Files
roboco/tests/foundation/test_lifecycle_spec.py
T
9f8834155a Feature: prompter gold upgrade (#84)
* feat(prompter): make the assistant a RoboCo insider and fully wire launch

The Prompter's intelligence lived in two thin static prompts, so it asked
generic checklist questions and produced a flat task. The launch path was
also only half-wired: the panel called the generic task-create endpoint with
no project, bypassing the Prompter's own confirm flow.

Interview brain
- Rewrite the chat system prompt with RoboCo's org model, the task-spec
  standard, a dimensions playbook, and a reflect-back, 1-2-questions-per-turn,
  auto-stop discipline.
- Inject the live projects/products list each turn so the assistant grounds
  questions in real surfaces and resolves the target itself.
- Replace the brittle phrase-match readiness with a parsed roboco-meta control
  block (parse_readiness); the block is stripped from the visible reply and the
  turn now returns draft_ready + scale.

Structured GOLD draft
- Add first-class draft fields (objective, what_this_builds, the_work, notes)
  carried in the existing draft_data JSONB — no migration.
- Compose the GOLD markdown description deterministically from those fields
  (compose_description); the model never hand-formats the body.

Adaptive routing + wired launch
- Confirm now runs through the Prompter confirm endpoint with the human's
  project/product choice and edited structured draft.
- Single-cell targets a project and the cell team; a multi-cell feature targets
  a product and becomes a Main-PM coordination root that fans out.

Frontend
- Turn-envelope draft_ready (drop the duplicated phrase-match), structured
  draft card, confirm dialog with a project/product picker and a per-cell
  The Work editor, and the corrected priority labels (0 highest .. 3 lowest).

* fix(prompter): commit session writes so they survive across requests

Session create returned 201 but the row was never durably committed, so the
immediately-following /messages call could not find it and 404'd. The prompter
routes were the only write surface that never called db.commit() — every other
write route (tasks, a2a, groups, docs, product) commits explicitly rather than
rely on the request-teardown auto-commit, which is sensitive to middleware and
teardown ordering under the production server.

- Commit explicitly in all four prompter write routes (create session, send
  message, get/generate draft, confirm).
- Fix _get_session's NotFoundError: it passed a full sentence as resource_type,
  producing the doubled "... not found not found" message; now uses the
  (resource_type, resource_id) signature.
- Panel: when a message hits a session the server no longer has, start a fresh
  session and retry once instead of dead-ending on a stale id.

Add a regression test that gives each request its own non-committing session —
the real cross-request boundary the shared-session integration tests never
crossed. It reproduces the production 404 without the route commit and passes
with it.

* refactor(prompter): drop the "GOLD" jargon for plain wording

"GOLD" was informal shorthand for "a good/well-formed spec" that should never
have been baked into the LLM prompts, comments, and docstrings as if it were a
defined term. Replace it everywhere with plain language ("a well-formed task",
"a complete task spec", "the markdown description", "structured spec fields").
No behaviour change.

* feat(intake): add the intake interviewer agent role (static definition)

Phase 1 of the intake-agent feature: a new first-class `prompter` role — the
intake interviewer the CEO chats with to draft a task. This commit defines the
role across every foundation layer (no runtime yet); spawning + the live
session come next.

- identity: Role.PROMPTER, RoleLevel.INTAKE (lowest authority), an AGENTS row
  (intake-1) on the board team, ROLE_LEVEL entry. Deliberately NOT in
  BOARD_ROLES — it interviews, it does not review.
- lifecycle: gets i_am_idle like every agent (its only verb); no
  delivery-lifecycle intents.
- journaling: ReadTier.OWN — isolated, reads only its own journal.
- role_config: human-only manifest — note + evidence only, no say/dm/notify/
  channels; allows_subagent=True (research), allows_write=False.
- agents_config derives it automatically and correctly excludes it from
  TASK_CREATOR_ROLES (it drafts, it never creates tasks).
- seed presentation ("Intake"); regenerated lifecycle artifacts.
- role system prompt: read the code first, single-CEO awareness, propose
  rather than interrogate — written against the failures we saw.
- docs: roster count 19 -> 20, org charts, verb-surface table, usage roster.

All foundation drift checks pass; role/manifest/permission tests green.

* feat(intake): migrate agentrole enum to add 'prompter'

ALTER TYPE agentrole ADD VALUE IF NOT EXISTS 'prompter' so the intake agent
row seeds/spawns against a migrated production DB. Forward-only (postgres
can't drop enum values), guarded for offline mode — matches migration 012.

* style(intake): ruff format the role additions

* fix(intake): unguard the agentrole migration so it renders offline

The enum-migration-parity test renders 'alembic upgrade head --sql' (offline)
and greps for ALTER TYPE ... ADD VALUE. The is_offline_mode() guard skipped
emitting it, so the parity check couldn't see 'prompter'. Drop the guard —
PG16 permits ADD VALUE in a transaction, same as migration 020's backfill.

* feat(intake): the live-session driver (Claude Agent SDK loop)

Phase 2 begins. The intake agent isn't a one-shot `claude -p`; it's a live
Claude Code session the human chats with. This driver is the container's loop:
open one long-lived claude-agent-sdk ClaudeSDKClient, then per human message
run a turn (query + receive_response) and stream its events out, keeping
conversation context in-process — verified against the real SDK (v0.2.94).

- StreamChunk + normalize(): map SDK messages (StreamEvent text deltas,
  AssistantMessage text/thinking/tool_use blocks, ResultMessage→session_id) to
  panel-facing chunks. Duck-typed, so it works on real SDK objects and on test
  fakes alike — SDK-free, fully unit-tested.
- IntakeDriver.run(): the loop, with injected session/source/sink seams; a turn
  failure surfaces as an error chunk without killing the session.
- SdkIntakeSession + build_intake_options: the only SDK-coupled code (lazy
  import; needs the live claude binary, so excluded from coverage).
- Add claude-agent-sdk dependency + mypy ignore-missing-stubs.

Relay, panel SSE, and the persistent on-demand spawn are the next steps.

* Updated uv.lock

* feat(intake): the panel<->agent live bridge (registry, routes, entrypoint, image)

Wires the live intake chat end to end (Phase 2 integration layer):

- prompter_live.py: the orchestrator-side per-session registry — open/close,
  push (agent->panel), stream (SSE drain), deliver (panel->container). In-process
  (the orchestrator is single-process). 7 unit tests.
- routes/prompter_live.py: GET /live/{id}/stream (SSE), POST /live/{id}/messages
  (deliver), POST /live/{id}/events (relay in); registered under /api/prompter.
  5 integration tests.
- agent_sdk/intake_main.py: the container entrypoint — a POST /turn receiver
  (the driver's MessageSource) + a relay-poster EventSink + the ClaudeSDKClient
  session, run concurrently. 4 unit tests on the wiring helpers.
- docker/agent-prompter.Dockerfile: FROM base, ENTRYPOINT = the driver (not the
  one-shot `claude` the other agents use).

