mirror of
https://github.com/rennf93/roboco.git
synced 2026-08-03 07:23:24 +02:00
77771c280c192d544cddb17503448961729339fc
11
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
06682f33c6 |
Fix: agent workflow hardening (#70)
* fix(gateway): push the branch before QA handoff so reviewers see the latest commits The commit content tool commits locally without pushing; only open_pr pushed the branch. On the first submission that was fine, but a fix committed while addressing needs_revision never reached origin (open_pr is skipped once the PR exists), so QA — which reviews the remote PR branch — re-reviewed the stale remote and re-failed the task on every cycle, a loop that never converged. i_am_done now pushes the task branch (idempotent; a no-op when nothing is unpushed) as part of the shared submit gate, covering both the normal and resume-from-verifying paths. A push failure blocks the handoff with a clear remediation rather than parking the task in awaiting_qa with commits that exist only in the developer's local workspace. * fix(orchestrator): don't reap a stale claim while the agent's container is alive The stale-claim reaper released any claimed/in_progress task whose last_heartbeat_at exceeded the TTL. The heartbeat only updates on certain gateway calls, so a developer deep in a long edit/test cycle outran the TTL and had its claim reaped mid-work — churning the task and risking a double spawn against the still-running container. The reaper now skips a task whose assignee still holds a live (ACTIVE) agent instance, trusting container liveness — the ground truth — over the heartbeat proxy. The check is defensive on missing fields so a heartbeat-only caller (and the reaper's existing unit tests) behave exactly as before. * fix(gateway): refuse to unblock a task while a dependency is unfinished A PM unblock on a dependency-gated task moved it straight to in_progress, overriding the dependency — letting a dependent proceed without its upstream's work (e.g. a frontend task built before its UX design lands). A dependency block is meant to clear on its own via _unblock_dependents the moment the upstream reaches a terminal state. unblock now refuses while any dependency is still non-terminal, returning a clear remediation that the block resolves automatically. Manual unblock remains available for genuine, non-dependency blockers. * fix(gateway): release a dependency-blocked claim to pending instead of looping A task that reached claimed/in_progress with an unfinished dependency was left in that state when the claim guard rejected, so the orchestrator's respawn loop kept reviving its assignee — which could make no progress — burning work for nothing. The claim guard now releases such a task back to pending. claimed -> blocked is not a legal transition, so pending — held by the dispatch dependency filter — is the lifecycle-correct resting state: the respawn loop ignores pending tasks, and _unblock_dependents re-dispatches it once the upstream reaches a terminal state. release_dependency_blocked_claim shares a _force_unclaim_to_pending core with unclaim_for_reaper so both record a truthful work-session abandon reason. * feat(security): warn at startup in header-trust mode + document the auth posture When ROBOCO_AGENT_AUTH_REQUIRED is not enabled the API accepts the X-Agent-Id / X-Agent-Role headers without a signed token, so any client that can reach it may act as any role (including 'ceo'). The API now logs a clear warning at startup in this mode, and the README gains a Security section documenting the auth posture and how to harden it. Acceptable only on a trusted private network — do not expose the API to untrusted networks. * fix(workspace): scope the refresh fetch to current + default branch ensure_workspace's healthy short-circuit ran an all-refs 'git fetch origin' to keep every origin/<branch> ref current. On a monorepo with many accumulated feature/* branches that exceeds the refresh timeout, the fetch silently fails, and the workspace keeps a stale base — so an agent builds on an out-of-date branch. The refresh now fetches only the workspace's current branch and the repo's default branch (resolved via origin/HEAD), with --no-tags --prune: it transfers near-nothing and can't time out. Readers need their own branch and the default; the integration branch is refreshed at branch-creation time. * fix(git): refresh a dependency-blocked task's branch off the current integration tip A cross-cell dependent (e.g. a frontend task waiting on the UX design) was branched off a base captured before its upstream merged into the integration branch, and the branch was never re-synced — so the agent built on a stale snapshot with none of the upstream's work. Two changes close the gap: - release_dependency_blocked_claim now clears branch_name, so the re-claim (after the dependency clears) re-runs branch creation. - create_branch, when the branch is already on disk with no commits of its own, resets it onto the freshly-pulled base — the dependent now builds on the current integration tip. A branch carrying real commits is left untouched, so no work is discarded; the cell->leaf cascade carries the upstream down to the dev branch automatically. * refactor(gateway): drop the sibling-sequence claim guard Sibling sequence no longer gates a claim. Cross-cell ordering is enforced by task dependencies — a cell task that depends on