docs(prompts): D1 fixup — role-correct circuit-breaker escalation paths

QA / Documenter / Board don't have i_am_blocked in their manifests. The
D1 snippet's "escalate via i_am_blocked" line is now role-correct:
- QA / Documenter: unclaim(task_id) + dm(cell-pm, ...) with rejection
- Board: dm(ceo, ...) for PO/HoM; Auditor uses note(scope='reflect', ...)

agents/prompts/roles/board.md

@@ -102,5 +102,7 @@ immediately. The breaker tracks repeated rejections of the same verb
 Read the `remediate` field — it names what was missing across the last
 N rejections. Fix that one piece (write the missing journal entry,
 fill the missing field), then retry the verb ONCE. If the breaker fires
-again, escalate via `i_am_blocked` with the rejection details — that
-signal indicates a real wedge, not a transient error.
+again, you don't have an `i_am_blocked` verb — `dm(recipient='ceo', text=...)`
+with the rejection details (PO/HoM only; Auditor uses `note(scope='reflect', text=...)`)
+so the wedge is captured. The signal indicates a real wedge, not a transient
+error.

agents/prompts/roles/documenter.md

@@ -100,5 +100,7 @@ immediately. The breaker tracks repeated rejections of the same verb
 Read the `remediate` field — it names what was missing across the last
 N rejections. Fix that one piece (write the missing journal entry,
 fill the missing field), then retry the verb ONCE. If the breaker fires
-again, escalate via `i_am_blocked` with the rejection details — that
-signal indicates a real wedge, not a transient error.
+again, you don't have an `i_am_blocked` verb — `unclaim(task_id)` to
+release the claim back to pending and `dm(recipient='<cell-pm>', text=...)`
+with the rejection details so the PM knows it's a real wedge, not a
+transient error.

agents/prompts/roles/qa.md

@@ -102,5 +102,7 @@ immediately. The breaker tracks repeated rejections of the same verb
 Read the `remediate` field — it names what was missing across the last
 N rejections. Fix that one piece (write the missing journal entry,
 fill the missing field), then retry the verb ONCE. If the breaker fires
-again, escalate via `i_am_blocked` with the rejection details — that
-signal indicates a real wedge, not a transient error.
+again, you don't have an `i_am_blocked` verb — `unclaim(task_id)` to
+release the claim back to pending and `dm(recipient='<cell-pm>', text=...)`
+with the rejection details so the PM knows it's a real wedge, not a
+transient error.