Remaining for Phase 2: the orchestrator persistent-spawn path (scope->workspace
clone, CMD = driver, registry.open on spawn, reap-on-confirm) — the deploy-side
piece, best finalized against a buildable image.

* feat(intake): orchestrator persistent spawn + start/stop for the live chat

Add the task-free spawn path for the intake (prompter) agent: one fixed
intake-1 container running the Agent-SDK driver (image ENTRYPOINT, not
claude -p), one live session at a time.

- spawn_intake_session clones the scope's repo(s) via WorkspaceService
  (project -> one; product -> each distinct project, primary first),
  composes the intake-1 prompt, resolves the model, and builds docker run
  via _build_intake_run_cmd: no settings/hook mount (driver owns 9000),
  no MCP config, no -w; registers the live relay and best-effort delivers
  the opening message once the receiver is up.
- reap_intake_session closes the relay and stops the container.
- Routes: POST /live/start (project XOR product) and POST /live/{id}/stop.
- ROLE_MODEL_MAP[prompter]=opus; intake-1 -> roboco-agent-prompter image map.
- Replace the budget-sweep try/except/continue with _fetch_budget_status,
  which logs the swallow at debug instead of silently dropping it.

25 new tests; docker + the clone are mocked. End-to-end container spawn is
pending a built image and the stack.

* feat(intake): wire /prompter to the live agent — scope form + SSE chat

Replace the Ollama chat loop on /prompter with the spawned-agent flow.

- IntakeForm: pick scope (project XOR product) + opening message + Start
  before the chat; the agent clones that scope and reads the real code.
- use-prompter rewritten as the live brain (lib/api/prompter-live.ts): Start
  spawns via POST /live/start, then an EventSource on /live/{id}/stream
  streams the agent working — token deltas fill the assistant bubble,
  tool_use/thinking drive a live activity line, a draft event renders the
  existing DraftProposalCard. Messages go via POST /live/{id}/messages.
- Chat UX unchanged (Keep Chatting / Review & Confirm / ConfirmDialog reused);
  reap-on-confirm and reap-on-leave call POST /live/{id}/stop.
- Drop the dead Ollama prompterApi client; trim prompter.ts to shared types.

Frontend gate green (tsc --noEmit, lint, build). The draft event + the
/live/{id}/confirm endpoint are the Phase 4 backend seam.

* feat(intake): confirm draft -> backlog task + agent draft emission

Complete the live intake vertical: the agent proposes a structured draft and
Review & Confirm turns it into a task.

- Draft emission: the prompter prompt instructs the agent to emit a fenced
  roboco-draft JSON block when the spec is ready; the driver parses it into a
  'draft' event over the existing relay -> the panel's DraftProposalCard. The
  panel strips the raw block from the chat bubble.
- Fix a double-text bug: with include_partial_messages the reply arrives as
  both StreamEvent deltas and the final AssistantMessage; the driver now takes
  text from deltas only and the AssistantMessage for thinking/tool_use/draft.
- POST /live/{id}/confirm -> confirm_live_draft, reusing a draft->task core
  extracted from confirm_draft; reaps the session on success.
- Both prompter confirm paths create at BACKLOG, not pending: backlog is the
  holding area a draft waits in until it's reviewed and promoted to pending
  (TaskService.activate). The legacy Ollama confirm was creating at pending,
  skipping that gate — fixed.
- Remove the dead 'context' bootstrap param from the Ollama session-create
  chain (schema + route + method + tests), superseded by the live scope form.
- No suppressions: replace every type:ignore/noqa across the intake surface
  with a real fix (ORM .id -> UUID(str(x)); fakes -> monkeypatch.setattr;
  lazy imports -> pyproject per-file ignore; union-attr -> recipients[0]).

Full make quality green; frontend tsc + lint green.

* build(intake): add the agent-prompter image builder to compose

The orchestrator references roboco-agent-prompter (AGENT_IMAGES + the
_ensure_agent_image dockerfile map) and docker/agent-prompter.Dockerfile
exists, but docker-compose.yml built every other agent image up front and
left this one out — so the image wasn't pre-built for a stack bring-up.

Mirror the other specialized agent-*-image builders: build from
docker/agent-prompter.Dockerfile, tag roboco-agent-prompter, depend on
agent-base-image.

* Created docker-compose.yaml for the NAS

* fix(intake): non-blocking /live/start so spawn never times out

The start POST awaited the whole spawn — workspace clone + first-time image
build + docker run — which blew past the panel's 60s HTTP timeout ('Request
timed out. The server may be busy.') and triggered a duplicate send. Found on
the 2026-06-09 NAS smoke.

- start_intake_session opens the live relay synchronously, then spawns the
  container in the background (_spawn_intake_container_guarded). The route
  returns the session id immediately; the panel opens the SSE stream right away.
- A background spawn failure is pushed onto the relay as an 'error' event and
  closes the session, so the panel shows it instead of hanging.
- spawn_intake_session stays as the synchronous variant for direct callers/tests.
- Panel shows a 'Preparing the agent…' indicator until the first event arrives.

18 intake-spawn tests green; tsc + lint green. E2E re-validates on next smoke.

* fix(intake): propose_draft MCP tool + lock the agent down

Smoke 2026-06-09 exposed two compounding problems: the agent never reliably
emitted the draft (it narrated the spec instead of typing the magic fence), and
it had inherited the CEO's entire Claude Code env — Write/Edit/Bash + Gmail/
Notion/Calendar/Drive MCP — because bypassPermissions ignored the allowlist and
the mounted ~/.claude leaked the host MCP config.

- propose_draft: build_intake_options now registers an in-process SDK MCP tool
  (create_sdk_mcp_server + @tool). The agent calls it to submit the draft; the
  driver turns that ToolUseBlock into a 'draft' event (_is_propose_draft /
  _draft_from_tool_input, tolerant of nested/flat/JSON-string input). The fenced
  roboco-draft block stays as a fallback.
- Lockdown: strict_mcp_config=True + setting_sources=[] (ignore host MCP +
  settings); permission_mode 'dontAsk' + a can_use_tool gate enforcing a hard
  allowlist (Read/Grep/Glob/Task + propose_draft) replaces bypassPermissions.
- Prompt: call propose_draft (not a fence); the draft's downstream chain is
  backlog -> Board (PO + HoM) -> CEO approve -> Main PM, and the agent's job ends
  at the draft (it never routes or hands off).

