refactor(gateway): rename submit_for_qa to open_pr; pin atomic preconditions

Pre-fix, submit_for_qa opened a PR (side effect) and returned OK with
next='call i_am_done' — agents read the verb name, assumed they were
done with QA handoff, never called i_am_done, and PRs ended up
orphaned (PR #12 in the 2026-05-08 trace).

Two changes:

1. Rename submit_for_qa -> open_pr so the verb name matches the
   semantic. The PR opens here; the actual QA handoff happens at
   i_am_done. Renamed across:
   - choreographer/_impl.py (method)
   - mcp/flow_server.py (tool registration + _TOOLS dict)
   - api/routes/v2/flow_dev.py (route + handler)
   - api/schemas/v2/flow.py (OpenPrRequest)
   - services/gateway/verb_gates.py (_STATE_VERBS)
   - services/gateway/role_config.py (developer flow manifest)
   - services/gateway/content_actions.py (commit-success next= hint)
   - agent_sdk/server.py (post-tool guidance map)
   - runtime/orchestrator.py (developer prompt)
   - agents/prompts/{base,roles/developer,_generated/*}.md
   - tests/unit/gateway/test_submit_for_qa.py -> test_open_pr.py
   - tests/unit/api/routes/v2/test_flow_dev.py
   - tests/unit/gateway/test_verb_gates.py
   - tests/unit/api/test_correlation_id.py
   - tests/unit/mcp_servers/test_flow_server.py
   - tests/integration/test_full_lifecycle_real_db.py

2. New regression test (test_open_pr_does_not_create_pr_if_no_commits)
   pins the atomic invariant: preconditions (assignee, commits,
   no-prior-PR) must be checked BEFORE git.create_pr/push_branch run.
   Any future re-ordering breaks the test.

Tests: 3128 passing (3127 + 1 new), 100% coverage, ruff clean.

Note: TaskService.submit_for_qa() (the v1-layer service method) is
INTENTIONALLY not renamed — it's a different layer used by the v1
routes. The rename here is only the gateway verb surface.
This commit is contained in:
Renn F
2026-05-08 11:54:31 +02:00
parent 2eeefb2ee1
commit 6806516015
20 changed files with 125 additions and 79 deletions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
|------|-------------|
| `give_me_work` | `give_me_work()` |
| `i_will_work_on` | `i_will_work_on(task_id: UUID, plan: str | None = None)` |
| `submit_for_qa` | `submit_for_qa(task_id: UUID)` |
| `open_pr` | `open_pr(task_id: UUID)` |
| `i_am_done` | `i_am_done(task_id: UUID, notes: str = '')` |
| `i_am_blocked` | `i_am_blocked(task_id: UUID, reason: str)` |
| `unclaim` | `unclaim(task_id: UUID)` |
+1 -1
View File
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ as the source of truth for verb signatures.
