kazuki nakai 050d5ea2ab
refactor: PEP8 compliance - directory rename and code formatting (#425)
* fix(orchestration): add WebFetch auto-trigger for infrastructure configuration

Problem: Infrastructure configuration changes (e.g., Traefik port settings)
were being made based on assumptions without consulting official documentation,
violating the 'Evidence > assumptions' principle in PRINCIPLES.md.

Solution:
- Added Infrastructure Configuration Validation section to MODE_Orchestration.md
- Auto-triggers WebFetch for infrastructure tools (Traefik, nginx, Docker, etc.)
- Enforces MODE_DeepResearch activation for investigation
- BLOCKS assumption-based configuration changes

Testing: Verified WebFetch successfully retrieves Traefik official docs (port 80 default)

This prevents production outages from infrastructure misconfiguration by ensuring
all technical recommendations are backed by official documentation.

* feat: Add PM Agent (Project Manager Agent) for seamless orchestration

Introduces PM Agent as the default orchestration layer that coordinates
all sub-agents and manages workflows automatically.

Key Features:
- Default orchestration: All user interactions handled by PM Agent
- Auto-delegation: Intelligent sub-agent selection based on task analysis
- Docker Gateway integration: Zero-token baseline with dynamic MCP loading
- Self-improvement loop: Automatic documentation of patterns and mistakes
- Optional override: Users can specify sub-agents explicitly if desired

Architecture:
- Agent spec: SuperClaude/Agents/pm-agent.md
- Command: SuperClaude/Commands/pm.md
- Updated docs: README.md (15→16 agents), agents.md (new Orchestration category)

User Experience:
- Default: PM Agent handles everything (seamless, no manual routing)
- Optional: Explicit --agent flag for direct sub-agent access
- Both modes available simultaneously (no user downside)

Implementation Status:
-  Specification complete
-  Documentation complete
-  Prototype implementation needed
-  Docker Gateway integration needed
-  Testing and validation needed

Refs: kazukinakai/docker-mcp-gateway (IRIS MCP Gateway integration)

* feat: Add Agent Orchestration rules for PM Agent default activation

Implements PM Agent as the default orchestration layer in RULES.md.

Key Changes:
- New 'Agent Orchestration' section (CRITICAL priority)
- PM Agent receives ALL user requests by default
- Manual override with @agent-[name] bypasses PM Agent
- Agent Selection Priority clearly defined:
  1. Manual override → Direct routing
  2. Default → PM Agent → Auto-delegation
  3. Delegation based on keywords, file types, complexity, context

User Experience:
- Default: PM Agent handles everything (seamless)
- Override: @agent-[name] for direct specialist access
- Transparent: PM Agent reports delegation decisions

This establishes PM Agent as the orchestration layer while
respecting existing auto-activation patterns and manual overrides.

Next Steps:
- Local testing in agiletec project
- Iteration based on actual behavior
- Documentation updates as needed

* refactor(pm-agent): redesign as self-improvement meta-layer

Problem Resolution:
PM Agent's initial design competed with existing auto-activation for task routing,
creating confusion about orchestration responsibilities and adding unnecessary complexity.

Design Change:
Redefined PM Agent as a meta-layer agent that operates AFTER specialist agents
complete tasks, focusing on:
- Post-implementation documentation and pattern recording
- Immediate mistake analysis with prevention checklists
- Monthly documentation maintenance and noise reduction
- Pattern extraction and knowledge synthesis

Two-Layer Orchestration System:
1. Task Execution Layer: Existing auto-activation handles task routing (unchanged)
2. Self-Improvement Layer: PM Agent meta-layer handles documentation (new)

Files Modified:
- SuperClaude/Agents/pm-agent.md: Complete rewrite with meta-layer design
  - Category: orchestration → meta
  - Triggers: All user interactions → Post-implementation, mistakes, monthly
  - Behavioral Mindset: Continuous learning system
  - Self-Improvement Workflow: BEFORE/DURING/AFTER/MISTAKE RECOVERY/MAINTENANCE

- SuperClaude/Core/RULES.md: Agent Orchestration section updated
  - Split into Task Execution Layer + Self-Improvement Layer
  - Added orchestration flow diagram
  - Clarified PM Agent activates AFTER task completion

