Files
roboco/CLAUDE.md
T
547fe444f2 [4865ff8b] Add WebSocket support to the usage dashboard (#115)
* [e7349d84] feat(dashboard): WS usage store, hook extension, status badge, and smooth animations (#111) (#113)

- Add src/store/usage-store.ts with typed UsageData interface, useUsageStore
  Zustand store, setUsageData, clearUsageData, and setWsState actions
- Export useUsageStore and UsageData from store/index.ts
- Extend use-rate-limit-websocket.ts: rename msg type to SystemWsMessage,
  add key_metrics field; add useEffect syncing wsState into useUsageStore;
  add USAGE_UPDATE/USAGE_SNAPSHOT handler dispatching to useUsageStore
  (RATE_LIMIT_HIT/LIFTED handling and onReconnect unchanged)
- Update CommandCenter to read key_metrics from useUsageStore when
  wsState === 'connected' and usageData non-null; falls back to
  useCeoOverview() (refetchInterval: 60000) when WS disconnected
- Update KeyMetricsPanel: add wsState prop, render connection status Badge
  matching AgentStreamViewer pattern (bg-green-500+Wifi / bg-yellow-500+
  Loader2 spin / bg-gray-500+WifiOff); add transition-all duration-300
  ease-in-out to metric value spans for smooth animated updates

Co-authored-by: Frontend Developer 1 <fe-dev-1@agents.roboco.dev>

* [c9745ee8] feat(events): add USAGE_UPDATE/SNAPSHOT event types, throttled publisher, /ws/system usage bridge (#112) (#114)

- Add EventType.USAGE_UPDATE='usage.update' and EventType.USAGE_SNAPSHOT='usage.snapshot'
  to the EventType StrEnum in roboco/models/events.py

- Create roboco/services/usage_events.py with _UsageThrottle class (5-second per-agent
  window using time.monotonic()) and publish_usage_update() / publish_usage_snapshot()
  helpers; lazy imports prevent circular dependency with roboco.events

- Extend orchestrator._sweep_token_snapshots() to publish USAGE_UPDATE per active agent
  (throttled) and a USAGE_SNAPSHOT aggregate after each sweep cycle; wrapped in
  contextlib.suppress so event errors never abort DB snapshot operations

- Add _handle_usage_event() to websocket_bridge.py following _handle_rate_limit_event
  pattern; register USAGE_UPDATE and USAGE_SNAPSHOT subscriptions in
  register_websocket_bridge_handlers() forwarding both to /ws/system via broadcast_system()

- Add unit tests: test_usage_events.py (throttle suppression, publish helpers) and
  test_websocket_bridge.py extended with _handle_usage_event coverage and updated
  registration assertion to include USAGE_UPDATE/USAGE_SNAPSHOT

Co-authored-by: Backend Developer 1 <be-dev-1@agents.roboco.dev>

* fix(usage-ws): reconcile the realtime token/cost contract end-to-end

The backend and frontend halves shipped mismatched contracts, so the usage
dashboard never received live data:

- The bridge forwarded the dotted event value ("usage.update") while the panel
  switched on "USAGE_UPDATE"; map both to the UPPER_SNAKE type string the same
  way the rate-limit handler does.
- The backend emitted token/cost telemetry but the frontend read a key_metrics
  field and fed the org-metrics panel. Rewire the frontend to consume the
  USAGE_SNAPSHOT token/cost payload into the "Token Usage & Cost" panel —
  WS-first with polling fallback and a connection-status badge — and revert the
  unrelated KeyMetricsPanel / CommandCenter wiring.

Backend cleanups in the same path:

- Replace the multi-argument publish helpers with typed UsageUpdate /
  UsageSnapshot payloads, removing the too-many-arguments lint suppressions.
- Extract _fetch_agent_tokens and _persist_token_snapshot from the token sweep,
  removing the too-many-statements suppression; label the live snapshot "live".