another is held until its upstream reaches a terminal state, a stronger, status-aware gate than the sequence-number check. That check was dormant in practice anyway: every fan-out child carries sequence 0, on which the guard short-circuited. `sequence` stays a sibling-ordering / dispatch-priority field (list_pending ordering and the panel). Removes sibling_sequence_guard and its _earlier_blocking_sibling helper, the now-unused skip_sequence parameter threaded through the claim verbs, and the sibling fetch that fed it. * feat(gateway): sort a cross-cell dependent after its upstream When the frontend cell task is wired to depend on its UX/UI sibling, set its sequence to the upstream's sequence + 1 so it sorts after the design it waits on — list_pending ordering and the panel now show UX ahead of the implementation it gates, in either delegation order. Adds TaskService.set_sequence (the sibling-ordering field is a service write; it carries no claim-gating semantics — dependencies gate claims). * feat(gateway): make the backend cell depend on UX too UX/UI design defines the screens and API contracts both implementation cells build against, so the backend cell — not just the frontend — waits on the UX/UI cell task in a product fan-out and sorts after it. Wires in either delegation order: a backend task delegated after UX gets the dependency directly; a UX task delegated after a still-pending backend sibling retro-wires it. Mirrors the existing frontend wiring (_depend_backend_on_ux and _depend_pending_backends_on_ux). Backend is held by the same dependency gate, so it costs no extra dispatch churn. * fix(websocket): forward notification acks instead of logging them incomplete The bridge handler serves both notification.sent and notification.acked, but acked events carry `agent_id` (the acking agent) rather than `recipient_id`, so every acknowledgement tripped the missing-field guard and logged "Incomplete notification event" instead of reaching the panel. Accept either field as the recipient. * feat(api): hint the full UUID when a truncated task id fails validation Agents copy the 8-character task prefix the system shows them (the commit prefix, task summaries) and send it as task_id, which fails UUID validation with an opaque "invalid length" 422 and wastes a call. The request-validation handler now detects a task_id UUID error and attaches a `remediate` hint telling the agent to retry with the full 36-character UUID from its task envelope. * fix(audit): record the blocked transition when a task is escalated Escalation sets a task to blocked by writing task.status directly, which bypassed the validated transition helper and so never emitted a task.blocked audit row — the lifecycle moved but the Auditor saw nothing. Extract the audit emit from the central transition helper into _emit_status_transition_audit and call it from the escalate path, capturing the prior status and outgoing owner before reassignment so the row is attributed correctly. * fix(docs): stop doubling the docs path so design specs index into RAG The documenter sometimes hands a doc path already rooted at docs/, and joining it onto DOCS_BASE_PATH (/app/docs) produced /app/docs/docs/..., so the file was never found and the spec never indexed — the frontend cell could not retrieve the UX design over RAG. Normalize the path before joining: trust an absolute path, otherwise strip a single redundant leading docs/ segment. * feat(security): let the control panel authenticate in secure mode With ROBOCO_AGENT_AUTH_REQUIRED=true every request must carry a valid HMAC token, which locked the human control panel out — it sends role headers but no token. nginx, the only trusted hop between the browser and the API, now injects the CEO token on /api and /ws, so the browser never holds the signing secret. The injected value is just the existing per-agent token issued for the CEO identity (issue_panel_token), so the token-verification path is unchanged. An empty value (dev/header-trust mode) renders to no header. `make panel-token` prints the value; set it as ROBOCO_PANEL_AGENT_TOKEN in .env before enabling secure mode. .env.example and the README Security section document the flow. * chore(compose): consolidate the two compose files into one docker-compose.yml and docker-compose.yaml had diverged: .yml — the file Docker actually uses — carried ROBOCO_PUBLIC_BASE_URL but was missing the /app/manifests bind-mount, while .yaml had the manifests mount but not the base URL. Merge the union into docker-compose.yml and delete the duplicate so there is one source of truth and no "multiple config files" warning. This activates the manifests mount in the deployed file: without it the orchestrator writes per-agent tool manifests to its ephemeral container fs, they never reach the host for the daemon to bind-mount, and agents fall back to all-verbs registration. Drop the stale .yaml reference from the config.py docstring, the labeler, and the CI path filters. --------- Co-authored-by: Renn F <rennf93@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Renn F
|
d49d1cdb37 |
feat(gateway): developers author the full rich plan, at parity with PMs
A dev's i_will_work_on stored a flat {text} plan and routed steps to
progress, so the dev leaf's Plan tab rendered empty (no approach,
sub_tasks, technical_considerations, risks) — zero audit/tracing on the
task that does the actual work.
