feat(conventions): modularity checks + scan-derived, language-aware rules

The standard was architectural LINTING (placement + hygiene) — things ruff/eslint already do — and it forced backend rules onto frontend projects. This makes it enforce MODULARIZATION, the separation-of-concerns a senior demands that linters are blind to:

- modular_cohesion: a file that mixes architectural concerns (a model defined in a router, a schema in a component) is a monolith — split it. One concern per file.
- thin_routes (Python): a route handler that runs its own DB access instead of delegating to a service.
- thin_components (TypeScript/React): a component that fetches data in its body instead of using a hook.
- god_class: a class past a method-count threshold (single responsibility).

The checks inspect a definition's BODY and a file's COMPOSITION via tree-sitter, precision-over-recall (fire only on a confident structural signal). Rules are now scan-derived and language-aware: hygiene seeds universally, placement only for modules that exist, and modularity per stack — so a frontend project carries no_models_in_components + thin_components, never a backend no_models_in_routers. BUILTIN_RULES is reduced to language-agnostic hygiene.

tests/unit/foundation/policy/conventions/test_effective_map.py

@@ -14,8 +14,10 @@ from roboco.foundation.policy.conventions.models import (
 
 def test_effective_map_applies_builtin_rules_when_file_absent() -> None:
     eff = effective_map(ConventionsStandard(), None)
-    assert eff.rules["no_models_in_routers"].level == "block"
+    assert eff.rules["no_lint_suppressions"].level == "block"
     assert eff.rules["no_inline_comments"].level == "warn"
+    # Placement / modularity rules are derived per project, not universal.
+    assert "no_models_in_routers" not in eff.rules
 
 
 def test_file_module_overrides_derived_by_path() -> None: