mirror of
https://github.com/SuperClaude-Org/SuperClaude_Framework.git
synced 2025-12-29 16:16:08 +00:00
1145 lines
38 KiB
Markdown
1145 lines
38 KiB
Markdown
|
|
# SuperClaude Technical Architecture Guide
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Version**: V4 Beta
|
||
|
|
**Target Audience**: Advanced users, contributors, and technical stakeholders
|
||
|
|
**Purpose**: Understanding SuperClaude's orchestrator system and internal architecture
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Table of Contents
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. [Architecture Overview](#architecture-overview)
|
||
|
|
2. [Detection Engine](#detection-engine)
|
||
|
|
3. [Routing Intelligence](#routing-intelligence)
|
||
|
|
4. [Quality Framework](#quality-framework)
|
||
|
|
5. [Performance System](#performance-system)
|
||
|
|
6. [Agent Coordination](#agent-coordination)
|
||
|
|
7. [MCP Integration](#mcp-integration)
|
||
|
|
8. [Configuration](#configuration)
|
||
|
|
9. [Extensibility](#extensibility)
|
||
|
|
10. [Technical Reference](#technical-reference)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Architecture Overview
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
SuperClaude V4 implements a sophisticated orchestrator system that intelligently routes tasks, manages resources, and coordinates between multiple specialized components. The architecture follows a **multi-layered orchestration pattern** with clear separation between detection, routing, execution, and validation phases.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Core Components
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||
|
|
│ ORCHESTRATOR CORE │
|
||
|
|
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
||
|
|
│ Detection Engine │ Routing Intelligence │ Quality Gates │
|
||
|
|
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
||
|
|
│ Agent Layer │ MCP Layer │
|
||
|
|
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
||
|
|
│ Command Interface │ Session Management │
|
||
|
|
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
||
|
|
│ Component Registry │
|
||
|
|
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### System Design Principles
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. **Intelligent Adaptation**: Automatic detection and optimization based on task complexity and resource constraints
|
||
|
|
2. **Hierarchical Delegation**: Multi-level task breakdown with appropriate specialization
|
||
|
|
3. **Resource Awareness**: Dynamic adaptation to performance constraints and context limitations
|
||
|
|
4. **Quality First**: Comprehensive validation gates and quality assurance at every level
|
||
|
|
5. **Extensible Architecture**: Component-based design enabling easy extension and customization
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Architecture Layers
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Detection Layer**: Pattern recognition and trigger analysis for automatic mode activation
|
||
|
|
**Routing Layer**: Intelligent decision matrices for optimal tool and agent selection
|
||
|
|
**Execution Layer**: Coordinated task execution with parallel processing capabilities
|
||
|
|
**Validation Layer**: Quality gates and comprehensive result verification
|
||
|
|
**Management Layer**: Session persistence, configuration, and cross-session continuity
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Detection Engine
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The detection engine implements sophisticated pattern recognition to automatically activate appropriate behavioral modes and routing decisions. It operates through a **multi-tier trigger system** with explicit priority rules and conflict resolution.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Trigger Architecture
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
Input Analysis
|
||
|
|
↓
|
||
|
|
Pattern Recognition (Lexical + Semantic + Context)
|
||
|
|
↓
|
||
|
|
Priority Resolution (Critical > Important > Recommended)
|
||
|
|
↓
|
||
|
|
Mode Activation + Flag Setting
|
||
|
|
↓
|
||
|
|
Routing Decision Matrix
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Detection Patterns
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Lexical Triggers
|
||
|
|
- **Keywords**: Direct command words (`brainstorm`, `analyze`, `implement`)
|
||
|
|
- **Uncertainty Markers**: `maybe`, `thinking about`, `not sure`, `could we`
|
||
|
|
- **Complexity Indicators**: `complex`, `multi-step`, `system-wide`, `enterprise`
|
||
|
|
- **Performance Keywords**: `optimize`, `efficient`, `parallel`, `resource`
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Semantic Analysis
|
||
|
|
- **Scope Detection**: File count (>3 triggers task-manage), directory depth, project complexity
|
||
|
|
- **Domain Recognition**: UI/frontend, backend/API, testing, security, infrastructure patterns
|
||
|
|
- **Complexity Assessment**: Multi-component dependencies, cross-system integration needs
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Context Awareness
|
||
|
|
- **Resource Monitoring**: Context usage percentage, token consumption patterns
|
||
|
|
- **Session State**: Previous operations, accumulated complexity, fatigue indicators
|
||
|
|
- **Environment Detection**: Production vs development, critical vs experimental contexts
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Auto-Activation Logic
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The detection engine uses **weighted scoring** with configurable thresholds:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
```python
|
||
|
|
# Conceptual scoring algorithm
|
||
|
|
def calculate_activation_score(input_text, context):
|
||
|
|
score = 0
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Lexical weight (30%)
|
||
|
|
score += lexical_pattern_match(input_text) * 0.3
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Semantic weight (40%)
|
||
|
|
score += semantic_complexity_analysis(input_text) * 0.4
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Context weight (30%)
|
||
|
|
score += context_awareness_factors(context) * 0.3
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
return score
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Activation thresholds
|
||
|
|
THRESHOLDS = {
|
||
|
|
"brainstorm": 0.6,
|
||
|
|
"task-manage": 0.7,
|
||
|
|
"orchestrate": 0.75,
|
||
|
|
"introspect": 0.8,
|
||
|
|
"token-efficient": 0.85
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Priority Resolution Rules
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. **Safety First**: `--safe-mode` > `--validate` > optimization flags
|
||
|
|
2. **Explicit Override**: User-specified flags > auto-detection
|
||
|
|
3. **Depth Hierarchy**: `--ultrathink` > `--think-hard` > `--think`
|
||
|
|
4. **MCP Control**: `--no-mcp` overrides all individual MCP flags
|
||
|
|