i_will_work_on now captures the same rich plan a PM authors via
i_will_plan: plan(>=150) doubles as approach, steps become sub_tasks,
plus technical_considerations + risks (open_questions optional). A new
_dev_plan_gate enforces them on FRESH claims only (re-entry/recovery
short-circuit before it). set_plan gains a no-downgrade guard so a
flaked-then-recovered dev can't clobber its rich plan back to flat (the
actual mechanism behind the empty leaf).
|
||
|
Renn F
|
4c397e1768 |
feat(gateway): developer i_will_work_on takes a substantive step checklist (#172)
The dev plan was a free string with only a presence gate, so the executing dev had no checklist for plan-driven progress (#173). - IWillWorkOnRequest gains `steps` (same SubTask shape as a PM's sub_tasks); flow_dev route threads it through. - i_will_work_on layers steps onto the narrative plan via the same panel-shaped path PMs use, so task.plan.sub_tasks is populated (panel render + #173 progress). - New _dev_steps_gate (mirrors _pm_sub_tasks_gate, runs after the spec gate): a developer FRESH claim must supply a non-empty steps list with every description >= _PM_SUBTASK_DESC_MIN_LEN. Re-entry/recovery short-circuit before the gate (extracted _dev_reentry + _fresh_dev_claim keep i_will_work_on within the return-count + cyclomatic gates). - developer role prompt: steps template + "thin steps rejected" + the progress(plan_step=...) handoff. - Updated every dev-fresh-claim test fixture across the suite to pass substantive steps; added dedicated _dev_steps_gate coverage. Commit 2 of 3 for the plan/progress quality work (#171/#172/#173). |
||
|
Renn F
|
ed828a719b |
feat(gateway): substantive-plan gate — approach >=150 + real sub_task descriptions (#171)
Plans were vague because the gate accepted the bare minimum: PM approach >=20 chars and title-only sub_tasks. minimax wrote exactly the minimum. - IWillPlanRequest.approach min_length 20 -> 150 (kept in sync with _PM_APPROACH_MIN_LEN; the gate enforces it at the choreographer layer too so direct/MCP callers can't bypass the HTTP boundary). - New _thin_subtask_hint: every PM sub_task must have a title and a description >= _PM_SUBTASK_DESC_MIN_LEN (60) saying what the step does — each sub_task is both a delegate target AND a progress-checklist item, so a title alone is not a plan. - cell_pm/main_pm role prompts: explicit "the gate REJECTS thin plans" framing + concrete sub_task example + the new minimums. - Updated all affected test fixtures across the suite to use substantive approaches/descriptions; added thin-sub_task rejection coverage. Commit 1 of 3 for the plan/progress quality work (#171/#172/#173). |
||
|
Renn F
|
41ef7f6b4e |
feat(gateway): C8 PM-decision gate windowed satisfaction
_check_pm_decision_required now requires the latest journal:decision within pm_decision_window_seconds (default 300). Older decisions no longer satisfy the gate. Adds JournalService.latest_decision_at. Future-tighten (out of scope): per-verb-group consumption tracking would need persistent state — Choreographer is per-request today. |
||
|
Renn F
|
a1009c05e8 |
feat(gateway): A1 plan-required-at-claim gate
i_will_plan now requires approach (min_length=20) at the schema and non-empty sub_tasks at the gateway when the caller is a PM role. Restores pre-gateway parity for _validate_claimed_start — agents could not transition claimed -> in_progress without filling the rich plan. Smoke run 3 (2026-05-11) showed PMs calling i_will_plan with just plan='paragraph' and the gateway accepting it; Plan tab stayed empty because no agent filled approach/sub_tasks/risks/open_questions. Spec ref: docs/superpowers/specs/2026-05-12-post-smoke-3-fixes-design.md section A1. |
||
|
|
207aaecd72 |
Feature: lifecycle canonical spec (#14)
* chore: clean make quality baseline on feature/lifecycle-canonical-spec
Three classes of pre-existing issues blocking `make quality`:
1. Alembic migrations 002/009/011 used runtime introspection
(op.get_bind() + inspect / bind.execute) without guarding for
offline (--sql) mode. `alembic upgrade head --sql` is part of
`make quality`; in offline mode `op.get_bind()` returns a
MockConnection with no inspection system, so the migrations
crashed before emitting their SQL stubs. Each migration now
short-circuits or simplifies in `context.is_offline_mode()` —
live-DB behavior is unchanged.