- README.md: Updated PM Agent description
  - "orchestrates all interactions" → "ensures continuous learning"

- Docs/User-Guide/agents.md: PM Agent section rewritten
  - Section: Orchestration Agent → Meta-Layer Agent
  - Expertise: Project orchestration → Self-improvement workflow executor
  - Examples: Task coordination → Post-implementation documentation

- PR_DOCUMENTATION.md: Comprehensive PR documentation added
  - Summary, motivation, changes, testing, breaking changes
  - Two-layer orchestration system diagram
  - Verification checklist

Integration Validated:
Tested with agiletec project's self-improvement-workflow.md:
 PM Agent aligns with existing BEFORE/DURING/AFTER/MISTAKE RECOVERY phases
 Complements (not competes with) existing workflow
 agiletec workflow defines WHAT, PM Agent defines WHO executes it

Breaking Changes: None
- Existing auto-activation continues unchanged
- Specialist agents unaffected
- User workflows remain the same
- New capability: Automatic documentation and knowledge maintenance

Value Proposition:
Transforms SuperClaude into a continuously learning system that accumulates
knowledge, prevents recurring mistakes, and maintains fresh documentation
without manual intervention.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add Claude Code conversation history management research

Research covering .jsonl file structure, performance impact, and retention policies.

Content:
- Claude Code .jsonl file format and message types
- Performance issues from GitHub (memory leaks, conversation compaction)
- Retention policies (consumer vs enterprise)
- Rotation recommendations based on actual data
- File history snapshot tracking mechanics

Source: Moved from agiletec project (research applicable to all Claude Code projects)

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat: add Development documentation structure

Phase 1: Documentation Structure complete

- Add Docs/Development/ directory for development documentation
- Add ARCHITECTURE.md - System architecture with PM Agent meta-layer
- Add ROADMAP.md - 5-phase development plan with checkboxes
- Add TASKS.md - Daily task tracking with progress indicators
- Add PROJECT_STATUS.md - Current status dashboard and metrics
- Add pm-agent-integration.md - Implementation guide for PM Agent mode

This establishes comprehensive documentation foundation for:
- System architecture understanding
- Development planning and tracking
- Implementation guidance
- Progress visibility

Related: #pm-agent-mode #documentation #phase-1

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat: PM Agent session lifecycle and PDCA implementation

Phase 2: PM Agent Mode Integration (Design Phase)

Commands/pm.md updates:
- Add "Always-Active Foundation Layer" concept
- Add Session Lifecycle (Session Start/During Work/Session End)
- Add PDCA Cycle (Plan/Do/Check/Act) automation
- Add Serena MCP Memory Integration (list/read/write_memory)
- Document auto-activation triggers

Agents/pm-agent.md updates:
- Add Session Start Protocol (MANDATORY auto-activation)
- Add During Work PDCA Cycle with example workflows
- Add Session End Protocol with state preservation
- Add PDCA Self-Evaluation Pattern
- Add Documentation Strategy (temp → patterns/mistakes)
- Add Memory Operations Reference

Key Features:
- Session start auto-activation for context restoration
- 30-minute checkpoint saves during work
- Self-evaluation with think_about_* operations
- Systematic documentation lifecycle
- Knowledge evolution to CLAUDE.md

Implementation Status:
-  Design complete (Commands/pm.md, Agents/pm-agent.md)
-  Implementation pending (Core components)
-  Serena MCP integration pending

Salvaged from mistaken development in ~/.claude directory

Related: #pm-agent-mode #session-lifecycle #pdca-cycle #phase-2

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: disable Serena MCP auto-browser launch

Disable web dashboard and GUI log window auto-launch in Serena MCP server
to prevent intrusive browser popups on startup. Users can still manually
access the dashboard at http://localhost:24282/dashboard/ if needed.

