# CLAUDE.md This file provides guidance to Claude Code (claude.ai/code) when working with code in this repository. ## Licensing RoboCo is licensed under **AGPL-3.0** (see `LICENSE`). Copyright (c) 2026 Renzo Franceschini. Do NOT reintroduce an MIT or other license reference anywhere (README, headers, package metadata) — the project is AGPL. Contributions require a signed **Contributor License Agreement** (`CLA.md`), automated via the CLA Assistant workflow (`.github/workflows/cla.yml`). The CLA preserves the option to dual-license / offer a commercial edition later; keep copyright assignment language intact. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Project Overview **RoboCo** is an AI Agentic Company - a virtual organization of 25 AI agents + 1 human CEO, designed to operate as a complete software development workforce. The system implements a structured organizational hierarchy with formal communication protocols, task management, and quality controls. ### Core Architecture ``` CEO (Renzo - Human) | +-- Intake (on-demand interviewer: chats only with the CEO to draft a task) +-- Secretary (on-demand chief-of-staff: reads company state, runs gated CEO directives) +-- PR Reviewer (read-only: the main reviewer — inbound external/fork + internal PRs, and the root→master in-path gate) | +-- Board (3 agents) +-- Product Owner +-- Head of Marketing +-- Auditor (silent observer, reports to CEO) | +-- Main PM (coordinates all cells) | +-- Backend Cell (6 agents: 2 Devs, 1 QA, 1 PM, 1 Documenter, 1 PR Reviewer) +-- Frontend Cell (6 agents: 2 Devs, 1 QA, 1 PM, 1 Documenter, 1 PR Reviewer) +-- UX/UI Cell (6 agents: 2 Devs, 1 QA, 1 PM, 1 Documenter, 1 PR Reviewer) ``` ### Hardware Infrastructure - **Olares One (Powerhouse)**: Intel Ultra 9 + RTX 5090, runs Claude Code instances and AI inference - NOT YET ARRIVED - **UGREEN NAS (Warehouse)**: 36TB RAID6, 128GB RAM, hosts PostgreSQL, Redis - **Pi Cluster (Operations)**: Monitoring, notifications, smart home ## Development Standards ### Python (Backend) ```bash # Package manager uv # Before any commit uv run ruff format . uv run ruff check . uv run mypy roboco/ uv run pytest # Coverage target: 80% ``` ### TypeScript (Frontend) ```bash # Package manager pnpm # Before any commit pnpm format pnpm lint pnpm typecheck pnpm test # Coverage target: 80% ``` ## Technology Stack | Layer | Technology | |-------|------------| | API Framework | FastAPI | | Database | PostgreSQL + asyncpg | | Vector Store | PostgreSQL + pgvector (in-house engine) | | RAG Engine | in-house (asyncpg + pgvector, hybrid retrieval) | | Cache/Queue | Redis | | Container Runtime | Docker + Docker Compose | | Cloud LLM | Claude API (claude-opus-4-6) + xAI Grok (official `grok` CLI, SuperGrok subscription) | | Local LLM | Ollama (glm-5:cloud for RAG/hybrid retrieval) | | Embeddings | qwen3-embedding:0.6b (1024 dim) | | Frontend | Next.js 16 + TypeScript + Tailwind + Radix UI (in `panel/`) | | Edge / Proxy | nginx (single entry point on port 3000) | ## Multi-Agent Workspace Structure Each agent gets their own git clone of a project, enabling parallel development without conflicts: ``` {ROBOCO_WORKSPACES_ROOT}/ # Default: /data/workspaces +-- {project-slug}/ +-- {team}/ +-- {agent-slug}/ +-- [git repository] ``` **Example:** ``` /data/workspaces/ +-- roboco/ +-- backend/ | +-- be-dev-1/ # be-dev-1's workspace | +-- be-dev-2/ # be-dev-2's workspace +-- frontend/ +-- fe-dev-1/ +-- fe-dev-2/ ``` Note: the Next.js control panel now lives at `roboco/panel/` inside this repo (no longer a separate `roboco-panel` project or workspace). **Key Configuration (roboco/config.py):** - `ROBOCO_WORKSPACES_ROOT`: Root directory for workspaces (default: `/data/workspaces`) - `ROBOCO_WORKSPACE_AUTO_CLONE`: Auto-clone repos on first access (default: `true`) - `ROBOCO_WORKSPACE_CLONE_TIMEOUT`: Clone timeout in seconds (default: `300`) On a Python workspace, `WorkspaceService` runs `uv sync --extra dev` (not plain `uv sync`) so the clone's `.venv` carries the full gate toolchain (ruff/mypy/xenon/pytest) — the lint/type/complexity tools live in the `dev` **extra**, which plain `uv sync` skips. Without it