5. **Scope Precedence**: `system` > `project` > `module` > `file`
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Routing Intelligence
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The routing intelligence system implements a **dynamic decision matrix** that selects optimal tools, agents, and execution strategies based on task characteristics and system constraints.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Decision Matrix Architecture
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
Task Analysis
|
||
|
|
↓
|
||
|
|
Tool Selection Matrix → Agent Selection Matrix → MCP Selection Matrix
|
||
|
|
↓ ↓ ↓
|
||
|
|
Resource Assessment → Parallel Opportunity → Quality Requirements
|
||
|
|
↓
|
||
|
|
Execution Strategy (Sequential/Parallel/Delegated)
|
||
|
|
↓
|
||
|
|
Performance Optimization (Batch/Stream/Cache)
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Master Routing Table
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
| Task Type | Primary Tool | Backup Tool | Agent | MCP Server | Parallelizable |
|
||
|
|
|-----------|--------------|-------------|-------|------------|----------------|
|
||
|
|
| UI Components | Magic MCP | Manual coding | Frontend | Magic | No |
|
||
|
|
| Deep Analysis | Sequential MCP | Native reasoning | Architect | Sequential | No |
|
||
|
|
| Symbol Operations | Serena MCP | Manual search | Backend | Serena | Yes |
|
||
|
|
| Pattern Edits | Morphllm MCP | Individual edits | Refactoring | Morphllm | Yes |
|
||
|
|
| Documentation | Context7 MCP | Web search | Technical Writer | Context7 | Yes |
|
||
|
|
| Browser Testing | Playwright MCP | Unit tests | QA | Playwright | No |
|
||
|
|
| Multi-file Edits | MultiEdit | Sequential Edits | Multiple | Various | Yes |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Coordination Patterns
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Sequential Coordination
|
||
|
|
Used for tasks with strict dependencies:
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
Task A (prerequisite) → Task B (depends on A) → Task C (depends on B)
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Parallel Coordination
|
||
|
|
Used for independent operations:
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
Task A ─┐
|
||
|
|
Task B ─┼─→ Synchronization Point → Next Phase
|
||
|
|
Task C ─┘
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Hierarchical Delegation
|
||
|
|
Used for complex multi-domain tasks:
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
Epic Level (System Architect)
|
||
|
|
├─ Story 1 (Backend Architect)
|
||
|
|
│ ├─ Task 1.1 (Python Expert)
|
||
|
|
│ └─ Task 1.2 (Security Engineer)
|
||
|
|
└─ Story 2 (Frontend Architect)
|
||
|
|
├─ Task 2.1 (UI/UX)
|
||
|
|
└─ Task 2.2 (Performance Engineer)
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Resource-Aware Routing
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The routing system adapts based on resource availability:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Green Zone (0-75% resource usage)
|
||
|
|
- Full capability routing enabled
|
||
|
|
- All MCP servers available
|
||
|
|
- Normal verbosity and detail levels
|
||
|
|
- Parallel execution preferred
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Yellow Zone (75-85% resource usage)
|
||
|
|
- Efficiency mode activation
|
||
|
|
- Selective MCP server usage
|
||
|
|
- Reduced verbosity
|
||
|
|
- Batch operations prioritized
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Red Zone (85%+ resource usage)
|
||
|
|
- Essential operations only
|
||
|
|
- Native tools preferred over MCP
|
||
|
|
- Minimal output generation
|
||
|
|
- Fail-fast on complex requests
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Quality Framework
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
SuperClaude implements a comprehensive **multi-gate quality system** with validation checkpoints throughout the execution pipeline.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Quality Gate Architecture
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
Pre-Execution Gates
|
||
|
|
↓
|
||
|
|
Execution Monitoring
|
||
|
|
↓
|
||
|
|
Post-Execution Validation
|
||
|
|
↓
|
||
|
|
Quality Metrics Collection
|
||
|
|
↓
|
||
|
|
Continuous Improvement Feedback
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Validation Gates
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Gate 1: Pre-Execution Validation
|
||
|
|
- **Scope Validation**: Task scope vs capability assessment
|
||
|
|
- **Resource Validation**: Available resources vs requirements
|
||
|
|
- **Dependency Validation**: Prerequisites and component availability
|
||
|
|
- **Risk Assessment**: Potential failure modes and mitigation strategies
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Gate 2: Execution Monitoring
|
||
|
|
- **Progress Tracking**: Task completion percentage and milestone validation
|
||
|
|
- **Quality Metrics**: Code quality, test coverage, documentation completeness
|
||
|
|
- **Performance Monitoring**: Resource usage, execution time, efficiency metrics
|
||
|
|
- **Error Detection**: Real-time failure detection and recovery triggers
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Gate 3: Post-Execution Validation
|
||
|
|
- **Completeness Verification**: All requirements satisfied
|
||
|
|
- **Quality Standards**: Code standards, documentation quality, test coverage
|
||
|
|
- **Integration Testing**: Component interaction and system integration
|
||
|
|
- **Performance Validation**: Performance benchmarks and optimization verification
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Quality Standards Framework
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Code Quality Standards
|
||
|
|
```yaml
|
||
|
|
quality_standards:
|
||
|
|
code:
|
||
|
|
no_partial_features: true
|
||
|
|
no_todo_comments: true
|
||
|
|
no_mock_implementations: true
|
||
|
|
completion_required: true
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
testing:
|
||
|
|
never_skip_tests: true
|
||
|
|
never_disable_validation: true
|
||
|
|
root_cause_analysis: required
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
documentation:
|
||
|
|
evidence_based_claims: true
|
||
|
|
realistic_assessments: true
|
||
|
|
professional_language: true
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Quality Metrics
|
||
|
|
- **Functional Quality**: Correctness, reliability, feature completeness
|
||
|
|
- **Structural Quality**: Code organization, maintainability, technical debt
|
||
|
|
- **Performance Quality**: Speed, scalability, resource efficiency
|
||
|
|
- **Security Quality**: Vulnerability management, access control, data protection
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Validation Algorithms
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
```python
|
||
|
|
# Quality assessment algorithm
|
||
|
|
def assess_quality(component, standards):
