mirror of
https://github.com/rennf93/roboco.git
synced 2026-08-03 07:23:24 +02:00
0e7674af3de1e1d91c838c41466bcef5f33ce64b
7
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Renn F
|
0e7674af3d |
[chore] logical-gaps: verb_runner trailing-None side-effect guard + actor_agent_id threading (3 gaps)
_verb_runner.py: - run_intent skips the side_effects loop when a TRAILING composed action returned None (its source-status check failed under a concurrent transition). Previously the loop ran unconditionally on the None task and _do_push_branch(None)/_do_pr_merge(None) crashed with a NoneType AttributeError, turning the clean INVALID_STATE the entry/intermediate guards give into a 500/respawn loop. The trailing None now flows to the caller's `if task is None` handler. Latent today (no shipped intent has both a None-capable compose and trailing side_effects) but the runner is generic. (gap: runner-side-effects-fire- on-trailing-none-task) - _do_push_branch / _do_create_pr / _do_create_root_pr forward actor_agent_id=agent.id into git_service (push_branch / create_pr), matching _do_pr_merge. Without it, a verb on a task whose assigned_to was cleared before the side effect falls through to created_by and pushes from / opens a PR against the wrong workspace. (gap: side-effect-handlers-drop-actor-agent-id) - _do_escalate_to_ceo forwards actor_agent_id=agent.id so the awaiting_ceo_approval audit row attributes to the specific PM/Board agent. (gap: do-escalate-to-ceo-drops-actor-agent-id) task.py: escalate_to_ceo gains actor_agent_id param, passed as audit_agent_id to _validate_and_set_status and recorded as escalated_by_agent_id in the event payload + log. escalate_to_ceo_for_agent forwards agent.agent_id. _impl.py: the main_pm complete->escalate path forwards actor_agent_id=main_pm_agent_id. TDD: 5 red->green tests (synthetic trailing-None intent, actor forwarding for push_branch/create_pr/create_root_pr/escalate_to_ceo) + real-DB audit test asserting the awaiting_ceo_approval row carries the actor UUID. Updated 3 board escalate_to_ceo tests to assert the forwarded actor. |
||
|
|
2bd35e1c9e |
fix(run-hardening): stop three blocked-task respawn loops (#253)
* fix(run-hardening): stop three blocked-task respawn loops
Three independent fixes for blocked-task respawn loops observed in the live
run (the bleeders behind a wedged near-complete run):
- verb runner: re-check the working task after EACH composed atomic action,
not just at entry. A concurrent transition between a verb's precondition
gate and execution (e.g. a racing i_am_blocked moving a root from
needs_revision to blocked) made claim() return None mid-sequence; the next
composed step dereferenced None.id and crashed with the opaque
"'NoneType' object has no attribute 'id'", looping the PM. Now fails fast
with an actionable INVALID_STATE; the savepoint rolls the partial run back.
- blocker dispatch: never dispatch a Board role (product-owner / head-
marketing) as a blocker resolver. Board roles have no unblock verb, so the
dispatcher respawned one forever to "resolve" a blocker it could only
notify/triage about — one incident burned ~6400 tool calls on a single
mis-owned root. _blocker_resolver_slug now returns None for a Board
assignee so the dispatch skips it.
- git push: recover a missing local task-branch ref from origin/<branch>
before push-by-name. A re-provisioned shared clone can lack the branch
locally though its commits are on origin, so push died on
"src refspec <branch> does not match any" and the task wedged at i_am_done.
Now materializes the ref (no-op push when already on origin) or fails loud
with an unclaim+reclaim instruction when the work is on neither.
Adds regression tests for all three. Full no-DB gate green (ruff, reflow,
mypy, xenon); pytest+coverage validated by CI.
* fix(verb-runner): only raise on an INTERMEDIATE composed None, not the last
The mid-composition None-guard was too aggressive: it raised for a None
returned by the LAST composed action too (e.g. start()), preempting the
caller's existing `if task is None` handler that surfaces the verb-specific
message ("start failed for task ...", the board verb's decline envelope).
Three tests asserting those messages broke in CI.
Only an INTERMEDIATE None is fatal (the next action would deref None.id). A
None from the last action is the verb's own result and must flow out as the
runner's return value. Guard now fires only for position > 0, before the
next dispatch — still prevents the crash, preserves the last-action contract.
* fix(escalation): never hand a Main-PM coordination root to the Board
The upstream cause of the board catch-22 (which the orchestrator-side
blocker-dispatch guard only backstopped): the escalation chain points
main-pm -> product-owner, and i_am_blocked/escalate REASSIGNS the task to
that chain target. apply_escalation's board-advisory guard only refused
descendant cell tasks (both predicates require parent_task_id), so a
top-level Main-PM coordination root slipped through and the whole root was
reassigned to the Product Owner + marked blocked. The board has no unblock
verb, so it spam-notified the CEO and respawn-looped (~6400 tool calls on
one root).