|------|-------------|
| `give_me_work` | `give_me_work()` |
| `i_will_work_on` | `i_will_work_on(task_id: UUID, plan: str | None = None)` |
| `submit_for_qa` | `submit_for_qa(task_id: UUID)` |
| `open_pr` | `open_pr(task_id: UUID)` |
| `i_am_done` | `i_am_done(task_id: UUID, notes: str = '')` |
| `i_am_blocked` | `i_am_blocked(task_id: UUID, reason: str)` |
| `unclaim` | `unclaim(task_id: UUID)` |
+1 -1
View File
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Read the `missing` array literally. Each entry below names what to do; the `reme
| `qa_notes>=min` | QA `notes` argument must be ≥80 chars; review the diff and write a substantive note. | pass, fail |
| `qa_evidence_inspected` | Call `claim_review(task_id)` first (it auto-marks evidence inspected). | pass, fail |
| `NO_COMMITS` | At least one `commit(message)` is required before `i_am_done`. | i_am_done |
| `NO_PR` | Call `submit_for_qa(task_id)` to push the branch and open the PR, then retry. | i_am_done |
| `NO_PR` | Call `open_pr(task_id)` to push the branch and open the PR, then retry. | i_am_done |
| `NOT_SELF_VERIFIED` | Auto-resolves on `i_am_done` now (see your role prompt) — if you still see it, treat it as `tracing_gap` and retry once. | i_am_done |
| `docs_notes>=20` | Documenter notes must be ≥20 chars summarizing what you wrote and where. | i_documented |
| `files` | Call `i_documented` with `files=['<path>', ...]` listing each doc file written. | i_documented |
+4 -4
View File
@@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ You write code; you do not coordinate. If you find yourself thinking "let me als
| `give_me_work()` | Returns your highest-priority task or `idle`. | None. |
| `i_will_work_on(task_id, plan=None)` | Claims a `pending`/`needs_revision` task; resumes a `claimed`/`in_progress` task you own. Auto-creates branch on first claim. | Task assigned to you (or unassigned and matches your role/team); for `claimed` resumption, plan and branch must exist. |
| `commit(message)` | Makes the git commit, auto-prefixes `[task-id]`, records a progress entry. This is the ONLY way to commit — the gateway covers the actual git operation. | Task in `in_progress`; on your branch. |
| `submit_for_qa(task_id)` | Push your branch and open a PR. Run after your last commit, before `i_am_done`. | Task assigned to you; at least one commit; no PR yet. |
| `i_am_done(task_id, notes)` | Submit for QA. Auto-runs in_progress→verifying→awaiting_qa. Requires PR already open — run `submit_for_qa` first. | At least one commit; PR open; progress entry; journal `reflect`; every acceptance criterion addressed. |
| `open_pr(task_id)` | Push your branch and open a PR. Run after your last commit, before `i_am_done`. | Task assigned to you; at least one commit; no PR yet. |
| `i_am_done(task_id, notes)` | Submit for QA. Auto-runs in_progress→verifying→awaiting_qa. Requires PR already open — run `open_pr` first. | At least one commit; PR open; progress entry; journal `reflect`; every acceptance criterion addressed. |
| `i_am_blocked(reason)` | Records the blocker, escalates to your PM, idles you. | Task is yours and active. |
| `unclaim(task_id)` | Release this claim back to pending. Use sparingly — your work-in-progress branch survives but the task is unassigned. | Task assigned to you and in claimed/in_progress. |
| `resume(task_id)` | Resume a paused task. Transitions paused → in_progress. | Task assigned to you and in paused state. |
@@ -38,13 +38,13 @@ You write code; you do not coordinate. If you find yourself thinking "let me als
4. Edit / Write your changes inside the workspace. Run tests via `Bash` if needed.
5. `commit(message)` after each meaningful change. Repeat 4-5 until the criteria are met.
6. `note(scope='reflect', text="<what you did + why>")` before submitting.
7. `submit_for_qa(task_id="<your-task>")` -> pushes your branch and opens the PR up to your cell PM's branch. The response includes the PR number.
7. `open_pr(task_id="<your-task>")` -> pushes your branch and opens the PR up to your cell PM's branch. The response includes the PR number.
8. `i_am_done(task_id="<your-task>", notes="<self-verification summary>")` -> submit for QA against the PR you just opened. Auto-runs the in_progress→verifying→awaiting_qa transitions. Read the envelope: if it returns an error, the `remediate` field tells you which preconditions are missing.
9. After `i_am_done` succeeds you are finished with this task. `i_am_idle()`. Documenter writes docs; PM merges. You will only be respawned on `needs_revision`.
## Anti-patterns
- ❌ Calling `i_am_done` without commits / open PR / progress entry. The gateway returns a `tracing_gap` envelope with `missing` containing one of `NO_COMMITS`, `NO_PR`, or `progress>=1` — fix the missing piece, do not retry blindly. For `NO_PR`, call `submit_for_qa(task_id)` to push and open the PR, then retry `i_am_done`.