Hardening uncovered while fixing the above:

- _finalize_spawn_session pulled the full RAG stack into the
  session-finalization path through a transcript-parse import; move the pure
  parser into a dependency-light roboco.agent_sdk.transcript_usage module so
  finalization never imports the agent SDK server.
- Reduce _finalize_spawn_session complexity by extracting
  _resolve_final_token_usage, and widen the transcript-fallback guard so a read
  error can never abort finalization.

Also align KeyMetricsPanel with the metrics /dashboard/ceo actually returns: it
read velocity_24h / avg_time_to_done / active_agents, none of which
get_key_metrics() emits, so four of five rows rendered "—". Render
velocity_weekly, completion_rate, documentation_coverage and active_blockers.

* docs: note live usage push over /ws/system on the usage dashboard

* fix(usage): finalize on self-exit and de-duplicate transcript token counts

Two bugs left token capture broken even after the transcript-read fallback
landed — surfaced by a live agent run:

- Agents that self-exit (the normal i_am_idle -> container shutdown, exit 0)
  were never finalized. _finalize_spawn_session is only called from
  stop_agent(), but a graceful self-exit goes through _handle_stopped_container,
  which set the instance OFFLINE and returned without finalizing — leaving the
  spawn-session row open with zero tokens. Finalize there for both graceful
  (exit_reason="completed") and crash (exit_reason="crashed") exits.

- sum_transcript_usage double-counted. Claude Code logs one assistant message
  as several JSONL lines (one per content block — thinking / text / tool_use),
  each repeating the same message.usage, so summing every line roughly doubled
  the totals. De-duplicate by message.id.

Verified against a live agent transcript: the raw sum (12, 1068, 62502, 115828)
vs the de-duped (6, 516, 62502, 63336), which matches the session's
authoritative result.usage exactly.

* feat(usage): fall back to the transcript in the live token sweep

The 60s token sweep read only the agent SDK's /usage/status, which races
container teardown and reports zero mid-run — so live usage (and the
USAGE_SNAPSHOT pushed to /ws/system) stayed at zero for active agents.
Extract _resolve_active_tokens: try the SDK, then fall back to the durable
transcript (the same source finalize uses) so running agents report live.

* feat(usage): add GET /usage/sessions for the dashboard's Recent Sessions

The panel's Recent Sessions table was mock-only — the backend had no sessions
endpoint, so production always showed 'No sessions recorded yet'. Add
UsageService.get_recent_sessions + a /usage/sessions route returning the most
recent spawn-session rows (token totals + cost), and point the panel client
at it.

---------

Co-authored-by: Frontend Developer 1 <fe-dev-1@agents.roboco.dev>
Co-authored-by: Backend Developer 1 <be-dev-1@agents.roboco.dev>
Co-authored-by: Renn F <rennf93@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-06-11 23:19:50 +02:00

22 KiB

CLAUDE.md

This file provides guidance to Claude Code (claude.ai/code) when working with code in this repository.

Licensing

RoboCo is licensed under AGPL-3.0 (see LICENSE). Copyright (c) 2026 Renzo Franceschini. Do NOT reintroduce an MIT or other license reference anywhere (README, headers, package metadata) — the project is AGPL.

Contributions require a signed Contributor License Agreement (CLA.md), automated via the CLA Assistant workflow (.github/workflows/cla.yml). The CLA preserves the option to dual-license / offer a commercial edition later; keep copyright assignment language intact. See CONTRIBUTING.md.

Project Overview

RoboCo is an AI Agentic Company - a virtual organization of 20 AI agents + 1 human CEO, designed to operate as a complete software development workforce. The system implements a structured organizational hierarchy with formal communication protocols, task management, and quality controls.