Add _is_coordination_task (team == main_pm — covers a delivery root AND a
MegaTask root-subtask) and a shared _board_cannot_own predicate, applied at
all four board-refusal sites (escalation, reassign, reassign_active_claim,
dependency-revival). A main_pm coordination task escalated/reassigned onto a
board role is now diverted to the pool for a role-matched (Main-PM) reclaim.
Complements the blocker-dispatch backstop in the prior commits (defense in
depth). Tests: coordination-root predicate cases + apply_escalation divert;
existing teamless-root / board-root behavior unchanged.
---------
Co-authored-by: Renn F <rennf93@users.noreply.github.com>
|
||
|
Renn F
|
855e4aea54 |
fix(gateway): guard the verb runner against a None task/agent
The runner's atomic steps dereference task.id / agent.id with no None-check, so a verb invoked when the task or agent could not be resolved crashed with a cryptic "'NoneType' object has no attribute 'id'" (observed on i_will_plan for a task forced into an unexpected state out-of-band). Fail fast at run_intent's entry with an actionable INVALID_STATE error instead. |
||
|
|
5fe1e6df58 |
feat: in-path PR-review gate — per-cell + main reviewers (#229)
* feat(lifecycle): add the in-path PR-review gate status + reviewer verbs
Insert awaiting_pr_review between the assembled-PR submit and the PM merge,
giving the merge level the rejection capability it structurally lacks — today
only qa_fail and ceo_reject ever reach needs_revision, so a PM review is a
merge button with no teeth.
- New Status awaiting_pr_review + submit_for_review / pr_pass / pr_fail actions
(pr_pass -> awaiting_pm_review, pr_fail -> needs_revision, mirroring the QA gate).
- Reviewer verbs claim_gate_review / pr_pass / pr_fail, and a main-PM submit_root
verb (the root analogue of the cell PM's submit_up; opens the root->master PR).
- Extend the self-review-symmetry validator to the new sign-off actions.
- Mirror the value into the ORM TaskStatus enum + the A2A state map, and add the
postgres taskstatus enum value (migration 040, forward-only like 037).
- Regenerate the per-role verb tables; add gate spec tests.
Spec surface only; the gateway methods + dispatch are wired in follow-ups, so the
verbs are advertised but dormant (flow_server tolerates unregistered verbs).
* feat(identity): add the three cell PR-review-gate reviewers
The in-path gate needs a reviewer per cell so each cell's assembled cell->root
PR is reviewed by a stack-specialized agent, while pr-reviewer-1 serves the
root->master gate (and keeps doing inbound external PRs).
- be/fe/ux-pr-reviewer: PR_REVIEWER role, team-scoped (so dispatch routes each
cell's gate to its own reviewer); seeded identities + ROLE_TEAM_RULES + names.
AI agent count 22 -> 25.
- They reuse the existing roboco-agent-pr-reviewer image (AGENT_IMAGES maps the
three slugs to it, as be-dev-1/-2 share one image) — no new image.
- Tracing table: pr_pass/pr_fail require a learning entry (parity with
post_pr_review), submit_root mirrors submit_up, claim_gate_review is waived
(its tracing applies on pr_pass/pr_fail) — completes the verb surface added
in the prior commit.
- Update the roster-pinning identity tests.
* feat(gateway): wire the in-path PR-review gate end to end
Make the assembled-PR review gate operational across the choreographer, the
TaskService transitions, and the v1 flow surface.
- TaskService: submit_for_review (in_progress→awaiting_pr_review), pr_gate_claim
(no-transition reviewer claim), pr_pass (→awaiting_pm_review), pr_fail
(→needs_revision); mirror qa_pass/qa_fail (clear claim, actor-mismatch warn,
issues appended for the PM's revision). VerbRunner gains the matching atomic
handlers + a create_root_pr side effect.
- Repoint submit_up to compose submit_for_review (cell→root PR enters the gate),
and add a main-PM submit_root verb (opens the root→master PR, enters the gate).
- Split main_pm_complete: a code root must pass the gate first (requires
awaiting_pm_review; rejects an in_progress code root toward submit_root and no
longer reopens the PR), while a branchless coordination root still walks
straight through, ungated.
- PRGateMixin (claim_gate_review / pr_pass / pr_fail) composed onto the
Choreographer; flow_server forwarders + v1 routes (pr_reviewer + main_pm) +
request schemas.
- Tests: gate spec + the updated submit_up / main_pm_complete expectations + new
real-DB integration tests driving submit_for_review→pr_gate_claim→pr_pass and
pr_fail through the real enforcement layer.
* feat(orchestrator): dispatch the in-path PR-review gate
Make the gate live in the dispatch loop.