|
||
|
|
scores = {
|
||
|
|
'functional': assess_functional_quality(component),
|
||
|
|
'structural': assess_structural_quality(component),
|
||
|
|
'performance': assess_performance_quality(component),
|
||
|
|
'security': assess_security_quality(component)
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Weighted overall score
|
||
|
|
weights = {'functional': 0.4, 'structural': 0.3, 'performance': 0.2, 'security': 0.1}
|
||
|
|
overall_score = sum(scores[key] * weights[key] for key in scores)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
return overall_score >= standards.minimum_threshold
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Performance System
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The performance system implements **adaptive resource management** with intelligent optimization strategies based on system constraints and execution requirements.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Resource Management Architecture
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
Resource Monitoring
|
||
|
|
↓
|
||
|
|
Performance Profiling
|
||
|
|
↓
|
||
|
|
Optimization Strategy Selection
|
||
|
|
↓
|
||
|
|
Execution Adaptation
|
||
|
|
↓
|
||
|
|
Performance Feedback Loop
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Performance Optimization Strategies
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Parallel Execution Engine
|
||
|
|
```python
|
||
|
|
# Parallelization decision logic
|
||
|
|
def optimize_execution(tasks, resources):
|
||
|
|
if len(tasks) >= 3 and resources.cpu_available > 0.5:
|
||
|
|
return ParallelExecution(tasks, max_workers=min(len(tasks), resources.max_workers))
|
||
|
|
else:
|
||
|
|
return SequentialExecution(tasks)
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Batch Operation Optimization
|
||
|
|
- **Read Batching**: Multiple file reads in single operation
|
||
|
|
- **Edit Batching**: MultiEdit for 3+ file changes
|
||
|
|
- **Search Batching**: Grouped search operations with result aggregation
|
||
|
|
- **MCP Batching**: Combined MCP server operations for efficiency
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Token Efficiency System
|
||
|
|
Implements **symbol-enhanced communication** for 30-50% token reduction:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
Standard Communication → Symbol Translation → Compressed Output
|
||
|
|
↓ ↓ ↓
|
||
|
|
"Authentication system → "auth.js:45 → 🛡️ sec risk in
|
||
|
|
has security → → 🛡️ security → user val()"
|
||
|
|
vulnerability in → risk in user →
|
||
|
|
user validation" → validation" →
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Concurrency Management
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Concurrency Control Patterns
|
||
|
|
```yaml
|
||
|
|
concurrency_limits:
|
||
|
|
file_operations: 5
|
||
|
|
mcp_servers: 3
|
||
|
|
agent_coordination: 2
|
||
|
|
analysis_depth: 1 # Sequential for deep analysis
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
delegation_triggers:
|
||
|
|
directories: "> 7"
|
||
|
|
files: "> 50"
|
||
|
|
complexity_score: "> 0.8"
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Resource Allocation Strategy
|
||
|
|
```python
|
||
|
|
class ResourceManager:
|
||
|
|
def allocate_resources(self, task_complexity, available_resources):
|
||
|
|
if task_complexity > 0.8:
|
||
|
|
return {
|
||
|
|
'mcp_servers': 'all',
|
||
|
|
'parallel_workers': min(15, available_resources.max_workers),
|
||
|
|
'delegation_mode': 'auto'
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
elif task_complexity > 0.5:
|
||
|
|
return {
|
||
|
|
'mcp_servers': ['sequential', 'context7'],
|
||
|
|
'parallel_workers': min(5, available_resources.max_workers),
|
||
|
|
'delegation_mode': 'files'
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
else:
|
||
|
|
return {
|
||
|
|
'mcp_servers': ['context7'],
|
||
|
|
'parallel_workers': 1,
|
||
|
|
'delegation_mode': 'disabled'
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Agent Coordination
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
SuperClaude implements a **hierarchical agent system** with intelligent coordination patterns and specialized domain expertise.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Agent Architecture
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
System Architect (Strategic Level)
|
||
|
|
↓
|
||
|
|
Domain Specialists (Tactical Level)
|
||
|
|
├─ Backend Architect ├─ Frontend Architect ├─ Security Engineer
|
||
|
|
├─ DevOps Architect ├─ Performance Engineer ├─ Quality Engineer
|
||
|
|
└─ Data Architect └─ Python Expert └─ Requirements Analyst
|
||
|
|
↓
|
||
|
|
Task Executors (Operational Level)
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Coordination Patterns
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Multi-Persona Coordination
|
||
|
|
Complex tasks activate multiple agents with clear responsibility boundaries:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
```yaml
|
||
|
|
task_coordination:
|
||
|
|
epic_level:
|
||
|
|
primary: system-architect
|
||
|
|
secondary: [requirements-analyst, technical-writer]
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
story_level:
|
||
|
|
frontend: [frontend-architect, performance-engineer]
|
||
|
|
backend: [backend-architect, security-engineer, python-expert]
|
||
|
|
devops: [devops-architect, quality-engineer]
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
task_level:
|
||
|
|
implementation: domain-specific-expert
|
||
|
|
validation: quality-engineer
|
||
|
|
documentation: technical-writer
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Agent Selection Matrix
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
| Task Domain | Primary Agent | Supporting Agents | Coordination Pattern |
|
||
|
|
|-------------|---------------|-------------------|---------------------|
|
||
|
|
| Architecture Design | System Architect | Requirements Analyst, Technical Writer | Strategic → Tactical |
|
||
|
|
| Frontend Development | Frontend Architect | Performance Engineer, Quality Engineer | Parallel → Integration |
|
||
|
|
| Backend Development | Backend Architect | Security Engineer, Python Expert | Sequential → Validation |
|
||
|
|
| Infrastructure | DevOps Architect | Security Engineer, Performance Engineer | Parallel → Deployment |
|
||
|
|
| Security Analysis | Security Engineer | System Architect, Quality Engineer | Analysis → Implementation |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Agent Communication Protocols
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Inter-Agent Message Format
|
||
|
|
```json
|
||
|
|
{
|
||
|
|
"from": "system-architect",
|
||
|
|
"to": "backend-architect",
|
||
|
|
"task_id": "auth-system-001",
|
||
|
|
"priority": "high",
|
||
|
|
"context": {
|
||
|
|
"architectural_decisions": [...],
|
||
|
|
"constraints": [...],
|
||
|
|
"requirements": [...]
