mirror of
https://github.com/rennf93/roboco.git
synced 2026-08-03 07:23:24 +02:00
df87fcf059606c0fb7f9863460e50d508ca9913b
7
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
df87fcf059 |
Chore/logical gaps element sweep fixes (#287)
* [sweep] lifecycle: 6 confirmed gaps fixed (cancel-ceo-gate, claim_pr_review gate, needs_team_match, valid_next_verbs narrowing, pr_reviewer unclaim, complete side_effect ordering)
* [chore] logical-gaps: route-layer force gate + privileged-field gate + pre-task audit attribution
tasks.py (5 gaps):
- _HATCH_OVERRIDE_STATES expanded to 7: a privileged PATCH INTO a gate
state (completed/cancelled/awaiting_{qa,documentation,pr_review,
pm_review,ceo_approval}) now requires explicit force — the panel hatch
is no longer a quiet click that drops a task into/out of a human gate.
- _RESURRECT_SOURCE_STATES: a privileged PATCH OUT of a terminal status
(completed/cancelled) resurrects finished work and likewise requires
force, audited as an override.
- _PRIVILEGED_UPDATE_FIELDS gate: a bare task owner (UPDATE_OWN, no
ASSIGN) cannot self-reassign / re-team / re-parent / re-depend /
re-block / rewrite-plan / re-project its task — those structural fields
are PM-gated; the REST surface must not bypass the verb-layer's
reassign/delegate/triage gate. A 403 names the touched fields + the
verb to use instead.
- pre-task create denial: a role that cannot create tasks is now logged
via log_task_creation_denial (distinct task_creation target_type +
attempted payload) instead of a 'N/A' task_id that coerced to NULL and
left the role-escalation attempt unattributable.
audit.py:
- split log_task_action_denial (5-param, under PLR0913) from
log_task_creation_denial (4-param) — the create path has no task_id;
the non-UUID sentinel (N/A) is preserved in details[target_id_raw]
rather than dropped to a NULL target_id indistinguishable from any
other NULL-target denial.
tests:
- test_tasks_routes.py: parametrized admin-override gate (force
required for gate + terminal states, force succeeds).
- test_tasks_route_privileged_fields.py: dev owner 403 on
assigned_to/team/parent_task_id, 200 on dev-facing description.
- test_audit.py: pre-task attribution via log_task_creation_denial +
non-UUID sentinel preservation.
* [chore] logical-gaps: kanban board column coverage + status-class fixes (6 gaps)
models/kanban.py:
- DEV_COLUMNS: cover all 15 lifecycle statuses (was 7; dropped BACKLOG,
PAUSED, VERIFYING, NEEDS_REVISION, AWAITING_PR_REVIEW, AWAITING_PM_REVIEW,
AWAITING_CEO_APPROVAL, CANCELLED). A dev whose task bounced to
needs_revision or sits in a gate used to see their own task vanish.
- PM_COLUMNS: add the gate/revision/paused/cancelled/backlog columns so the
cell PM sees the QA->docs->PR-review->PM-review->CEO chain on its board.
- QA_COLUMNS: drop the 'In Review'->VERIFYING mapping. VERIFYING is the dev's
self-verification (task still with the dev, not with QA); it misrepresented
dev mid-verification as active QA work.
services/kanban.py:
- _build_flat_board: add an 'Other' fallback column for any task whose status
matches no configured column, so total_cards == sum(card_count) and no card
is built-then-silently-dropped (the vanished-card leak).
- get_qa_board: drop VERIFYING from qa_statuses (consistent with the column
change).
- get_documenter_board: scope to task_type=documentation so a dev IN_PROGRESS
code task sharing the cell team no longer appears under 'Gathering'.
- get_main_pm_board_flat: widen the status filter to include PENDING/CLAIMED/
COMPLETED and route those to the incoming/distributed/done columns, which
were structurally always empty under the in-flight-only filter.
tests/integration/test_kanban_service.py: parametrized coverage of every
dropped dev status, PM gate/revision states, QA excludes VERIFYING,
documenter excludes dev code tasks, flat Main PM incoming/distributed/done
populated, and the 'Other' fallback invariant.
* [chore] logical-gaps: lifecycle-enforcement validators + status-class fixes (5 gaps)
enforcement/task_lifecycle.py:
- drop the spurious VERIFYING->awaiting_documentation legacy edge. The
canonical exit is submit_qa -> awaiting_qa -> (qa_pass) ->
awaiting_documentation; the direct edge bypassed the entire QA review hop
(ungated — no role gate existed for it).
- is_waiting_state: add awaiting_pr_review. The PR-review gate parks the PM on
the reviewer; it is a waiting state. The hard-coded set was never updated
when AWAITING_PR_REVIEW was added to the enum, so the gate status was
miscategorized as active.
foundation/_validate_lifecycle.py:
- _check_status_enum_coverage: replace the tautology (STATUS_GRAPH keys every
Status by construction) with a real bidirectional check — every non-terminal
Status is the source of a transition (catches orphan states), and every
source/target referenced is a real Status member (catches stray-string
targets).
- _check_terminal_exits: split the {COMPLETED, CANCELLED} reachability into a
COMPLETED-path requirement + a cancel-exit requirement. The cancel fan-out
made the old check structurally trivial — a status whose sole exit was cancel
passed with no real forward completion path.
- _check_status_enum_parity (new, registered): cross-check spec.Status against
models.base.TaskStatus at import so the ORM column type and the lifecycle
map cannot drift (TaskType had this guard; Status did not).
tests: verifying->awaiting_documentation rejected, self-fail preserved,
awaiting_pr_review is waiting, mutually-disjoint classification invariant,
status enum parity, stray-string-target / orphan-source / cancel-only-exit
validator rejections.
* [chore] logical-gaps: stream-bus poison-pill ACK + dead-letter, periodic reclaim, cancelled-handler marker cleanup (3 gaps)
stream_bus.py:
- _handle_message isolates Event.from_json in its own try/except; an
undecodable payload (unknown EventType, bad UUID/timestamp, malformed
JSON) is dead-lettered then ACKed instead of falling through to the
broad except that only logged — a poison pill stayed pending forever
and re-failed on every reclaim. (gap: stream-bus-malformed-event-poison-pill)
- _reclaim_loop spawned alongside _listen_loop in start_listening (cancelled
in disconnect). XREADGROUP '>' delivers only NEW messages, so a runtime
handler failure left its message pending and unretried until a restart;
the loop re-runs recover_pending every 60s so the idempotency-guarded
replay actually fires. (gap: stream-bus-no-runtime-reclaim-loop)
- _run_handler_guarded marker cleanup catches BaseException so a handler
cancelled mid-flight (asyncio.CancelledError is BaseException-derived
since 3.8) clears its SET-NX marker; otherwise the guard suppressed the
very redelivery that would complete the work. (gap: stream-bus-cancelled-
handler-keeps-idempotency-marker)
TDD: 4 red->green tests in tests/unit/events/test_bus.py.
* [chore] logical-gaps: verb_runner trailing-None side-effect guard + actor_agent_id threading (3 gaps)
_verb_runner.py:
- run_intent skips the side_effects loop when a TRAILING composed action
returned None (its source-status check failed under a concurrent
transition). Previously the loop ran unconditionally on the None task
and _do_push_branch(None)/_do_pr_merge(None) crashed with a
NoneType AttributeError, turning the clean INVALID_STATE the
entry/intermediate guards give into a 500/respawn loop. The trailing
None now flows to the caller's `if task is None` handler. Latent today
(no shipped intent has both a None-capable compose and trailing
side_effects) but the runner is generic. (gap: runner-side-effects-fire-
on-trailing-none-task)
- _do_push_branch / _do_create_pr / _do_create_root_pr forward
actor_agent_id=agent.id into git_service (push_branch / create_pr),
matching _do_pr_merge. Without it, a verb on a task whose assigned_to
was cleared before the side effect falls through to created_by and
pushes from / opens a PR against the wrong workspace.
(gap: side-effect-handlers-drop-actor-agent-id)
- _do_escalate_to_ceo forwards actor_agent_id=agent.id so the
awaiting_ceo_approval audit row attributes to the specific PM/Board
agent. (gap: do-escalate-to-ceo-drops-actor-agent-id)
task.py: escalate_to_ceo gains actor_agent_id param, passed as
audit_agent_id to _validate_and_set_status and recorded as
escalated_by_agent_id in the event payload + log. escalate_to_ceo_for_agent
forwards agent.agent_id.
