Files
SnapOtter/.github/pull_request_template.md
T
SnapOtter fa50266ea4 fix: address review issues in contribution infrastructure
- CODEOWNERS: use @snapotter-hq username instead of non-existent team
- PR template: use absolute URLs (relative links break in PR body)
- CLA: strengthen entity definition with successor/assignee clause
- CLA workflow: store signatures on dedicated branch, add owner to allowlist
- CONTRIBUTING: clarify approval means the "approved" label, reword CCLA
- Bug template: allow "running from source" for developer contributors
2026-05-16 16:08:16 +08:00

30 lines
1.0 KiB
Markdown

## What does this PR do?
<!-- 1-2 sentences. Link to the related issue if applicable. -->
Fixes #
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
- [ ] New translation or i18n update
- [ ] Documentation update
- [ ] Test improvement
- [ ] Refactor (no functional change)
## Checklist
- [ ] I have read [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/snapotter-hq/snapotter/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
- [ ] I have signed the [CLA](https://github.com/snapotter-hq/snapotter/blob/main/CLA.md) (the bot will prompt you if not)
- [ ] My changes follow the project's code style (Biome passes)
- [ ] I have added or updated tests for my changes
- [ ] All existing tests pass locally (`pnpm test`)
- [ ] TypeScript compiles without errors (`pnpm typecheck`)
- [ ] My PR is focused on a single concern (under 400 lines of change)
- [ ] I have not modified CI, release, or linter configuration files
## Screenshots (if applicable)
<!-- For UI changes, include before/after screenshots. -->