mirror of
https://github.com/N1-AI/claude-hidden-toolkit.git
synced 2026-06-23 11:39:56 +02:00
9 new tool cards (29–37): iOS Reminders CRUD suite (5 tools), visualize:show_widget, gmail_create_draft, anthropic_api_in_artifacts, persistent_storage. 13 v1.3 corrections including user_time/location reclassified as always-loaded, memory_user_edits 500-char limit, chart_display_v0 intermittent (not deterministic), window.storage session-scoped. New sections: MCP connector state, artifact execution layer, Project context behavior. iOS split from Android as distinct platform. Contributors: anonymous security researcher, DMontgomery40. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
60 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown
60 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown
# AGENTS.md — Context for AI Coding Agents
|
|
|
|
## What This Repo Is
|
|
|
|
A technical book ("Claude's Hidden Toolkit") documenting 37 undocumented internal tools in Claude.ai's consumer interfaces. Fully reverse-engineered through systematic testing across browser, desktop app, Android, and iOS.
|
|
|
|
## File Roles
|
|
|
|
| File | Role | Editable? |
|
|
|------|------|-----------|
|
|
| `Claude_Hidden_Toolkit.md` | Source of truth | Yes — all content changes here |
|
|
| `README.md` | GitHub landing page | Yes |
|
|
| `LICENSE` | CC BY 4.0 | No |
|
|
|
|
## Domain Knowledge
|
|
|
|
- **37 tools** documented with confirmed JSON schemas
|
|
- **4 platforms** with different tool inventories:
|
|
- Browser: 21 always-loaded, `tool_search` conditionally available with MCP connectors
|
|
- Desktop: 22 always-loaded + 32 MCP tools via `tool_search`
|
|
- Android: 22 always-loaded + 11 deferred consumer tools
|
|
- iOS: 22 always-loaded + 16 deferred consumer tools (Android set + 5 Reminders)
|
|
- **MCP connector state** affects tool inventory — connecting Gmail/Calendar adds tools to always-loaded pool
|
|
- **Tool cards** in the Technical Annex follow a strict template (see Appendix C in the book)
|
|
- **Figures** are numbered sequentially — all currently marked [Upcoming] pending screenshot capture
|
|
- **Response formats** are all empirically confirmed — no inferred markers remain
|
|
- **Two external contributors** credited: an anonymous security researcher (11 findings) and DMontgomery40 (iOS Reminders suite)
|
|
|
|
## Conventions
|
|
|
|
- Tool names in backticks: `web_search`, `event_create_v0`
|
|
- Platform tags on every claim: "Mobile App only", "Browser + Desktop only", "iOS only", "All"
|
|
- Version suffixes: `_v0` (initial/experimental), `_v1` (breaking upgrade)
|
|
- MCP connector tools use `Provider:tool_name` prefix on browser (e.g., "Google Calendar:gcal_list_calendars")
|
|
- Confirmed vs unverified clearly marked — never speculate
|
|
- Anonymous contributor referenced only as "An independent security researcher who prefers to remain anonymous" — never use real name
|
|
|
|
## Architecture Context
|
|
|
|
The book documents a multi-tier tool system:
|
|
- **Always-loaded tools**: injected into every conversation context (~21-22 depending on platform)
|
|
- **Deferred tools**: discovered at runtime via `tool_search` (mobile only, 11-16 consumer tools depending on OS)
|
|
- **MCP tools**: discovered via `tool_search` on desktop (32 integration tools) or conditionally on browser
|
|
- **MCP connector tools**: appear in always-loaded pool when connectors (Gmail, Calendar) are active
|
|
- **Artifact execution layer**: `anthropic_api_in_artifacts` (Claude-in-Claude), `persistent_storage` (session-scoped), MCP endpoint access from React artifacts — desktop/browser only, not mobile
|
|
|
|
The calendar system has a dual-layer architecture where Projects use MCP Connector tools with email-based IDs, while standard mobile chats use deferred consumer tools with numeric string IDs. The two layers are incompatible.
|
|
|
|
`visualize:show_widget` and `chart_display_v0` are mutually exclusive by surface: `chart_display_v0` is mobile only (deferred, intermittent instability), `show_widget` is desktop/browser only.
|
|
|
|
## Quality Gates
|
|
|
|
Before any content change:
|
|
1. Has the claim been tested on the relevant platform(s)?
|
|
2. Is the platform availability clearly stated?
|
|
3. Does the tool card follow the template structure?
|
|
4. Are figure numbers sequential with no gaps?
|
|
5. Is the response format marked as confirmed or unverified?
|
|
6. For contributor content: has it been independently verified before documenting as confirmed?
|