mirror of
https://github.com/rennf93/roboco.git
synced 2026-08-03 07:23:24 +02:00
9028d3b641dca44d20cb55f471173b14378ef572
12
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
c09cf80b40 |
Feature/observability gateway health (#247)
* feat(observability): revision_count + audit_log query index (migration 045)
Adds tasks.revision_count (the O(1) rework counter — forward-only, existing
rows default 0) and the composite index audit_log(target_id, event_type,
timestamp) that powers the cycle-time and rework reconstruction queries.
Verified the real upgrade/downgrade/upgrade chain on a throwaway pgvector PG.
First task of the 0.10.0 observability dashboards.
* feat(observability): count reworks + attribute qa_fail/pr_fail to the rejector
Every transition into needs_revision increments tasks.revision_count at the
single audit chokepoint (exactly once per bounce, across all paths incl. pr_fail
and ceo_reject), so the rework rate is an O(1) read. A QA or PR-review bounce
also emits a named task.qa_fail / task.pr_fail audit event carrying the
rejector's agent_id, so the per-agent rework scorecard charges the rejection to
the reviewer who made it, not the developer who owns the task.
* feat(observability): cycle-time, bottleneck, rework, and scorecard metrics
MetricsService gains four read methods on the audit_log + tasks data: per-stage
cycle time reconstructed from the transition journey (excluding the named
qa_fail/pr_fail events), bottleneck distribution (cumulative dwell + live parked
counts), rework rate (overall/by-team/by-agent with rejector attribution + cost
via spawn-session task_id), and a fused per-agent/per-cell scorecard. Dataclass
models with to_dict(). Verified against a real Postgres journey.
* feat(observability): cycle-time/bottleneck/rework/scorecard read endpoints
Thin read-only routes on the dashboard router delegating to MetricsService:
/metrics/cycle-time, /metrics/bottlenecks, /metrics/rework, and
/metrics/scorecard/{agent,team}. 404 when an agent scorecard target is absent.
5 route tests (200 + shape + the agent-404 case).
* feat(panel): Delivery observability tab (cycle-time, bottlenecks, rework, scorecards)
A third Metrics tab built on the observability endpoints: a per-stage
cycle-time bar chart, a bottleneck panel (worst stage + cumulative dwell +
live parked counts), a rework panel (rate + by-team + by-agent attribution +
cost), and per-cell scorecards. Reuses Recharts + Card/Badge/Skeleton and the
React-Query hook pattern; observabilityApi mirrors usageApi with mock-mode
fallbacks. tsc + eslint clean; 113 panel tests pass.
* docs(observability): changelog + CLAUDE.md for the delivery dashboards
* feat(gateway-health): recover a broken-but-alive agent instead of protecting it
The verb-heartbeat cannot tell a quiet-healthy agent from one whose MCP gateway
is broken (a corrupted /app/.venv firing no verb) yet whose container is up — the
reaper's live-skip would shield it forever. The reaper now probes the gateway
out-of-band (docker exec: does the gateway venv import its deps?) and, once it
has been broken past gateway_health_grace_seconds (tolerating a transient probe
miss), kills + evicts the container so it falls through to release + respawn.
Probe-inconclusive or healthy spares the container. Gated by
gateway_health_enabled (default-on reliability fix; in the panel Feature Flags).
Defers the optional agent-side self-check + full registry re-adoption — the
reaper's docker-liveness fallback already recovers a broken-after-restart agent.
* docs(gateway-health): changelog + CLAUDE.md for broken-but-alive recovery
* docs(observability): user-facing docs for the Delivery dashboards + gateway-health
Documents the new Metrics -> Delivery tab (cycle-time, bottlenecks, rework with
rejector attribution, cell scorecards) in the panel guide and the operations
health-and-metrics guide, and adds the gateway-health env vars + an agent-gateway
recovery note. Published MkDocs site only; settings.md's default-off flag table
intentionally omits the default-on gateway-health flag (same as overload-break).
* chore(release): cut 0.10.0 (changelog section + version refs)
* fix(gateway): exempt PM coordinators from single-task claim guards
A Main/Cell PM plans and delegates many root tasks in parallel; the work
then runs in the delegated cells, not in the PM's own hands. But the
claim-time concurrency guards meant for developers — already_active and
paused (the latter firing after i_am_idle auto-pauses the PM's own
umbrella) — were applied to the PM too, so once it held one root it could
never plan a second: it thrashed between its claimed roots and respawned
forever, burning tokens for zero progress.
_run_claim_guards now skips already_active/paused for the coordinator PM
roles (_COORDINATOR_ROLES = {main_pm, cell_pm}); only unmet_dependency — a
real upstream sequence constraint, which parks the root back to pending —
still gates a PM. paused_tasks_guard also excludes the target task itself,
so a PM re-entering its own paused umbrella never self-blocks.
Tests: a coordinator plans a second root with one in_progress + one paused
sibling (full path + claimed-recovery path), the paused target exclusion,
and the developer guards still fire. Repurposed the pre-fix test that
asserted the now-removed PM block.