Core Architecture

CEO (Renzo - Human)
    |
    +-- Intake (on-demand interviewer: chats only with the CEO to draft a task)
    |
    +-- Board (3 agents)
         +-- Product Owner
         +-- Head of Marketing
         +-- Auditor (silent observer, reports to CEO)
              |
              +-- Main PM (coordinates all cells)
                   |
                   +-- Backend Cell (5 agents: 2 Devs, 1 QA, 1 PM, 1 Documenter)
                   +-- Frontend Cell (5 agents: 2 Devs, 1 QA, 1 PM, 1 Documenter)
                   +-- UX/UI Cell (5 agents: 2 Devs, 1 QA, 1 PM, 1 Documenter)

Hardware Infrastructure

  • Olares One (Powerhouse): Intel Ultra 9 + RTX 5090, runs Claude Code instances and AI inference - NOT YET ARRIVED
  • UGREEN NAS (Warehouse): 36TB RAID6, 128GB RAM, hosts PostgreSQL, Redis
  • Pi Cluster (Operations): Monitoring, notifications, smart home

Development Standards

Python (Backend)

# Package manager
uv

# Before any commit
uv run ruff format .
uv run ruff check .
uv run mypy roboco/
uv run pytest

# Coverage target: 80%

TypeScript (Frontend)

# Package manager
pnpm

# Before any commit
pnpm format
pnpm lint
pnpm typecheck
pnpm test

# Coverage target: 80%

Technology Stack

Layer Technology
API Framework FastAPI
Database PostgreSQL + asyncpg
Vector Store PostgreSQL + pgvector (via piragi)
RAG Engine piragi (HyDE, hybrid search, BM25)
Cache/Queue Redis
Container Runtime Docker + Docker Compose
Cloud LLM Claude API (claude-opus-4-6)
Local LLM Ollama (glm-5:cloud for HyDE/RAG)
Embeddings qwen3-embedding:0.6b (1024 dim)
Frontend Next.js 16 + TypeScript + Tailwind + Radix UI (in panel/)
Edge / Proxy nginx (single entry point on port 3000)

Multi-Agent Workspace Structure

Each agent gets their own git clone of a project, enabling parallel development without conflicts:

{ROBOCO_WORKSPACES_ROOT}/          # Default: /data/workspaces
+-- {project-slug}/
    +-- {team}/
        +-- {agent-slug}/
            +-- [git repository]

Example:

/data/workspaces/
+-- roboco/
    +-- backend/
    |   +-- be-dev-1/     # be-dev-1's workspace
    |   +-- be-dev-2/     # be-dev-2's workspace
    +-- frontend/
        +-- fe-dev-1/
        +-- fe-dev-2/

Note: the Next.js control panel now lives at roboco/panel/ inside this repo (no longer a separate roboco-panel project or workspace).

Key Configuration (roboco/config.py):

  • ROBOCO_WORKSPACES_ROOT: Root directory for workspaces (default: /data/workspaces)
  • ROBOCO_WORKSPACE_AUTO_CLONE: Auto-clone repos on first access (default: true)
  • ROBOCO_WORKSPACE_CLONE_TIMEOUT: Clone timeout in seconds (default: 300)

On a Python workspace, WorkspaceService runs uv sync --extra dev (not plain uv sync) so the clone's .venv carries the full gate toolchain (ruff/mypy/xenon/pytest) — the lint/type/complexity tools live in the dev extra, which plain uv sync skips. Without it an agent's make quality fails on ruff: command not found and the agent can't gate its own work.

Git Workflow

Branch Naming Convention

Branch names follow the pattern: {type}/{team}/{task-hierarchy}

Types: feature, bug, chore, docs, hotfix

Task Hierarchy: Uses -- separator (not /) to avoid git ref conflicts.