_impl.py: the main_pm complete->escalate path forwards
actor_agent_id=main_pm_agent_id.
TDD: 5 red->green tests (synthetic trailing-None intent, actor forwarding
for push_branch/create_pr/create_root_pr/escalate_to_ceo) + real-DB audit
test asserting the awaiting_ceo_approval row carries the actor UUID.
Updated 3 board escalate_to_ceo tests to assert the forwarded actor.
* [B-REL] release executor: idempotent half-landed retry + commit-scoped CI + decoupled workflow
Three confirmed gaps in the release fail-closed pipeline (#87/#318/#402):
#87 publish_failed retry duplicates changelog: execute() only short-circuits
on an existing tag. A publish_failed outcome (commit pushed + CI green, no
tag) left no tag, so a retry re-ran apply_version_bumps + write_changelog_entry
(re-inserting the entry above the already-present heading -> duplicate) and
commit_and_push (a second chore(release) commit). Add ReleaseOps
.release_commit_sha(version) detecting a prior release commit on the branch
(clone already at the target version); when present, skip the bump/changelog/
gate/commit pipeline and rejoin the shared CI -> publish tail on the existing
commit. No second commit, no duplicate entry.
#318 wait_for_ci polls branch-latest, not the release commit: a later push to
master during the ~40min wait made the latest run's head_sha != the release
sha forever, exhausting _CI_MAX_POLLS -> false ci_failed on a release whose
own CI was green. Thread head_sha through get_latest_ci_conclusion /
_fetch_latest_ci_run (GitHub actions/runs?head_sha=) so the gate polls the
release commit's own run; a concurrent push can no longer mask it.
#402 release CI gate reuses self_heal_ci_workflow: that setting documents an
empty-string mode for single-workflow repos which, inherited here, degraded
the fail-closed gate to the all-workflows mode git.py itself flags as
unreliable. Add release_ci_workflow (default ci.yml) and _resolve_release_
ci_workflow(); the release gate always resolves a NAMED workflow, never None.
Refactor: bundle the CI-fetch per-project inputs into a _CiRunQuery dataclass
so _fetch_latest_ci_run stays under the arg-count gate; unify the half-landed
path into execute's shared tail (drops a separate _publish_existing, one
return path). TDD red->green; ruff/mypy clean.
* [chore] logical-gaps: a2a service hierarchy gate (typed, unconditional) + persist skill on message row (3 gaps)
create_a2a_notification gated A2A hierarchy only when both ends resolved
(`if from_agent and target_agent:`), so an unattributed (from_agent falsy)
or unresolvable-target request slipped past the hierarchy matrix and
dispatched with from_agent='unknown' / to_agent='' — and a denial came back
as a bare ValueError indistinguishable from the missing-task_id ValueError.
Require both ends present, then validate via the shared typed
validate_a2a_access path (A2AAccessDeniedError + route_hint) so the legacy
notification surface enforces the same who-may-talk-to-whom invariant as the
conversation path.
send() accepts skill= and the gateway callers (qa/doc/pr_gate) pass it
expecting the receiver to learn which capability the message is about, but
send_chat_message never read it from options — silently dropped. Persist a
nullable skill column (migration 054) on a2a_messages, wire it through
send_chat_message + _msg_to_model + the A2AChatMessage model, and fix the
send() docstring (it claimed 'recorded in message metadata').
TDD: 4 red→green (skill recorded on message + surfaces in inbox; permission
denied raises typed A2AAccessDeniedError with route_hint; self-A2A raises
typed; missing from_agent raises instead of silent dispatch). 103 a2a
integration tests green; ruff/mypy clean; migration 054 verified
upgrade/downgrade on throwaway PG.
* [chore] logical-gaps: release-proposal already_published closes proposal + heartbeat-lock-loss cancels execute (2 gaps)
approve() closed the proposal only on status=='published'. A retry that finds
the tag already shipped returns 'already_published' (is_already_published),
so if a prior publish's route commit failed / HTTP 504'd, the proposal stayed
non-terminal forever — every retry returned already_published and never
closed it; only a manual cancel unstuck it. Close on both published and
already_published: the release shipped either way.
_heartbeat_loop returned silently when the lock was no longer owned (a >TTL
Redis outage let the mutex expire mid-execute), leaving executor.execute
running UNGUARDED — a concurrent approve (once Redis returns) could then
acquire the lock and _prepare_release_clone rm -rf the in-flight shared
release clone while the first execute was still mid-run_gate, re-opening the
very rm -rf-clone race the mutex+heartbeat exist to prevent. Run execute as a
task; on lock-loss the heartbeat sets a flag and cancels it, and approve()
turns the CancelledError into a structured 'lock_lost' result (an external
cancellation of approve itself still propagates — distinguished by the flag).
TDD: 2 red→green (already_published → COMPLETED not wedged; heartbeat lock-loss
→ lock_lost + execute cancelled, proposal not completed). 8 concurrency tests
green; ruff/mypy clean.
* [chore] logical-gaps: release approve async dispatch (202) — kill the 40min synchronous HTTP 504
The approve route ran the whole fail-closed execute inline: clone(600s) +
gate(1800s) + CI poll(2400s) + publish(300s) ≈ up to 85min worst case. nginx
(the single :3000 entry point, ~60s read timeout) 504'd long before it
finished, so the CEO's approve always appeared to fail even when the release
succeeded server-side — the structured ReleaseResult was unreachable over the
wire. dispatch_approve spawns the execute in a background task with a fresh
session (built from the request session's engine) and the route returns 202
'accepted' immediately; _INFLIGHT_APPROVES tracks the dispatched task for
observability (self-cleans via done-callback; the Redis mutex still refuses a
double-execute on a second click). The panel already polls GET /proposal every
30s, so it observes the final status (COMPLETED on published/already_published,
else the proposal stays open for retry); the card's approve toast now treats
'accepted' as an info 'dispatched, running in the background' instead of the
old 'Release halted' warning.
TDD: 2 route tests red→green (approve returns 202 'accepted' + the proposal
transitions to COMPLETED / stays PENDING once the background faked execute
completes; the dispatched task is awaited while the executor patch is live).
83 release tests green; ruff/mypy clean; panel typecheck+lint+format+test
green.
* [chore] mcp-servers: normalize exception bodies to Envelope + lift task_id/correlation_id on circuit_open (#232 #359 #57)
flow_server/do_server: the non-404 JSON path returned exception-handler bodies
raw (dict `error` from roboco/generic/http exception handlers, or a 422
`detail` list) — neither is the Envelope wire format the agent is prompted to
trust (string error kind + message + remediate + missing), so on any
service/validation failure the agent got no remediate and flailed until the
breaker tripped. _normalize_exception_envelope lifts the body into a real
Envelope (code -> counted string kind via _classify_dict_error_code, NOT_FOUND
-> not_found, message lifted, remediate synthesized, missing=[]; 422 -> incomplete_input with the validation detail preserved). The synthesized
envelope still flows through the breaker so a 500/422 storm trips it.
_record_and_check_circuit: the circuit_open substitution dropped task_id /
correlation_id from the top level (the SDK's envelope omits them); lift them
from the original rejection so the agent's envelope contract and ops audit-join
of the trip event still work, not just nested in inner.
intake_server._post_event: capture the relay response body under `detail` on
non-success so the grok intake agent gets the real reason (e.g. 'session not in
MegaTask scope' on a 422) instead of an opaque http_422 token with no
remediation.
TDD red->green; ruff + mypy clean; 157 mcp/SDK-breaker tests pass.
* [chore] a2a-routes: authenticate send_message responder + gate cancel task (PM-only) (#116 #423)
send_message took the responder identity from a client-supplied
metadata.from_agent, so any caller could spoof anyone (e.g.
from_agent='ceo') in the task's notes and in the spawn/notification
routed back to the original requester. Stamp the authenticated caller's
slug as the responder instead (CurrentAgentContext).
cancel_task was ungated: no auth dependency and no role check, so any
agent (or any caller) could cancel a task the lifecycle rule reserves to
PM roles (Any -> cancelled: PM roles only) — and the cascade-cancel of
all non-terminal descendants ran with a hardcoded cell_pm role and no
recorded actor. Add require_any_authenticated_agent + a PM-or-above gate,
and thread the authenticated role (into the cascade role gate) and slug
(into the cancellation note) into A2AService.cancel_task.
Tests: send_message ignores a spoofed from_agent and records the
authenticated slug; cancel rejects a developer (403) and a missing auth
header; a PM cancel threads role + slug into the service; the pre-existing
cancel success/already-terminal/not-found tests now run under a PM context
(the success test's body was missing the A2A 'name' field and false-passed
on a 422 — now genuine).