* fix(metrics): coerce SQL avg/extract hours aggregates to float (panel toFixed crash)
EXTRACT(epoch ...) returns numeric on PostgreSQL 14+, which asyncpg surfaces
as a Decimal; a Decimal serializes to a quoted JSON string, so the panel's
avg_cycle_hours.toFixed(1) (and the other hours fields) threw 'toFixed is not
a function' and blanked the Delivery tab.
A single _as_hours helper now rounds every SQL-averaged hours field to a real
float — avg_cycle_hours on the new scorecards plus the pre-existing
avg_completion_hours / avg_blocked_hours / longest_blocked_hours. Token and
cost fields were already float()-cast and are unaffected.
Regression test asserts _as_hours coerces Decimal -> float and preserves the
None/zero behavior.
* feat(panel): edit a task's sequence from the details page
A task's sequence (order within siblings, lower runs first) was display-only
with no way to change it from the UI, and TaskUpdate didn't carry the field
so PATCH couldn't set it either. The details page's Dependencies tab now has
an inline sequence editor mirroring the parent / dependency editors, and
PATCH /tasks/{id} accepts a sequence field (owner or privileged role) through
the existing generic update path.
* fix(mypy): green the full make-quality type gate
make quality runs 'mypy roboco/ tests/', which the per-module checks on the
0.10.0 branch never exercised. Two issues surfaced:
- The coordinator-exemption change added role_str to
Choreographer._run_claim_guards but not to the ChoreographerHelpers
protocol base, so the composed Choreographer had incompatible base-class
signatures. Sync the protocol signature.
- The gateway-health / stale-reaper tests stubbed methods by direct
assignment (orch._m = AsyncMock()) and typed their duck-typed task doubles
as object, tripping method-assign / assignment / attr-defined. Switch to
monkeypatch.setattr (keeping a local mock ref for the assertions) and type
the doubles as Any — no type: ignore.
Full mypy roboco/ tests/ clean (785 files); the 21 runtime tests pass.
* fix(metrics): static cycle-time SQL — clear bandit B608 (CI gate)
The cycle-time query interpolated an optional team clause into the text() SQL
via an f-string, which bandit flags as B608 (hardcoded SQL) and turned the
merge gate red. The team value was always a bound parameter, so it was a false
positive — but the f-string is the trigger. Rebuilt as one static query with
(CAST(:team AS text) IS NULL OR a.details->>'team' = :team) and an always-bound
team param (CAST, not ::text — SQLAlchemy's :param parser collides with
PostgreSQL's :: cast operator, which broke the query as a stray param).
Full make quality green vs a real pgvector PG (all 21 gate steps).
---------
Co-authored-by: Renn F <rennf93@users.noreply.github.com>
|
||
|
|
06682f33c6 |
Fix: agent workflow hardening (#70)
* fix(gateway): push the branch before QA handoff so reviewers see the latest commits The commit content tool commits locally without pushing; only open_pr pushed the branch. On the first submission that was fine, but a fix committed while addressing needs_revision never reached origin (open_pr is skipped once the PR exists), so QA — which reviews the remote PR branch — re-reviewed the stale remote and re-failed the task on every cycle, a loop that never converged. i_am_done now pushes the task branch (idempotent; a no-op when nothing is unpushed) as part of the shared submit gate, covering both the normal and resume-from-verifying paths. A push failure blocks the handoff with a clear remediation rather than parking the task in awaiting_qa with commits that exist only in the developer's local workspace. * fix(orchestrator): don't reap a stale claim while the agent's container is alive The stale-claim reaper released any claimed/in_progress task whose last_heartbeat_at exceeded the TTL. The heartbeat only updates on certain gateway calls, so a developer deep in a long edit/test cycle outran the TTL and had its claim reaped mid-work — churning the task and risking a double spawn against the still-running container. The reaper now skips a task whose assignee still holds a live (ACTIVE) agent instance, trusting container liveness — the ground truth — over the heartbeat proxy. The check is defensive on missing fields so a heartbeat-only caller (and the reaper's existing unit tests) behave exactly as before. * fix(gateway): refuse to unblock a task while a dependency is unfinished A PM unblock on a dependency-gated task moved it straight to in_progress, overriding the dependency — letting a dependent proceed without its upstream's work (e.g. a frontend task built before its UX design lands). A dependency block is meant to clear on its own via _unblock_dependents the moment the upstream reaches a terminal state. unblock now refuses while any dependency is still non-terminal, returning a clear remediation that the block resolves automatically. Manual unblock remains available for genuine, non-dependency blockers. * fix(gateway): release a dependency-blocked claim to pending instead of looping A task that reached claimed/in_progress with an unfinished dependency was left in that state when the claim guard rejected, so the orchestrator's respawn loop kept reviving its assignee — which could make no progress — burning work for nothing. The claim guard now releases such a task back to pending. claimed -> blocked is not a legal transition, so pending — held by the dispatch dependency filter — is the lifecycle-correct resting state: the respawn loop ignores pending tasks, and _unblock_dependents re-dispatches it once the upstream reaches a terminal state. release_dependency_blocked_claim shares a _force_unclaim_to_pending core with unclaim_for_reaper so both record a truthful work-session abandon reason. * feat(security): warn at startup in header-trust mode + document the auth posture When ROBOCO_AGENT_AUTH_REQUIRED is not enabled the API accepts the X-Agent-Id / X-Agent-Role headers without a signed token, so any client that can reach it may act as any role (including 'ceo'). The API now logs a clear warning at startup in this mode, and the README gains a Security section documenting the auth posture and how to harden it. Acceptable only on a trusted private network — do not expose the API to untrusted networks. * fix(workspace): scope the refresh fetch to current + default branch ensure_workspace's healthy short-circuit ran an all-refs 'git fetch origin' to keep every origin/<branch> ref current. On a monorepo with many accumulated feature/* branches that exceeds the refresh timeout, the fetch silently fails, and the workspace keeps a stale base — so an agent builds on an out-of-date branch. The refresh now fetches only the workspace's current branch and the repo's default branch (resolved via origin/HEAD), with --no-tags --prune: it transfers near-nothing and can't time out. Readers need their own branch and the default; the integration branch is refreshed at branch-creation time. * fix(git): refresh a dependency-blocked task's branch off the current integration tip A cross-cell dependent (e.g. a frontend task waiting on the UX design) was branched off a base captured before its upstream merged into the integration branch, and the branch was never re-synced — so the agent built on a stale snapshot with none of the upstream's work. Two changes close the gap: - release_dependency_blocked_claim now clears branch_name, so the re-claim (after the dependency clears) re-runs branch creation. - create_branch, when the branch is already on disk with no commits of its own, resets it onto the freshly-pulled base — the dependent now builds on the current integration tip. A branch carrying real commits is left untouched, so no work is discarded; the cell->leaf cascade carries the upstream down to the dev branch automatically. * refactor(gateway): drop the sibling-sequence claim guard Sibling sequence no longer gates a claim. Cross-cell ordering is enforced by task dependencies — a cell task that depends on another is held until its upstream reaches a terminal state, a stronger, status-aware gate than the sequence-number check. That check was dormant in practice anyway: every fan-out child carries sequence 0, on which the guard short-circuited. `sequence` stays a sibling-ordering / dispatch-priority field (list_pending ordering and the panel). Removes sibling_sequence_guard and its _earlier_blocking_sibling helper, the now-unused skip_sequence parameter threaded through the claim verbs, and the sibling fetch that fed it. * feat(gateway): sort a cross-cell dependent after its upstream When the frontend cell task is wired to depend on its UX/UI sibling, set its sequence to the upstream's sequence + 1 so it sorts after the design it waits on — list_pending ordering and the panel now show UX ahead of the implementation it gates, in either delegation order. Adds TaskService.set_sequence (the sibling-ordering field is a service write; it carries no claim-gating semantics — dependencies gate claims). * feat(gateway): make the backend cell depend on UX too UX/UI design defines the screens and API contracts both implementation cells build against, so the backend cell — not just the frontend — waits on the UX/UI cell task in a product fan-out and sorts after it. Wires in either delegation order: a backend task delegated after UX gets the dependency directly; a UX task delegated after a still-pending backend sibling retro-wires it. Mirrors the existing frontend wiring (_depend_backend_on_ux and _depend_pending_backends_on_ux). Backend is held by the same dependency gate, so it costs no extra dispatch churn. * fix(websocket): forward notification acks instead of logging them incomplete The bridge handler serves both notification.sent and notification.acked, but acked events carry `agent_id` (the acking agent) rather than `recipient_id`, so every acknowledgement tripped the missing-field guard and logged "Incomplete notification event" instead of reaching the panel. Accept either field as the recipient. * feat(api): hint the full UUID when a truncated task id fails validation Agents copy the 8-character task prefix the system shows them (the commit prefix, task summaries) and send it as task_id, which fails UUID validation with an opaque "invalid length" 422 and wastes a call. The request-validation handler now detects a task_id UUID error and attaches a `remediate` hint telling the agent to retry with the full 36-character UUID from its task envelope. * fix(audit): record the blocked transition when a task is escalated Escalation sets a task to blocked by writing task.status directly, which bypassed the validated transition helper and so never emitted a task.blocked audit row — the lifecycle moved but the Auditor saw nothing. Extract the audit emit from the central transition helper into _emit_status_transition_audit and call it from the escalate path, capturing the prior status and outgoing owner before reassignment so the row is attributed correctly. * fix(docs): stop doubling the docs path so design specs index into RAG The documenter sometimes hands a doc path already rooted at docs/, and joining it onto DOCS_BASE_PATH (/app/docs) produced /app/docs/docs/..., so the file was never found and the spec never indexed — the frontend cell could not retrieve the UX design over RAG. Normalize the path before joining: trust an absolute path, otherwise strip a single redundant leading docs/ segment. * feat(security): let the control panel authenticate in secure mode With ROBOCO_AGENT_AUTH_REQUIRED=true every request must carry a valid HMAC token, which locked the human control panel out — it sends role headers but no token. nginx, the only trusted hop between the browser and the API, now injects the CEO token on /api and /ws, so the browser never holds the signing secret. The injected value is just