SuperClaude/SECURITY.md
Mithun Gowda B fdfb05e981
Version bump (#394)
* The -i flag has been removed from the `_run_command_cross_platform` function in `setup/components/mcp.py`.

* fix: Prevent installer from hanging during MCP installation

The SuperClaude installer was hanging during the installation of MCP components on non-Windows systems. This was caused by the use of an interactive shell (`-i`) when executing the `claude mcp add` command. The interactive shell would attempt to read from standard input, causing the process to be suspended by the shell.

This commit fixes the issue by removing the `-i` flag from the `_run_command_cross_platform` function in `setup/components/mcp.py`. This ensures that the installation process runs non-interactively and completes without hanging.

* fix: Add 'cmd /c' for Windows and refactor shell execution

This commit resolves an issue with `npx` command execution on Windows by prepending `cmd /c` to the command. It also refactors the shell command execution for non-Windows systems to use the `executable` argument in `subprocess.run` for a cleaner and more robust implementation.

* fix: Add 'cmd /c' for Windows and refactor shell execution

This commit resolves an issue with `npx` command execution on Windows by prepending `cmd /c` to the command. It also refactors the shell command execution for non-Windows systems to use the `executable` argument in `subprocess.run` for a cleaner and more robust implementation.

* docs: Update Chrome DevTools MCP documentation

This commit updates the documentation for the Chrome DevTools MCP server to be more comprehensive and consistent with the existing documentation structure. The file `SuperClaude/MCP/MCP_Chrome-DevTools.md` has been updated with detailed information about the server's purpose, triggers, and usage examples.

* docs: Update documentation for Chrome DevTools MCP

This commit updates the main README.md and the MCP servers user guide to include information about the new Chrome DevTools MCP server. The documentation has been updated to reflect the new server count and provide details about the new server's functionality.

* chore: Bump version to 4.1.5

This commit updates the version number from 4.1.4 to 4.1.5 across the entire codebase.

This includes updates to:
- CHANGELOG.md
- Documentation files
- Configuration files (package.json, pyproject.toml)
- Source code fallbacks
- The main VERSION file

---------

Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-09-26 19:37:34 +05:30

32 KiB

Security Policy

🔒 Reporting Security Vulnerabilities

SuperClaude Framework prioritizes security through secure-by-design principles, comprehensive input validation, and responsible vulnerability management. We are committed to maintaining a secure development platform while enabling powerful AI-assisted workflows.

Security Commitment:

  • Timely response to security reports (48-72 hours)
  • Transparent communication about security issues
  • Regular security audits and dependency updates
  • Community-driven security improvement

Responsible Disclosure

Primary Contact: anton.knoery@gmail.com (monitored by maintainers)

Process:

  1. Report: Send detailed vulnerability report to anton.knoery@gmail.com
  2. Acknowledgment: We'll confirm receipt within 48 hours
  3. Investigation: Initial assessment within 72 hours
  4. Coordination: Work together on fix development and testing
  5. Disclosure: Coordinated public disclosure after fix deployment

Alternative Channels:

  • GitHub Security Advisories (for GitHub-hosted issues)
  • Direct contact to maintainers for critical vulnerabilities
  • Encrypted communication available upon request

Please Do:

  • Provide detailed technical description and reproduction steps
  • Allow reasonable time for investigation and fix development
  • Maintain confidentiality until coordinated disclosure

Please Don't:

  • Publicly disclose vulnerabilities before coordination
  • Test vulnerabilities on systems you don't own
  • Access or modify data beyond proof-of-concept demonstration

What to Include

Essential Information:

  • SuperClaude version: SuperClaude --version
  • Operating system and version
  • Python version: python3 --version
  • Claude Code version: claude --version
  • Vulnerability description and potential impact
  • Detailed reproduction steps with minimal test case
  • Proof-of-concept code or commands (if applicable)

Helpful Additional Details:

