mirror of
https://github.com/rennf93/roboco.git
synced 2026-08-03 07:23:24 +02:00
* feat(lifecycle): revision findings ledger — structured QA/PR/PM/CEO failure feedback, persisted and delivered down the chain Every bounce used to survive only as flattened prose: rounds overwrote each other in notes_structured, request_changes persisted nothing, two raw dev_notes appends were silently destroyed by the next handoff note, and the dev prompt pointed at fields (qa_notes via evidence(), pm_notes) the API never delivered. Agents re-interpreted and re-discovered every failure before they could start fixing it. - task_review_findings (migration 071, append-only): file/line/severity/ criterion(AC-id-validated)/expected/actual/fix/evidence per finding, with origin (qa|pr_gate|pm|ceo), round, and an open->addressed->verified lifecycle (waived reserved); new tasks.pm_notes + PmReviewContent give request_changes a structured home - producers: fail_review/pr_fail/request_changes take findings=[...] (prose issues shimmed+merged for one release, deprecation-logged); ceo_reject validates its reason (no 500), lands an origin=ceo finding, and bumps round+audit on branchless coordination roots; guardrails at the verb chokepoint (nudge >5, hard reject >10, field caps, traversal-safe file); the dev_notes data-loss appends are removed; new task.request_changes + task.ceo_reject audit events close rework attribution - delivery: qa_notes/pr_reviewer_notes/pm_notes carry the deterministic [F-id8] rendering; claim briefings, evidence(), the REVISION_REQUIRED spawn prompt, PM triage bounced-blocks, and A2A bodies deliver open findings; round-N+1 QA and gate reviewers get the full prior ledger; panel Findings tab + bounced-xN chip; metrics pm_rejects/ceo_rejects + findings counts; vault task notes render a Findings section (fail-open) - resolution closes for every origin: i_am_done and submit_up/submit_root take resolved_findings gated by FINDINGS_ADDRESSED (owner-gated so a stale non-owner PM can never mutate the ledger); pass_review/pr_pass/ complete verify-stamp same-transaction; ceo_approve stamps best-effort - 24 real-DB integration tests drive the full loop through the real choreographer; full suite 12856 green * docs: revision findings ledger sweep — CLAUDE.md, map, RAG corpus - CLAUDE.md: new ledger section + corrected request_changes row - docs/map/review-findings.md (new subsystem map) + surgical updates to task-service/pr-gate-review/metrics-observability/vault/panel maps - docs/rag: producers' findings contract across qa/pr-reviewer/developer/ cell-pm/main-pm/ceo role docs (the PM docs were missing request_changes entirely), verb references, and a new architecture/review-findings.md disambiguating ledger findings from convention findings * test(e2e): resubmit resolves the pr_fail finding per the ledger contract The scripted pr_fail revision loop resubmitted submit_up without resolved_findings — correctly rejected now that FINDINGS_ADDRESSED gates the PM resubmit verbs (green locally, red only in CI since the e2e suite skips without ROBOCO_E2E_SMOKE=1). The scripted PM now reads the open ledger row pr_fail persisted (new open_finding_ids arc helper) and resolves it on resubmit, asserting the open set drains — exercising the coordinator half of the new contract end to end. --------- Co-authored-by: Renn F <rennf93@users.noreply.github.com>
447 lines
17 KiB
Python
447 lines
17 KiB
Python
"""Tests for evidence-payload + context-briefing assembly."""
