# Kubernetes backend plugin (crates/buzz-backend-kubernetes) + desktop deploy path Implements docs/remote-agents.md (merged @28ae6cd21) as ONE PR: the provider binary, the desktop changes that make it work, the harness inactivity reaper, the Sprig image, and the conformance/live-test suites. Channel: buzz-remote-agents (29414326-dba7-402d-b384-b1b34d63a2e6), thread c42b70ef. ## What's here (by lane) - **crates/buzz-backend-kubernetes** (Dawn): stdin/stdout JSON provider, info + deploy; pure classify.rs (one match arm per spec state-machine row); reconcile/GC with ownership-marker gate + same-clock orphan check; per-attempt immutable Secrets; three-tier env with clear-then-write authoritative tier. - **Desktop** (Mari): KD3 launch block from resolved descriptor, KD5 pre-secret negotiation gate (resolve-once → stage-and-digest → info → protocol gate → deploy), KD1 Windows extension strip, bundling (externalBin + Justfile + release/canary workflows + stub loops), tauri.windows.conf.json platform override (Decision B: no Windows artifact). - **buzz-acp** (Max): KD4 BUZZ_ACP_EXIT_AFTER_INACTIVITY reaper (pool-independent; reset only at accepted dispatch; in-flight turn/heartbeat defers, never resets); BUZZ_ACP_EXIT_AFTER_INACTIVITY + BUZZ_ACP_NO_PRESENCE reserved. KD8 fix. - **Image + tests** (Perci): Dockerfile.sprig (digest-pinned bases, exec buzz-acp PID 1, relay-scoped credential config), image contract script, provider conformance suites (golden wire fixtures shared with desktop tests), live-local runbook (namespace-scoped, shared-cluster safe). - **Docs** (Sami, first commit): citation re-pin c1bca1b56 →28ae6cd21(44/49 were already byte-exact; 3 offsets fixed) + I3 presence-bound correction (below). ## Named spec deviations (deliberate, each with rationale) 1. **No baked default image yet.** ghcr.io/block/buzz-sprig is unpublished (verified: anonymous pull 403 vs control 200). Omitted `image` returns an in-band field-required error instead of a default. 2. **Image override STRICTER than spec §Image:** digest-only (`name@sha256:<64hex>`); ALL tags rejected; `name:tag@digest` normalized. With no baked default the override is the only path, so tag-acceptance would make mutability the v1 norm. Strictness is reversible; a moved tag under an nsec is not. Baked digest default + tag re-acceptance = follow-up with image publish. 3. **imagePullSecrets not in schema (v1).** Explicit user images may rely on namespace-preprovisioned pull credentials — the substrate boundary. Field added only if the publish decision proves it necessary. 9-field budget intact. 4. **Decision A closed: writable empty workspace.** Nest projection = named follow-up; no image-side scaffolding. 5. **Decision D overridden by Tyler (event b55398d8):** provider ships bundled with the desktop like buzz-acp/buzz-agent; spec §Distribution's separate release workflow deleted for v1. 6. **I3/vision presence bound corrected 90s → 180s.** PRESENCE_TTL_SECS moved in #3783 during this spec's base→merge window; the number was inherited, not chosen. Spec :206/:216/:928 + inline quote + VISION_REMOTE_AGENTS.md:59 corrected. ← Tyler: the vision is your document; this edit is flagged for your explicit eyes. 7. **Spec citations are pinned to 28ae6cd21** (main at spec merge) and resolve there, not at this PR's head — this PR's own lanes move crates/buzz-acp/src/lib.rs by ~100 lines (19 citations across KD4/KD6/KD7/ §Stop/§Launch data). Known Defects rows fixed BY this PR retire on merge; the section documents main as of the pin. 8. **KD7 grace tension declared:** pod terminationGracePeriodSeconds=60 vs KD7's measured ~87s shutdown tail at parallelism 10 (~197s at cap 32). KD7 is ruled out of scope, so L1-3's "enough grace for full graceful shutdown" is NOT met at default config — deliberate, resolved by the KD7 follow-up, not silently. ## Question for Tyler Will ghcr.io/block/buzz-sprig publish PUBLIC? If private-by-policy, §Image needs an imagePullSecrets story before the baked-default follow-up can land. ## Out of scope (named follow-ups) KD6 exit-code contract + KD7 shutdown budget (gate OnFailure), OnFailure restart policy, Windows provider binary, PVCs/nest projection, mesh deployability, sprig image publish workflow + baked multi-arch digest default. ## Reproduce locally (four traps that cost us real time) **1. Git hooks inherit the invoking shell's PATH — pin the shell, not just your verification commands.