mirror of
https://github.com/rennf93/roboco.git
synced 2026-08-03 07:23:24 +02:00
Renn F
60de349934
A panel-wide UI task that asked for the UX/UI and Frontend cells was
decomposed into Backend + Frontend only — the Main PM judged the UI work
collapsible into Frontend and dropped UX/UI entirely. Its prompt gave full
cell discretion ('you decide which cells', 'most roots only touch one
cell') with no rule to honor cells the brief names.
Add a rule: when the brief, acceptance criteria, or PO/HoM handoff
explicitly call for a cell, the Main PM must create a subtask for each
named cell and never collapse one into a neighbour — its discretion covers
only un-named scope; a genuinely-unnecessary named cell must be confirmed
via escalate_up/dm, not silently dropped. Matching anti-pattern added.
The companion finding (cross-dev sequencing) needed no change: the Cell PM
prompt already keeps dependent units in one dev's lane and splits only
independent units, and cross-cell order is enforced by the dependency_ids
gate, not sequence.