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
from typing import Any
|
|
from unittest.mock import MagicMock
|
|
from uuid import uuid4
|
|
|
|
from roboco.services.gateway.evidence_builder import (
|
|
BRIEFING_LIST_CAP,
|
|
FINDING_EVIDENCE_EXCERPT_CAP,
|
|
BriefingInputs,
|
|
build_context_briefing,
|
|
build_evidence_for_task,
|
|
build_task_handoff,
|
|
render_findings,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
_EXPECTED_TWO = 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _task(
|
|
*,
|
|
pr_number: int | None = 8,
|
|
pr_url: str | None = "https://github.com/x/y/pull/8",
|
|
commits: list[dict] | None = None,
|
|
dev_notes: str = "did stuff",
|
|
) -> MagicMock:
|
|
t = MagicMock()
|
|
t.id = uuid4()
|
|
t.pr_number = pr_number
|
|
t.pr_url = pr_url
|
|
t.commits = commits or [{"sha": "abc123", "message": "feat: x"}]
|
|
t.dev_notes = dev_notes
|
|
t.acceptance_criteria_status = []
|
|
return t
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestEvidence:
|
|
def test_basic_payload(self) -> None:
|
|
t = _task()
|
|
ev = build_evidence_for_task(
|
|
t, journal_highlights=[], files_changed=["README.md"]
|
|
)
|
|
assert ev.pr_url == "https://github.com/x/y/pull/8"
|
|
assert ev.commits == [{"sha": "abc123", "message": "feat: x"}]
|
|
assert "README.md" in ev.files_changed
|
|
|
|
def test_no_pr_returns_empty_url(self) -> None:
|
|
t = _task(pr_number=None, pr_url=None)
|
|
ev = build_evidence_for_task(t, journal_highlights=[], files_changed=[])
|
|
assert ev.pr_url is None
|
|
assert ev.pr_number is None
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestContextBriefing:
|
|
def test_empty_briefing(self) -> None:
|
|
inputs = BriefingInputs(
|
|
unread_a2a=[],
|
|
unread_mentions=[],
|
|
pending_notifications=[],
|
|
task_metadata_gaps=[],
|
|
recent_team_activity=[],
|
|
blockers_in_my_lane=[],
|
|
)
|
|
b = build_context_briefing(inputs)
|
|
# Empty sections are omitted to keep the per-verb payload compact — an
|
|
# all-empty briefing collapses to {}.
|
|
assert b == {}
|
|
|
|
def test_omits_empty_keeps_nonempty(self) -> None:
|
|
inputs = BriefingInputs(
|
|
unread_a2a=[{"id": "a1"}],
|
|
unread_mentions=[],
|
|
pending_notifications=[],
|
|
task_metadata_gaps=[],
|
|
recent_team_activity=[],
|
|
blockers_in_my_lane=[],
|
|
)
|
|
assert build_context_briefing(inputs) == {"unread_a2a": [{"id": "a1"}]}
|
|
|
|
def test_lists_capped_at_10(self) -> None:
|
|
twenty = [{"i": i} for i in range(20)]
|
|
inputs = BriefingInputs(
|
|
unread_a2a=twenty,
|
|
unread_mentions=twenty,
|
|
pending_notifications=twenty,
|
|
task_metadata_gaps=[],
|
|
recent_team_activity=twenty,
|
|
blockers_in_my_lane=twenty,
|
|
)
|
|
b = build_context_briefing(inputs)
|
|
assert len(b["unread_a2a"]) == BRIEFING_LIST_CAP
|
|
assert len(b["unread_mentions"]) == BRIEFING_LIST_CAP
|
|
assert len(b["pending_notifications"]) == BRIEFING_LIST_CAP
|
|
assert len(b["recent_team_activity"]) == BRIEFING_LIST_CAP
|
|
assert len(b["blockers_in_my_lane"]) == BRIEFING_LIST_CAP
|
|
|
|
def test_task_handoff_defaults_none_and_surfaces_in_briefing(self) -> None:
|
|
inputs = BriefingInputs(
|
|
unread_a2a=[],
|
|
unread_mentions=[],
|
|
pending_notifications=[],
|
|
task_metadata_gaps=[],
|
|
recent_team_activity=[],
|
|
blockers_in_my_lane=[],
|
|
)