|
||
|
|
},
|
||
|
|
"deliverables": ["api_design", "security_model", "performance_requirements"]
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Coordination Lifecycle
|
||
|
|
1. **Task Analysis**: System Architect analyzes requirements and creates breakdown
|
||
|
|
2. **Agent Assignment**: Routing intelligence assigns domain specialists
|
||
|
|
3. **Parallel Execution**: Agents execute assigned tasks with progress coordination
|
||
|
|
4. **Integration Review**: Results integrated and validated by coordinating agent
|
||
|
|
5. **Quality Validation**: Quality Engineer performs final validation and sign-off
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## MCP Integration
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration system provides **specialized external capabilities** through intelligent server coordination and optimal task routing.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### MCP Server Architecture
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
SuperClaude Core
|
||
|
|
↓
|
||
|
|
MCP Router (Selection & Coordination)
|
||
|
|
↓
|
||
|
|
┌─────────────┬─────────────┬─────────────┬─────────────┐
|
||
|
|
│ Context7 │ Sequential │ Magic │ Playwright │
|
||
|
|
│ (Docs) │ (Analysis) │ (UI/UX) │ (Testing) │
|
||
|
|
├─────────────┼─────────────┼─────────────┼─────────────┤
|
||
|
|
│ Morphllm │ Serena │ WebSearch │ Custom │
|
||
|
|
│ (Transform) │ (Memory) │ (Fallback) │ (Extended) │
|
||
|
|
└─────────────┴─────────────┴─────────────┴─────────────┘
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### MCP Server Capabilities
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Context7 MCP Server
|
||
|
|
**Purpose**: Official library documentation and framework patterns
|
||
|
|
- **Triggers**: Import statements, framework keywords, version-specific needs
|
||
|
|
- **Capabilities**: Curated documentation lookup, official pattern guidance
|
||
|
|
- **Integration**: Works with Sequential for implementation strategy
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Sequential MCP Server
|
||
|
|
**Purpose**: Multi-step reasoning for complex analysis
|
||
|
|
- **Triggers**: `--think`, `--think-hard`, `--ultrathink` flags, complex debugging
|
||
|
|
- **Capabilities**: Systematic analysis, hypothesis testing, architectural review
|
||
|
|
- **Integration**: Coordinates with all other MCP servers for structured workflows
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Magic MCP Server
|
||
|
|
**Purpose**: Modern UI component generation from 21st.dev patterns
|
||
|
|
- **Triggers**: UI component requests, `/ui`, `/21` commands, design system needs
|
||
|
|
- **Capabilities**: Production-ready accessible components, design system integration
|
||
|
|
- **Integration**: Uses Context7 for framework patterns, Sequential for UI logic
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Playwright MCP Server
|
||
|
|
**Purpose**: Browser automation and E2E testing
|
||
|
|
- **Triggers**: Browser testing, visual validation, accessibility testing
|
||
|
|
- **Capabilities**: Real browser interaction, screenshot comparison, WCAG compliance
|
||
|
|
- **Integration**: Sequential plans testing strategy, Magic validates UI behavior
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Morphllm MCP Server
|
||
|
|
**Purpose**: Pattern-based code editing with token optimization
|
||
|
|
- **Triggers**: Multi-file edits, style enforcement, bulk transformations
|
||
|
|
- **Capabilities**: 30-50% efficiency gains, pattern-based transformations
|
||
|
|
- **Integration**: Serena provides semantic context, Sequential plans edit strategy
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Serena MCP Server
|
||
|
|
**Purpose**: Semantic code understanding with project memory
|
||
|
|
- **Triggers**: Symbol operations, session lifecycle, large codebase navigation
|
||
|
|
- **Capabilities**: LSP integration, cross-session persistence, dependency tracking
|
||
|
|
- **Integration**: Provides context for Morphllm edits, maintains session state
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### MCP Coordination Patterns
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Server Selection Algorithm
|
||
|
|
```python
|
||
|
|
def select_mcp_servers(task_type, complexity, resource_constraints):
|
||
|
|
base_servers = []
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Task-specific server selection
|
||
|
|
if 'ui' in task_type:
|
||
|
|
base_servers.extend(['magic', 'context7'])
|
||
|
|
elif 'analysis' in task_type:
|
||
|
|
base_servers.extend(['sequential', 'context7'])
|
||
|
|
elif 'testing' in task_type:
|
||
|
|
base_servers.extend(['playwright', 'sequential'])
|
||
|
|
elif 'editing' in task_type:
|
||
|
|
base_servers.extend(['morphllm', 'serena'])
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Complexity-based augmentation
|
||
|
|
if complexity > 0.7:
|
||
|
|
base_servers.append('sequential')
|
||
|
|
if complexity > 0.8:
|
||
|
|
base_servers.extend(['context7', 'serena'])
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Resource constraint filtering
|
||
|
|
if resource_constraints.high:
|
||
|
|
return ['context7'] # Most efficient
|
||
|
|
elif resource_constraints.medium:
|
||
|
|
return base_servers[:2] # Limit to 2 servers
|
||
|
|
else:
|
||
|
|
return base_servers
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Multi-Server Workflows
|
||
|
|
```yaml
|
||
|
|
workflow_patterns:
|
||
|
|
documentation_generation:
|
||
|
|
sequence: [context7, sequential, serena]
|
||
|
|
coordination: "context7 → patterns, sequential → structure, serena → persistence"
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
ui_development:
|
||
|
|
sequence: [magic, context7, playwright]
|
||
|
|
coordination: "magic → components, context7 → framework integration, playwright → testing"
