mirror of
https://github.com/rennf93/roboco.git
synced 2026-08-03 07:23:24 +02:00
250be5c2464f3f620a03df9660519371aa439dc0
10
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5612375cba |
Feat/v0.13.0 (#270)
* feat(release): add release-manager feature flag (default off) * feat(release): change classification + semver-bump derivation * feat(release): readiness audit (changelog/version-ref/docs/migration/gate) * feat(release): release-manager engine proposes a gated release * feat(release): fail-closed release executor (bump, gate, publish) * feat(release): CEO approve/reject release-proposal surface * docs(release): document the gated release manager * feat(memory): add org-memory feature flags (default off) * feat(memory): add playbooks table + status enum + migration * feat(memory): playbook service with auditor curation transitions * feat(memory): playbooks RAG index plugin * feat(memory): index a playbook into RAG on approval * feat(memory): distill a high-signal lesson at task completion * feat(memory): keep private journal reflections out of the shared RAG corpus * feat(memory): draft_playbook verb + auditor curation verbs * fix(ci): resolve mypy tests/ errors blocking the gate (UUID casts, annotations) * feat(memory): auto-inject similar lessons/playbooks into the briefing * feat(memory): auditor playbook review queue (api + panel) * docs(memory): document the org-memory loop + playbook verbs * fix(provisioning): idempotent pitch provisioning (reuse product/project by slug on re-approval) * fix(memory): add chunks_playbooks to the chunk schema + isolate release route tests - Migration 030's CHUNK_TABLES was missing chunks_playbooks, breaking the IndexType<->migration parity guard once the PLAYBOOKS index landed. The upgrade is ALTER ... IF EXISTS so adding it is safe on any DB shape. - The release-route fixture's approve/reject paths call db.commit() (real behavior), so a held proposal outlived the per-test rollback and leaked into engine tests that read the global list_open_release_proposals(). Tear down source=release_manager rows after each test. - Make the gather_snapshot real-repo smoke version-agnostic (semver match) so it stops pinning the literal repo version. * chore(release): 0.13.0 * ++ --------- Co-authored-by: Renn F <rennf93@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
5fe1e6df58 |
feat: in-path PR-review gate — per-cell + main reviewers (#229)
* feat(lifecycle): add the in-path PR-review gate status + reviewer verbs
Insert awaiting_pr_review between the assembled-PR submit and the PM merge,
giving the merge level the rejection capability it structurally lacks — today
only qa_fail and ceo_reject ever reach needs_revision, so a PM review is a
merge button with no teeth.
- New Status awaiting_pr_review + submit_for_review / pr_pass / pr_fail actions
(pr_pass -> awaiting_pm_review, pr_fail -> needs_revision, mirroring the QA gate).
- Reviewer verbs claim_gate_review / pr_pass / pr_fail, and a main-PM submit_root
verb (the root analogue of the cell PM's submit_up; opens the root->master PR).
- Extend the self-review-symmetry validator to the new sign-off actions.
- Mirror the value into the ORM TaskStatus enum + the A2A state map, and add the
postgres taskstatus enum value (migration 040, forward-only like 037).
- Regenerate the per-role verb tables; add gate spec tests.
Spec surface only; the gateway methods + dispatch are wired in follow-ups, so the
verbs are advertised but dormant (flow_server tolerates unregistered verbs).
* feat(identity): add the three cell PR-review-gate reviewers
The in-path gate needs a reviewer per cell so each cell's assembled cell->root
PR is reviewed by a stack-specialized agent, while pr-reviewer-1 serves the
root->master gate (and keeps doing inbound external PRs).
- be/fe/ux-pr-reviewer: PR_REVIEWER role, team-scoped (so dispatch routes each
cell's gate to its own reviewer); seeded identities + ROLE_TEAM_RULES + names.
AI agent count 22 -> 25.
- They reuse the existing roboco-agent-pr-reviewer image (AGENT_IMAGES maps the
three slugs to it, as be-dev-1/-2 share one image) — no new image.
- Tracing table: pr_pass/pr_fail require a learning entry (parity with
post_pr_review), submit_root mirrors submit_up, claim_gate_review is waived
(its tracing applies on pr_pass/pr_fail) — completes the verb surface added
in the prior commit.
- Update the roster-pinning identity tests.
* feat(gateway): wire the in-path PR-review gate end to end
Make the assembled-PR review gate operational across the choreographer, the
TaskService transitions, and the v1 flow surface.
