Files
roboco/usage.md
T

265 lines
8.9 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

2025-12-14 22:05:34 +01:00
# RoboCo Usage Guide
Operating the AI company after deployment.
## The Organization
22 AI agents organized as a company:
2025-12-14 22:05:34 +01:00
```
CEO (You)
2026-06-09 17:08:34 +02:00
├── Intake (on-demand interviewer: chats only with you to draft a task)
├── Secretary (your chief-of-staff: runs gated directives under your command)
2025-12-14 22:05:34 +01:00
└── Board
├── Product Owner
├── Head of Marketing
├── PR Reviewer (read-only: gates inbound external/fork PRs)
2025-12-14 22:05:34 +01:00
└── Auditor
└── Main PM
├── Backend Cell (PM, 2 Devs, QA, Documenter)
├── Frontend Cell (PM, 2 Devs, QA, Documenter)
└── UX/UI Cell (PM, 2 Devs, QA, Documenter)
2025-12-14 22:05:34 +01:00
```
## Agent IDs
| ID | Role | Team |
|----|------|------|
| `main-pm` | Main PM | Management |
| `be-pm` | Cell PM | Backend |
| `be-dev-1`, `be-dev-2` | Developers | Backend |
| `be-qa` | QA | Backend |
| `be-doc` | Documenter | Backend |
| `fe-pm` | Cell PM | Frontend |
| `fe-dev-1`, `fe-dev-2` | Developers | Frontend |
| `fe-qa` | QA | Frontend |
| `fe-doc` | Documenter | Frontend |
| `ux-pm` | Cell PM | UX/UI |
2025-12-28 03:04:41 +01:00
| `ux-dev-1`, `ux-dev-2` | Developers | UX/UI |
2025-12-14 22:05:34 +01:00
| `ux-qa` | QA | UX/UI |
| `ux-doc` | Documenter | UX/UI |
| `product-owner` | Product Owner | Board |
| `head-marketing` | Head of Marketing | Board |
| `auditor` | Auditor | Board |
2026-06-09 17:08:34 +02:00
| `intake-1` | Intake (interviewer) | Board |
| `secretary-1` | Secretary (chief-of-staff) | Board |
| `pr-reviewer-1` | PR Reviewer (read-only) | Board |
2025-12-14 22:05:34 +01:00
## Spawning Agents
```bash
# Start with minimal team
uv run python -m roboco.cli --spawn main-pm be-dev-1 be-qa
# Add more agents
uv run python -m roboco.cli --spawn main-pm be-pm be-dev-1 be-dev-2 be-qa
# Full organization
uv run python -m roboco.cli --spawn \
main-pm \
be-pm be-dev-1 be-dev-2 be-qa be-doc \
fe-pm fe-dev-1 fe-dev-2 fe-qa fe-doc \
2025-12-28 03:04:41 +01:00
ux-pm ux-dev-1 ux-dev-2 ux-qa ux-doc \
2025-12-14 22:05:34 +01:00
product-owner head-marketing auditor
```
## Monitoring Agents
### Check Status
```bash
# Via API
curl http://localhost:8000/api/orchestrator/status | jq
2025-12-14 22:05:34 +01:00
# Via Docker
docker ps --filter "name=roboco-agent"
```
### View Agent Logs
```bash
# Follow specific agent's output
docker logs -f roboco-agent-be-dev-1
# All agent containers
docker ps --filter "name=roboco-agent" --format "{{.Names}}"
```
### Container Management
```bash
# Stop one agent
docker stop roboco-agent-be-dev-1
# Restart an agent
docker restart roboco-agent-be-dev-1
# Stop all agents
docker ps --filter "name=roboco-agent" -q | xargs docker stop
```
## Creating Tasks
`POST /api/tasks` has no silent defaults — `title`, `description` (min 20 chars), `acceptance_criteria` (at least one), `team`, `task_type`, `nature`, and `estimated_complexity` are all required, plus exactly one of `project_id` (the repo this task targets) or `product_id` (a cell→project map for a fan-out task). See the `TaskCreate` schema in `roboco/models/task.py` (or the Swagger UI at [docs](./docs)) for the full field list and enum values.
2025-12-14 22:05:34 +01:00
```bash
curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/api/tasks \
2025-12-14 22:05:34 +01:00
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"title": "Implement user authentication",
"description": "Add JWT-based auth to the API endpoints",
2025-12-14 22:05:34 +01:00
"team": "backend",
"task_type": "code",
"nature": "technical",
"estimated_complexity": "medium",
"project_id": "<project-uuid>",
2025-12-14 22:05:34 +01:00
"acceptance_criteria": [
"Users can register",
"Users can login",
"Protected routes require valid JWT"
]
}'
```
Enum values: `task_type` ∈ {`code`, `documentation`, `research`, `planning`, `design`, `administrative`}; `nature` ∈ {`technical`, `non_technical`}; `estimated_complexity` ∈ {`low`, `medium`, `high`}.