Examples:

  • Root task: feature/backend/ABC12345
  • Subtask: feature/backend/ABC12345--DEF67890
  • Sub-subtask: feature/backend/ABC12345--DEF67890--GHI11111

Commit Format

Commits are automatically prefixed with the task ID:

[{task-id[:8]}] {message}

Example:

[ABC12345] Add user authentication endpoint

Work Sessions

When a developer claims a task, a WorkSession is created that tracks:

  • Branch name and base/target branches
  • All commits made during the session
  • Files modified
  • PR number/URL when created
  • Merge status and who merged

Git Credentials

Git authentication is managed per-project through encrypted GitHub PATs:

  • Each project stores its own git token - no global fallback
  • Tokens are encrypted at rest using Fernet symmetric encryption
  • API never exposes tokens - only returns has_git_token: boolean
  • Self-service via UI - users set/update tokens in project settings

Project fields:

Field Description
git_token_encrypted Fernet-encrypted GitHub PAT (DB column)
has_git_token Boolean indicator for API responses

Token flow:

  1. User creates project in UI, enters GitHub PAT
  2. Token encrypted and stored in projects.git_token_encrypted
  3. WorkspaceService decrypts token when cloning repos
  4. GitService decrypts token for PR operations (gh CLI)

HTTPS URLs require tokens - attempting to clone without a token will raise WorkspaceError.

Task Lifecycle

Task States

The complete task lifecycle is defined in roboco/foundation/policy/lifecycle.py (roboco/enforcement/task_lifecycle.py is a backwards-compat shim over it):

backlog -> pending -> claimed -> in_progress -> [blocked|paused] -> verifying
                                     |                                  |
                                     v                                  v
                                 awaiting_qa <------------------+   awaiting_documentation
                                     |         (needs_revision) |           |
                                     v                          |           v
                                 awaiting_documentation --------+   awaiting_pm_review
                                     |                                      |
                                     v                                      v
                                 awaiting_pm_review             awaiting_ceo_approval
                                     |                                      |
                                     v                                      v
                                 completed                              completed

States:

State Description
backlog PM setup phase - dependencies or session setup needed
pending Ready for work - orchestrator can spawn agents
claimed Agent has locked the task
in_progress Active development
blocked External dependency blocking progress
paused Temporarily stopped (can resume)
verifying Self-verification by developer
needs_revision QA or CEO requested changes
awaiting_qa Submitted for QA review — PR must already exist
awaiting_documentation Documentation phase — PR already open from pre-QA; doc writes docs
awaiting_pm_review Docs complete, PM reviews + merges
awaiting_ceo_approval Major tasks escalated for CEO final approval
completed Terminal state - work done and merged
cancelled Terminal state - work cancelled

Role-Based Transitions

All status transitions are validated through the enforcement layer. Key restrictions:

Transition Allowed Roles
backlogpending (activate) PM roles only
pendingclaimed (claim) Role must match task type (QA for awaiting_qa, etc.)
claimedpending (unclaim) Assignee or PM
awaiting_qaawaiting_documentation (pass) QA only
awaiting_qaneeds_revision (fail) QA only
awaiting_documentationawaiting_pm_review Documenter or Developer (parallel completion)
awaiting_pm_reviewcompleted PM roles only
awaiting_pm_reviewawaiting_ceo_approval PM roles only
awaiting_ceo_approvalcompleted/needs_revision/cancelled CEO only
Any → cancelled PM roles only

Unclaim Operation: Agents can release claimed tasks back to the pool using unclaim(). This transitions claimedpending and optionally reassigns to another agent.

Git Integration Requirements

All tasks follow git workflow. PR is created BEFORE QA review (not after) so QA can review the real PR diff on GitHub and downstream PM/CEO approval chain off a PR that already exists:

  1. claimed -> in_progress: branch_name is auto-set on claim (hierarchical branches)
  2. verifying -> awaiting_qa (submit-qa): Requires self_verified, commits, pr_number (PR open), and at least one progress_updates entry
  3. awaiting_qa -> awaiting_documentation (pass-qa): Requires pr_number and substantive QA notes
  4. awaiting_documentation -> awaiting_pm_review: Requires docs_complete=True (PR already exists from step 2 above)
  5. awaiting_pm_review -> awaiting_ceo_approval: Must have pr_number set and all subtasks in a terminal state

