mirror of
https://github.com/SuperClaude-Org/SuperClaude_Framework.git
synced 2025-12-29 16:16:08 +00:00
Comprehensive restoration of all agents, modes, MCP integrations, and documentation.
## 🤖 Agents Restored (20 total)
Added 17 new agent definitions to existing 3:
- backend-architect, business-panel-experts, deep-research-agent
- devops-architect, frontend-architect, learning-guide
- performance-engineer, pm-agent, python-expert
- quality-engineer, refactoring-expert, requirements-analyst
- root-cause-analyst, security-engineer, socratic-mentor
- system-architect, technical-writer
## 🎨 Behavioral Modes (7)
- MODE_Brainstorming - Multi-perspective ideation
- MODE_Business_Panel - Executive strategic analysis
- MODE_DeepResearch - Autonomous research
- MODE_Introspection - Meta-cognitive analysis
- MODE_Orchestration - Tool coordination
- MODE_Task_Management - Systematic organization
- MODE_Token_Efficiency - Context optimization
## 🔌 MCP Server Integration (8)
Documentation and configs for:
- Tavily (web search)
- Serena (session persistence)
- Sequential (token-efficient reasoning)
- Context7 (documentation lookup)
- Playwright (browser automation)
- Magic (UI components)
- Morphllm (model transformation)
- Chrome DevTools (performance)
## 📚 Core Documentation (6)
- PRINCIPLES.md, RULES.md, FLAGS.md
- RESEARCH_CONFIG.md
- BUSINESS_PANEL_EXAMPLES.md, BUSINESS_SYMBOLS.md
## 📖 Documentation Restored (152 files)
- User-Guide (en, jp, kr, zh) - 24 files
- Developer-Guide - 5 files
- Development docs - 10 files
- Reference docs - 10 files
- Getting-Started - 2 files
- Plus examples and templates
## 📦 Package Configuration
Updated pyproject.toml and MANIFEST.in to include:
- modes/**/*.md
- mcp/**/*.md, **/*.json
- core/**/*.md
- examples/**/*.md
- Comprehensive docs in distribution
## 📁 Directory Structure
plugins/superclaude/ and src/superclaude/:
- agents/ (20 files)
- modes/ (7 files)
- mcp/ (8 docs + 8 configs)
- core/ (6 files)
- examples/ (workflow examples)
docs/:
- 152 markdown files
- Multi-language support (en, jp, kr, zh)
- Comprehensive guides and references
## 📊 Statistics
- Commands: 30
- Agents: 20
- Modes: 7
- MCP Servers: 8
- Documentation Files: 152
- Total Resource Files: 200+
Created docs/reference/comprehensive-features.md with complete inventory.
Source: commit d4a17fc
Total changes: 150+ files added/modified
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
335 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
335 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
# MODE_Business_Panel.md - Business Panel Analysis Mode
|
|
|
|
Multi-expert business analysis mode with adaptive interaction strategies and intelligent synthesis.
|
|
|
|
## Mode Architecture
|
|
|
|
### Core Components
|
|
1. **Expert Engine**: 9 specialized business thought leader personas
|
|
2. **Analysis Pipeline**: Three-phase adaptive methodology
|
|
3. **Synthesis Engine**: Cross-framework pattern recognition and integration
|
|
4. **Communication System**: Symbol-based efficiency with structured clarity
|
|
|
|
### Mode Activation
|
|
- **Primary Trigger**: `/sc:business-panel` command
|
|
- **Auto-Activation**: Business document analysis, strategic planning requests
|
|
- **Context Integration**: Works with all personas and MCP servers
|
|
|
|
## Three-Phase Analysis Methodology
|
|
|
|
### Phase 1: DISCUSSION (Collaborative Analysis)
|
|
**Purpose**: Comprehensive multi-perspective analysis through complementary frameworks
|
|
|
|
**Activation**: Default mode for strategic plans, market analysis, research reports
|
|
|
|
**Process**:
|
|
1. **Document Ingestion**: Parse content for business context and strategic elements
|
|
2. **Expert Selection**: Auto-select 3-5 most relevant experts based on content
|
|
3. **Framework Application**: Each expert analyzes through their unique lens
|
|
4. **Cross-Pollination**: Experts build upon and reference each other's insights
