Brian Madison 7eb52520fa Major Enhancements:
- Installation path is now fully configurable, allowing users to specify custom installation directories during setup
  - Default installation location changed to .bmad (hidden directory) for cleaner project root organization

    Web Bundle Improvements:

    - All web bundles (single agent and team) now include party mode support for multi-agent collaboration!
    - Advanced elicitation capabilities integrated into standalone agents
    - All bundles enhanced with party mode agent manifests
    - Added default-party.csv files to bmm, bmgd, and cis module teams
    - The default party file is what will be used with single agent bundles. teams can customize for different party configurations before web bundling through a setting in the team yaml file
    - New web bundle outputs for all agents (analyst, architect, dev, pm, sm, tea, tech-writer, ux-designer, game-*, creative-squad)

    Phase 4 Workflow Updates (In Progress):

    - Initiated shift to separate phase 4 implementation artifacts from documentation
        - Phase 4 implementation artifacts (stories, code review, sprint plan, context files) will move to dedicated location outside docs folder
        - Installer questions and configuration added for artifact path selection
        - Updated workflow.yaml files for code-review, sprint-planning, story-context, epic-tech-context, and retrospective workflows to support this, but still might require some udpates

    Additional Changes:

    - New agent and action command header models for standardization
    - Enhanced web-bundle-activation-steps fragment
    - Updated web-bundler.js to support new structure
    - VS Code settings updated for new .bmad directory
    - Party mode instructions and workflow enhanced for better orchestration

   IDE Installer Updates:

    - Show version number of installer in cli
    - improved Installer UX
    - Gemini TOML Improved to have clear loading instructions with @ commands
    - All tools agent launcher mds improved to use a central file template critical indication isntead of hardcoding in 2 different locations.
2025-11-09 17:39:05 -06:00

4.1 KiB

Technical Research Report: {{technical_question}}

Date: {{date}} Prepared by: {{user_name}} Project Context: {{project_context}}


Executive Summary

{{recommendations}}

Key Recommendation

Primary Choice: [Technology/Pattern Name]

Rationale: [2-3 sentence summary]

Key Benefits:

  • [Benefit 1]
  • [Benefit 2]
  • [Benefit 3]

1. Research Objectives

Technical Question

{{technical_question}}

Project Context

{{project_context}}

Requirements and Constraints

Functional Requirements

{{functional_requirements}}

Non-Functional Requirements

{{non_functional_requirements}}

Technical Constraints

{{technical_constraints}}


2. Technology Options Evaluated

{{technology_options}}


3. Detailed Technology Profiles

{{#tech_profile_1}}

Option 1: [Technology Name]

{{tech_profile_1}} {{/tech_profile_1}}

{{#tech_profile_2}}

Option 2: [Technology Name]

{{tech_profile_2}} {{/tech_profile_2}}

{{#tech_profile_3}}

Option 3: [Technology Name]

{{tech_profile_3}} {{/tech_profile_3}}

{{#tech_profile_4}}

Option 4: [Technology Name]

{{tech_profile_4}} {{/tech_profile_4}}

{{#tech_profile_5}}

Option 5: [Technology Name]

{{tech_profile_5}} {{/tech_profile_5}}


4. Comparative Analysis

{{comparative_analysis}}

Weighted Analysis

Decision Priorities: {{decision_priorities}}

{{weighted_analysis}}


5. Trade-offs and Decision Factors

{{use_case_fit}}

Key Trade-offs

[Comparison of major trade-offs between top options]


6. Real-World Evidence

{{real_world_evidence}}


7. Architecture Pattern Analysis

{{#architecture_pattern_analysis}} {{architecture_pattern_analysis}} {{/architecture_pattern_analysis}}


8. Recommendations

{{recommendations}}

Implementation Roadmap

  1. Proof of Concept Phase

    • [POC objectives and timeline]
  2. Key Implementation Decisions

    • [Critical decisions to make during implementation]
  3. Migration Path (if applicable)

    • [Migration approach from current state]
  4. Success Criteria

    • [How to validate the decision]

Risk Mitigation

{{risk_mitigation}}


9. Architecture Decision Record (ADR)

{{architecture_decision_record}}


10. References and Resources

Documentation

  • [Links to official documentation]

Benchmarks and Case Studies

  • [Links to benchmarks and real-world case studies]

Community Resources

  • [Links to communities, forums, discussions]

Additional Reading

  • [Links to relevant articles, papers, talks]

Appendices

Appendix A: Detailed Comparison Matrix

[Full comparison table with all evaluated dimensions]

Appendix B: Proof of Concept Plan

[Detailed POC plan if needed]

Appendix C: Cost Analysis

[TCO analysis if performed]


References and Sources

CRITICAL: All technical claims, versions, and benchmarks must be verifiable through sources below

Official Documentation and Release Notes

{{sources_official_docs}}

Performance Benchmarks and Comparisons

{{sources_benchmarks}}

Community Experience and Reviews

{{sources_community}}

Architecture Patterns and Best Practices

{{sources_architecture}}

Additional Technical References

{{sources_additional}}

Version Verification

  • Technologies Researched: {{technology_count}}
  • Versions Verified ({{current_year}}): {{verified_versions_count}}
  • Sources Requiring Update: {{outdated_sources_count}}

Note: All version numbers were verified using current {{current_year}} sources. Versions may change - always verify latest stable release before implementation.


Document Information

Workflow: BMad Research Workflow - Technical Research v2.0 Generated: {{date}} Research Type: Technical/Architecture Research Next Review: [Date for review/update] Total Sources Cited: {{total_sources}}


This technical research report was generated using the BMad Method Research Workflow, combining systematic technology evaluation frameworks with real-time research and analysis. All version numbers and technical claims are backed by current {{current_year}} sources.