|
|
# A None handoff is an empty section → omitted from the briefing.
|
|
assert "task_handoff" not in build_context_briefing(inputs)
|
|
|
|
with_handoff = BriefingInputs(
|
|
unread_a2a=[],
|
|
unread_mentions=[],
|
|
pending_notifications=[],
|
|
task_metadata_gaps=[],
|
|
recent_team_activity=[],
|
|
blockers_in_my_lane=[],
|
|
task_handoff={"pr_number": 8},
|
|
)
|
|
assert build_context_briefing(with_handoff)["task_handoff"] == {"pr_number": 8}
|
|
|
|
def test_company_goals_defaults_none_and_surfaces_in_briefing(self) -> None:
|
|
inputs = BriefingInputs(
|
|
unread_a2a=[],
|
|
unread_mentions=[],
|
|
pending_notifications=[],
|
|
task_metadata_gaps=[],
|
|
recent_team_activity=[],
|
|
blockers_in_my_lane=[],
|
|
)
|
|
# None goals is an empty section → omitted from the briefing.
|
|
assert "company_goals" not in build_context_briefing(inputs)
|
|
|
|
with_goals = BriefingInputs(
|
|
unread_a2a=[],
|
|
unread_mentions=[],
|
|
pending_notifications=[],
|
|
task_metadata_gaps=[],
|
|
recent_team_activity=[],
|
|
blockers_in_my_lane=[],
|
|
company_goals={"north_star": "win"},
|
|
)
|
|
assert build_context_briefing(with_goals)["company_goals"] == {
|
|
"north_star": "win"
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestTaskHandoff:
|
|
def test_none_task_returns_none(self) -> None:
|
|
assert build_task_handoff(None, []) is None
|
|
|
|
def test_no_prior_work_returns_none(self) -> None:
|
|
t = _task(pr_number=None, pr_url=None, dev_notes="")
|
|
t.commits = [] # _task's `commits or [...]` default would re-seed one
|
|
t.acceptance_criteria_status = []
|
|
assert build_task_handoff(t, []) is None
|
|
|
|
def test_digest_from_prior_work(self) -> None:
|
|
pr = 8
|
|
t = _task(
|
|
pr_number=pr,
|
|
commits=[{"sha": "abc", "message": "feat: x"}],
|
|
dev_notes="implemented the parser",
|
|
)
|
|
t.branch_name = "feature/backend/abc"
|
|
t.acceptance_criteria_status = [{"criterion": "parses", "met": True}]
|
|
digest = build_task_handoff(t, [{"summary": "chose recursive descent"}])
|
|
assert digest is not None
|
|
assert digest["pr_number"] == pr
|
|
assert digest["branch_name"] == "feature/backend/abc"
|
|
assert digest["commit_count"] == 1
|
|
assert digest["dev_summary"] == "implemented the parser"
|
|
assert digest["journal_highlights"] == [{"summary": "chose recursive descent"}]
|
|
|
|
def test_surfaces_completed_dependencies(self) -> None:
|
|
dep_id = uuid4()
|
|
t = _task(pr_number=None, pr_url=None, dev_notes="")
|
|
t.commits = []
|
|
t.acceptance_criteria_status = []
|
|
t.completed_dependency_ids = [dep_id]
|
|
digest = build_task_handoff(t, [])
|
|
# A just-unblocked task with no other prior work still surfaces the dep.
|
|
assert digest is not None
|
|
assert digest["completed_dependency_ids"] == [str(dep_id)]
|
|
|
|
def test_caps_lists_and_type_guards(self) -> None:
|
|
thirty = [{"sha": str(i)} for i in range(30)]
|
|
t = _task(pr_number=7, commits=thirty)
|
|
# Non-list / mismatched-type attributes degrade safely, never leak.
|
|
t.acceptance_criteria_status = object()
|
|
t.pr_url = object()
|
|
t.branch_name = None
|
|
not_a_list: Any = object()
|
|
digest = build_task_handoff(t, not_a_list)
|
|
assert digest is not None
|
|
assert len(digest["recent_commits"]) == BRIEFING_LIST_CAP
|
|
assert digest["acceptance_criteria_status"] == []
|
|
assert digest["journal_highlights"] == []
|
|
assert digest["pr_url"] is None
|
|
assert digest["branch_name"] is None
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestPrReviewSurface:
|
|
"""The persisted pr_fail verdict + issues must surface in the PM
|
|
briefing's task_handoff, not just the fire-and-forget a2a."""
