[e8daa1e6] Frontend: audit and close open blocker-severity findings (#727)

* [dae66a7f] docs(frontend): add 2026-07-29 blocker-findings audit report (#724)

Co-authored-by: Frontend Developer 1 <fe-dev-1@roboco.tech>

* [9a9cbb14] docs(frontend): fix 3 pr_gate findings on blocker-findings audit report (#729)

Add the audit doc to README's Available docs index, replace the
unsupported CLA-CI lifecycle citation with a plain no-evidence
statement, and add an auditable Triaged section naming the two
triage() calls and their approximate timestamps.

Co-authored-by: Frontend Developer 1 <fe-dev-1@roboco.tech>

* [e0f05e44] Sync branch onto master and fix audit-doc wording nit (#730)

* [e0f05e44] docs(frontend): fix present-tense wording in blocker-findings audit report

* [e0f05e44] docs(frontend): reflow hard-wrapped paragraphs in blocker-findings audit report

make reflow-check (part of make quality, the local equivalent of the
GitHub 'Python quality gate' job) was failing because several
paragraphs in docs/frontend/blocker-findings-audit-2026-07-29.md were
hard-wrapped across multiple lines instead of the repo's one-line-per-
paragraph markdown convention. Ran make reflow-docs to collapse each
paragraph to a single line; no prose content changed.

---------

Co-authored-by: Frontend Developer 1 <fe-dev-1@roboco.tech>

---------

Co-authored-by: roboco-app[bot] <302741806+roboco-app[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Frontend Developer 1 <fe-dev-1@roboco.tech>

docs/frontend/README.md

@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ Documentation for the Frontend Cell team.
 - [`hooks.md`](./hooks.md) — `usePageRefresh` and `PageRefreshProvider` usage and API reference
 - [`forms/forms-audit.md`](./forms/forms-audit.md) — the living panel-forms ↔ backend-schema consistency audit (settings page + project + task dialogs); update the matching row in the same PR as any schema change
 - [`forms/project-fields-audit.md`](./forms/project-fields-audit.md) — project dialog field reference (types, create-vs-edit exposure, the add-a-field checklist)
+- [`blocker-findings-audit-2026-07-29.md`](./blocker-findings-audit-2026-07-29.md) — 2026-07-29 audit of the frontend cell's `needs_revision`/`awaiting_pm_review` backlog for open BLOCKER-severity findings
 
 ## Contributing
 

docs/frontend/blocker-findings-audit-2026-07-29.md

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+# Frontend Blocker-Findings Audit — 2026-07-29
+
+## Outcome
+
+Sentinel flagged an org-wide backlog of open BLOCKER-severity findings sitting in the `task_review_findings` ledger. As part of the response, the frontend cell PM triaged the frontend cell's `needs_revision` / `awaiting_pm_review` backlog for tasks carrying an open BLOCKER-severity finding.
+
+**Result: 0 open BLOCKER-severity findings** were found on frontend tasks as of the 2026-07-29 triage pass. No frontend task sat in `needs_revision` or `awaiting_pm_review` at either checkpoint.
+
+## Triaged
+
+No individual frontend task IDs were enumerated in this pass — the audit ran via two aggregate `triage()` calls against the frontend cell's `needs_revision` / `awaiting_pm_review` backlog rather than per-task lookups:
+
+- **~16:51 UTC** (cold run) — `triage()` returned zero frontend tasks in `needs_revision` or `awaiting_pm_review` with an unresolved review outcome.
+- **~18:21 UTC** (re-run after clearing the notification/A2A inbox, to rule out stale items masking real backlog) — `triage()` returned the same zero-match result.
+
+Both results were cross-referenced against `recent_team_activity`, which showed no frontend task in `needs_revision` at either checkpoint. Because `triage()` returns an aggregate empty-set signal rather than a task list, no individual task IDs exist to enumerate beyond these two calls.
+
+## Assessment
+
+0 open blockers found on frontend tasks this pass, so this audit gives no direct evidence on whether `mark_addressed`/`mark_verified` is working — only that nothing is currently stuck.