2. ruff format drift on three files left over from prior in-flight
edits (choreographer/_impl.py, content_actions.py, and one test
file). `ruff format` applied.
3. vulture flagged two unused `tb` parameters in async __aexit__
stubs in test_task_service_lifecycle_misc.py. The parameter is
protocol-required but unused by the body — renamed to `_tb`
(vulture treats underscore-prefixed names as intentionally unused).
`make quality` is now green from this branch's HEAD; subsequent
lifecycle-spec work can use it as the per-task gate.
* feat(lifecycle): canonical spec package + Role/Status/TaskType enums
Foundation for the canonical lifecycle/permissions module. Enums
mirror docs/internal/old/workflows/STATUS_TRANSITIONS.md +
PERMISSIONS.md. Tests pin enum membership against both the
predecessor canon and roboco.models.base.TaskType.
* feat(lifecycle): Decision dataclass with allow/reject/tracing_gap constructors
Single rejection shape every consumer maps to its native format
(Envelope, HTTP code, prompt hint). __post_init__ enforces the
allowed/rejection_kind invariants so a malformed Decision can't reach
a consumer.
* fix(lifecycle): tighten Decision invariants per Task 2 review
Two reviewer findings on the Task 2 Decision dataclass, addressed
in one commit:
1. The docstring promised `allowed=True ⇒ rejection_kind is None
AND missing == [] AND remediate is None`, but __post_init__ only
checked the rejection_kind half. A caller could construct an
allow-shaped Decision with stale missing/remediate fields and
sneak it past validation. Tighten __post_init__ to enforce the
full invariant. Add a regression test.
2. tracing_gap defensively copies the missing list (`list(missing)`)
to isolate the stored list from later caller-side mutation, but
no test pinned this. Add a regression test that mutates the source
list after construction and asserts the stored list is unchanged.
Issue 2 from the same review (mutable list vs tuple for `missing`)
is a broader design call deferred until consumers exist; the
defensive copy is sufficient until then.
* feat(lifecycle): Precondition/ActionSpec/IntentSpec/StatusTransition dataclasses
The four dataclasses that hold the canonical tables. ActionSpec and
StatusTransition are direct ports of pre-gateway PERMISSIONS.md +
STATUS_TRANSITIONS.md rows. IntentSpec is the gateway-only addition:
each gateway intent verb declares which atomic actions it composes.
* feat(lifecycle): _STATUS_TRANSITIONS table + STATUS_GRAPH view
Direct port of STATUS_TRANSITIONS.md. Every transition records its
trigger action and (optionally) a role constraint. STATUS_GRAPH is
the precomputed source→{targets} view callers use for reachability
checks.
* fix(lifecycle): pin role_constraint values + clarify Task-5 handoff
Two reviewer findings on Task 4 _STATUS_TRANSITIONS, addressed in
one commit:
1. The original Task-4 tests verified (source, target) pairs but
not role_constraint contents. A typo in a single role name (e.g.
forgetting MAIN_PM from escalate_to_ceo) would have slipped past
them silently. Add test_status_transitions_role_constraints_match_canon
pinning every non-None constraint and the cancel-block invariant.