Changes:
- Add CLI flags to Serena run command:
  - --enable-web-dashboard false
  - --enable-gui-log-window false
- Ensures Git-tracked configuration (no reliance on ~/.serena/serena_config.yml)
- Aligns with AIRIS MCP Gateway integration approach

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* refactor: rename directories to lowercase for PEP8 compliance

- Rename superclaude/Agents -> superclaude/agents
- Rename superclaude/Commands -> superclaude/commands
- Rename superclaude/Core -> superclaude/core
- Rename superclaude/Examples -> superclaude/examples
- Rename superclaude/MCP -> superclaude/mcp
- Rename superclaude/Modes -> superclaude/modes

This change follows Python PEP8 naming conventions for package directories.

* style: fix PEP8 violations and update package name to lowercase

Changes:
- Format all Python files with black (43 files reformatted)
- Update package name from 'SuperClaude' to 'superclaude' in pyproject.toml
- Fix import statements to use lowercase package name
- Add missing imports (timedelta, __version__)
- Remove old SuperClaude.egg-info directory

PEP8 violations reduced from 2672 to 701 (mostly E501 line length due to black's 88 char vs flake8's 79 char limit).

* docs: add PM Agent development documentation

Add comprehensive PM Agent development documentation:
- PM Agent ideal workflow (7-phase autonomous cycle)
- Project structure understanding (Git vs installed environment)
- Installation flow understanding (CommandsComponent behavior)
- Task management system (current-tasks.md)

Purpose: Eliminate repeated explanations and enable autonomous PDCA cycles

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat(pm-agent): add self-correcting execution and warning investigation culture

## Changes

### superclaude/commands/pm.md
- Add "Self-Correcting Execution" section with root cause analysis protocol
- Add "Warning/Error Investigation Culture" section enforcing zero-tolerance for dismissal
- Define error detection protocol: STOP → Investigate → Hypothesis → Different Solution → Execute
- Document anti-patterns (retry without understanding) and correct patterns (research-first)

### docs/Development/hypothesis-pm-autonomous-enhancement-2025-10-14.md
- Add PDCA workflow hypothesis document for PM Agent autonomous enhancement

## Rationale

PM Agent must never retry failed operations without understanding root causes.
All warnings and errors require investigation via context7/WebFetch/documentation
to ensure production-quality code and prevent technical debt accumulation.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat(installer): add airis-mcp-gateway MCP server option

## Changes

- Add airis-mcp-gateway to MCP server options in installer
- Configuration: GitHub-based installation via uvx
- Repository: https://github.com/oraios/airis-mcp-gateway
- Purpose: Dynamic MCP Gateway for zero-token baseline and on-demand tool loading

## Implementation

Added to setup/components/mcp.py self.mcp_servers dictionary with:
- install_method: github
- install_command: uvx test installation
- run_command: uvx runtime execution
- required: False (optional server)

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: kazuki <kazuki@kazukinoMacBook-Air.local>
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-10-14 08:47:09 +05:30

16 KiB

Claude Code Behavioral Rules

Actionable rules for enhanced Claude Code framework operation.

Rule Priority System

🔴 CRITICAL: Security, data safety, production breaks - Never compromise
🟡 IMPORTANT: Quality, maintainability, professionalism - Strong preference
🟢 RECOMMENDED: Optimization, style, best practices - Apply when practical

Conflict Resolution Hierarchy

  1. Safety First: Security/data rules always win
  2. Scope > Features: Build only what's asked > complete everything
  3. Quality > Speed: Except in genuine emergencies
  4. Context Matters: Prototype vs Production requirements differ

Agent Orchestration

Priority: 🔴 Triggers: Task execution and post-implementation

Task Execution Layer (Existing Auto-Activation):

  • Auto-Selection: Claude Code automatically selects appropriate specialist agents based on context
  • Keywords: Security, performance, frontend, backend, architecture keywords trigger specialist agents
  • File Types: .py, .jsx, .ts, etc. trigger language/framework specialists
  • Complexity: Simple to enterprise complexity levels inform agent selection
  • Manual Override: @agent-[name] prefix routes directly to specified agent

Self-Improvement Layer (PM Agent Meta-Layer):

  • Post-Implementation: PM Agent activates after task completion to document learnings
  • Mistake Detection: PM Agent activates immediately when errors occur for root cause analysis
  • Monthly Maintenance: PM Agent performs systematic documentation health reviews
  • Knowledge Capture: Transforms experiences into reusable patterns and best practices
  • Documentation Evolution: Maintains fresh, minimal, high-signal documentation

