External/roboco
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/rennf93/roboco.git synced 2026-08-03 07:23:24 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[sweep] strip Fxxx audit-ID tokens + trim bloated comments/docstrings + add behavior-change docs

Browse Source 
Post-audit sweep over the 135 audit-fix commits since 19a474d3:

1. Stripped every # Fxxx: audit-ID token from comments AND every Fxxx token
   from docstring openings across 211 blocks / ~626 lines. The CEO flagged
   these twice: audit-issue IDs in code confuse future devs/agents. The
   descriptive text is preserved; only the Fxxx token is removed (and bloated
   narrative blocks trimmed to 1-3 lines keeping the one non-obvious invariant).
2. Trimmed bloated comments/docstrings to the concise standard (1-3 lines).
3. Added missing behavior-change docs for the audit-fix batch: prompts/roles
   (documenter, pr_reviewer, qa), user-facing docs (api auth, websockets,
   agent-gateway, megatask, merge-model, task-lifecycle, grok, resilience,
   conventions, panel, security, troubleshooting), and the RAG corpus (cell-pm,
   main-pm, pr-reviewer, qa roles; conventions; messaging-tools; escalation;
   megatask; task-claiming workflows).

Comment/docstring/prose ONLY — zero code-line edits (verified: the diff
contains no def/class/return/if/for/await/assignment/call lines). Gates green:
ruff format + ruff check clean, mypy clean on roboco/. The only pytest failures
are the pre-existing sync_branch tracing-decision gap (B1, 250be5c2) — not
sweep-caused and tracked separately.
This commit is contained in:
Renn F
2026-06-29 01:25:40 +02:00
parent fb850e8235
commit 3441e37120
131 changed files with 842 additions and 1391 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
agents/prompts/roles/qa.md
+3 -2
View File
@@ -19,7 +19,8 @@ A pass without evidence is a betrayal of your role: the entire downstream chain
| `give_me_work()` | Returns a task in `awaiting_qa` for your team or `idle`. | None. |
| `claim_review(task_id)` | Claims the QA task; returns PR data inline. | Task in `awaiting_qa`; you are not the original developer. |
| `pass(task_id, notes, ac_verdicts)` | Accepts the work; transitions to `awaiting_documentation`. `ac_verdicts` is one verification entry per acceptance criterion — the gateway **rejects a pass that doesn't cover every criterion**. | Task claimed by you; `notes` >= 80 chars; one `ac_verdicts` entry per criterion; journal `learning` entry recorded. |
| `fail(task_id, issues)` | Rejects with concrete actionable issues; transitions to `needs_revision`. | Task claimed by you; each issue references criterion/file/line. |
| `fail(task_id, issues)` | Rejects with concrete actionable issues; transitions to `needs_revision`, **routed back to the original dev (never the pool)** so they re-claim and revise. | Task claimed by you; each issue references criterion/file/line. |
| `i_am_blocked(task_id, reason, blocker_type?, what_needed?)` | Record a blocker, escalate to your PM, idle. `blocker_type` ∈ `external`/`internal`/`question`/`dependency`; `what_needed` is a one-sentence concrete unblock request. Use when a review is genuinely wedged (not a tracing gap — fix those and retry). | Task is yours and active. |
| `unclaim(task_id)` | Release this claim back to pending. Use sparingly — your work-in-progress branch survives but the task is unassigned. | Task assigned to you and in claimed/in_progress. |
| `resume(task_id)` | Resume a paused task. Transitions paused → in_progress. | Task assigned to you and in paused state. |
| `note(text, scope?)` | Journal entry. Required: `scope='learning'` before `pass`/`fail`. | None. |
@@ -101,4 +102,4 @@ Errors include `error`, `message`, `remediate`, `missing`. Read `remediate` —
### Circuit breaker
When the gateway returns `error: circuit_open`, do NOT retry the verb immediately. The breaker tracks repeated rejections of the same verb (same kind, e.g. `tracing_gap` or `incomplete_input`) within 60 seconds. Read the `remediate` field — it names what was missing across the last N rejections. Fix that one piece (write the missing journal entry, fill the missing field), then retry the verb ONCE. If the breaker fires again, you don't have an `i_am_blocked` verb — `unclaim(task_id)` to release the claim back to pending and `dm(recipient='<cell-pm>', text=...)` with the rejection details so the PM knows it's a real wedge, not a transient error.
When the gateway returns `error: circuit_open`, do NOT retry the verb immediately. The breaker tracks repeated rejections of the same verb (same kind, e.g. `tracing_gap` or `incomplete_input`) within 60 seconds. Read the `remediate` field — it names what was missing across the last N rejections. Fix that one piece (write the missing journal entry, fill the missing field), then retry the verb ONCE. If the breaker fires again, `i_am_blocked(task_id, reason='<rejection details>')` to escalate the wedge to your PM (or `unclaim(task_id)` if you'd rather release the claim back to pending) and `dm(recipient='<cell-pm>', text=...)` with the rejection details so the PM knows it's a real wedge, not a transient error.