mirror of
https://github.com/rennf93/roboco.git
synced 2026-08-03 07:23:24 +02:00
d87e2d9b4e4c7e263b169f55c80aa87e51f7b545
9
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
93739a9dca |
fix(notifications): stop tick-wide row locks + poisoned-session swallows behind the PendingRollbackError 500s (#743)
* fix(notifications): release re-escalation row locks per row; stop swallowing DB errors in notify_get The re-escalation sweep ran one tick-wide transaction, so each CAS claim's row lock was held across every remaining delivery until the single commit — a concurrent mark-read UPDATE on a claimed row starved into the 60s lock_timeout. The sweep now commits per row (claim commit releases the lock before delivery and makes the burned slot durable), re-fetches each row by snapshotted id so one row's rollback can't expire the rest of the tick, and savepoints each recipient's delivery. notify_get's bare except swallowed the resulting LockNotAvailableError into a false "notification not found" and returned a poisoned session to the commit-at-send middleware, which blew up with PendingRollbackError; it now catches only the two domain outcomes. defer_after_commit's listeners fire on SAVEPOINT release too, which would have drained deferred telegram/bus work before real durability — they now skip savepoint boundaries via get_nested_transaction() (the root get_transaction() is non-None inside the listener even at a real commit). acknowledge_for_recipient's Redis dedup-clear moved before the flush so the row lock never spans a Redis round-trip. The five best-effort CEO-notify swallows that persist notification rows are savepointed. * fix(services): contain swallowed best-effort DB write failures instead of poisoning the session Sweep of the same class as the notify_get incident: broad except-Exception handlers that swallow a failure whose try-body writes through the shared session leave the session rollback-pending, and the verb/request then dies later with PendingRollbackError at commit-at-send. Confirmed-dangerous sites now run the write inside a savepoint (safe since defer_after_commit skips savepoint boundaries): ceo_approve's verified-stamp, completion/pitch/postmortem-style CEO notifies, _inherit_upstream_base, _link_commit_to_task (covers every commit route), board-program LEARN records, the QA/PR-gate/PM-merge verified-stamps, and the documenter->PM handoff. _ack_pending_wake_notifications gets the same treatment so a wake-ack failure can't fail the A2A read. telegram_inbound's per-update loop and intake confirm roll back explicitly instead (their success paths commit mid-flow, so a savepoint doesn't fit). A swallowed savepoint rollback fully expires any ORM object mutated inside the block, and the next attribute read raises MissingGreenlet — strictly worse than the original bug. The two paths that keep using the object after the swallow (doc handoff's envelope build, base inheritance's claim continuation) refresh it in the except path; regression tests run against a real session and were verified to fail with the refresh reverted. * test: shape mocked session.execute results so sync accessors stop leaking unawaited coroutines An AsyncMock's auto-created children are themselves AsyncMock, so production code that correctly awaits session.execute() and then calls sync accessors (.scalars().all(), .scalar_one_or_none()) on the result was silently collecting unawaited coroutines in 22 test files — 80 RuntimeWarnings per unit run, and in test_flow_soup_guard one mock raised a real TypeError that a coincidentally-matching invalid_state envelope masked. Each affected fixture now returns a plain MagicMock shaped like a real Result. Zero AsyncMock warnings remain. * docs: document per-row sweep commits and the savepoint/refresh containment pattern --------- Co-authored-by: Renn F <rennf93@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
60c64c70e8 |
fix(run-hardening): break PM decision-gate, stale-agent, and empty-diff loops (#255)