2025-12-14 22:05:34 +01:00
## Task Lifecycle
```
pending → claimed → in_progress → verifying → awaiting_qa → awaiting_documentation → awaiting_pm_review → completed
↓ ↓
blocked/paused awaiting_ceo_approval (major tasks)
in_progress → awaiting_pr_review → awaiting_pm_review → completed (in-path PR-review gate for assembled PRs)
needs_revision (pr_fail)
2025-12-14 22:05:34 +01:00
```
The leaf flow above is the developer path. Assembled PRs add an in-path PR-review gate: the cell PM's `submit_up` opens the cell→root PR and the Main PM's `submit_root` opens the root→master PR, each moving the task `in_progress → awaiting_pr_review`. There the PR reviewer `pr_pass`es it on to `awaiting_pm_review` or `pr_fail`s it back to `needs_revision`. Leaf developer tasks and branchless coordination roots skip the gate.
2025-12-14 22:05:34 +01:00
Agents automatically:
1. Pull pending work via the gateway verb `give_me_work()`
2. Claim it with `i_will_work_on(task_id)` (auto-creates the feature branch)
2025-12-14 22:05:34 +01:00
3. Follow the workflow: UNDERSTAND → PLAN → EXECUTE → VERIFY → NOTES
4. Open a PR and submit for QA when done (`open_pr` / `i_am_done`)
2025-12-14 22:05:34 +01:00
5. Move to next task
## API Endpoints
| Endpoint | Description |
|----------|-------------|
| `GET /health` | Health check |
| `GET /docs` | Swagger UI |
| `GET /api/orchestrator/status` | Agent states |
| `GET /api/tasks` | List tasks |
| `POST /api/tasks` | Create task |
| `GET /api/tasks/{id}` | Task details |
2025-12-14 22:05:34 +01:00
## Viewing the API
Open http://localhost:8000/docs in your browser for the Swagger UI.
## Common Workflows
### Start a Development Session
```bash
# 1. Start infrastructure
docker compose up -d
# 2. Run migrations (if needed)
uv run alembic upgrade head
# 3. Start with a small team
uv run python -m roboco.cli --spawn main-pm be-dev-1 be-qa
```
### Create and Monitor a Task
```bash
# Create task (all fields below are required — see POST /api/tasks schema)
curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/api/tasks \
2025-12-14 22:05:34 +01:00
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"title": "Fix login bug",
"description": "Login fails on expired-token refresh path",
"team": "backend",
"task_type": "code",
"nature": "technical",
"estimated_complexity": "low",
"project_id": "<project-uuid>",
"acceptance_criteria": ["Expired token refreshes without 500"]
}'
2025-12-14 22:05:34 +01:00
# Watch agent pick it up
docker logs -f roboco-agent-be-dev-1
```
### Shutdown
```bash
# Stop orchestrator (Ctrl+C in terminal)
# Stop agent containers
docker ps --filter "name=roboco-agent" -q | xargs docker stop
# Stop infrastructure
docker compose down
```
## Tips
### Start Small
2026-06-09 17:08:34 +02:00
Don't spawn the whole fleet at once. Start with:
2025-12-14 22:05:34 +01:00
1. `main-pm` alone - verify spawning works
2. Add `be-dev-1` - verify task claiming
3. Add `be-qa` - verify full workflow
### Check Agent Health
```bash
# Quick status
curl -s http://localhost:8000/api/orchestrator/status | jq '.agents'
2025-12-14 22:05:34 +01:00
# Detailed container info
docker inspect roboco-agent-be-dev-1
```
### Debug an Agent
```bash
# View full logs
docker logs roboco-agent-be-dev-1
# Attach to container (read-only)
docker logs -f roboco-agent-be-dev-1
```
### Resource Usage
RAM is modest. Agent containers are spawned on demand and torn down when their work is done, so you rarely have more than a handful live at once — and the on-demand Intake and Secretary only run while you're interacting with them. Steady-state memory is dominated by the standing services (Postgres, Redis, and especially Ollama with its models loaded), not by the agents.
Measured at idle on the reference NAS (full stack up, no task running), the standing services use roughly:
| Service | RAM (idle) |
|---------|------------|
| Ollama (models loaded) | ~2.2 GB |
| Orchestrator | ~150 MB |
| Postgres | ~60 MB |
| Panel | ~35 MB |
| Redis | ~15 MB |
| nginx | ~10 MB |
So the whole standing stack idles around ~2.5 GB, almost all of it Ollama; the application itself is a few hundred MB.
Under load it stays light. Measured with five agents working concurrently (two cells' developers plus a cell PM), each agent container used ~0.50.65 GB, and the whole stack — agents plus services — peaked around ~6.6 GB, roughly 5% of a 128 GB box. The orchestrator itself grows with concurrency (~150 MB idle → ~1 GB while managing several live agent sessions and their streams), and a developer briefly spikes to a few CPU cores while it is actively generating. Even at full-fleet peak you stay well under ~10 GB — RAM is not the constraint; storage is.
Storage is the larger footprint: the image set. The agent images all build `FROM` a shared base layer, so on disk they cost far less than their nominal sizes added together. For reference, the panel image is ~230 MB, the orchestrator ~0.9 GB, the agent base ~1.1 GB, and each agent image ~1.1 GB (the frontend dev/QA images are larger, ~1.9 GB, for their browser/Node toolchain) — but the shared base means the real on-disk total is well below their sum. `docker system prune` reclaims old image versions, stopped agent containers, and build cache (typically a few GB).
2025-12-14 22:05:34 +01:00
Monitor with:
```bash
docker stats # live RAM / CPU per running container
docker system df # image / container / build-cache disk usage
2025-12-14 22:05:34 +01:00
```