Brian Madison 7eb52520fa Major Enhancements:
- Installation path is now fully configurable, allowing users to specify custom installation directories during setup
  - Default installation location changed to .bmad (hidden directory) for cleaner project root organization

    Web Bundle Improvements:

    - All web bundles (single agent and team) now include party mode support for multi-agent collaboration!
    - Advanced elicitation capabilities integrated into standalone agents
    - All bundles enhanced with party mode agent manifests
    - Added default-party.csv files to bmm, bmgd, and cis module teams
    - The default party file is what will be used with single agent bundles. teams can customize for different party configurations before web bundling through a setting in the team yaml file
    - New web bundle outputs for all agents (analyst, architect, dev, pm, sm, tea, tech-writer, ux-designer, game-*, creative-squad)

    Phase 4 Workflow Updates (In Progress):

    - Initiated shift to separate phase 4 implementation artifacts from documentation
        - Phase 4 implementation artifacts (stories, code review, sprint plan, context files) will move to dedicated location outside docs folder
        - Installer questions and configuration added for artifact path selection
        - Updated workflow.yaml files for code-review, sprint-planning, story-context, epic-tech-context, and retrospective workflows to support this, but still might require some udpates

    Additional Changes:

    - New agent and action command header models for standardization
    - Enhanced web-bundle-activation-steps fragment
    - Updated web-bundler.js to support new structure
    - VS Code settings updated for new .bmad directory
    - Party mode instructions and workflow enhanced for better orchestration

   IDE Installer Updates:

    - Show version number of installer in cli
    - improved Installer UX
    - Gemini TOML Improved to have clear loading instructions with @ commands
    - All tools agent launcher mds improved to use a central file template critical indication isntead of hardcoding in 2 different locations.
2025-11-09 17:39:05 -06:00

1.9 KiB

Implementation Readiness Assessment Report

Date: {{date}} Project: {{project_name}} Assessed By: {{user_name}} Assessment Type: Phase 3 to Phase 4 Transition Validation


Executive Summary

{{readiness_assessment}}


Project Context

{{project_context}}


Document Inventory

Documents Reviewed

{{document_inventory}}

Document Analysis Summary

{{document_analysis}}


Alignment Validation Results

Cross-Reference Analysis

{{alignment_validation}}


Gap and Risk Analysis

Critical Findings

{{gap_risk_analysis}}


UX and Special Concerns

{{ux_validation}}


Detailed Findings

🔴 Critical Issues

Must be resolved before proceeding to implementation

{{critical_issues}}

🟠 High Priority Concerns

Should be addressed to reduce implementation risk

{{high_priority_concerns}}

🟡 Medium Priority Observations

Consider addressing for smoother implementation

{{medium_priority_observations}}

🟢 Low Priority Notes

Minor items for consideration

{{low_priority_notes}}


Positive Findings

Well-Executed Areas

{{positive_findings}}


Recommendations

Immediate Actions Required

{{immediate_actions}}

Suggested Improvements

{{suggested_improvements}}

Sequencing Adjustments

{{sequencing_adjustments}}


Readiness Decision

Overall Assessment: {{overall_readiness_status}}

{{readiness_rationale}}

Conditions for Proceeding (if applicable)

{{conditions_for_proceeding}}


Next Steps

{{recommended_next_steps}}

Workflow Status Update

{{status_update_result}}


Appendices

A. Validation Criteria Applied

{{validation_criteria_used}}

B. Traceability Matrix

{{traceability_matrix}}

C. Risk Mitigation Strategies

{{risk_mitigation_strategies}}


This readiness assessment was generated using the BMad Method Implementation Ready Check workflow (v6-alpha)