- ❌ Calling `i_am_done` without commits / open PR / progress entry. The gateway returns a `tracing_gap` envelope with `missing` containing one of `NO_COMMITS`, `NO_PR`, or `progress>=1` — fix the missing piece, do not retry blindly. For `NO_PR`, call `open_pr(task_id)` to push and open the PR, then retry `i_am_done`.
- ❌ Editing files outside your assigned task's branch. Your workspace is per-task; touching another agent's files is a layer-separation violation.
- ❌ Trying to merge your own PR. Merging is a PM verb — you have no merge tool. If you call `Bash gh pr merge`, the orchestrator denies it.
- ❌ Running `Bash git commit` or `Bash git push`. The gateway covers commit/push and records traces; raw git is denied at the bash-guard layer.
+11 -10
View File
@@ -426,22 +426,23 @@ TRACEABILITY_REMINDERS: dict[str, tuple[str, str]] = {
"journal",
"Document cancellation reason with roboco_journal_entry()",
),
# === GIT TOOLS ===
"roboco_git_commit": (
# === GIT / WRITE TOOLS ===
# Devs/Documenters write code via the roboco-do `commit` verb;
# the choreographer auto-pushes and opens/merges PRs as part of the
# lifecycle transitions. There is no separate roboco_git_commit /
# _push / _create_pr / _merge_pr tool — keys below match what the
# SDK actually receives.
"commit": (
"journal",
"Significant change? Capture insights with roboco_journal_learning()",
),
"roboco_git_push": (
"verify",
"Ensure commits describe changes clearly",
),
"roboco_git_create_pr": (
"open_pr": (
"reflect",
"Reflect on all changes with roboco_journal_reflect()",
"PR opens here — reflect on the change with roboco_journal_reflect()",
),
"roboco_git_merge_pr": (
"complete": (
"verify",
"Verify all CI checks pass before merging",
"Verify all CI checks pass and QA + docs signed off before merging",
),
# === A2A TOOLS ===
"roboco_agent_request": (
+5 -5
View File
@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ from roboco.api.schemas.v2.flow import (
IAmDoneRequest,
IAmIdleRequest,
IWillWorkOnRequest,
OpenPrRequest,
ResumeRequest,
SubmitForQaRequest,
UnclaimRequest,
)
from roboco.services.gateway.choreographer import Choreographer
@@ -52,14 +52,14 @@ async def i_will_work_on(
return envelope_to_response(env, request)
@router.post("/submit_for_qa")
async def submit_for_qa(
@router.post("/open_pr")
async def open_pr(
request: Request,
body: SubmitForQaRequest,
body: OpenPrRequest,
x_agent_id: _AgentIdHeader,
choreographer: _ChoreographerDep,
) -> dict:
env = await choreographer.submit_for_qa(x_agent_id, body.task_id)
env = await choreographer.open_pr(x_agent_id, body.task_id)
return envelope_to_response(env, request)
+1 -1
View File
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ class IWillWorkOnRequest(BaseModel):
plan: str | None = None
class SubmitForQaRequest(BaseModel):
class OpenPrRequest(BaseModel):
task_id: UUID
+12 -5
View File
@@ -118,13 +118,20 @@ def i_will_work_on(task_id: str, plan: str | None = None) -> dict[str, Any]:
return _post(_role_path("i_will_work_on"), {"task_id": task_id, "plan": plan})
def submit_for_qa(task_id: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
"""Push your branch and open a PR. Run after your last commit, before i_am_done."""
return _post(_role_path("submit_for_qa"), {"task_id": task_id})
def open_pr(task_id: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
"""Push your branch and open a PR.
Atomic: validates ALL preconditions (assignee, commits, no-prior-PR)
BEFORE running any git side effects. After this verb returns success,
call ``i_am_done(task_id, notes='...')`` to actually submit for QA.
Renamed from ``submit_for_qa`` (2026-05-08) the old name suggested
this verb advanced the lifecycle, but it only opens the PR.
"""
return _post(_role_path("open_pr"), {"task_id": task_id})
def i_am_done(task_id: str, notes: str = "") -> dict[str, Any]:
"""Submit for QA. Strict — PR must be open (call submit_for_qa first)."""