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
code_refactoring:
|
||
|
|
sequence: [serena, sequential, morphllm]
|
||
|
|
coordination: "serena → analysis, sequential → strategy, morphllm → execution"
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Configuration
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
SuperClaude provides extensive configuration capabilities through **hierarchical configuration management** with component-based customization.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Configuration Architecture
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
Global Configuration (CLAUDE.md)
|
||
|
|
↓
|
||
|
|
Mode-Specific Configuration (MODE_*.md)
|
||
|
|
↓
|
||
|
|
Component Configuration (Components/*.json)
|
||
|
|
↓
|
||
|
|
Session Configuration (Runtime settings)
|
||
|
|
↓
|
||
|
|
User Overrides (CLI flags, explicit settings)
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Configuration Hierarchy
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Global Configuration Layer
|
||
|
|
Located in `~/.claude/CLAUDE.md`:
|
||
|
|
```markdown
|
||
|
|
# Core behavioral rules and principles
|
||
|
|
@FLAGS.md # Behavioral flags and triggers
|
||
|
|
@RULES.md # Operational rules and constraints
|
||
|
|
@PRINCIPLES.md # Engineering principles and guidelines
|
||
|
|
@MODE_*.md # Behavioral mode configurations
|
||
|
|
@MCP_*.md # MCP server integrations
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Component Configuration Layer
|
||
|
|
```json
|
||
|
|
{
|
||
|
|
"components": {
|
||
|
|
"core": {
|
||
|
|
"dependencies": [],
|
||
|
|
"category": "core",
|
||
|
|
"enabled": true,
|
||
|
|
"config": {
|
||
|
|
"validation_level": "standard",
|
||
|
|
"error_tolerance": "low"
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
},
|
||
|
|
"mcp": {
|
||
|
|
"dependencies": ["core"],
|
||
|
|
"category": "integration",
|
||
|
|
"enabled": true,
|
||
|
|
"config": {
|
||
|
|
"servers": ["context7", "sequential"],
|
||
|
|
"fallback": "websearch",
|
||
|
|
"timeout": 30
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Flag Configuration System
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Flag Categories and Priority
|
||
|
|
```yaml
|
||
|
|
flag_priorities:
|
||
|
|
critical: 100 # --safe-mode, --validate
|
||
|
|
mode_control: 80 # --brainstorm, --orchestrate
|
||
|
|
mcp_control: 60 # --seq, --magic, --no-mcp
|
||
|
|
analysis_depth: 40 # --think, --think-hard, --ultrathink
|
||
|
|
optimization: 20 # --uc, --parallel, --focus
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
conflict_resolution:
|
||
|
|
safety_first: "--safe-mode overrides all optimization"
|
||
|
|
explicit_override: "user flags > auto-detection"
|
||
|
|
depth_hierarchy: "--ultrathink > --think-hard > --think"
|
||
|
|
mcp_override: "--no-mcp overrides individual MCP flags"
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Custom Flag Configuration
|
||
|
|
```python
|
||
|
|
class CustomFlag:
|
||
|
|
def __init__(self, name, triggers, behavior, priority):
|
||
|
|
self.name = name
|
||
|
|
self.triggers = triggers # List of trigger patterns
|
||
|
|
self.behavior = behavior # Behavioral modifications
|
||
|
|
self.priority = priority # Conflict resolution priority
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def should_activate(self, input_text, context):
|
||
|
|
return any(trigger.match(input_text, context) for trigger in self.triggers)
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Performance Configuration
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Resource Management Settings
|
||
|
|
```yaml
|
||
|
|
performance_config:
|
||
|
|
resource_thresholds:
|
||
|
|
green_zone: 0.75 # Full capabilities
|
||
|
|
yellow_zone: 0.85 # Efficiency mode
|
||
|
|
red_zone: 0.95 # Essential only
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
concurrency_limits:
|
||
|
|
max_parallel_tasks: 15
|
||
|
|
max_mcp_servers: 6
|
||
|
|
max_agent_coordination: 3
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
optimization_settings:
|
||
|
|
token_efficiency_threshold: 0.75
|
||
|
|
batch_operation_minimum: 3
|
||
|
|
parallel_execution_minimum: 3
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Mode Configuration
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Each behavioral mode has dedicated configuration:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
```yaml
|
||
|
|
# MODE_Orchestration.md configuration
|
||
|
|
orchestration_config:
|
||
|
|
activation_triggers:
|
||
|
|
- "multi_tool_operations"
|
||
|
|
- "performance_constraints > 0.75"
|
||
|
|
- "parallel_opportunities > 3"
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
tool_selection_matrix:
|
||
|
|
ui_components: ["magic_mcp", "manual_coding"]
|
||
|
|
deep_analysis: ["sequential_mcp", "native_reasoning"]
|
||
|
|
symbol_operations: ["serena_mcp", "manual_search"]
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
resource_zones:
|
||
|
|
green: {capabilities: "full", verbosity: "normal"}
|
||
|
|
yellow: {capabilities: "selective", verbosity: "reduced"}
|
||
|
|
red: {capabilities: "essential", verbosity: "minimal"}
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Extensibility
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
SuperClaude's architecture is designed for **modular extensibility** with well-defined interfaces and plugin patterns.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Extension Architecture
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
Extension Framework
|
||
|
|
├─ Component Extensions (New component types)
|
||
|
|
├─ Agent Extensions (New specialized agents)
|
||
|
|
├─ MCP Extensions (New MCP server integrations)
|
||
|
|
├─ Mode Extensions (New behavioral modes)
|
||
|
|
├─ Command Extensions (New slash commands)
|
||
|
|
└─ Quality Extensions (New validation rules)