* [chore] work-session-routes: ownership check on mutating routes + stamp merge_pr merged_by from auth (#158 #271)
Every mutating work-session route keyed off session_id alone after the
role gate, so any developer could commit into / abandon / complete a
peer's active session (breaking the single-active-WorkSession invariant
and stranding that task) and any PM could merge any cell's PR — the REST
surface bypassed the verb layer's active-claimant gate entirely. Add a
shared _assert_ownership guard: dev ops require session.agent_id to be
the caller; PM merge_pr requires a cell PM to own the session's task cell
(main PM / CEO / board coordinate every cell), 404 for a missing session.
merge_pr took merged_by from the request body, so any PM could record a
PR merge under another agent's id, corrupting the merge audit trail the
completion/CEO-approval chain and metrics rely on. Drop the body param
and stamp the authenticated caller's agent_id as merged_by (the
MergePRRequest schema is gone with it).
Tests: a second dev's token hitting a peer's /commits and /abandon -> 403
(session left active); a foreign-cell PM -> 403, same-cell PM -> 200; a
spoofed body merged_by is ignored and the persisted row records the PM.
* [chore] ci-watch/dep-update dedupe: normalize git_url + treat empty-string workflow as default (#148 #1267)
The per-repo open-task dedupe filtered ProjectTable.git_url == git_url
(exact), while the orchestrator collapses its poll set by repo_key
(lower / strip trailing '/' / drop '.git'). Two projects whose git_url
differs only by those accidentals (a monorepo's cell-projects, or a
re-registered canonical project) defeated the one-open-task-per-repo
invariant and opened duplicate fix / dep-update tasks. Extract
roboco.utils.converters.repo_key as the single source and match the
dedupe query on its SQL mirror (regexp_replace(rtrim(lower(...)))).
The ci_watch (git_url, workflow) dedupe used func.coalesce(ci_watch_workflow,
default), but SQL COALESCE only substitutes for NULL — a project saved with
ci_watch_workflow='' (reachable via panel/API) yielded coalesce('', default)
= '' != default, so the DB diverged from the engine/orchestrator (which
collapse '' to the default via Python truthiness) and opened a duplicate
fix task every red cycle. Wrap with func.nullif(..., '') so an empty string
collapses to the default too.
Tests: a ''-workflow + NULL-workflow project on one repo dedupe to one task;
git_url accidentals (.git suffix / trailing slash) dedupe across both
ci_watch and dep_update. The orchestrator _repo_key now delegates to repo_key.
* [chore] admin_set_status: attribute the blocked-restore to the admin actor + emit override row (#2176)
admin_set_status taking a BLOCKED task to pending/in_progress with a
pre-block snapshot returned early via _apply_pre_block_restore, which
emitted its audit row with agent_role=None and audit_agent_id=restored_owner
(the pre-block dev) — the admin actor_id/actor_role were dropped entirely.
Because this branch runs with force=false (pending/in_progress aren't hatch
destinations), the distinguishing task.admin_override row (written only on
the non-restore path, gated by force) was never written, so an operator
could silently re-own a blocked task with no trace of who triggered it.
Thread actor_id/actor_role into _apply_pre_block_restore (admin_set_status
passes them with admin_override=True) so the transition audit row attributes
the re-owning to the admin, and emit a task.admin_override row (forced=False,
restore=True) on this branch independent of the force flag. The in-band
unblock(restore=True) path passes no actor and keeps the legacy attribution
(restored owner) with no override row.
Test: admin PATCH status=pending on a BLOCKED task with a snapshot attributes
every audit row to the admin (not the restored dev) and emits the override
row.
* [chore] converters: typed InvalidIdentifierError from require_uuid + log the orchestrator drop (#25)
require_uuid raised a bare ValueError('UUID value cannot be None'), so a
malformed/None identifier propagated as an opaque error callers either let
500 or broad-catch-and-silently-swallow — the orchestrator reaper call site
wrapped it in a bare except-Exception return with NO log, dropping a bad
task_id_str invisibly. Introduce InvalidIdentifierError(ValueError) and
raise it from require_uuid for both None and unparseable input; it stays a
ValueError subclass so existing except-ValueError / except-Exception callers
are unaffected, but typed so a caller can handle a bad identifier distinctly.
The reaper now catches the typed error, logs at warning, and no-ops — the
drop is visible instead of swallowed.
Tests: None and an unparseable string both raise InvalidIdentifierError; it
subclasses ValueError (back-comat).
* [sweep] notification_delivery: list_system_notifications over-fetch-then-slice for pending_ack_only
The SQL limit was applied before the post-fetch 'not fully acked' Python
filter. A window of newer fully-acked ack-required rows filled the limit
and masked older unacked notifications the operator still needs to act on
(the pending-ACK queue silently under-reported; a CEO-approval notification
could be hidden by newer already-acked noise). pending_ack_only now drops
the SQL limit, filters in Python, then slices to limit; the non-pending
branch keeps the SQL limit unchanged.
* [sweep] proactive: drop vestigial code-patterns surface from context package
Code indexing was removed, so _find_code_patterns always returned [] yet
build_context_package still called it, ContextPackage.code_patterns stayed
a live field, _build_summary advertised 'Found N code patterns', and
_count_items counted it — a permanently-empty slot the system claimed to
populate. The dead method, its call, the summary line, and the count
reference are removed. The code_patterns field itself is retained
(always-empty, serialized in to_dict and the optimal route response) for
API/schema back-compat, marked deprecated in its docstring.
* [sweep] migration 052: integration-test the task_cell_projects unique constraint
The UNIQUE(task_id, team) 'one project per cell per task' invariant was
only exercised through SimpleNamespace stubs that never touch a DB
session, so the real Postgres constraint was unverified. If it were
mis-declared or dropped, two same-team rows could coexist and
_resolve_subtask_project would non-deterministically return one, cutting
a subtask's branch/PR against the wrong repo. Adds an integration test
that inserts two same-(task_id, team) rows and asserts IntegrityError on
uq_task_cell_projects_task_team, plus a positive different-teams case.
* [sweep] pr_gate: classify MegaTask root-subtask as root so its root->master PR gets COMMENT (#608)
_post_gate_review_to_pr identified a root->master PR by absence of a
parent_task_id. A MegaTask root-subtask opens its own root->master PR into
the project's master (submit_root, parent='master') but carries
parent_task_id=umbrella, so is_root was False and the gate posted APPROVE
(pr_pass) / REQUEST_CHANGES (pr_fail) instead of COMMENT. The APPROVE could
satisfy a single-approval master branch-protection rule and let a non-CEO
merge via the GitHub UI before the CEO, against the documented invariant
that only the CEO acts on master. is_root now also covers
is_batch_root_subtask (batch_id set + parented); a non-batch cell-PM
coordination root keeps batch_id=None so it stays a cell->root PR
(APPROVE/REQUEST_CHANGES). Extends the _task test helper with a batch_id
kwarg.
* [sweep] enforcement: complete the status-class partition + coverage invariant (#247)
is_waiting_state already covered awaiting_pr_review (the primary fix), but
the doc's coverage invariant was missing: backlog and pending fell through
ALL three predicates (terminal/active/waiting), so a future enum addition
could silently land in no category. is_waiting_state now also covers
pending (waiting for a claim) and backlog (waiting on PM activation), so
is_terminal_state / is_active_state / is_waiting_state partition the whole
Status enum. Adds test_status_classification_covers_every_enum_member
asserting every Status member is classified by exactly one predicate, so
an enum addition that drifts the partition fails the build.
* [chore] test-suite: unblock the quality gate (mypy + 2 behavior fixes)
12 mypy errors across 5 test files: drop banned type:ignore comments
(lifecycle_spec monkeypatch uses cast(Any, ...); the ignores were unused),
wrap SQLAlchemy-typed ids with cast(UUID, ...) for AgentContext / WorkSession
args (AgentTable.id is Mapped[sqla UUID], not uuid.UUID), annotate **kw: Any,
and cast(Any, svc) for a method-assignment mock.
test_cancel_descendants_cascades_for_authorized_pm: the child was parked in
awaiting_ceo_approval, which the spec gates to CEO-only cancel
(lifecycle.py:378-389) — a cell_pm cascade correctly refuses it (the #103
refuse path). Use a PM-cancelable in_progress child so the positive-cascade
assertion holds; the refuse case is already covered by its sibling test.
test_a2a_message_auth: /message/send now resolves the authenticated
responder slug via get_agent_context (a DB lookup, #116). This is a DB-free
unit test of the token gate + route body, so stub get_agent_context in the
fixture — the gate (require_any_authenticated_agent) still runs real and
401s on a missing/forged token before that dependency resolves.