- _dispatch_pr_gate_work: route awaiting_pr_review tasks to reviewers by level —
a cell→root task to its cell reviewer (be/fe/ux-pr-reviewer), the root→master
task to pr-reviewer-1. The reviewer self-claims via claim_gate_review (no
pre-claim, mirroring the external-PR dispatcher); registered in
_dispatch_all_work. _select_agent_for_cell learns the pr_reviewer role.
- _build_pr_gate_prompt: anchors the reviewer to the parent objective + full
acceptance criteria + the FE<->BE contract, then pr_pass / pr_fail.
- _readiness_check_role_for_status: awaiting_pr_review -> pr_reviewer.
- Fail routing: pr_fail reassigns the failed assembled task to its PM
(_revision_pm_for_task: cell PM for a cell team, Main PM for the root), and the
revision dispatcher is generalized from coordination-roots-only to any
PM-owned needs_revision task so the gate-failed task is re-coordinated instead
of deadlocking.
* docs: document the in-path PR-review gate + the cell reviewers (22→25)
Reflect the shipped gate across the canonical + RAG docs.
- CLAUDE.md: agent count 22→25, the cell reviewers in the org chart, an
awaiting_pr_review state + the gate transitions + a gate note in the lifecycle
section, and submit_root / claim_gate_review / pr_pass / pr_fail in the verb
surface table.
- docs/rag/architecture: org-structure (count, cell-reviewer roster, cells
table), agent-uuids (be/fe/ux-pr-reviewer rows), agent-model (role + team
rows).
- docs/rag/roles/pr-reviewer: the in-path gate section + the gate verbs.
- Wrap reviewer.id with UUID(str(...)) in the gate DB tests for mypy.
* docs: finish the gate doc sweep across README + RAG + generated artifacts
Catch the remaining surfaces beyond the canonical docs.
- README + how-to: agent count 22→25, the 6-agent cells (+ PR Reviewer), the
main reviewer's root→master gate role.
- RAG: permissions + tool-permissions + task-tools list the gate verbs
(claim_gate_review / pr_pass / pr_fail) for pr_reviewer; regenerate the
lifecycle artifacts (intent-verbs, status-transitions, the per-role
lifecycle-*.md prompts, panel lifecycle.json) from the spec via
build_lifecycle_artifacts.py so they carry the new status + verbs.
* fix(migration): shorten the 040 revision id to fit alembic_version VARCHAR(32)
The revision id '040_taskstatus_awaiting_pr_review' is 33 chars; alembic's
alembic_version.version_num column is VARCHAR(32), so recording the migration on
a real 'alembic upgrade head' failed with 'value too long for type character
varying(32)' (surfaced on the NAS deploy). The test suite missed it: the test DB
is built via Base.metadata.create_all and the parity test only renders SQL
offline, so nothing actually applied the migration chain.
- Rename to '040_awaiting_pr_review' (22 chars).
- Add a guard test asserting every revision id fits the VARCHAR(32) column.
- Verified by applying the full chain 001->040 against real Postgres: it now
reaches head and records '040_awaiting_pr_review' without truncation.
* fix(migration): land the actual 040 revision-id shortening + guard test
The prior commit captured only the file rename (git add aborted on the deleted
old path), leaving the long revision id and missing the guard test. This commit
carries the real content: revision id '040_awaiting_pr_review' (22 chars) and the
revision-id length guard. Re-verified against real Postgres — the full chain
reaches head and records the short id without truncation.
* fix(product): flush cell deletes before inserts when re-mapping projects
Editing a product's cell->project map (PATCH /api/products/{id}) 409'd with
'duplicate key value violates unique constraint uq_product_projects_product_team'
whenever a team already had a mapping. _replace_cells clears the old rows and
appends the new ones, but within a single flush SQLAlchemy orders INSERTs before
DELETEs for the same table, so the new (product_id, team) rows collided with the
not-yet-deleted old ones. Flush the deletes first.
Pre-existing bug (unrelated to the PR-review gate); surfaced on the NAS. New
real-Postgres regression test re-maps all three cells to different projects —
it fails with the unique violation without the fix and passes with it. The
existing update test only changed WHICH team was mapped, so it never collided.
* fix(gateway): let main_pm submit_root past the shared submit-up guard
submit_root reused the cell PM's _submit_up_ownership_guard, which
hardcoded agent.role != cell_pm and rejected the Main PM with
"submit_up is reserved for cell_pm". A branch-bearing code root could
then never close: submit_root bounced to complete, while complete
required awaiting_pm_review (reachable only via submit_root) and bounced
back — a circular rejection.
Both callers already run the spec gate (can_invoke_intent), which
enforces submit_up→cell_pm and submit_root→main_pm, so the guard's role
re-check was redundant for submit_up and wrong for submit_root. Broaden
it to accept either PM role as a defense-in-depth non-PM reject.