an agent's `make quality` fails on `ruff: command not found` and the agent can't gate its own work. ## Git Workflow ### Branch Naming Convention Branch names follow the pattern: `{type}/{team}/{task-hierarchy}` **Types:** `feature`, `bug`, `chore`, `docs`, `hotfix` **Task Hierarchy:** Uses `--` separator (not `/`) to avoid git ref conflicts. **Examples:** - Root task: `feature/backend/ABC12345` - Subtask: `feature/backend/ABC12345--DEF67890` - Sub-subtask: `feature/backend/ABC12345--DEF67890--GHI11111` ### Commit Format Commits are automatically prefixed with the task ID: ``` [{task-id[:8]}] {message} ``` **Example:** ``` [ABC12345] Add user authentication endpoint ``` ### Work Sessions When a developer claims a task, a **WorkSession** is created that tracks: - Branch name and base/target branches - All commits made during the session - Files modified - PR number/URL when created - Merge status and who merged ### Git Credentials Git authentication is managed **per-project** through encrypted GitHub PATs: - **Each project stores its own git token** - no global fallback - **Tokens are encrypted at rest** using Fernet symmetric encryption - **API never exposes tokens** - only returns `has_git_token: boolean` - **Self-service via UI** - users set/update tokens in project settings **Project fields:** | Field | Description | |-------|-------------| | `git_token_encrypted` | Fernet-encrypted GitHub PAT (DB column) | | `has_git_token` | Boolean indicator for API responses | **Token flow:** 1. User creates project in UI, enters GitHub PAT 2. Token encrypted and stored in `projects.git_token_encrypted` 3. WorkspaceService decrypts token when cloning repos 4. GitService decrypts token for PR operations (gh CLI) **HTTPS URLs require tokens** - attempting to clone without a token will raise `WorkspaceError`. ## Task Lifecycle ### Task States The complete task lifecycle is defined in `roboco/foundation/policy/lifecycle.py` (`roboco/enforcement/task_lifecycle.py` is a backwards-compat shim over it): ``` backlog -> pending -> claimed -> in_progress -> [blocked|paused] -> verifying | | v v awaiting_qa <------------------+ awaiting_documentation | (needs_revision) | | v | v awaiting_documentation --------+ awaiting_pm_review | | v v awaiting_pm_review awaiting_ceo_approval | | v v completed completed ``` **In-path PR-review gate** (`awaiting_pr_review`): each assembled PR is reviewed before the PM merges. The cell PM's `submit_up` opens the cell→root PR and the Main PM's `submit_root` opens the root→master PR; both enter `awaiting_pr_review`, where a reviewer `pr_pass`es it on to `awaiting_pm_review` or `pr_fail`s it back to `needs_revision` — the merge-level reject the PM otherwise lacks. Leaf dev tasks and branchless coordination roots skip the gate. **States:** | State | Description | |-------|-------------| | `backlog` | PM setup phase - dependencies or session setup needed | | `pending` | Ready for work - orchestrator can spawn agents | | `claimed` | Agent has locked the task | | `in_progress` | Active development | | `blocked` | External dependency blocking progress | | `paused` | Temporarily stopped (can resume) | | `verifying` | Self-verification by developer | | `needs_revision` | QA or CEO requested changes | | `awaiting_qa` | Submitted for QA review — PR must already exist | | `awaiting_documentation` | Documentation phase — PR already open from pre-QA; doc writes docs | | `awaiting_pr_review` | In-path PR-review gate: a reviewer checks the assembled cell→root / root→master PR before the PM merges (assembled, PR-bearing tasks only) | | `awaiting_pm_review` | Docs complete, PM reviews + merges | | `awaiting_ceo_approval` | Major tasks escalated for CEO final approval | | `completed` | Terminal state - work done and merged | | `cancelled` | Terminal state - work cancelled | ### Role-Based Transitions All status transitions are validated through the enforcement layer. Key restrictions: | Transition | Allowed Roles | |------------|---------------| | `backlog` → `pending` (activate) | PM roles only | | `pending` → `claimed` (claim) | Role must match task type (QA for