SDK API verified against the installed claude-agent-sdk. Driver detection unit-
tested; the SDK-construction is validated on the next NAS smoke (incl. that
setting_sources=[] doesn't break the mounted-~/.claude auth).

* fix(intake): panel UX cluster from the smoke (#3/#4/#6/#12)

- #3 message boundaries: a tool call now ends the current text bubble, so the
  agent's words before and after a tool render as separate messages instead of
  one merged wall (the 'two waves merged into one bubble' the CEO saw).
- #4 activity indicator: promoted from tiny grey text to a prominent primary-
  tinted pill so 'watch it work' is actually visible.
- #12 End chat: a header button (any chat state) reaps the agent and resets to
  the form, reusing startAnother (which already stops the session). Backend
  POST /live/{id}/stop already existed.
- #6 log noise: the opening-message delivery retry logs at debug, not error —
  those failures are expected until the container receiver is up.
- Also fix a latent test gap from the #1 commit: the live-route test's fake
  orchestrator now exposes start_intake_session (the route's non-blocking entry).

Frontend tsc + lint green; live-route + prompter_live tests green.

* fix(intake): render markdown in the chat bubbles (#8)

The agent emits rich markdown (### headers, **bold**, tables, lists) but the
bubble rendered raw text, so it was illegible (CEO-flagged on the smoke). Render
assistant content with react-markdown + remark-gfm (GFM tables) in a prose
container. Adds react-markdown + remark-gfm to the panel.

* feat(intake): #14 — two start routes (Board review vs straight to Main PM)

Per the CEO spec, the draft confirm now starts the task at PENDING with an
explicit assignment instead of parking it at backlog:

- route="board" (Board review & Start): assigned to the Product Owner, so the
  orchestrator dispatches the full Board review (PO + Head of Marketing) before
  the Main PM picks it up.
- route="main_pm" (Approve & Start): assigned straight to the Main PM, who
  delegates to the cells (Board review skipped).

create_task_from_draft gains status + assigned_to params (default BACKLOG, so the
legacy confirm_draft is unchanged); confirm_live_draft + the /live/{id}/confirm
request carry the route. Service tests cover both routes.

* feat(intake): #14 draft-card buttons — Board review vs Approve & Start

Three buttons on the draft card now (CEO spec): Keep chatting / Board review &
Start / Approve & Start. The two action buttons confirm directly with their
route — launchTask(route) sends route to POST /live/{id}/confirm, which starts
the task at pending assigned to the Board (PO+HoM) or straight to the Main PM.

Supersedes the ConfirmDialog review step (scope is chosen up front in the form),
so it's removed from the page flow. The ConfirmDialog component + its sub-editors
are now unused — flagged for a follow-up cleanup, left in place to avoid churn.

tsc + lint green.

* fix(intake): keep the live SSE stream bound to its relay session

The orchestrator opened the relay session twice per live chat — once on the
request path (before the start call returns) and again inside the background
container spawn. The SSE stream binds to the session's queue the moment the
panel connects, so the second open swapped in a fresh queue and stranded the
stream: the agent replied normally, but its events went to the new queue while
the panel kept reading the old one, so the chat looked frozen on "Preparing…".

The second open was always redundant (the relay is opened by the caller before
the spawn). Remove it, and make open() idempotent so a live session is never
replaced out from under a stream that is already connected to it.

* fix(intake): draft-card launch buttons silently did nothing

The launch path required a `description` field, but the prompter draft schema
intentionally has none — it sends `objective` + the structured spec and the
backend composes the description (compose_description). `editableDraft.description`
was therefore undefined, so `description.trim()` inside launch validation threw a
TypeError that propagated out of the button's onClick. Clicking "Board review &
Start" / "Approve & Start" did nothing, with no feedback — the wall blocking the
whole confirm → task → reap flow.

- Map a proposed draft's description from `objective` as a fallback.
- Make launch validation null-safe.
- Replace the silent early-return with a toast that names what's missing, so a
  blocked launch is never a dead, feedback-less button again.

* fix(intake): steer the agent to ask inline, not via AskUserQuestion

The intake's job is to ask clarifying questions, so it reached for the
AskUserQuestion tool — which isn't wired to the live chat panel and isn't in its
allowlist. The bare deny left it to stumble ("let me clarify… — no worries, let
me just lay it out") and waste a visible turn.

- Prompt: spell out that it asks by writing in the chat (the human reads every
  message live) and that no question/prompt tool is available to it.
- Gate: give AskUserQuestion a specific deny message that nudges it to ask inline,
  so even a reflex attempt degrades gracefully.

Also refresh the now-stale "what happens after propose_draft" section: the draft
card has three choices (Keep chatting / Board review & Start / Approve & Start)
and produces a pending task — not the old two-button "backlog" description.

* feat(intake): copy buttons on agent messages and the draft card

The CEO asked for a way to save the agent's plan/spec elsewhere "just in case" —
a cheap manual backstop until refresh-durability lands.

- New CopyButton: async Clipboard API when available, plus a legacy
  textarea+execCommand fallback. The fallback is load-bearing — the panel is
  served over plain http on a LAN IP, where navigator.clipboard is absent
  (clipboard needs a secure context), so the modern API alone would never copy.
- Copy button under each assistant message (copies its text).
- Copy button on the draft card (copies the full spec as markdown: title,
  objective, what-this-builds, the-work per cell, notes, success criteria).

* feat(intake): unbuffer logs + log each turn so the container isn't a black box

Debugging the intake smoke was painful for two reasons: (a) the orchestrator
block-buffered stdout, so `docker logs` lagged minutes behind reality, and (b)
the intake container logged only "session opened" then went silent for the whole
conversation (the chat streams to the relay, not stdout).

- Set PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1 on the orchestrator and agent-base images so structured
  logs reach `docker logs` in real time instead of in large delayed chunks.
- Log each intake turn: "turn received" (with char count) and "turn streamed"
  (chunk count + whether a draft was emitted), so the container logs show the
  conversation's shape at a glance.

* chore(intake): remove the dead ConfirmDialog draft editor

The three-button draft card (Keep chatting / Board review & Start / Approve &
Start) replaced the old review-modal confirm flow, leaving ConfirmDialog and its
sub-editors (StringListEditor, TheWorkEditor) referenced by nothing but the
barrel export. Remove the three files and the export — typecheck + lint confirm
no remaining references.

* fix(intake): coerce bad draft enums on confirm instead of hard-failing

The intake agent is an LLM and will emit off-enum values — e.g. task_type="feature",
which is not a valid TaskType (code/documentation/research/planning/design/
administrative). `_coerce_draft_enums` called `TaskType(value)` directly, which
raised, and the confirm 400'd with "Draft has invalid or missing required fields:
'feature' is not a valid TaskType". That forced the agent to discover the valid
values and self-correct in-chat — unacceptable: clicking "Approve & Start" must
never blow up on a cosmetic enum guess.