* [chore] complexity: split 5 C-rank blocks to <=B for the xenon gate
No behavior change; each C-rank function factored into a helper so the
complexity gate (xenon --max-absolute B) holds.
- lifecycle.can_invoke_action: extract the team-match check into
_check_team_match.
- a2a.cancel_task: extract _status_value_of + _apply_cancel_note.
- task._apply_pre_block_restore: extract _restore_block_ownership (status/
owner restore + snapshot clear) and _emit_admin_override_audit (#2176).
- release_proposal.approve: extract _finalize_release_lock (heartbeat/
execute cancel + mutex release) out of the finally.
- kanban.get_main_pm_board_flat: dict-dispatch the column routing instead
of a 7-branch if/elif ladder (status wins over team; in-flight + no cell
team falls through to Coordination, #196).
* [chore] lifecycle artifacts: regenerate to match the spec (foundation-check)
The rendered artifacts (docs/rag/lifecycle, panel/lib/lifecycle.json, the
_generated role-prompt fragments) had drifted from the spec — the prior
sweep commits (cancel-CEO gate, claim_pr_review preconditions, pr_reviewer
unclaim, complete merge-first ordering) changed spec data without
regenerating, and the foundation-check render+diff stage never ran because
mypy failed earlier in the gate. make foundation-check now passes.
* [fix] chat: wire live message delivery end-to-end (MESSAGE_SENT)
send_message persisted messages but never broadcast them, there was no
MESSAGE_SENT event type or bridge forwarder, and the panel session view
had no websocket subscription — the live chat path was dead end-to-end.
- add EventType.MESSAGE_SENT and publish it best-effort on every persisted
send (a bus outage logs, never rolls back the durable row)
- bridge _handle_message_event forwards to /ws/sessions/{id} and
/ws/channels/{id}; subscribe it in register_websocket_bridge_handlers
- panel useSessionStream subscribes the session view; the page invalidates
the transcript + session-detail queries on each message.new so the held
(staleTime Infinity) views refresh live without the manual Refresh
* [fix] chat: return session task_links in one read; drop panel N+1
GET /sessions/{id} ran a bare select and session_to_response omitted
task_links, so it always returned them empty — the panel worked around it
with a triple-fetch (get session, get-tasks-for-session which re-fetched
the same endpoint, then a task GET per link), and the links never showed.
- add get_session_with_links(_or_raise) that eager-loads task_links -> task
- add session_to_response_with_links; GET /sessions/{id} uses both
- panel useSession now relies on the single populated response; remove the
dead getTasksForSession + per-task fetch and the unused tasksApi import
* [fix] chat: validate reply_to against the effective session; guard closed-session composer
Posting to a closed session transparently redirects the message to the
group's active session (intended for agents holding stale refs), but
reply_to was validated against the requested session, not the one the
message lands in — letting a cross-session reply slip through — and the
panel silently posted there too, so the message vanished from the view.
- validate reply_to against session.id (the effective, possibly-redirected
session), not req.session_id
- panel: render a "session is closed" notice instead of the composer for a
non-active session; if a send still lands elsewhere (stale status), toast
that it went to the active session rather than letting it appear to vanish
* [fix] chat: close session/group/message read IDOR; fix doubled 404s
get_session and the messages-list took an agent id but never used it, and
get_group took none at all — any authenticated agent could read any private
channel's group, session, and message transcripts. Three NotFoundError sites
also passed a full sentence as resource_type, yielding "... not found not found".
- add require_group_read_access / require_session_read_access (channel
member / silent observer / privileged, mirroring list_group_sessions_for_agent)
and get_session_with_links_for_agent; enforce on GET /sessions/{id},
GET /sessions/{id}/tasks, GET /messages, GET /groups/{id} (-> 403 on deny)
- fix the three doubled-404 sites to the NotFoundError(resource_type, resource_id) form
Also folds two gate fixes for the prior chat commits: cast session.id to UUID
for the reply_to validation, and ruff import/format touch-ups.
Note: POST /messages intentionally still skips the channel write-ACL on the
HTTP (human-CEO/panel) path — the CEO is not in writers for 8/11 channels, so
enforcing it there would block the panel; the gateway/agent path enforces it.
* [fix] secretary: harden live chat — stuck spinner, mid-reply clobber, reload
The Secretary live chat had three live-behaviour bugs: a dropped SSE
connection left a permanent "thinking…" spinner (openStream set no
transport-error handler, so the no-data error Event was swallowed by the
JSON-parse guard and streaming never reset); sending mid-reply wiped the
accumulation buffer and pushed a user message without guarding the in-flight
turn, abandoning/duplicating the reply; and the chat lived only in React
state, so a reload wiped it.
- route the dual-purpose `error` listener: server-sent JSON → handleEvent,
transport error (no data) → reset streaming, surface a notice, close stream
- guard send while streaming (streamingRef); disable the composer Send/Enter
while a reply is in flight
- persist sessionId + messages to localStorage (TTL'd) and, on mount, restore
+ re-attach the stream once the backend confirms the session is still alive
(mirrors the intake/prompter durability)
* [chore] groups: extract group-read helper to keep module rank A
The get_group IDOR access-check added try/except branches that tipped the
module to xenon rank B. Extract the service-error→HTTP mapping into a small
helper so get_group stays lean and the module is rank A again (behaviour
unchanged; covered by the groups route tests).
* [fix] chat: correct panel session-task mutation endpoints
linkTask/unlinkTask posted to /add-task and /remove-task (with a body), but
the backend exposes POST /sessions/{id}/tasks and DELETE
/sessions/{id}/tasks/{task_id} (path param) — so every call 404'd. updateTaskLink
targeted /update-task, a route that does not exist at all. Point linkTask and
unlinkTask at the real routes and drop the phantom updateTaskLink. All three were
unused, so no behaviour changes today — this removes a latent 404 trap.
* [docs] chat: document live message delivery (MESSAGE_SENT / message.new)
Document the live transcript-update path the chat-subsystem fixes wired:
- docs/api/websockets.md: add the message.new event-types row (carried on
/ws/sessions + /ws/channels from EventType.MESSAGE_SENT) and note the
forwarder sets type:"message.new"
- docs/panel/communications-and-journals.md: the session transcript updates
live; a closed session is read-only (composer disabled)
- CLAUDE.md: name message.new on the per-resource streams and make
MESSAGE_SENT the worked example of the add-a-live-event recipe
The internal roboco_map slices (gitignored) were updated in place to match.
* [docs] reconcile published docs with code since v0.13.0
Drift caught by the doc-reconciliation pass (all verified against HEAD):
- CLAUDE.md + rag: pr_reviewer gained the unclaim verb (
|
||
|
|
2bd35e1c9e |
fix(run-hardening): stop three blocked-task respawn loops (#253)
* fix(run-hardening): stop three blocked-task respawn loops
Three independent fixes for blocked-task respawn loops observed in the live
run (the bleeders behind a wedged near-complete run):
- verb runner: re-check the working task after EACH composed atomic action,
not just at entry. A concurrent transition between a verb's precondition
gate and execution (e.g. a racing i_am_blocked moving a root from
needs_revision to blocked) made claim() return None mid-sequence; the next
composed step dereferenced None.id and crashed with the opaque
"'NoneType' object has no attribute 'id'", looping the PM. Now fails fast
with an actionable INVALID_STATE; the savepoint rolls the partial run back.
- blocker dispatch: never dispatch a Board role (product-owner / head-
marketing) as a blocker resolver. Board roles have no unblock verb, so the
dispatcher respawned one forever to "resolve" a blocker it could only
notify/triage about — one incident burned ~6400 tool calls on a single
mis-owned root. _blocker_resolver_slug now returns None for a Board
assignee so the dispatch skips it.
- git push: recover a missing local task-branch ref from origin/<branch>
before push-by-name. A re-provisioned shared clone can lack the branch
locally though its commits are on origin, so push died on
"src refspec <branch> does not match any" and the task wedged at i_am_done.
Now materializes the ref (no-op push when already on origin) or fails loud
with an unclaim+reclaim instruction when the work is on neither.
Adds regression tests for all three. Full no-DB gate green (ruff, reflow,
mypy, xenon); pytest+coverage validated by CI.
