mirror of
https://github.com/rennf93/roboco.git
synced 2026-08-03 07:23:24 +02:00
Initial implementation
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
|
||||
# QA Review: TASK-{ID}
|
||||
|
||||
> **Reviewer**: {qa agent-id}
|
||||
> **Date**: YYYY-MM-DD
|
||||
> **Verdict**: {PASSED / NEEDS_REVISION / BLOCKED}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Review Summary
|
||||
|
||||
| Aspect | Status | Notes |
|
||||
|--------|--------|-------|
|
||||
| Functionality | ✅ / ❌ | {notes} |
|
||||
| Code Quality | ✅ / ❌ | {notes} |
|
||||
| Tests | ✅ / ❌ | {notes} |
|
||||
| Security | ✅ / ❌ | {notes} |
|
||||
| Documentation | ✅ / ❌ | {notes} |
|
||||
|
||||
**Overall Verdict**: {PASSED / NEEDS_REVISION}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Acceptance Criteria Verification
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence |
|
||||
|---|-----------|--------|----------|
|
||||
| 1 | {criterion from task} | ✅ / ❌ | {how verified} |
|
||||
| 2 | {criterion from task} | ✅ / ❌ | {how verified} |
|
||||
| 3 | {criterion from task} | ✅ / ❌ | {how verified} |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Functionality Testing
|
||||
|
||||
### Happy Path
|
||||
| Test Case | Expected | Actual | Status |
|
||||
|-----------|----------|--------|--------|
|
||||
| {test case 1} | {expected} | {actual} | ✅ / ❌ |
|
||||
| {test case 2} | {expected} | {actual} | ✅ / ❌ |
|
||||
|
||||
### Edge Cases
|
||||
| Test Case | Expected | Actual | Status |
|
||||
|-----------|----------|--------|--------|
|
||||
| {edge case 1} | {expected} | {actual} | ✅ / ❌ |
|
||||
| {edge case 2} | {expected} | {actual} | ✅ / ❌ |
|
||||
|
||||
### Error Handling
|
||||
| Scenario | Expected | Actual | Status |
|
||||
|----------|----------|--------|--------|
|
||||
| {error scenario 1} | {expected} | {actual} | ✅ / ❌ |
|
||||
| {error scenario 2} | {expected} | {actual} | ✅ / ❌ |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Code Quality Review
|
||||
|
||||
### Code Review Checklist
|
||||
- [ ] Follows project conventions
|
||||
- [ ] No code duplication
|
||||
- [ ] Functions are focused (single responsibility)
|
||||
- [ ] Naming is clear and consistent
|
||||
- [ ] No dead code or commented-out code
|
||||
- [ ] Error handling is appropriate
|
||||
- [ ] Logging is adequate
|
||||
|
||||
### Type Safety
|
||||
- [ ] All types properly defined
|
||||
- [ ] No `any` types (TS) or missing hints (Python)
|
||||
- [ ] Null/undefined handled properly
|
||||
|
||||
### Observations
|
||||
{Any code quality observations}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Test Coverage
|
||||
|
||||
### Automated Tests
|
||||
| Category | Before | After | Delta |
|
||||
|----------|--------|-------|-------|
|
||||
| Unit Tests | X | X | +X |
|
||||
| Integration Tests | X | X | +X |
|
||||
| Coverage % | X% | X% | +X% |
|
||||
|
||||
### Test Quality
|
||||
- [ ] Tests cover happy path
|
||||
- [ ] Tests cover error cases
|
||||
- [ ] Tests are readable
|
||||
- [ ] Tests don't have false positives
|
||||
|
||||
### Test Output
|
||||
```
|
||||
{Paste test run output}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Security Review
|
||||
|
||||
### Checklist
|
||||
- [ ] Input validation present
|
||||
- [ ] No sensitive data exposed
|
||||
- [ ] Authentication/authorization correct
|
||||
- [ ] No injection vulnerabilities (SQL, command, etc.)
|
||||
- [ ] No XSS vulnerabilities
|
||||
- [ ] Secrets not hardcoded
|
||||
|
||||
### Findings
|
||||
{Any security observations}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Performance Review
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] No obvious performance issues
|
||||
- [ ] Database queries optimized
|
||||
- [ ] No N+1 query problems
|
||||
- [ ] Appropriate caching considered
|
||||
|
||||
### Observations
|
||||
{Any performance observations}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Issues Found
|
||||
|
||||
### Blocking Issues
|
||||
|
||||
#### Issue 1: {Title}
|
||||
**Severity**: {Critical / High}
|
||||
**Location**: `{file:line}`
|
||||
|
||||
**Description**: {What's wrong}
|
||||
|
||||
**Steps to Reproduce**:
|
||||
1. {Step 1}
|
||||
2. {Step 2}
|
||||
|
||||
**Expected**: {What should happen}
|
||||
**Actual**: {What happens}
|
||||
|
||||
**Suggested Fix**: {How to fix, if known}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
#### Issue 2: {Title}
|
||||
{Same format}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Non-Blocking Issues
|
||||
|
||||
#### Issue 3: {Title}
|
||||
**Severity**: {Medium / Low}
|
||||
**Location**: `{file:line}`
|
||||
|
||||
**Description**: {What's wrong}
|
||||
|
||||
**Suggestion**: {How to improve}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Positive Observations
|
||||
|
||||
{What was done well - positive feedback matters!}
|
||||
|
||||
- {Good thing 1}
|
||||
- {Good thing 2}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Suggestions for Future
|
||||
|
||||
{Non-blocking suggestions for improvement}
|
||||
|
||||
- {Suggestion 1}
|
||||
- {Suggestion 2}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Verdict Details
|
||||
|
||||
### If PASSED
|
||||
- All acceptance criteria met
|
||||
- No blocking issues
|
||||
- Code quality acceptable
|
||||
- Tests adequate
|
||||
- Ready for documentation
|
||||
|
||||
### If NEEDS_REVISION
|
||||
**Required changes before re-review**:
|
||||
1. {Required change 1}
|
||||
2. {Required change 2}
|
||||
|
||||
**Re-review scope**: {What will be re-checked}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Review Log
|
||||
|
||||
| Date | Action | Reviewer |
|
||||
|------|--------|----------|
|
||||
| YYYY-MM-DD | Initial review | {agent} |
|
||||
| YYYY-MM-DD | Re-review after fixes | {agent} |
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user