- Installation path is now fully configurable, allowing users to specify custom installation directories during setup
- Default installation location changed to .bmad (hidden directory) for cleaner project root organization
Web Bundle Improvements:
- All web bundles (single agent and team) now include party mode support for multi-agent collaboration!
- Advanced elicitation capabilities integrated into standalone agents
- All bundles enhanced with party mode agent manifests
- Added default-party.csv files to bmm, bmgd, and cis module teams
- The default party file is what will be used with single agent bundles. teams can customize for different party configurations before web bundling through a setting in the team yaml file
- New web bundle outputs for all agents (analyst, architect, dev, pm, sm, tea, tech-writer, ux-designer, game-*, creative-squad)
Phase 4 Workflow Updates (In Progress):
- Initiated shift to separate phase 4 implementation artifacts from documentation
- Phase 4 implementation artifacts (stories, code review, sprint plan, context files) will move to dedicated location outside docs folder
- Installer questions and configuration added for artifact path selection
- Updated workflow.yaml files for code-review, sprint-planning, story-context, epic-tech-context, and retrospective workflows to support this, but still might require some udpates
Additional Changes:
- New agent and action command header models for standardization
- Enhanced web-bundle-activation-steps fragment
- Updated web-bundler.js to support new structure
- VS Code settings updated for new .bmad directory
- Party mode instructions and workflow enhanced for better orchestration
IDE Installer Updates:
- Show version number of installer in cli
- improved Installer UX
- Gemini TOML Improved to have clear loading instructions with @ commands
- All tools agent launcher mds improved to use a central file template critical indication isntead of hardcoding in 2 different locations.
1.9 KiB
Implementation Readiness Assessment Report
Date: {{date}} Project: {{project_name}} Assessed By: {{user_name}} Assessment Type: Phase 3 to Phase 4 Transition Validation
Executive Summary
{{readiness_assessment}}
Project Context
{{project_context}}
Document Inventory
Documents Reviewed
{{document_inventory}}
Document Analysis Summary
{{document_analysis}}
Alignment Validation Results
Cross-Reference Analysis
{{alignment_validation}}
Gap and Risk Analysis
Critical Findings
{{gap_risk_analysis}}
UX and Special Concerns
{{ux_validation}}
Detailed Findings
🔴 Critical Issues
Must be resolved before proceeding to implementation
{{critical_issues}}
🟠 High Priority Concerns
Should be addressed to reduce implementation risk
{{high_priority_concerns}}
🟡 Medium Priority Observations
Consider addressing for smoother implementation
{{medium_priority_observations}}
🟢 Low Priority Notes
Minor items for consideration
{{low_priority_notes}}
Positive Findings
✅ Well-Executed Areas
{{positive_findings}}
Recommendations
Immediate Actions Required
{{immediate_actions}}
Suggested Improvements
{{suggested_improvements}}
Sequencing Adjustments
{{sequencing_adjustments}}
Readiness Decision
Overall Assessment: {{overall_readiness_status}}
{{readiness_rationale}}
Conditions for Proceeding (if applicable)
{{conditions_for_proceeding}}
Next Steps
{{recommended_next_steps}}
Workflow Status Update
{{status_update_result}}
Appendices
A. Validation Criteria Applied
{{validation_criteria_used}}
B. Traceability Matrix
{{traceability_matrix}}
C. Risk Mitigation Strategies
{{risk_mitigation_strategies}}
This readiness assessment was generated using the BMad Method Implementation Ready Check workflow (v6-alpha)