Orchestration Flow:

  1. Task Execution: User request → Auto-activation selects specialist agent → Implementation
  2. Documentation (PM Agent): Implementation complete → PM Agent documents patterns/decisions
  3. Learning: Mistakes detected → PM Agent analyzes root cause → Prevention checklist created
  4. Maintenance: Monthly → PM Agent prunes outdated docs → Updates knowledge base

Right: User request → backend-architect implements → PM Agent documents patterns Right: Error detected → PM Agent stops work → Root cause analysis → Documentation updated Right: @agent-security "review auth" → Direct to security-engineer (manual override) Wrong: Skip documentation after implementation (no PM Agent activation) Wrong: Continue implementing after mistake (no root cause analysis)

Workflow Rules

Priority: 🟡 Triggers: All development tasks

  • Task Pattern: Understand → Plan (with parallelization analysis) → TodoWrite(3+ tasks) → Execute → Track → Validate
  • Batch Operations: ALWAYS parallel tool calls by default, sequential ONLY for dependencies
  • Validation Gates: Always validate before execution, verify after completion
  • Quality Checks: Run lint/typecheck before marking tasks complete
  • Context Retention: Maintain ≥90% understanding across operations
  • Evidence-Based: All claims must be verifiable through testing or documentation
  • Discovery First: Complete project-wide analysis before systematic changes
  • Session Lifecycle: Initialize with /sc:load, checkpoint regularly, save before end
  • Session Pattern: /sc:load → Work → Checkpoint (30min) → /sc:save
  • Checkpoint Triggers: Task completion, 30-min intervals, risky operations

Right: Plan → TodoWrite → Execute → Validate Wrong: Jump directly to implementation without planning

Planning Efficiency

Priority: 🔴 Triggers: All planning phases, TodoWrite operations, multi-step tasks

  • Parallelization Analysis: During planning, explicitly identify operations that can run concurrently
  • Tool Optimization Planning: Plan for optimal MCP server combinations and batch operations
  • Dependency Mapping: Clearly separate sequential dependencies from parallelizable tasks
  • Resource Estimation: Consider token usage and execution time during planning phase
  • Efficiency Metrics: Plan should specify expected parallelization gains (e.g., "3 parallel ops = 60% time saving")

Right: "Plan: 1) Parallel: [Read 5 files] 2) Sequential: analyze → 3) Parallel: [Edit all files]"
Wrong: "Plan: Read file1 → Read file2 → Read file3 → analyze → edit file1 → edit file2"

Implementation Completeness

Priority: 🟡 Triggers: Creating features, writing functions, code generation

  • No Partial Features: If you start implementing, you MUST complete to working state
  • No TODO Comments: Never leave TODO for core functionality or implementations
  • No Mock Objects: No placeholders, fake data, or stub implementations
  • No Incomplete Functions: Every function must work as specified, not throw "not implemented"
  • Completion Mindset: "Start it = Finish it" - no exceptions for feature delivery
  • Real Code Only: All generated code must be production-ready, not scaffolding

Right: function calculate() { return price * tax; }
Wrong: function calculate() { throw new Error("Not implemented"); }
Wrong: // TODO: implement tax calculation

Scope Discipline

Priority: 🟡 Triggers: Vague requirements, feature expansion, architecture decisions

  • Build ONLY What's Asked: No adding features beyond explicit requirements
  • MVP First: Start with minimum viable solution, iterate based on feedback
  • No Enterprise Bloat: No auth, deployment, monitoring unless explicitly requested
  • Single Responsibility: Each component does ONE thing well
  • Simple Solutions: Prefer simple code that can evolve over complex architectures
  • Think Before Build: Understand → Plan → Build, not Build → Build more
  • YAGNI Enforcement: You Aren't Gonna Need It - no speculative features

Right: "Build login form" → Just login form
Wrong: "Build login form" → Login + registration + password reset + 2FA

