Files
f1a0b60c6c chore: unify product name display to OpenDesign repo-wide (#6998)
* chore: unify product name display to OpenDesign repo-wide

Rename the user-facing product name from "Open Design" to "OpenDesign"
across documentation, web/desktop UI strings, i18n locales, prompts,
plugin/skill/design-system content, changelogs, and specs, matching the
landing-page rename already in flight.

Deliberately excluded so installed-app identity stays untouched:
- packages/release PRODUCT_NAME and everything derived from it
  (app bundle names, installer/registry identity, updater feeds)
- tools/pack, tools/release, apps/packaged, landing page (PR #6983)
- mocks/ recorded traces and LICENSE
- test fixtures and comments that encode real on-disk install paths
  (Open Design.app, Program Files\Open Design, AppData paths)

Validated with pnpm guard, pnpm typecheck, and targeted web/desktop/host
test runs over the renamed strings.

* fix(web): keep two-letter author monogram for CamelCase brand names

authorInitials split words on whitespace only, so the renamed single-token
author name "OpenDesign" produced a one-letter monogram. Treat lower-to-upper
CamelCase boundaries as word breaks so the avatar fallback stays "OD".

* fix(release): restore spaced Windows source artifact names in win.ps1

tools/pack still derives builder outputs from the unchanged PRODUCT_NAME
("Open Design"), so the asset script must look for the spaced filenames.
Matches the mac/mac-intel/linux asset scripts, which were already kept on
the original names.

---------

Co-authored-by: Joey <236967869+joeylee12629-star@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-08-18 07:09:45 +00:00

772 B

name, description, license, metadata
name description license metadata
refine-critique-loop Use this plugin when the user has an existing OpenDesign artifact and wants targeted critique, patching, brand tightening, responsive fixes, or quality improvement without starting over. MIT
author version
open-design-spec 0.1.0

Refine Critique Loop

Workflow

  1. Read the existing artifact and identify the user's refinement goal.
  2. Run a structured critique for hierarchy, fit, accessibility, responsiveness, and artifact-specific quality.
  3. Apply the smallest useful patch.
  4. Re-run critique and stop when quality converges or the iteration limit is reached.
  5. Return a diff summary and what changed.

Output Contract

Patch the existing artifact and produce refine-summary.md.