* fix(verb-runner): only raise on an INTERMEDIATE composed None, not the last
The mid-composition None-guard was too aggressive: it raised for a None
returned by the LAST composed action too (e.g. start()), preempting the
caller's existing `if task is None` handler that surfaces the verb-specific
message ("start failed for task ...", the board verb's decline envelope).
Three tests asserting those messages broke in CI.
Only an INTERMEDIATE None is fatal (the next action would deref None.id). A
None from the last action is the verb's own result and must flow out as the
runner's return value. Guard now fires only for position > 0, before the
next dispatch — still prevents the crash, preserves the last-action contract.
* fix(escalation): never hand a Main-PM coordination root to the Board
The upstream cause of the board catch-22 (which the orchestrator-side
blocker-dispatch guard only backstopped): the escalation chain points
main-pm -> product-owner, and i_am_blocked/escalate REASSIGNS the task to
that chain target. apply_escalation's board-advisory guard only refused
descendant cell tasks (both predicates require parent_task_id), so a
top-level Main-PM coordination root slipped through and the whole root was
reassigned to the Product Owner + marked blocked. The board has no unblock
verb, so it spam-notified the CEO and respawn-looped (~6400 tool calls on
one root).
Add _is_coordination_task (team == main_pm — covers a delivery root AND a
MegaTask root-subtask) and a shared _board_cannot_own predicate, applied at
all four board-refusal sites (escalation, reassign, reassign_active_claim,
dependency-revival). A main_pm coordination task escalated/reassigned onto a
board role is now diverted to the pool for a role-matched (Main-PM) reclaim.
Complements the blocker-dispatch backstop in the prior commits (defense in
depth). Tests: coordination-root predicate cases + apply_escalation divert;
existing teamless-root / board-root behavior unchanged.
---------
Co-authored-by: Renn F <rennf93@users.noreply.github.com>
|
||
|
Renn F
|
855e4aea54 |
fix(gateway): guard the verb runner against a None task/agent
The runner's atomic steps dereference task.id / agent.id with no None-check, so a verb invoked when the task or agent could not be resolved crashed with a cryptic "'NoneType' object has no attribute 'id'" (observed on i_will_plan for a task forced into an unexpected state out-of-band). Fail fast at run_intent's entry with an actionable INVALID_STATE error instead. |
||
|
|
5fe1e6df58 |
feat: in-path PR-review gate — per-cell + main reviewers (#229)
* feat(lifecycle): add the in-path PR-review gate status + reviewer verbs
Insert awaiting_pr_review between the assembled-PR submit and the PM merge,
giving the merge level the rejection capability it structurally lacks — today
only qa_fail and ceo_reject ever reach needs_revision, so a PM review is a
merge button with no teeth.
- New Status awaiting_pr_review + submit_for_review / pr_pass / pr_fail actions
(pr_pass -> awaiting_pm_review, pr_fail -> needs_revision, mirroring the QA gate).
- Reviewer verbs claim_gate_review / pr_pass / pr_fail, and a main-PM submit_root
verb (the root analogue of the cell PM's submit_up; opens the root->master PR).
- Extend the self-review-symmetry validator to the new sign-off actions.
- Mirror the value into the ORM TaskStatus enum + the A2A state map, and add the
postgres taskstatus enum value (migration 040, forward-only like 037).
- Regenerate the per-role verb tables; add gate spec tests.
Spec surface only; the gateway methods + dispatch are wired in follow-ups, so the
verbs are advertised but dormant (flow_server tolerates unregistered verbs).
* feat(identity): add the three cell PR-review-gate reviewers
The in-path gate needs a reviewer per cell so each cell's assembled cell->root
PR is reviewed by a stack-specialized agent, while pr-reviewer-1 serves the
root->master gate (and keeps doing inbound external PRs).
- be/fe/ux-pr-reviewer: PR_REVIEWER role, team-scoped (so dispatch routes each
cell's gate to its own reviewer); seeded identities + ROLE_TEAM_RULES + names.
AI agent count 22 -> 25.
- They reuse the existing roboco-agent-pr-reviewer image (AGENT_IMAGES maps the
three slugs to it, as be-dev-1/-2 share one image) — no new image.
- Tracing table: pr_pass/pr_fail require a learning entry (parity with
post_pr_review), submit_root mirrors submit_up, claim_gate_review is waived
(its tracing applies on pr_pass/pr_fail) — completes the verb surface added
in the prior commit.
- Update the roster-pinning identity tests.
* feat(gateway): wire the in-path PR-review gate end to end
Make the assembled-PR review gate operational across the choreographer, the
TaskService transitions, and the v1 flow surface.
- TaskService: submit_for_review (in_progress→awaiting_pr_review), pr_gate_claim
(no-transition reviewer claim), pr_pass (→awaiting_pm_review), pr_fail
(→needs_revision); mirror qa_pass/qa_fail (clear claim, actor-mismatch warn,
issues appended for the PM's revision). VerbRunner gains the matching atomic
handlers + a create_root_pr side effect.
- Repoint submit_up to compose submit_for_review (cell→root PR enters the gate),
and add a main-PM submit_root verb (opens the root→master PR, enters the gate).
- Split main_pm_complete: a code root must pass the gate first (requires
awaiting_pm_review; rejects an in_progress code root toward submit_root and no
longer reopens the PR), while a branchless coordination root still walks
straight through, ungated.
- PRGateMixin (claim_gate_review / pr_pass / pr_fail) composed onto the
Choreographer; flow_server forwarders + v1 routes (pr_reviewer + main_pm) +
request schemas.
- Tests: gate spec + the updated submit_up / main_pm_complete expectations + new
real-DB integration tests driving submit_for_review→pr_gate_claim→pr_pass and
pr_fail through the real enforcement layer.
* feat(orchestrator): dispatch the in-path PR-review gate
Make the gate live in the dispatch loop.
- _dispatch_pr_gate_work: route awaiting_pr_review tasks to reviewers by level —
a cell→root task to its cell reviewer (be/fe/ux-pr-reviewer), the root→master
task to pr-reviewer-1. The reviewer self-claims via claim_gate_review (no
pre-claim, mirroring the external-PR dispatcher); registered in
_dispatch_all_work. _select_agent_for_cell learns the pr_reviewer role.
- _build_pr_gate_prompt: anchors the reviewer to the parent objective + full
acceptance criteria + the FE<->BE contract, then pr_pass / pr_fail.
- _readiness_check_role_for_status: awaiting_pr_review -> pr_reviewer.
- Fail routing: pr_fail reassigns the failed assembled task to its PM
(_revision_pm_for_task: cell PM for a cell team, Main PM for the root), and the
revision dispatcher is generalized from coordination-roots-only to any
PM-owned needs_revision task so the gate-failed task is re-coordinated instead
of deadlocking.
* docs: document the in-path PR-review gate + the cell reviewers (22→25)
Reflect the shipped gate across the canonical + RAG docs.
- CLAUDE.md: agent count 22→25, the cell reviewers in the org chart, an
awaiting_pr_review state + the gate transitions + a gate note in the lifecycle
section, and submit_root / claim_gate_review / pr_pass / pr_fail in the verb
surface table.
- docs/rag/architecture: org-structure (count, cell-reviewer roster, cells
table), agent-uuids (be/fe/ux-pr-reviewer rows), agent-model (role + team
rows).
- docs/rag/roles/pr-reviewer: the in-path gate section + the gate verbs.
- Wrap reviewer.id with UUID(str(...)) in the gate DB tests for mypy.
* docs: finish the gate doc sweep across README + RAG + generated artifacts
Catch the remaining surfaces beyond the canonical docs.
- README + how-to: agent count 22→25, the 6-agent cells (+ PR Reviewer), the
main reviewer's root→master gate role.
- RAG: permissions + tool-permissions + task-tools list the gate verbs
(claim_gate_review / pr_pass / pr_fail) for pr_reviewer; regenerate the
lifecycle artifacts (intent-verbs, status-transitions, the per-role
lifecycle-*.md prompts, panel lifecycle.json) from the spec via
build_lifecycle_artifacts.py so they carry the new status + verbs.
* fix(migration): shorten the 040 revision id to fit alembic_version VARCHAR(32)
The revision id '040_taskstatus_awaiting_pr_review' is 33 chars; alembic's
alembic_version.version_num column is VARCHAR(32), so recording the migration on
a real 'alembic upgrade head' failed with 'value too long for type character
varying(32)' (surfaced on the NAS deploy). The test suite missed it: the test DB
is built via Base.metadata.create_all and the parity test only renders SQL
offline, so nothing actually applied the migration chain.