- TaskService: submit_for_review (in_progress→awaiting_pr_review), pr_gate_claim
(no-transition reviewer claim), pr_pass (→awaiting_pm_review), pr_fail
(→needs_revision); mirror qa_pass/qa_fail (clear claim, actor-mismatch warn,
issues appended for the PM's revision). VerbRunner gains the matching atomic
handlers + a create_root_pr side effect.
- Repoint submit_up to compose submit_for_review (cell→root PR enters the gate),
and add a main-PM submit_root verb (opens the root→master PR, enters the gate).
- Split main_pm_complete: a code root must pass the gate first (requires
awaiting_pm_review; rejects an in_progress code root toward submit_root and no
longer reopens the PR), while a branchless coordination root still walks
straight through, ungated.
- PRGateMixin (claim_gate_review / pr_pass / pr_fail) composed onto the
Choreographer; flow_server forwarders + v1 routes (pr_reviewer + main_pm) +
request schemas.
- Tests: gate spec + the updated submit_up / main_pm_complete expectations + new
real-DB integration tests driving submit_for_review→pr_gate_claim→pr_pass and
pr_fail through the real enforcement layer.
* feat(orchestrator): dispatch the in-path PR-review gate
Make the gate live in the dispatch loop.
- _dispatch_pr_gate_work: route awaiting_pr_review tasks to reviewers by level —
a cell→root task to its cell reviewer (be/fe/ux-pr-reviewer), the root→master
task to pr-reviewer-1. The reviewer self-claims via claim_gate_review (no
pre-claim, mirroring the external-PR dispatcher); registered in
_dispatch_all_work. _select_agent_for_cell learns the pr_reviewer role.
- _build_pr_gate_prompt: anchors the reviewer to the parent objective + full
acceptance criteria + the FE<->BE contract, then pr_pass / pr_fail.
- _readiness_check_role_for_status: awaiting_pr_review -> pr_reviewer.
- Fail routing: pr_fail reassigns the failed assembled task to its PM
(_revision_pm_for_task: cell PM for a cell team, Main PM for the root), and the
revision dispatcher is generalized from coordination-roots-only to any
PM-owned needs_revision task so the gate-failed task is re-coordinated instead
of deadlocking.
* docs: document the in-path PR-review gate + the cell reviewers (22→25)
Reflect the shipped gate across the canonical + RAG docs.
- CLAUDE.md: agent count 22→25, the cell reviewers in the org chart, an
awaiting_pr_review state + the gate transitions + a gate note in the lifecycle
section, and submit_root / claim_gate_review / pr_pass / pr_fail in the verb
surface table.
- docs/rag/architecture: org-structure (count, cell-reviewer roster, cells
table), agent-uuids (be/fe/ux-pr-reviewer rows), agent-model (role + team
rows).
- docs/rag/roles/pr-reviewer: the in-path gate section + the gate verbs.
- Wrap reviewer.id with UUID(str(...)) in the gate DB tests for mypy.
* docs: finish the gate doc sweep across README + RAG + generated artifacts
Catch the remaining surfaces beyond the canonical docs.
- README + how-to: agent count 22→25, the 6-agent cells (+ PR Reviewer), the
main reviewer's root→master gate role.
- RAG: permissions + tool-permissions + task-tools list the gate verbs
(claim_gate_review / pr_pass / pr_fail) for pr_reviewer; regenerate the
lifecycle artifacts (intent-verbs, status-transitions, the per-role
lifecycle-*.md prompts, panel lifecycle.json) from the spec via
build_lifecycle_artifacts.py so they carry the new status + verbs.
* fix(migration): shorten the 040 revision id to fit alembic_version VARCHAR(32)
The revision id '040_taskstatus_awaiting_pr_review' is 33 chars; alembic's
alembic_version.version_num column is VARCHAR(32), so recording the migration on
a real 'alembic upgrade head' failed with 'value too long for type character
varying(32)' (surfaced on the NAS deploy). The test suite missed it: the test DB
is built via Base.metadata.create_all and the parity test only renders SQL
offline, so nothing actually applied the migration chain.
- Rename to '040_awaiting_pr_review' (22 chars).
- Add a guard test asserting every revision id fits the VARCHAR(32) column.
- Verified by applying the full chain 001->040 against real Postgres: it now
reaches head and records '040_awaiting_pr_review' without truncation.