Forensic triage of a 24h run reconstructed the dominant gateway.rejected loops from the audit_log. After earlier deploys fixed the i_will_plan crash and the open_pr push-gap, three real, recurring-capable burn loops remained. This fixes them at the architecture level, not by prompt-nagging. journal:decision write-then-gate (the dominant completion-path blocker): PM decision-point verbs required a separate note(scope='decision') call before the verb, which loaded/weak models forget to chain — so complete and unblock hit a tracing_gap (journal:decision missing) and respawn-looped, stranding finished tasks forever. Each verb now auto-records its OWN rationale as the journal:decision before the gate runs (the proven i_am_blocked -> write_struggle pattern), so the gate passes off real, persisted reasoning. unblock gains a required `reason` (threaded MCP tool -> request schema -> routes -> choreographer); delegate derives the decision from its title + description; complete/submit_up/submit_root/escalate_up/ escalate_to_ceo reuse their existing notes/reason. The gate still runs as defense-in-depth; the auto-record is idempotent within the decision window and best-effort. Adds JournalService.write_decision and Choreographer._ensure_pm_decision. open_pr empty-diff 422: an overlapping-decomposition leaf with zero commits vs its base makes GitHub 422 "No commits between ...". The generic invalid_state "retry" looped the dev 15x on one task. open_pr now steers to a terminal i_am_blocked hand-off so the PM completes or cancels the redundant leaf. owns_task stale-agent loop (41x): a superseded agent (task reassigned away) calling i_am_done/open_pr got a PRECONDITION_OWNERSHIP tracing_gap it read as a fixable precondition and retried forever. Both verbs now short-circuit with the clear not_authorized "no longer yours -> give_me_work" steer that resume/unclaim already use. RAG docs updated for the new unblock(reason) signature; CHANGELOG entries added under 0.11.0 (unreleased). open_pr refactored into _open_pr_preflight_rejection + _open_pr_failure_env to stay within the return-count and complexity budgets. Co-authored-by: Renn F <rennf93@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Renn F
|
8cf697816f |
feat(content): obligate role note sections like journals
Completes the note(scope='handoff') write-path (WIP
|
||
|
|
ff35a646fa |
Chore: reduce analytics complexity (#100)
* refactor(analytics): reduce cyclomatic complexity in usage/pricing/rollup
Collapse the three near-identical get_by_* aggregation methods in
UsageService into a shared _aggregate_by helper parameterized by group
column and key name, and centralize token null-coalescing in a
_row_tokens helper. Extract the per-row upsert in _sweep_daily_rollup
into _upsert_rollup_row, and the pricing-table lookup into
_lookup_prices. All blocks now rank <= B and both modules rank A, so the
xenon gate passes; behavior is unchanged and existing tests stay green.
* feat(billing): make token pricing provider-aware
Distinguish three cases when a model has no per-token rate: a non-Anthropic
model (local Ollama, or an Ollama Cloud ":cloud" model billed by flat
subscription / GPU-time) legitimately has no per-token cost and returns 0.0
silently; an unpriced Anthropic ("claude"-named) model also returns 0.0 but
logs a warning, since that is real spend being undercounted and catches new or
renamed Claude models missing from the table. Folds the old ollama/ prefix
special-case into the general non-Anthropic path so there is one code path,
and replaces the blanket 'no pricing data' warning that fired even for
self-hosted models.
* fix(tasks): preserve ownership when force-unclaiming to pending
The stale-claim reaper and the dependency-blocked release both routed through
_force_unclaim_to_pending, which nulled assigned_to and left the task in a
pending state owned by nobody — no dispatcher re-spawns an ownerless pending
task, so it went dormant. The dispatcher-side claimed_by fallback only masked
half the cases.
Capture the owner before releasing the claim and keep both assigned_to and
claimed_by pointed at it (mirroring the unblock restore), releasing only the
live claim (active_claimant_id + heartbeat) and the WorkSession. The same agent
now resumes the task once it re-dispatches. Updates the reaper test that
asserted the old orphaning behavior and adds owner-preservation coverage for
both the reaper and dependency-release paths.
* fix(tasks): unblock restores the owner into both ownership fields
Audit follow-up to the force-unclaim ownership fix. unblock() only restored
assigned_to from blocker_raised_by, which block() stashes solely from
assigned_to. A task claimed via give_me_work (claimed_by set, assigned_to null)
therefore unblocked into a split-owner state — assigned_to null but claimed_by
set — that both the dev dispatcher and the PM pool-router race to pick up. It
also left claimed_by pointing at the resolver PM after an escalation.