"""Submit for QA. Strict — PR must be open (call open_pr first)."""
return _post(_role_path("i_am_done"), {"task_id": task_id, "notes": notes})
@@ -264,7 +271,7 @@ _TOOLS: dict[str, Any] = {
# dev
"give_me_work": give_me_work,
"i_will_work_on": i_will_work_on,
"submit_for_qa": submit_for_qa,
"open_pr": open_pr,
"i_am_done": i_am_done,
"i_am_blocked": i_am_blocked,
"unclaim": unclaim,
+2 -2
View File
@@ -2359,7 +2359,7 @@ class AgentOrchestrator:
"""True if a `claimed` task is actually in the doc/PR parallel phase.
The `original_developer:` quick_context marker is set pre-QA by
`submit_for_qa`, so it alone cannot distinguish a QA-claimed
`open_pr`, so it alone cannot distinguish a QA-claimed
awaiting_qa task (wrong) from a doc-claimed awaiting_documentation
task (right). Require the claimant to be a documenter.
"""
@@ -5163,7 +5163,7 @@ Continue development. Required gates before i_am_done() will succeed
as you make trade-offs.
When acceptance criteria are met, call
submit_for_qa(task_id="...") to push your branch and open the PR,
open_pr(task_id="...") to push your branch and open the PR,
then i_am_done(task_id="...", notes="<self-verification summary>")
to submit for QA review.
+20 -17
View File
@@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ class Choreographer:
task_id=str(task_id),
next=(
"edit + commit(message) for each meaningful change,"
" then submit_for_qa(task_id) and i_am_done(task_id)"
" then open_pr(task_id) and i_am_done(task_id)"
),
context_briefing=briefing,
).with_introspection(task=t, role=role)
@@ -537,19 +537,22 @@ class Choreographer:
env.context_briefing = briefing
return env
async def submit_for_qa(self, agent_id: UUID, task_id: UUID) -> Envelope:
"""Push the dev's branch and open a PR. Does NOT submit for QA itself —
the dev calls ``i_am_done`` after this verb returns success.
async def open_pr(self, agent_id: UUID, task_id: UUID) -> Envelope:
"""Push the dev's branch and open a PR.
Gate E made ``i_am_done`` strict: it requires ``pr_number`` set. The
catch-up shortcut lives off the dev manifest, so before this verb
existed devs had no escape from the NO_PR rejection. ``submit_for_qa``
is the explicit push + open-PR step, leaving ``i_am_done`` to do the
strict submit.
Atomic: validates ALL preconditions (assignee, commits,
no-prior-PR) BEFORE running any git side effects. If any check
fails, no PR is opened. After success, the dev calls
``i_am_done`` to actually transition the task to awaiting_qa.
Pre-flight: caller must own the task, have committed at least once,
and not already have a PR open. If a PR is already open, this verb
is idempotent it points the dev at ``i_am_done``.
Renamed from ``submit_for_qa`` (2026-05-08): the old name
suggested this verb advanced the lifecycle, but it only opens
the PR. Agents misread the name, called it expecting a QA
handoff, then never called i_am_done orphaning PRs (e.g.
PR #12 in the smoke-test trace).
Idempotent on re-call: if a PR is already open, returns OK
pointing the dev at ``i_am_done`` without opening another.