Coerce each enum to a sane default on invalid/missing (task_type→code,
nature→technical, complexity→medium); team falls back to the first valid cell in
the_work, then backend. `_lead_cell_team` now skips invalid cell names too. The
confirm/launch action no longer hard-fails on an enum the model got wrong.

* fix(intake): draft card no longer renders above the user's latest message

attachDraft fell back to "the last assistant message anywhere" when the current
turn had no streamed text yet (propose_draft called first). That last message was
often the PREVIOUS turn's — sitting above the user's "Yes, propose it" — so the
draft card rendered above the user's message. Attach only to the current turn's
streaming message; otherwise append a fresh assistant message so the card always
lands at the bottom of the thread.

* test(intake): guard draft enum coercion + invalid-cell skipping

Regression tests for the confirm-time enum coercion: an off-enum task_type
("feature") / nature / complexity coerce to code/technical/medium instead of
raising, and _lead_cell_team skips invalid cell names. Locks in that a bad enum
guess from the agent can never 400 the launch again.

* fix(intake): stop the agent fumbling through Claude Code meta-tools

In smoke it reflexively probed CC built-ins before reaching propose_draft —
plan mode + ExitPlanMode (it announced a written plan and waited instead of
emitting the draft), ToolSearch, Write — each correctly denied by the lockdown
but stumbly, and it only proposed after explicit CEO nudges.

- Gate: ExitPlanMode now gets a specific deny nudge ("you don't use plan mode;
  call propose_draft"), and the generic deny names the actual toolset instead
  of a bare "not available", so any probe degrades into guidance.
- Prompt: forbid plan mode/ExitPlanMode/ToolSearch explicitly and spell out
  "you do not plan and wait — call propose_draft directly when the spec is
  ready," plus an anti-pattern bullet.

* feat(intake): make the container logs transparent mid-turn

`docker logs` on the intake container was a black box: only turn start/end, while
the agent read the codebase and spawned 20+ subagents invisibly (the conversation
streams to the relay, not stdout), and the benign 3x ~/.claude.json warning was
the only thing visible.

- Driver logs each tool call mid-turn ("Intake tool use" with the tool name) and
  the draft emission, plus a tools count in the turn-streamed summary. Text deltas
  stay unlogged (they'd spam). Now the logs show the turn's real shape.
- Pre-create ~/.claude.json ({}) at container boot so the CLI's "config not found"
  warning (printed 3x, self-healed anyway) stops drowning the real logs.

* fix(intake): render markdown in user messages + scope copy to code blocks

Two display fixes from the smoke:
- User messages collapsed newlines (plain {content} in a div) and rendered no
  markdown — a "1.\n2.\n3." answer showed as one run-on line. Render user AND
  assistant bubbles through a shared GFM markdown body that inherits the bubble's
  text color, so lists / newlines / styling render correctly on both.
- Copy was blanketed on every assistant message; scope it to KEY parts — a copy
  button on fenced code blocks (the draft card keeps its own). Removed the
  per-message button.

* fix(intake): prevent duplicate tasks from a double-click on launch

Clicking a draft launch button twice fired two confirms and created duplicate
tasks. Add a synchronous re-entry guard (a ref — no stale-closure window) at the
top of launchTask so a second click returns immediately, and disable + spin the
draft-card buttons while a launch is in flight so it's visually clear it's working.

* docs(how-to): lead task creation with the Task Assistant flow

Rewrite "1 · It starts with you" to walk the Prompter/Task Assistant path —
scope form, the agent reading the codebase, its grounded analysis, the draft
card, and the created task — then flow into the Board review. Replaces the old
manual task-definition form shots.

Image placeholder: images/prompter_draft_card.png (the 3-button card) is
referenced but not yet captured — TODO comment marks it for the next smoke run.
A second comment flags an optional re-capture of prompter_run_2 after the
markdown-rendering fix.

* fix(intake): restore assistant message text contrast

The markdown refactor dropped `dark:prose-invert` and made text inherit the
bubble's color, but the assistant bubble had no explicit text color — so its text
rendered near-invisible (dark-on-dark on bg-muted). Give the assistant bubble an
explicit text-foreground; the user bubble already carries text-primary-foreground,
and [&_*]:!text-inherit now resolves to a readable color on both.

* fix(intake): coerce draft priority too — confirm 500'd on priority="high"

The enum-coercion fix covered task_type/nature/complexity/team, but priority is a
non-enum int field handled by `int(draft_data.get("priority", 2))`, and the agent
guesses a word ("high") as readily as a number — so int("high") raised ValueError
and the confirm 500'd. Same class of bug, one field missed.

Add _coerce_priority: map words (urgent/high/medium/low → 0/1/2/3), clamp numbers
to 0-3, default to 2 (medium) on anything else. The launch can no longer crash on
any field the LLM guessed. + regression test.

* fix(intake): draft card shows distinct cells, not one badge per work item

the_work has one entry per work item, so a cell with several items rendered its
badge repeatedly ("Board-led across Backend Backend Backend Frontend Frontend
…"). De-dupe to distinct teams so the card reads "Board-led across Backend
Frontend" — and the "Cell:" vs "Board-led across" label keys off distinct count.

* docs(how-to): hero the teaser gif + resolve the Prompter/Task Assistant thread

- Move the 12s teaser gif to the top as the hero — it was buried between the
  "prefer video" link and the first screenshot.
- Name the connection: the Task Assistant IS the Prompter, so section 1 (using
  the tool) and the rest (RoboCo building it) read as one story — you use the
  tool the company built for itself, then watch the build.
- Re-anchor the section 1 → Board transition to follow the Prompter's own
  journey, instead of implying section 1's example task is the one reviewed next.

* Included images for how-to.md

* docs(how-to): align agent count to 20 (matches README + CLAUDE.md)

The how-to said "18 agents" with UX/UI at one dev and no Intake — stale against
the authoritative count. Bump 18→20 (prose + spelled-out eighteen→twenty), give
UX/UI 2 devs, and add the Intake line to the org tree (Intake leads section 1, so
it belongs in the tree). README + CLAUDE.md already say 20.

* ci(release): publish all RoboCo images to GHCR + Docker Hub

The release published only the orchestrator to GHCR. Build and push the full set
the stack needs — agent-base, the 8 agent images, orchestrator, and panel — to
BOTH ghcr.io/rennf93/* and docker.io/renzof93/*, at :<version> and :latest, so
consumers can pull instead of compose-building.