awaiting_qa, etc.) | | `claimed` → `pending` (unclaim) | Assignee or PM | | `awaiting_qa` → `awaiting_documentation` (pass) | QA only | | `awaiting_qa` → `needs_revision` (fail) | QA only | | `awaiting_documentation` → `awaiting_pm_review` | Documenter or Developer (parallel completion) | | `in_progress` → `awaiting_pr_review` (submit_up / submit_root) | PM roles (opens the assembled cell→root / root→master PR) | | `awaiting_pr_review` → `awaiting_pm_review` (pr_pass) | PR reviewer only | | `awaiting_pr_review` → `needs_revision` (pr_fail) | PR reviewer only | | `awaiting_pm_review` → `completed` | PM roles only | | `awaiting_pm_review` → `awaiting_ceo_approval` | PM roles only | | `awaiting_ceo_approval` → `completed/needs_revision/cancelled` | CEO only | | Any → `cancelled` | PM roles only | **Unclaim Operation**: Agents can release claimed tasks back to the pool using `unclaim()`. This transitions `claimed` → `pending` and optionally reassigns to another agent. ### Git Integration Requirements All tasks follow git workflow. PR is created BEFORE QA review (not after) so QA can review the real PR diff on GitHub and downstream PM/CEO approval chain off a PR that already exists: 1. **claimed -> in_progress**: `branch_name` is auto-set on claim (hierarchical branches) 2. **verifying -> awaiting_qa** (submit-qa): Requires `self_verified`, `commits`, `pr_number` (PR open), and at least one `progress_updates` entry 3. **awaiting_qa -> awaiting_documentation** (pass-qa): Requires `pr_number` and substantive QA notes 4. **awaiting_documentation -> awaiting_pm_review**: Requires `docs_complete=True` (PR already exists from step 2 above) 5. **awaiting_pm_review -> awaiting_ceo_approval**: Must have `pr_number` set and all subtasks in a terminal state ### CEO Approval Workflow Major tasks are escalated to CEO for final approval: 1. PM reviews and approves, escalates to `awaiting_ceo_approval` 2. CEO can: - **Approve**: Merges PR, task -> `completed` - **Request changes**: Task -> `needs_revision` - **Cancel**: Task -> `cancelled` ## Data Models ### Core Models (roboco/models/) | Model | Purpose | |-------|---------| | `Task` | Atomic unit of work with acceptance criteria | | `Project` | Git repository configuration and CI/CD commands | | `WorkSession` | Links agent work to task, tracks branch/commits/PR | | `Agent` | AI agent with role, team, capabilities | | `Session` | Communication session with messages | | `Channel` | Team communication channel | | `Message` | Extracted message from agent streams | | `Notification` | Formal notification requiring acknowledgment | | `Journal` | Agent personal log for reflections/learnings | ### Task Model Key Fields ```python # Git configuration (all tasks follow git workflow) task_type: TaskType # code, documentation, research, planning, design, administrative project_id: UUID # Project this task works on (required) branch_name: str # Branch for this task (auto-created on claim) work_session_id: UUID # Active work session # PR tracking (parallel execution in awaiting_documentation) pr_number: int # GitHub/GitLab PR number pr_url: str # Full URL to PR docs_complete: bool # Documenter has finished pr_created: bool # Developer has created PR # Commits linked to task commits: list[CommitRef] # All commits made for this task ``` ## Communication Model **Communication** = constant stream (always flowing, logged, observed) **Notifications** = formal signals (require acknowledgment, sent by PMs/Board only) ### Channel Structure - Cell channels: `#backend-cell`, `#frontend-cell`, `#uxui-cell` - Cross-cell: `#dev-all`, `#qa-all`, `#pm-all`, `#doc-all` - Management: `#main-pm-board`, `#board-private` - Special: `#announcements` (read-only except Board/Main PM), `#all-hands` The Auditor has silent read access to ALL channels. ## Key Principles 1. **Everything is a task** - All work is tracked and documented 2. **No work without a task** - Create task record first 3. **No task without acceptance criteria** - How do we know it's done? 4. **No closure without documentation** - Future agents need context 5. **Communication is constant** - Stream reasoning, log everything 6. **State is sacred** - If