Adds the first choreographer-level submit_root test (the gap that let
this ship).
* fix(gateway): proactively steer both PMs to their bubble-up verb
The submit_root deadlock had a sibling steering gap: nothing told a PM
which verb opens the gate. The delegate next-hint said only 'i_am_idle
when done', and complete's in_progress rejection named submit_root for
the Main PM but left the Cell PM with a bare 'not ready for completion'
— no submit_up pointer, the same guess-the-verb trap.
- delegate hint now names the role-correct verb (root → submit_root,
cell parent → submit_up) proactively, before any rejection.
- cell_pm_complete's in_progress rejection now steers to submit_up,
mirroring the Main PM's submit_root gate hint.
Tests cover both the cell-PM steer and the role-aware delegate hint.
* docs: correct who-merges-which-PR across the gate docs + complete description
Audit of the gate docs found the merge actors mis-stated in several
places — the exact ambiguity that risks 'the reviewer/PM merges the root
PR' confusion:
- complete IntentSpec description said 'Main PM merges root PR' — false;
main_pm_complete escalates and the CEO merges root→master. Corrected
(propagated to intent-verbs.md, lifecycle.json, generated role prompts
via build_lifecycle_artifacts.py).
- task-tools.md: submit_up target was awaiting_pm_review (should be
awaiting_pr_review); Main PM flow had no submit_root — added it.
- README.md: lifecycle diagram now shows the awaiting_pr_review gate.
- cell-pm.md / main-pm.md: dropped the stale 'submit_up hands work to the
Main PM who merges your cell branch' model — the cell PM merges its own
gated cell→root PR; the Main PM owns the root + submit_root; the CEO
merges master. Added submit_root to the main-pm manifest.
- git-commits.md, pr-creation.md, tool-permissions.md, git-tools.md:
stopped attributing root→master PR opening to complete (it's submit_root).
No behavior change; verb wiring + state machine verified gap-free this
session (the pr_fail→needs_revision→PM respawn loop closes correctly).
* fix(orchestrator): stop closure respawn waiting the reaper window
A PM that finished its subtasks and idled left its parent 'paused' with a
fresh last_heartbeat_at. _is_recently_paused gated closure respawn on
_claim_heartbeat_ttl — the REAPER window (stale_claim_reap_seconds: 600s
default, 1800s on the NAS) — so the parent sat untouched for up to 10-30
minutes before its PM was respawned to close it. The whole chain stalled
behind it.
The race that guard actually protects against (i_am_idle auto-pauses, then
the agent is marked IDLE + its container tears down) is seconds, and the
live-session case is already covered by _is_agent_active. Introduce a
dedicated short debounce (pm_closure_recently_paused_seconds, default 45s)
and gate closure on that instead.
The existing test fixture masked this by setting _claim_heartbeat_ttl to
claim_stale_seconds (180s), not the production reaper value. Fixture now
mirrors production; adds a regression test that a parent paused past the
debounce but within the reaper window respawns immediately.
* feat(gate): post the in-path review verdict on the assembled PR
The in-path gate previously left no trace on the PR it gated — pr_pass /
pr_fail were pure status transitions. Now each verdict is posted as a
GitHub review on the assembled PR itself (server-side, bot account), so
the decision is visible on the very PR the PM merges.
- pr_pass → APPROVE, pr_fail → REQUEST_CHANGES on a cell→root PR.
- The root→master PR ALWAYS gets a plain COMMENT, never APPROVE/REQUEST_
CHANGES: only the CEO acts on master, so the gate must never leave an
approval that could satisfy branch protection (letting someone else
merge) nor a blocking review that could impede the CEO's merge.
- Best-effort and AFTER the DB transition — a GitHub failure is logged,
never rolls back the gate decision. Reuses git.post_pr_review's existing
self-review→COMMENT downgrade for the org's own PRs.
Adds _project_slug_for to the ChoreographerHelpers protocol (mypy) and a
unit suite covering event selection, the master-bound COMMENT rule, the
no-PR skip, and failure-swallowing. Docs updated (pr-reviewer, task-tools).