- agent-base builds first (the agent images build FROM roboco-agent-base, a local
  tag), then the rest; push only after every build succeeds.
- Image names mirror the docker-compose `image:` values 1:1.
- Free disk on the runner first (11 images is space-heavy).
- Needs a DOCKERHUB_TOKEN repo secret for the Docker Hub login.
- SECURITY.md updated to reference both registries.

* ci(release): use short SHA as the image tag on manual dispatch

A workflow_dispatch runs against a branch, and the branch name (e.g.
feature/prompter-gold-upgrade) was used verbatim as the image tag — but "/" is
illegal in a Docker tag, so the first build failed instantly with "invalid
reference format". Releases still tag from the release tag; manual dispatch now
always uses the short SHA, which is a valid tag.

---------

Co-authored-by: Renn F <rennf93@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-06-09 17:08:34 +02:00

715 lines
25 KiB
Python

"""Tier 1 — spec self-tests. Fast (no DB, no network)."""
from __future__ import annotations
from types import SimpleNamespace
from uuid import uuid4
import pytest
from roboco.foundation import _validate_lifecycle as _validate
from roboco.foundation._validate_lifecycle import reachable_from
from roboco.foundation.policy import lifecycle as spec
from roboco.foundation.policy.lifecycle import _INTENT_VERBS, IntentSpec
from roboco.models.base import TaskType as ModelTaskType
def test_role_enum_has_every_pre_gateway_role() -> None:
"""Every role from PERMISSIONS.md must be enumerated.
The canonical Role enum is now defined in `roboco.foundation.identity`
and re-exported here. It includes the 9 pre-gateway roles plus the
SYSTEM sentinel used for orchestrator-generated rows. The pre-gateway
PERMISSIONS.md is the historical canon — SYSTEM is the post-foundation
addition that doesn't appear in policy tables.
"""
expected = {
"developer",
"qa",
"documenter",
"cell_pm",
"main_pm",
"product_owner",
"head_marketing",
"auditor",
"prompter", # post-gateway intake role (human-only, drafts tasks)
"ceo",
"system",
}
actual = {r.value for r in spec.Role}
assert actual == expected, f"Role enum drift: {actual ^ expected}"
def test_status_enum_has_every_pre_gateway_status() -> None:
"""Every status from STATUS_TRANSITIONS.md must be enumerated."""
expected = {
"backlog",
"pending",
"claimed",
"in_progress",
"blocked",
"paused",
"verifying",
"awaiting_qa",
"needs_revision",
"awaiting_documentation",
"awaiting_pm_review",
"awaiting_ceo_approval",
"completed",
"cancelled",
}
actual = {s.value for s in spec.Status}
assert actual == expected, f"Status enum drift: {actual ^ expected}"
def test_task_type_enum_matches_models() -> None:
"""The spec's TaskType must match the existing models.base.TaskType.
If the existing model adds/removes a type, the spec must be updated
in lockstep — that's the entire point of this module.
"""
spec_values = {t.value for t in spec.TaskType}
model_values = {t.value for t in ModelTaskType}
assert spec_values == model_values, (
f"TaskType drift between lifecycle.spec and models.base: "
f"{spec_values ^ model_values}"
)
def test_decision_allow_has_no_rejection_kind() -> None:
d = spec.Decision.allow()
assert d.allowed is True
assert d.rejection_kind is None
assert d.message is None
assert d.missing == []
assert d.remediate is None
def test_decision_reject_requires_rejection_kind() -> None:
d = spec.Decision.reject(
kind="not_authorized",
message="role 'developer' may not call delegate",
remediate="only PMs delegate; call give_me_work() instead",
)
assert d.allowed is False
assert d.rejection_kind == "not_authorized"
assert d.message == "role 'developer' may not call delegate"
assert d.remediate == "only PMs delegate; call give_me_work() instead"
def test_decision_tracing_gap_carries_missing_list() -> None:
d = spec.Decision.tracing_gap(
missing=["plan", "journal:decision"],
remediate="provide plan and a journal:decision entry",
)
assert d.allowed is False
assert d.rejection_kind == "tracing_gap"
assert d.missing == ["plan", "journal:decision"]
assert d.remediate == "provide plan and a journal:decision entry"
def test_decision_tracing_gap_defensively_copies_missing() -> None:
"""tracing_gap must isolate the stored list from the caller's source."""
src = ["plan"]
d = spec.Decision.tracing_gap(missing=src, remediate="r")
src.append("mutated")
assert d.missing == ["plan"]
def test_decision_invariants_enforced_at_construction() -> None:
"""allowed=True ⇒ rejection_kind None; allowed=False ⇒ kind set."""
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="allowed=True requires rejection_kind=None"):
spec.Decision(
allowed=True,
rejection_kind="not_authorized",
message="x",
missing=[],
remediate="x",
)
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="allowed=False requires rejection_kind"):
spec.Decision(
allowed=False,
rejection_kind=None,
message="x",
missing=[],
remediate="x",
)
def test_decision_invariant_rejects_allowed_with_missing_or_remediate() -> None:
"""allowed=True with missing or remediate set raises (Fix 1 lock-in)."""
with pytest.raises(
ValueError, match="allowed=True requires missing=\\[\\] and remediate=None"
):
spec.Decision(
allowed=True,
rejection_kind=None,
message=None,
missing=["plan"],
remediate=None,
)
with pytest.raises(
ValueError,
match="allowed=True requires missing=\\[\\] and remediate=None",
):
spec.Decision(
allowed=True,
rejection_kind=None,
message=None,
missing=[],
remediate="oops",
)
def test_precondition_check_returns_bool() -> None:
"""A Precondition.check() is the gate-table evaluator."""
p = spec.Precondition(
key="commits>=1",
check=lambda task, _agent, _ctx: bool(getattr(task, "commits", None)),
remediate="commit at least once before opening a PR",