* fix(migration): land the actual 040 revision-id shortening + guard test
The prior commit captured only the file rename (git add aborted on the deleted
old path), leaving the long revision id and missing the guard test. This commit
carries the real content: revision id '040_awaiting_pr_review' (22 chars) and the
revision-id length guard. Re-verified against real Postgres — the full chain
reaches head and records the short id without truncation.
* fix(product): flush cell deletes before inserts when re-mapping projects
Editing a product's cell->project map (PATCH /api/products/{id}) 409'd with
'duplicate key value violates unique constraint uq_product_projects_product_team'
whenever a team already had a mapping. _replace_cells clears the old rows and
appends the new ones, but within a single flush SQLAlchemy orders INSERTs before
DELETEs for the same table, so the new (product_id, team) rows collided with the
not-yet-deleted old ones. Flush the deletes first.
Pre-existing bug (unrelated to the PR-review gate); surfaced on the NAS. New
real-Postgres regression test re-maps all three cells to different projects —
it fails with the unique violation without the fix and passes with it. The
existing update test only changed WHICH team was mapped, so it never collided.
* fix(gateway): let main_pm submit_root past the shared submit-up guard
submit_root reused the cell PM's _submit_up_ownership_guard, which
hardcoded agent.role != cell_pm and rejected the Main PM with
"submit_up is reserved for cell_pm". A branch-bearing code root could
then never close: submit_root bounced to complete, while complete
required awaiting_pm_review (reachable only via submit_root) and bounced
back — a circular rejection.
Both callers already run the spec gate (can_invoke_intent), which
enforces submit_up→cell_pm and submit_root→main_pm, so the guard's role
re-check was redundant for submit_up and wrong for submit_root. Broaden
it to accept either PM role as a defense-in-depth non-PM reject.
Adds the first choreographer-level submit_root test (the gap that let
this ship).
* fix(gateway): proactively steer both PMs to their bubble-up verb
The submit_root deadlock had a sibling steering gap: nothing told a PM
which verb opens the gate. The delegate next-hint said only 'i_am_idle
when done', and complete's in_progress rejection named submit_root for
the Main PM but left the Cell PM with a bare 'not ready for completion'
— no submit_up pointer, the same guess-the-verb trap.
- delegate hint now names the role-correct verb (root → submit_root,
cell parent → submit_up) proactively, before any rejection.
- cell_pm_complete's in_progress rejection now steers to submit_up,
mirroring the Main PM's submit_root gate hint.
Tests cover both the cell-PM steer and the role-aware delegate hint.
* docs: correct who-merges-which-PR across the gate docs + complete description
Audit of the gate docs found the merge actors mis-stated in several
places — the exact ambiguity that risks 'the reviewer/PM merges the root
PR' confusion:
- complete IntentSpec description said 'Main PM merges root PR' — false;
main_pm_complete escalates and the CEO merges root→master. Corrected
(propagated to intent-verbs.md, lifecycle.json, generated role prompts
via build_lifecycle_artifacts.py).
- task-tools.md: submit_up target was awaiting_pm_review (should be
awaiting_pr_review); Main PM flow had no submit_root — added it.
- README.md: lifecycle diagram now shows the awaiting_pr_review gate.
- cell-pm.md / main-pm.md: dropped the stale 'submit_up hands work to the
Main PM who merges your cell branch' model — the cell PM merges its own
gated cell→root PR; the Main PM owns the root + submit_root; the CEO
merges master. Added submit_root to the main-pm manifest.
- git-commits.md, pr-creation.md, tool-permissions.md, git-tools.md:
stopped attributing root→master PR opening to complete (it's submit_root).
No behavior change; verb wiring + state machine verified gap-free this
session (the pr_fail→needs_revision→PM respawn loop closes correctly).
* fix(orchestrator): stop closure respawn waiting the reaper window
A PM that finished its subtasks and idled left its parent 'paused' with a
fresh last_heartbeat_at. _is_recently_paused gated closure respawn on
_claim_heartbeat_ttl — the REAPER window (stale_claim_reap_seconds: 600s
default, 1800s on the NAS) — so the parent sat untouched for up to 10-30
minutes before its PM was respawned to close it. The whole chain stalled
behind it.
The race that guard actually protects against (i_am_idle auto-pauses, then
the agent is marked IDLE + its container tears down) is seconds, and the
live-session case is already covered by _is_agent_active. Introduce a
dedicated short debounce (pm_closure_recently_paused_seconds, default 45s)
and gate closure on that instead.
The existing test fixture masked this by setting _claim_heartbeat_ttl to
claim_stale_seconds (180s), not the production reaper value. Fixture now
mirrors production; adds a regression test that a parent paused past the
debounce but within the reaper window respawns immediately.
* feat(gate): post the in-path review verdict on the assembled PR
The in-path gate previously left no trace on the PR it gated — pr_pass /
pr_fail were pure status transitions. Now each verdict is posted as a
GitHub review on the assembled PR itself (server-side, bot account), so
the decision is visible on the very PR the PM merges.
- pr_pass → APPROVE, pr_fail → REQUEST_CHANGES on a cell→root PR.
- The root→master PR ALWAYS gets a plain COMMENT, never APPROVE/REQUEST_
CHANGES: only the CEO acts on master, so the gate must never leave an
approval that could satisfy branch protection (letting someone else
merge) nor a blocking review that could impede the CEO's merge.
- Best-effort and AFTER the DB transition — a GitHub failure is logged,
never rolls back the gate decision. Reuses git.post_pr_review's existing
self-review→COMMENT downgrade for the org's own PRs.
Adds _project_slug_for to the ChoreographerHelpers protocol (mypy) and a
unit suite covering event selection, the master-bound COMMENT rule, the
no-PR skip, and failure-swallowing. Docs updated (pr-reviewer, task-tools).
---------
Co-authored-by: Renn F <rennf93@users.noreply.github.com>
|
||
|
Renn F
|
5bea82dbbc |
fix(gateway): resolve adversarial-review findings on the pr_reviewer flow
An adversarial review of the feature found two blocking defects (both would surface the moment external_pr_enabled is turned on) plus hardening gaps: - HIGH: the enforcement legacy role-gate overlay OVERWROTE spec-derived roles, so pr_reviewer was erased from the (in_progress->completed) edge it shares with the PM self-complete gate — the review task could never complete. Fix: UNION legacy + spec roles instead of overwriting (also preserves the legacy 'add roles' intent on every shared edge). - HIGH: claim_pr_review routed claim+start through the verb runner, which hit start()'s plan gate (planless review task -> None -> crash/respawn loop) and auto-created+pushed a stray branch (violating the read-only/branchless invariant). Fix: mirror QA's claim_review — a verb-body TaskService.pr_review_claim does pending->in_progress with no plan and no branch. - MED: add the pr_reviewer Write(*)/Edit(*) deny at the permission layer (it ingests untrusted PR diffs — make read-only explicit, not implicit). - MED: regenerate the verb-table artifacts (the schemas existed but the generator had not been re-run; the agent prompt showed 'unknown' signatures). ruff + mypy clean (279 files); foundation + gateway suites green (5205 passed). |
||
|
Renn F
|
5902c0fe38 |
feat(roles): add the read-only pr_reviewer role end-to-end
A global, read-only PR reviewer agent (pr-reviewer-1) that reviews inbound external/fork PRs and posts one change-request. Wired end-to-end: - identity: Role.PR_REVIEWER + agent + ROLE_LEVEL (QA-peer) + REVIEWER_ROLES - lifecycle: CLAIM_RULES + ROLE_TEAM_RULES + a dedicated claim_pr_review / post_pr_review verb pair (distinct from QA's) + the pr_review_done action and its in_progress->completed transition; give_me_work / i_am_idle gain the role - role_config: a read-only RoleConfig (allows_write=False) - journaling: ALL_CELLS read tier so it can read internal intent like QA - tracing: post_pr_review requires a learning entry; claim_pr_review is waived - seeds presentation + factory prompt layer + builtin tools + the agentrole enum migration (037) + regenerated verb/lifecycle artifacts Read-only at /app like QA/auditor; default-off — nothing dispatches review work until external_pr_enabled. Foundation + role-config + enum suites green; ruff + mypy clean; orchestrator boots. |
||
|
Renn F
|
92543ad593 |
chore(prompts): stop generating verb tables for driver-based roles
regenerate_verb_tables.py looped every role in ROLE_CONFIGS, emitting a _generated/<role>.md for prompter and secretary too. Both intentionally keep only note+evidence in role_config — their real tools live in their agent_sdk drivers (intake: propose_draft; secretary: read_state/read_task/ submit_directive, the last gated through the backend /directives), and neither uses the _generated/<role>.md prompt-composition path. So the generated tables understated those roles and showed up as perpetually-untracked noise. Skip the driver-based roles (_DRIVER_BASED_ROLES) in both the aggregate verbs.md and the per-role file output, with a comment pointing at the real surfaces. Regenerated verbs.md drops the two misleading sections. |
||
|
Renn F
|
1fb723174a |
feat(gateway): decomposition coverage gate + AC visibility (guardrails spec 2)
The decomposition floor that pairs with the roll-up gate (spec 4): a PM
cannot finish decomposing a parent while one of its acceptance criteria has
no subtask responsible for it — the "two leaves, half the ACs silently
dropped" pattern. Three parts:
- Gate: i_am_idle is rejected for a cell_pm/main_pm whose owned parent still
has criteria in unclaimed_parent_acceptance_criteria (claimed = referenced
by any live, non-cancelled child). Distinct from the roll-up gate, which
fires at submit_up/complete and demands a *completed* child; this fires
earlier and asks only that every criterion be *claimed*. Safe-by-
construction: inert until a PM declares coverage, so legacy / not-yet-
adopted decompositions are never blocked.
- Visibility: PM-facing briefings (give_me_work, i_will_plan, submit_up) and
every delegate response now carry parent_ac_coverage ({id,text,claimed,
verified} per criterion) + unclaimed_parent_acs, so a PM can map subtasks
to criterion ids via covers_parent_criteria and see what is still
uncovered after each delegate. Off for leaf roles, so a developer's own
criteria never surface as bogus "unclaimed" noise.
- Prompts: cell_pm / main_pm role prompts document covers_parent_criteria and
the new idle enforcement in the existing Coverage discipline.
TaskService.{parent_ac_coverage,unclaimed_parent_acceptance_criteria} added
beside uncovered_parent_acceptance_criteria; all three refactored onto a
shared _parent_ac_ref_sets helper (keeps each under the xenon B ceiling,
preserves the committed roll-up behavior). Verb tables regenerated for the
new delegate param — the regen also syncs pre-existing table drift that was
never regenerated after earlier merges (read_messages, pass_review
ac_verdicts, board pitch). Two brand-new generated tables (prompter,
secretary) are left untracked pending a separate decision.
|
||
|
|
3205443119 |
Fix: dependency spawn gate and cell ownership (#73)
* Cleanup + Missing greenlet error * fix(messaging): persist a group's active-session pointer so posts reuse it create_session and create_session_with_access_check set group.active_session_id from session.id BEFORE the flush that materializes it — the id is a flush-time uuid4 default, so the pointer was written as NULL and every post opened a fresh session, fragmenting one conversation across many. Flush first, then link, the same ordering the seed path already uses. Two tests fabricated "two distinct sessions" by calling create_session twice on one group, which only differed because of this bug; switch them to two groups so they keep testing their real intent. Add a regression guard that the pointer is actually persisted and a second create reuses the live session. * fix(orchestrator): gate spawns on dependencies and keep cell tasks in their cell The cross-task dependency check ran only on the dev dispatch path, so cell-PM, Main-PM and board agents were spawned onto dependency-blocked tasks and flailed unblock / escalate / notify against an unfinished upstream — climbing ownership of cell work up to the board, which cannot drive it, and deadlocking the task. - Move the dependency gate into the shared spawn readiness check so it covers every role, and auto-block the task so it leaves the pending pool until the upstream reaches a terminal state (then the existing auto-unblock revives it). - Cell-ownership invariant: a backend/frontend/ux_ui task may only be worked or owned by its own cell. The readiness gate refuses a board or Main-PM spawn onto a cell task; reassign refuses and clears such an owner; and on dependency-clear a mis-owned cell task is re-homed to its cell's pending pool instead of reviving under an owner that cannot progress it. - A dependency block is never a CEO signal: notify(target=ceo) is refused while the task is waiting on an unfinished upstream, with a remediate to idle and wait — the block clears on its own. * Uploading images + Fixing pyproject.toml * ++ * revert(orchestrator): drop the cell-ownership block pending a tooling audit The cell-ownership invariant added earlier — a board / Main-PM role may never be spawned onto or reassigned to a cell task, plus re-homing a mis-owned cell task on dependency-clear — was too absolute. It forbids a higher role from stepping in when something genuinely deeper is going on, and contradicts the existing rule that main_pm may hold a task at awaiting_pm_review. The dependency spawn gate already prevents the cascade that handed the board cell tasks; the deadlock it guarded against will be addressed with a return-path approach after auditing what tools the cell PMs actually need. Keeps the dependency gate and the CEO dependency-block notify guard. * docs(prompts): a dependency wait is wait-and-idle, not escalate The cell-PM and Main-PM prompts told agents to escalate_up / retry unblock on a blocked task without distinguishing