mirror of
https://github.com/SuperClaude-Org/SuperClaude_Framework.git
synced 2025-12-29 16:16:08 +00:00
Major reorganization of SuperClaude V4 Beta directories: - Moved SuperClaude-Lite content to Framework-Hooks/ - Renamed SuperClaude/ directories to Framework/ for clarity - Created separate Framework-Lite/ for lightweight variant - Consolidated hooks system under Framework-Hooks/ This restructuring aligns with the V4 Beta architecture: - Framework/: Full framework with all features - Framework-Lite/: Lightweight variant - Framework-Hooks/: Hooks system implementation Part of SuperClaude V4 Beta development roadmap. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
4.8 KiB
4.8 KiB
Sequential MCP Server
Purpose
Multi-step problem solving, architectural analysis, systematic debugging
Activation Patterns
Automatic Activation:
- Complex debugging scenarios requiring systematic investigation
- System design questions needing structured analysis
- Any
--thinkflags (--think, --think-hard, --ultrathink) - Multi-step problems requiring decomposition and analysis
Manual Activation:
- Flag:
--seq,--sequential
Smart Detection:
- Multi-step reasoning patterns detected in user queries
- Complex architectural or system-level questions
- Problems requiring hypothesis testing and validation
- Iterative refinement or improvement workflows
Flags
--seq / --sequential
- Enable Sequential for complex multi-step analysis
- Auto-activates: Complex debugging, system design, --think flags
- Detection: debug/trace/analyze keywords, nested conditionals, async chains
--no-seq / --no-sequential
- Disable Sequential server
- Fallback: Native Claude Code analysis
- Performance: 10-30% faster for simple tasks
Workflow Process
- Problem Decomposition: Break complex problems into analyzable components
- Server Coordination: Coordinate with Context7 for documentation, Magic for UI insights, Playwright for testing
- Systematic Analysis: Apply structured thinking to each component
- Relationship Mapping: Identify dependencies, interactions, and feedback loops
- Hypothesis Generation: Create testable hypotheses for each component
- Evidence Gathering: Collect supporting evidence through tool usage
- Multi-Server Synthesis: Combine findings from multiple servers
- Recommendation Generation: Provide actionable next steps with priority ordering
- Validation: Check reasoning for logical consistency
Integration Points
Commands: analyze, troubleshoot, explain, improve, estimate, task, document, design, git, test
Thinking Modes:
--think(4K): Module-level analysis with context awareness--think-hard(10K): System-wide analysis with architectural focus--ultrathink(32K): Critical system analysis with comprehensive coverage
Other MCP Servers:
- Context7: Documentation lookup and pattern verification
- Magic: UI component analysis and insights
- Playwright: Testing validation and performance analysis
Strategic Orchestration
When to Use Sequential
- Complex Debugging: Multi-layer issues requiring systematic investigation
- Architecture Planning: System design requiring structured analysis
- Performance Optimization: Bottleneck identification needing methodical approach
- Risk Assessment: Security or compliance analysis requiring comprehensive coverage
- Cross-Domain Problems: Issues spanning multiple technical domains
Multi-Server Orchestration Patterns
- Analysis Coordination: Sequential coordinates analysis across Context7, Magic, Playwright
- Evidence Synthesis: Combines findings from multiple servers into cohesive insights
- Progressive Enhancement: Iterative improvement cycles with quality validation
- Hypothesis Testing: Structured validation of assumptions across server capabilities
Advanced Reasoning Strategies
- Parallel Analysis Streams: Multiple reasoning chains explored simultaneously
- Cross-Domain Validation: Findings validated across different technical domains
- Dependency Chain Mapping: Complex system relationships analyzed systematically
- Risk-Weighted Decision Making: Solutions prioritized by impact and implementation complexity
- Continuous Learning Integration: Patterns and outcomes fed back into analysis models
Use Cases
- Root cause analysis for complex bugs: Systematic investigation of multi-component failures
- Performance bottleneck identification: Structured analysis of system performance issues
- Architecture review and improvement planning: Comprehensive architectural assessment
- Security threat modeling and vulnerability analysis: Systematic security evaluation
- Code quality assessment with improvement roadmaps: Structured quality analysis
- Structured documentation workflows: Organized content creation and multilingual organization
- Iterative improvement analysis: Progressive refinement planning with Loop command
Error Recovery
- Sequential timeout → Native analysis with reduced depth
- Incomplete analysis → Partial results with gap identification
- Server coordination failure → Continue with available servers
Quality Gates Integration
- Step 2 - Type Analysis: Deep type compatibility checking and context-aware type inference
- Step 4 - Security Assessment: Vulnerability analysis, threat modeling, and OWASP compliance
- Step 6 - Performance Analysis: Performance benchmarking and optimization recommendations