|
|
|
|
def test_surfaces_pr_fail_verdict_and_issues(self) -> None:
|
|
t = _task(pr_number=138, commits=[{"sha": "abc", "message": "feat: x"}])
|
|
t.notes_structured = {
|
|
"pr_review": {
|
|
"verdict": "failed",
|
|
"summary": "In-path PR-review gate requested changes.",
|
|
"issues": ["missing null guard", "no test for the edge case"],
|
|
"head_sha": "aaaa1111bbbb2222",
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
digest = build_task_handoff(t, [])
|
|
assert digest is not None
|
|
pr_review = digest["pr_review"]
|
|
assert pr_review["verdict"] == "failed"
|
|
assert pr_review["issues"] == [
|
|
"missing null guard",
|
|
"no test for the edge case",
|
|
]
|
|
assert pr_review["head_sha"] == "aaaa1111bbbb2222"
|
|
|
|
def test_no_pr_review_field_when_none_present(self) -> None:
|
|
t = _task(pr_number=8, commits=[{"sha": "abc", "message": "feat: x"}])
|
|
t.notes_structured = None
|
|
digest = build_task_handoff(t, [])
|
|
assert digest is not None
|
|
# Absent pr_review ⇒ no key (not a None-valued key) so a PM without a
|
|
# prior gate verdict doesn't see a misleading empty slot.
|
|
assert "pr_review" not in digest
|
|
|
|
def test_pr_review_alone_is_prior_work_worth_resuming(self) -> None:
|
|
"""A task with no commits/dev-notes but a prior pr_fail verdict still
|
|
surfaces the handoff so the owning PM reads the change-requests."""
|
|
t = _task(pr_number=None, pr_url=None, dev_notes="")
|
|
t.commits = []
|
|
t.acceptance_criteria_status = []
|
|
t.notes_structured = {
|
|
"pr_review": {"verdict": "failed", "issues": ["fix the off-by-one"]}
|
|
}
|
|
digest = build_task_handoff(t, [])
|
|
assert digest is not None
|
|
assert digest["pr_review"]["issues"] == ["fix the off-by-one"]
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _finding_row(**over: Any) -> MagicMock:
|
|
base: dict[str, Any] = {
|
|
"id": uuid4(),
|
|
"round": 2,
|
|
"origin": "qa",
|
|
"status": "open",
|
|
"severity": "major",
|
|
"file": "roboco/services/task.py",
|
|
"line": 10,
|
|
"expected": "raises on bad input",
|
|
"actual": "swallows the error",
|
|
"fix": "add the raise",
|
|
"evidence": None,
|
|
}
|
|
base.update(over)
|
|
return MagicMock(**base)
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestRenderFindings:
|
|
def test_renders_compact_dict_with_id8_prefix(self) -> None:
|
|
row = _finding_row()
|
|
rendered = render_findings([row])
|
|
assert len(rendered) == 1
|
|
entry = rendered[0]
|
|
assert entry["id"] == str(row.id)[:8]
|
|
assert entry["round"] == row.round
|
|
assert entry["origin"] == "qa"
|
|
assert entry["status"] == "open"
|
|
assert entry["file"] == "roboco/services/task.py"
|
|
assert entry["line"] == row.line
|
|
assert entry["expected"] == "raises on bad input"
|
|
assert entry["actual"] == "swallows the error"
|
|
assert entry["fix"] == "add the raise"
|
|
|
|
def test_none_rows_render_empty(self) -> None:
|
|
assert render_findings(None) == []
|
|
|
|
def test_caps_defensively(self) -> None:
|
|
rows = [_finding_row() for _ in range(BRIEFING_LIST_CAP + 5)]
|
|
assert len(render_findings(rows)) == BRIEFING_LIST_CAP
|
|
|
|
def test_evidence_excerpt_clipped_with_omission_note(self) -> None:
|
|
long_evidence = "x" * (FINDING_EVIDENCE_EXCERPT_CAP + 50)
|
|
row = _finding_row(evidence=long_evidence)
|
|
entry = render_findings([row])[0]
|
|
assert entry["evidence"] is not None
|
|
assert len(entry["evidence"]) < len(long_evidence)
|
|
assert "chars omitted" in entry["evidence"]
|
|