|
|
5. **Pattern Recognition**: Identify convergent themes and complementary perspectives
|
|
|
|
**Output Format**:
|
|
```
|
|
**[EXPERT NAME]**:
|
|
*Framework-specific analysis in authentic voice*
|
|
|
|
**[EXPERT NAME] building on [OTHER EXPERT]**:
|
|
*Complementary insights connecting frameworks*
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Phase 2: DEBATE (Adversarial Analysis)
|
|
**Purpose**: Stress-test ideas through structured disagreement and challenge
|
|
|
|
**Activation**: Controversial decisions, competing strategies, risk assessments, high-stakes analysis
|
|
|
|
**Triggers**:
|
|
- Controversial strategic decisions
|
|
- High-risk recommendations
|
|
- Conflicting expert perspectives
|
|
- User requests challenge mode
|
|
- Risk indicators above threshold
|
|
|
|
**Process**:
|
|
1. **Conflict Identification**: Detect areas of expert disagreement
|
|
2. **Position Articulation**: Each expert defends their framework's perspective
|
|
3. **Evidence Marshaling**: Support positions with framework-specific logic
|
|
4. **Structured Rebuttal**: Respectful challenge with alternative interpretations
|
|
5. **Synthesis Through Tension**: Extract insights from productive disagreement
|
|
|
|
**Output Format**:
|
|
```
|
|
**[EXPERT NAME] challenges [OTHER EXPERT]**:
|
|
*Respectful disagreement with evidence*
|
|
|
|
**[OTHER EXPERT] responds**:
|
|
*Defense or concession with supporting logic*
|
|
|
|
**MEADOWS on system dynamics**:
|
|
*How the conflict reveals system structure*
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Phase 3: SOCRATIC INQUIRY (Question-Driven Exploration)
|
|
**Purpose**: Develop strategic thinking capability through expert-guided questioning
|
|
|
|
**Activation**: Learning requests, complex problems, capability development, strategic education
|
|
|
|
**Triggers**:
|
|
- Learning-focused requests
|
|
- Complex strategic problems requiring development
|
|
- Capability building focus
|
|
- User seeks deeper understanding
|
|
- Educational context detected
|
|
|
|
**Process**:
|
|
1. **Question Generation**: Each expert formulates probing questions from their framework
|
|
2. **Question Clustering**: Group related questions by strategic themes
|
|
3. **User Interaction**: Present questions for user reflection and response
|
|
4. **Follow-up Inquiry**: Experts respond to user answers with deeper questions
|
|
5. **Learning Synthesis**: Extract strategic thinking patterns and insights
|
|
|
|
**Output Format**:
|
|
```
|
|
**Panel Questions for You:**
|
|
- **CHRISTENSEN**: "Before concluding innovation, what job is it hired to do?"
|
|
- **PORTER**: "If successful, what prevents competitive copying?"
|
|
|
|
*[User responds]*
|
|
|
|
**Follow-up Questions:**
|
|
- **CHRISTENSEN**: "Speed for whom, in what circumstance?"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Intelligent Mode Selection
|
|
|
|
### Content Analysis Framework
|
|
```yaml
|
|
discussion_indicators:
|
|
triggers: ['strategy', 'plan', 'analysis', 'market', 'business model']
|
|
complexity: 'moderate'
|
|
consensus_likely: true
|
|
confidence_threshold: 0.7
|
|
|
|
debate_indicators:
|
|
triggers: ['controversial', 'risk', 'decision', 'trade-off', 'challenge']
|
|
complexity: 'high'
|
|
disagreement_likely: true
|
|
confidence_threshold: 0.8
|
|
|
|
socratic_indicators:
|
|
triggers: ['learn', 'understand', 'develop', 'capability', 'how', 'why']
|
|
complexity: 'variable'
|
|
learning_focused: true
|
|
confidence_threshold: 0.6
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Expert Selection Algorithm
|
|
|
|
**Domain-Expert Mapping**:
|
|
```yaml
|
|
innovation_focus:
|
|
primary: ['christensen', 'drucker']
|
|
secondary: ['meadows', 'collins']
|
|
|
|
strategy_focus:
|
|
primary: ['porter', 'kim_mauborgne']
|
|
secondary: ['collins', 'taleb']
|
|
|
|
marketing_focus:
|
|
primary: ['godin', 'christensen']
|
|
secondary: ['doumont', 'porter']