"""
t = await self.task.get(task_id)
if t is None:
@@ -557,7 +560,7 @@ class Choreographer:
Envelope.not_found(message=f"task {task_id} not found"),
agent_id=agent_id,
task_id=task_id,
verb="submit_for_qa",
verb="open_pr",
)
briefing = await self._briefing_for(agent_id, task_id)
agent = await self.task.agent_for(agent_id)
@@ -571,7 +574,7 @@ class Choreographer:
).with_introspection(task=t, role=role),
agent_id=agent_id,
task_id=task_id,
verb="submit_for_qa",
verb="open_pr",
)
if not t.commits:
return await self._emit_rejection(
@@ -585,7 +588,7 @@ class Choreographer:
).with_introspection(task=t, role=role),
agent_id=agent_id,
task_id=task_id,
verb="submit_for_qa",
verb="open_pr",
)
if t.pr_number is not None:
return Envelope.ok(
@@ -620,7 +623,7 @@ class Choreographer:
- tracing: progress entry, journal:reflect, acceptance criteria
- field-level: at least one commit, PR open
The dev must have called ``commit()`` (do_server) at least once and
``submit_for_qa(task_id)`` to push + open the PR. Calling i_am_done
``open_pr(task_id)`` to push + open the PR. Calling i_am_done
is the dev's explicit attestation that the work is complete; it
auto-runs the in_progress verifying transition (which seeds
``self_verified``) and then verifying awaiting_qa.
@@ -723,7 +726,7 @@ class Choreographer:
if t.pr_number is None:
missing.append("NO_PR")
hints.append(
"no PR open — call submit_for_qa(task_id) to push your"
"no PR open — call open_pr(task_id) to push your"
" branch and open the PR, then retry i_am_done"
)
if not missing:
+1 -1
View File
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ class ContentActions:
return Envelope.ok(
status=str(t.status),
task_id=str(t.id),
next="continue committing, or submit_for_qa when ready",
next="continue committing, or open_pr when ready",
context_briefing={},
)
+1 -1
View File
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ class RoleConfig:
_DEV_FLOW = (
"give_me_work",
"i_will_work_on",
"submit_for_qa",
"open_pr",
"i_am_done",
"i_am_blocked",
"unclaim",
+3 -3
View File
@@ -42,21 +42,21 @@ _STATE_VERBS: dict[tuple[str, str], tuple[str, ...]] = {
("developer", "needs_revision"): ("i_will_work_on", "unclaim"),
("developer", "claimed"): (
"commit",
"submit_for_qa",
"open_pr",
"i_am_done",
"i_am_blocked",
"unclaim",
),
("developer", "in_progress"): (
"commit",
"submit_for_qa",
"open_pr",
"i_am_done",
"i_am_blocked",
"unclaim",
),
("developer", "verifying"): (
"commit",
"submit_for_qa",
"open_pr",
"i_am_done",
"i_am_blocked",
),
@@ -322,10 +322,10 @@ async def test_dev_can_claim_pending_task_via_gateway(
async def test_dev_full_chain_through_awaiting_qa(
db_session: AsyncSession, lifecycle_setup: dict[str, Any]
) -> None:
"""claim → commit → submit_for_qa → i_am_done lands in awaiting_qa.
"""claim → commit → open_pr → i_am_done lands in awaiting_qa.
Drives the full developer-side closure path. Verifies:
- submit_for_qa records pr_number on the task (commits + PR pre-flight)
- open_pr records pr_number on the task (commits + PR pre-flight)
- i_am_done auto-runs submit_verification (P1-3) verifying awaiting_qa
- Heartbeat refreshes after each verb (`_touch`)
- active_claimant_id remains set through dev's tenure
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ async def test_dev_full_chain_through_awaiting_qa(
# 2. Commit (via stub git directly + record progress on task — the gateway
# path through ContentActions.commit calls task.add_progress, which we
# simulate here so submit_for_qa's commits-precondition is satisfied).
# simulate here so open_pr's commits-precondition is satisfied).
await stub_git.commit(
branch_name=_BRANCH,
message=f"[{str(task.id)[:8]}] feat(api): add /healthz",
@@ -361,9 +361,9 @@ async def test_dev_full_chain_through_awaiting_qa(
)
await task_service.add_progress(task.id, dev_agent.id, "implemented /healthz")
# 3. submit_for_qa — push + open PR. After this, task.pr_number is set.
env = await c.submit_for_qa(dev_agent.id, task.id)
assert env.error is None, f"submit_for_qa failed: {env.message}"