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Component Extension Pattern
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Creating New Components
|
||
|
|
```python
|
||
|
|
from setup.core.base import Component
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
class CustomComponent(Component):
|
||
|
|
def get_metadata(self):
|
||
|
|
return {
|
||
|
|
"name": "custom-component",
|
||
|
|
"description": "Custom functionality",
|
||
|
|
"category": "extension",
|
||
|
|
"version": "1.0.0"
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def get_dependencies(self):
|
||
|
|
return ["core"] # Required dependencies
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def validate_prerequisites(self):
|
||
|
|
# Custom validation logic
|
||
|
|
return True, []
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def install(self, config):
|
||
|
|
# Installation implementation
|
||
|
|
return True
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def validate_installation(self):
|
||
|
|
# Post-install validation
|
||
|
|
return True, []
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Component Registration
|
||
|
|
Components are auto-discovered through the registry system:
|
||
|
|
```python
|
||
|
|
# Components placed in setup/components/ are automatically discovered
|
||
|
|
registry = ComponentRegistry(Path("setup/components"))
|
||
|
|
registry.discover_components()
|
||
|
|
components = registry.list_components() # Includes custom components
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Agent Extension Pattern
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Creating Specialized Agents
|
||
|
|
```yaml
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
name: custom-specialist
|
||
|
|
description: "Specialized domain expert for custom functionality"
|
||
|
|
category: domain-expert
|
||
|
|
tools: Read, Write, Bash, CustomTool
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Custom Specialist Agent
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Triggers
|
||
|
|
- Domain-specific keywords and patterns
|
||
|
|
- Custom task requirements
|
||
|
|
- Specialized analysis needs
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Behavioral Mindset
|
||
|
|
Specialized focus on custom domain with deep expertise and optimization patterns.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Focus Areas
|
||
|
|
- Custom domain analysis
|
||
|
|
- Specialized pattern recognition
|
||
|
|
- Domain-specific optimization
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Key Actions
|
||
|
|
1. Domain Analysis
|
||
|
|
2. Pattern Application
|
||
|
|
3. Optimization Implementation
|
||
|
|
4. Quality Validation
|
||
|
|
5. Knowledge Transfer
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Outputs
|
||
|
|
- Domain-specific analysis
|
||
|
|
- Specialized implementations
|
||
|
|
- Optimization recommendations
|
||
|
|
- Pattern documentation
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### MCP Server Extension
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Custom MCP Integration
|
||
|
|
```python
|
||
|
|
class CustomMCPIntegration:
|
||
|
|
def __init__(self, server_config):
|
||
|
|
self.server_config = server_config
|
||
|
|
self.capabilities = self._discover_capabilities()
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def get_triggers(self):
|
||
|
|
return [
|
||
|
|
"custom_domain_keywords",
|
||
|
|
"specialized_task_patterns",
|
||
|
|
"domain_specific_flags"
|
||
|
|
]
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def should_activate(self, task_analysis):
|
||
|
|
return any(trigger in task_analysis.keywords
|
||
|
|
for trigger in self.get_triggers())
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def coordinate_with(self, other_servers):
|
||
|
|
# Define coordination patterns with existing MCP servers
|
||
|
|
return {
|
||
|
|
'sequential': 'analysis_provider',
|
||
|
|
'context7': 'pattern_consumer',
|
||
|
|
'serena': 'memory_integration'
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Mode Extension Pattern
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Custom Behavioral Mode
|
||
|
|
```python
|
||
|
|
class CustomMode:
|
||
|
|
def __init__(self):
|
||
|
|
self.name = "custom-mode"
|
||
|
|
self.activation_triggers = [
|
||
|
|
"custom_keywords",
|
||
|
|
"specific_context_patterns",
|
||
|
|
"domain_flags"
|
||
|
|
]
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def should_activate(self, context):
|
||
|
|
return self._analyze_triggers(context)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def modify_behavior(self, base_behavior):
|
||
|
|
return {
|
||
|
|
**base_behavior,
|
||
|
|
'specialized_processing': True,
|
||
|
|
'custom_validation': self._custom_validation,
|
||
|
|
'domain_optimization': self._domain_optimization
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Command Extension
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Custom Slash Command
|
||
|
|
```yaml
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
name: custom-command
|
||
|
|
description: "Custom specialized command for domain-specific tasks"
|
||
|
|
category: domain
|
||
|
|
complexity: advanced
|
||
|
|
mcp-servers: [custom-mcp, sequential]
|
||
|
|
personas: [custom-specialist, quality-engineer]
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# /sc:custom - Custom Command
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Triggers
|
||
|
|
- Domain-specific requirements
|
||
|
|
- Specialized task patterns
|
||
|
|
- Custom workflow needs
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Usage
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
/sc:custom [target] [--custom-flag] [--domain-specific]
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Behavioral Flow
|
||
|
|
1. Domain Analysis
|
||
|
|
2. Specialized Processing