- Rename to '040_awaiting_pr_review' (22 chars).
- Add a guard test asserting every revision id fits the VARCHAR(32) column.
- Verified by applying the full chain 001->040 against real Postgres: it now
reaches head and records '040_awaiting_pr_review' without truncation.
* fix(migration): land the actual 040 revision-id shortening + guard test
The prior commit captured only the file rename (git add aborted on the deleted
old path), leaving the long revision id and missing the guard test. This commit
carries the real content: revision id '040_awaiting_pr_review' (22 chars) and the
revision-id length guard. Re-verified against real Postgres — the full chain
reaches head and records the short id without truncation.
* fix(product): flush cell deletes before inserts when re-mapping projects
Editing a product's cell->project map (PATCH /api/products/{id}) 409'd with
'duplicate key value violates unique constraint uq_product_projects_product_team'
whenever a team already had a mapping. _replace_cells clears the old rows and
appends the new ones, but within a single flush SQLAlchemy orders INSERTs before
DELETEs for the same table, so the new (product_id, team) rows collided with the
not-yet-deleted old ones. Flush the deletes first.
Pre-existing bug (unrelated to the PR-review gate); surfaced on the NAS. New
real-Postgres regression test re-maps all three cells to different projects —
it fails with the unique violation without the fix and passes with it. The
existing update test only changed WHICH team was mapped, so it never collided.
* fix(gateway): let main_pm submit_root past the shared submit-up guard
submit_root reused the cell PM's _submit_up_ownership_guard, which
hardcoded agent.role != cell_pm and rejected the Main PM with
"submit_up is reserved for cell_pm". A branch-bearing code root could
then never close: submit_root bounced to complete, while complete
required awaiting_pm_review (reachable only via submit_root) and bounced
back — a circular rejection.
Both callers already run the spec gate (can_invoke_intent), which
enforces submit_up→cell_pm and submit_root→main_pm, so the guard's role
re-check was redundant for submit_up and wrong for submit_root. Broaden
it to accept either PM role as a defense-in-depth non-PM reject.
Adds the first choreographer-level submit_root test (the gap that let
this ship).
* fix(gateway): proactively steer both PMs to their bubble-up verb
The submit_root deadlock had a sibling steering gap: nothing told a PM
which verb opens the gate. The delegate next-hint said only 'i_am_idle
when done', and complete's in_progress rejection named submit_root for
the Main PM but left the Cell PM with a bare 'not ready for completion'
— no submit_up pointer, the same guess-the-verb trap.
- delegate hint now names the role-correct verb (root → submit_root,
cell parent → submit_up) proactively, before any rejection.
- cell_pm_complete's in_progress rejection now steers to submit_up,
mirroring the Main PM's submit_root gate hint.
Tests cover both the cell-PM steer and the role-aware delegate hint.
* docs: correct who-merges-which-PR across the gate docs + complete description
Audit of the gate docs found the merge actors mis-stated in several
places — the exact ambiguity that risks 'the reviewer/PM merges the root
PR' confusion:
- complete IntentSpec description said 'Main PM merges root PR' — false;
main_pm_complete escalates and the CEO merges root→master. Corrected
(propagated to intent-verbs.md, lifecycle.json, generated role prompts
via build_lifecycle_artifacts.py).
- task-tools.md: submit_up target was awaiting_pm_review (should be
awaiting_pr_review); Main PM flow had no submit_root — added it.
- README.md: lifecycle diagram now shows the awaiting_pr_review gate.
- cell-pm.md / main-pm.md: dropped the stale 'submit_up hands work to the
Main PM who merges your cell branch' model — the cell PM merges its own
gated cell→root PR; the Main PM owns the root + submit_root; the CEO
merges master. Added submit_root to the main-pm manifest.
- git-commits.md, pr-creation.md, tool-permissions.md, git-tools.md:
stopped attributing root→master PR opening to complete (it's submit_root).
No behavior change; verb wiring + state machine verified gap-free this
session (the pr_fail→needs_revision→PM respawn loop closes correctly).
* fix(orchestrator): stop closure respawn waiting the reaper window
A PM that finished its subtasks and idled left its parent 'paused' with a
fresh last_heartbeat_at. _is_recently_paused gated closure respawn on
_claim_heartbeat_ttl — the REAPER window (stale_claim_reap_seconds: 600s
default, 1800s on the NAS) — so the parent sat untouched for up to 10-30
minutes before its PM was respawned to close it. The whole chain stalled
behind it.
The race that guard actually protects against (i_am_idle auto-pauses, then
the agent is marked IDLE + its container tears down) is seconds, and the
live-session case is already covered by _is_agent_active. Introduce a
dedicated short debounce (pm_closure_recently_paused_seconds, default 45s)
and gate closure on that instead.
The existing test fixture masked this by setting _claim_heartbeat_ttl to
claim_stale_seconds (180s), not the production reaper value. Fixture now
mirrors production; adds a regression test that a parent paused past the
debounce but within the reaper window respawns immediately.
* feat(gate): post the in-path review verdict on the assembled PR
The in-path gate previously left no trace on the PR it gated — pr_pass /
pr_fail were pure status transitions. Now each verdict is posted as a
GitHub review on the assembled PR itself (server-side, bot account), so
the decision is visible on the very PR the PM merges.
- pr_pass → APPROVE, pr_fail → REQUEST_CHANGES on a cell→root PR.
- The root→master PR ALWAYS gets a plain COMMENT, never APPROVE/REQUEST_
CHANGES: only the CEO acts on master, so the gate must never leave an
approval that could satisfy branch protection (letting someone else
merge) nor a blocking review that could impede the CEO's merge.
- Best-effort and AFTER the DB transition — a GitHub failure is logged,
never rolls back the gate decision. Reuses git.post_pr_review's existing
self-review→COMMENT downgrade for the org's own PRs.
Adds _project_slug_for to the ChoreographerHelpers protocol (mypy) and a
unit suite covering event selection, the master-bound COMMENT rule, the
no-PR skip, and failure-swallowing. Docs updated (pr-reviewer, task-tools).
---------
Co-authored-by: Renn F <rennf93@users.noreply.github.com>
|
||
|
Renn F
|
32b6b31dd6 |
fix(gateway): PR base/target is the parent task's branch, not derived
submit_up opened the cell->root PR with a base computed by merge_chain.parent_branch_for, which drops the last --segment but REUSES the child's team prefix. Across a team boundary (cell feature/backend/ROOT--CELL -> root feature/main_pm/ROOT) that yields a ref that does not exist on the remote, so GitHub rejects the PR with 422 base: invalid and the cell parent wedges. Resolve the base/target from the parent task's authoritative branch_name (what branch creation already cuts each child from), via a shared VerbRunner._parent_branch_for helper used by _do_create_pr and _do_pr_merge. Falls back to parent_branch_for only when there is no parent (root->master -> master) or it has no branch yet. The leaf->cell path is unchanged (same team). Latent since the merge chain landed; first run to reach cell-PM bubble-up exposed it after #180. |
||
|
Renn F
|
c78395f9fc |
fix(gateway): submit_up opens cell PR before the pm-review transition
submit_up composed submit_pm_review (atomic) then create_pr (side
effect), but VerbRunner.run_intent runs all composes before any side
effect. submit_pm_review rejects without a PR (returns None), then
create_pr deref'd the None task -> 'NoneType has no attribute
branch_name', wedging cell-PM bubble-up in a respawn loop.
Add IntentSpec.pre_side_effects, run before composes. submit_up now
opens the cell->root PR first (persisting pr_number), so submit_pm_review
re-fetches and passes its pr_created gate. Mirrors the dev open_pr ->
i_am_done split. Latent since the lifecycle spec (
|
||
|
|
207aaecd72 |
Feature: lifecycle canonical spec (#14)
* chore: clean make quality baseline on feature/lifecycle-canonical-spec
Three classes of pre-existing issues blocking `make quality`:
1. Alembic migrations 002/009/011 used runtime introspection
(op.get_bind() + inspect / bind.execute) without guarding for
offline (--sql) mode. `alembic upgrade head --sql` is part of
`make quality`; in offline mode `op.get_bind()` returns a
MockConnection with no inspection system, so the migrations
crashed before emitting their SQL stubs. Each migration now
short-circuits or simplifies in `context.is_offline_mode()` —
live-DB behavior is unchanged.
2. ruff format drift on three files left over from prior in-flight
edits (choreographer/_impl.py, content_actions.py, and one test
file). `ruff format` applied.