the existing per-agent token issued for the CEO identity (issue_panel_token), so the token-verification path is unchanged. An empty value (dev/header-trust mode) renders to no header. `make panel-token` prints the value; set it as ROBOCO_PANEL_AGENT_TOKEN in .env before enabling secure mode. .env.example and the README Security section document the flow. * chore(compose): consolidate the two compose files into one docker-compose.yml and docker-compose.yaml had diverged: .yml — the file Docker actually uses — carried ROBOCO_PUBLIC_BASE_URL but was missing the /app/manifests bind-mount, while .yaml had the manifests mount but not the base URL. Merge the union into docker-compose.yml and delete the duplicate so there is one source of truth and no "multiple config files" warning. This activates the manifests mount in the deployed file: without it the orchestrator writes per-agent tool manifests to its ephemeral container fs, they never reach the host for the daemon to bind-mount, and agents fall back to all-verbs registration. Drop the stale .yaml reference from the config.py docstring, the labeler, and the CI path filters. --------- Co-authored-by: Renn F <rennf93@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Renn F
|
d49d1cdb37 |
feat(gateway): developers author the full rich plan, at parity with PMs
A dev's i_will_work_on stored a flat {text} plan and routed steps to
progress, so the dev leaf's Plan tab rendered empty (no approach,
sub_tasks, technical_considerations, risks) — zero audit/tracing on the
task that does the actual work.
i_will_work_on now captures the same rich plan a PM authors via
i_will_plan: plan(>=150) doubles as approach, steps become sub_tasks,
plus technical_considerations + risks (open_questions optional). A new
_dev_plan_gate enforces them on FRESH claims only (re-entry/recovery
short-circuit before it). set_plan gains a no-downgrade guard so a
flaked-then-recovered dev can't clobber its rich plan back to flat (the
actual mechanism behind the empty leaf).
|
||
|
Renn F
|
4c397e1768 |
feat(gateway): developer i_will_work_on takes a substantive step checklist (#172)
The dev plan was a free string with only a presence gate, so the executing dev had no checklist for plan-driven progress (#173). - IWillWorkOnRequest gains `steps` (same SubTask shape as a PM's sub_tasks); flow_dev route threads it through. - i_will_work_on layers steps onto the narrative plan via the same panel-shaped path PMs use, so task.plan.sub_tasks is populated (panel render + #173 progress). - New _dev_steps_gate (mirrors _pm_sub_tasks_gate, runs after the spec gate): a developer FRESH claim must supply a non-empty steps list with every description >= _PM_SUBTASK_DESC_MIN_LEN. Re-entry/recovery short-circuit before the gate (extracted _dev_reentry + _fresh_dev_claim keep i_will_work_on within the return-count + cyclomatic gates). - developer role prompt: steps template + "thin steps rejected" + the progress(plan_step=...) handoff. - Updated every dev-fresh-claim test fixture across the suite to pass substantive steps; added dedicated _dev_steps_gate coverage. Commit 2 of 3 for the plan/progress quality work (#171/#172/#173). |
||
|
Renn F
|
ed828a719b |
feat(gateway): substantive-plan gate — approach >=150 + real sub_task descriptions (#171)
Plans were vague because the gate accepted the bare minimum: PM approach >=20 chars and title-only sub_tasks. minimax wrote exactly the minimum. - IWillPlanRequest.approach min_length 20 -> 150 (kept in sync with _PM_APPROACH_MIN_LEN; the gate enforces it at the choreographer layer too so direct/MCP callers can't bypass the HTTP boundary). - New _thin_subtask_hint: every PM sub_task must have a title and a description >= _PM_SUBTASK_DESC_MIN_LEN (60) saying what the step does — each sub_task is both a delegate target AND a progress-checklist item, so a title alone is not a plan. - cell_pm/main_pm role prompts: explicit "the gate REJECTS thin plans" framing + concrete sub_task example + the new minimums. - Updated all affected test fixtures across the suite to use substantive approaches/descriptions; added thin-sub_task rejection coverage. Commit 1 of 3 for the plan/progress quality work (#171/#172/#173). |
||
|
Renn F
|
41ef7f6b4e |
feat(gateway): C8 PM-decision gate windowed satisfaction
_check_pm_decision_required now requires the latest journal:decision within pm_decision_window_seconds (default 300). Older decisions no longer satisfy the gate. Adds JournalService.latest_decision_at. Future-tighten (out of scope): per-verb-group consumption tracking would need persistent state — Choreographer is per-request today. |
||
|
Renn F
|
a1009c05e8 |
feat(gateway): A1 plan-required-at-claim gate
i_will_plan now requires approach (min_length=20) at the schema and non-empty sub_tasks at the gateway when the caller is a PM role. Restores pre-gateway parity for _validate_claimed_start — agents could not transition claimed -> in_progress without filling the rich plan. Smoke run 3 (2026-05-11) showed PMs calling i_will_plan with just plan='paragraph' and the gateway accepting it; Plan tab stayed empty because no agent filled approach/sub_tasks/risks/open_questions. Spec ref: docs/superpowers/specs/2026-05-12-post-smoke-3-fixes-design.md section A1. |
||
|
|
207aaecd72 |
Feature: lifecycle canonical spec (#14)
* chore: clean make quality baseline on feature/lifecycle-canonical-spec
Three classes of pre-existing issues blocking `make quality`:
1. Alembic migrations 002/009/011 used runtime introspection
(op.get_bind() + inspect / bind.execute) without guarding for
offline (--sql) mode. `alembic upgrade head --sql` is part of
`make quality`; in offline mode `op.get_bind()` returns a
MockConnection with no inspection system, so the migrations
crashed before emitting their SQL stubs. Each migration now
short-circuits or simplifies in `context.is_offline_mode()` —
live-DB behavior is unchanged.