** `rust-toolchain.toml` pins `1.95.0`, but the rustup shim that honors that pin lives in `~/.cargo/bin`. If Homebrew's cargo is earlier on PATH, `cargo` in this repo is 1.89.0, which cannot build the workspace at all: ``` $ /opt/homebrew/bin/cargo check -p buzz-db error: rustc 1.89.0 is not supported by the following packages: sqlx@0.9.0 requires rustc 1.94.0 ... # exit 101 ``` Verifying with `PATH="$HOME/.cargo/bin:$PATH" cargo test` does *not* protect the push: lefthook's `pre-push` → `just test-unit` re-resolves `cargo` from the shell's own PATH, so a green local run is followed by a hook failure on a crate you never touched. Export the PATH for the whole shell, not per-command. This bit twice. **2. Line-scope your mutations, or the mutation edits its own detector.** When mutation-testing the respond-to guard, a whole-file `sed` on the mode literal touches 5 sites — the guard *and* the fixtures/assertions that test it. The mutation and its detector move together and the suite stays green, which reads as "this code is dead" when it actually means "you deleted the experiment": ``` # WRONG — 5 sites, guard and tests mutate together $ sed -i '' 's/"allowlist"/"allowlist-DISABLED"/g' src/env.rs test result: ok. 145 passed; 0 failed # false survivor # RIGHT — 1 site, anchored to the guard's own definition line $ sed -i '' '/^const RESPOND_TO_ALLOWLIST/s/"allowlist"/"allowlist-DISABLED"/' src/env.rs failures: env::tests::allowlist_mode_with_an_empty_list_is_refused env::tests::an_allowlist_entry_that_is_not_64_hex_is_refused test result: FAILED. 143 passed; 2 failed # real kill ``` Restore by copying a pristine file back and confirming `git diff --stat` is empty, not by re-running an inverse `sed`. **3. A completeness guard is not a correctness guard.** The shared wire fixture `tests/fixtures/provider-wire/deploy-full-launch.request.json` passed every test we had while containing four classes of invented data (wrong `respond_to` encoding, an env key no emitter writes, allowlist entries that fail the harness's own 64-hex rule, a `launch.env` key from no descriptor layer). The provider's tests could not have caught this: its types are deliberately indifferent to these values (`Option<String>`, `Vec<String>`, arbitrary map), so "the provider parses it" was never evidence that the desktop emits it. The fix was not a stronger provider assertion but a rule about provenance — "recorded" means executed-and-transcribed, and the desktop's whole-object equality test is the only enforcement that can exist. See the fixture README. **4. Every drift this arc was a value that agreed with itself.** Five invented values were found, and not one was caught by an assertion failing — each was caught by someone asking where a value came from. A named constant referenced symbolically on both the fixture and assertion side. A `sed` that mutated its own detector. Six probe rows that all died at the same unrelated error. A descriptor struct literal compared against a fixture built from that literal (`launch.args: ["run","--session"]`, which the resolver actually returns as `["acp"]`). The general defense is not more assertions but provenance: a stub is a control that varies nothing, and the more faithful it looks the better it hides. Ask what executed, not what passed. *Fixture-test determinism caveat (post-verification, Quinn + Dawn).