roboco-app[bot]GitHubFrontend Developer 1roboco-app[bot] <302741806+roboco-app[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>* [dae66a7f] docs(frontend): add 2026-07-29 blocker-findings audit report (#724) Co-authored-by: Frontend Developer 1 <fe-dev-1@roboco.tech> * [9a9cbb14] docs(frontend): fix 3 pr_gate findings on blocker-findings audit report (#729) Add the audit doc to README's Available docs index, replace the unsupported CLA-CI lifecycle citation with a plain no-evidence statement, and add an auditable Triaged section naming the two triage() calls and their approximate timestamps. Co-authored-by: Frontend Developer 1 <fe-dev-1@roboco.tech> * [e0f05e44] Sync branch onto master and fix audit-doc wording nit (#730) * [e0f05e44] docs(frontend): fix present-tense wording in blocker-findings audit report * [e0f05e44] docs(frontend): reflow hard-wrapped paragraphs in blocker-findings audit report make reflow-check (part of make quality, the local equivalent of the GitHub 'Python quality gate' job) was failing because several paragraphs in docs/frontend/blocker-findings-audit-2026-07-29.md were hard-wrapped across multiple lines instead of the repo's one-line-per- paragraph markdown convention. Ran make reflow-docs to collapse each paragraph to a single line; no prose content changed. --------- Co-authored-by: Frontend Developer 1 <fe-dev-1@roboco.tech> --------- Co-authored-by: roboco-app[bot] <302741806+roboco-app[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Frontend Developer 1 <fe-dev-1@roboco.tech>
1.6 KiB
Frontend Blocker-Findings Audit — 2026-07-29
Outcome
Sentinel flagged an org-wide backlog of open BLOCKER-severity findings sitting in the task_review_findings ledger. As part of the response, the frontend cell PM triaged the frontend cell's needs_revision / awaiting_pm_review backlog for tasks carrying an open BLOCKER-severity finding.
Result: 0 open BLOCKER-severity findings were found on frontend tasks as of the 2026-07-29 triage pass. No frontend task sat in needs_revision or awaiting_pm_review at either checkpoint.
Triaged
No individual frontend task IDs were enumerated in this pass — the audit ran via two aggregate triage() calls against the frontend cell's needs_revision / awaiting_pm_review backlog rather than per-task lookups:
- ~16:51 UTC (cold run) —
triage()returned zero frontend tasks inneeds_revisionorawaiting_pm_reviewwith an unresolved review outcome. - ~18:21 UTC (re-run after clearing the notification/A2A inbox, to rule out stale items masking real backlog) —
triage()returned the same zero-match result.
Both results were cross-referenced against recent_team_activity, which showed no frontend task in needs_revision at either checkpoint. Because triage() returns an aggregate empty-set signal rather than a task list, no individual task IDs exist to enumerate beyond these two calls.
Assessment
0 open blockers found on frontend tasks this pass, so this audit gives no direct evidence on whether mark_addressed/mark_verified is working — only that nothing is currently stuck.