interrupted, state must be recoverable 7. **The Auditor sees all** - Quality monitored silently 8. **Commits linked to tasks** - Every commit references its task ID 9. **CEO approves major changes** - Escalation path for important work ## Agent Gateway Agents do not call the API or per-domain MCP tools directly. They go through two thin MCP servers (`roboco-flow`, `roboco-do`) backed by the server-side **Choreographer** in `roboco/services/gateway/`. The Choreographer composes the existing services (TaskService, JournalService, GitService, etc.) into intent-verb sequences. Tracing, claim-locking, evidence assembly, and remediation hints are all centralized there. Each agent gets a **spawn manifest** at `/app/tool-manifest.json` listing the verbs its role is allowed to call. The orchestrator builds the manifest from `roboco/services/gateway/role_config.py` and mounts it read-only into the agent container. ### Verb surface (canonical source: `lifecycle.intents_for_role`; every role also gets `i_am_idle`) | Role | Flow verbs (beyond `i_am_idle`) | |---------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | developer | `give_me_work`, `i_will_work_on`, `open_pr`, `i_am_done`, `i_am_blocked`, `resume`, `unclaim` | | qa | `give_me_work`, `claim_review`, `pass_review`, `fail_review`, `i_am_blocked`, `resume`, `unclaim` | | documenter | `give_me_work`, `claim_doc_task`, `i_documented`, `i_am_blocked`, `resume`, `unclaim` | | cell_pm | `give_me_work`, `i_will_plan`, `delegate`, `complete`, `submit_up`, `triage`, `unblock`, `escalate_up`, `reassign`, `resume`, `unclaim` | | main_pm | `give_me_work`, `i_will_plan`, `delegate`, `complete`, `submit_root`, `triage`, `triage_all`, `unblock`, `escalate_up`, `escalate_to_ceo`, `resume`, `unclaim` | | pr_reviewer | `give_me_work`, `claim_pr_review`, `post_pr_review` (inbound external/fork PRs), `claim_gate_review`, `pr_pass`, `pr_fail` (in-path assembled-PR gate) | | product_owner | `triage`, `escalate_to_ceo` | | head_marketing| `triage`, `escalate_to_ceo` | | auditor | `triage` (read-only — no `say`/`dm`) | | prompter | (none beyond `i_am_idle` — not a delivery-lifecycle role; intake interviewer, human-only) | | secretary | (none beyond `i_am_idle` — human-only chief-of-staff; reads company state + runs gated CEO directives) | Content tools (do_server) — most roles: `commit`, `note`, `say`, `dm`, `evidence`. Auditor is restricted to `note` (scope=reflect) + `evidence`. The `pr_reviewer` posts its change-request on the PR itself (no agent comms). The `prompter` (intake) and `secretary` are restricted to `note` + `evidence` — human-only, no `say`/`dm`/`notify`. ### MCP servers running per agent container | Server | Purpose | |----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------| | `roboco-flow` | Intent verbs (give_me_work, i_am_done, claim_review, complete, ...) | | `roboco-do` | Content tools (commit, note, say, dm, evidence) | | `roboco-git-readonly`| Read-only git: status, log, diff, branches | | `roboco-optimal` | RAG: `roboco_ask_mentor`, `roboco_kb_search` | | `roboco-docs` | Project docs file management (selected roles) | Every verb returns a standardized **Envelope**: - ok: `{status, task_id, next, evidence?, context_briefing}` - error: `{error, message, remediate, missing}` The `next` field tells the agent what to call next; the `remediate` field on errors tells them exactly how to fix and retry. Agents should not guess state — trust the response. ## Agent Providers Agent backends are pluggable. `roboco/llm/providers/` defines an `AgentProvider` lifecycle ABC (`base.py`) and a `ProviderRegistry` keyed by `ModelProvider` (`registry.py`), with `ClaudeCodeProvider` (default) and `GrokCliProvider`. The orchestrator resolves a provider at spawn from the agent's `ModelProvider`; when no dedicated provider is registered it falls back to the built-in Claude Code spawn. `ModelProvider` (`roboco/models/base.py`) is `ANTHROPIC` (default), `GROK`, `LOCAL`, `OLLAMA_CLOUD`, `OPENAI` (reserved). The seam is additive: only `GROK` routes through `GrokCliProvider`; Anthropic / Ollama Cloud / self-hosted spawns are unchanged, and every provider gets the same MCP gateway + tool-manifest wiring by construction. **Grok runtime.