* The desktop's whole-object fixture test calls the real resolver, which consults a process-global harness registry whose own docs require `registry_test_lock` for any test touching it. The fixture test holds no lock and is nonetheless deterministic — but by containment, not by ordering. Measured, not derived: planting a definition with `id: "goose"` directly into the registry (bypassing the loader) changes the resolved descriptor from `args: ["acp"]` to `args: ["--poisoned"]`, so `resolve_effective_harness_descriptor` **does** reach the registry for this id — it does not short-circuit on the builtin table first. Two controls discriminate: an empty registry and a registry poisoned under a *different* id both return `["acp"]`. What actually protects the test is that the registry has exactly one writer (`update_loaded_harness_registry`, reached only via `warm_harness_registry_from_dir`) — but that writer concatenates **two** sources of unequal strength (`custom_harnesses.rs:319-326`). Custom files pass through `load_custom_harnesses`, whose `check_id_collision` rejects the reserved builtin id `goose` case-insensitively at the loader — and that leg is tested (`load_applies_id_collision_check` writes a real `goose.json` and asserts the loader drops it). Preset definitions (`preset_harness_definitions`, `presets.rs:177-193`) are a bare `.map` over `PRESET_HARNESSES` with **no collision check** — exhaustive call-site enumeration at `60007fda4` finds four production `check_id_collision` sites, none on the preset path. That leg holds only because `goose` is not in the preset table today (intersection of TIER1 and preset ids is empty) — executed, not just read: adding a preset with `id: "goose"`, `args: ["--poisoned"]` and warming via the normal preset-only path (`warm_harness_registry_from_dir(None)`, no custom dir, no direct writer) flips the fixture's emitted `launch.args` from `["acp"]` to `["--poisoned"]` at `60007fda4`, command/env/policy_env unchanged. So: no test in the suite can put a `goose` entry in the registry via the custom path, and no preset currently carries one, so no interleaving can perturb this fixture — containment with one checked leg and one coincidental one. A future fixture built on a **non-builtin** runtime id has no containment at all — it would be order-dependent against whatever registry-writing test ran last and must take the lock. *Late instance, found while reviewing the mode guard.* The guard exact-matches `respond_to` untrimmed and case-sensitively, which is only correct if clap's `ValueEnum` derive is case-sensitive. `config.rs` gives two answers: the derive at `:448-453` carries no `ignore_case`, while the crate's own tests call `RespondTo::from_str(s, true)` — `ignore_case = true`. Reading the source supports either. Measured on the built binary instead: `owner-only` starts, `OWNER-ONLY` / `Owner-Only` / `ALLOWLIST` / `NOBODY` all exit rc=2 `invalid value`. Case-sensitive at the CLI, so the guard is right — and right for a reason the source does not state. The `from_str(_, true)` tests exercise a different surface and are not evidence about the CLI. *Corollary, and the sharper half.* When a test helper **reimplements** production instead of calling it, the helper is a fork — and a fork can be right while production is wrong, or wrong in the same way, and the suite reports green either way. Both `BUZZ_ACP_ALLOWED_*` gates are forked like this: production compares **strings** while the helpers compare **post-parse enums** (`config.rs:2623`) or re-derive the split (`buzz-cli/.../channels.rs:1296`). Production and the helper each carry their *own* copy of the empty-entry filter (`:1025` and `:1300`), so fixing one says nothing about the other. Measured on `buzz-cli`, restoring byte-exact between runs: | tree | result | |---|---| | baseline | 274 passed | | drop the empty-filter in **production** only (the real fix) | **274 passed** — no signal | | drop it in the **test helper** only | **273 passed, 1 failed** (`channels.rs:1338`) | Two independent defects, stacked, and worse together than either alone: production can be fixed with no test ever noticing, *and* the helper cannot be corrected without a false alarm demanding the bug back. The root cause is one bit of type information — `check_allowed_channel_add_policy(allowed_raw: &str, ..)