mirror of
https://github.com/rennf93/roboco.git
synced 2026-08-03 07:23:24 +02:00
42f8a5d18e
* fix(board): give Board Program explorers a nothing_to_propose exit Every propose_* verb requires at least one item, so an explorer that legitimately found nothing — Barfly with no worthwhile X conversations, Coroner with no autopsy subject — had no way to close its exploration task. It declined, called i_am_idle(), and the task stayed PENDING forever: the dispatcher re-matched it every tick and respawned the board agent (~$0.61 a spawn, ~3 per 5-minute respawn-breaker cooldown window, indefinitely), and BoardProgramEngine's one-open-cycle dedup wedged that whole program shut, since the ledger row only closes once its exploration task goes terminal. nothing_to_propose(task_id, reason) is the explicit exit. task_id is required rather than inferred: one explorer role owns several independently-cadenced programs (head_marketing owns six) and each assigns its exploration task to the same agent, so several are open at once by design and guessing "the caller's oldest" completes the WRONG cycle — stamping its reason onto an unrelated program's ledger while the task actually being worked stays wedged. Resolution validates the named task exists, carries a registered program source, is assigned to the caller, and is non-terminal, then gates on the program's declared explorer role from the registry, so a program registered later needs no edit here. The reason lands on board_program_cycles (migration 089) and renders into the next cycle's LEARN context, replacing a bare "proposed 0, approved 0" with why. That write runs in its own savepoint: it flushes on the same session as the completion, and a bare try/except around a same-session flush leaves the transaction pending-rollback, so a DB blip there would discard the completion at the post-response commit while the verb reported success. All fourteen exploration prompts offer the exit, pinned by a registry-parametrized test that fails when a future program is unwired. * ci: fire PR checks on slave-based PRs, not master alone All five gating workflows declared `pull_request: branches: [master]`, but every fleet PR targets slave — cell->root, root->slave, and the CEO's own. So `pull_request` never fired for any of them, and their only coverage was the `push` trigger, which is gated on branch PREFIX (feature/bug/chore/docs/hotfix). A branch named anything else got zero checks — not a red run, an absent one — and a PR with no required check present merges on a false green. PR #711 shipped that way on a `fix/` branch. Basing on the branch a PR merges INTO rather than what its head is named makes coverage independent of branch naming, so a non-conforming prefix can only ever cost the redundant push run, never the whole gate. The same five also omitted slave from `push` (ci.yml aside, which added it for the release gate's fail-closed CI read), so the panel suite, both CodeQL analyses, and the e2e smoke never ran on the trunk master is cut from. --------- Co-authored-by: Renn F <rennf93@users.noreply.github.com>