---------
Co-authored-by: Renn F <rennf93@users.noreply.github.com>
|
||
|
Renn F
|
32b6b31dd6 |
fix(gateway): PR base/target is the parent task's branch, not derived
submit_up opened the cell->root PR with a base computed by merge_chain.parent_branch_for, which drops the last --segment but REUSES the child's team prefix. Across a team boundary (cell feature/backend/ROOT--CELL -> root feature/main_pm/ROOT) that yields a ref that does not exist on the remote, so GitHub rejects the PR with 422 base: invalid and the cell parent wedges. Resolve the base/target from the parent task's authoritative branch_name (what branch creation already cuts each child from), via a shared VerbRunner._parent_branch_for helper used by _do_create_pr and _do_pr_merge. Falls back to parent_branch_for only when there is no parent (root->master -> master) or it has no branch yet. The leaf->cell path is unchanged (same team). Latent since the merge chain landed; first run to reach cell-PM bubble-up exposed it after #180. |
||
|
Renn F
|
c78395f9fc |
fix(gateway): submit_up opens cell PR before the pm-review transition
submit_up composed submit_pm_review (atomic) then create_pr (side
effect), but VerbRunner.run_intent runs all composes before any side
effect. submit_pm_review rejects without a PR (returns None), then
create_pr deref'd the None task -> 'NoneType has no attribute
branch_name', wedging cell-PM bubble-up in a respawn loop.
Add IntentSpec.pre_side_effects, run before composes. submit_up now
opens the cell->root PR first (persisting pr_number), so submit_pm_review
re-fetches and passes its pr_created gate. Mirrors the dev open_pr ->
i_am_done split. Latent since the lifecycle spec (
|
||
|
|
207aaecd72 |
Feature: lifecycle canonical spec (#14)
* chore: clean make quality baseline on feature/lifecycle-canonical-spec
Three classes of pre-existing issues blocking `make quality`:
1. Alembic migrations 002/009/011 used runtime introspection
(op.get_bind() + inspect / bind.execute) without guarding for
offline (--sql) mode. `alembic upgrade head --sql` is part of
`make quality`; in offline mode `op.get_bind()` returns a
MockConnection with no inspection system, so the migrations
crashed before emitting their SQL stubs. Each migration now
short-circuits or simplifies in `context.is_offline_mode()` —
live-DB behavior is unchanged.
2. ruff format drift on three files left over from prior in-flight
edits (choreographer/_impl.py, content_actions.py, and one test
file). `ruff format` applied.
3. vulture flagged two unused `tb` parameters in async __aexit__
stubs in test_task_service_lifecycle_misc.py. The parameter is
protocol-required but unused by the body — renamed to `_tb`
(vulture treats underscore-prefixed names as intentionally unused).
`make quality` is now green from this branch's HEAD; subsequent
lifecycle-spec work can use it as the per-task gate.
* feat(lifecycle): canonical spec package + Role/Status/TaskType enums
Foundation for the canonical lifecycle/permissions module. Enums
mirror docs/internal/old/workflows/STATUS_TRANSITIONS.md +
PERMISSIONS.md. Tests pin enum membership against both the
predecessor canon and roboco.models.base.TaskType.
* feat(lifecycle): Decision dataclass with allow/reject/tracing_gap constructors
Single rejection shape every consumer maps to its native format
(Envelope, HTTP code, prompt hint). __post_init__ enforces the
allowed/rejection_kind invariants so a malformed Decision can't reach
a consumer.
* fix(lifecycle): tighten Decision invariants per Task 2 review
Two reviewer findings on the Task 2 Decision dataclass, addressed
in one commit:
1. The docstring promised `allowed=True ⇒ rejection_kind is None
AND missing == [] AND remediate is None`, but __post_init__ only
checked the rejection_kind half. A caller could construct an
allow-shaped Decision with stale missing/remediate fields and
sneak it past validation. Tighten __post_init__ to enforce the
full invariant. Add a regression test.
2. tracing_gap defensively copies the missing list (`list(missing)`)
to isolate the stored list from later caller-side mutation, but
no test pinned this. Add a regression test that mutates the source
list after construction and asserts the stored list is unchanged.
Issue 2 from the same review (mutable list vs tuple for `missing`)
is a broader design call deferred until consumers exist; the
defensive copy is sufficient until then.
* feat(lifecycle): Precondition/ActionSpec/IntentSpec/StatusTransition dataclasses
The four dataclasses that hold the canonical tables. ActionSpec and
StatusTransition are direct ports of pre-gateway PERMISSIONS.md +
STATUS_TRANSITIONS.md rows. IntentSpec is the gateway-only addition:
each gateway intent verb declares which atomic actions it composes.
* feat(lifecycle): _STATUS_TRANSITIONS table + STATUS_GRAPH view
Direct port of STATUS_TRANSITIONS.md. Every transition records its
trigger action and (optionally) a role constraint. STATUS_GRAPH is
the precomputed source→{targets} view callers use for reachability
checks.
* fix(lifecycle): pin role_constraint values + clarify Task-5 handoff
Two reviewer findings on Task 4 _STATUS_TRANSITIONS, addressed in
one commit:
1. The original Task-4 tests verified (source, target) pairs but
not role_constraint contents. A typo in a single role name (e.g.
forgetting MAIN_PM from escalate_to_ceo) would have slipped past
them silently. Add test_status_transitions_role_constraints_match_canon
pinning every non-None constraint and the cancel-block invariant.