assert entry["evidence"].startswith("x" * FINDING_EVIDENCE_EXCERPT_CAP)
|
|
|
|
def test_short_evidence_is_not_annotated(self) -> None:
|
|
row = _finding_row(evidence="short excerpt")
|
|
entry = render_findings([row])[0]
|
|
assert entry["evidence"] == "short excerpt"
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestEvidencePayloadFindings:
|
|
def test_revision_and_prior_findings_render(self) -> None:
|
|
t = _task()
|
|
open_row = _finding_row(status="open")
|
|
all_row = _finding_row(status="verified", round=1)
|
|
ev = build_evidence_for_task(
|
|
t,
|
|
journal_highlights=[],
|
|
files_changed=[],
|
|
revision_findings=[open_row],
|
|
prior_findings=[open_row, all_row],
|
|
)
|
|
assert len(ev.revision_findings) == 1
|
|
assert ev.revision_findings[0]["status"] == "open"
|
|
assert len(ev.prior_findings) == _EXPECTED_TWO
|
|
|
|
def test_findings_default_empty_no_noise(self) -> None:
|
|
t = _task()
|
|
ev = build_evidence_for_task(t, journal_highlights=[], files_changed=[])
|
|
assert ev.revision_findings == []
|
|
assert ev.prior_findings == []
|
|
|
|
def test_as_dict_omits_empty_findings_lists(self) -> None:
|
|
"""Empty findings lists must not serialize into the envelope at all —
|
|
an absent key reads as 'nothing here', identical to an empty list,
|
|
at zero token cost (matches build_task_handoff's posture)."""
|
|
t = _task()
|
|
ev = build_evidence_for_task(t, journal_highlights=[], files_changed=[])
|
|
body = ev.as_dict()
|
|
assert "revision_findings" not in body
|
|
assert "prior_findings" not in body
|
|
assert "convention_findings" not in body
|
|
# Non-empty EvidencePayload fields (even empty lists like
|
|
# files_changed/commits) are unaffected — only the three findings
|
|
# fields get the omit-when-empty treatment.
|
|
assert "commits" in body
|
|
assert "files_changed" in body
|
|
|
|
def test_as_dict_keeps_non_empty_findings_lists(self) -> None:
|
|
t = _task()
|
|
open_row = _finding_row(status="open")
|
|
ev = build_evidence_for_task(
|
|
t,
|
|
journal_highlights=[],
|
|
files_changed=[],
|
|
revision_findings=[open_row],
|
|
prior_findings=[open_row],
|
|
)
|
|
body = ev.as_dict()
|
|
assert len(body["revision_findings"]) == 1
|
|
assert len(body["prior_findings"]) == 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestTaskHandoffRevisionFindings:
|
|
def test_open_findings_surface_under_revision_findings(self) -> None:
|
|
t = _task(pr_number=8, commits=[{"sha": "abc", "message": "feat: x"}])
|
|
row = _finding_row(status="open", file="api/routes/foo.py", line=17)
|
|
digest = build_task_handoff(t, [], [row])
|
|
assert digest is not None
|
|
assert len(digest["revision_findings"]) == 1
|
|
entry = digest["revision_findings"][0]
|
|
assert entry["file"] == "api/routes/foo.py"
|
|
assert entry["line"] == row.line
|
|
|
|
def test_empty_ledger_is_silent(self) -> None:
|
|
t = _task(pr_number=8, commits=[{"sha": "abc", "message": "feat: x"}])
|
|
digest = build_task_handoff(t, [], [])
|
|
assert digest is not None
|
|
assert "revision_findings" not in digest
|
|
|
|
def test_no_findings_arg_is_silent(self) -> None:
|
|
t = _task(pr_number=8, commits=[{"sha": "abc", "message": "feat: x"}])
|
|
digest = build_task_handoff(t, [])
|
|
assert digest is not None
|
|
assert "revision_findings" not in digest
|
|
|
|
def test_open_findings_alone_is_prior_work_worth_resuming(self) -> None:
|
|
"""A task with no commits/dev-notes but an open finding still
|
|
surfaces the handoff — the bounced dev must see it."""