  • MCP server configurations involved (if applicable)
  • Network environment and proxy configurations
  • Custom behavioral modes or agent configurations
  • Log files or error messages (sanitized of personal data)
  • Screenshots or recordings of the vulnerability demonstration

Vulnerability Report Template:

**SuperClaude Version:** [version]
**Environment:** [OS, Python version, Claude Code version]

**Vulnerability Summary:**
[Brief description of the security issue]

**Impact Assessment:**
[Potential security impact and affected components]

**Reproduction Steps:**
1. [Step-by-step instructions]
2. [Include exact commands or configuration]
3. [Show expected vs actual behavior]

**Proof of Concept:**
[Minimal code or commands demonstrating the issue]

**Suggested Fix:**
[Optional: your thoughts on remediation approach]

Response Timeline

Response Timeline:

Initial Response: 48 hours

  • Acknowledge receipt of vulnerability report
  • Assign internal tracking identifier
  • Provide initial impact assessment

Investigation: 72 hours

  • Confirm vulnerability and assess severity
  • Identify affected versions and components
  • Begin fix development planning

Status Updates: Weekly

  • Regular progress updates during investigation
  • Timeline adjustments if complexity requires extension
  • Coordination on disclosure timeline

Fix Development: Severity-dependent

  • Critical: 7-14 days for patch development
  • High: 14-30 days for comprehensive fix
  • Medium: 30-60 days for thorough resolution
  • Low: Next regular release cycle

Disclosure Coordination:

  • Advance notice to reporter before public disclosure
  • Security advisory preparation and review
  • Coordinated release with fix deployment
  • Public acknowledgment of responsible disclosure

Emergency Response: For actively exploited vulnerabilities or critical security issues:

  • Immediate response within 12 hours
  • Emergency patch development and testing
  • Expedited disclosure process with community notification

🚨 Severity Levels

Critical (CVSS 9.0-10.0)

  • Examples: Remote code execution, arbitrary file system access, credential theft
  • Response: 12-hour acknowledgment, 7-day fix target
  • Impact: Complete system compromise or data breach potential

High (CVSS 7.0-8.9)

  • Examples: Privilege escalation, sensitive data exposure, authentication bypass
  • Response: 24-hour acknowledgment, 14-day fix target
  • Impact: Significant security control bypass or data access

Medium (CVSS 4.0-6.9)

  • Examples: Information disclosure, denial of service, configuration manipulation
  • Response: 48-hour acknowledgment, 30-day fix target
  • Impact: Limited security impact or specific attack scenarios

Low (CVSS 0.1-3.9)

  • Examples: Minor information leaks, rate limiting bypass, non-critical validation errors
  • Response: 72-hour acknowledgment, next release cycle
  • Impact: Minimal security impact requiring specific conditions

Severity Assessment Factors:

  • Attack Vector: Network accessible vs local access required
  • Attack Complexity: Simple vs complex exploitation requirements
  • Privileges Required: None vs authenticated access needed
  • User Interaction: Automatic vs user action required
  • Scope: Framework core vs specific component impact
  • Confidentiality/Integrity/Availability Impact: Complete vs partial vs none

Special Considerations:

  • MCP server vulnerabilities assessed based on worst-case configuration
  • Agent coordination issues evaluated for privilege escalation potential
  • Configuration file vulnerabilities considered for credential exposure risk

🔐 Supported Versions

Currently Supported Versions:

Version Security Support End of Support
4.1.x Full support TBD (current)
3.x.x ⚠️ Critical only June 2025
2.x.x No support December 2024
1.x.x No support June 2024

Support Policy:

  • Full Support: All security issues addressed with regular patches
  • Critical Only: Only critical vulnerabilities (CVSS 9.0+) receive patches
  • No Support: No security patches; users should upgrade immediately

Version Support Lifecycle:

  • Current Major: Full security support for entire lifecycle
  • Previous Major: Critical security support for 12 months after new major release
  • Legacy Versions: No support; upgrade required for security fixes

Security Update Distribution:

  • Critical patches: Immediate release with emergency notification
  • High severity: Coordinated release with regular update cycle
  • Medium/Low: Included in next scheduled release

Upgrade Recommendations:

  • Always use the latest stable version for best security posture
  • Subscribe to security notifications for timely update information
  • Test updates in development environment before production deployment
  • Review security advisories for impact assessment

Enterprise Support: For organizations requiring extended security support:

  • Contact maintainers for custom support arrangements
  • Consider contributing to development for priority handling
  • Implement additional security controls for unsupported versions

🛡️ Security Features

Framework Component Security (V4 Enhanced)

Input Validation & Sanitization:

  • Command parameter validation and type checking
  • File path sanitization and directory traversal prevention
  • Agent activation logic with controlled permissions
  • Configuration parsing with strict schema validation

Behavioral Mode Security:

  • Mode switching validation and access controls
  • Isolation between different behavioral contexts
  • Safe mode operation with restricted capabilities
  • Automatic fallback to secure defaults on errors

Agent Coordination Security:

  • Agent privilege separation and limited scope
  • Secure inter-agent communication protocols
  • Resource usage monitoring and limits
  • Fail-safe agent deactivation on security violations

Session Management:

  • Secure session persistence with data integrity validation
  • Memory isolation between different projects and users
  • Automatic session cleanup and resource deallocation
  • Encrypted storage for sensitive session data

Quality Gates:

  • Pre-execution security validation for all commands
  • Runtime monitoring for suspicious activity patterns
  • Post-execution verification and rollback capabilities
  • Automated security scanning for generated code

Dependency Management:

  • Regular dependency updates and vulnerability scanning
  • Minimal privilege principle for external library usage
  • Supply chain security validation for framework components
  • Isolated execution environments for external tool integration

File System Protection

Path Validation:

  • Absolute path requirement for all file operations
  • Directory traversal attack prevention (../ sequences blocked)
  • Symbolic link resolution with safety checks
  • Whitelist-based path validation for sensitive operations

File Access Controls:

  • User permission respect and validation
  • Read-only mode enforcement where appropriate
  • Temporary file cleanup and secure deletion
  • Configuration file integrity validation

Configuration Security:

  • ~/.claude directory permission validation (user-only access)
  • Configuration file schema validation and sanitization
  • Backup creation before configuration changes
  • Rollback capabilities for configuration corruption

Workspace Isolation:

  • Project-specific workspace boundaries
  • Prevent cross-project data leakage
  • Secure temporary file management within project scope
  • Automatic cleanup of generated artifacts

File Content Security:

  • Binary file detection and safe handling
  • Text encoding validation and normalization
  • Size limits for file operations to prevent resource exhaustion
  • Content scanning for potential security indicators

Backup and Recovery:

  • Automatic backup creation before destructive operations
  • Secure backup storage with integrity verification
  • Point-in-time recovery for configuration corruption
  • User data preservation during framework updates

MCP Server Security (6 Servers in V4)

MCP Server Communication:

  • Secure protocol validation for all MCP server connections
  • Request/response integrity verification
  • Connection timeout and retry limits to prevent resource exhaustion
  • Error handling that doesn't leak sensitive information

Server Configuration Security:

  • Configuration file validation and schema enforcement
  • Secure credential management for authenticated MCP servers
  • Server capability verification and permission boundaries
  • Isolation between different MCP server contexts

Individual Server Security:

Context7: Documentation lookup with request sanitization and rate limiting Sequential: Reasoning engine with controlled execution scope and resource limits Magic: UI generation with output validation and XSS prevention Playwright: Browser automation with sandboxed execution environment Morphllm: Code transformation with input validation and safety checks Serena: Memory management with secure data persistence and access controls

Network Security:

  • HTTPS enforcement for external MCP server connections
  • Certificate validation and pinning where applicable
  • Network timeout configuration to prevent hanging connections
  • Request rate limiting and abuse prevention

Data Protection:

  • No persistent storage of sensitive data in MCP communications
  • Memory cleanup after MCP server interactions
  • Audit logging for security-relevant MCP operations
  • Data minimization in server requests and responses

Failure Handling:

  • Graceful degradation when MCP servers are unavailable
  • Secure fallback to native capabilities without data loss
  • Error isolation to prevent MCP failures from affecting framework security
  • Monitoring for suspicious MCP server behavior patterns

Configuration Security

Configuration File Security:

  • ~/.claude directory with user-only permissions (700)
  • Configuration files with restricted access (600)
  • Schema validation for all configuration content
  • Atomic configuration updates to prevent corruption

Secrets Management:

  • No hardcoded secrets or API keys in framework code
  • Environment variable preference for sensitive configuration
  • Clear documentation about credential handling best practices
  • Automatic redaction of sensitive data from logs and error messages

API Key Handling:

  • User-managed API keys stored in secure system credential stores
  • No framework storage of Claude API credentials
  • Clear separation between framework configuration and user credentials
  • Guidance for secure credential rotation

MCP Server Credentials:

  • Individual MCP server authentication handled securely
  • No cross-server credential sharing
  • User control over MCP server authentication configuration
  • Clear documentation for secure MCP server setup

Configuration Validation:

  • JSON schema validation for all configuration files
  • Type checking and range validation for configuration values
  • Detection and rejection of malicious configuration attempts
  • Automatic configuration repair for common corruption scenarios

Default Security:

  • Secure-by-default configuration with minimal permissions
  • Explicit opt-in for potentially risky features
  • Regular review of default settings for security implications
  • Clear warnings for configuration changes that reduce security

🔧 Security Best Practices

For Users

Installation Security:

  • Download SuperClaude only from official sources (PyPI, npm, GitHub releases)
  • Verify package signatures and checksums when available
  • Use virtual environments to isolate dependencies
  • Keep Python, Node.js, and system packages updated

Configuration Security:

  • Use secure file permissions for ~/.claude directory (user-only access)
  • Store API credentials in system credential managers, not configuration files
  • Regularly review and audit MCP server configurations
  • Enable only needed MCP servers to minimize attack surface

Project Security:

  • Never run SuperClaude with elevated privileges unless absolutely necessary
  • Review generated code before execution, especially for external API calls
  • Use version control to track all SuperClaude-generated changes
  • Regularly backup project configurations and important data

Network Security:

  • Use HTTPS for all external MCP server connections
  • Be cautious when using MCP servers that access external APIs
  • Consider network firewalls for restrictive environments
  • Monitor network traffic for unexpected external connections

Data Privacy:

  • Be mindful of sensitive data in project files when using cloud-based MCP servers
  • Review MCP server privacy policies and data handling practices
  • Use local-only MCP servers for sensitive projects when possible
  • Regularly clean up temporary files and session data

Command Usage:

  • Use --dry-run flags to preview potentially destructive operations
  • Understand command scope and permissions before execution
  • Be cautious with commands that modify multiple files or system configurations
  • Verify command output and results before proceeding with dependent operations

For Developers

Secure Coding Standards:

  • Input validation for all user-provided data and configuration
  • Use parameterized queries and prepared statements for database operations
  • Implement proper error handling that doesn't leak sensitive information
  • Follow principle of least privilege for all component interactions

Agent Development Security:

  • Validate all agent activation triggers and parameters
  • Implement secure inter-agent communication protocols
  • Use controlled execution environments for agent operations
  • Include security-focused testing for all agent capabilities

MCP Integration Security:

  • Validate all MCP server responses and data integrity
  • Implement secure credential handling for authenticated servers
  • Use sandboxed execution for external MCP server interactions
  • Include comprehensive error handling for MCP communication failures

Command Implementation:

  • Sanitize all command parameters and file paths
  • Implement proper authorization checks for privileged operations
  • Use safe defaults and explicit opt-in for risky functionality
  • Include comprehensive input validation and bounds checking

Testing Requirements:

