not the old two-button "backlog" description.
* feat(intake): copy buttons on agent messages and the draft card
The CEO asked for a way to save the agent's plan/spec elsewhere "just in case" —
a cheap manual backstop until refresh-durability lands.
- New CopyButton: async Clipboard API when available, plus a legacy
textarea+execCommand fallback. The fallback is load-bearing — the panel is
served over plain http on a LAN IP, where navigator.clipboard is absent
(clipboard needs a secure context), so the modern API alone would never copy.
- Copy button under each assistant message (copies its text).
- Copy button on the draft card (copies the full spec as markdown: title,
objective, what-this-builds, the-work per cell, notes, success criteria).
* feat(intake): unbuffer logs + log each turn so the container isn't a black box
Debugging the intake smoke was painful for two reasons: (a) the orchestrator
block-buffered stdout, so `docker logs` lagged minutes behind reality, and (b)
the intake container logged only "session opened" then went silent for the whole
conversation (the chat streams to the relay, not stdout).
- Set PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1 on the orchestrator and agent-base images so structured
logs reach `docker logs` in real time instead of in large delayed chunks.
- Log each intake turn: "turn received" (with char count) and "turn streamed"
(chunk count + whether a draft was emitted), so the container logs show the
conversation's shape at a glance.
* chore(intake): remove the dead ConfirmDialog draft editor
The three-button draft card (Keep chatting / Board review & Start / Approve &
Start) replaced the old review-modal confirm flow, leaving ConfirmDialog and its
sub-editors (StringListEditor, TheWorkEditor) referenced by nothing but the
barrel export. Remove the three files and the export — typecheck + lint confirm
no remaining references.
* fix(intake): coerce bad draft enums on confirm instead of hard-failing
The intake agent is an LLM and will emit off-enum values — e.g. task_type="feature",
which is not a valid TaskType (code/documentation/research/planning/design/
administrative). `_coerce_draft_enums` called `TaskType(value)` directly, which
raised, and the confirm 400'd with "Draft has invalid or missing required fields:
'feature' is not a valid TaskType". That forced the agent to discover the valid
values and self-correct in-chat — unacceptable: clicking "Approve & Start" must
never blow up on a cosmetic enum guess.
Coerce each enum to a sane default on invalid/missing (task_type→code,
nature→technical, complexity→medium); team falls back to the first valid cell in
the_work, then backend. `_lead_cell_team` now skips invalid cell names too. The
confirm/launch action no longer hard-fails on an enum the model got wrong.
* fix(intake): draft card no longer renders above the user's latest message
attachDraft fell back to "the last assistant message anywhere" when the current
turn had no streamed text yet (propose_draft called first). That last message was
often the PREVIOUS turn's — sitting above the user's "Yes, propose it" — so the
draft card rendered above the user's message. Attach only to the current turn's
streaming message; otherwise append a fresh assistant message so the card always
lands at the bottom of the thread.
* test(intake): guard draft enum coercion + invalid-cell skipping
Regression tests for the confirm-time enum coercion: an off-enum task_type
("feature") / nature / complexity coerce to code/technical/medium instead of
raising, and _lead_cell_team skips invalid cell names. Locks in that a bad enum
guess from the agent can never 400 the launch again.
* fix(intake): stop the agent fumbling through Claude Code meta-tools
In smoke it reflexively probed CC built-ins before reaching propose_draft —
plan mode + ExitPlanMode (it announced a written plan and waited instead of
emitting the draft), ToolSearch, Write — each correctly denied by the lockdown
but stumbly, and it only proposed after explicit CEO nudges.
- Gate: ExitPlanMode now gets a specific deny nudge ("you don't use plan mode;
call propose_draft"), and the generic deny names the actual toolset instead
of a bare "not available", so any probe degrades into guidance.
- Prompt: forbid plan mode/ExitPlanMode/ToolSearch explicitly and spell out
"you do not plan and wait — call propose_draft directly when the spec is
ready," plus an anti-pattern bullet.
* feat(intake): make the container logs transparent mid-turn
`docker logs` on the intake container was a black box: only turn start/end, while
the agent read the codebase and spawned 20+ subagents invisibly (the conversation
streams to the relay, not stdout), and the benign 3x ~/.claude.json warning was
the only thing visible.
- Driver logs each tool call mid-turn ("Intake tool use" with the tool name) and
the draft emission, plus a tools count in the turn-streamed summary. Text deltas
stay unlogged (they'd spam). Now the logs show the turn's real shape.
- Pre-create ~/.claude.json ({}) at container boot so the CLI's "config not found"
warning (printed 3x, self-healed anyway) stops drowning the real logs.
* fix(intake): render markdown in user messages + scope copy to code blocks
Two display fixes from the smoke:
- User messages collapsed newlines (plain {content} in a div) and rendered no
markdown — a "1.\n2.\n3." answer showed as one run-on line. Render user AND
assistant bubbles through a shared GFM markdown body that inherits the bubble's
text color, so lists / newlines / styling render correctly on both.
- Copy was blanketed on every assistant message; scope it to KEY parts — a copy
button on fenced code blocks (the draft card keeps its own). Removed the
per-message button.
* fix(intake): prevent duplicate tasks from a double-click on launch
Clicking a draft launch button twice fired two confirms and created duplicate
tasks. Add a synchronous re-entry guard (a ref — no stale-closure window) at the
top of launchTask so a second click returns immediately, and disable + spin the
draft-card buttons while a launch is in flight so it's visually clear it's working.
* docs(how-to): lead task creation with the Task Assistant flow
Rewrite "1 · It starts with you" to walk the Prompter/Task Assistant path —
scope form, the agent reading the codebase, its grounded analysis, the draft
card, and the created task — then flow into the Board review. Replaces the old
manual task-definition form shots.
Image placeholder: images/prompter_draft_card.png (the 3-button card) is
referenced but not yet captured — TODO comment marks it for the next smoke run.
A second comment flags an optional re-capture of prompter_run_2 after the
markdown-rendering fix.
* fix(intake): restore assistant message text contrast
The markdown refactor dropped `dark:prose-invert` and made text inherit the
bubble's color, but the assistant bubble had no explicit text color — so its text
rendered near-invisible (dark-on-dark on bg-muted). Give the assistant bubble an
explicit text-foreground; the user bubble already carries text-primary-foreground,
and [&_*]:!text-inherit now resolves to a readable color on both.
* fix(intake): coerce draft priority too — confirm 500'd on priority="high"
The enum-coercion fix covered task_type/nature/complexity/team, but priority is a
non-enum int field handled by `int(draft_data.get("priority", 2))`, and the agent
guesses a word ("high") as readily as a number — so int("high") raised ValueError
and the confirm 500'd. Same class of bug, one field missed.
Add _coerce_priority: map words (urgent/high/medium/low → 0/1/2/3), clamp numbers
to 0-3, default to 2 (medium) on anything else. The launch can no longer crash on
any field the LLM guessed. + regression test.
* fix(intake): draft card shows distinct cells, not one badge per work item
the_work has one entry per work item, so a cell with several items rendered its
badge repeatedly ("Board-led across Backend Backend Backend Frontend Frontend
…"). De-dupe to distinct teams so the card reads "Board-led across Backend
Frontend" — and the "Cell:" vs "Board-led across" label keys off distinct count.
* docs(how-to): hero the teaser gif + resolve the Prompter/Task Assistant thread
- Move the 12s teaser gif to the top as the hero — it was buried between the
"prefer video" link and the first screenshot.
- Name the connection: the Task Assistant IS the Prompter, so section 1 (using
the tool) and the rest (RoboCo building it) read as one story — you use the
tool the company built for itself, then watch the build.
- Re-anchor the section 1 → Board transition to follow the Prompter's own
journey, instead of implying section 1's example task is the one reviewed next.