2. role_constraint=None on the `claim` rows from PENDING and
NEEDS_REVISION was load-bearing — it is the explicit handoff
point between the StatusTransition table (state machine layer)
and CLAIM_RULES (per-role claim authority, lands in Task 5).
The original inline comment said this in passing; expand it so
the design choice is unmissable for a stranger reading just
spec.py.
* feat(lifecycle): _ATOMIC_ACTIONS + CLAIM_RULES + ROLE_TEAM_RULES tables
Direct port of PERMISSIONS.md. Every task management tool gets an
ActionSpec with allowed_roles, source_statuses, target_status,
self_review_block, and needs_team_match flags. CLAIM_RULES maps each
Role to the statuses they can claim from. ROLE_TEAM_RULES is the
per-slug team restriction.
* fix(lifecycle): tighten ActionSpec contracts per Task 5 review
Three reviewer findings on Task 5's _ATOMIC_ACTIONS table, addressed
in one commit:
1. set_plan.source_statuses widened to {CLAIMED, IN_PROGRESS} but
every existing caller (i_will_work_on / i_will_plan compositions)
runs set_plan while CLAIMED, between claim and start. Narrow to
{CLAIMED} only. If a future "edit plan mid-flight" feature lands,
widen explicitly with test coverage at that time.
2. needs_team_match was set True only on claim/qa_pass/qa_fail/
docs_complete. Defense-in-depth says every role-scoped task
action should re-assert team match (don't rely on the inheritance
chain through assigned_to alone). Flip to True on: start,
set_plan, block, pause, submit_verification, submit_qa,
submit_pm_review, complete, create_subtask. Leave False on
board/CEO actions and PM cross-cell interventions (unblock,
resume, cancel) where the cross-cell semantics are intentional.
3. claim.source_statuses is intentionally a SUPERSET of any single
role's CLAIM_RULES allowance (the table holds the union; CLAIM_RULES
holds the per-role authority). Add an inline comment above the
claim ActionSpec so a future reader doesn't conclude the two
tables disagree — they don't, they encode overlapping facts at
different grains.
* feat(lifecycle): _INTENT_VERBS table — every gateway verb declared
Each gateway intent verb is now a named composition of atomic actions
plus optional side effects. i_will_work_on = (claim, set_plan, start);
i_am_done = (submit_verification, submit_qa); open_pr is pure side
effects (push_branch, create_pr); etc.
* fix(lifecycle): widen block.allowed_roles to include QA + Documenter
Task 6 review caught a role-set inconsistency: i_am_blocked.allowed_roles
admits dev/QA/doc, but the underlying block.allowed_roles only allowed
dev+PM. Result: a QA or documenter calling i_am_blocked would pass the
IntentSpec gate and then be rejected by the composed ActionSpec gate
when Task 7 wires can_invoke_intent.
Widen block to include QA + Documenter. The semantic case is sound: a
QA reviewing a task can discover an external blocker; a documenter
writing docs may need PM intervention. Predecessor PERMISSIONS.md
restricted block to dev+PM, but with the gateway exposing i_am_blocked
to all worker roles, the underlying atomic must agree.
The deeper unclaim/escalate_up "imperative verb" concern from the same
review (composes=() but mutates state) is deferred to Task 8 where the
validator design lands.
* feat(lifecycle): public lookup functions + Context + preconditions
can_claim, can_invoke_action, can_invoke_intent, valid_next_verbs,
composed_actions_for, intents_for_role, status_after — the entire
public surface every consumer will use. Context carries the
caller-supplied state preconditions need (plan, journal-decision
flag, etc.). Preconditions for plan/commits/no_pr/ownership are
declared once and wired into the relevant IntentSpecs.
* fix(lifecycle): wire PRECONDITION_OWNERSHIP through Context.actor_id
Task 7 review found _p_owns_task reads agent.id but every call site
passes None for the agent arg. Result: getattr(None, "id", object())
returns a fresh sentinel, task.assigned_to == <sentinel> is always
False, and open_pr / i_am_done would reject every owner the moment
Task 9 wires consumers.
