BUSINESS_SYMBOLS.md - Business Analysis Symbol System
Enhanced symbol system for business panel analysis with strategic focus and efficiency optimization.
Business-Specific Symbols
Strategic Analysis
| Symbol |
Meaning |
Usage Context |
| 🎯 |
strategic target, objective |
Key goals and outcomes |
| 📈 |
growth opportunity, positive trend |
Market growth, revenue increase |
| 📉 |
decline, risk, negative trend |
Market decline, threats |
| 💰 |
financial impact, revenue |
Economic drivers, profit centers |
| ⚖️ |
trade-offs, balance |
Strategic decisions, resource allocation |
| 🏆 |
competitive advantage |
Unique value propositions, strengths |
| 🔄 |
business cycle, feedback loop |
Recurring patterns, system dynamics |
| 🌊 |
blue ocean, new market |
Uncontested market space |
| 🏭 |
industry, market structure |
Competitive landscape |
| 🎪 |
remarkable, purple cow |
Standout products, viral potential |
Framework Integration
| Symbol |
Expert |
Framework Element |
| 🔨 |
Christensen |
Jobs-to-be-Done |
| ⚔️ |
Porter |
Five Forces |
| 🎪 |
Godin |
Purple Cow/Remarkable |
| 🌊 |
Kim/Mauborgne |
Blue Ocean |
| 🚀 |
Collins |
Flywheel Effect |
| 🛡️ |
Taleb |
Antifragile/Robustness |
| 🕸️ |
Meadows |
System Structure |
| 💬 |
Doumont |
Clear Communication |
| 🧭 |
Drucker |
Management Fundamentals |
Analysis Process
| Symbol |
Process Stage |
Description |
| 🔍 |
investigation |
Initial analysis and discovery |
| 💡 |
insight |
Key realizations and breakthroughs |
| 🤝 |
consensus |
Expert agreement areas |
| ⚡ |
tension |
Productive disagreement |
| 🎭 |
debate |
Adversarial analysis mode |
| ❓ |
socratic |
Question-driven exploration |
| 🧩 |
synthesis |
Cross-framework integration |
| 📋 |
conclusion |
Final recommendations |
Business Logic Flow
| Symbol |
Meaning |
Business Context |
| → |
causes, leads to |
Market trends → opportunities |
| ⇒ |
strategic transformation |
Current state ⇒ desired future |
| ← |
constraint, limitation |
Resource limits ← budget |
| ⇄ |
mutual influence |
Customer needs ⇄ product development |
| ∴ |
strategic conclusion |
Market analysis ∴ go-to-market strategy |
| ∵ |
business rationale |
Expand ∵ market opportunity |
| ≡ |
strategic equivalence |
Strategy A ≡ Strategy B outcomes |
| ≠ |
competitive differentiation |
Our approach ≠ competitors |
Expert Voice Symbols
Communication Styles
| Expert |
Symbol |
Voice Characteristic |
| Christensen |
📚 |
Academic, methodical |
| Porter |
📊 |
Analytical, data-driven |
| Drucker |
🧠 |
Wise, fundamental |
| Godin |
💬 |
Conversational, provocative |
| Kim/Mauborgne |
🎨 |
Strategic, value-focused |
| Collins |
📖 |
Research-driven, disciplined |
| Taleb |
🎲 |
Contrarian, risk-aware |
| Meadows |
🌐 |
Holistic, systems-focused |
| Doumont |
✏️ |
Precise, clarity-focused |
Synthesis Output Templates
Discussion Mode Synthesis
## 🧩 SYNTHESIS ACROSS FRAMEWORKS
**🤝 Convergent Insights**: [Where multiple experts agree]
- 🎯 Strategic alignment on [key area]
- 💰 Economic consensus around [financial drivers]
- 🏆 Shared view of competitive advantage
**⚖️ Productive Tensions**: [Strategic trade-offs revealed]
- 📈 Growth vs 🛡️ Risk management (Taleb ⚡ Collins)
- 🌊 Innovation vs 📊 Market positioning (Kim/Mauborgne ⚡ Porter)
**🕸️ System Patterns** (Meadows analysis):
- Leverage points: [key intervention opportunities]
- Feedback loops: [reinforcing/balancing dynamics]
**💬 Communication Clarity** (Doumont optimization):
- Core message: [essential strategic insight]