* Included images for how-to.md
* docs(how-to): align agent count to 20 (matches README + CLAUDE.md)
The how-to said "18 agents" with UX/UI at one dev and no Intake — stale against
the authoritative count. Bump 18→20 (prose + spelled-out eighteen→twenty), give
UX/UI 2 devs, and add the Intake line to the org tree (Intake leads section 1, so
it belongs in the tree). README + CLAUDE.md already say 20.
* ci(release): publish all RoboCo images to GHCR + Docker Hub
The release published only the orchestrator to GHCR. Build and push the full set
the stack needs — agent-base, the 8 agent images, orchestrator, and panel — to
BOTH ghcr.io/rennf93/* and docker.io/renzof93/*, at :<version> and :latest, so
consumers can pull instead of compose-building.
- agent-base builds first (the agent images build FROM roboco-agent-base, a local
tag), then the rest; push only after every build succeeds.
- Image names mirror the docker-compose `image:` values 1:1.
- Free disk on the runner first (11 images is space-heavy).
- Needs a DOCKERHUB_TOKEN repo secret for the Docker Hub login.
- SECURITY.md updated to reference both registries.
* ci(release): use short SHA as the image tag on manual dispatch
A workflow_dispatch runs against a branch, and the branch name (e.g.
feature/prompter-gold-upgrade) was used verbatim as the image tag — but "/" is
illegal in a Docker tag, so the first build failed instantly with "invalid
reference format". Releases still tag from the release tag; manual dispatch now
always uses the short SHA, which is a valid tag.
---------
Co-authored-by: Renn F <rennf93@users.noreply.github.com>
|
||
|
|
207aaecd72 |
Feature: lifecycle canonical spec (#14)
* chore: clean make quality baseline on feature/lifecycle-canonical-spec
Three classes of pre-existing issues blocking `make quality`:
1. Alembic migrations 002/009/011 used runtime introspection
(op.get_bind() + inspect / bind.execute) without guarding for
offline (--sql) mode. `alembic upgrade head --sql` is part of
`make quality`; in offline mode `op.get_bind()` returns a
MockConnection with no inspection system, so the migrations
crashed before emitting their SQL stubs. Each migration now
short-circuits or simplifies in `context.is_offline_mode()` —
live-DB behavior is unchanged.
2. ruff format drift on three files left over from prior in-flight
edits (choreographer/_impl.py, content_actions.py, and one test
file). `ruff format` applied.
3. vulture flagged two unused `tb` parameters in async __aexit__
stubs in test_task_service_lifecycle_misc.py. The parameter is
protocol-required but unused by the body — renamed to `_tb`
(vulture treats underscore-prefixed names as intentionally unused).
`make quality` is now green from this branch's HEAD; subsequent
lifecycle-spec work can use it as the per-task gate.
* feat(lifecycle): canonical spec package + Role/Status/TaskType enums
Foundation for the canonical lifecycle/permissions module. Enums
mirror docs/internal/old/workflows/STATUS_TRANSITIONS.md +
PERMISSIONS.md. Tests pin enum membership against both the
predecessor canon and roboco.models.base.TaskType.
* feat(lifecycle): Decision dataclass with allow/reject/tracing_gap constructors
Single rejection shape every consumer maps to its native format
(Envelope, HTTP code, prompt hint). __post_init__ enforces the
allowed/rejection_kind invariants so a malformed Decision can't reach
a consumer.
* fix(lifecycle): tighten Decision invariants per Task 2 review
Two reviewer findings on the Task 2 Decision dataclass, addressed
in one commit:
1. The docstring promised `allowed=True ⇒ rejection_kind is None
AND missing == [] AND remediate is None`, but __post_init__ only
checked the rejection_kind half. A caller could construct an
allow-shaped Decision with stale missing/remediate fields and
sneak it past validation. Tighten __post_init__ to enforce the
full invariant. Add a regression test.