Fix: thread identity through Context.actor_id (new UUID field) and
rewrite _p_owns_task to read from the context. Both call sites already
pass the Context — no signature changes elsewhere. Add green-path
test exercising the owner-can-open-pr case the existing tests
missed (the Task 7 plan only tested precondition-failure paths,
which masked the bug).
Plus surface hygiene: STATUS_GRAPH, CLAIM_RULES, ROLE_TEAM_RULES,
and the four PRECONDITION_* constants are now in
roboco.lifecycle.__init__.__all__ so consumers in Tasks 8/9 don't
depend on the implicit `from roboco.lifecycle.spec import ...`
backdoor.
* feat(lifecycle): import-time self-consistency validators
10 validators run at module import; first failure raises
LifecycleSpecError and prevents the package from loading. Covers
status enum coverage, reachability, terminal exits, intent
compositions, status chain consistency, claim-rule role/status
coverage, self-review symmetry, team-rule slug existence, and
StatusTransition action references.
* fix(lifecycle): close validator gaps; resolve BACKLOG-claim and submit_qa IN_PROGRESS-shortcut ambiguity
Three reviewer follow-ups on Task 8's _validate.py, plus two real
data corrections the new action-target-reachability validator
surfaced.
1. Design spec §9 calls for "every ActionSpec.target_status, when
set, is reachable from each source_status via STATUS_GRAPH" —
missing from Task 8's 10 validators. Add
_check_action_target_reachable_from_source.
2. _check_role_team_rules_slugs verified slug existence in
AGENT_UUIDS but NOT that the cell team in ROLE_TEAM_RULES
matches the seed. Add _check_role_team_rules_team_match,
scoped to non-None entries only — None means "exempt from
team-match enforcement" (cross-cell roles), not "no team in
org chart".
3. test_validators_pass_on_real_spec was ceremonial. Add
test_run_all_validators_raises_on_unknown_intent_action,
a deliberate-break regression that monkeypatches _INTENT_VERBS
to inject a fake action and asserts LifecycleSpecError raises.
The new action-target-reachability validator caught two real
data inconsistencies between the predecessor canon docs and the
spec tables:
A. claim.source_statuses listed BACKLOG and CLAIM_RULES[*PM]
listed BACKLOG, but STATUS_GRAPH[BACKLOG] = {PENDING, CANCELLED}
only. Resolution: PMs use the explicit \`activate\` action to
move BACKLOG → PENDING, then claim from PENDING. Drop BACKLOG
from claim.source_statuses and CLAIM_RULES.
B. submit_qa.source_statuses listed IN_PROGRESS, but
STATUS_GRAPH[IN_PROGRESS] does NOT include AWAITING_QA. The
intent verb i_am_done composes (submit_verification, submit_qa)
which forces IN_PROGRESS → VERIFYING → AWAITING_QA — no
shortcut. Drop the stale IN_PROGRESS entry from
submit_qa.source_statuses.
Both corrections tighten the canonical state machine to a strict
no-skip transition graph. Pre-gateway PERMISSIONS.md/STATUS_TRANSITIONS.md
disagreements are resolved here; spec.py is the canon now.
* feat(gateway): Envelope.from_decision maps lifecycle Decisions to envelopes
Single shape adapter so verb bodies stop hand-composing rejection
envelopes. Each rejection_kind maps to a specific envelope flavor;
'self_review' folds into 'not_authorized' with a parenthetical hint;
constructing from an allow Decision raises (programmer error).
* feat(gateway): VerbRunner for atomic composed-action dispatch
Wraps spec.composed_actions_for(intent) in session.begin_nested()
so mid-sequence failures roll the DB back. Side effects run AFTER
the savepoint commits. Each atomic action name dispatches to a
TaskService method via a single, exhaustive _dispatch_atomic
mapping. New verbs slot in by adding an IntentSpec entry + a
_dispatch_atomic case if a new atomic is needed.