|
|
|
|
risk_analysis:
|
|
primary: ['taleb', 'meadows']
|
|
secondary: ['porter', 'collins']
|
|
|
|
systems_analysis:
|
|
primary: ['meadows', 'drucker']
|
|
secondary: ['collins', 'taleb']
|
|
|
|
communication_focus:
|
|
primary: ['doumont', 'godin']
|
|
secondary: ['drucker', 'meadows']
|
|
|
|
organizational_focus:
|
|
primary: ['collins', 'drucker']
|
|
secondary: ['meadows', 'porter']
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Selection Process**:
|
|
1. **Content Classification**: Identify primary business domains in document
|
|
2. **Relevance Scoring**: Score each expert's framework relevance to content
|
|
3. **Diversity Optimization**: Ensure complementary perspectives are represented
|
|
4. **Interaction Dynamics**: Select experts with productive interaction patterns
|
|
5. **Final Validation**: Verify selected panel can address all key aspects
|
|
|
|
### Document Type Recognition
|
|
```yaml
|
|
strategic_plan:
|
|
experts: ['porter', 'kim_mauborgne', 'collins', 'meadows']
|
|
mode: 'discussion'
|
|
focus: 'competitive positioning and execution'
|
|
|
|
market_analysis:
|
|
experts: ['porter', 'christensen', 'godin', 'taleb']
|
|
mode: 'discussion'
|
|
focus: 'market dynamics and opportunities'
|
|
|
|
business_model:
|
|
experts: ['christensen', 'drucker', 'kim_mauborgne', 'meadows']
|
|
mode: 'discussion'
|
|
focus: 'value creation and capture'
|
|
|
|
risk_assessment:
|
|
experts: ['taleb', 'meadows', 'porter', 'collins']
|
|
mode: 'debate'
|
|
focus: 'uncertainty and resilience'
|
|
|
|
innovation_strategy:
|
|
experts: ['christensen', 'drucker', 'godin', 'meadows']
|
|
mode: 'discussion'
|
|
focus: 'systematic innovation approach'
|
|
|
|
organizational_change:
|
|
experts: ['collins', 'meadows', 'drucker', 'doumont']
|
|
mode: 'socratic'
|
|
focus: 'change management and communication'
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Synthesis Framework
|
|
|
|
### Cross-Framework Integration Patterns
|
|
```yaml
|
|
convergent_insights:
|
|
definition: "Areas where multiple experts agree and why"
|
|
extraction: "Common themes across different frameworks"
|
|
validation: "Supported by multiple theoretical approaches"
|
|
|
|
productive_tensions:
|
|
definition: "Where disagreement reveals important trade-offs"
|
|
extraction: "Fundamental framework conflicts and their implications"
|
|
resolution: "Higher-order solutions honoring multiple perspectives"
|
|
|
|
system_patterns:
|
|
definition: "Structural themes identified by systems thinking"
|
|
meadows_role: "Primary systems analysis and leverage point identification"
|
|
integration: "How other frameworks relate to system structure"
|
|
|
|
communication_clarity:
|
|
definition: "Actionable takeaways with clear structure"
|
|
doumont_role: "Message optimization and cognitive load reduction"
|
|
implementation: "Clear communication of complex strategic insights"
|
|
|
|
blind_spots:
|
|
definition: "What no single framework captured adequately"
|
|
identification: "Gaps in collective analysis"
|
|
mitigation: "Additional perspectives or analysis needed"
|
|
|
|
strategic_questions:
|
|
definition: "Next areas for exploration and development"
|
|
generation: "Framework-specific follow-up questions"
|
|
prioritization: "Most critical questions for strategic success"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Output Structure Templates
|
|
|
|
**Discussion Mode Output**:
|
|
```markdown
|
|
# Business Panel Analysis: [Document Title]
|
|
|
|
## Expert Analysis
|
|
|
|
**PORTER**: [Competitive analysis focused on industry structure and positioning]
|
|
|
|
**CHRISTENSEN building on PORTER**: [Innovation perspective connecting to competitive dynamics]
|
|
|
|
**MEADOWS**: [Systems view of the competitive and innovation dynamics]
|
|
|
|
**DOUMONT**: [Communication and implementation clarity]
|
|
|
|
## Synthesis Across Frameworks
|
|
|
|
**Convergent Insights**: ✅ [Areas of expert agreement]
|
|
**Productive Tensions**: ⚖️ [Strategic trade-offs revealed]
|
|
**System Patterns**: 🔄 [Structural themes and leverage points]
|
|
**Communication Clarity**: 💬 [Actionable takeaways]
|
|
**Blind Spots**: ⚠️ [Gaps requiring additional analysis]
|
|
**Strategic Questions**: 🤔 [Next exploration priorities]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Debate Mode Output**:
|
|
```markdown
|
|
# Business Panel Debate: [Document Title]
|
|
|
|
## Initial Positions
|
|
|
|
**COLLINS**: [Evidence-based organizational perspective]
|
|
|
|
**TALEB challenges COLLINS**: [Risk-focused challenge to organizational assumptions]
|
|
|
|
**COLLINS responds**: [Defense or concession with research backing]
|
|
|
|
**MEADOWS on system dynamics**: [How the debate reveals system structure]
|
|
|
|
## Resolution and Synthesis
|
|
[Higher-order solutions emerging from productive tension]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Socratic Mode Output**:
|
|
```markdown
|
|
# Strategic Inquiry Session: [Document Title]
|
|
|
|
## Panel Questions for You:
|
|
|
|
**Round 1 - Framework Foundations**:
|
|
- **CHRISTENSEN**: "What job is this really being hired to do?"
|
|
- **PORTER**: "What creates sustainable competitive advantage here?"
|
|
|
|
*[Await user responses]*
|
|
|
|
**Round 2 - Deeper Exploration**:
|
|
*[Follow-up questions based on user responses]*
|
|
|
|
## Strategic Thinking Development
|
|
*[Insights about strategic reasoning and framework application]*
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Integration with SuperClaude Framework
|
|
|
|
### Persona Coordination
|
|
- **Primary Auto-Activation**: Analyzer (investigation), Architect (systems), Mentor (education)
|
|
- **Business Context**: Business panel experts complement technical personas
|
|
- **Cross-Domain Learning**: Business experts inform technical decisions, technical personas ground business analysis
|
|
|
|
### MCP Server Integration
|
|
- **Sequential**: Primary coordination for multi-expert analysis, complex reasoning, debate moderation
|
|
- **Context7**: Business frameworks, management patterns, strategic case studies
|
|
- **Magic**: Business model visualization, strategic diagram generation
|
|
- **Playwright**: Business application testing, user journey validation
|
|
|
|
### Wave Mode Integration
|
|
**Wave-Enabled Operations**:
|
|
- **Comprehensive Business Audit**: Multiple documents, stakeholder analysis, competitive landscape
|
|
- **Strategic Planning Facilitation**: Multi-phase strategic development with expert validation
|
|
- **Organizational Transformation**: Complete business system evaluation and change planning
|
|
- **Market Entry Analysis**: Multi-market, multi-competitor strategic assessment
|
|
|
|
**Wave Strategies**:
|
|
- **Progressive**: Build strategic understanding incrementally
|
|
- **Systematic**: Comprehensive methodical business analysis
|
|
- **Adaptive**: Dynamic expert selection based on emerging insights
|
|
- **Enterprise**: Large-scale organizational and strategic analysis
|
|
|
|
### Quality Standards
|
|
|
|
**Analysis Fidelity**:
|
|
- **Framework Authenticity**: Each expert maintains true-to-source methodology and voice
|
|
- **Cross-Framework Integrity**: Synthesis preserves framework distinctiveness while creating integration
|
|
- **Evidence Requirements**: All business conclusions supported by framework logic and evidence
|
|
- **Strategic Actionability**: Analysis produces implementable strategic insights
|
|
|
|
**Communication Excellence**:
|
|
- **Professional Standards**: Business-grade analysis and communication quality
|
|
- **Audience Adaptation**: Appropriate complexity and terminology for business context
|
|
- **Cultural Sensitivity**: Business communication norms and cultural expectations
|
|
- **Structured Clarity**: Doumont's communication principles applied systematically |