  • Security-focused unit tests for all security-critical functionality
  • Integration tests that include adversarial inputs and edge cases
  • Regular security scanning of dependencies and external integrations
  • Penetration testing for new features with external communication

Code Review Security:

  • Security-focused code review for all changes to core framework
  • Automated security scanning integrated into CI/CD pipeline
  • Regular dependency audits and update procedures
  • Documentation review for security implications of new features

External Integration:

  • Secure API communication with proper authentication and encryption
  • Validation of all external data sources and third-party services
  • Sandboxed execution for external tool integration
  • Clear documentation of security boundaries and trust relationships

📋 Security Checklist

Before Release

Pre-Release Security Validation:

Dependency Security:

  • Run dependency vulnerability scanning (pip audit, npm audit)
  • Update all dependencies to latest secure versions
  • Review new dependencies for security implications
  • Verify supply chain security for critical dependencies

Code Security Review:

  • Security-focused code review for all new features
  • Static analysis security testing (SAST) completion
  • Manual review of security-critical functionality
  • Validation of input sanitization and output encoding

Configuration Security:

  • Review default configuration for secure-by-default settings
  • Validate configuration schema and input validation
  • Test configuration file permission requirements
  • Verify backup and recovery functionality

MCP Server Security:

  • Test MCP server connection security and error handling
  • Validate MCP server authentication and authorization
  • Review MCP server communication protocols
  • Test MCP server failure scenarios and fallback behavior

Integration Testing:

  • Security-focused integration tests with adversarial inputs
  • Cross-platform security validation
  • End-to-end workflow security testing
  • Performance testing under security constraints

Documentation Security:

  • Security documentation updates and accuracy review
  • User security guidance validation and testing
  • Developer security guidelines review
  • Vulnerability disclosure process documentation update

Regular Maintenance

Daily Security Monitoring:

  • Automated dependency vulnerability scanning
  • Security alert monitoring from GitHub and package registries
  • Community-reported issue triage and assessment
  • Log analysis for suspicious activity patterns

Weekly Security Tasks:

  • Dependency update evaluation and testing
  • Security-focused code review for incoming contributions
  • MCP server security configuration review
  • User-reported security issue investigation

Monthly Security Maintenance:

  • Comprehensive dependency audit and update cycle
  • Security documentation review and updates
  • MCP server integration security testing
  • Framework configuration security validation

Quarterly Security Review:

  • Complete security architecture review
  • Threat model updates and validation
  • Security testing and penetration testing
  • Security training and awareness updates for contributors

Annual Security Assessment:

  • External security audit consideration
  • Security policy and procedure review
  • Incident response plan testing and updates
  • Security roadmap planning and prioritization

Continuous Monitoring:

  • Automated security scanning in CI/CD pipeline
  • Real-time monitoring for new vulnerability disclosures
  • Community security discussion monitoring
  • Security research and best practice tracking

Response Procedures:

  • Established incident response procedures for security events
  • Communication plans for security advisories and updates
  • Rollback procedures for security-related issues
  • Community notification systems for critical security updates

🤝 Security Community

Bug Bounty Program

Security Researcher Recognition:

Hall of Fame: Security researchers who responsibly disclose vulnerabilities are recognized in:

  • Security advisory acknowledgments
  • Annual security report contributor recognition
  • GitHub contributor recognition and special mentions
  • Community newsletter and blog post acknowledgments

Recognition Criteria:

  • Responsible disclosure following established timeline
  • High-quality vulnerability reports with clear reproduction steps
  • Constructive collaboration during fix development and testing
  • Adherence to ethical security research practices

Public Recognition:

  • CVE credit for qualifying vulnerabilities
  • Security advisory co-authorship for significant discoveries
  • Speaking opportunities at community events and conferences
  • Priority review for future security research and contributions

Current Incentive Structure: SuperClaude Framework currently operates as an open-source project without monetary bug bounty rewards. Recognition focuses on professional acknowledgment and community contribution value.