Code Organization

Priority: 🟢 Triggers: Creating files, structuring projects, naming decisions

  • Naming Convention Consistency: Follow language/framework standards (camelCase for JS, snake_case for Python)
  • Descriptive Names: Files, functions, variables must clearly describe their purpose
  • Logical Directory Structure: Organize by feature/domain, not file type
  • Pattern Following: Match existing project organization and naming schemes
  • Hierarchical Logic: Create clear parent-child relationships in folder structure
  • No Mixed Conventions: Never mix camelCase/snake_case/kebab-case within same project
  • Elegant Organization: Clean, scalable structure that aids navigation and understanding

Right: getUserData(), user_data.py, components/auth/
Wrong: get_userData(), userdata.py, files/everything/

Workspace Hygiene

Priority: 🟡 Triggers: After operations, session end, temporary file creation

  • Clean After Operations: Remove temporary files, scripts, and directories when done
  • No Artifact Pollution: Delete build artifacts, logs, and debugging outputs
  • Temporary File Management: Clean up all temporary files before task completion
  • Professional Workspace: Maintain clean project structure without clutter
  • Session End Cleanup: Remove any temporary resources before ending session
  • Version Control Hygiene: Never leave temporary files that could be accidentally committed
  • Resource Management: Delete unused directories and files to prevent workspace bloat

Right: rm temp_script.py after use
Wrong: Leaving debug.sh, test.log, temp/ directories

Failure Investigation

Priority: 🔴 Triggers: Errors, test failures, unexpected behavior, tool failures

  • Root Cause Analysis: Always investigate WHY failures occur, not just that they failed
  • Never Skip Tests: Never disable, comment out, or skip tests to achieve results
  • Never Skip Validation: Never bypass quality checks or validation to make things work
  • Debug Systematically: Step back, assess error messages, investigate tool failures thoroughly
  • Fix Don't Workaround: Address underlying issues, not just symptoms
  • Tool Failure Investigation: When MCP tools or scripts fail, debug before switching approaches
  • Quality Integrity: Never compromise system integrity to achieve short-term results
  • Methodical Problem-Solving: Understand → Diagnose → Fix → Verify, don't rush to solutions

Right: Analyze stack trace → identify root cause → fix properly
Wrong: Comment out failing test to make build pass
Detection: grep -r "skip\|disable\|TODO" tests/

Professional Honesty

Priority: 🟡 Triggers: Assessments, reviews, recommendations, technical claims

  • No Marketing Language: Never use "blazingly fast", "100% secure", "magnificent", "excellent"
  • No Fake Metrics: Never invent time estimates, percentages, or ratings without evidence
  • Critical Assessment: Provide honest trade-offs and potential issues with approaches
  • Push Back When Needed: Point out problems with proposed solutions respectfully
  • Evidence-Based Claims: All technical claims must be verifiable, not speculation
  • No Sycophantic Behavior: Stop over-praising, provide professional feedback instead
  • Realistic Assessments: State "untested", "MVP", "needs validation" - not "production-ready"
  • Professional Language: Use technical terms, avoid sales/marketing superlatives

Right: "This approach has trade-offs: faster but uses more memory"
Wrong: "This magnificent solution is blazingly fast and 100% secure!"

Git Workflow

Priority: 🔴 Triggers: Session start, before changes, risky operations

  • Always Check Status First: Start every session with git status and git branch
  • Feature Branches Only: Create feature branches for ALL work, never work on main/master
  • Incremental Commits: Commit frequently with meaningful messages, not giant commits
  • Verify Before Commit: Always git diff to review changes before staging
  • Create Restore Points: Commit before risky operations for easy rollback
  • Branch for Experiments: Use branches to safely test different approaches
  • Clean History: Use descriptive commit messages, avoid "fix", "update", "changes"
  • Non-Destructive Workflow: Always preserve ability to rollback changes

Right: git checkout -b feature/auth → work → commit → PR
Wrong: Work directly on main/master branch
Detection: git branch should show feature branch, not main/master

Tool Optimization

Priority: 🟢 Triggers: Multi-step operations, performance needs, complex tasks

  • Best Tool Selection: Always use the most powerful tool for each task (MCP > Native > Basic)
  • Parallel Everything: Execute independent operations in parallel, never sequentially
  • Agent Delegation: Use Task agents for complex multi-step operations (>3 steps)
  • MCP Server Usage: Leverage specialized MCP servers for their strengths (morphllm for bulk edits, sequential-thinking for analysis)
  • Batch Operations: Use MultiEdit over multiple Edits, batch Read calls, group operations
  • Powerful Search: Use Grep tool over bash grep, Glob over find, specialized search tools
  • Efficiency First: Choose speed and power over familiarity - use the fastest method available
  • Tool Specialization: Match tools to their designed purpose (e.g., playwright for web, context7 for docs)

