*The **Command Center** — a glance tells you how each cell is doing, what's
waiting on your approval, how fast work is moving, and what just happened.*
---
## The shape of the company
Work in RoboCo is always a **task**, and tasks nest into a tree that mirrors the
org itself:
```
CEO (you, the human)
└── Board ── Product Owner · Head of Marketing · Auditor (silent)
In practice, one feature becomes a small tree of work — a parent task at the top,
a branch for each cell underneath, every node carrying its own status, git
branch, and pull request:
*A feature in motion. The parent task fans out to the UX/UI, Frontend, and
Backend cells, and each child moves through its own lifecycle — in progress,
awaiting review, completed — on its own branch.*
---
## Following a task through the company
### 1 · It starts with you
You describe what you want — a feature, a fix, an entire product — and hand it to
the **Board**. Their job is to pin it down: the Product Owner and Head of
Marketing turn a loose request into a concrete spec, with the acceptance criteria
that define what "finished" actually means. The Auditor watches the whole time
*Two seats at the table. The Product Owner and the Head of Marketing review the
same task from their own angles and put their reasoning on the record — this is
the Board building the actual spec for the Prompter, the feature this whole
*The notification itself, spelled out: the Board has finished, the task is
recorded, and nothing happens until you say so — Approve & Start hands it to the
Main PM; reject it and it goes back. This is the first of the only two moments
*QA earning its seat. On this Prompter task it read the work, marked it
**failed**, and sent it back — the developer's notes and the QA verdict sit side
by side on the record, with the Auditor watching the whole exchange. Real review,
not a rubber stamp; the gate only opens when the work is right.*
*Three streams becoming one history. Each cell's work lands as its own
**verified** commit, co-authored by the agent that wrote it — the UX/UI design,
the backend endpoint, the frontend page — folded together into the single pull
*The hand-off back to you. The integrated PR is open, every cell has delivered,
QA is green — and it waits. Nothing reaches `master` without your word.*
*And it is a real pull request, on the real repository — not a simulation. The
company's work shows up exactly where any engineer would look for it.*
*Open it and the whole brief is there — the objective, what was built, the
board-led split across the three cells, and the company's own notes — written by
RoboCo, for you to read before you decide.*
*The real diff, laid out for you to inspect — the migrations, the endpoints, the
panel components. This is the substance you are signing off on.*
*Your two words. **Approve & Merge** and it ships to `master`; **Request Changes**
and it goes around for another lap. The last call has the same shape as the first
You handed the company a task; it scoped it, built it, failed and re-ran its own
QA, documented it, and brought it back as a single pull request for your
sign-off. That's one complete pass.
*The whole tree in its final state — the parent waiting on your approval, every
cell's task done beneath it. One feature, start to finish, with you at only the
two ends.*
And the feature in these screenshots is the proof. The **Prompter** wasn't built
for a demo — it's a real page RoboCo's agents shipped to RoboCo's own control
panel. A company building its own product, in front of you, is the whole point of
RoboCo. What makes that hold together isn't a clever model or a lucky run; it's
the **organization** — the roles, the gated lifecycle, the reviews and the
sign-offs that keep eighteen agents moving as a company instead of a crowd. Run
as many of these passes as you like, across as many projects as you like.