2. tracing_gap defensively copies the missing list (`list(missing)`)
to isolate the stored list from later caller-side mutation, but
no test pinned this. Add a regression test that mutates the source
list after construction and asserts the stored list is unchanged.
Issue 2 from the same review (mutable list vs tuple for `missing`)
is a broader design call deferred until consumers exist; the
defensive copy is sufficient until then.
* feat(lifecycle): Precondition/ActionSpec/IntentSpec/StatusTransition dataclasses
The four dataclasses that hold the canonical tables. ActionSpec and
StatusTransition are direct ports of pre-gateway PERMISSIONS.md +
STATUS_TRANSITIONS.md rows. IntentSpec is the gateway-only addition:
each gateway intent verb declares which atomic actions it composes.
* feat(lifecycle): _STATUS_TRANSITIONS table + STATUS_GRAPH view
Direct port of STATUS_TRANSITIONS.md. Every transition records its
trigger action and (optionally) a role constraint. STATUS_GRAPH is
the precomputed source→{targets} view callers use for reachability
checks.
* fix(lifecycle): pin role_constraint values + clarify Task-5 handoff
Two reviewer findings on Task 4 _STATUS_TRANSITIONS, addressed in
one commit:
1. The original Task-4 tests verified (source, target) pairs but
not role_constraint contents. A typo in a single role name (e.g.
forgetting MAIN_PM from escalate_to_ceo) would have slipped past
them silently. Add test_status_transitions_role_constraints_match_canon
pinning every non-None constraint and the cancel-block invariant.
2. role_constraint=None on the `claim` rows from PENDING and
NEEDS_REVISION was load-bearing — it is the explicit handoff
point between the StatusTransition table (state machine layer)
and CLAIM_RULES (per-role claim authority, lands in Task 5).
The original inline comment said this in passing; expand it so
the design choice is unmissable for a stranger reading just
spec.py.
* feat(lifecycle): _ATOMIC_ACTIONS + CLAIM_RULES + ROLE_TEAM_RULES tables
Direct port of PERMISSIONS.md. Every task management tool gets an
ActionSpec with allowed_roles, source_statuses, target_status,
self_review_block, and needs_team_match flags. CLAIM_RULES maps each
Role to the statuses they can claim from. ROLE_TEAM_RULES is the
per-slug team restriction.
* fix(lifecycle): tighten ActionSpec contracts per Task 5 review
Three reviewer findings on Task 5's _ATOMIC_ACTIONS table, addressed
in one commit:
1. set_plan.source_statuses widened to {CLAIMED, IN_PROGRESS} but
every existing caller (i_will_work_on / i_will_plan compositions)
runs set_plan while CLAIMED, between claim and start. Narrow to
{CLAIMED} only. If a future "edit plan mid-flight" feature lands,
widen explicitly with test coverage at that time.
2. needs_team_match was set True only on claim/qa_pass/qa_fail/
docs_complete. Defense-in-depth says every role-scoped task
action should re-assert team match (don't rely on the inheritance
chain through assigned_to alone). Flip to True on: start,
set_plan, block, pause, submit_verification, submit_qa,
submit_pm_review, complete, create_subtask. Leave False on
board/CEO actions and PM cross-cell interventions (unblock,
resume, cancel) where the cross-cell semantics are intentional.
3. claim.source_statuses is intentionally a SUPERSET of any single
role's CLAIM_RULES allowance (the table holds the union; CLAIM_RULES
holds the per-role authority). Add an inline comment above the
claim ActionSpec so a future reader doesn't conclude the two
tables disagree — they don't, they encode overlapping facts at
different grains.
* feat(lifecycle): _INTENT_VERBS table — every gateway verb declared
Each gateway intent verb is now a named composition of atomic actions
plus optional side effects. i_will_work_on = (claim, set_plan, start);
i_am_done = (submit_verification, submit_qa); open_pr is pure side
effects (push_branch, create_pr); etc.