2. role_constraint=None on the `claim` rows from PENDING and
NEEDS_REVISION was load-bearing — it is the explicit handoff
point between the StatusTransition table (state machine layer)
and CLAIM_RULES (per-role claim authority, lands in Task 5).
The original inline comment said this in passing; expand it so
the design choice is unmissable for a stranger reading just
spec.py.
* feat(lifecycle): _ATOMIC_ACTIONS + CLAIM_RULES + ROLE_TEAM_RULES tables
Direct port of PERMISSIONS.md. Every task management tool gets an
ActionSpec with allowed_roles, source_statuses, target_status,
self_review_block, and needs_team_match flags. CLAIM_RULES maps each
Role to the statuses they can claim from. ROLE_TEAM_RULES is the
per-slug team restriction.
* fix(lifecycle): tighten ActionSpec contracts per Task 5 review
Three reviewer findings on Task 5's _ATOMIC_ACTIONS table, addressed
in one commit:
1. set_plan.source_statuses widened to {CLAIMED, IN_PROGRESS} but
every existing caller (i_will_work_on / i_will_plan compositions)
runs set_plan while CLAIMED, between claim and start. Narrow to
{CLAIMED} only. If a future "edit plan mid-flight" feature lands,
widen explicitly with test coverage at that time.
2. needs_team_match was set True only on claim/qa_pass/qa_fail/
docs_complete. Defense-in-depth says every role-scoped task
action should re-assert team match (don't rely on the inheritance
chain through assigned_to alone). Flip to True on: start,
set_plan, block, pause, submit_verification, submit_qa,
submit_pm_review, complete, create_subtask. Leave False on
board/CEO actions and PM cross-cell interventions (unblock,
resume, cancel) where the cross-cell semantics are intentional.
3. claim.source_statuses is intentionally a SUPERSET of any single
role's CLAIM_RULES allowance (the table holds the union; CLAIM_RULES
holds the per-role authority). Add an inline comment above the
claim ActionSpec so a future reader doesn't conclude the two
tables disagree — they don't, they encode overlapping facts at
different grains.
* feat(lifecycle): _INTENT_VERBS table — every gateway verb declared
Each gateway intent verb is now a named composition of atomic actions
plus optional side effects. i_will_work_on = (claim, set_plan, start);
i_am_done = (submit_verification, submit_qa); open_pr is pure side
effects (push_branch, create_pr); etc.
* fix(lifecycle): widen block.allowed_roles to include QA + Documenter
Task 6 review caught a role-set inconsistency: i_am_blocked.allowed_roles
admits dev/QA/doc, but the underlying block.allowed_roles only allowed
dev+PM. Result: a QA or documenter calling i_am_blocked would pass the
IntentSpec gate and then be rejected by the composed ActionSpec gate
when Task 7 wires can_invoke_intent.
Widen block to include QA + Documenter. The semantic case is sound: a
QA reviewing a task can discover an external blocker; a documenter
writing docs may need PM intervention. Predecessor PERMISSIONS.md
restricted block to dev+PM, but with the gateway exposing i_am_blocked
to all worker roles, the underlying atomic must agree.
The deeper unclaim/escalate_up "imperative verb" concern from the same
review (composes=() but mutates state) is deferred to Task 8 where the
validator design lands.
* feat(lifecycle): public lookup functions + Context + preconditions
can_claim, can_invoke_action, can_invoke_intent, valid_next_verbs,
composed_actions_for, intents_for_role, status_after — the entire
public surface every consumer will use. Context carries the
caller-supplied state preconditions need (plan, journal-decision
flag, etc.). Preconditions for plan/commits/no_pr/ownership are
declared once and wired into the relevant IntentSpecs.
* fix(lifecycle): wire PRECONDITION_OWNERSHIP through Context.actor_id
Task 7 review found _p_owns_task reads agent.id but every call site
passes None for the agent arg. Result: getattr(None, "id", object())
returns a fresh sentinel, task.assigned_to == <sentinel> is always
False, and open_pr / i_am_done would reject every owner the moment
Task 9 wires consumers.
Fix: thread identity through Context.actor_id (new UUID field) and
rewrite _p_owns_task to read from the context. Both call sites already
pass the Context — no signature changes elsewhere. Add green-path
test exercising the owner-can-open-pr case the existing tests
missed (the Task 7 plan only tested precondition-failure paths,
which masked the bug).
Plus surface hygiene: STATUS_GRAPH, CLAIM_RULES, ROLE_TEAM_RULES,
and the four PRECONDITION_* constants are now in
roboco.lifecycle.__init__.__all__ so consumers in Tasks 8/9 don't
depend on the implicit `from roboco.lifecycle.spec import ...`
backdoor.