a dependency wait (which auto-clears the moment the upstream completes) from a real wedge — the source of the escalate/unblock flail and the CEO-notification spam. Split the blocked-state guidance: a cross-cell dependency wait = note + i_am_idle (do not escalate, unblock, or notify the CEO); escalate only a genuinely broken upstream. Fix two stale references to i_am_blocked, a developer-only verb the PMs do not have, to escalate_up. Correct the CLAUDE.md verb-surface table, which understated every role: it listed 4 cell_pm verbs while the flow manifest derives the full set (11, including unclaim and i_am_idle) from lifecycle.spec.intents_for_role. * feat(gateway): cell_pm reassign verb — intra-cell developer hand-off A cell PM can now hand a claimed/in_progress task to another developer in its own cell without unclaim (which drops the work back to the pool and loses the assignee). The branch is keyed to the task, so the work-in-progress is preserved; the new dev is respawned to continue. Intra-cell only: the task must be in the caller's cell and new_assignee must be a developer of that same cell. Wired through every layer: the reassign IntentSpec (composes=(), cell_pm-only), the choreographer verb + intra-cell guard, a reaper-safe TaskService.reassign_active_claim (reseeds the claim heartbeat so the new dev is not immediately reaped), the ReassignRequest schema, the cell_pm flow route, and the MCP flow-server tool. Tracing-waived like unclaim (mechanical hand-off). Regenerated lifecycle/verb artifacts; prompt + CLAUDE.md updated. --------- Co-authored-by: Renn F <rennf93@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Renn F
|
073c2ec8b5 |
fix(prompts): repair the verb-table generator and regenerate
regenerate_verb_tables.py imported roboco.api.schemas.v2, which no longer exists (schemas moved to v1), so it raised on import and the generated verb/tool tables could never be refreshed — leaving _generated/verbs.md and the per-role prompts stale (e.g. listing submit_for_qa, omitting the notify_*/channels/progress/pr_update content tools). Repoint the imports to v1, fix the renamed schema (OpenPrRequest), and regenerate. |
||
|
Renn F
|
6806516015 |
refactor(gateway): rename submit_for_qa to open_pr; pin atomic preconditions
Pre-fix, submit_for_qa opened a PR (side effect) and returned OK with next='call i_am_done' — agents read the verb name, assumed they were done with QA handoff, never called i_am_done, and PRs ended up orphaned (PR #12 in the 2026-05-08 trace). Two changes: 1. Rename submit_for_qa -> open_pr so the verb name matches the semantic. The PR opens here; the actual QA handoff happens at i_am_done. Renamed across: - choreographer/_impl.py (method) - mcp/flow_server.py (tool registration + _TOOLS dict) - api/routes/v2/flow_dev.py (route + handler) - api/schemas/v2/flow.py (OpenPrRequest) - services/gateway/verb_gates.py (_STATE_VERBS) - services/gateway/role_config.py (developer flow manifest) - services/gateway/content_actions.py (commit-success next= hint) - agent_sdk/server.py (post-tool guidance map) - runtime/orchestrator.py (developer prompt) - agents/prompts/{base,roles/developer,_generated/*}.md - tests/unit/gateway/test_submit_for_qa.py -> test_open_pr.py - tests/unit/api/routes/v2/test_flow_dev.py - tests/unit/gateway/test_verb_gates.py - tests/unit/api/test_correlation_id.py - tests/unit/mcp_servers/test_flow_server.py - tests/integration/test_full_lifecycle_real_db.py 2. New regression test (test_open_pr_does_not_create_pr_if_no_commits) pins the atomic invariant: preconditions (assignee, commits, no-prior-PR) must be checked BEFORE git.create_pr/push_branch run. Any future re-ordering breaks the test. Tests: 3128 passing (3127 + 1 new), 100% coverage, ruff clean. Note: TaskService.submit_for_qa() (the v1-layer service method) is INTENTIONALLY not renamed — it's a different layer used by the v1 routes. The rename here is only the gateway verb surface. |
||
|
Renn F
|
4829f93a68 |
fix(gateway): unblock task claim; full Phase 0/1/2 remediation
Resolves the 100% claim-failure rate introduced by the gateway rewrite
(commit
|