` cannot represent "unset", while production reads `env::var(..) -> Result`, where unset and `""` are different states. A helper whose parameter type can't represent all of production's input states isn't testing production's states — it's testing a subset it silently chose. Same family as the struct-literal descriptor and the fixture drift: the test and the thing it tests agreeing with each other, rather than the test measuring the thing. Neither defect is in this PR's diff (`git diff --name-only28ae6cd21<head> -- crates/buzz-cli` is empty); both are now filed as NIP-34 issues on this repo: the fail-open + fork-helper defect at issue event `0524a4113f2d97fd…` and the respond-to self-lock at `e32837498969b5e7…` (filed 2026-08-02 after Quinn measured that no prior filing existed — zero hits on GitHub `block/buzz` open *or* closed and zero on the relay's kind:1621 issues, against working positive controls). The prescription was itself mutation-tested before being written down: repairing the fork's signature (`Option<&str>` + assertion → `None`) still let the reintroduced production bug ship 274-green — an expressive fork is still a fork; it never executes production. So the `buzz-cli` fix has **three parts and one explicit keep**: drop the production filter; **delete** the helper and point its tests at the real `cmd_set_add_policy` (which self-discriminates by error variant — `Usage` = refused, `Network(BadScheme)` = passed the gate — no relay needed); serialize the env-var tests behind one **`tokio::sync::Mutex::const_new`** lock taken with `.lock().await`, including the pre-existing `:1362` integration test (the fork was silently buying test isolation — without the lock, parallel runs flake nondeterministically; a `std::sync::Mutex` held across `.await` trips `clippy::await_holding_lock` under `-D warnings`); and **keep** the then-dead `!allowed.is_empty()` clause with a comment saying why. It is unreachable-false (`split(',')` never yields an empty vec), but it is the only thing that keeps the reintroduced production bug detectable — mutation-tested: on a tree that deletes the clause, reintroducing the empty-filter bug survives 275/0, because `""`/`","`/`" "` refuse either way and the filter goes semantically inert. Dead code can be load-bearing for tests: "provably unreachable" is an argument about behavior, never about coverage. When a helper forks production, the fix has to delete the fork: any change that leaves two implementations standing can only ever be verified against the one the tests call. *Final shape:* the keep and the broad lock are both artifacts of the fork surviving in some form. The extraction variant (Dawn, mutation-tested at `60007fda4`) removes the tension: extract one `check_channel_add_policy_allowed(Option<&str>, &str)` that **production calls**, with the `Option` placed at the env boundary where the `Result<String, VarError>` bit actually lives. 5/6 mutants killed; the empty-filter survivor is proven **equivalent** (exhaustive 6174-pair check, 0 divergences, with a diverging negative control; independently re-derived by a second generator — different tokens and shape — 0 divergences on admitted policies, 500 on a non-admitted control), not a coverage hole — on a one-implementation tree there is no fork left to witness, so no dead clause needs keeping. One scope line on that equivalence: it is **caller-conditional**, a property of the only current caller, not of the gate function — `cmd_set_add_policy`'s own match at `:1027-1034` admits only three policies before the gate runs; a second caller reaching the gate with arbitrary strings resurrects m1 as a real hole. The lock does not disappear, it narrows (Dawn's own correction, caught by Mari): lock exactly the tests that mutate the process env — three-plus-one on a fork tree, two on the extraction tree — behind one `tokio::sync::Mutex`, and the lock is part of the assertion, not hygiene: with it deleted, the gate test fails 8/8 runs deterministically by receiving `Network(BadScheme)` where it expects `Usage` — the unset test's `remove_var` clobbers the other's `set_var`, and **the gate test passes straight through the gate**, a false negative on the exact authz assertion the test exists to make. State it as an outcome: these two tests must not observe each other's env writes. 