missing_token="commits>=1",
)
task_with = SimpleNamespace(commits=["abc"])
task_without = SimpleNamespace(commits=[])
assert p.check(task_with, None, None) is True
assert p.check(task_without, None, None) is False
def test_action_spec_holds_role_status_and_precondition_data() -> None:
a = spec.ActionSpec(
name="claim",
allowed_roles=frozenset({spec.Role.DEVELOPER}),
source_statuses=frozenset({spec.Status.PENDING, spec.Status.NEEDS_REVISION}),
target_status=spec.Status.CLAIMED,
allowed_task_types=None,
preconditions=(),
self_review_block=False,
needs_team_match=True,
)
assert a.name == "claim"
assert spec.Role.DEVELOPER in a.allowed_roles
assert a.target_status == spec.Status.CLAIMED
def test_intent_spec_composes_atomic_actions() -> None:
i = spec.IntentSpec(
name="i_will_work_on",
allowed_roles=frozenset({spec.Role.DEVELOPER}),
description="Claim a task and start work on it.",
composes=("claim", "set_plan", "start"),
extra_preconditions=(),
side_effects=(),
next_hint=lambda _t: "edit + commit, then open_pr",
)
assert i.composes == ("claim", "set_plan", "start")
assert i.next_hint(None) == "edit + commit, then open_pr"
def test_status_transition_carries_role_constraint_optional() -> None:
t = spec.StatusTransition(
source=spec.Status.AWAITING_QA,
target=spec.Status.AWAITING_DOCUMENTATION,
triggered_by_action="qa_pass",
role_constraint=frozenset({spec.Role.QA}),
)
assert t.source == spec.Status.AWAITING_QA
assert t.target == spec.Status.AWAITING_DOCUMENTATION
assert t.triggered_by_action == "qa_pass"
assert t.role_constraint == frozenset({spec.Role.QA})
def test_status_transitions_includes_dev_path() -> None:
"""The dev happy path: pending → claimed → in_progress → verifying → awaiting_qa."""
sources = {(t.source, t.target) for t in spec._STATUS_TRANSITIONS}
assert (spec.Status.PENDING, spec.Status.CLAIMED) in sources
assert (spec.Status.CLAIMED, spec.Status.IN_PROGRESS) in sources
assert (spec.Status.IN_PROGRESS, spec.Status.VERIFYING) in sources
assert (spec.Status.VERIFYING, spec.Status.AWAITING_QA) in sources
def test_status_transitions_includes_qa_paths() -> None:
sources = {(t.source, t.target) for t in spec._STATUS_TRANSITIONS}
assert (spec.Status.AWAITING_QA, spec.Status.CLAIMED) in sources # QA claims
assert (spec.Status.AWAITING_QA, spec.Status.AWAITING_DOCUMENTATION) in sources
assert (spec.Status.AWAITING_QA, spec.Status.NEEDS_REVISION) in sources
def test_status_transitions_includes_ceo_paths() -> None:
sources = {(t.source, t.target) for t in spec._STATUS_TRANSITIONS}
assert (spec.Status.AWAITING_PM_REVIEW, spec.Status.COMPLETED) in sources
assert (
spec.Status.AWAITING_PM_REVIEW,
spec.Status.AWAITING_CEO_APPROVAL,
) in sources
assert (spec.Status.AWAITING_CEO_APPROVAL, spec.Status.COMPLETED) in sources
assert (spec.Status.AWAITING_CEO_APPROVAL, spec.Status.NEEDS_REVISION) in sources
# A blocked task the PM cannot resolve can also be surfaced to the CEO.
assert (spec.Status.BLOCKED, spec.Status.AWAITING_CEO_APPROVAL) in sources
def test_status_transitions_includes_block_pause_paths() -> None:
sources = {(t.source, t.target) for t in spec._STATUS_TRANSITIONS}
assert (spec.Status.IN_PROGRESS, spec.Status.BLOCKED) in sources
assert (spec.Status.IN_PROGRESS, spec.Status.PAUSED) in sources
assert (spec.Status.BLOCKED, spec.Status.IN_PROGRESS) in sources
assert (spec.Status.PAUSED, spec.Status.IN_PROGRESS) in sources
def test_every_non_terminal_status_can_be_cancelled() -> None:
"""PERMISSIONS.md says PM/CEO can cancel from any state."""
cancellable = {
t.source for t in spec._STATUS_TRANSITIONS if t.target == spec.Status.CANCELLED
}
non_terminal = set(spec.Status) - {spec.Status.COMPLETED, spec.Status.CANCELLED}
assert non_terminal <= cancellable, (
f"Statuses missing a cancel transition: {non_terminal - cancellable}"
)
def test_status_graph_lookup_returns_targets() -> None:
"""STATUS_GRAPH is a quick `source -> {targets}` lookup."""
assert spec.Status.CLAIMED in spec.STATUS_GRAPH[spec.Status.PENDING]
assert spec.Status.AWAITING_QA in spec.STATUS_GRAPH[spec.Status.VERIFYING]
assert spec.STATUS_GRAPH[spec.Status.COMPLETED] == frozenset()
def test_status_transitions_role_constraints_match_canon() -> None:
"""role_constraint must encode the per-row role gates from
PERMISSIONS.md / STATUS_TRANSITIONS.md exactly. Tests that look only
at (source, target) pairs miss role-typo regressions; this test
pins the gates explicitly.
"""
by_pair = {
(t.source, t.target, t.triggered_by_action): t.role_constraint
for t in spec._STATUS_TRANSITIONS
}
# QA is the only role that can claim awaiting_qa
assert by_pair[
(spec.Status.AWAITING_QA, spec.Status.CLAIMED, "claim")
] == frozenset({spec.Role.QA})
# Documenter is the only role that can claim awaiting_documentation
assert by_pair[
(spec.Status.AWAITING_DOCUMENTATION, spec.Status.CLAIMED, "claim")
] == frozenset({spec.Role.DOCUMENTER})
# qa_pass / qa_fail: QA only
assert by_pair[
(spec.Status.AWAITING_QA, spec.Status.AWAITING_DOCUMENTATION, "qa_pass")
] == frozenset({spec.Role.QA})
assert by_pair[
(spec.Status.AWAITING_QA, spec.Status.NEEDS_REVISION, "qa_fail")
] == frozenset({spec.Role.QA})
# docs_complete: documenter only
assert by_pair[
(
spec.Status.AWAITING_DOCUMENTATION,
spec.Status.AWAITING_PM_REVIEW,
"docs_complete",
)
] == frozenset({spec.Role.DOCUMENTER})
# PM complete: cell + main PM (not board, not CEO)
assert by_pair[
(spec.Status.AWAITING_PM_REVIEW, spec.Status.COMPLETED, "complete")
] == frozenset({spec.Role.CELL_PM, spec.Role.MAIN_PM})
# escalate_to_ceo: main_pm + product_owner + head_marketing — from a
# completed review and from a blocked task, same role gate.
escalate_roles = frozenset(
{
spec.Role.MAIN_PM,
spec.Role.PRODUCT_OWNER,
spec.Role.HEAD_MARKETING,