3. vulture flagged two unused `tb` parameters in async __aexit__
stubs in test_task_service_lifecycle_misc.py. The parameter is
protocol-required but unused by the body — renamed to `_tb`
(vulture treats underscore-prefixed names as intentionally unused).
`make quality` is now green from this branch's HEAD; subsequent
lifecycle-spec work can use it as the per-task gate.
* feat(lifecycle): canonical spec package + Role/Status/TaskType enums
Foundation for the canonical lifecycle/permissions module. Enums
mirror docs/internal/old/workflows/STATUS_TRANSITIONS.md +
PERMISSIONS.md. Tests pin enum membership against both the
predecessor canon and roboco.models.base.TaskType.
* feat(lifecycle): Decision dataclass with allow/reject/tracing_gap constructors
Single rejection shape every consumer maps to its native format
(Envelope, HTTP code, prompt hint). __post_init__ enforces the
allowed/rejection_kind invariants so a malformed Decision can't reach
a consumer.
* fix(lifecycle): tighten Decision invariants per Task 2 review
Two reviewer findings on the Task 2 Decision dataclass, addressed
in one commit:
1. The docstring promised `allowed=True ⇒ rejection_kind is None
AND missing == [] AND remediate is None`, but __post_init__ only
checked the rejection_kind half. A caller could construct an
allow-shaped Decision with stale missing/remediate fields and
sneak it past validation. Tighten __post_init__ to enforce the
full invariant. Add a regression test.
2. tracing_gap defensively copies the missing list (`list(missing)`)
to isolate the stored list from later caller-side mutation, but
no test pinned this. Add a regression test that mutates the source
list after construction and asserts the stored list is unchanged.
Issue 2 from the same review (mutable list vs tuple for `missing`)
is a broader design call deferred until consumers exist; the
defensive copy is sufficient until then.
* feat(lifecycle): Precondition/ActionSpec/IntentSpec/StatusTransition dataclasses
The four dataclasses that hold the canonical tables. ActionSpec and
StatusTransition are direct ports of pre-gateway PERMISSIONS.md +
STATUS_TRANSITIONS.md rows. IntentSpec is the gateway-only addition:
each gateway intent verb declares which atomic actions it composes.
* feat(lifecycle): _STATUS_TRANSITIONS table + STATUS_GRAPH view
Direct port of STATUS_TRANSITIONS.md. Every transition records its
trigger action and (optionally) a role constraint. STATUS_GRAPH is
the precomputed source→{targets} view callers use for reachability
checks.
* fix(lifecycle): pin role_constraint values + clarify Task-5 handoff
Two reviewer findings on Task 4 _STATUS_TRANSITIONS, addressed in
one commit:
1. The original Task-4 tests verified (source, target) pairs but
not role_constraint contents. A typo in a single role name (e.g.
forgetting MAIN_PM from escalate_to_ceo) would have slipped past
them silently. Add test_status_transitions_role_constraints_match_canon
pinning every non-None constraint and the cancel-block invariant.
2. role_constraint=None on the `claim` rows from PENDING and
NEEDS_REVISION was load-bearing — it is the explicit handoff
point between the StatusTransition table (state machine layer)
and CLAIM_RULES (per-role claim authority, lands in Task 5).
The original inline comment said this in passing; expand it so
the design choice is unmissable for a stranger reading just
spec.py.
* feat(lifecycle): _ATOMIC_ACTIONS + CLAIM_RULES + ROLE_TEAM_RULES tables
Direct port of PERMISSIONS.md. Every task management tool gets an
ActionSpec with allowed_roles, source_statuses, target_status,
self_review_block, and needs_team_match flags. CLAIM_RULES maps each
Role to the statuses they can claim from. ROLE_TEAM_RULES is the
per-slug team restriction.
* fix(lifecycle): tighten ActionSpec contracts per Task 5 review
Three reviewer findings on Task 5's _ATOMIC_ACTIONS table, addressed
in one commit:
1. set_plan.source_statuses widened to {CLAIMED, IN_PROGRESS} but
every existing caller (i_will_work_on / i_will_plan compositions)
runs set_plan while CLAIMED, between claim and start. Narrow to
{CLAIMED} only. If a future "edit plan mid-flight" feature lands,
widen explicitly with test coverage at that time.
2. needs_team_match was set True only on claim/qa_pass/qa_fail/
docs_complete. Defense-in-depth says every role-scoped task
action should re-assert team match (don't rely on the inheritance
chain through assigned_to alone). Flip to True on: start,
set_plan, block, pause, submit_verification, submit_qa,
submit_pm_review, complete, create_subtask. Leave False on
board/CEO actions and PM cross-cell interventions (unblock,
resume, cancel) where the cross-cell semantics are intentional.
3. claim.source_statuses is intentionally a SUPERSET of any single
role's CLAIM_RULES allowance (the table holds the union; CLAIM_RULES
holds the per-role authority). Add an inline comment above the
claim ActionSpec so a future reader doesn't conclude the two
tables disagree — they don't, they encode overlapping facts at
different grains.
* feat(lifecycle): _INTENT_VERBS table — every gateway verb declared
Each gateway intent verb is now a named composition of atomic actions
plus optional side effects. i_will_work_on = (claim, set_plan, start);
i_am_done = (submit_verification, submit_qa); open_pr is pure side
effects (push_branch, create_pr); etc.
* fix(lifecycle): widen block.allowed_roles to include QA + Documenter
Task 6 review caught a role-set inconsistency: i_am_blocked.allowed_roles
admits dev/QA/doc, but the underlying block.allowed_roles only allowed
dev+PM. Result: a QA or documenter calling i_am_blocked would pass the
IntentSpec gate and then be rejected by the composed ActionSpec gate
when Task 7 wires can_invoke_intent.
Widen block to include QA + Documenter. The semantic case is sound: a
QA reviewing a task can discover an external blocker; a documenter
writing docs may need PM intervention. Predecessor PERMISSIONS.md
restricted block to dev+PM, but with the gateway exposing i_am_blocked
to all worker roles, the underlying atomic must agree.
The deeper unclaim/escalate_up "imperative verb" concern from the same
review (composes=() but mutates state) is deferred to Task 8 where the
validator design lands.
* feat(lifecycle): public lookup functions + Context + preconditions
can_claim, can_invoke_action, can_invoke_intent, valid_next_verbs,
composed_actions_for, intents_for_role, status_after — the entire
public surface every consumer will use. Context carries the
caller-supplied state preconditions need (plan, journal-decision
flag, etc.). Preconditions for plan/commits/no_pr/ownership are
declared once and wired into the relevant IntentSpecs.
* fix(lifecycle): wire PRECONDITION_OWNERSHIP through Context.actor_id
Task 7 review found _p_owns_task reads agent.id but every call site
passes None for the agent arg. Result: getattr(None, "id", object())
returns a fresh sentinel, task.assigned_to == <sentinel> is always
False, and open_pr / i_am_done would reject every owner the moment
Task 9 wires consumers.
Fix: thread identity through Context.actor_id (new UUID field) and
rewrite _p_owns_task to read from the context. Both call sites already
pass the Context — no signature changes elsewhere. Add green-path
test exercising the owner-can-open-pr case the existing tests
missed (the Task 7 plan only tested precondition-failure paths,
which masked the bug).
Plus surface hygiene: STATUS_GRAPH, CLAIM_RULES, ROLE_TEAM_RULES,
and the four PRECONDITION_* constants are now in
roboco.lifecycle.__init__.__all__ so consumers in Tasks 8/9 don't
depend on the implicit `from roboco.lifecycle.spec import ...`
backdoor.
* feat(lifecycle): import-time self-consistency validators
10 validators run at module import; first failure raises
LifecycleSpecError and prevents the package from loading. Covers
status enum coverage, reachability, terminal exits, intent
compositions, status chain consistency, claim-rule role/status
coverage, self-review symmetry, team-rule slug existence, and
StatusTransition action references.
* fix(lifecycle): close validator gaps; resolve BACKLOG-claim and submit_qa IN_PROGRESS-shortcut ambiguity
Three reviewer follow-ups on Task 8's _validate.py, plus two real
data corrections the new action-target-reachability validator
surfaced.
1. Design spec §9 calls for "every ActionSpec.target_status, when
set, is reachable from each source_status via STATUS_GRAPH" —
missing from Task 8's 10 validators. Add
_check_action_target_reachable_from_source.
