* fix(bmm): improve sprint-status validation and epic status handling - Add status validation with interactive correction for unknown values - Update epic statuses to match state machine: backlog, in-progress, done - Map legacy "contexted" status to "in-progress" explicitly - Add retrospective status counting (optional, completed) - Rewrite risk detection rules for LLM clarity - Fix warnings vs risks naming inconsistency in data mode Closes #1106 Closes #1118 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * style: fix prettier formatting in sprint-status instructions 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
7.8 KiB
Sprint Status - Multi-Mode Service
The workflow execution engine is governed by: {project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/workflow.xml You MUST have already loaded and processed: {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/sprint-status/workflow.yaml Modes: interactive (default), validate, data ⚠️ ABSOLUTELY NO TIME ESTIMATES. Do NOT mention hours, days, weeks, or timelines.
Set mode = {{mode}} if provided by caller; otherwise mode = "interactive" Jump to Step 20 Jump to Step 30 Continue to Step 1 Try {sprint_status_file} ❌ sprint-status.yaml not found. Run `/bmad:bmm:workflows:sprint-planning` to generate it, then rerun sprint-status. Exit workflow Continue to Step 2 Read the FULL file: {sprint_status_file} Parse fields: generated, project, project_key, tracking_system, story_location Parse development_status map. Classify keys: - Epics: keys starting with "epic-" (and not ending with "-retrospective") - Retrospectives: keys ending with "-retrospective" - Stories: everything else (e.g., 1-2-login-form) Map legacy story status "drafted" → "ready-for-dev" Count story statuses: backlog, ready-for-dev, in-progress, review, done Map legacy epic status "contexted" → "in-progress" Count epic statuses: backlog, in-progress, done Count retrospective statuses: optional, completedValidate all statuses against known values:
-
Valid story statuses: backlog, ready-for-dev, in-progress, review, done, drafted (legacy)
-
Valid epic statuses: backlog, in-progress, done, contexted (legacy)
-
Valid retrospective statuses: optional, completed
⚠️ Unknown status detected: {{#each invalid_entries}}
{{key}}: "{{status}}" (not recognized) {{/each}}
Valid statuses:
- Stories: backlog, ready-for-dev, in-progress, review, done
- Epics: backlog, in-progress, done
- Retrospectives: optional, completed How should these be corrected? {{#each invalid_entries}} {{@index}}. {{key}}: "{{status}}" → [select valid status] {{/each}}
Enter corrections (e.g., "1=in-progress, 2=backlog") or "skip" to continue without fixing: Update sprint-status.yaml with corrected values Re-parse the file with corrected statuses
Detect risks:
- IF any story has status "review": suggest
/bmad:bmm:workflows:code-review - IF any story has status "in-progress" AND no stories have status "ready-for-dev": recommend staying focused on active story
- IF all epics have status "backlog" AND no stories have status "ready-for-dev": prompt
/bmad:bmm:workflows:create-story
- Project: {{project}} ({{project_key}})
- Tracking: {{tracking_system}}
- Status file: {sprint_status_file}
Stories: backlog {{count_backlog}}, ready-for-dev {{count_ready}}, in-progress {{count_in_progress}}, review {{count_review}}, done {{count_done}}
Epics: backlog {{epic_backlog}}, in-progress {{epic_in_progress}}, done {{epic_done}}
Next Recommendation: /bmad:bmm:workflows:{{next_workflow_id}} ({{next_story_id}})
{{#if risks}} Risks: {{#each risks}}
- {{this}} {{/each}} {{/if}}
{{#if by_epic}} Per Epic: {{#each by_epic}}
- {{epic_id}}: context={{context_status}}, stories → backlog {{backlog}}, ready {{ready_for_dev}}, in-progress {{in_progress}}, review {{review}}, done {{done}} {{/each}} {{/if}}