Resolve the owner as blocker_raised_by or assigned_to or claimed_by and write
it to both fields, matching the force-unclaim and reassign convention so the
original worker resumes cleanly. Adds coverage for the give_me_work-claim case
and asserts owner restoration on the existing in_progress-resume test.
* test(orchestrator): cover dev owner resolution and the claimed_by fallback
_resolve_dev_owner_uuid had no coverage. Add the status-dependent precedence
(claimed/blocked prefer the live claimant; other statuses prefer the
PM-assigned owner) and the half-reap fallback where a pending task with
assigned_to nulled still resolves its owner from claimed_by instead of going
dormant.
* fix(tasks): wire the pre-block snapshot so unblock(restore=True) works
The restore=True path on a PM unblock was a no-op: pre_block_state /
pre_block_assignee (migration 006) were read by unblock_with_restore but never
written, so it always fell through to legacy unblock() and the restore flag did
nothing.
Snapshot the resting status + owner at every block entry (dependency block,
soft block, escalation) before mutating, capturing only the first block in a
chain so a re-block doesn't overwrite the original state. Escalation snapshots
the outgoing owner, not the escalation target, so restore returns the original
worker. The restore path applies the same branchless guard legacy unblock()
relies on — a snapshotted in_progress with no branch diverts to pending instead
of looping the dispatcher — and is extracted into _apply_pre_block_restore to
keep complexity under the gate. Adds coverage for snapshot capture, restore,
the branchless divert, and escalation owner restoration.
* test(tasks): update orphan-reconciler and dependency-release tests for owner preservation
Both the startup orphan reconciler and the dependency-blocked claim release
route through unclaim_for_reaper / _force_unclaim_to_pending, which now preserve
the owner instead of nulling assigned_to. Update the two tests that asserted the
old orphaning behavior to assert the owner is kept (so the same agent resumes)
while the live claim is released.
* chore(tests): scrub internal work-item labels from test names, docstrings, comments
Rename four test files that carried audit work-item IDs in their filenames
(test_p0_7_branch_atomicity, test_p2_8_orphan_reconciler,
test_p2_9_autogen_prompt_layer, test_p2_7_attempt_id) to describe what they
test, and strip the matching P-/D-/S- cluster labels from docstrings, comments,
and assertion messages across the test suite and two orchestrator comments.
These are internal references with no meaning in the codebase; behavior is
unchanged.
* style: reformat assertion line shortened by the internal-ref scrub
* build: waive unreachable torch CVE-2025-3000 in pip-audit gate
torch is a transitive CPU-pinned dep (piragi / sentence-transformers) never
loaded at runtime — the stack uses Ollama over HTTP for all embeddings/LLM, so
the vulnerable torch.jit.script path is unreachable. CVE-2025-3000 is MEDIUM,
local-only, with no published fix. Documented --ignore-vuln waiver; revisit when
a fixed torch ships.
* fix(orchestrator): route unplaceable pending tasks to main-pm instead of dropping them
_get_routing_target returned None when a 'dev'-classified task had no cell
agent (no team, or a non-cell team like fullstack/system) or when the routing
classification was unrecognized. _route_unassigned_pm_task logged 'no routing
target found' and returned, leaving the task ownerless and pending — and no
dispatcher re-spawns an unrouted pending task, so it went dormant for 10+ min
until the stuck-task detector caught it.
Fall back to main-pm (the same default cell_pm routing and escalation already
use) so the task is always owned and triaged, never stranded. Logs the fallback
so unplaceable tasks stay visible. Adds a test asserting no (routing, team)
combination ever resolves to None.
* fix(panel): make intake chat markdown inherit the bubble's text color
MarkdownBody is shared by the assistant (text-foreground) and user
(text-primary-foreground) bubbles. [&_*]:!text-inherit only colored the prose
div's descendants, so the prose div itself kept the prose typography body color
(gray) and children inherited that — unreadable on the muted assistant bubble.