** `GROK` agents run xAI's official `grok` CLI (model `grok-build`) authenticated by a **SuperGrok subscription**, not a metered API key — so a Grok workforce can't stall mid-task on out-of-credits. The host `~/.grok/auth.json` is mounted **read-only** into each agent (`GrokCliProvider._append_grok_auth_mount`; `ROBOCO_HOST_GROK_DIR` is the host mount source, set up once with `grok login`). It reaches parity with the Claude path by construction: same MCP gateway + manifest, per-role tool-removal and git-operation deny rules, a prompt-injection guard on the task prompt, headless tool auto-approval, and per-agent token/cost capture from the grok session store. It covers both one-shot delivery roles and the interactive Intake (Prompter) and Secretary chats (per-turn `grok -p` with session resume). **Token auto-refresh.** The grok access token has a fixed ~6h server-set TTL and the CLI cannot refresh it headlessly — on an expired token it hangs forever at an interactive login prompt. The orchestrator mints a fresh token from the offline-access refresh token (xAI's OIDC `refresh_token` grant) before expiry and rewrites the shared `auth.json` in place (`roboco/llm/providers/grok_auth.py` `refresh_if_stale`, run once per dispatch tick; the orchestrator's `~/.grok` mount is read-write so it can rewrite it). As a backstop the agent entrypoint runs `python -m roboco.llm.providers.grok_auth --check` and refuses to start (exit 78) on a missing/expired token instead of hanging. ## Self-Healing & Feature Flags **Self-healing CI loop (default-off).** RoboCo can watch its own repository's CI (a single named workflow) and, on a detected regression, open a fix task that is held out of dispatch until the CEO approves it (it terminates at `awaiting_ceo_approval`), then dispatch it through the normal delivery flow. It is dormant by default and armed by `ROBOCO_SELF_HEAL_ENABLED` plus a second opt-in `ROBOCO_SELF_HEAL_ORIGINATE_ENABLED`; origination is bounded by `ROBOCO_SELF_HEAL_MAX_OPEN_TASKS` / `_MAX_PER_CYCLE` so it can't flood the backlog. It never auto-merges or self-deploys (`roboco/services/self_heal_engine.py`). **Feature flags / company-in-a-box.** Env-gated, default-off subsystems toggle from the panel's Settings → Feature Flags card (`panel/src/components/settings/feature-flags-card.tsx`) instead of hand-editing env: web research (`ROBOCO_RESEARCH_ENABLED`), the strategy engine (`ROBOCO_STRATEGY_ENGINE_ENABLED`), pitch provisioning (`ROBOCO_PROVISIONING_*`), external / internal PR review, the agent-runtime toolchain match (`ROBOCO_TOOLCHAIN_MATCH_ENABLED`), the architectural-conventions standard (`ROBOCO_CONVENTIONS_ENABLED`), and the self-heal flags above. A toggle persists in the settings store and takes effect on the next backend restart; an unset flag falls back to its environment / config default. ## Architectural Conventions Standard **Per-project architectural standard (default-off).** Beyond the `make`-style gates (which check syntax/types/tests, not *where code lives*), each project can carry a repo-canonical `.roboco/conventions.yml` — an architecture map (which definition *kinds* belong in which modules), a toggleable rule set, custom regex rules, and waivers — so an agent cannot land a Pydantic model defined inside a router, a helper in a route file, or a `# noqa` / `# type: ignore`. Gated by `ROBOCO_CONVENTIONS_ENABLED`; fully inert when off. **Effective map.** Consumers read the *effective* map — auto-derived defaults (from a repo scan + `BUILTIN_RULES`) overlaid by the committed file — so behaviour is identical whether the file is present, absent, or partial. `ConventionsService` (`roboco/services/conventions.py`) builds it, caches it per `(project, HEAD sha)` in `project_conventions_cache` (migration `043`), renders the per-task baseline constraints + the ambient prompt block, and scaffolds/restores the file via a PR (`GitService.open_conventions_pr`). The schema lives in `roboco/foundation/policy/conventions/` (pure). **Validator.** A single Python CLI, `python -m roboco.conventions check --root --files ...