- Action priorities: [implementation sequence]
**⚠️ Blind Spots**: [Gaps requiring additional analysis]
**🤔 Strategic Questions**: [Next exploration priorities]
Debate Mode Synthesis
## ⚡ PRODUCTIVE TENSIONS RESOLVED
**Initial Conflict**: [Primary disagreement area]
- 📚 **CHRISTENSEN position**: [Innovation framework perspective]
- 📊 **PORTER counter**: [Competitive strategy challenge]
**🔄 Resolution Process**:
[How experts found common ground or maintained productive tension]
**🧩 Higher-Order Solution**:
[Strategy that honors multiple frameworks]
**🕸️ Systems Insight** (Meadows):
[How the debate reveals deeper system dynamics]
Socratic Mode Synthesis
## 🎓 STRATEGIC THINKING DEVELOPMENT
**🤔 Question Themes Explored**:
- Framework lens: [Which expert frameworks were applied]
- Strategic depth: [Level of analysis achieved]
**💡 Learning Insights**:
- Pattern recognition: [Strategic thinking patterns developed]
- Framework integration: [How to combine expert perspectives]
**🧭 Next Development Areas**:
[Strategic thinking capabilities to develop further]
Token Efficiency Integration
Compression Strategies
- Expert Voice Compression: Maintain authenticity while reducing verbosity
- Framework Symbol Substitution: Use symbols for common framework concepts
- Structured Output: Organized templates reducing repetitive text
- Smart Abbreviation: Business-specific abbreviations with context preservation
Business Abbreviations
common_terms:
'comp advantage': 'competitive advantage'
'value prop': 'value proposition'
'go-to-market': 'GTM'
'total addressable market': 'TAM'
'customer acquisition cost': 'CAC'
'lifetime value': 'LTV'
'key performance indicator': 'KPI'
'return on investment': 'ROI'
'minimum viable product': 'MVP'
'product-market fit': 'PMF'
frameworks:
'jobs-to-be-done': 'JTBD'
'blue ocean strategy': 'BOS'
'good to great': 'G2G'
'five forces': '5F'
'value chain': 'VC'
'four actions framework': 'ERRC'
Mode Configuration
Default Settings
business_panel_config:
# Expert Selection
max_experts: 5
min_experts: 3
auto_select: true
diversity_optimization: true
# Analysis Depth
phase_progression: adaptive
synthesis_required: true
cross_framework_validation: true
# Output Control
symbol_compression: true
structured_templates: true
expert_voice_preservation: 0.85
# Integration
mcp_sequential_primary: true
mcp_context7_patterns: true
persona_coordination: true
Performance Optimization
- Token Budget: 15-30K tokens for comprehensive analysis
- Expert Caching: Store expert personas for session reuse
- Framework Reuse: Cache framework applications for similar content
- Synthesis Templates: Pre-structured output formats for efficiency
- Parallel Analysis: Where possible, run expert analysis in parallel
Quality Assurance
Authenticity Validation
- Voice Consistency: Each expert maintains characteristic communication style
- Framework Fidelity: Analysis follows authentic framework methodology
- Interaction Realism: Expert interactions reflect realistic professional dynamics
- Synthesis Integrity: Combined insights maintain individual framework value
Business Analysis Standards
- Strategic Relevance: Analysis addresses real business strategic concerns
- Implementation Feasibility: Recommendations are actionable and realistic
- Evidence Base: Conclusions supported by framework logic and business evidence
- Professional Quality: Analysis meets executive-level business communication standards
3762d6ab24