Add !text-inherit on the prose div itself so it inherits the bubble's color
too; descendants then inherit the correct foreground. Fixes both bubbles without
hardcoding a color.
* fix(prompter): keep a board-reviewed product on the board team so Approve & Start shows
A product coordination root confirmed via 'Board review & Start' is assigned to
a board reviewer (product-owner) for review, but create_task_from_draft set
team=main_pm for every product unconditionally. The CEO's Approve & Start gate
keys on team=board, so the button never appeared — and because the owner stayed
a board agent while the team said main_pm, the dispatcher routed it to the board
path (nothing left to do after review) and the task stranded at pending, with
the board agent fruitlessly trying to escalate it up.
Route a product by its assignee: a board reviewer keeps it team=board (so the
gate appears and approve_and_start later hands it to Main PM), while a main-pm
assignee — the 'Approve & Start' straight-through path — is team=main_pm. Adds
_assignee_is_board mirroring TaskService's board-role check, and a test.
---------
Co-authored-by: Renn F <rennf93@users.noreply.github.com>
|
||
|
Renn F
|
41ef7f6b4e |
feat(gateway): C8 PM-decision gate windowed satisfaction
_check_pm_decision_required now requires the latest journal:decision within pm_decision_window_seconds (default 300). Older decisions no longer satisfy the gate. Adds JournalService.latest_decision_at. Future-tighten (out of scope): per-verb-group consumption tracking would need persistent state — Choreographer is per-request today. |
||
|
|
207aaecd72 |
Feature: lifecycle canonical spec (#14)
* chore: clean make quality baseline on feature/lifecycle-canonical-spec
Three classes of pre-existing issues blocking `make quality`:
1. Alembic migrations 002/009/011 used runtime introspection
(op.get_bind() + inspect / bind.execute) without guarding for
offline (--sql) mode. `alembic upgrade head --sql` is part of
`make quality`; in offline mode `op.get_bind()` returns a
MockConnection with no inspection system, so the migrations
crashed before emitting their SQL stubs. Each migration now
short-circuits or simplifies in `context.is_offline_mode()` —
live-DB behavior is unchanged.
2. ruff format drift on three files left over from prior in-flight
edits (choreographer/_impl.py, content_actions.py, and one test
file). `ruff format` applied.
3. vulture flagged two unused `tb` parameters in async __aexit__
stubs in test_task_service_lifecycle_misc.py. The parameter is
protocol-required but unused by the body — renamed to `_tb`
(vulture treats underscore-prefixed names as intentionally unused).
`make quality` is now green from this branch's HEAD; subsequent
lifecycle-spec work can use it as the per-task gate.
* feat(lifecycle): canonical spec package + Role/Status/TaskType enums
Foundation for the canonical lifecycle/permissions module. Enums
mirror docs/internal/old/workflows/STATUS_TRANSITIONS.md +
PERMISSIONS.md. Tests pin enum membership against both the
predecessor canon and roboco.models.base.TaskType.
* feat(lifecycle): Decision dataclass with allow/reject/tracing_gap constructors
Single rejection shape every consumer maps to its native format
(Envelope, HTTP code, prompt hint). __post_init__ enforces the
allowed/rejection_kind invariants so a malformed Decision can't reach
a consumer.
* fix(lifecycle): tighten Decision invariants per Task 2 review
Two reviewer findings on the Task 2 Decision dataclass, addressed
in one commit:
1. The docstring promised `allowed=True ⇒ rejection_kind is None
AND missing == [] AND remediate is None`, but __post_init__ only
checked the rejection_kind half. A caller could construct an
allow-shaped Decision with stale missing/remediate fields and
sneak it past validation. Tighten __post_init__ to enforce the
full invariant. Add a regression test.
2. tracing_gap defensively copies the missing list (`list(missing)`)
to isolate the stored list from later caller-side mutation, but
no test pinned this. Add a regression test that mutates the source
list after construction and asserts the stored list is unchanged.
Issue 2 from the same review (mutable list vs tuple for `missing`)
is a broader design call deferred until consumers exist; the
defensive copy is sufficient until then.