2. ruff format drift on three files left over from prior in-flight
edits (choreographer/_impl.py, content_actions.py, and one test
file). `ruff format` applied.
3. vulture flagged two unused `tb` parameters in async __aexit__
stubs in test_task_service_lifecycle_misc.py. The parameter is
protocol-required but unused by the body — renamed to `_tb`
(vulture treats underscore-prefixed names as intentionally unused).
`make quality` is now green from this branch's HEAD; subsequent
lifecycle-spec work can use it as the per-task gate.
* feat(lifecycle): canonical spec package + Role/Status/TaskType enums
Foundation for the canonical lifecycle/permissions module. Enums
mirror docs/internal/old/workflows/STATUS_TRANSITIONS.md +
PERMISSIONS.md. Tests pin enum membership against both the
predecessor canon and roboco.models.base.TaskType.
* feat(lifecycle): Decision dataclass with allow/reject/tracing_gap constructors
Single rejection shape every consumer maps to its native format
(Envelope, HTTP code, prompt hint). __post_init__ enforces the
allowed/rejection_kind invariants so a malformed Decision can't reach
a consumer.
* fix(lifecycle): tighten Decision invariants per Task 2 review
Two reviewer findings on the Task 2 Decision dataclass, addressed
in one commit:
1. The docstring promised `allowed=True ⇒ rejection_kind is None
AND missing == [] AND remediate is None`, but __post_init__ only
checked the rejection_kind half. A caller could construct an
allow-shaped Decision with stale missing/remediate fields and
sneak it past validation. Tighten __post_init__ to enforce the
full invariant. Add a regression test.
2. tracing_gap defensively copies the missing list (`list(missing)`)
to isolate the stored list from later caller-side mutation, but
no test pinned this. Add a regression test that mutates the source
list after construction and asserts the stored list is unchanged.
Issue 2 from the same review (mutable list vs tuple for `missing`)
is a broader design call deferred until consumers exist; the
defensive copy is sufficient until then.
* feat(lifecycle): Precondition/ActionSpec/IntentSpec/StatusTransition dataclasses
The four dataclasses that hold the canonical tables. ActionSpec and
StatusTransition are direct ports of pre-gateway PERMISSIONS.md +
STATUS_TRANSITIONS.md rows. IntentSpec is the gateway-only addition:
each gateway intent verb declares which atomic actions it composes.
* feat(lifecycle): _STATUS_TRANSITIONS table + STATUS_GRAPH view
Direct port of STATUS_TRANSITIONS.md. Every transition records its
trigger action and (optionally) a role constraint. STATUS_GRAPH is
the precomputed source→{targets} view callers use for reachability
checks.
* fix(lifecycle): pin role_constraint values + clarify Task-5 handoff
Two reviewer findings on Task 4 _STATUS_TRANSITIONS, addressed in
one commit:
1. The original Task-4 tests verified (source, target) pairs but
not role_constraint contents. A typo in a single role name (e.g.
forgetting MAIN_PM from escalate_to_ceo) would have slipped past
them silently. Add test_status_transitions_role_constraints_match_canon
pinning every non-None constraint and the cancel-block invariant.
2. role_constraint=None on the `claim` rows from PENDING and
NEEDS_REVISION was load-bearing — it is the explicit handoff
point between the StatusTransition table (state machine layer)
and CLAIM_RULES (per-role claim authority, lands in Task 5).
The original inline comment said this in passing; expand it so
the design choice is unmissable for a stranger reading just
spec.py.
* feat(lifecycle): _ATOMIC_ACTIONS + CLAIM_RULES + ROLE_TEAM_RULES tables
Direct port of PERMISSIONS.md. Every task management tool gets an
ActionSpec with allowed_roles, source_statuses, target_status,
self_review_block, and needs_team_match flags. CLAIM_RULES maps each
Role to the statuses they can claim from. ROLE_TEAM_RULES is the
per-slug team restriction.
* fix(lifecycle): tighten ActionSpec contracts per Task 5 review
Three reviewer findings on Task 5's _ATOMIC_ACTIONS table, addressed
in one commit:
1. set_plan.source_statuses widened to {CLAIMED, IN_PROGRESS} but
every existing caller (i_will_work_on / i_will_plan compositions)
runs set_plan while CLAIMED, between claim and start. Narrow to
{CLAIMED} only. If a future "edit plan mid-flight" feature lands,
widen explicitly with test coverage at that time.