# 3. open_pr — push + open PR. After this, task.pr_number is set.
env = await c.open_pr(dev_agent.id, task.id)
assert env.error is None, f"open_pr failed: {env.message}"
refreshed = await task_service.get(task.id)
assert refreshed is not None
assert refreshed.pr_number == _PR_NUMBER, "P0-7 / S-02: PR recorded on task"
@@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ async def test_full_chain_through_doc_handoff(
task_id=task.id,
)
await task_service.add_progress(task.id, dev_agent.id, "implemented /healthz")
await c.submit_for_qa(dev_agent.id, task.id)
await c.open_pr(dev_agent.id, task.id)
env = await c.i_am_done(dev_agent.id, task.id, "tests pass; route works")
assert env.error is None
assert env.status == "awaiting_qa"
+5 -5
View File
@@ -157,20 +157,20 @@ def test_i_am_blocked_rejects_empty_reason() -> None:
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_submit_for_qa_dispatches_task_id() -> None:
"""POST submit_for_qa forwards task_id."""
async def test_open_pr_dispatches_task_id() -> None:
"""POST open_pr forwards task_id."""
mock_chore = MagicMock()
mock_chore.submit_for_qa = AsyncMock(
mock_chore.open_pr = AsyncMock(
return_value=_make_envelope(status="awaiting_qa", task_id=_TASK_ID)
)
client = TestClient(_build_app(mock_chore))
resp = client.post(
"/api/v2/flow/developer/submit_for_qa",
"/api/v2/flow/developer/open_pr",
json={"task_id": _TASK_ID},
headers=_HEADERS,
)
assert resp.status_code == _HTTP_200
mock_chore.submit_for_qa.assert_awaited_once()
mock_chore.open_pr.assert_awaited_once()
@pytest.mark.asyncio
+1 -1
View File
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ def _reload_mcp_module(monkeypatch: pytest.MonkeyPatch, dotted: str) -> ModuleTy
"flow_tools": [
"give_me_work",
"i_will_work_on",
"submit_for_qa",
"open_pr",
"i_am_done",
"i_am_blocked",
"unclaim",
@@ -1049,3 +1049,38 @@ async def test_i_will_work_on_envelope_carries_introspection_on_rejection() -> N
assert isinstance(body["valid_next_verbs"], list)
# Lifecycle verbs are NOT in the list for a completed task.
assert "i_will_work_on" not in body["valid_next_verbs"]
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_open_pr_does_not_create_pr_if_no_commits() -> None:
"""Atomic invariant: if commits[] is empty, open_pr must NOT call
git.create_pr. Pre-fix this was already true at the verb level, but
this test pins it as a regression: any future refactor that
re-orders precondition vs side effect breaks the test."""
dev_id = uuid4()
task_id = uuid4()
task = MagicMock(
status="in_progress",
assigned_to=dev_id,
commits=[],
pr_number=None,
branch_name="feature/backend/abc",
id=task_id,
title="t",
team="backend",
task_type="code",
)
task_svc = AsyncMock()
task_svc.get.return_value = task
task_svc.agent_for.return_value = MagicMock(role="developer", team="backend")
git_svc = AsyncMock()
git_svc.create_pr = AsyncMock()
git_svc.push_branch = AsyncMock()
deps = _make_deps(task=task_svc, git=git_svc)
c = Choreographer(deps)
env = await c.open_pr(dev_id, task_id)
body = env.as_dict()
assert body["error"] == "invalid_state"
assert "no commits" in body["message"]
git_svc.create_pr.assert_not_called()
git_svc.push_branch.assert_not_called()
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
"""submit_for_qa pushes the current branch and opens a PR.
"""open_pr pushes the current branch and opens a PR.
Gate E (commit c5c2016) made `i_am_done` strict requires `pr_number` set.
