- Installation path is now fully configurable, allowing users to specify custom installation directories during setup
- Default installation location changed to .bmad (hidden directory) for cleaner project root organization
Web Bundle Improvements:
- All web bundles (single agent and team) now include party mode support for multi-agent collaboration!
- Advanced elicitation capabilities integrated into standalone agents
- All bundles enhanced with party mode agent manifests
- Added default-party.csv files to bmm, bmgd, and cis module teams
- The default party file is what will be used with single agent bundles. teams can customize for different party configurations before web bundling through a setting in the team yaml file
- New web bundle outputs for all agents (analyst, architect, dev, pm, sm, tea, tech-writer, ux-designer, game-*, creative-squad)
Phase 4 Workflow Updates (In Progress):
- Initiated shift to separate phase 4 implementation artifacts from documentation
- Phase 4 implementation artifacts (stories, code review, sprint plan, context files) will move to dedicated location outside docs folder
- Installer questions and configuration added for artifact path selection
- Updated workflow.yaml files for code-review, sprint-planning, story-context, epic-tech-context, and retrospective workflows to support this, but still might require some udpates
Additional Changes:
- New agent and action command header models for standardization
- Enhanced web-bundle-activation-steps fragment
- Updated web-bundler.js to support new structure
- VS Code settings updated for new .bmad directory
- Party mode instructions and workflow enhanced for better orchestration
IDE Installer Updates:
- Show version number of installer in cli
- improved Installer UX
- Gemini TOML Improved to have clear loading instructions with @ commands
- All tools agent launcher mds improved to use a central file template critical indication isntead of hardcoding in 2 different locations.
4.1 KiB
Technical Research Report: {{technical_question}}
Date: {{date}} Prepared by: {{user_name}} Project Context: {{project_context}}
Executive Summary
{{recommendations}}
Key Recommendation
Primary Choice: [Technology/Pattern Name]
Rationale: [2-3 sentence summary]
Key Benefits:
- [Benefit 1]
- [Benefit 2]
- [Benefit 3]
1. Research Objectives
Technical Question
{{technical_question}}
Project Context
{{project_context}}
Requirements and Constraints
Functional Requirements
{{functional_requirements}}
Non-Functional Requirements
{{non_functional_requirements}}
Technical Constraints
{{technical_constraints}}
2. Technology Options Evaluated
{{technology_options}}
3. Detailed Technology Profiles
{{#tech_profile_1}}
Option 1: [Technology Name]
{{tech_profile_1}} {{/tech_profile_1}}
{{#tech_profile_2}}
Option 2: [Technology Name]
{{tech_profile_2}} {{/tech_profile_2}}
{{#tech_profile_3}}
Option 3: [Technology Name]
{{tech_profile_3}} {{/tech_profile_3}}
{{#tech_profile_4}}
Option 4: [Technology Name]
{{tech_profile_4}} {{/tech_profile_4}}
{{#tech_profile_5}}
Option 5: [Technology Name]
{{tech_profile_5}} {{/tech_profile_5}}
4. Comparative Analysis
{{comparative_analysis}}
Weighted Analysis
Decision Priorities: {{decision_priorities}}
{{weighted_analysis}}
5. Trade-offs and Decision Factors
{{use_case_fit}}
Key Trade-offs
[Comparison of major trade-offs between top options]
6. Real-World Evidence
{{real_world_evidence}}
7. Architecture Pattern Analysis
{{#architecture_pattern_analysis}} {{architecture_pattern_analysis}} {{/architecture_pattern_analysis}}
8. Recommendations
{{recommendations}}
Implementation Roadmap
-
Proof of Concept Phase
- [POC objectives and timeline]
-
Key Implementation Decisions
- [Critical decisions to make during implementation]
-
Migration Path (if applicable)
- [Migration approach from current state]
-
Success Criteria
- [How to validate the decision]
Risk Mitigation
{{risk_mitigation}}
9. Architecture Decision Record (ADR)
{{architecture_decision_record}}
10. References and Resources
Documentation
- [Links to official documentation]
Benchmarks and Case Studies
- [Links to benchmarks and real-world case studies]
Community Resources
- [Links to communities, forums, discussions]
Additional Reading
- [Links to relevant articles, papers, talks]
Appendices
Appendix A: Detailed Comparison Matrix
[Full comparison table with all evaluated dimensions]
Appendix B: Proof of Concept Plan
[Detailed POC plan if needed]
Appendix C: Cost Analysis
[TCO analysis if performed]
References and Sources
CRITICAL: All technical claims, versions, and benchmarks must be verifiable through sources below
Official Documentation and Release Notes
{{sources_official_docs}}
Performance Benchmarks and Comparisons
{{sources_benchmarks}}
Community Experience and Reviews
{{sources_community}}
Architecture Patterns and Best Practices
{{sources_architecture}}
Additional Technical References
{{sources_additional}}
Version Verification
- Technologies Researched: {{technology_count}}
- Versions Verified ({{current_year}}): {{verified_versions_count}}
- Sources Requiring Update: {{outdated_sources_count}}
Note: All version numbers were verified using current {{current_year}} sources. Versions may change - always verify latest stable release before implementation.
Document Information
Workflow: BMad Research Workflow - Technical Research v2.0 Generated: {{date}} Research Type: Technical/Architecture Research Next Review: [Date for review/update] Total Sources Cited: {{total_sources}}
This technical research report was generated using the BMad Method Research Workflow, combining systematic technology evaluation frameworks with real-time research and analysis. All version numbers and technical claims are backed by current {{current_year}} sources.