2. needs_team_match was set True only on claim/qa_pass/qa_fail/
docs_complete. Defense-in-depth says every role-scoped task
action should re-assert team match (don't rely on the inheritance
chain through assigned_to alone). Flip to True on: start,
set_plan, block, pause, submit_verification, submit_qa,
submit_pm_review, complete, create_subtask. Leave False on
board/CEO actions and PM cross-cell interventions (unblock,
resume, cancel) where the cross-cell semantics are intentional.
3. claim.source_statuses is intentionally a SUPERSET of any single
role's CLAIM_RULES allowance (the table holds the union; CLAIM_RULES
holds the per-role authority). Add an inline comment above the
claim ActionSpec so a future reader doesn't conclude the two
tables disagree — they don't, they encode overlapping facts at
different grains.
* feat(lifecycle): _INTENT_VERBS table — every gateway verb declared
Each gateway intent verb is now a named composition of atomic actions
plus optional side effects. i_will_work_on = (claim, set_plan, start);
i_am_done = (submit_verification, submit_qa); open_pr is pure side
effects (push_branch, create_pr); etc.
* fix(lifecycle): widen block.allowed_roles to include QA + Documenter
Task 6 review caught a role-set inconsistency: i_am_blocked.allowed_roles
admits dev/QA/doc, but the underlying block.allowed_roles only allowed
dev+PM. Result: a QA or documenter calling i_am_blocked would pass the
IntentSpec gate and then be rejected by the composed ActionSpec gate
when Task 7 wires can_invoke_intent.
Widen block to include QA + Documenter. The semantic case is sound: a
QA reviewing a task can discover an external blocker; a documenter
writing docs may need PM intervention. Predecessor PERMISSIONS.md
restricted block to dev+PM, but with the gateway exposing i_am_blocked
to all worker roles, the underlying atomic must agree.
The deeper unclaim/escalate_up "imperative verb" concern from the same
review (composes=() but mutates state) is deferred to Task 8 where the
validator design lands.
* feat(lifecycle): public lookup functions + Context + preconditions
can_claim, can_invoke_action, can_invoke_intent, valid_next_verbs,
composed_actions_for, intents_for_role, status_after — the entire
public surface every consumer will use. Context carries the
caller-supplied state preconditions need (plan, journal-decision
flag, etc.). Preconditions for plan/commits/no_pr/ownership are
declared once and wired into the relevant IntentSpecs.
* fix(lifecycle): wire PRECONDITION_OWNERSHIP through Context.actor_id
Task 7 review found _p_owns_task reads agent.id but every call site
passes None for the agent arg. Result: getattr(None, "id", object())
returns a fresh sentinel, task.assigned_to == <sentinel> is always
False, and open_pr / i_am_done would reject every owner the moment
Task 9 wires consumers.
Fix: thread identity through Context.actor_id (new UUID field) and
rewrite _p_owns_task to read from the context. Both call sites already
pass the Context — no signature changes elsewhere. Add green-path
test exercising the owner-can-open-pr case the existing tests
missed (the Task 7 plan only tested precondition-failure paths,
which masked the bug).
Plus surface hygiene: STATUS_GRAPH, CLAIM_RULES, ROLE_TEAM_RULES,
and the four PRECONDITION_* constants are now in
roboco.lifecycle.__init__.__all__ so consumers in Tasks 8/9 don't
depend on the implicit `from roboco.lifecycle.spec import ...`
backdoor.
* feat(lifecycle): import-time self-consistency validators
10 validators run at module import; first failure raises
LifecycleSpecError and prevents the package from loading. Covers
status enum coverage, reachability, terminal exits, intent
compositions, status chain consistency, claim-rule role/status
coverage, self-review symmetry, team-rule slug existence, and
StatusTransition action references.
* fix(lifecycle): close validator gaps; resolve BACKLOG-claim and submit_qa IN_PROGRESS-shortcut ambiguity
Three reviewer follow-ups on Task 8's _validate.py, plus two real
data corrections the new action-target-reachability validator
surfaced.
1. Design spec §9 calls for "every ActionSpec.target_status, when
set, is reachable from each source_status via STATUS_GRAPH" —
missing from Task 8's 10 validators. Add
_check_action_target_reachable_from_source.
2. _check_role_team_rules_slugs verified slug existence in
AGENT_UUIDS but NOT that the cell team in ROLE_TEAM_RULES
matches the seed. Add _check_role_team_rules_team_match,
scoped to non-None entries only — None means "exempt from
team-match enforcement" (cross-cell roles), not "no team in
org chart".
3. test_validators_pass_on_real_spec was ceremonial. Add
test_run_all_validators_raises_on_unknown_intent_action,
a deliberate-break regression that monkeypatches _INTENT_VERBS
to inject a fake action and asserts LifecycleSpecError raises.