}
)
assert (
by_pair[
(
spec.Status.AWAITING_PM_REVIEW,
spec.Status.AWAITING_CEO_APPROVAL,
"escalate_to_ceo",
)
]
== escalate_roles
)
assert (
by_pair[
(
spec.Status.BLOCKED,
spec.Status.AWAITING_CEO_APPROVAL,
"escalate_to_ceo",
)
]
== escalate_roles
)
# CEO actions: CEO only
assert by_pair[
(spec.Status.AWAITING_CEO_APPROVAL, spec.Status.COMPLETED, "ceo_approve")
] == frozenset({spec.Role.CEO})
assert by_pair[
(spec.Status.AWAITING_CEO_APPROVAL, spec.Status.NEEDS_REVISION, "ceo_reject")
] == frozenset({spec.Role.CEO})
# Cancel: PM + CEO from any non-terminal status
cancel_constraint = frozenset({spec.Role.CELL_PM, spec.Role.MAIN_PM, spec.Role.CEO})
for src in spec.Status:
if src in (spec.Status.COMPLETED, spec.Status.CANCELLED):
continue
assert by_pair[(src, spec.Status.CANCELLED, "cancel")] == cancel_constraint, (
f"cancel from {src.value} has wrong role_constraint"
)
def test_atomic_action_table_has_pre_gateway_actions() -> None:
"""Every task tool from PERMISSIONS.md must have an ActionSpec."""
expected = {
"activate",
"claim",
"start",
"set_plan",
"block",
"unblock",
"pause",
"resume",
"submit_verification",
"submit_qa",
"qa_pass",
"qa_fail",
"docs_complete",
"complete",
"submit_pm_review",
"escalate_to_ceo",
"ceo_approve",
"ceo_reject",
"cancel",
"create_subtask",
}
assert expected <= set(spec._ATOMIC_ACTIONS), (
f"Missing ActionSpec entries: {expected - set(spec._ATOMIC_ACTIONS)}"
)
def test_claim_action_allows_developer_from_pending() -> None:
a = spec._ATOMIC_ACTIONS["claim"]
assert spec.Role.DEVELOPER in a.allowed_roles
assert spec.Status.PENDING in a.source_statuses
assert a.target_status == spec.Status.CLAIMED
def test_qa_pass_self_review_blocks() -> None:
"""A QA cannot qa_pass a task they themselves committed to."""
assert spec._ATOMIC_ACTIONS["qa_pass"].self_review_block is True
assert spec._ATOMIC_ACTIONS["qa_fail"].self_review_block is True
assert spec._ATOMIC_ACTIONS["docs_complete"].self_review_block is True
def test_claim_rules_match_pre_gateway_table() -> None:
"""PERMISSIONS.md "What Each Role Can Claim From" — exact match.
PMs claim from PENDING only; BACKLOG → PENDING is a separate `activate`
action (strict transitions; no implicit activate-on-claim).
"""
assert spec.CLAIM_RULES[spec.Role.DEVELOPER] == frozenset(
{spec.Status.PENDING, spec.Status.NEEDS_REVISION}
)
assert spec.CLAIM_RULES[spec.Role.QA] == frozenset({spec.Status.AWAITING_QA})
assert spec.CLAIM_RULES[spec.Role.DOCUMENTER] == frozenset(
{spec.Status.PENDING, spec.Status.AWAITING_DOCUMENTATION}
)
assert spec.CLAIM_RULES[spec.Role.CELL_PM] == frozenset({spec.Status.PENDING})
assert spec.CLAIM_RULES[spec.Role.MAIN_PM] == frozenset({spec.Status.PENDING})
def test_team_rules_pin_team_for_seeded_agents() -> None:
assert spec.ROLE_TEAM_RULES["be-dev-1"] == "backend"
assert spec.ROLE_TEAM_RULES["be-pm"] == "backend"
assert spec.ROLE_TEAM_RULES["fe-qa"] == "frontend"
assert spec.ROLE_TEAM_RULES["main-pm"] is None # cross-cell
def test_intent_verbs_table_has_every_gateway_verb() -> None:
"""Every gateway intent verb must have an IntentSpec."""
expected = {
"give_me_work",
"i_will_work_on",
"i_will_plan",
"delegate",
"open_pr",
"i_am_done",
"i_am_blocked",
"unclaim",
"resume",
"i_am_idle",
"claim_review",
"pass_review",
"fail_review",
"claim_doc_task",
"i_documented",
"complete",
"escalate_up",
"escalate_to_ceo",
"submit_up",
"unblock",
"triage",
"triage_all",
}
assert expected <= set(spec._INTENT_VERBS), (
f"Missing IntentSpec entries: {expected - set(spec._INTENT_VERBS)}"
)
def test_i_will_work_on_composes_claim_set_plan_start() -> None:
iv = spec._INTENT_VERBS["i_will_work_on"]
assert iv.composes == ("claim", "set_plan", "start")
assert spec.Role.DEVELOPER in iv.allowed_roles
def test_i_will_plan_composes_claim_set_plan_start() -> None:
"""PMs use i_will_plan; the composition mirrors i_will_work_on."""
iv = spec._INTENT_VERBS["i_will_plan"]
assert iv.composes == ("claim", "set_plan", "start")
assert iv.allowed_roles == frozenset({spec.Role.CELL_PM, spec.Role.MAIN_PM})
def test_i_am_done_composes_submit_verification_then_submit_qa() -> None:
iv = spec._INTENT_VERBS["i_am_done"]
assert iv.composes == ("submit_verification", "submit_qa")
def test_open_pr_has_git_side_effects() -> None:
"""open_pr is a side-effect-only verb (no DB transition)."""
iv = spec._INTENT_VERBS["open_pr"]
assert "push_branch" in iv.side_effects
assert "create_pr" in iv.side_effects
assert iv.composes == () # pure side effect verb
def test_delegate_composes_create_subtask() -> None:
iv = spec._INTENT_VERBS["delegate"]
assert iv.composes == ("create_subtask",)
assert iv.allowed_roles == frozenset({spec.Role.CELL_PM, spec.Role.MAIN_PM})
_STUB_TASK_DEFAULTS = {
"status": "pending",
"task_type": "code",
"commits": [],
"plan": None,
"assigned_to": None,
"pr_number": None,
}
def _stub_task(**overrides):
fields = {**_STUB_TASK_DEFAULTS, **overrides}
fields["commits"] = fields["commits"] or []
return SimpleNamespace(**fields)
def test_can_claim_developer_pending_allowed() -> None:
d = spec.can_claim(spec.Role.DEVELOPER, _stub_task(status="pending"))
assert d.allowed is True
def test_can_claim_developer_completed_rejected() -> None:
d = spec.can_claim(spec.Role.DEVELOPER, _stub_task(status="completed"))
assert d.allowed is False
assert d.rejection_kind == "invalid_state"
def test_can_claim_developer_awaiting_qa_rejected() -> None:
"""Devs cannot claim awaiting_qa - that's QA's path."""
d = spec.can_claim(spec.Role.DEVELOPER, _stub_task(status="awaiting_qa"))
assert d.allowed is False
assert d.rejection_kind == "not_authorized"
def test_can_invoke_intent_developer_can_call_i_will_work_on() -> None:
d = spec.can_invoke_intent(
spec.Role.DEVELOPER,
"i_will_work_on",
_stub_task(status="pending"),
context=spec.Context(plan="my plan"),
)
assert d.allowed is True
def test_can_invoke_intent_pm_cannot_call_i_will_work_on() -> None:
"""PMs use i_will_plan; i_will_work_on is dev-only."""
d = spec.can_invoke_intent(
spec.Role.CELL_PM,
"i_will_work_on",
_stub_task(status="pending"),
context=spec.Context(plan="x"),
)
assert d.allowed is False
assert d.rejection_kind == "not_authorized"
def test_can_invoke_intent_developer_open_pr_no_commits_tracing_gap() -> None:
"""open_pr requires >=1 commit. Without one -> tracing_gap."""
d = spec.can_invoke_intent(
spec.Role.DEVELOPER,
"open_pr",
_stub_task(status="in_progress", commits=[]),
context=spec.Context(),
)
assert d.allowed is False
assert d.rejection_kind == "tracing_gap"
assert "commits>=1" in d.missing
def test_valid_next_verbs_developer_in_progress_includes_open_pr_and_i_am_done() -> (
None
):
verbs = spec.valid_next_verbs(spec.Role.DEVELOPER, _stub_task(status="in_progress"))
assert "open_pr" in verbs
assert "i_am_done" in verbs
assert "i_am_blocked" in verbs
def test_valid_next_verbs_pm_pending_includes_i_will_plan() -> None:
verbs = spec.valid_next_verbs(spec.Role.CELL_PM, _stub_task(status="pending"))
assert "i_will_plan" in verbs
def test_composed_actions_for_returns_intent_composition() -> None:
assert spec.composed_actions_for("i_will_work_on") == ("claim", "set_plan", "start")
assert spec.composed_actions_for("open_pr") == ()
def test_intents_for_role_returns_role_scoped_verbs() -> None:
dev_verbs = spec.intents_for_role(spec.Role.DEVELOPER)
assert "i_will_work_on" in dev_verbs
assert "open_pr" in dev_verbs
assert "i_am_done" in dev_verbs
assert "delegate" not in dev_verbs # PM only
assert "claim_review" not in dev_verbs # QA only
def test_status_after_returns_target_status() -> None:
assert spec.status_after("claim", spec.Status.PENDING) == spec.Status.CLAIMED
assert (
spec.status_after("submit_qa", spec.Status.VERIFYING) == spec.Status.AWAITING_QA
)
assert (
spec.status_after("set_plan", spec.Status.IN_PROGRESS) is None
) # no transition
def test_can_invoke_intent_open_pr_passes_when_owner_with_commits() -> None:
"""Green path for open_pr: owner + commits + no prior PR → allow."""
owner_id = uuid4()
task = _stub_task(
status="in_progress",
commits=["abc"],
pr_number=None,
assigned_to=owner_id,
)
d = spec.can_invoke_intent(
spec.Role.DEVELOPER,
"open_pr",
task,
context=spec.Context(actor_id=owner_id),
)
assert d.allowed is True, f"expected allow, got {d}"
def test_can_invoke_intent_open_pr_rejects_non_owner() -> None:
"""Non-owner trying open_pr → tracing_gap with owns_task missing."""
owner_id = uuid4()
intruder_id = uuid4()
task = _stub_task(
status="in_progress",
commits=["abc"],
pr_number=None,
assigned_to=owner_id,
)
d = spec.can_invoke_intent(
spec.Role.DEVELOPER,
"open_pr",
task,
context=spec.Context(actor_id=intruder_id),
)
assert d.allowed is False
assert d.rejection_kind == "tracing_gap"
assert "owns_task" in d.missing
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Task 8 — self-consistency validators (`_validate.py`)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def test_validators_pass_on_real_spec() -> None:
"""Importing roboco.foundation.policy.lifecycle must not raise —
module-level import IS the test. We additionally call the runner
directly so a future refactor that detaches it from import doesn't
silently skip the gate.
"""
_validate.run_all_lifecycle_validators()
def test_every_status_reachable_from_pending() -> None:
"""Reachability — except CANCELLED is its own thing and BACKLOG predates pending."""
reachable = reachable_from(spec.Status.PENDING)
expected_reachable = set(spec.Status) - {spec.Status.BACKLOG, spec.Status.CANCELLED}
assert expected_reachable <= reachable, (
f"Unreachable from pending: {expected_reachable - reachable}"
)
def test_every_intent_verb_composes_known_actions() -> None:
"""Every IntentSpec.composes must reference declared atomic actions."""
for name, iv in spec._INTENT_VERBS.items():
for action_name in iv.composes:
assert action_name in spec._ATOMIC_ACTIONS, (
f"Intent '{name}' composes unknown action '{action_name}'"
)
def test_self_review_symmetry() -> None:
"""If qa_pass blocks, qa_fail and docs_complete must too."""
qp = spec._ATOMIC_ACTIONS["qa_pass"].self_review_block
qf = spec._ATOMIC_ACTIONS["qa_fail"].self_review_block
dc = spec._ATOMIC_ACTIONS["docs_complete"].self_review_block
assert qp == qf == dc, (
"self_review_block asymmetry between qa_pass/qa_fail/docs_complete"
)
def test_run_all_validators_raises_on_unknown_intent_action(
monkeypatch: pytest.MonkeyPatch,
) -> None:
"""If an IntentSpec.composes references a non-existent action, the
validator must raise LifecycleSpecError. Pins the gate's actual
behavior — without this test, refactors that move run_all_validators()
out of the import path could silently disable the gate.
"""
iv = _INTENT_VERBS["delegate"]
broken = IntentSpec(
name=iv.name,
allowed_roles=iv.allowed_roles,
description=iv.description,
composes=("create_subtask", "ZZZ_FAKE_ACTION_DOES_NOT_EXIST"),
extra_preconditions=iv.extra_preconditions,
side_effects=iv.side_effects,
next_hint=iv.next_hint,
)
patched_intents = dict(_INTENT_VERBS)
patched_intents["delegate"] = broken
monkeypatch.setattr(
"roboco.foundation.policy.lifecycle._INTENT_VERBS", patched_intents
)
with pytest.raises(_validate.LifecycleSpecError, match="ZZZ_FAKE_ACTION"):
_validate.run_all_lifecycle_validators()
def test_unmigrated_is_pinned() -> None:
"""The known-debt set; remove an entry once that consumer is migrated."""
assert (
frozenset(
{
"enforcement.task_lifecycle._LEGACY_OPERATIONAL_EDGES",
"enforcement.task_lifecycle._LEGACY_ROLE_GATES",
}
)
== spec.UNMIGRATED
)