|
||
|
|
3. Custom Validation
|
||
|
|
4. Integration Testing
|
||
|
|
5. Documentation Generation
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Quality Extension
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Custom Validation Rules
|
||
|
|
```python
|
||
|
|
class CustomQualityGate:
|
||
|
|
def __init__(self, standards):
|
||
|
|
self.standards = standards
|
||
|
|
self.validation_rules = self._load_custom_rules()
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def validate(self, component, context):
|
||
|
|
results = []
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
for rule in self.validation_rules:
|
||
|
|
result = rule.validate(component, context)
|
||
|
|
results.append(result)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
return self._aggregate_results(results)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def _load_custom_rules(self):
|
||
|
|
# Load domain-specific validation rules
|
||
|
|
return [
|
||
|
|
CustomRule1(),
|
||
|
|
CustomRule2(),
|
||
|
|
DomainSpecificRule()
|
||
|
|
]
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Technical Reference
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### APIs and Interfaces
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Component Interface
|
||
|
|
```python
|
||
|
|
class Component(ABC):
|
||
|
|
@abstractmethod
|
||
|
|
def get_metadata(self) -> Dict[str, str]:
|
||
|
|
"""Return component metadata"""
|
||
|
|
pass
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
@abstractmethod
|
||
|
|
def get_dependencies(self) -> List[str]:
|
||
|
|
"""Return list of dependency component names"""
|
||
|
|
pass
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
@abstractmethod
|
||
|
|
def validate_prerequisites(self) -> Tuple[bool, List[str]]:
|
||
|
|
"""Validate system prerequisites"""
|
||
|
|
pass
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
@abstractmethod
|
||
|
|
def install(self, config: Dict[str, Any]) -> bool:
|
||
|
|
"""Install the component"""
|
||
|
|
pass
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
@abstractmethod
|
||
|
|
def validate_installation(self) -> Tuple[bool, List[str]]:
|
||
|
|
"""Validate successful installation"""
|
||
|
|
pass
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Registry Interface
|
||
|
|
```python
|
||
|
|
class ComponentRegistry:
|
||
|
|
def discover_components(self, force_reload: bool = False) -> None
|
||
|
|
def get_component_class(self, component_name: str) -> Optional[Type[Component]]
|
||
|
|
def resolve_dependencies(self, component_names: List[str]) -> List[str]
|
||
|
|
def get_installation_order(self, component_names: List[str]) -> List[List[str]]
|
||
|
|
def validate_dependency_graph(self) -> List[str]
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Installer Interface
|
||
|
|
```python
|
||
|
|
class Installer:
|
||
|
|
def register_component(self, component: Component) -> None
|
||
|
|
def resolve_dependencies(self, component_names: List[str]) -> List[str]
|
||
|
|
def validate_system_requirements(self) -> Tuple[bool, List[str]]
|
||
|
|
def install_components(self, component_names: List[str], config: Dict[str, Any]) -> bool
|
||
|
|
def create_backup(self) -> Optional[Path]
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Implementation Details
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Flag Processing Algorithm
|
||
|
|
```python
|
||
|
|
def process_flags(input_text, context, user_flags):
|
||
|
|
detected_flags = detect_automatic_flags(input_text, context)
|
||
|
|
combined_flags = merge_flags(detected_flags, user_flags)
|
||
|
|
resolved_flags = resolve_conflicts(combined_flags)
|
||
|
|
return apply_priority_rules(resolved_flags)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def detect_automatic_flags(input_text, context):
|
||
|
|
flags = []
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Complexity analysis
|
||
|
|
if count_files(context) > 3:
|
||
|
|
flags.append('task-manage')
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Resource analysis
|
||
|
|
if context.resource_usage > 0.75:
|
||
|
|
flags.append('token-efficient')
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Domain analysis
|
||
|
|
if 'ui' in input_text.lower():
|
||
|
|
flags.append('magic')
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
return flags
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Resource Management Algorithm
|
||
|
|
```python
|
||
|
|
class ResourceManager:
|
||
|
|
def __init__(self):
|
||
|
|
self.thresholds = {
|
||
|
|
'green': 0.75,
|
||
|
|
'yellow': 0.85,
|
||
|
|
'red': 0.95
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def get_resource_zone(self, usage_metrics):
|
||
|
|
total_usage = self._calculate_total_usage(usage_metrics)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if total_usage <= self.thresholds['green']:
|
||
|
|
return 'green'
|
||
|
|
elif total_usage <= self.thresholds['yellow']:
|
||
|
|
return 'yellow'
|
||
|
|
else:
|
||
|
|
return 'red'
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def adapt_execution_strategy(self, zone, task_requirements):
|
||
|
|
strategies = {
|
||
|
|
'green': FullCapabilityStrategy(),
|
||
|
|
'yellow': EfficiencyStrategy(),
|
||
|
|
'red': EssentialOnlyStrategy()
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
return strategies[zone].adapt(task_requirements)
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Quality Assessment Framework
|
||
|
|
```python
|
||
|
|
class QualityFramework:
|
||
|
|
def __init__(self):
|
||
|
|
self.gates = [
|
||
|
|
PreExecutionGate(),
|
||
|
|
ExecutionMonitoringGate(),
|
||
|
|
PostExecutionGate()
|
||
|
|
]
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def assess_quality(self, component, phase):
|
||
|
|
gate = self._get_gate_for_phase(phase)
|
||
|
|