The new action-target-reachability validator caught two real
data inconsistencies between the predecessor canon docs and the
spec tables:
A. claim.source_statuses listed BACKLOG and CLAIM_RULES[*PM]
listed BACKLOG, but STATUS_GRAPH[BACKLOG] = {PENDING, CANCELLED}
only. Resolution: PMs use the explicit \`activate\` action to
move BACKLOG → PENDING, then claim from PENDING. Drop BACKLOG
from claim.source_statuses and CLAIM_RULES.
B. submit_qa.source_statuses listed IN_PROGRESS, but
STATUS_GRAPH[IN_PROGRESS] does NOT include AWAITING_QA. The
intent verb i_am_done composes (submit_verification, submit_qa)
which forces IN_PROGRESS → VERIFYING → AWAITING_QA — no
shortcut. Drop the stale IN_PROGRESS entry from
submit_qa.source_statuses.
Both corrections tighten the canonical state machine to a strict
no-skip transition graph. Pre-gateway PERMISSIONS.md/STATUS_TRANSITIONS.md
disagreements are resolved here; spec.py is the canon now.
* feat(gateway): Envelope.from_decision maps lifecycle Decisions to envelopes
Single shape adapter so verb bodies stop hand-composing rejection
envelopes. Each rejection_kind maps to a specific envelope flavor;
'self_review' folds into 'not_authorized' with a parenthetical hint;
constructing from an allow Decision raises (programmer error).
* feat(gateway): VerbRunner for atomic composed-action dispatch
Wraps spec.composed_actions_for(intent) in session.begin_nested()
so mid-sequence failures roll the DB back. Side effects run AFTER
the savepoint commits. Each atomic action name dispatches to a
TaskService method via a single, exhaustive _dispatch_atomic
mapping. New verbs slot in by adding an IntentSpec entry + a
_dispatch_atomic case if a new atomic is needed.
* refactor(gateway): i_will_work_on uses spec.can_invoke_intent + VerbRunner
Replace the bespoke status-branch dispatcher in i_will_work_on with the
spec-driven flow: load task -> load agent -> build spec.Context ->
spec.can_invoke_intent (and spec.can_claim for per-role status authority)
-> Envelope.from_decision on rejection -> VerbRunner.run_intent on success.
The _i_will_work_on_pending, _i_will_work_on_claimed,
_i_will_work_on_needs_revision, and _start_failed_envelope helpers are
removed; the runner replaces them. Two narrow verb-body re-entry blocks
remain for behaviors the spec does not yet model:
1. in_progress + same agent -> idempotent heartbeat-only return
2. claimed + same agent -> _resume_from_claimed (set_plan + start)
to recover from a stuck mid-claim crash without re-running claim
against a state the spec excludes.
The behavioral claim guards (already_active / paused / sibling_sequence)
also stay imperative for now -- they're not in the spec yet and migrate
into spec.extra_preconditions in a later task. Per-role claim authority
is enforced via spec.can_claim because the atomic claim action's
source_statuses are the union across roles; CLAIM_RULES narrows.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py runs the verb
against every (role x status x task_type='code') combo (112 rows) and
asserts the envelope error matches the spec's Decision (or can_claim's
Decision when the intent gate passes but per-role claim authority does
not). This is the contract that makes spec/verb drift impossible.
Existing tests updated where rejection-message text changed (the spec
now produces the messages, e.g. "role 'cell_pm' may not call
'i_will_work_on'" instead of "PM cannot execute code") or where the
spec's stricter view ("invalid_state" -> "not_authorized" for a dev
trying to claim awaiting_qa) is more accurate. Test fixtures were
updated to wire task.session.begin_nested as a proper async context
manager (required by VerbRunner) and to set agent_for().id so runner-
driven calls line up with assert_awaited_with(task_id, agent_id).
* refactor(lifecycle): push CLAIM_RULES enforcement into can_invoke_action
Task 11's i_will_work_on migration had to call spec.can_claim()
separately after spec.can_invoke_intent() because the claim action's
source_statuses is the union across all claim-eligible roles —
can_invoke_intent alone would let a developer pass for claiming
awaiting_qa (a QA-only state).
The retrofit pattern would repeat in every claim-composing verb
(i_will_plan, claim_review, claim_doc_task). Push the per-role
narrowing inside can_invoke_action when the action is "claim",
using the same not_authorized vs invalid_state disambiguation
can_claim already implemented (status-reserved-for-another-role
returns not_authorized; status-no-role-can-claim returns
invalid_state). Extracted the body to _check_claim_rules_narrow
to keep can_invoke_action under xenon's complexity threshold.
Update _i_will_work_on_gate to drop the redundant spec.can_claim
call. Update test_consumer_parity.py to assert only against
can_invoke_intent's Decision.
Tasks 12-22 will inherit the cleaner pattern: spec.can_invoke_intent
is the single gate; verb bodies don't need per-action retrofits.