* fix(lifecycle): widen block.allowed_roles to include QA + Documenter
Task 6 review caught a role-set inconsistency: i_am_blocked.allowed_roles
admits dev/QA/doc, but the underlying block.allowed_roles only allowed
dev+PM. Result: a QA or documenter calling i_am_blocked would pass the
IntentSpec gate and then be rejected by the composed ActionSpec gate
when Task 7 wires can_invoke_intent.
Widen block to include QA + Documenter. The semantic case is sound: a
QA reviewing a task can discover an external blocker; a documenter
writing docs may need PM intervention. Predecessor PERMISSIONS.md
restricted block to dev+PM, but with the gateway exposing i_am_blocked
to all worker roles, the underlying atomic must agree.
The deeper unclaim/escalate_up "imperative verb" concern from the same
review (composes=() but mutates state) is deferred to Task 8 where the
validator design lands.
* feat(lifecycle): public lookup functions + Context + preconditions
can_claim, can_invoke_action, can_invoke_intent, valid_next_verbs,
composed_actions_for, intents_for_role, status_after — the entire
public surface every consumer will use. Context carries the
caller-supplied state preconditions need (plan, journal-decision
flag, etc.). Preconditions for plan/commits/no_pr/ownership are
declared once and wired into the relevant IntentSpecs.
* fix(lifecycle): wire PRECONDITION_OWNERSHIP through Context.actor_id
Task 7 review found _p_owns_task reads agent.id but every call site
passes None for the agent arg. Result: getattr(None, "id", object())
returns a fresh sentinel, task.assigned_to == <sentinel> is always
False, and open_pr / i_am_done would reject every owner the moment
Task 9 wires consumers.
Fix: thread identity through Context.actor_id (new UUID field) and
rewrite _p_owns_task to read from the context. Both call sites already
pass the Context — no signature changes elsewhere. Add green-path
test exercising the owner-can-open-pr case the existing tests
missed (the Task 7 plan only tested precondition-failure paths,
which masked the bug).
Plus surface hygiene: STATUS_GRAPH, CLAIM_RULES, ROLE_TEAM_RULES,
and the four PRECONDITION_* constants are now in
roboco.lifecycle.__init__.__all__ so consumers in Tasks 8/9 don't
depend on the implicit `from roboco.lifecycle.spec import ...`
backdoor.
* feat(lifecycle): import-time self-consistency validators
10 validators run at module import; first failure raises
LifecycleSpecError and prevents the package from loading. Covers
status enum coverage, reachability, terminal exits, intent
compositions, status chain consistency, claim-rule role/status
coverage, self-review symmetry, team-rule slug existence, and
StatusTransition action references.
* fix(lifecycle): close validator gaps; resolve BACKLOG-claim and submit_qa IN_PROGRESS-shortcut ambiguity
Three reviewer follow-ups on Task 8's _validate.py, plus two real
data corrections the new action-target-reachability validator
surfaced.
1. Design spec §9 calls for "every ActionSpec.target_status, when
set, is reachable from each source_status via STATUS_GRAPH" —
missing from Task 8's 10 validators. Add
_check_action_target_reachable_from_source.
2. _check_role_team_rules_slugs verified slug existence in
AGENT_UUIDS but NOT that the cell team in ROLE_TEAM_RULES
matches the seed. Add _check_role_team_rules_team_match,
scoped to non-None entries only — None means "exempt from
team-match enforcement" (cross-cell roles), not "no team in
org chart".
3. test_validators_pass_on_real_spec was ceremonial. Add
test_run_all_validators_raises_on_unknown_intent_action,
a deliberate-break regression that monkeypatches _INTENT_VERBS
to inject a fake action and asserts LifecycleSpecError raises.
The new action-target-reachability validator caught two real
data inconsistencies between the predecessor canon docs and the
spec tables:
A. claim.source_statuses listed BACKLOG and CLAIM_RULES[*PM]
listed BACKLOG, but STATUS_GRAPH[BACKLOG] = {PENDING, CANCELLED}
only. Resolution: PMs use the explicit \`activate\` action to
move BACKLOG → PENDING, then claim from PENDING. Drop BACKLOG
from claim.source_statuses and CLAIM_RULES.