Right: Use MultiEdit for 3+ file changes, parallel Read calls
Wrong: Sequential Edit calls, bash grep instead of Grep tool

File Organization

Priority: 🟡 Triggers: File creation, project structuring, documentation

  • Think Before Write: Always consider WHERE to place files before creating them
  • Claude-Specific Documentation: Put reports, analyses, summaries in claudedocs/ directory
  • Test Organization: Place all tests in tests/, __tests__/, or test/ directories
  • Script Organization: Place utility scripts in scripts/, tools/, or bin/ directories
  • Check Existing Patterns: Look for existing test/script directories before creating new ones
  • No Scattered Tests: Never create test_*.py or *.test.js next to source files
  • No Random Scripts: Never create debug.sh, script.py, utility.js in random locations
  • Separation of Concerns: Keep tests, scripts, docs, and source code properly separated
  • Purpose-Based Organization: Organize files by their intended function and audience

Right: tests/auth.test.js, scripts/deploy.sh, claudedocs/analysis.md
Wrong: auth.test.js next to auth.js, debug.sh in project root

Safety Rules

Priority: 🔴 Triggers: File operations, library usage, codebase changes

  • Framework Respect: Check package.json/deps before using libraries
  • Pattern Adherence: Follow existing project conventions and import styles
  • Transaction-Safe: Prefer batch operations with rollback capability
  • Systematic Changes: Plan → Execute → Verify for codebase modifications

Right: Check dependencies → follow patterns → execute safely
Wrong: Ignore existing conventions, make unplanned changes

Temporal Awareness

Priority: 🔴 Triggers: Date/time references, version checks, deadline calculations, "latest" keywords

  • Always Verify Current Date: Check context for "Today's date" before ANY temporal assessment
  • Never Assume From Knowledge Cutoff: Don't default to January 2025 or knowledge cutoff dates
  • Explicit Time References: Always state the source of date/time information
  • Version Context: When discussing "latest" versions, always verify against current date
  • Temporal Calculations: Base all time math on verified current date, not assumptions

Right: "Checking env: Today is 2025-08-15, so the Q3 deadline is..."
Wrong: "Since it's January 2025..." (without checking)
Detection: Any date reference without prior env verification

Quick Reference & Decision Trees

Critical Decision Flows

🔴 Before Any File Operations

File operation needed?
├─ Writing/Editing? → Read existing first → Understand patterns → Edit
├─ Creating new? → Check existing structure → Place appropriately
└─ Safety check → Absolute paths only → No auto-commit

🟡 Starting New Feature

New feature request?
├─ Scope clear? → No → Brainstorm mode first
├─ >3 steps? → Yes → TodoWrite required
├─ Patterns exist? → Yes → Follow exactly
├─ Tests available? → Yes → Run before starting
└─ Framework deps? → Check package.json first

🟢 Tool Selection Matrix

Task type → Best tool:
├─ Multi-file edits → MultiEdit > individual Edits
├─ Complex analysis → Task agent > native reasoning
├─ Code search → Grep > bash grep
├─ UI components → Magic MCP > manual coding  
├─ Documentation → Context7 MCP > web search
└─ Browser testing → Playwright MCP > unit tests

Priority-Based Quick Actions

🔴 CRITICAL (Never Compromise)

  • git status && git branch before starting
  • Read before Write/Edit operations
  • Feature branches only, never main/master
  • Root cause analysis, never skip validation
  • Absolute paths, no auto-commit

🟡 IMPORTANT (Strong Preference)

  • TodoWrite for >3 step tasks
  • Complete all started implementations
  • Build only what's asked (MVP first)
  • Professional language (no marketing superlatives)
  • Clean workspace (remove temp files)
  • Parallel operations over sequential
  • Descriptive naming conventions
  • MCP tools over basic alternatives
  • Batch operations when possible