* refactor(gateway): i_will_plan uses spec.can_invoke_intent + VerbRunner
Migrates i_will_plan to the spec-driven pattern Task 11 set up for
i_will_work_on. The verb body now: (1) loads task + agent, (2) builds
Context, (3) checks idempotent/recovery re-entry, (4) calls
spec.can_invoke_intent, (5) returns Envelope.from_decision on
rejection, (6) delegates composition to VerbRunner. The
_i_will_plan_* helpers are removed — the runner replaces them.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py runs the verb
against every (role × status × task_type) combo and asserts the
envelope matches spec.Decision.
* refactor(gateway): delegate uses spec.can_invoke_intent for role/state gate
Migrates delegate to the spec-driven role/state gate. The chain
validation (main_pm->cell_pm, cell_pm->its team's devs), the
assignee-vs-task_type rule (Cell PMs receive planning-typed only),
the enum coercion, and the parent-lifecycle/cap guards STAY in the
verb body — they encode delegate-specific semantics the spec
doesn't model.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py asserts the
spec's role+state rejection is correctly surfaced. Chain/assignee
rejections continue to be tested in test_choreographer_pm_extras.
* refactor(gateway): open_pr uses spec.can_invoke_intent + VerbRunner
Migrates open_pr to spec-driven gating. The spec's
extra_preconditions (PRECONDITION_OWNERSHIP, PRECONDITION_COMMITS,
PRECONDITION_NO_PR) handle all three precondition checks; the verb
body delegates side-effect dispatch (push_branch, create_pr) to
VerbRunner.
Idempotent re-entry retained: an open_pr call against a task that
already has a PR (and the caller owns it) returns OK without
re-opening, rather than the tracing_gap the spec would otherwise
produce. This preserves agent ergonomics — two calls in a row
shouldn't surface a misleading "no_prior_pr" hint.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py runs the verb
against representative (status x commits x pr_number) combos and
asserts the envelope matches spec.Decision.
* refactor(gateway): i_am_done uses spec.can_invoke_intent + VerbRunner
Migrates i_am_done to spec-driven gating. The spec's
extra_preconditions (PRECONDITION_OWNERSHIP, PRECONDITION_COMMITS)
handle ownership and commit-count checks; VerbRunner dispatches
the (submit_verification, submit_qa) atomic chain.
The tracing-gate preconditions (progress entry, journal:reflect,
acceptance criteria) and the field-level submit-qa gates stay in
the verb body — they model gates the spec doesn't yet cover.
Defense-in-depth: those gates run after the spec accepts the
ownership/commits checks.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py runs the
verb against (role × status × ownership × commits) and asserts
the envelope matches spec.Decision.
* refactor(gateway): i_am_blocked uses spec.can_invoke_intent + VerbRunner
Migrates i_am_blocked to spec-driven gating. The journal:struggle
write stays in the verb body (it's a side effect outside the
lifecycle action). VerbRunner dispatches the `block` atomic action
via task_service.escalate.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py.
* refactor(gateway): unclaim and resume use spec.can_invoke_intent
Migrates both verbs to the spec-driven gate. unclaim's verb body
keeps its dispatch (task.unclaim_for_agent) because composes=();
resume goes through VerbRunner with composes=("resume",).
The reassignment-rejection branch (introduced in
|
||
|
Renn F
|
01ff44b83f |
fix(gateway): unblock PM planning + drop magic delegate task_type
Two coupled fixes from the 2026-05-08 smoke-test trace: 1. pm_cannot_execute_code is now scoped to i_will_work_on (the EXECUTION verb) only. Pre-fix it also fired on i_will_plan, which deadlocked any code-typed parent: cell_pm couldn't plan, so couldn't transition parent to in_progress, so couldn't delegate. PMs PLAN code-typed parents and DELEGATE the work — that's exactly the verb we were blocking. 2. delegate.task_type is now REQUIRED at both the HTTP boundary (DelegateRequest) and the choreographer dataclass (DelegateInputs). The pre-fix default of 'code' silently changed semantics whenever a caller forgot the field — main-pm's call in the smoke trace omitted it, schema defaulted to 'code', and the cell PM downstream was wedged. Also drops the choreographer's task.task_type fallback (the DB column is NOT NULL anyway). Plus middleware coverage tests for the parallel ServiceError → 4xx handler hierarchy added in the prior session, restoring 100% coverage across the touched files. Tests: 3101 passing, 100% coverage, ruff clean. |
||
|
Renn F
|
9bae446cbe | Linting/Formatting | ||
|
Renn F
|
c33340bda1 |
fix(gateway): correct claim/start argument order in choreographer
Service signatures are (task_id, agent_id, ...) but choreographer was calling (agent_id, task_id). Production claim path silently returned None; unit tests pinned the buggy order so the bug was invisible. Swap all 7 call sites and update test assertions. Add a regression pin that locks in the correct order. |
||
|
Renn FandClaude Opus 4.7
|
5c0011c90b |
feat(gateway): restore Gate Set A claim-time guards
Ports five pre-gateway predicates that were dropped when the gateway
displaced the MCP claim handler. Predicates restored from
roboco/mcp/tasks/handlers/_helpers.py:124-204 and
roboco/mcp/tasks/handlers/claim.py:121-180 at commit
|