The catch-up flow is off the dev manifest. Devs need an explicit verb that
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ def _make_deps(**overrides: AsyncMock) -> ChoreographerDeps:
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_submit_for_qa_pushes_and_opens_pr() -> None:
async def test_open_pr_pushes_and_opens_pr() -> None:
aid = uuid4()
tid = uuid4()
t = MagicMock(
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ async def test_submit_for_qa_pushes_and_opens_pr() -> None:
deps = _make_deps(task=task_svc, git=git_svc, work_session=work_session_svc)
c = Choreographer(deps)
env = await c.submit_for_qa(aid, tid)
env = await c.open_pr(aid, tid)
git_svc.push_branch.assert_awaited()
git_svc.create_pr.assert_awaited()
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ async def test_submit_for_qa_pushes_and_opens_pr() -> None:
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_submit_for_qa_rejects_when_not_assigned() -> None:
async def test_open_pr_rejects_when_not_assigned() -> None:
aid = uuid4()
other = uuid4()
tid = uuid4()
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ async def test_submit_for_qa_rejects_when_not_assigned() -> None:
deps = _make_deps(task=task_svc, git=git_svc)
c = Choreographer(deps)
env = await c.submit_for_qa(aid, tid)
env = await c.open_pr(aid, tid)
git_svc.push_branch.assert_not_awaited()
git_svc.create_pr.assert_not_awaited()
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ async def test_submit_for_qa_rejects_when_not_assigned() -> None:
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_submit_for_qa_rejects_when_no_commits() -> None:
async def test_open_pr_rejects_when_no_commits() -> None:
aid = uuid4()
tid = uuid4()
t = MagicMock(
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ async def test_submit_for_qa_rejects_when_no_commits() -> None:
deps = _make_deps(task=task_svc, git=git_svc)
c = Choreographer(deps)
env = await c.submit_for_qa(aid, tid)
env = await c.open_pr(aid, tid)
git_svc.push_branch.assert_not_awaited()
git_svc.create_pr.assert_not_awaited()
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ async def test_submit_for_qa_rejects_when_no_commits() -> None:
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_submit_for_qa_idempotent_when_pr_already_open() -> None:
async def test_open_pr_idempotent_when_pr_already_open() -> None:
aid = uuid4()
tid = uuid4()
t = MagicMock(
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ async def test_submit_for_qa_idempotent_when_pr_already_open() -> None:
deps = _make_deps(task=task_svc, git=git_svc)
c = Choreographer(deps)
env = await c.submit_for_qa(aid, tid)
env = await c.open_pr(aid, tid)
git_svc.push_branch.assert_not_awaited()
git_svc.create_pr.assert_not_awaited()
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ async def test_submit_for_qa_idempotent_when_pr_already_open() -> None:
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_submit_for_qa_returns_not_found_for_unknown_task() -> None:
async def test_open_pr_returns_not_found_for_unknown_task() -> None:
aid = uuid4()
tid = uuid4()
task_svc = AsyncMock()
@@ -170,6 +170,6 @@ async def test_submit_for_qa_returns_not_found_for_unknown_task() -> None:
deps = _make_deps(task=task_svc)
c = Choreographer(deps)
env = await c.submit_for_qa(aid, tid)
env = await c.open_pr(aid, tid)
assert env.error == "not_found"
+2 -2
View File
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ def test_developer_pending_task_can_claim() -> None:
def test_developer_in_progress_task_can_commit_and_finish() -> None:
verbs = valid_next_verbs("developer", _task("in_progress"))
assert "commit" in verbs
assert "submit_for_qa" in verbs
assert "open_pr" in verbs
assert "i_am_done" in verbs
assert "i_am_blocked" in verbs
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ def test_completed_task_offers_no_lifecycle_verbs() -> None:
# Idle / observation verbs may still be offered; lifecycle verbs aren't.
assert "i_will_work_on" not in verbs
assert "commit" not in verbs
assert "submit_for_qa" not in verbs
assert "open_pr" not in verbs
def test_unknown_role_returns_empty_list() -> None:
+1 -1
View File
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ _FULL_MANIFEST = {
"flow_tools": [
"give_me_work",
"i_will_work_on",
"submit_for_qa",
"open_pr",
"i_am_done",
"i_am_blocked",
"unclaim",