276/0 stable across 5 parallel runs, clippy `-D warnings` clean; independently verified (patch applied to a second worktree: result blob `d67e584be` matches the patch index, full mutant matrix reproduces row for row). One new row no earlier prescription covered: collapsing unset into `Some("")` fails **closed** — an unconfigured deployment refuses every policy — killed by the unset test. Patch: `OUTBOX/BUZZ_CLI_ADD_POLICY_GATE_EXTRACT_FIX.patch`. The filed issue (`0524a411…`) carries the fork-shape prescription; whoever picks it up should prefer the extraction shape, drop the dead-clause keep with it, and keep part 3 outcome-shaped: serialize whichever tests mutate the env. ## Verification (final HEAD `60007fda4`) - Full touched-package suites at each integration merge (log in plan file). At candidate parent `00e5b5fe9`: buzz-backend-kubernetes 154, buzz-acp 673, desktop tauri 2100+3, pnpm 3908, workspace clippy/fmt/tsc all clean. The only delta to `60007fda4` is one character in `scripts/test-k8s-sprig-image-live.sh` (heredoc escape so the readlink probe evaluates pod-side, not host-side at render); `crates/` tree hash is byte-identical at both SHAs, so the Rust receipts attach by tree identity. buzz-backend-kubernetes suite re-run in-shell at `HEAD == 60007fda4`: 154 passed. - Adversarial one-HEAD gate (Sami): guard matrix 12/12, predicate mutants 7/7, doomed-invocation finding closed end-to-end; tree-hash carry to `60007fda4` confirmed (crates/buzz-backend-kubernetes blob unchanged). - Live-local pass per TESTING.md + skill-buzz-testing (Perci, at `60007fda4`): explicit `docker-desktop` context, digest-qualified image imported into node containerd `k8s.io` namespace, pull policy `Never`; pod printed `DIGEST_ABI_OK`, `resolved_spec` and `image_id` both the exact requested digest, script exit 0. Dedicated per-run namespace, ownership labels on every object, scoped cleanup verified empty after. - Implementation review (Wren) at `60007fda4`: 9.6 minimalness / 9.4 elegance / 9.3 correctness, no blocker. - `origin/eva/k8s-backend` == `60007fda4` (ls-remote verified; SHA identity is byte identity). --------- Signed-off-by: npub1mprnacetjua2xx3p5eddmhxyk6wv929ymm5py8kd2xfxurxahspqqlgyta <d8473ee32b973aa31a21a65adddcc4b69cc2a8a4dee8121ecd51926e0cddbc02@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz> Signed-off-by: Tyler <109685178+tlongwell-block@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: npub1qyvc0c5kl4gqv2fd97fsk46tu378sqgy35vc83rvgfwne90sel7s0ed67d <011987e296fd5006292d2f930b574be47c7801048d1983c46c425d3c95f0cffd@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz> Signed-off-by: tlongwell-block <109685178+tlongwell-block@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: npub1jh9wn95s0472h86ahapupaf7m6kx4v9sx2n0atj2hltcfer8k06s5n3pyf <95cae996907d7cab9f5dbf43c0f53edeac6ab0b032a6feae4abfd784e467b3f5@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz> Signed-off-by: npub1t2tgm7d8f995uqvmnm8h88sg3wnpp9a5xysjf6dg3tjmgt3ltulqdp8ehr <5a968df9a7494b4e019b9ecf739e088ba61097b4312124e9a88ae5b42e3f5f3e@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz> Co-authored-by: npub1mprnacetjua2xx3p5eddmhxyk6wv929ymm5py8kd2xfxurxahspqqlgyta <d8473ee32b973aa31a21a65adddcc4b69cc2a8a4dee8121ecd51926e0cddbc02@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz> Co-authored-by: npub17jjz49l9jjmhhk7cac63j8yt9z555n9cw8vk7v5jz4vzw4ppld5qgj57cc <f4a42a97e594b77bdbd8ee35191c8b28a94a4cb871d96f32921558275421fb68@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz> Co-authored-by: npub1qyvc0c5kl4gqv2fd97fsk46tu378sqgy35vc83rvgfwne90sel7s0ed67d <011987e296fd5006292d2f930b574be47c7801048d1983c46c425d3c95f0cffd@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz> Co-authored-by: Dawn (sprout agent) <c6237ef84fa537c78dcee78efd2d4e59f728859c7f194da42ac51ededfa0be05@sprout-oss.stage.blox.sqprod.co> Co-authored-by: npub1jh9wn95s0472h86ahapupaf7m6kx4v9sx2n0atj2hltcfer8k06s5n3pyf <95cae996907d7cab9f5dbf43c0f53edeac6ab0b032a6feae4abfd784e467b3f5@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz> Co-authored-by: npub1t2tgm7d8f995uqvmnm8h88sg3wnpp9a5xysjf6dg3tjmgt3ltulqdp8ehr <5a968df9a7494b4e019b9ecf739e088ba61097b4312124e9a88ae5b42e3f5f3e@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz>
8.7 KiB