* refactor(gateway): i_will_work_on uses spec.can_invoke_intent + VerbRunner
Replace the bespoke status-branch dispatcher in i_will_work_on with the
spec-driven flow: load task -> load agent -> build spec.Context ->
spec.can_invoke_intent (and spec.can_claim for per-role status authority)
-> Envelope.from_decision on rejection -> VerbRunner.run_intent on success.
The _i_will_work_on_pending, _i_will_work_on_claimed,
_i_will_work_on_needs_revision, and _start_failed_envelope helpers are
removed; the runner replaces them. Two narrow verb-body re-entry blocks
remain for behaviors the spec does not yet model:
1. in_progress + same agent -> idempotent heartbeat-only return
2. claimed + same agent -> _resume_from_claimed (set_plan + start)
to recover from a stuck mid-claim crash without re-running claim
against a state the spec excludes.
The behavioral claim guards (already_active / paused / sibling_sequence)
also stay imperative for now -- they're not in the spec yet and migrate
into spec.extra_preconditions in a later task. Per-role claim authority
is enforced via spec.can_claim because the atomic claim action's
source_statuses are the union across roles; CLAIM_RULES narrows.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py runs the verb
against every (role x status x task_type='code') combo (112 rows) and
asserts the envelope error matches the spec's Decision (or can_claim's
Decision when the intent gate passes but per-role claim authority does
not). This is the contract that makes spec/verb drift impossible.
Existing tests updated where rejection-message text changed (the spec
now produces the messages, e.g. "role 'cell_pm' may not call
'i_will_work_on'" instead of "PM cannot execute code") or where the
spec's stricter view ("invalid_state" -> "not_authorized" for a dev
trying to claim awaiting_qa) is more accurate. Test fixtures were
updated to wire task.session.begin_nested as a proper async context
manager (required by VerbRunner) and to set agent_for().id so runner-
driven calls line up with assert_awaited_with(task_id, agent_id).
* refactor(lifecycle): push CLAIM_RULES enforcement into can_invoke_action
Task 11's i_will_work_on migration had to call spec.can_claim()
separately after spec.can_invoke_intent() because the claim action's
source_statuses is the union across all claim-eligible roles —
can_invoke_intent alone would let a developer pass for claiming
awaiting_qa (a QA-only state).
The retrofit pattern would repeat in every claim-composing verb
(i_will_plan, claim_review, claim_doc_task). Push the per-role
narrowing inside can_invoke_action when the action is "claim",
using the same not_authorized vs invalid_state disambiguation
can_claim already implemented (status-reserved-for-another-role
returns not_authorized; status-no-role-can-claim returns
invalid_state). Extracted the body to _check_claim_rules_narrow
to keep can_invoke_action under xenon's complexity threshold.
Update _i_will_work_on_gate to drop the redundant spec.can_claim
call. Update test_consumer_parity.py to assert only against
can_invoke_intent's Decision.
Tasks 12-22 will inherit the cleaner pattern: spec.can_invoke_intent
is the single gate; verb bodies don't need per-action retrofits.
* refactor(gateway): i_will_plan uses spec.can_invoke_intent + VerbRunner
Migrates i_will_plan to the spec-driven pattern Task 11 set up for
i_will_work_on. The verb body now: (1) loads task + agent, (2) builds
Context, (3) checks idempotent/recovery re-entry, (4) calls
spec.can_invoke_intent, (5) returns Envelope.from_decision on
rejection, (6) delegates composition to VerbRunner. The
_i_will_plan_* helpers are removed — the runner replaces them.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py runs the verb
against every (role × status × task_type) combo and asserts the
envelope matches spec.Decision.
* refactor(gateway): delegate uses spec.can_invoke_intent for role/state gate
Migrates delegate to the spec-driven role/state gate. The chain
validation (main_pm->cell_pm, cell_pm->its team's devs), the
assignee-vs-task_type rule (Cell PMs receive planning-typed only),
the enum coercion, and the parent-lifecycle/cap guards STAY in the
verb body — they encode delegate-specific semantics the spec
doesn't model.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py asserts the
spec's role+state rejection is correctly surfaced. Chain/assignee
rejections continue to be tested in test_choreographer_pm_extras.