* feat(lifecycle): Precondition/ActionSpec/IntentSpec/StatusTransition dataclasses
The four dataclasses that hold the canonical tables. ActionSpec and
StatusTransition are direct ports of pre-gateway PERMISSIONS.md +
STATUS_TRANSITIONS.md rows. IntentSpec is the gateway-only addition:
each gateway intent verb declares which atomic actions it composes.
* feat(lifecycle): _STATUS_TRANSITIONS table + STATUS_GRAPH view
Direct port of STATUS_TRANSITIONS.md. Every transition records its
trigger action and (optionally) a role constraint. STATUS_GRAPH is
the precomputed source→{targets} view callers use for reachability
checks.
* fix(lifecycle): pin role_constraint values + clarify Task-5 handoff
Two reviewer findings on Task 4 _STATUS_TRANSITIONS, addressed in
one commit:
1. The original Task-4 tests verified (source, target) pairs but
not role_constraint contents. A typo in a single role name (e.g.
forgetting MAIN_PM from escalate_to_ceo) would have slipped past
them silently. Add test_status_transitions_role_constraints_match_canon
pinning every non-None constraint and the cancel-block invariant.
2. role_constraint=None on the `claim` rows from PENDING and
NEEDS_REVISION was load-bearing — it is the explicit handoff
point between the StatusTransition table (state machine layer)
and CLAIM_RULES (per-role claim authority, lands in Task 5).
The original inline comment said this in passing; expand it so
the design choice is unmissable for a stranger reading just
spec.py.
* feat(lifecycle): _ATOMIC_ACTIONS + CLAIM_RULES + ROLE_TEAM_RULES tables
Direct port of PERMISSIONS.md. Every task management tool gets an
ActionSpec with allowed_roles, source_statuses, target_status,
self_review_block, and needs_team_match flags. CLAIM_RULES maps each
Role to the statuses they can claim from. ROLE_TEAM_RULES is the
per-slug team restriction.
* fix(lifecycle): tighten ActionSpec contracts per Task 5 review
Three reviewer findings on Task 5's _ATOMIC_ACTIONS table, addressed
in one commit:
1. set_plan.source_statuses widened to {CLAIMED, IN_PROGRESS} but
every existing caller (i_will_work_on / i_will_plan compositions)
runs set_plan while CLAIMED, between claim and start. Narrow to
{CLAIMED} only. If a future "edit plan mid-flight" feature lands,
widen explicitly with test coverage at that time.
2. needs_team_match was set True only on claim/qa_pass/qa_fail/
docs_complete. Defense-in-depth says every role-scoped task
action should re-assert team match (don't rely on the inheritance
chain through assigned_to alone). Flip to True on: start,
set_plan, block, pause, submit_verification, submit_qa,
submit_pm_review, complete, create_subtask. Leave False on
board/CEO actions and PM cross-cell interventions (unblock,
resume, cancel) where the cross-cell semantics are intentional.
3. claim.source_statuses is intentionally a SUPERSET of any single
role's CLAIM_RULES allowance (the table holds the union; CLAIM_RULES
holds the per-role authority). Add an inline comment above the
claim ActionSpec so a future reader doesn't conclude the two
tables disagree — they don't, they encode overlapping facts at
different grains.
* feat(lifecycle): _INTENT_VERBS table — every gateway verb declared
Each gateway intent verb is now a named composition of atomic actions
plus optional side effects. i_will_work_on = (claim, set_plan, start);
i_am_done = (submit_verification, submit_qa); open_pr is pure side
effects (push_branch, create_pr); etc.
* fix(lifecycle): widen block.allowed_roles to include QA + Documenter
Task 6 review caught a role-set inconsistency: i_am_blocked.allowed_roles
admits dev/QA/doc, but the underlying block.allowed_roles only allowed
dev+PM. Result: a QA or documenter calling i_am_blocked would pass the
IntentSpec gate and then be rejected by the composed ActionSpec gate
when Task 7 wires can_invoke_intent.