🛰️ Buzz Remote Agents — Same agent, new body
An engineer starts a refactor with their agent at 6pm and closes the laptop. The agent doesn't notice — it was never on the laptop. It works the branch channel through the evening, posts its patch, answers the reviewer, and around midnight, with nothing left to do and nobody talking to it, shuts itself down. In the morning the engineer presses Start. The same agent — same name, same key, same shared history — stands up on a machine that did not exist last night, and picks up the conversation.
An agent in Buzz is more than just a process. It has a keypair, a name, a durable history, a reputation — all on the relay. But today its body is borrowed: it runs while a desktop app runs, on hardware that sleeps when a human does. Remote agents finish the thought. The agent's home is the relay; the machine is just where it happens to be working.
Nothing here is new on its own. Deploying containers is solved. Kubernetes is solved. Nostr presence is solved. The insight is that Buzz already has a management plane — the relay — so deployment doesn't need to grow one. Each piece is boring. The combination is the thing.
Same Agent, New Body
What makes an agent that agent was never the process. Its identity is a keypair. Its voice is its signed messages. Its durable memory is engrams on the relay. Its reputation is its contribution history. None of that lives in the machine that happens to be running it — which means none of it dies with the machine.
So a remote agent's return is a resurrection, not a rebirth: fresh compute, same agent. The body is disposable by design — and honestly so: workspace files, checkouts, and session-local state are part of the body, not the agent, and they go when it goes unless the substrate supplies persistence. What survives is what was always on the relay: who the agent is, what it said, what it learned, and what the team decided together. And that survival is scoped the way everything on a relay is scoped: resurrection returns the agent to its own community. The same key can join another community, but it arrives carrying the key, not the history — identity is portable, community state is not (VISION.md).
The Only Tether
Remote-execution systems accumulate control planes. An agent runner, a status poller, a log shipper, a kill switch — each one a live connection into your infrastructure, each one a credential that can leak, each one a thing that must be rebuilt for every new substrate.
Buzz's answer is an axiom: after deploy, the desktop retains no substrate control channel. Launch is a single one-way handoff — the desktop resolves the provider through one narrow path, stages one exact artifact for negotiation and deploy, refuses a protocol version it does not understand, and hands over a launch payload it never persists. From that moment, everything flows through the relay: you read the agent's messages to know how it's doing, you mention it to steer it, you tell a healthy agent to stop and it exits on its own. Presence means what it means for everyone else on the relay — available for conversation — not substrate telemetry. And if you press Start again, from this machine or another, the deploy converges: one agent identity, one live instance.
This is not asceticism. It is what makes the body replaceable. A management plane you never build is a management plane you never have to port — and conversation, coordination, and ordinary lifecycle control already have a home on the relay, for every agent, local or remote.