CEO Approval Workflow

Major tasks are escalated to CEO for final approval:

  1. PM reviews and approves, escalates to awaiting_ceo_approval
  2. CEO can:
    • Approve: Merges PR, task -> completed
    • Request changes: Task -> needs_revision
    • Cancel: Task -> cancelled

Data Models

Core Models (roboco/models/)

Model Purpose
Task Atomic unit of work with acceptance criteria
Project Git repository configuration and CI/CD commands
WorkSession Links agent work to task, tracks branch/commits/PR
Agent AI agent with role, team, capabilities
Session Communication session with messages
Channel Team communication channel
Message Extracted message from agent streams
Notification Formal notification requiring acknowledgment
Journal Agent personal log for reflections/learnings

Task Model Key Fields

# Git configuration (all tasks follow git workflow)
task_type: TaskType      # code, documentation, research, planning, design, administrative
project_id: UUID         # Project this task works on (required)
branch_name: str         # Branch for this task (auto-created on claim)
work_session_id: UUID    # Active work session

# PR tracking (parallel execution in awaiting_documentation)
pr_number: int           # GitHub/GitLab PR number
pr_url: str              # Full URL to PR
docs_complete: bool      # Documenter has finished
pr_created: bool         # Developer has created PR

# Commits linked to task
commits: list[CommitRef] # All commits made for this task

Communication Model

Communication = constant stream (always flowing, logged, observed) Notifications = formal signals (require acknowledgment, sent by PMs/Board only)

Channel Structure

  • Cell channels: #backend-cell, #frontend-cell, #uxui-cell
  • Cross-cell: #dev-all, #qa-all, #pm-all, #doc-all
  • Management: #main-pm-board, #board-private
  • Special: #announcements (read-only except Board/Main PM), #all-hands

The Auditor has silent read access to ALL channels.

Key Principles

  1. Everything is a task - All work is tracked and documented
  2. No work without a task - Create task record first
  3. No task without acceptance criteria - How do we know it's done?
  4. No closure without documentation - Future agents need context
  5. Communication is constant - Stream reasoning, log everything
  6. State is sacred - If interrupted, state must be recoverable
  7. The Auditor sees all - Quality monitored silently
  8. Commits linked to tasks - Every commit references its task ID
  9. CEO approves major changes - Escalation path for important work

Agent Gateway

Agents do not call the API or per-domain MCP tools directly. They go through two thin MCP servers (roboco-flow, roboco-do) backed by the server-side Choreographer in roboco/services/gateway/. The Choreographer composes the existing services (TaskService, JournalService, GitService, etc.) into intent-verb sequences. Tracing, claim-locking, evidence assembly, and remediation hints are all centralized there.

Each agent gets a spawn manifest at /app/tool-manifest.json listing the verbs its role is allowed to call. The orchestrator builds the manifest from roboco/services/gateway/role_config.py and mounts it read-only into the agent container.

Verb surface (canonical source: lifecycle.spec.intents_for_role; every role also gets i_am_idle)

Role Flow verbs (beyond i_am_idle)
developer give_me_work, i_will_work_on, open_pr, i_am_done, i_am_blocked, resume, unclaim
qa give_me_work, claim_review, pass_review, fail_review, i_am_blocked, resume, unclaim
documenter give_me_work, claim_doc_task, i_documented, i_am_blocked, resume, unclaim
cell_pm give_me_work, i_will_plan, delegate, complete, submit_up, triage, unblock, escalate_up, reassign, resume, unclaim
main_pm give_me_work, i_will_plan, delegate, complete, triage, triage_all, unblock, escalate_up, escalate_to_ceo, resume, unclaim
product_owner triage, escalate_to_ceo
head_marketing triage, escalate_to_ceo
auditor triage (read-only — no say/dm)
prompter (none beyond i_am_idle — not a delivery-lifecycle role; intake interviewer, human-only)

Content tools (do_server) — most roles: commit, note, say, dm, evidence. Auditor is restricted to note (scope=reflect) + evidence. The prompter (intake) is restricted to note + evidence — human-only, no say/dm/notify.

MCP servers running per agent container

Server Purpose
roboco-flow Intent verbs (give_me_work, i_am_done, claim_review, complete, ...)
roboco-do Content tools (commit, note, say, dm, evidence)
roboco-git-readonly Read-only git: status, log, diff, branches
roboco-optimal RAG: roboco_ask_mentor, roboco_kb_search
roboco-docs Project docs file management (selected roles)

Every verb returns a standardized Envelope:

  • ok: {status, task_id, next, evidence?, context_briefing}
  • error: {error, message, remediate, missing}

The next field tells the agent what to call next; the remediate field on errors tells them exactly how to fix and retry. Agents should not guess state — trust the response.

Services

Core services in roboco/services/:

Service Purpose
TaskService Task CRUD and state transitions
WorkSessionService Git session management, PR lifecycle
WorkspaceService Multi-agent workspace resolution and cloning
ProjectService Project/repository management
MessagingService Channels, sessions, messages
NotificationService Formal notifications
JournalService Agent journals and entries
OptimalService RAG queries using piragi
PermissionsService Role-based access control

Configuration

Key settings in roboco/config.py (env prefix: ROBOCO_):

# Database
ROBOCO_DATABASE_HOST=localhost
ROBOCO_DATABASE_PORT=5432
ROBOCO_DATABASE_USER=roboco
ROBOCO_DATABASE_PASSWORD=roboco
ROBOCO_DATABASE_NAME=roboco

# Redis
ROBOCO_REDIS_HOST=localhost
ROBOCO_REDIS_PORT=6379

# Security (REQUIRED)
# Generate with: python -c 'from cryptography.fernet import Fernet; print(Fernet.generate_key().decode())'
ROBOCO_ENCRYPTION_KEY=<your-fernet-key>

# Workspaces
ROBOCO_WORKSPACES_ROOT=/data/workspaces
ROBOCO_WORKSPACE_AUTO_CLONE=true
ROBOCO_WORKSPACE_CLONE_TIMEOUT=300

# RAG (piragi + pgvector)
ROBOCO_RAG_CHUNK_STRATEGY=fixed
ROBOCO_RAG_CHUNK_SIZE=512
ROBOCO_RAG_USE_HYDE=true
ROBOCO_RAG_USE_HYBRID_SEARCH=true

# AI/LLM
ROBOCO_DEFAULT_EMBEDDING_MODEL=qwen3-embedding:0.6b
ROBOCO_LOCAL_LLM_MODEL=glm-5:cloud
ROBOCO_LOCAL_LLM_BASE_URL=http://roboco-ollama:11434/v1
ROBOCO_OLLAMA_BASE_URL=http://roboco-ollama:11434

Docker Deployment

Container Architecture

The system runs as Docker Compose services. All Dockerfiles live under docker/ at the project root; every service uses context: . plus dockerfile: docker/<name>.Dockerfile.

Service Purpose Healthcheck
postgres PostgreSQL + pgvector pg_isready
redis Cache, sessions, event bus redis-cli ping
ollama Local LLM + embeddings ollama list
ollama-init Pulls models on startup One-shot
agent-base-image / agent-*-image Pre-built images spawned per agent One-shot
orchestrator API + agent spawner Depends on all above
panel Next.js control panel (internal, port 3000)
nginx Reverse proxy fronting panel + orchestrator

Single Entry Point

nginx is the only externally-exposed service. It listens on localhost:3000 and routes:

  • /api/* and /ws/*orchestrator:8000
  • everything else → panel:3000

This avoids CORS since the browser sees one origin. The Next.js code uses relative URLs (/api, /ws) and lets nginx do the dispatch.