Future Incentive Considerations: As the project grows and secures funding:

  • Potential monetary rewards for critical vulnerability discoveries
  • Exclusive access to pre-release security testing opportunities
  • Enhanced collaboration opportunities with security team
  • Priority support for security research and tooling requests

Qualifying Vulnerability Types:

  • Framework core security vulnerabilities
  • Agent coordination security issues
  • MCP server integration security problems
  • Configuration security and privilege escalation
  • Data integrity and confidentiality issues

Non-Qualifying Issues:

  • Issues in third-party dependencies (report to respective projects)
  • Social engineering or physical security issues
  • Denial of service through resource exhaustion (unless critical)
  • Security issues requiring highly privileged access or custom configuration

Security Advisory Process

Security Advisory Lifecycle:

Advisory Creation:

  1. Initial Assessment: Vulnerability validation and impact analysis
  2. Advisory Draft: Technical description, affected versions, and impact assessment
  3. Fix Development: Coordinated patch development with testing
  4. Pre-Release Review: Advisory accuracy and completeness validation

Stakeholder Coordination:

  • Reporter Communication: Regular updates and collaboration on fix validation
  • Maintainer Review: Technical accuracy and fix verification
  • Community Preparation: Pre-announcement for high-impact vulnerabilities
  • Downstream Notification: Alert dependent projects and distributions

Disclosure Timeline:

  • Coordinated Disclosure: 90-day standard timeline from fix availability
  • Emergency Disclosure: Immediate for actively exploited vulnerabilities
  • Extended Coordination: Additional time for complex fixes with prior agreement
  • Public Release: Advisory publication with fix deployment

Advisory Content:

  • Vulnerability Description: Clear technical explanation of the security issue
  • Impact Assessment: CVSS score and real-world impact analysis
  • Affected Versions: Complete list of vulnerable framework versions
  • Fix Information: Patch details, workarounds, and upgrade instructions
  • Credit: Responsible disclosure acknowledgment and researcher recognition

Distribution Channels:

  • GitHub Security Advisories for primary notification
  • Community mailing lists and discussion forums
  • Social media announcements for high-impact issues
  • Vulnerability databases (CVE, NVD) for formal tracking

Post-Disclosure:

  • Community Q&A and support for advisory understanding
  • Lessons learned analysis and process improvement
  • Security documentation updates based on discovered issues
  • Enhanced testing and validation for similar vulnerability classes

📞 Contact Information

Security Team

Primary Security Contact:

  • Email: anton.knoery@gmail.com
  • Monitored By: Core maintainers and security-focused contributors
  • Response Time: 48-72 hours for initial acknowledgment
  • Escalation: Direct maintainer contact for critical issues requiring immediate attention

Security Team Structure:

  • Lead Security Maintainer: Responsible for security policy and coordination
  • Code Security Reviewers: Focus on secure coding practices and vulnerability assessment
  • Infrastructure Security: MCP server security and integration validation
  • Community Security Liaisons: Interface with security researchers and community

GitHub Security Integration:

Encrypted Communication: For sensitive security discussions requiring encrypted communication:

  • GPG Key: Available upon request to anton.knoery@gmail.com
  • Signal: Secure messaging coordination available for complex cases
  • Private Channels: Dedicated security discussion channels for verified researchers

Emergency Contact: For critical vulnerabilities requiring immediate attention:

  • Priority Email: anton.knoery@gmail.com (monitored continuously)
  • Escalation Path: Direct maintainer contact information provided upon first contact

General Security Questions

General Security Questions:

Technical Security Support:

  • Configuration Help: MCP server security setup and validation
  • Best Practices: Secure usage patterns and recommendations
  • Integration Security: Third-party tool security considerations
  • Compliance Questions: Security framework compliance and standards

Educational Resources:

  • Security Guides: Framework security documentation and tutorials
  • Webinars: Community security education and awareness sessions
  • Blog Posts: Security tips, best practices, and case studies
  • Conference Talks: Security-focused presentations and demonstrations

Professional Support: For organizations requiring dedicated security support:

  • Consulting: Security architecture review and recommendations
  • Custom Security: Tailored security implementations and validation
  • Training: Security-focused training for development teams
  • Compliance: Assistance with security compliance and audit requirements

Response Expectations:

  • General Questions: 3-5 business days through community channels
  • Technical Support: 1-2 business days for configuration assistance
  • Best Practices: Community-driven responses with maintainer oversight
  • Professional Inquiries: Direct contact for custom arrangements

📚 Additional Resources

Framework Security Documentation:

MCP Server Security:

  • MCP Servers Guide - Server security configuration
  • Troubleshooting Guide - Security-related issue resolution
  • MCP Server Documentation - Individual server security considerations
  • Configuration Security - Secure MCP setup and credential management

Agent Security:

  • Agents Guide - Agent security boundaries and coordination
  • Agent Development - Security considerations for agent implementation
  • Behavioral Modes - Security implications of different operational modes
  • Command Security - Security aspects of command execution and validation

Session Management Security:

  • Session Management Guide - Secure session handling
  • Memory Security - Secure handling of persistent session data
  • Project Isolation - Security boundaries between different projects
  • Context Security - Secure context loading and validation

External Security Resources

Security Standards and Frameworks:

  • OWASP Top 10: Web application security risks and mitigation strategies
  • NIST Cybersecurity Framework: Comprehensive security risk management
  • CIS Controls: Critical security controls for effective cyber defense
  • ISO 27001: Information security management systems standard

Python Security Resources:

Node.js Security Resources:

  • Node.js Security Working Group: https://github.com/nodejs/security-wg
  • npm audit: Dependency vulnerability scanning
  • Snyk: Comprehensive dependency security monitoring
  • Node Security Platform: Security advisories and vulnerability database

AI/ML Security:

  • OWASP AI Security: AI/ML security guidance and best practices
  • NIST AI Risk Management Framework: AI system security considerations
  • Microsoft Responsible AI: AI security and privacy best practices
  • Google AI Safety: AI system safety and security research

Development Security:

  • OWASP DevSecOps: Security integration in development workflows
  • GitHub Security Features: Security scanning and dependency management
  • SAST Tools: Static application security testing resources
  • Secure Code Review: Security-focused code review practices

Security Policy Maintenance:

Last Updated: December 2024 (SuperClaude Framework v4.0) Next Review: March 2025 (Quarterly review cycle) Version: 4.1.5 (Updated for v4 architectural changes)

Review Schedule:

  • Quarterly Reviews: Security policy accuracy and completeness assessment
  • Release Reviews: Policy updates for new features and architectural changes
  • Incident Reviews: Policy updates based on security incidents and lessons learned
  • Annual Assessment: Comprehensive security policy and procedure review

Change Management:

  • Minor Updates: Clarifications and contact information updates
  • Major Updates: Architectural changes, new security features, and process improvements
  • Emergency Updates: Critical security policy changes requiring immediate implementation
  • Community Input: Regular solicitation of community feedback and improvement suggestions

Security Contributor Acknowledgments:

SuperClaude Framework's security posture benefits from community-driven security research, responsible disclosure, and collaborative improvement efforts.

Security Contributors:

  • Security researchers who responsibly disclose vulnerabilities
  • Community members who identify and report security configuration issues
  • Developers who contribute security-focused code improvements and testing
  • Documentation contributors who improve security guidance and best practices

Recognition:

  • GitHub Contributors - Complete contributor recognition
  • Security advisories include researcher acknowledgment and credit
  • Annual security report highlights significant security contributions
  • Community discussions celebrate helpful security guidance and support

Ongoing Security Community: The SuperClaude security community continues growing through shared commitment to secure AI-assisted development workflows. Security-focused contributions, from vulnerability reports to secure coding practices, strengthen the framework for all users.

Join Security Efforts: Whether you're reporting security issues, improving security documentation, or contributing security-focused code, your efforts help build more secure software development tools for the entire community.