|
|
t = _task(pr_number=None, pr_url=None, dev_notes="")
|
|
t.commits = []
|
|
t.acceptance_criteria_status = []
|
|
digest = build_task_handoff(t, [], [_finding_row()])
|
|
assert digest is not None
|
|
assert len(digest["revision_findings"]) == 1
|
|
|
|
def test_caps_at_briefing_list_cap(self) -> None:
|
|
t = _task(pr_number=8, commits=[{"sha": "abc", "message": "feat: x"}])
|
|
rows = [_finding_row() for _ in range(BRIEFING_LIST_CAP + 5)]
|
|
digest = build_task_handoff(t, [], rows)
|
|
assert digest is not None
|
|
assert len(digest["revision_findings"]) == BRIEFING_LIST_CAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestExtractQaReview:
|
|
def test_surfaces_verdict_summary_and_findings_count(self) -> None:
|
|
t = _task(pr_number=8, commits=[{"sha": "abc", "message": "feat: x"}])
|
|
t.notes_structured = {
|
|
"qa": {
|
|
"summary": "2 findings, both blocking",
|
|
"verdict": "failed",
|
|
"findings": [{"expected": "x", "actual": "y"}, {"expected": "a"}],
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
digest = build_task_handoff(t, [])
|
|
assert digest is not None
|
|
qa_review = digest["qa_review"]
|
|
assert qa_review["verdict"] == "failed"
|
|
assert qa_review["summary"] == "2 findings, both blocking"
|
|
assert qa_review["findings_count"] == _EXPECTED_TWO
|
|
|
|
def test_absent_when_no_qa_slot(self) -> None:
|
|
t = _task(pr_number=8, commits=[{"sha": "abc", "message": "feat: x"}])
|
|
t.notes_structured = None
|
|
digest = build_task_handoff(t, [])
|
|
assert digest is not None
|
|
assert "qa_review" not in digest
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestExtractPmReview:
|
|
def test_surfaces_summary_and_findings_count_no_verdict(self) -> None:
|
|
t = _task(pr_number=8, commits=[{"sha": "abc", "message": "feat: x"}])
|
|
t.notes_structured = {
|
|
"pm_review": {
|
|
"summary": "merge-review reject",
|
|
"findings": [{"expected": "x", "actual": "y"}],
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
digest = build_task_handoff(t, [])
|
|
assert digest is not None
|
|
pm_review = digest["pm_review"]
|
|
assert pm_review["summary"] == "merge-review reject"
|
|
assert pm_review["findings_count"] == 1
|
|
assert "verdict" not in pm_review
|
|
|
|
def test_absent_when_no_pm_review_slot(self) -> None:
|
|
t = _task(pr_number=8, commits=[{"sha": "abc", "message": "feat: x"}])
|
|
t.notes_structured = {}
|
|
digest = build_task_handoff(t, [])
|
|
assert digest is not None
|
|
assert "pm_review" not in digest
|