B. submit_qa.source_statuses listed IN_PROGRESS, but
STATUS_GRAPH[IN_PROGRESS] does NOT include AWAITING_QA. The
intent verb i_am_done composes (submit_verification, submit_qa)
which forces IN_PROGRESS → VERIFYING → AWAITING_QA — no
shortcut. Drop the stale IN_PROGRESS entry from
submit_qa.source_statuses.
Both corrections tighten the canonical state machine to a strict
no-skip transition graph. Pre-gateway PERMISSIONS.md/STATUS_TRANSITIONS.md
disagreements are resolved here; spec.py is the canon now.
* feat(gateway): Envelope.from_decision maps lifecycle Decisions to envelopes
Single shape adapter so verb bodies stop hand-composing rejection
envelopes. Each rejection_kind maps to a specific envelope flavor;
'self_review' folds into 'not_authorized' with a parenthetical hint;
constructing from an allow Decision raises (programmer error).
* feat(gateway): VerbRunner for atomic composed-action dispatch
Wraps spec.composed_actions_for(intent) in session.begin_nested()
so mid-sequence failures roll the DB back. Side effects run AFTER
the savepoint commits. Each atomic action name dispatches to a
TaskService method via a single, exhaustive _dispatch_atomic
mapping. New verbs slot in by adding an IntentSpec entry + a
_dispatch_atomic case if a new atomic is needed.
* refactor(gateway): i_will_work_on uses spec.can_invoke_intent + VerbRunner
Replace the bespoke status-branch dispatcher in i_will_work_on with the
spec-driven flow: load task -> load agent -> build spec.Context ->
spec.can_invoke_intent (and spec.can_claim for per-role status authority)
-> Envelope.from_decision on rejection -> VerbRunner.run_intent on success.
The _i_will_work_on_pending, _i_will_work_on_claimed,
_i_will_work_on_needs_revision, and _start_failed_envelope helpers are
removed; the runner replaces them. Two narrow verb-body re-entry blocks
remain for behaviors the spec does not yet model:
1. in_progress + same agent -> idempotent heartbeat-only return
2. claimed + same agent -> _resume_from_claimed (set_plan + start)
to recover from a stuck mid-claim crash without re-running claim
against a state the spec excludes.
The behavioral claim guards (already_active / paused / sibling_sequence)
also stay imperative for now -- they're not in the spec yet and migrate
into spec.extra_preconditions in a later task. Per-role claim authority
is enforced via spec.can_claim because the atomic claim action's
source_statuses are the union across roles; CLAIM_RULES narrows.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py runs the verb
against every (role x status x task_type='code') combo (112 rows) and
asserts the envelope error matches the spec's Decision (or can_claim's
Decision when the intent gate passes but per-role claim authority does
not). This is the contract that makes spec/verb drift impossible.
Existing tests updated where rejection-message text changed (the spec
now produces the messages, e.g. "role 'cell_pm' may not call
'i_will_work_on'" instead of "PM cannot execute code") or where the
spec's stricter view ("invalid_state" -> "not_authorized" for a dev
trying to claim awaiting_qa) is more accurate. Test fixtures were
updated to wire task.session.begin_nested as a proper async context
manager (required by VerbRunner) and to set agent_for().id so runner-
driven calls line up with assert_awaited_with(task_id, agent_id).
* refactor(lifecycle): push CLAIM_RULES enforcement into can_invoke_action
Task 11's i_will_work_on migration had to call spec.can_claim()
separately after spec.can_invoke_intent() because the claim action's
source_statuses is the union across all claim-eligible roles —
can_invoke_intent alone would let a developer pass for claiming
awaiting_qa (a QA-only state).