2. _check_role_team_rules_slugs verified slug existence in
AGENT_UUIDS but NOT that the cell team in ROLE_TEAM_RULES
matches the seed. Add _check_role_team_rules_team_match,
scoped to non-None entries only — None means "exempt from
team-match enforcement" (cross-cell roles), not "no team in
org chart".
3. test_validators_pass_on_real_spec was ceremonial. Add
test_run_all_validators_raises_on_unknown_intent_action,
a deliberate-break regression that monkeypatches _INTENT_VERBS
to inject a fake action and asserts LifecycleSpecError raises.
The new action-target-reachability validator caught two real
data inconsistencies between the predecessor canon docs and the
spec tables:
A. claim.source_statuses listed BACKLOG and CLAIM_RULES[*PM]
listed BACKLOG, but STATUS_GRAPH[BACKLOG] = {PENDING, CANCELLED}
only. Resolution: PMs use the explicit \`activate\` action to
move BACKLOG → PENDING, then claim from PENDING. Drop BACKLOG
from claim.source_statuses and CLAIM_RULES.
B. submit_qa.source_statuses listed IN_PROGRESS, but
STATUS_GRAPH[IN_PROGRESS] does NOT include AWAITING_QA. The
intent verb i_am_done composes (submit_verification, submit_qa)
which forces IN_PROGRESS → VERIFYING → AWAITING_QA — no
shortcut. Drop the stale IN_PROGRESS entry from
submit_qa.source_statuses.
Both corrections tighten the canonical state machine to a strict
no-skip transition graph. Pre-gateway PERMISSIONS.md/STATUS_TRANSITIONS.md
disagreements are resolved here; spec.py is the canon now.
* feat(gateway): Envelope.from_decision maps lifecycle Decisions to envelopes
Single shape adapter so verb bodies stop hand-composing rejection
envelopes. Each rejection_kind maps to a specific envelope flavor;
'self_review' folds into 'not_authorized' with a parenthetical hint;
constructing from an allow Decision raises (programmer error).
* feat(gateway): VerbRunner for atomic composed-action dispatch
Wraps spec.composed_actions_for(intent) in session.begin_nested()
so mid-sequence failures roll the DB back. Side effects run AFTER
the savepoint commits. Each atomic action name dispatches to a
TaskService method via a single, exhaustive _dispatch_atomic
mapping. New verbs slot in by adding an IntentSpec entry + a
_dispatch_atomic case if a new atomic is needed.
* refactor(gateway): i_will_work_on uses spec.can_invoke_intent + VerbRunner
Replace the bespoke status-branch dispatcher in i_will_work_on with the
spec-driven flow: load task -> load agent -> build spec.Context ->
spec.can_invoke_intent (and spec.can_claim for per-role status authority)
-> Envelope.from_decision on rejection -> VerbRunner.run_intent on success.
The _i_will_work_on_pending, _i_will_work_on_claimed,
_i_will_work_on_needs_revision, and _start_failed_envelope helpers are
removed; the runner replaces them. Two narrow verb-body re-entry blocks
remain for behaviors the spec does not yet model:
1. in_progress + same agent -> idempotent heartbeat-only return
2. claimed + same agent -> _resume_from_claimed (set_plan + start)
to recover from a stuck mid-claim crash without re-running claim
against a state the spec excludes.
The behavioral claim guards (already_active / paused / sibling_sequence)
also stay imperative for now -- they're not in the spec yet and migrate
into spec.extra_preconditions in a later task. Per-role claim authority
is enforced via spec.can_claim because the atomic claim action's
source_statuses are the union across roles; CLAIM_RULES narrows.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py runs the verb
against every (role x status x task_type='code') combo (112 rows) and
asserts the envelope error matches the spec's Decision (or can_claim's
Decision when the intent gate passes but per-role claim authority does
not). This is the contract that makes spec/verb drift impossible.
Existing tests updated where rejection-message text changed (the spec
now produces the messages, e.g. "role 'cell_pm' may not call
'i_will_work_on'" instead of "PM cannot execute code") or where the
spec's stricter view ("invalid_state" -> "not_authorized" for a dev
trying to claim awaiting_qa) is more accurate. Test fixtures were
updated to wire task.session.begin_nested as a proper async context
manager (required by VerbRunner) and to set agent_for().id so runner-
driven calls line up with assert_awaited_with(task_id, agent_id).
* refactor(lifecycle): push CLAIM_RULES enforcement into can_invoke_action
Task 11's i_will_work_on migration had to call spec.can_claim()
separately after spec.can_invoke_intent() because the claim action's
source_statuses is the union across all claim-eligible roles —
can_invoke_intent alone would let a developer pass for claiming
awaiting_qa (a QA-only state).
The retrofit pattern would repeat in every claim-composing verb
(i_will_plan, claim_review, claim_doc_task). Push the per-role
narrowing inside can_invoke_action when the action is "claim",
using the same not_authorized vs invalid_state disambiguation
can_claim already implemented (status-reserved-for-another-role
returns not_authorized; status-no-role-can-claim returns
invalid_state). Extracted the body to _check_claim_rules_narrow
to keep can_invoke_action under xenon's complexity threshold.
Update _i_will_work_on_gate to drop the redundant spec.can_claim
call. Update test_consumer_parity.py to assert only against
can_invoke_intent's Decision.
Tasks 12-22 will inherit the cleaner pattern: spec.can_invoke_intent
is the single gate; verb bodies don't need per-action retrofits.
* refactor(gateway): i_will_plan uses spec.can_invoke_intent + VerbRunner
Migrates i_will_plan to the spec-driven pattern Task 11 set up for
i_will_work_on. The verb body now: (1) loads task + agent, (2) builds
Context, (3) checks idempotent/recovery re-entry, (4) calls
spec.can_invoke_intent, (5) returns Envelope.from_decision on
rejection, (6) delegates composition to VerbRunner. The
_i_will_plan_* helpers are removed — the runner replaces them.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py runs the verb
against every (role × status × task_type) combo and asserts the
envelope matches spec.Decision.
* refactor(gateway): delegate uses spec.can_invoke_intent for role/state gate
Migrates delegate to the spec-driven role/state gate. The chain
validation (main_pm->cell_pm, cell_pm->its team's devs), the
assignee-vs-task_type rule (Cell PMs receive planning-typed only),
the enum coercion, and the parent-lifecycle/cap guards STAY in the
verb body — they encode delegate-specific semantics the spec
doesn't model.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py asserts the
spec's role+state rejection is correctly surfaced. Chain/assignee
rejections continue to be tested in test_choreographer_pm_extras.
* refactor(gateway): open_pr uses spec.can_invoke_intent + VerbRunner
Migrates open_pr to spec-driven gating. The spec's
extra_preconditions (PRECONDITION_OWNERSHIP, PRECONDITION_COMMITS,
PRECONDITION_NO_PR) handle all three precondition checks; the verb
body delegates side-effect dispatch (push_branch, create_pr) to
VerbRunner.
Idempotent re-entry retained: an open_pr call against a task that
already has a PR (and the caller owns it) returns OK without
re-opening, rather than the tracing_gap the spec would otherwise
produce. This preserves agent ergonomics — two calls in a row
shouldn't surface a misleading "no_prior_pr" hint.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py runs the verb
against representative (status x commits x pr_number) combos and
asserts the envelope matches spec.Decision.
* refactor(gateway): i_am_done uses spec.can_invoke_intent + VerbRunner
Migrates i_am_done to spec-driven gating. The spec's
extra_preconditions (PRECONDITION_OWNERSHIP, PRECONDITION_COMMITS)
handle ownership and commit-count checks; VerbRunner dispatches
the (submit_verification, submit_qa) atomic chain.
The tracing-gate preconditions (progress entry, journal:reflect,
acceptance criteria) and the field-level submit-qa gates stay in
the verb body — they model gates the spec doesn't yet cover.
Defense-in-depth: those gates run after the spec accepts the
ownership/commits checks.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py runs the
verb against (role × status × ownership × commits) and asserts
the envelope matches spec.Decision.
* refactor(gateway): i_am_blocked uses spec.can_invoke_intent + VerbRunner
Migrates i_am_blocked to spec-driven gating. The journal:struggle
write stays in the verb body (it's a side effect outside the
lifecycle action). VerbRunner dispatches the `block` atomic action
via task_service.escalate.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py.
* refactor(gateway): unclaim and resume use spec.can_invoke_intent
Migrates both verbs to the spec-driven gate. unclaim's verb body
keeps its dispatch (task.unclaim_for_agent) because composes=();
resume goes through VerbRunner with composes=("resume",).
The reassignment-rejection branch (introduced in
|