Widen block to include QA + Documenter. The semantic case is sound: a
QA reviewing a task can discover an external blocker; a documenter
writing docs may need PM intervention. Predecessor PERMISSIONS.md
restricted block to dev+PM, but with the gateway exposing i_am_blocked
to all worker roles, the underlying atomic must agree.
The deeper unclaim/escalate_up "imperative verb" concern from the same
review (composes=() but mutates state) is deferred to Task 8 where the
validator design lands.
* feat(lifecycle): public lookup functions + Context + preconditions
can_claim, can_invoke_action, can_invoke_intent, valid_next_verbs,
composed_actions_for, intents_for_role, status_after — the entire
public surface every consumer will use. Context carries the
caller-supplied state preconditions need (plan, journal-decision
flag, etc.). Preconditions for plan/commits/no_pr/ownership are
declared once and wired into the relevant IntentSpecs.
* fix(lifecycle): wire PRECONDITION_OWNERSHIP through Context.actor_id
Task 7 review found _p_owns_task reads agent.id but every call site
passes None for the agent arg. Result: getattr(None, "id", object())
returns a fresh sentinel, task.assigned_to == <sentinel> is always
False, and open_pr / i_am_done would reject every owner the moment
Task 9 wires consumers.
Fix: thread identity through Context.actor_id (new UUID field) and
rewrite _p_owns_task to read from the context. Both call sites already
pass the Context — no signature changes elsewhere. Add green-path
test exercising the owner-can-open-pr case the existing tests
missed (the Task 7 plan only tested precondition-failure paths,
which masked the bug).
Plus surface hygiene: STATUS_GRAPH, CLAIM_RULES, ROLE_TEAM_RULES,
and the four PRECONDITION_* constants are now in
roboco.lifecycle.__init__.__all__ so consumers in Tasks 8/9 don't
depend on the implicit `from roboco.lifecycle.spec import ...`
backdoor.
* feat(lifecycle): import-time self-consistency validators
10 validators run at module import; first failure raises
LifecycleSpecError and prevents the package from loading. Covers
status enum coverage, reachability, terminal exits, intent
compositions, status chain consistency, claim-rule role/status
coverage, self-review symmetry, team-rule slug existence, and
StatusTransition action references.
* fix(lifecycle): close validator gaps; resolve BACKLOG-claim and submit_qa IN_PROGRESS-shortcut ambiguity
Three reviewer follow-ups on Task 8's _validate.py, plus two real
data corrections the new action-target-reachability validator
surfaced.
1. Design spec §9 calls for "every ActionSpec.target_status, when
set, is reachable from each source_status via STATUS_GRAPH" —
missing from Task 8's 10 validators. Add
_check_action_target_reachable_from_source.
2. _check_role_team_rules_slugs verified slug existence in
AGENT_UUIDS but NOT that the cell team in ROLE_TEAM_RULES
matches the seed. Add _check_role_team_rules_team_match,
scoped to non-None entries only — None means "exempt from
team-match enforcement" (cross-cell roles), not "no team in
org chart".
3. test_validators_pass_on_real_spec was ceremonial. Add
test_run_all_validators_raises_on_unknown_intent_action,
a deliberate-break regression that monkeypatches _INTENT_VERBS
to inject a fake action and asserts LifecycleSpecError raises.
The new action-target-reachability validator caught two real
data inconsistencies between the predecessor canon docs and the
spec tables:
A. claim.source_statuses listed BACKLOG and CLAIM_RULES[*PM]
listed BACKLOG, but STATUS_GRAPH[BACKLOG] = {PENDING, CANCELLED}
only. Resolution: PMs use the explicit \`activate\` action to
move BACKLOG → PENDING, then claim from PENDING. Drop BACKLOG
from claim.source_statuses and CLAIM_RULES.
B. submit_qa.source_statuses listed IN_PROGRESS, but
STATUS_GRAPH[IN_PROGRESS] does NOT include AWAITING_QA. The
intent verb i_am_done composes (submit_verification, submit_qa)
which forces IN_PROGRESS → VERIFYING → AWAITING_QA — no
shortcut. Drop the stale IN_PROGRESS entry from
submit_qa.source_statuses.