* refactor(gateway): open_pr uses spec.can_invoke_intent + VerbRunner
Migrates open_pr to spec-driven gating. The spec's
extra_preconditions (PRECONDITION_OWNERSHIP, PRECONDITION_COMMITS,
PRECONDITION_NO_PR) handle all three precondition checks; the verb
body delegates side-effect dispatch (push_branch, create_pr) to
VerbRunner.
Idempotent re-entry retained: an open_pr call against a task that
already has a PR (and the caller owns it) returns OK without
re-opening, rather than the tracing_gap the spec would otherwise
produce. This preserves agent ergonomics — two calls in a row
shouldn't surface a misleading "no_prior_pr" hint.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py runs the verb
against representative (status x commits x pr_number) combos and
asserts the envelope matches spec.Decision.
* refactor(gateway): i_am_done uses spec.can_invoke_intent + VerbRunner
Migrates i_am_done to spec-driven gating. The spec's
extra_preconditions (PRECONDITION_OWNERSHIP, PRECONDITION_COMMITS)
handle ownership and commit-count checks; VerbRunner dispatches
the (submit_verification, submit_qa) atomic chain.
The tracing-gate preconditions (progress entry, journal:reflect,
acceptance criteria) and the field-level submit-qa gates stay in
the verb body — they model gates the spec doesn't yet cover.
Defense-in-depth: those gates run after the spec accepts the
ownership/commits checks.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py runs the
verb against (role × status × ownership × commits) and asserts
the envelope matches spec.Decision.
* refactor(gateway): i_am_blocked uses spec.can_invoke_intent + VerbRunner
Migrates i_am_blocked to spec-driven gating. The journal:struggle
write stays in the verb body (it's a side effect outside the
lifecycle action). VerbRunner dispatches the `block` atomic action
via task_service.escalate.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py.
* refactor(gateway): unclaim and resume use spec.can_invoke_intent
Migrates both verbs to the spec-driven gate. unclaim's verb body
keeps its dispatch (task.unclaim_for_agent) because composes=();
resume goes through VerbRunner with composes=("resume",).
The reassignment-rejection branch (introduced in
|
||
|
Renn F
|
01ff44b83f |
fix(gateway): unblock PM planning + drop magic delegate task_type
Two coupled fixes from the 2026-05-08 smoke-test trace: 1. pm_cannot_execute_code is now scoped to i_will_work_on (the EXECUTION verb) only. Pre-fix it also fired on i_will_plan, which deadlocked any code-typed parent: cell_pm couldn't plan, so couldn't transition parent to in_progress, so couldn't delegate. PMs PLAN code-typed parents and DELEGATE the work — that's exactly the verb we were blocking. 2. delegate.task_type is now REQUIRED at both the HTTP boundary (DelegateRequest) and the choreographer dataclass (DelegateInputs). The pre-fix default of 'code' silently changed semantics whenever a caller forgot the field — main-pm's call in the smoke trace omitted it, schema defaulted to 'code', and the cell PM downstream was wedged. Also drops the choreographer's task.task_type fallback (the DB column is NOT NULL anyway). Plus middleware coverage tests for the parallel ServiceError → 4xx handler hierarchy added in the prior session, restoring 100% coverage across the touched files. Tests: 3101 passing, 100% coverage, ruff clean. |
||
|
Renn F
|
9bae446cbe | Linting/Formatting | ||
|
Renn F
|
c33340bda1 |
fix(gateway): correct claim/start argument order in choreographer
Service signatures are (task_id, agent_id, ...) but choreographer was calling (agent_id, task_id). Production claim path silently returned None; unit tests pinned the buggy order so the bug was invisible. Swap all 7 call sites and update test assertions. Add a regression pin that locks in the correct order. |
||
|
Renn FandClaude Opus 4.7
|
5c0011c90b |
feat(gateway): restore Gate Set A claim-time guards
Ports five pre-gateway predicates that were dropped when the gateway
displaced the MCP claim handler. Predicates restored from
roboco/mcp/tasks/handlers/_helpers.py:124-204 and
roboco/mcp/tasks/handlers/claim.py:121-180 at commit
|