WebSocket streams

The orchestrator exposes WebSocket endpoints under /ws (router in roboco/api/websocket.py, ConnectionManager + broadcast_* helpers):

Endpoint Purpose
/ws/channels/{id}, /ws/agents/{id}, /ws/sessions/{id}, /ws/notifications/{id} Per-resource live streams
/ws/system Operator/system-wide stream (no per-agent keying) — the rate-limit lifecycle (RATE_LIMIT_HIT / RATE_LIMIT_LIFTED) and live usage (USAGE_UPDATE / USAGE_SNAPSHOT, pushed to the usage dashboard)

Server-side events reach these sockets through roboco/api/websocket_bridge.py, which subscribes to the StreamEventBus and forwards each event to the matching connections. To add a new live event: define an EventType (dotted value), publish it to the bus, add a _handle_* forwarder in websocket_bridge, and consume it on the panel via the useWebSocket("/<endpoint>", …) hook — do not stand up a parallel endpoint or client stack.

Rate limiting & usage

  • Provider rate limits are tracked in Redis (RateLimitStateTracker, roboco/services/gateway/). On a provider 429 an agent calls i_am_blocked(reason="rate_limited"); the spawn gate then queues (never drops) further work for that provider, and a background probe-and-resume loop in the orchestrator clears the limit and revives parked agents when it lifts.
  • Token usage is captured per agent session from the Claude Code transcript via the SDK server's /usage/sync (hook → orchestrator finalize → agent_spawn_sessionsdaily_usage_rollups → dashboard). Cost uses provider-aware pricing in roboco/billing/pricing.py (Anthropic priced; local/Ollama intentionally $0). The token sweep also publishes USAGE_UPDATE/USAGE_SNAPSHOT to /ws/system, so the dashboard's "Token Usage & Cost" panel updates live and falls back to HTTP polling when the stream is down.

Startup Sequence

The startup order is critical due to dependencies:

postgres ──┐
redis ─────┼──> ollama ──> ollama-init ──> orchestrator ──> panel ──> nginx
           │        │            │
           │        │            └── Pulls qwen3-embedding:0.6b, glm-5:cloud
           │        └── Healthcheck: ollama list
           └── Healthcheck: pg_isready, redis-cli ping

Important timing notes:

  1. ollama-init pulls models (~30s for embedding model, ~2min for LLM)
  2. Orchestrator waits for models before starting
  3. FastAPI lifespan indexes documents using Ollama (~30-60s)
  4. Orchestrator polls /health until API is ready before starting dispatcher
  5. After orchestrator is up, panel (Next.js) builds/starts, then nginx

Database migrations

Schema changes ship as Alembic migrations under alembic/versions/. Run:

docker compose exec orchestrator alembic upgrade head

after pulling any change that adds a new migration.

Ollama Configuration

Ollama provides two APIs:

  • /v1/* - OpenAI-compatible API (for LLM chat/completion)
  • /api/* - Native Ollama API (for embeddings, model management)

The embedder uses /api/embed endpoint with the qwen3-embedding:0.6b model.

Environment variables for Docker:

ROBOCO_LOCAL_LLM_BASE_URL=http://roboco-ollama:11434/v1    # OpenAI-compat
ROBOCO_OLLAMA_BASE_URL=http://roboco-ollama:11434          # Native API

Common Issues

Symptom Cause Fix
404 /api/embed Model not pulled Check docker logs roboco-ollama-init
All connection attempts failed API not ready Orchestrator starts before FastAPI lifespan completes
Healthcheck failing Wrong endpoint Use ollama list not curl

Blueprint Reference

The complete system design is documented in HOMELAB_TEAM_V0.md, which contains:

  • Organizational structure and role descriptions
  • Communication matrix and notification permissions
  • API endpoint specifications
  • Security and access control model
  • Configuration templates