Both corrections tighten the canonical state machine to a strict
no-skip transition graph. Pre-gateway PERMISSIONS.md/STATUS_TRANSITIONS.md
disagreements are resolved here; spec.py is the canon now.
* feat(gateway): Envelope.from_decision maps lifecycle Decisions to envelopes
Single shape adapter so verb bodies stop hand-composing rejection
envelopes. Each rejection_kind maps to a specific envelope flavor;
'self_review' folds into 'not_authorized' with a parenthetical hint;
constructing from an allow Decision raises (programmer error).
* feat(gateway): VerbRunner for atomic composed-action dispatch
Wraps spec.composed_actions_for(intent) in session.begin_nested()
so mid-sequence failures roll the DB back. Side effects run AFTER
the savepoint commits. Each atomic action name dispatches to a
TaskService method via a single, exhaustive _dispatch_atomic
mapping. New verbs slot in by adding an IntentSpec entry + a
_dispatch_atomic case if a new atomic is needed.
* refactor(gateway): i_will_work_on uses spec.can_invoke_intent + VerbRunner
Replace the bespoke status-branch dispatcher in i_will_work_on with the
spec-driven flow: load task -> load agent -> build spec.Context ->
spec.can_invoke_intent (and spec.can_claim for per-role status authority)
-> Envelope.from_decision on rejection -> VerbRunner.run_intent on success.
The _i_will_work_on_pending, _i_will_work_on_claimed,
_i_will_work_on_needs_revision, and _start_failed_envelope helpers are
removed; the runner replaces them. Two narrow verb-body re-entry blocks
remain for behaviors the spec does not yet model:
1. in_progress + same agent -> idempotent heartbeat-only return
2. claimed + same agent -> _resume_from_claimed (set_plan + start)
to recover from a stuck mid-claim crash without re-running claim
against a state the spec excludes.
The behavioral claim guards (already_active / paused / sibling_sequence)
also stay imperative for now -- they're not in the spec yet and migrate
into spec.extra_preconditions in a later task. Per-role claim authority
is enforced via spec.can_claim because the atomic claim action's
source_statuses are the union across roles; CLAIM_RULES narrows.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py runs the verb
against every (role x status x task_type='code') combo (112 rows) and
asserts the envelope error matches the spec's Decision (or can_claim's
Decision when the intent gate passes but per-role claim authority does
not). This is the contract that makes spec/verb drift impossible.
Existing tests updated where rejection-message text changed (the spec
now produces the messages, e.g. "role 'cell_pm' may not call
'i_will_work_on'" instead of "PM cannot execute code") or where the
spec's stricter view ("invalid_state" -> "not_authorized" for a dev
trying to claim awaiting_qa) is more accurate. Test fixtures were
updated to wire task.session.begin_nested as a proper async context
manager (required by VerbRunner) and to set agent_for().id so runner-
driven calls line up with assert_awaited_with(task_id, agent_id).
* refactor(lifecycle): push CLAIM_RULES enforcement into can_invoke_action
Task 11's i_will_work_on migration had to call spec.can_claim()
separately after spec.can_invoke_intent() because the claim action's
source_statuses is the union across all claim-eligible roles —
can_invoke_intent alone would let a developer pass for claiming
awaiting_qa (a QA-only state).
The retrofit pattern would repeat in every claim-composing verb
(i_will_plan, claim_review, claim_doc_task). Push the per-role
narrowing inside can_invoke_action when the action is "claim",
using the same not_authorized vs invalid_state disambiguation
can_claim already implemented (status-reserved-for-another-role
returns not_authorized; status-no-role-can-claim returns
invalid_state). Extracted the body to _check_claim_rules_narrow
to keep can_invoke_action under xenon's complexity threshold.
Update _i_will_work_on_gate to drop the redundant spec.can_claim
call. Update test_consumer_parity.py to assert only against
can_invoke_intent's Decision.