The retrofit pattern would repeat in every claim-composing verb
(i_will_plan, claim_review, claim_doc_task). Push the per-role
narrowing inside can_invoke_action when the action is "claim",
using the same not_authorized vs invalid_state disambiguation
can_claim already implemented (status-reserved-for-another-role
returns not_authorized; status-no-role-can-claim returns
invalid_state). Extracted the body to _check_claim_rules_narrow
to keep can_invoke_action under xenon's complexity threshold.
Update _i_will_work_on_gate to drop the redundant spec.can_claim
call. Update test_consumer_parity.py to assert only against
can_invoke_intent's Decision.
Tasks 12-22 will inherit the cleaner pattern: spec.can_invoke_intent
is the single gate; verb bodies don't need per-action retrofits.
* refactor(gateway): i_will_plan uses spec.can_invoke_intent + VerbRunner
Migrates i_will_plan to the spec-driven pattern Task 11 set up for
i_will_work_on. The verb body now: (1) loads task + agent, (2) builds
Context, (3) checks idempotent/recovery re-entry, (4) calls
spec.can_invoke_intent, (5) returns Envelope.from_decision on
rejection, (6) delegates composition to VerbRunner. The
_i_will_plan_* helpers are removed — the runner replaces them.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py runs the verb
against every (role × status × task_type) combo and asserts the
envelope matches spec.Decision.
* refactor(gateway): delegate uses spec.can_invoke_intent for role/state gate
Migrates delegate to the spec-driven role/state gate. The chain
validation (main_pm->cell_pm, cell_pm->its team's devs), the
assignee-vs-task_type rule (Cell PMs receive planning-typed only),
the enum coercion, and the parent-lifecycle/cap guards STAY in the
verb body — they encode delegate-specific semantics the spec
doesn't model.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py asserts the
spec's role+state rejection is correctly surfaced. Chain/assignee
rejections continue to be tested in test_choreographer_pm_extras.
* refactor(gateway): open_pr uses spec.can_invoke_intent + VerbRunner
Migrates open_pr to spec-driven gating. The spec's
extra_preconditions (PRECONDITION_OWNERSHIP, PRECONDITION_COMMITS,
PRECONDITION_NO_PR) handle all three precondition checks; the verb
body delegates side-effect dispatch (push_branch, create_pr) to
VerbRunner.
Idempotent re-entry retained: an open_pr call against a task that
already has a PR (and the caller owns it) returns OK without
re-opening, rather than the tracing_gap the spec would otherwise
produce. This preserves agent ergonomics — two calls in a row
shouldn't surface a misleading "no_prior_pr" hint.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py runs the verb
against representative (status x commits x pr_number) combos and
asserts the envelope matches spec.Decision.
* refactor(gateway): i_am_done uses spec.can_invoke_intent + VerbRunner
Migrates i_am_done to spec-driven gating. The spec's
extra_preconditions (PRECONDITION_OWNERSHIP, PRECONDITION_COMMITS)
handle ownership and commit-count checks; VerbRunner dispatches
the (submit_verification, submit_qa) atomic chain.
The tracing-gate preconditions (progress entry, journal:reflect,
acceptance criteria) and the field-level submit-qa gates stay in
the verb body — they model gates the spec doesn't yet cover.
Defense-in-depth: those gates run after the spec accepts the
ownership/commits checks.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py runs the
verb against (role × status × ownership × commits) and asserts
the envelope matches spec.Decision.
* refactor(gateway): i_am_blocked uses spec.can_invoke_intent + VerbRunner
Migrates i_am_blocked to spec-driven gating. The journal:struggle
write stays in the verb body (it's a side effect outside the
lifecycle action). VerbRunner dispatches the `block` atomic action
via task_service.escalate.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py.
* refactor(gateway): unclaim and resume use spec.can_invoke_intent
Migrates both verbs to the spec-driven gate. unclaim's verb body
keeps its dispatch (task.unclaim_for_agent) because composes=();
resume goes through VerbRunner with composes=("resume",).
The reassignment-rejection branch (introduced in
|