` (`roboco/conventions/`), uses tree-sitter (Python + TypeScript grammars, shipped in the agent image) to classify each changed definition and flag forbidden placements + hygiene + custom-rule matches as JSONL findings, after waiver filtering. Precision over recall (it abstains when uncertain so a `block` gate can't false-positive-strand a task) and fail-loud (a validator that cannot run exits 3 so the gate blocks, never silently passes). **Threading + enforcement.** The standard reaches the work two ways: an ambient "Architectural Standard" block injected at spawn (`compose_prompt`) and an auto-attached `## Constraints` section on every project task (`TaskService.create`). Enforcement is deterministic: a `block`-level finding refuses `i_am_done` (dev pre-submit) and `pr_pass` (the in-path PR gate) with the offending `file:line` + fix hint; findings also surface in QA's `claim_review` evidence (`convention_findings`). A false positive is relieved by a `waiver` the dev commits in their branch — accountable, reviewed in the PR. The panel's per-project Conventions tab (in the edit-project dialog) shows the map + health and offers Save / Restore. ## Services Core services in `roboco/services/`: | Service | Purpose | |---------|---------| | `TaskService` | Task CRUD and state transitions | | `WorkSessionService` | Git session management, PR lifecycle | | `WorkspaceService` | Multi-agent workspace resolution and cloning | | `ProjectService` | Project/repository management | | `MessagingService` | Channels, sessions, messages | | `NotificationService` | Formal notifications | | `JournalService` | Agent journals and entries | | `OptimalService` | RAG queries (in-house pgvector engine) | | `PermissionsService` | Role-based access control | ## Configuration Key settings in `roboco/config.py` (env prefix: `ROBOCO_`): ```bash # Database ROBOCO_DATABASE_HOST=localhost ROBOCO_DATABASE_PORT=5432 ROBOCO_DATABASE_USER=roboco ROBOCO_DATABASE_PASSWORD=roboco ROBOCO_DATABASE_NAME=roboco # Redis ROBOCO_REDIS_HOST=localhost ROBOCO_REDIS_PORT=6379 # Security (REQUIRED) # Generate with: python -c 'from cryptography.fernet import Fernet; print(Fernet.generate_key().decode())' ROBOCO_ENCRYPTION_KEY= # Workspaces ROBOCO_WORKSPACES_ROOT=/data/workspaces ROBOCO_WORKSPACE_AUTO_CLONE=true ROBOCO_WORKSPACE_CLONE_TIMEOUT=300 # RAG (in-house pgvector engine) ROBOCO_RAG_CHUNK_STRATEGY=fixed ROBOCO_RAG_CHUNK_SIZE=512 ROBOCO_RAG_USE_HYDE=true ROBOCO_RAG_USE_HYBRID_SEARCH=true # AI/LLM ROBOCO_DEFAULT_EMBEDDING_MODEL=qwen3-embedding:0.6b ROBOCO_LOCAL_LLM_MODEL=glm-5:cloud ROBOCO_LOCAL_LLM_BASE_URL=http://roboco-ollama:11434/v1 ROBOCO_OLLAMA_BASE_URL=http://roboco-ollama:11434 ``` ## Docker Deployment ### Container Architecture The system runs as Docker Compose services. All Dockerfiles live under `docker/` at the project root; every service uses `context: .` plus `dockerfile: docker/.Dockerfile`. | Service | Purpose | Healthcheck | |---------|---------|-------------| | `postgres` | PostgreSQL + pgvector | `pg_isready` | | `redis` | Cache, sessions, event bus | `redis-cli ping` | | `ollama` | Local LLM + embeddings | `ollama list` | | `ollama-init` | Pulls models on startup | One-shot | | `agent-base-image` / `agent-*-image` | Pre-built images spawned per agent | One-shot | | `orchestrator` | API + agent spawner | Depends on all above | | `panel` | Next.js control panel (internal, port 3000) | — | | `nginx` | Reverse proxy fronting panel + orchestrator | — | ### Single Entry Point `nginx` is the only externally-exposed service. It listens on `localhost:3000` and routes: - `/api/*` and `/ws/*` → `orchestrator:8000` - everything else → `panel:3000` This avoids CORS since the browser sees one origin. The Next.js code uses relative URLs (`/api`, `/ws`) and lets nginx do the dispatch. ### WebSocket streams The orchestrator exposes WebSocket endpoints under `/ws` (router in `roboco/api/websocket.py`, `ConnectionManager` + `broadcast_*` helpers): | Endpoint | Purpose | |----------|---------| | `/ws/channels/{id}`, `/ws/agents/{id}`, `/ws/sessions/{id}`, `/ws/notifications/{id}` | Per-resource live streams | | `/ws/system` | Operator/system-wide