Tasks 12-22 will inherit the cleaner pattern: spec.can_invoke_intent
is the single gate; verb bodies don't need per-action retrofits.
* refactor(gateway): i_will_plan uses spec.can_invoke_intent + VerbRunner
Migrates i_will_plan to the spec-driven pattern Task 11 set up for
i_will_work_on. The verb body now: (1) loads task + agent, (2) builds
Context, (3) checks idempotent/recovery re-entry, (4) calls
spec.can_invoke_intent, (5) returns Envelope.from_decision on
rejection, (6) delegates composition to VerbRunner. The
_i_will_plan_* helpers are removed — the runner replaces them.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py runs the verb
against every (role × status × task_type) combo and asserts the
envelope matches spec.Decision.
* refactor(gateway): delegate uses spec.can_invoke_intent for role/state gate
Migrates delegate to the spec-driven role/state gate. The chain
validation (main_pm->cell_pm, cell_pm->its team's devs), the
assignee-vs-task_type rule (Cell PMs receive planning-typed only),
the enum coercion, and the parent-lifecycle/cap guards STAY in the
verb body — they encode delegate-specific semantics the spec
doesn't model.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py asserts the
spec's role+state rejection is correctly surfaced. Chain/assignee
rejections continue to be tested in test_choreographer_pm_extras.
* refactor(gateway): open_pr uses spec.can_invoke_intent + VerbRunner
Migrates open_pr to spec-driven gating. The spec's
extra_preconditions (PRECONDITION_OWNERSHIP, PRECONDITION_COMMITS,
PRECONDITION_NO_PR) handle all three precondition checks; the verb
body delegates side-effect dispatch (push_branch, create_pr) to
VerbRunner.
Idempotent re-entry retained: an open_pr call against a task that
already has a PR (and the caller owns it) returns OK without
re-opening, rather than the tracing_gap the spec would otherwise
produce. This preserves agent ergonomics — two calls in a row
shouldn't surface a misleading "no_prior_pr" hint.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py runs the verb
against representative (status x commits x pr_number) combos and
asserts the envelope matches spec.Decision.
* refactor(gateway): i_am_done uses spec.can_invoke_intent + VerbRunner
Migrates i_am_done to spec-driven gating. The spec's
extra_preconditions (PRECONDITION_OWNERSHIP, PRECONDITION_COMMITS)
handle ownership and commit-count checks; VerbRunner dispatches
the (submit_verification, submit_qa) atomic chain.
The tracing-gate preconditions (progress entry, journal:reflect,
acceptance criteria) and the field-level submit-qa gates stay in
the verb body — they model gates the spec doesn't yet cover.
Defense-in-depth: those gates run after the spec accepts the
ownership/commits checks.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py runs the
verb against (role × status × ownership × commits) and asserts
the envelope matches spec.Decision.
* refactor(gateway): i_am_blocked uses spec.can_invoke_intent + VerbRunner
Migrates i_am_blocked to spec-driven gating. The journal:struggle
write stays in the verb body (it's a side effect outside the
lifecycle action). VerbRunner dispatches the `block` atomic action
via task_service.escalate.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py.
* refactor(gateway): unclaim and resume use spec.can_invoke_intent
Migrates both verbs to the spec-driven gate. unclaim's verb body
keeps its dispatch (task.unclaim_for_agent) because composes=();
resume goes through VerbRunner with composes=("resume",).
The reassignment-rejection branch (introduced in
|
||
|
Renn F
|
4829f93a68 |
fix(gateway): unblock task claim; full Phase 0/1/2 remediation
Resolves the 100% claim-failure rate introduced by the gateway rewrite
(commit
|
||
|
Renn F
|
9bae446cbe | Linting/Formatting | ||
|
Renn FandClaude Opus 4.7
|
4cb47afdb2 |
feat(gateway): restore Gate Set E submit-qa field-level gates
i_am_done now strictly enforces the four pre-gateway field-level gates
restored from roboco/api/routes/tasks.py:903-940 at commit
|