* feat(lifecycle): import-time self-consistency validators
10 validators run at module import; first failure raises
LifecycleSpecError and prevents the package from loading. Covers
status enum coverage, reachability, terminal exits, intent
compositions, status chain consistency, claim-rule role/status
coverage, self-review symmetry, team-rule slug existence, and
StatusTransition action references.
* fix(lifecycle): close validator gaps; resolve BACKLOG-claim and submit_qa IN_PROGRESS-shortcut ambiguity
Three reviewer follow-ups on Task 8's _validate.py, plus two real
data corrections the new action-target-reachability validator
surfaced.
1. Design spec §9 calls for "every ActionSpec.target_status, when
set, is reachable from each source_status via STATUS_GRAPH" —
missing from Task 8's 10 validators. Add
_check_action_target_reachable_from_source.
2. _check_role_team_rules_slugs verified slug existence in
AGENT_UUIDS but NOT that the cell team in ROLE_TEAM_RULES
matches the seed. Add _check_role_team_rules_team_match,
scoped to non-None entries only — None means "exempt from
team-match enforcement" (cross-cell roles), not "no team in
org chart".
3. test_validators_pass_on_real_spec was ceremonial. Add
test_run_all_validators_raises_on_unknown_intent_action,
a deliberate-break regression that monkeypatches _INTENT_VERBS
to inject a fake action and asserts LifecycleSpecError raises.
The new action-target-reachability validator caught two real
data inconsistencies between the predecessor canon docs and the
spec tables:
A. claim.source_statuses listed BACKLOG and CLAIM_RULES[*PM]
listed BACKLOG, but STATUS_GRAPH[BACKLOG] = {PENDING, CANCELLED}
only. Resolution: PMs use the explicit \`activate\` action to
move BACKLOG → PENDING, then claim from PENDING. Drop BACKLOG
from claim.source_statuses and CLAIM_RULES.
B. submit_qa.source_statuses listed IN_PROGRESS, but
STATUS_GRAPH[IN_PROGRESS] does NOT include AWAITING_QA. The
intent verb i_am_done composes (submit_verification, submit_qa)
which forces IN_PROGRESS → VERIFYING → AWAITING_QA — no
shortcut. Drop the stale IN_PROGRESS entry from
submit_qa.source_statuses.
Both corrections tighten the canonical state machine to a strict
no-skip transition graph. Pre-gateway PERMISSIONS.md/STATUS_TRANSITIONS.md
disagreements are resolved here; spec.py is the canon now.
* feat(gateway): Envelope.from_decision maps lifecycle Decisions to envelopes
Single shape adapter so verb bodies stop hand-composing rejection
envelopes. Each rejection_kind maps to a specific envelope flavor;
'self_review' folds into 'not_authorized' with a parenthetical hint;
constructing from an allow Decision raises (programmer error).
* feat(gateway): VerbRunner for atomic composed-action dispatch
Wraps spec.composed_actions_for(intent) in session.begin_nested()
so mid-sequence failures roll the DB back. Side effects run AFTER
the savepoint commits. Each atomic action name dispatches to a
TaskService method via a single, exhaustive _dispatch_atomic
mapping. New verbs slot in by adding an IntentSpec entry + a
_dispatch_atomic case if a new atomic is needed.
* refactor(gateway): i_will_work_on uses spec.can_invoke_intent + VerbRunner
Replace the bespoke status-branch dispatcher in i_will_work_on with the
spec-driven flow: load task -> load agent -> build spec.Context ->
spec.can_invoke_intent (and spec.can_claim for per-role status authority)
-> Envelope.from_decision on rejection -> VerbRunner.run_intent on success.
The _i_will_work_on_pending, _i_will_work_on_claimed,
_i_will_work_on_needs_revision, and _start_failed_envelope helpers are
removed; the runner replaces them. Two narrow verb-body re-entry blocks
remain for behaviors the spec does not yet model:
1. in_progress + same agent -> idempotent heartbeat-only return
2. claimed + same agent -> _resume_from_claimed (set_plan + start)
to recover from a stuck mid-claim crash without re-running claim
against a state the spec excludes.
The behavioral claim guards (already_active / paused / sibling_sequence)
also stay imperative for now -- they're not in the spec yet and migrate
into spec.extra_preconditions in a later task. Per-role claim authority
is enforced via spec.can_claim because the atomic claim action's
source_statuses are the union across roles; CLAIM_RULES narrows.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py runs the verb
against every (role x status x task_type='code') combo (112 rows) and
asserts the envelope error matches the spec's Decision (or can_claim's
Decision when the intent gate passes but per-role claim authority does
not). This is the contract that makes spec/verb drift impossible.
