mirror of
https://github.com/rennf93/roboco.git
synced 2026-08-03 07:23:24 +02:00
The lifecycle spec (CLAIM_RULES) grants CELL_PM/MAIN_PM claim of NEEDS_REVISION so a rejected coordination root (pr_fail / qa_fail / ceo_reject) can be re-claimed via i_will_plan and re-delegated. The runtime mapping _ROLE_CLAIM_STATUSES omitted it for PMs, so the spec gate allowed i_will_plan on a needs_revision root while the composed claim() rejected it -> returned None -> INVALID_STATE: the PM could neither plan nor idle its own rejected root and respawn-looped (observed live on cell root 0e49e04e, ~143 INVALID_STATE rejections across 11 PM sessions; the tail of the 2026-06-24/25 run). Add NEEDS_REVISION to the cell_pm/main_pm runtime claim statuses, and a parity test locking _ROLE_CLAIM_STATUSES to lifecycle.CLAIM_RULES so the two can't drift again.