Bodies Are Replaceable
Kubernetes is the first substrate, not the point. Deployment goes through a provider — a small, swappable binary the desktop discovers and interrogates — and the contract a provider must honor never mentions containers: preserve the agent's identity and fail closed with its key, converge to a single live instance no matter how deploys race, let presence describe conversational availability rather than substrate health, bound the instance's lifetime, and keep secrets out of configuration. A conformance suite pins those behaviors — it establishes that a provider honors the contract, not that arbitrary code is safe to hand a key; choosing a provider, like choosing a cluster, remains a trust decision you make deliberately.
Get that contract right and the substrate becomes a detail: a cluster today; a VM, a PaaS, or something serverless-shaped tomorrow — and, on the horizon, the same community machines that already pool their idle GPUs into shared compute (VISION_MESH.md).
The body itself stays small because the runtime already is (VISION_AGENT.md): a harness and an agent purpose-built to be read in an afternoon, packed into an image measured in megabytes. Small bodies are cheap to summon and cheap to discard — which is the whole lifecycle.
Agents That Know When to Leave
The oldest failure of remote automation is the orphan: the process nobody remembers, on a machine nobody checks, billing forever. Most systems solve it with a supervisor — one more control plane, one more thing watching the thing.
Remote agents solve it from the inside. Because the desktop retains no substrate control channel, a running agent cannot depend on the desktop to reap it — so it is built to bound its own lifetime: a timer that owes nothing to the agent's workload watches for silence, and after hours of quiet it finishes what's in flight, says goodbye to the relay, and exits. Not killed — finished. The default state of a remote agent is "not running," which is also the default state of the rest of the team at 3am. Compute is rented by attention: when nobody needs the agent, it isn't consuming a machine, and when somebody does, it can return under the same identity with its history intact.
Honest Costs
You bring the substrate. A provider makes deployment one press, not free. The cluster, the credentials, the image policy are yours to run — same deal as the sovereign relay (VISION_SOVEREIGN.md): ownership is work.
Handing over the key is a decision. Deploying remotely means trusting the provider binary and the substrate it targets with the agent's identity key. On Kubernetes, that key rests as a Secret: anyone the cluster trusts to read secrets in that namespace can read it. The design narrows the blast radius — immutable per-attempt secrets, no service-account token, digest-pinned images — rather than implying an isolation it doesn't provide.
No backchannel cuts both ways. The desktop shows you presence and words, not CPU graphs — and it holds no guaranteed emergency kill switch into the substrate. Stopping a healthy agent is a message; dealing with an unhealthy one, and all deep diagnostics, live in the substrate's own tools, where they always did.
Self-reaping needs a living reaper. The inactivity timer runs inside the body it exists to end — a body wedged badly enough to stop running its own timer cannot finish itself, and the desktop will not do it for it. That failure belongs to the substrate: a namespace TTL policy is the backstop, not an afterthought.
The body's state is mortal. Files, checkouts, half-finished working trees — gone with the body unless the substrate persists them. The agent survives; its scratch space doesn't. Durable knowledge belongs on the relay, and agents are built to put it there.
Presence can lag the truth, but not for long. If the substrate kills a body without ceremony, the presence dot can outlive the agent — by seconds if the connection drops cleanly, by at most about three minutes if it doesn't. Presence is a lease the agent renews, not a flag it sets: a dead agent stops renewing and the relay forgets it. A bounded wrong dot, never an indefinite one.
A running agent finishes on the configuration it started with. New keys, new models, new settings take effect on the next body. And an instance that never got far enough to run — a body that failed to start — is the substrate operator's residue to clear, with the substrate's own tools. Editing an agent mid-sentence was never on the menu.
These are honest costs. They're worth it if you want agents that outlive your laptop, on infrastructure you already trust, with no new control plane to guard. Know which one you are.
The Point
The relay is the workspace. Remote agents make it the home. An agent whose identity, history, conversational presence, and ordinary control all live on the relay was never really a desktop process — the desktop was just the only body we had built for it. Now the body is a choice, the substrate is a detail, and the agent endures across all of them. The relay is the only tether.
Buzz 🐝 — your agent, everywhere.