stream (no per-agent keying) — the rate-limit lifecycle (`RATE_LIMIT_HIT` / `RATE_LIMIT_LIFTED`) and live usage (`USAGE_SNAPSHOT`, pushed to the usage dashboard) | Server-side events reach these sockets through `roboco/api/websocket_bridge.py`, which subscribes to the `StreamEventBus` and forwards each event to the matching connections. To add a new live event: define an `EventType` (dotted value), publish it to the bus, add a `_handle_*` forwarder in `websocket_bridge`, and consume it on the panel via the `useWebSocket("/", …)` hook — do not stand up a parallel endpoint or client stack. ### Rate limiting & usage - **Provider rate limits** are tracked in Redis (`RateLimitStateTracker`, `roboco/services/gateway/`). On a provider 429 an agent calls `i_am_blocked(reason="rate_limited")`; the spawn gate then **queues** (never drops) further work for that provider, and a background probe-and-resume loop in the orchestrator clears the limit and revives parked agents when it lifts. - **Provider overloads** reuse the same park-and-probe break. A persistent model-API overload (HTTP 529 / 500 / 503 — the SDK already retries transient ones) parks the provider exactly like a 429 instead of crash-retrying the agent straight back into the overload and burning tokens; the overload is detected orchestrator-side from the dead container's log markers, and the background loop revives the parked work when it recovers. Gated by `ROBOCO_OVERLOAD_BREAK_ENABLED` (default-on). - **Token usage** is captured per agent session from the Claude Code transcript via the SDK server's `/usage/sync` (hook → orchestrator finalize → `agent_spawn_sessions` → `daily_usage_rollups` → dashboard). Cost uses provider-aware pricing in `roboco/billing/pricing.py` (Anthropic priced; local/Ollama intentionally `$0`). The token sweep also publishes `USAGE_SNAPSHOT` to `/ws/system`, so the dashboard's "Token Usage & Cost" panel updates live and falls back to HTTP polling when the stream is down. ### Startup Sequence The startup order is critical due to dependencies: ``` postgres ──┐ redis ─────┼──> ollama ──> ollama-init ──> orchestrator ──> panel ──> nginx │ │ │ │ │ └── Pulls qwen3-embedding:0.6b, glm-5:cloud │ └── Healthcheck: ollama list └── Healthcheck: pg_isready, redis-cli ping ``` **Important timing notes:** 1. `ollama-init` pulls models (~30s for embedding model, ~2min for LLM) 2. Orchestrator waits for models before starting 3. FastAPI lifespan indexes documents using Ollama (~30-60s) 4. Orchestrator polls `/health` until API is ready before starting dispatcher 5. After orchestrator is up, `panel` (Next.js) builds/starts, then `nginx` ### Database migrations Schema changes ship as Alembic migrations under `alembic/versions/`. Run: ```bash docker compose exec orchestrator alembic upgrade head ``` after pulling any change that adds a new migration. ### Ollama Configuration Ollama provides two APIs: - `/v1/*` - OpenAI-compatible API (for LLM chat/completion) - `/api/*` - Native Ollama API (for embeddings, model management) The embedder uses `/api/embed` endpoint with the `qwen3-embedding:0.6b` model. **Environment variables for Docker:** ```bash ROBOCO_LOCAL_LLM_BASE_URL=http://roboco-ollama:11434/v1 # OpenAI-compat ROBOCO_OLLAMA_BASE_URL=http://roboco-ollama:11434 # Native API ``` ### Common Issues | Symptom | Cause | Fix | |---------|-------|-----| | `404 /api/embed` | Model not pulled | Check `docker logs roboco-ollama-init` | | `All connection attempts failed` | API not ready | Orchestrator starts before FastAPI lifespan completes | | Healthcheck failing | Wrong endpoint | Use `ollama list` not `curl` | ## Blueprint Reference The organizational structure, communication matrix, role descriptions, and access-control model are documented inline above and in the user-facing documentation site (MkDocs Material; source under `docs/`, built by `mkdocs.yml`, deployed by `.github/workflows/docs.yml` via GitHub Pages Actions and served at rennf93.github.io/roboco). `docs/rag/` remains the agent-facing RAG corpus (excluded from the published site); the old root `usage.md` / `deployment.md` are now redirect stubs into the site.