Existing tests updated where rejection-message text changed (the spec
now produces the messages, e.g. "role 'cell_pm' may not call
'i_will_work_on'" instead of "PM cannot execute code") or where the
spec's stricter view ("invalid_state" -> "not_authorized" for a dev
trying to claim awaiting_qa) is more accurate. Test fixtures were
updated to wire task.session.begin_nested as a proper async context
manager (required by VerbRunner) and to set agent_for().id so runner-
driven calls line up with assert_awaited_with(task_id, agent_id).
* refactor(lifecycle): push CLAIM_RULES enforcement into can_invoke_action
Task 11's i_will_work_on migration had to call spec.can_claim()
separately after spec.can_invoke_intent() because the claim action's
source_statuses is the union across all claim-eligible roles —
can_invoke_intent alone would let a developer pass for claiming
awaiting_qa (a QA-only state).
The retrofit pattern would repeat in every claim-composing verb
(i_will_plan, claim_review, claim_doc_task). Push the per-role
narrowing inside can_invoke_action when the action is "claim",
using the same not_authorized vs invalid_state disambiguation
can_claim already implemented (status-reserved-for-another-role
returns not_authorized; status-no-role-can-claim returns
invalid_state). Extracted the body to _check_claim_rules_narrow
to keep can_invoke_action under xenon's complexity threshold.
Update _i_will_work_on_gate to drop the redundant spec.can_claim
call. Update test_consumer_parity.py to assert only against
can_invoke_intent's Decision.
Tasks 12-22 will inherit the cleaner pattern: spec.can_invoke_intent
is the single gate; verb bodies don't need per-action retrofits.
* refactor(gateway): i_will_plan uses spec.can_invoke_intent + VerbRunner
Migrates i_will_plan to the spec-driven pattern Task 11 set up for
i_will_work_on. The verb body now: (1) loads task + agent, (2) builds
Context, (3) checks idempotent/recovery re-entry, (4) calls
spec.can_invoke_intent, (5) returns Envelope.from_decision on
rejection, (6) delegates composition to VerbRunner. The
_i_will_plan_* helpers are removed — the runner replaces them.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py runs the verb
against every (role × status × task_type) combo and asserts the
envelope matches spec.Decision.
* refactor(gateway): delegate uses spec.can_invoke_intent for role/state gate
Migrates delegate to the spec-driven role/state gate. The chain
validation (main_pm->cell_pm, cell_pm->its team's devs), the
assignee-vs-task_type rule (Cell PMs receive planning-typed only),
the enum coercion, and the parent-lifecycle/cap guards STAY in the
verb body — they encode delegate-specific semantics the spec
doesn't model.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py asserts the
spec's role+state rejection is correctly surfaced. Chain/assignee
rejections continue to be tested in test_choreographer_pm_extras.
* refactor(gateway): open_pr uses spec.can_invoke_intent + VerbRunner
Migrates open_pr to spec-driven gating. The spec's
extra_preconditions (PRECONDITION_OWNERSHIP, PRECONDITION_COMMITS,
PRECONDITION_NO_PR) handle all three precondition checks; the verb
body delegates side-effect dispatch (push_branch, create_pr) to
VerbRunner.
Idempotent re-entry retained: an open_pr call against a task that
already has a PR (and the caller owns it) returns OK without
re-opening, rather than the tracing_gap the spec would otherwise
produce. This preserves agent ergonomics — two calls in a row
shouldn't surface a misleading "no_prior_pr" hint.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py runs the verb
against representative (status x commits x pr_number) combos and
asserts the envelope matches spec.Decision.
* refactor(gateway): i_am_done uses spec.can_invoke_intent + VerbRunner
Migrates i_am_done to spec-driven gating. The spec's
extra_preconditions (PRECONDITION_OWNERSHIP, PRECONDITION_COMMITS)
handle ownership and commit-count checks; VerbRunner dispatches
the (submit_verification, submit_qa) atomic chain.
The tracing-gate preconditions (progress entry, journal:reflect,
acceptance criteria) and the field-level submit-qa gates stay in
the verb body — they model gates the spec doesn't yet cover.
Defense-in-depth: those gates run after the spec accepts the
ownership/commits checks.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py runs the
verb against (role × status × ownership × commits) and asserts
the envelope matches spec.Decision.
* refactor(gateway): i_am_blocked uses spec.can_invoke_intent + VerbRunner
Migrates i_am_blocked to spec-driven gating. The journal:struggle
write stays in the verb body (it's a side effect outside the
lifecycle action). VerbRunner dispatches the `block` atomic action
via task_service.escalate.
Parity test in tests/lifecycle/test_consumer_parity.py.
* refactor(gateway): unclaim and resume use spec.can_invoke_intent
Migrates both verbs to the spec-driven gate. unclaim's verb body
keeps its dispatch (task.unclaim_for_agent) because composes=();
resume goes through VerbRunner with composes=("resume",).
The reassignment-rejection branch (introduced in
|