assessment = gate.assess(component)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
return QualityAssessment(
|
||
|
|
score=assessment.score,
|
||
|
|
passes_gate=assessment.score >= gate.threshold,
|
||
|
|
recommendations=assessment.recommendations,
|
||
|
|
required_actions=assessment.required_actions
|
||
|
|
)
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Performance Metrics
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Key Performance Indicators
|
||
|
|
```yaml
|
||
|
|
performance_metrics:
|
||
|
|
orchestration_efficiency:
|
||
|
|
parallel_task_ratio: "> 0.6" # 60%+ tasks run in parallel
|
||
|
|
resource_utilization: "0.7-0.85" # Optimal resource usage
|
||
|
|
coordination_overhead: "< 0.1" # <10% overhead from coordination
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
quality_metrics:
|
||
|
|
validation_pass_rate: "> 0.95" # 95%+ pass validation gates
|
||
|
|
error_recovery_rate: "> 0.9" # 90%+ successful error recovery
|
||
|
|
completion_rate: "> 0.98" # 98%+ successful task completion
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
efficiency_metrics:
|
||
|
|
token_efficiency_gain: "0.3-0.5" # 30-50% token reduction
|
||
|
|
execution_time_improvement: "> 0.4" # 40%+ faster execution
|
||
|
|
cache_hit_rate: "> 0.8" # 80%+ cache utilization
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Monitoring and Observability
|
||
|
|
```python
|
||
|
|
class PerformanceMonitor:
|
||
|
|
def collect_metrics(self, execution_context):
|
||
|
|
return ExecutionMetrics(
|
||
|
|
parallel_ratio=self._calculate_parallel_ratio(execution_context),
|
||
|
|
resource_efficiency=self._measure_resource_efficiency(execution_context),
|
||
|
|
quality_score=self._assess_quality_score(execution_context),
|
||
|
|
token_efficiency=self._measure_token_efficiency(execution_context)
|
||
|
|
)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def generate_performance_report(self, metrics_history):
|
||
|
|
return PerformanceReport(
|
||
|
|
trends=self._analyze_trends(metrics_history),
|
||
|
|
bottlenecks=self._identify_bottlenecks(metrics_history),
|
||
|
|
optimization_opportunities=self._find_optimizations(metrics_history),
|
||
|
|
recommendations=self._generate_recommendations(metrics_history)
|
||
|
|
)
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Conclusion
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
SuperClaude's technical architecture implements a sophisticated orchestration system that intelligently coordinates between detection, routing, execution, and validation layers. The modular design enables extensive customization while maintaining quality and performance standards.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Key architectural strengths:
|
||
|
|
- **Intelligent Adaptation**: Automatic optimization based on task complexity and resource constraints
|
||
|
|
- **Quality-First Design**: Comprehensive validation gates ensure consistent high-quality outcomes
|
||
|
|
- **Extensible Framework**: Well-defined interfaces enable easy extension and customization
|
||
|
|
- **Performance Optimization**: Resource-aware execution with parallel processing and efficiency optimizations
|
||
|
|
- **Coordinated Expertise**: Multi-agent coordination with specialized domain knowledge
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
This architecture provides a robust foundation for complex AI-assisted development workflows while remaining accessible for customization and extension by advanced users and contributors.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Related Guides
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**🚀 Prerequisites (Start Here First)**
|
||
|
|
- [Installation Guide](installation-guide.md) - Ensure complete installation for architecture exploration
|
||
|
|
- [SuperClaude User Guide](superclaude-user-guide.md) - High-level architecture concepts
|
||
|
|
- [Examples Cookbook](examples-cookbook.md) - See the architecture in action
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**📚 User-Facing Architecture (Understanding the Surface)**
|
||
|
|
- [Commands Guide](commands-guide.md) - Command processing and routing system
|
||
|
|
- [Agents Guide](agents-guide.md) - Agent coordination and selection algorithms
|
||
|
|
- [Behavioral Modes Guide](behavioral-modes-guide.md) - Mode detection and activation system
|
||
|
|
- [Session Management Guide](session-management.md) - Memory and persistence architecture
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**⚙️ Implementation Details (Power Users)**
|
||
|
|
- [Flags Guide](flags-guide.md) - Flag processing and conflict resolution algorithms
|
||
|
|
- [Best Practices Guide](best-practices.md) - Optimization patterns and performance techniques
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**🔧 Practical Application**
|
||
|
|
- [Troubleshooting Guide](troubleshooting-guide.md) - Understanding failure modes and diagnostics
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**📖 Recommended Reading Path:**
|
||
|
|
1. [SuperClaude User Guide](superclaude-user-guide.md) - Conceptual foundation
|
||
|
|
2. [Commands Guide](commands-guide.md) - User interface layer understanding
|
||
|
|
3. This guide's [Architecture Overview](#architecture-overview) - System design
|
||
|
|
4. [Detection Engine](#detection-engine) and [Routing Intelligence](#routing-intelligence) - Core algorithms
|
||
|
|
5. [Extensibility](#extensibility) - Customization and contribution opportunities
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**🎯 Use This Guide For:**
|
||
|
|
- **Contributors**: Understanding system design for feature development
|
||
|
|
- **Advanced Users**: Customization and optimization strategies
|
||
|
|
- **Troubleshooting**: Deep understanding of system behavior
|
||
|
|
- **Integration**: Building extensions and custom components
|